No description available.

Bråk är inkörsporten till rationella tal och en god förståelse av bråk ligger till grund för den enskilda elevens fortsatta matematikutveckling. Yngre elever, i de tidiga skolåren, har ofta en intuitiv förståelse för enkla bråk, men glappet till den mer formella undervisningen är stort. Svårigheter att lära sig bråk är genomgående och ger långtgående konsekvenser. Det är därför av stor vikt att tidigt uppmärksamma och ge stöd till de elever som möter svårigheter inom detta område. Vi har replikerat en tidigare genomförd interventionsstudie med enskild intensivundervisning kring bråk genom explicit undervisning och CRA. Interventionen fokuserar på bråk som tal, där tallinjen spelar en avgörande roll, och består av nio lektionstillfällen. Syftet med studien har varit att bidra med kunskap om interventioner i matematik samt att undersöka vilken effekt ett interventionsprogram med enskild intensivundervisning har på elever i matematiksvårigheter i årskurs 5 och 6. Syftet har också varit att undersöka om elevernas relationer till matematikämnet kan förändras av interventionen.  Studien är en experimentell fallstudie med sex deltagare, där varje individ utgör sin egen kontroll. Data har samlats in i form av resultat på olika tester och skattningar, före, under och efter interventionen. Resultatet visar på en signifikant förbättring av elevernas kunskaper om bråk som tal efter genomförd intervention. Dessutom framkommer en spridningseffekt till området bråk som del av en helhet/antal, vilket tyder på en ökad konceptuell förståelse av bråk. Elevernas kunskaper kvarstår vid ett fördröjt eftertest, fem veckor efter avslutad intervention.  Den slutsats vi drar utifrån resultatet är att en kortare intervention på individnivå, om bråk som tal med tallinjen i fokus, kan ge stor effekt på elevernas kunskaper, som kvarstår över tid. Vi kan inte dra några generella slutsatser kring huruvida elevernas relationer till matematikämnet förändras av interventionen.

No description available.

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of child-centered play therapy (CCPT) on the social competence, empathy, and self-regulation of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The constructs of social competence, empathy, and self-regulation were measured using the Social-Emotional Assets Rating Scale (SEARS). This study utilized a single-case design; the researcher collected data throughout the duration of the study, including baseline, treatment, and follow-up phases. The sample included 5 children ranging from ages 6 to 8 years old: 3 Caucasian males, 1 African-American female, and 1 Latin-American female. Mothers of the participants completed the parent form of the SEARS once per week throughout all phases of the study. During the treatment phase of the study, the children participated in CCPT approximately 2 times per week for 30 minutes each time. Visual analysis of the data indicated play therapy was beneficial for three participants, as they demonstrated improvements in social competence, empathy, and self-regulation. Two participants responded to the intervention with mixed results. Discussion includes implications for clinical practice and future research as well as limitations of the study.

High prevalence of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and the legislation movement impacted the placement of students with ASD in general education settings. Hence, the increase raised the need to conduct research for ASD populations, and to examine the effectiveness of these interventions. With the increase of single case-design (SCD) studies, there is a demand to include SCD in the evaluation of evidence- based practices (EBPs), to analyze and interpret SCD results in meaningful ways beside visual analysis, and to generate effect size estimates. This dissertation contains four systematic literature reviews which examine single-case intervention research targeting academic, social communication, play, and functional life skills for children with ASD in school settings. 132 studies with 924 AB phase contrasts were analyzed using visual analysis and three non-overlap measures. Sensitivity and specificity of Tau-U, IRD, and Baseline Corrected Tau were tested on detecting intervention effects. Also, the three methods were examined in their agreement with interpretations based on the visual analysis and the effect of confounding factor on their scores. The analysis demonstrated that the three methods performed fairly well in distinguishing effective from non-effective interventions. The three non-overlap methods had a moderate to substantial level of agreement with visual analysis. The author recommended further research on the impact of confounding factors especially baseline trend and autocorrelation as well as the use of effect size methods with high sensitivity and visual aids to improve the reliability and accuracy of visual analysis.

I den här studien undersöktes fyra elevers kunskapsutveckling och inställning till ämnet matematik under en period av tre veckors intervention. Syftet var att mäta om en enskild intensivundervisning i matematik inom ordinarie undervisningstid kunde vara gynnsam för elever i svårigheter med taluppfattning. Ytterligare syfte var att se på om intensivundervisningen hade någon effekt på elevernas självskattning kring matematik. Studien är en experimentell fallstudie med multipel baslinje singlecase-design. Resultatet visade att interventionen har varit gynnsam för de ingående eleverna både vad gäller kunskapsutvecklingen och deras inställning och självskattning till ämnet. / This study investigates the knowledge progression of four pupils and their attitude to mathematics during a period of three weeks. The aim is to measure whether pupils with number sense problems could benefit from intensive one-to-one teaching of mathematics, within regular teaching hours. The study also aims to find out if intensive teaching affects the pupils´self-assessment regarding mathematics. An experimental case study, with multiple baseline singlecase design, has been used. The results indicate that the intervention has proved beneficial to the pupils in the study, when it comes to their knowledge progression as well as their attitude and self-assessment.

A model of Teacher Child Interaction Therapy (TCIT) was implemented in two kindergarten classrooms of students (n = 2) who successfully completed Parent Child Interaction Therapy, but continued to demonstrate disruptive behaviors in the classroom. The current study first indicated that TCIT was implemented with integrity by both the therapists and teacher participants. Next, the effects of this intervention on the teacher’s skills, students’ disruptive behaviors, teacher’s stress, and teacher-child relationships were investigated. The treatment acceptability was also examined. Both visual and statistical analyses found a treatment effect in both cases was seen for both teachers’ increased use of positive interaction skills and decrease of negative interaction skills during the intervention session. However, these skills generalized to the interactions between the teacher and student during classroom instruction. Mixed results were found related to teachers’ use of effective commands. Results from visual analysis indicated that one child participant demonstrated a decrease in disruptive behaviors according to both teacher rating scales and classroom behavior observations. Neither teacher indicated significantly reduced stress over the course of TCIT. Teacher-child relationships improved for both students; however, one teacher also reported increased conflict in the relationship. Both teachers expressed high levels of treatment acceptability for the intervention. Further research should investigate the underlying causes for the nuances in the findings of this study. Additional research is also warranted to determine whether these results can be generalized to other students as well as best practices for implementing this intervention in schools.

No description available.

No description available.

Research shows that conversations and daily interaction among teachers and children is crucial for their development. Observing children and interpreting their thinking processes is a significant factor in intentionally planning curriculum that emerges from children’s thinking, assists them in making connections, and extends their learning. This article presents findings of a single case design study investigating the effects of the observation and interpretation processes in a Cycle of Inquiry System (COI) (Broderick and Hong in Early Childh Res Pract 13:1–14, 2011) intervention on preschool teachers’ productive conversations with children. The intervention for each teacher consisted of pre and post interviews, a 1-day COI training, use of COI observation and interpretation forms, and coaching meetings with the researcher. The participants were 4 preschool teachers in Northeast Tennessee. Teachers were videotaped in their classrooms working with children during the free play time and coded for productive and non-productive conversation strategies for determining the baseline and changes during the intervention. All the teachers show an increase in productive conversation strategies to differing degrees. The non-overlapping pairs analysis for all participants is represented by a large value. The findings indicate the benefit of training teachers to observe and interpret the meaning of children’s conversations to intentionally plan for productive conversations that impact learning.