<p>Many students in the Swedish and Norwegian compulsory school do not have quali­fi­cation to search for further education. There is a large part of those pupils who have a different native language than the country’s majority language. These students’ possi­bi­lities to a fair and equal education is regulated in national laws and regulations of school activity, the so-called governing documents.</p><p> </p><p>The purpose of this study is to compare Norwegian and Swedish governing docu­ments regarding education for pupils with another native language. The comparison also app­lies to the requirements that each country has for the students who are looking to the Swedish upper secondary school, and its counterpart in Norway, “den videre­gående skolen”.</p><p> </p><p>It is possible to see some similarities in the design of the governing documents and the school as an institution. However, there are some differences in the content of teaching and the document that governs this. The Norwegian school and Norwegian governing documents put more focus on the Norwegian language, while the Swedish school system and Swedish governing documents have a more generous attitude towards the native language.</p> / <p>Många elever i svenska och norska grundskolan har inte behörighet att söka till vidare utbildning. Det är en stor andel av dessa elever som har ett annat modersmål än landets majoritetsspråk. Dessa elevers möjligheter till en rättvis och likvärdig utbildning finns reglerade i ländernas lagar och regler för skolverksamheten, de så kallade styr­doku­menten.</p><p> </p><p>Syftet med denna undersökning är att jämföra norska och svenska styrdokument an­gående undervisningen för elever som har annat modersmål. Jämförelsen gäller även vilka krav respektive land har för de elever som söker till den svenska gymnasie­skolan, och dess motsvarighet i Norge, ”den videregående skolen”.</p><p> </p><p>Det går att se vissa likheter i utformningen av styrdokumenten och grundskolan som in­stitution. Däremot finns en del skillnader när det gäller innehållet i undervisningen och de dokument som styr denna. Den norska skolan och de norska styrdokumenten lägger mera fokus på det norska språket, medan den svenska skolan och de svenska styr­dokumenten har en generösare attityd till modersmålet.</p>

Many students in the Swedish and Norwegian compulsory school do not have quali­fi­cation to search for further education. There is a large part of those pupils who have a different native language than the country’s majority language. These students’ possi­bi­lities to a fair and equal education is regulated in national laws and regulations of school activity, the so-called governing documents.   The purpose of this study is to compare Norwegian and Swedish governing docu­ments regarding education for pupils with another native language. The comparison also app­lies to the requirements that each country has for the students who are looking to the Swedish upper secondary school, and its counterpart in Norway, “den videre­gående skolen”.   It is possible to see some similarities in the design of the governing documents and the school as an institution. However, there are some differences in the content of teaching and the document that governs this. The Norwegian school and Norwegian governing documents put more focus on the Norwegian language, while the Swedish school system and Swedish governing documents have a more generous attitude towards the native language. / Många elever i svenska och norska grundskolan har inte behörighet att söka till vidare utbildning. Det är en stor andel av dessa elever som har ett annat modersmål än landets majoritetsspråk. Dessa elevers möjligheter till en rättvis och likvärdig utbildning finns reglerade i ländernas lagar och regler för skolverksamheten, de så kallade styr­doku­menten.   Syftet med denna undersökning är att jämföra norska och svenska styrdokument an­gående undervisningen för elever som har annat modersmål. Jämförelsen gäller även vilka krav respektive land har för de elever som söker till den svenska gymnasie­skolan, och dess motsvarighet i Norge, ”den videregående skolen”.   Det går att se vissa likheter i utformningen av styrdokumenten och grundskolan som in­stitution. Däremot finns en del skillnader när det gäller innehållet i undervisningen och de dokument som styr denna. Den norska skolan och de norska styrdokumenten lägger mera fokus på det norska språket, medan den svenska skolan och de svenska styr­dokumenten har en generösare attityd till modersmålet.

This study deals with how the subjects Gardening, Handicraft, Domestic Science and Temperance Instruction were introduced and developed in elementary school (compulsory school) in Sweden during the period 1842-1919. During this same period a capitalist mode of production replaced the feudal one with consequent changes in home life for the people. The school subjects dealt with have been selected to throw light on whether and to what extent the elementary school was used to bring about a reorganization in the lives of wage earner families.The official argument, curricula and school enquiries have been examined. Teaching content in relation to workers' family conditions has been studied in the parish of Skön in the sawmill region of northern Sweden.The main official argument was that the miserable conditions of working class life were caused just as much by ignorant housewives and drunken fathers as by low wages and poor housing. The cure was therefore seen to lie in education, and the introduction of the subjects in question can be seen in the light of this.The study shows how the state gradually took over more and more of the responsibility for child upbringing, and how the schools of the sawmill companies played a part in this process. The results, however, indicate that the actual effect of elementary school teaching on the home lives of sawmill workers was insignificant. Working class poverty was ol course caused primarily by economic and structural factors, but defining the problems in pedagogical terms meant that responsibility could be apportioned at an individual level - and thereby the bourgeoisie reaped considerable ideological profits.Key word: history of education, Swedish compulsory school, Gardening, Handicraft, Domestic Science, Temperance Instruction, working class family, sawmill region. / digitalisering@umu

There are three different strategies for language learning, translation, code switching and translanguaging. In this systematic review we have investigated how important translanguaging is for students language- and knowledge development. The aim of the review is to acknowledge which support there is for teachers when using translanguaging in the classroom. We have analyzed eight different studies focusing on students and teachers development when using translanguaging, to find a conclusion to if it is important. The results show that translanguaging is presented positively both in general but mostly in classrooms and that translanguaging is a helping tool for students to show their full knowledge.

Abstract  This study examined grade 4-6 English teachers’ preferred approach regarding the timing of grammatical instruction, developed and distinguished by Spada and Lightbown (2008) as isolated and integrated form-focused instruction (FFI). Both isolated FFI and integrated FFI are described as taking place in primarily meaning-based communicative classrooms. They differ in that isolated FFI takes place separately from communicative activities, while integrated FFI occurs during communicative activities. Using this theoretical distinction, Valeo and Spada (2016) developed teacher and learner questionnaires. The teacher questionnaire, along with observations, was used in the current study to investigate the views of teachers in the context of Swedish compulsory school. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the questionnaire and observation data shows a preference for integrated FFI across all grades (grade 4, grade 5 and grade 6). At the same time, many teachers expressed the value of isolated FFI. The views of the teacher in this study align with previous research claiming that isolated and integrated FFI should not be mutually exclusive. Consistent with Valeo and Spada (2016), the teachers of this study pointed out that context, individual pupils and teacher beliefs may have an impact on decisions regarding the timing of grammatical instruction.

This study will explore to what extent familiarity with English accents can influence compulsory school students’ attitudes towards them. Data from questionnaires completed by 98 students were analysed. The results show that the degree of familiarity with the English accent seems to affect the attitude attributed to it. More specifically, the results indicate that a higher degree of familiarity influences the ability to express an attitude. A lower degree of familiarity leads to similar attitudes being given to the accents, which shows a lack of differentiation between them. The results also indicate a bias towards RP. While it is not necessarily harmful, teachers should be aware of this and how their own teaching may influence how different accents are perceived. It is argued that teachers need to intervene in the process of stereotyping which will help develop an awareness of students’ language attitudes. To summarize, it is difficult to draw any wide conclusions from these results due to the study’s scope. Furthermore, the target group is not representative of Swedish compulsory school students as students from the chosen school generally finish with an above-average final grade. Further research is necessary to determine more specifically how familiarity affects attitudes of English accents and if these findings recur in other areas of Sweden where the final grade average is lower.

The aim of the study was to investigate the use of laptops in English language teaching, its benefits and disadvantages. Three classroom observations, six student interviews and three teacher interviews were carried out to answer the study’s research questions, namely, what are the benefits and disadvantages of using laptops in the teaching of English at schools under study? How do teachers solve technical and pedagogical problems related to the use of laptops? What kinds of IT-support and possibility to develop teaching skills required by laptops are available for teachers of English? Results of the study indicate that easy access to authentic English through laptops is a benefit when teaching English at two Swedish compulsory schools and one high school. Furthermore, the study has shown that laptops are beneficial tools when teaching writing proficiency and working with problem-solving tasks in the classroom. The results of the study have also pointed to the disadvantage in the use of laptops during classroom activities, which are caused by students who are engaged in browsing off-task websites. However, a solution to this could be to include these websites into English language learning activities. The data from the interviews with the three English language teachers have provided evidence about different possibilities for IT-support and IT-development for these teachers. This study makes it clear that a successful implementation of one-to-one laptop programs requires teachers who can invest their time and energy into learning new technology, IT-development provided by the school and municipality through courses, workshops and visits at IT-fairs and other schools with one-to-one laptop program as well as a functional IT-support.