Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-03-07T19:26:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 rafaelaraujooliveiragomes.pdf: 586480 bytes, checksum: 7ba104188999890890375682d8b5e2c7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-03-10T12:57:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 rafaelaraujooliveiragomes.pdf: 586480 bytes, checksum: 7ba104188999890890375682d8b5e2c7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-10T12:57:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 rafaelaraujooliveiragomes.pdf: 586480 bytes, checksum: 7ba104188999890890375682d8b5e2c7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-01-08 / A memória é considerada como um processo psicológico chave. Nas últimas duas décadas muitas visões diferentes de como a memória é representada e organizada foram apresentadas. No século XIX, Wilhelm Wundt conduziu um número de experimentos sobre a memória que parecem ter sido negligenciados por psicólogos cognitivos modernos e neurocientistas. Neste trabalho, conceitos fundamentais do sistema de Wundt são revisados (objeto e método de psicologia, mente e causalidade psíquica) e algumas de suas investigações experimentais sobre a memória são expostas. A perspectiva wundtiana reflete uma estrita aderência a um método firmemente calcado num abordagem teórica onde a memória está inserida em um projeto de pesquisa sobre a exploração da experiência consciente. Esta revisão da abordagem wundtiana sobre a memória objetiva também relacionar a psicologia da memória de Wundt com as pesquisas contemporâneas em psicologia do desenvolvimento e fornecer algumas questões para o debate sobre o conceito de memória, sua natureza e sua relação com fenômenos como a consciência. / Memory is considered a key psychological process. Over the past two decades, several different views of how memory is represented and organized have been proposed. In 19th century Wilhelm Wundt conducted a number of memory experiments that seems to have been neglected for some time of modern cognitive psychologists and neurocientists. In this work core concepts of Wundt´s system are reviewed (object and method of psychology, mind and causality psychic) and his experimental work on memory is exposed. The Wundtian perspective reflects a strict adherence to a method firmly grounded in a theoretical framework in which memory is inserted in a research project to exploring the conscious experience. This review of Wundt´s approach to memory is intented also related the Wundt´s memory psychology with the modern research in development psychology on memory and provide some questions to debate about the concept of memory, his nature and relation with phenomena like consciousness.

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-05-25T14:51:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 cintiafernandesmarcellos.pdf: 812510 bytes, checksum: 0a05518f03ae1808a5ebeac669f3f82d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-07-02T11:55:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 cintiafernandesmarcellos.pdf: 812510 bytes, checksum: 0a05518f03ae1808a5ebeac669f3f82d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-02T11:55:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 cintiafernandesmarcellos.pdf: 812510 bytes, checksum: 0a05518f03ae1808a5ebeac669f3f82d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-02-03 / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / O objetivo do presente trabalho é comparar as definições de objeto e método nos projetos de psicologia experimental de Wilhelm Wundt e Edward Titchener. Tendo em vista as aproximações equivocadas entre os autores presentes nos manuais de psicologia e a escassez de estudos mais sistemáticos acerca da obra de Titchener, em especial no cenário nacional, as comparações entre as idéias de ambos, disponíveis na literatura secundária, ainda não foram suficientes para demonstrar as diferenças entre suas propostas. Frente a este panorama, propõe-se uma comparação das definições de objeto e método da psicologia, especificamente nas obras que representam o período de maturidade das idéias de Wundt, com aquelas que caracterizam a expressão clássica do estruturalismo de Titchener. A tese central é que, em função dos distintos pressupostos teóricos, as noções de experiência humana e do domínio do psíquico adquirem um diferente significado no pensamento de cada autor, configurando com isso diferentes objetos de estudo para a psicologia e, consequentemente, uma diferente compreensão acerca das possibilidades e limites do método experimental. / The aim of this work is to compare the definitions of subject and method introduced in Wilhelm Wundt‟s and Edward Titchener‟s projects of experimental psychology. Considering the mistaken proximity between the authors which is found in handbooks of psychology and the shortage of more systematic studies about Titchener‟s work, especially in the Brazilian context, the comparisons between the ideas of both authors, available in the secondary literature, they still have not been sufficient to demonstrate the differences between their proposals. Due to this situation, it is proposed a comparison of the definitions of subject and method in psychology, specifically in the works which represent the period of maturity of Wundt‟s ideas, with those ones which characterize the classical expression of Titchener‟s structuralism. The central thesis is, in function of the distinct theoretical assumptions, the notions of the human experience and the realm of the psychic acquire a different meaning in the thought of each author, forming this way different subjects of study and, consequently, a different understanding about the possibilities and limits of the experimental method.

Submitted by Cristiane de Melo Shirayama (cristiane.shirayama@unifesp.br) on 2018-05-09T18:51:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO_Laís Fernanda Rodrigues.pdf: 832795 bytes, checksum: 0fd40b425f29acb06274171d9e43fed5 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Cristiane de Melo Shirayama (cristiane.shirayama@unifesp.br) on 2018-05-10T20:06:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO_Laís Fernanda Rodrigues.pdf: 832795 bytes, checksum: 0fd40b425f29acb06274171d9e43fed5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-10T20:06:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO_Laís Fernanda Rodrigues.pdf: 832795 bytes, checksum: 0fd40b425f29acb06274171d9e43fed5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03-14 / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / O presente trabalho consiste em analisar a trajetória intelectual e institucional de Émile Durkheim para compreender a apropriação que fez da psicologia experimental de Wilhelm Wundt em suas obras. Para isso, também consiste na análise da trajetória de Théodule Ribot, percursor da psicologia científica na França e divulgador da teoria de Wundt. Da mesma forma, o trabalho analisa as mudanças institucionais das faculdades da França, assim como as mudanças políticas que decorreram da Guerra Franco-Prussiana e a instituição da Terceira República, fundamentais para compreender a apropriação de teorias alemãs no período. / The present work analyzes the the intellectual and institutional trajectory of Émile Durkheim to understand the appropriation he made of Wilhelm Wundt’s experimental psychology in his works. For this reason, this work also analyzes the trajectory of Théodule Ribot, precursor of scientific psychology in France and popularizer of Wundt’s theory. In order to do that, the work analyzes the institutional changes of the universities of France, as well as the political changes that resulted from the Franco-Prussian War and the establishment of the Third Republic, fundamental to understand the appropriation of German theories in the period.

Der Physiologe und Philosoph Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) gilt als eine der Gründerfiguren der modernen experimentellen Psychologie. Sein im Universitätsarchiv Leipzig lagernder Nachlass ist von großer wissenschaftshistorischer Bedeutung. Der vorliegende Text stellt diesen Nachlass - Umfang, Struktur, Dokumente von besonderem Interesse, Übersicht über die Korrespondenzpartner usw. - vor und schildert kurz dessen Erschließung und Digitalisierung im Rahmen eines von 2013 bis 2015/16 in Kooperation mit der Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig durchgeführten DFG-Projekts.

Scholarship on Dada and Surrealism has established that psychology was a major intellectual source for artists in both groups. However, a burgeoning amount of recent work in both the history of art and of science indicates that types of psychology other than psychoanalysis permeated the historical context of the avant-garde. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, physiological psychology, for example, was the dominant science of the body and mind, which grounded psychic phenomena in structures of conduction in the nervous system. Modern artists saw within this discourse a fascinating and new theory of experience. In my selective history of the avant-garde’s reception and response to physiological psychology, I will argue that artists worked within and partially according to the basic tenets of this discourse, but that they reshaped its superstructural projections away from formations and taxonomies of normalcy in consciousness and action. / text