Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T19:16:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JeanyAraujoMendesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 8639285 bytes, checksum: 04582afa34b412438a38094bc21a9541 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-04T22:15:25Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JeanyAraujoMendesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 8639285 bytes, checksum: 04582afa34b412438a38094bc21a9541 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-04T22:15:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JeanyAraujoMendesDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 8639285 bytes, checksum: 04582afa34b412438a38094bc21a9541 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-29 / Esta disserta??o insere-se no ?mbito da Perspectiva Textual-Interativa (JUBRAN; KOCH, 2006), que constitui uma vertente da Lingu?stica Textual. A pesquisa tem como prop?sito investigar a estrutura??o dos Segmentos T?picos M?nimos (SegTs m?nimos) em aulas para o ensino m?dio, bem como descrever esse processo. A unidade de an?lise tomada para a consecu??o desses objetivos ? o t?pico discursivo, uma vez que essa categoria permite operar no recorte de segmentos t?picos como tamb?m dos segmentos t?picos m?nimos. Do ponto de vista metodol?gico, o trabalho adotou o m?todo emp?rico-indutivo de an?lise, a partir de uma abordagem qualitativa. Partindo da proposta de investigar como ocorre o processo de estrutura??o interna de SegTs m?nimos (PENHAVEL, 2010) em aulas expositivas (SILVA, 2008), coletamos dados correspondentes a aulas de Biologia, de Geografia, de Hist?ria e de Portugu?s, em uma escola de Ensino M?dio da rede p?blica do estado de Pernambuco. Nessa dire??o, para realizar uma an?lise mais detalhada dos segmentos t?picos m?nimos, selecionamos uma das aulas para an?lise, por considerarmos que ? representativa dentro do conjunto das aulas expositivas. Finalmente, verificamos nas an?lises que o processo de estrutura??o dos SegTs m?nimos, particularmente da aula expositiva, tem como princ?pio geral o encadeamento sequencial de quatro unidades t?picas: Esquematiza??o inicial, Problema(quest?o), Explica??o e Ratifica??o-avalia??o. Al?m dessa, h? outras formas de estrutura??o que se realizam com tr?s, duas ou uma unidade t?pica, cujas bases permanecem no princ?pio geral de estrutura??o dos SegTs m?nimos. Assim, identificamos entre as formas mais recorrentes, SegTs organizados com base no encadeamento sequencial Quest?o-Explica??o-Avalia??o, Esquematiza??o inicial-Explica??o-Avalia??o; ou apenas Esquematiza??o inicial-Explica??o, Explica??o-Avalia??o. H? ainda SegTs estruturados t?o-somente com a unidade de Explica??o que ? a ?nica unidade t?pica de estrutura??o que ocorre em todos os SegTs. / This paper is part of the framework of the Textual-Interactive Grammar or Textual-Interactive Perspective (Jubran, KOCH, 2006), which is a branch of Textual Linguistic. The research aims to investigate the structure of the Minimum Topic segments in classes for high school, and to describe this process. The unit of analysis taken to accomplish these objectives is the discursive topic, because that category will operate in cropping topic segments as well as Minimum Topic segments. From a methodological point of view, the study adopted the empirical-inductive method of analysis from a qualitative approach. From the proposal to investigate how is the internal structuring of Minimum Topic SegTs (PENHAVEL, 2010) in expositive classes (SILVA, 2008), we collected corresponding biology, Geography, History and Portuguese classes, in a public school from Pernambuco. In this direction, to carry out a more detailed analysis of the topic segments, we selected one of the classes for analysis, because we believe that is representative in a set of classes. Finally, we noted in the analysis that the process of internal structuring of minimum SegTs, particularly the expositive classes, has as a general principle of structuring the sequential chaining four topical units: Outlining initial, Problem (question), Explanation and Ratification-assessment. In addition to this, there are other ways of structuring carried out with three, two or one topical unit but they based on the general principle of structuring of minimum SegTs. Thus, we identified among the most recurrent forms, SegTs are organized with the sequential chaining Question, Explanation, Ratification-assessment; Outlining initial, Explanation, Ratification-assessment; or just Outlining initial, Explanation, Ratification-assessment; Explanation, Ratification-assessment. There are still SegTs structured only with the Explanation unit. Furthermore, it is the only topic unit that occurs in all SegTs.

Submitted by PPG Medicina e Ci?ncias da Sa?de (medicina-pg@pucrs.br) on 2017-12-26T13:20:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RENATO_FRANZ_MATTA_RAMOS_DIS.pdf: 2666471 bytes, checksum: d06c7c4e1ad077c16d8094c35b8872d0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-12-29T10:24:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RENATO_FRANZ_MATTA_RAMOS_DIS.pdf: 2666471 bytes, checksum: d06c7c4e1ad077c16d8094c35b8872d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-29T10:33:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RENATO_FRANZ_MATTA_RAMOS_DIS.pdf: 2666471 bytes, checksum: d06c7c4e1ad077c16d8094c35b8872d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-31 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Introduction: Cicatrization is a tissue response to damage, an inflammatory process or cell necrosis. The LED (Light Emitted Diode) is a topic phototherapy that can improve the wound healing process. Objective: To compare the cicatrization with and without the use of LED in patients underwent abdominoplasty. Methods: A double-blinded, non-controlled, non-randomized clinical trial. There were included patients who underwent abdominoplasty between 2014 and 2016 from the plastic surgery department. After 48 hours the LED treatment began, applying it only in the right side, every other day for ten sessions. The monofilament test was applied at days 2, 4, 6, 14 and 21. After one a six months, there were applied the Vancouver and Draaijers scales by two independent observers. At sixth month post-operative, there were taken standardized photographs of the scars and other two independent observers evaluated them. At twelve months post-operative, the patients responded two questionnaires about the aesthetic and sensitivity result of the scars. Results: There were 23 patients who underwent this surgery, 17 had complete evaluations and follow-up (lost of 26%). Only 14 (82%) patients had standardized photographs. After one year, just the 65% (11 patients) answered the questionnaires. When analyzing the final result of the scar at six months according the Vancouver and Draaijers scales, it was obtained a major numeric value to the left side (no treated side), it corresponded to a worst scar (p=0.003). It was obtained a less pain and uncomfortable sensation in all patients at sixth month post-operative with the monofilaments test, more frequently in the treated right side. According the standardized photographs, the right side was chosen as better scar aesthetically (p=0.008). Finally, according the questionnaires, there were no differences in the aesthetic (p=0.083) and sensitivity (p=0.564) results between the two sides. Conclusions: Cicatrization with the use of LED was better on the treated side according to the Vancouver and Draaijers scales and the standardized photographs. The monofilaments test showed a global improvement. The patients didn?t find differences on the aesthetic and the sensitivity results after one-year post-operative. / Introdu??o: A cicatriza??o ? uma resposta tecidual a um ferimento, a processos inflamat?rios ou at? mesmo ? necrose celular. O LED (Light Emitted Diode), ? uma fototerapia t?pica que pode melhorar o processo cicatricial. Objetivo: Comparar a cicatriza??o com e sem o uso do LED em paciente submetidas a abdominoplastia. M?todos: Ensaio cl?nico, duplo cego, n?o controlado e n?o randomizado. Foram inclu?dos pacientes submetidos a abdominoplastia entre 2014 e 2016 que compareceram ao servi?o de cirurgia pl?stica. Ap?s 48 horas da cirurgia, foi aplicado o tratamento com LED, a penas do lado direito, a cada 2 dias por 10 sess?es. Foi aplicado o teste de monofilamentos nos dias 2, 4, 6, 14, 21. Ao cumprir um m?s e seis meses da cirurgia, foram aplicadas as escalas de Vancouver e Draaijers por dois observadores independentes. Ao seis meses fotografias padronizadas das cicatrizes foram realizadas e avaliadas por outros dois observadores independentes. Aos 12 meses da cirurgia, os pacientes responderam um question?rio sobre o resultado est?tico e sensibilidade da cicatriz. Resultados: Foram realizadas 23 cirurgias, 17 pacientes com avalia??o e acompanhamento completo (perda de 26%); 14 (82%) tiveram fotografias padronizadas. Ao ano, 65% (11 pacientes) responderam os question?rios. Segundo a escala de Vancouver e Draaijers aos 6 meses; foi obtido um valor num?rico maior ao lado esquerdo (n?o tratado), ou seja uma cicatriz de pior apar?ncia (p=0.003). Com o teste de monofilamentos houve melhora na sensa??o de dor ou desconforto aos seis meses em todos os casos. Segundo as fotografias padronizadas, o lado direito foi escolhido como melhor resultado est?tico (p=0.008). Finalmente, segundo os question?rios, n?o houve diferen?a no resultado est?tico (p=0.083) nem sobre a sensibilidade da cicatriz ap?s um ano da cirurgia (p=0.564). Conclus?es: A cicatriza??o com o uso do LED foi melhor do lado tratado segundo as escalas de avalia??o da cicatriza??o e segundo as fotografias padronizadas. O teste de monofilamentos de avalia??o da dor neurop?tica mostrou melhora em todos os casos. As pr?prias pacientes n?o encontraram diferen?as na sua avalia??o subjetiva ao ano da cirurgia respeito ao resultado.

Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-11-01T18:04:06Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2015 - Jalber Luiz da Silva.pdf: 1694584 bytes, checksum: b5150f88c573af2e6a10fb0fb41c57c9 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-01T18:04:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2015 - Jalber Luiz da Silva.pdf: 1694584 bytes, checksum: b5150f88c573af2e6a10fb0fb41c57c9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-05-20 / CNPq / This text aims to present my interest in the occurrence of research and identification of forms of prejudice and discrimination against the knowledge and ability of Brazilian religions of African origin in school units of basic education. Of particular interest to analyze episodes of discrimination, directly or indirectly, by the denial, silencing and exclusion that knowledge in teaching practices and syllabus of basic education, especially knowledge inherent to its manifestations and religious knowledge. In the search field, the maroon community of Santa Rita do Bracu? in Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro; I follow a process of continuing education of teachers of a public school, discussions of Education of Etnicorraciais Relations. Debating, investigated the Quilombo, the "death" of the religious knowledge of Cumba Master3 and Jongo wheel and can evaluate the various forms of discrimination existing in this community and in your school. / Este texto tem como objetivo apresentar meu interesse na investiga??o de ocorr?ncia e identifica??o das formas de preconceito e discrimina??o contra os conhecimentos e saberes das religi?es brasileiras de matriz africana em unidades escolares da educa??o b?sica. Interessa especialmente analisar epis?dios de discrimina??o, de maneira direta ou indireta, mediante a nega??o, o silenciamento e a exclus?o desse conhecimento nas pr?ticas de ensino e conte?dos program?ticos da educa??o b?sica, principalmente conhecimentos inerentes ?s suas manifesta??es e saberes religiosos. No campo de pesquisa, a comunidade quilombola de Santa Rita do Bracu?, em Angra dos Reis-RJ, acompanho um processo de forma??o continuada de professores de uma escola municipal, as discuss?es sobre Educa??o das Rela??es Etnicorraciais. Problematizando, investiguei no Quilombo, a ?morte? dos conhecimentos religiosos do Mestre Cumba2 e da Roda do Jongo, podendo avaliar as diversas formas de discrimina??o existentes nessa comunidade e na sua escola.