Not available / text

University of Macau / Faculty of Arts and Humanities / Department of Chinese

No description available.

No description available.

本論文係以「原本玉篇」殘卷為對象，擇該書所引述「說文」與今傳「二徐本說文」 二者之間，正其是非，題曰：「原本玉篇引述唐以前舊本說文考異」。文都二十萬言 ，本論析為七章，係以「原本玉篇」所存七卷作為區分，其前為緒論，其後乃結語。 所用「原本玉篇」之材料，乃日本「東方文化叢書第六」之複製本，不足者以羅振玉 及楊守敬刊本補足之，並輯入少數他書所存錄者；總存字二０九二字，所引述「說文 」者，凡一二六一條，引者八二一條，述者四四０條，其引「說文」之八二一條中， 與今「二徐本說文」相較而合者，唯二六０條耳，其異者達五六一條。考校之結果， 今「二徐本說文」是而「原本玉篇」非者，固亦有之，然今本誤者則佔絕大部份，可 見「原本玉篇」之可貴也。今「二徐本說文」之誤，就說解言：有形誤者、音誤者、 誤倒者、誤置者、誤羨者、竄入者、漏奪者；甚收字：有失數者、誤增者、誤合者、 誤分者、誤置部首者，亦有形體 謬者。而尤要者，則可知今「二徐本說文」亦有據 「原本玉篇」而改竄之痕跡也。

本論文凡分五章，首章緒論，綜述南北朝代之背景與其文學發展的狀況，以見其對庾 信行誼與作品之影響。 次章評傳，介紹庾信之鄉里世系與生平事蹟，于其先世又著╲重仕宦之系統，以見其 生長背。景而其個人生平又配合作品之創作，分為三期。並述及家庭、交遊、思想、 學殖，以與其作品互相印證。然後引述其文學創作在多方面的成就。 第三章庾信辭賦之分篇研究，除劃分前後兩期外，各篇又就其結構內容與主要特色， 加以分析比較，以見其創作技巧與特殊表現。 第四章庾信辭賦之特色與比較，再就其十五篇賦，加以綜合分析比較，以探討庾信寫 作之一貫特色與不同的改變，由此更反復印證其生平與作品的息息相關。以期於庾信 作品有更完整之認識與瞭解。 末章結論，主要在評分介庾信于文學史上的地位與影響。首節與徐陵並論，以見南朝 文壇之風氣。次節與王褒並提，以見北方文壇受南人的影響。末節則說明庾信于後世 文學之重影響。

Es wird vielfach postuliert, dass Erwartungen Bedeutung für den Verlauf und die Ergebnisse einer medizinischen Rehabilitationsmaßnahme haben (vgl. Deck, 1999; Deck, Zimmermann, Kohlmann & Raspe, 1998b; Faller, Vogel & Bosch, 2000; Hafen, Bengel, Jastrebow & Nübling, 2000; Kühn, Pannicke, Mohs & Schneider, 2001). Im ersten Teil der Arbeit wird diese Thematik aus einer gesundheitspsychologischen Perspektive untersucht. Die sozial-kognitive Theorie von Bandura (1997) wird gewählt, in der Erwartungen wie Ergebnis- und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen als zentrale Prädiktoren von gesundheitlichen Ergebnissen angesehen werden. Diese Theorie vermag den Einfluss von Erwartungen auf Gesundheitsverhalten und den Gesundheitszustand zu erklären und zugleich auch die Bildung von Erwartungen zu beschreiben. Auch wenn Ergebniserwartungen die Behandlungsergebnisse vorhersagen, können Diskrepanzen zwischen den anfänglichen Erwartungen der Patienten und ihren Behandlungsergebnissen vorliegen. Aus einer Selbstregulationsperspektive wird angenommen, dass unerwartet schlechte Behandlungsergebnisse möglicherweise negative emotionale und motivationale Folgen haben, die sich auf den weiteren Rehabilitationsprozess auswirken. Zur Erklärung dieser Effekte wird im zweiten Teil der Arbeit ein Modell vorgestellt, das die zentralen Konstrukte und Annahmen der sozial-kognitiven Theory von Bandura (1997; Marlatt & Gordon, 1985), der Selbstregulationstheorie von Carver and Scheier (1998) und der kognitiv-transaktionalen Stresstheorie von Lazarus (1991) vereint. Die Daten der zweiten multizentrischen MSK-QMS Studie zur stationären Rehabilitation nach Hüftgelenkersatz bot als Längsschnittstudie die Möglichkeit, die Fragestellungen beider Teile der Arbeit empirisch zu untersuchen. An dieser Studie nahmen 1065 Rehabilitanden nach Hüftgelenkersatz teil. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen, dass positive Ergebniserwartungen und hohe Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen gute Behandlungsergebnisse bei Patienten einer stationären Rehabilitationsmaßnahme nach Hüftgelenkersatz vorhersagen. Weitere Analysen zeigen, dass die Erwartungen zu Reha-Beginn durch verschiedene direkte und symbolische Erfahrungen sowie Indikatoren des körperlichen und emotionalen Zustandes beeinflusst werden. Darüber hinaus haben Diskrepanzen zwischen anfänglichen Erwartungen und Behandlungsergebnissen (indirekte) emotionale sowie (direkte und indirekte) motivationale Effekte. Die Befunde werden theoretisch eingebettet und theoriegestützt interpretiert. Praktische Konsequenzen werden abgeleitet. / There is a growing body of literature emphasizing that expectations have effects on the process and outcomes of an inpatient rehabilitation (cp. Deck, 1999; Deck, Zimmermann, Kohlmann & Raspe, 1998b; Faller, Vogel & Bosch, 2000; Hafen, Bengel, Jastrebow & Nübling, 2000; Kühn, Pannicke, Mohs & Schneider, 2001). The first part of the present thesis examines this issue from a health psychology perspective. The social-cognitive theory of Bandura (1997) is chosen that postulates expectations such as outcome expectancies and perceived self-efficacy as main predictors of health outcomes. This theory is able to explain how expectations affect health behaviour and health outcomes and how expectations are formed. Even though outcome expectations predict health outcomes, patients may experience discrepancies between their initial expectations and their later health outcomes. From a self-regulation perspective it is assumed that the experience of unexpected worse health outcomes may have negative emotional and motivational consequences that affect the further process of rehabilitation. To describe these effects a model is introduced in the second part of the thesis that includes main constructs and assumptions of the social-cognitive theory of Bandura (1997; Marlatt & Gordon, 1985), the self-regulation theory of Carver and Scheier (1998) and the cognitiv-transactional theory of Lazarus (1991). In both parts of the thesis research questions are derived that are tested in a longitudinal study (MSK-QMS study). The participants are 1065 adult inpatients who had undergone elective total hip replacement surgery. The results confirm that positive outcome expectations and high perceived self-efficacy predicted better health outcomes in inpatients after hip replacement surgery. Further analyses indicate, that patients'' expectations at admission are affected by several direct and symbolic experiences as well as different indicators of physical and emotional states. Moreover, discrepancies between initial outcome expectations and later health outcomes have (indirect) emotional and (direct and indirect) motivational effects. The results are theory based interpreted. Practical consequences are derived.

葉天賜. / "2003年8月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 177-189). / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 8 yue". / Ye Tianci. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 177-189). / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / 論文提要 / Chapter 第一章 --- 導論 --- p.´þ / Chapter 第二章 --- 元代徽州理學的發展 --- p.（8) / Chapter 第一節 --- 南宋末的徽州儒學 --- p.（8) / Chapter 第二節 --- 元代的徽州儒學 --- p.（13) / Chapter 第三章 --- 鄭玉的生平與學術思想 --- p.（51) / Chapter 第一節 --- 鄭玉的生平及其出處問題之討論 --- p.（55) / Chapter 第二節 --- 鄭玉的“春秋學´ح和《春秋闕疑》 --- p.（66) / Chapter 第三節 --- 鄭玉的儒學思想 --- p.（83) / Chapter 第四章 --- 趙汸的生平與學術思想 --- p.（100) / Chapter 第一節 --- 趙汸的生平與著述 --- p.（100) / Chapter 第二節 --- 趙汸的“春秋學´ح --- p.（111) / Chapter 第三節 --- 趙汸的儒學思想 --- p.（144) / Chapter 第五章 --- 結語 --- p.（173) / 參考書目 --- p.（178)

Many causes have been proposed for the transition to agriculture but how can archaeologists debate rival interpretations of the record with a seat-of-your-pants theoretical methodology? Truth is a concept that has been the subject of considerable thought and analysis by philosophers for millennia and is a conceptual resource that archaeologists can draw on. The aim of this thesis is twofold. Firstly, the aim is to study the epistemological criteria used in the formulation and assessment of archaeological knowledge: bringing new understanding of knowledge formation in archaeology and how to deal with competing interpretations of the past (specifically with political and ethical ramifications). The second aim is to assess these epistemological criteria and position them in light of the literature on philosophical theories of truth. The focus of this thesis is on the justification project which attempts to identify a characteristic which is possessed by most true propositions and not possessed by most false propositions. In other words, what it is that makes certain statements about the past 'true' or 'not true'. The aim is to understand how archaeological claims about the past come to be made and against what grounds these claims are justified. Three angles are used to answer the aims of this thesis. Firstly, looking at archaeological interpretation in the field, the case study of Çatalhöyük in Turkey is used to track interpretation from excavation through to publication. Secondly, looking at justification in larger syntheses of the past, different explanations for the emergence of agriculture in Britain are explored to understand how justification works at this level of archaeological interpretation, especially when dealing with multiple explanations. Finally, the ethical and political consequences of archaeological justification are discussed. Given the acceptance that there are different interpretations of the past beyond solely the archaeologists, how does justification work in archaeology when we include other interpretations of the past and when concerns shift away from reaching the most justified account of the past, to the practical ramifications of that knowledge? This thesis original and novel contribution is in answering these aims. In the next chapters it will be argued that archaeological justification works within a specific model of justification based on correspondence and coherence. Justification shifts as interpretation moves away from the archaeological record; there is a heavier reliance on abductive reasoning. Multiple interpretations are a product of abductive reasoning and due to the adoption of different theoretical stances. Archaeology fits within a pragmatist theory of truth showing that ethical and political issues are part of the process of justification.

No description available.