The concept evolves in two layers, in response to nature of the location and the theme. Characteristics of the floodplain forest landscape in the basin of river Morava and the essence of archeologicaly valuable area. Museum is a longitudinal object, in local landscape as natural as a tree-trunk drifted ashore in a spring submersion. The volume of the archeological centre is attached loosely as a branch captured by its weight. Orientation of the museum provides a composed view of the archeological park.

Stonehenge is a place of mystery and wonder, where it stands as a last witness to long forgotten religious practices and rituals, and its sophisticated stone structure still makes a huge impression after over 4000 years. And it raises questions as to how it was built, and why? Stonehenge is today one of the world`s most famous megalithic monument in the world, and in its right. But Stonehenge is more than just big stones;it has a much longer and richer history than that. Stonehenge also has many surrounding monuments, from the same time period, and thought of as today, to coexist and fill different, specific functions, as a ritual landscape. The more archaeologists learn about Stonehenge, the more complex the picture gets. Today, the understanding of Stonehenge lies just as much in the surrounding landscape, as in the monument itself.

O arroio Touro-passo localiza-se no município de Uruguaiana, na fronteira oeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Nas décadas de 1960 e 1970, a região foi palco de importantes estudos arqueológicos como parte do Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas (PRONAPA) e do Programa Paleoindígena (PROPA). A coordenação dos trabalhos ficou a cargo do arqueólogo Eurico Th. Miller, do Museu Arqueológico do Rio Grande do Sul (MARSUL), instalado em Taquara-RS, e do apoio técnico-financeiro do Smithsonian Institute, com sede em Washington-EUA. As ferramentas teórico-metodológicas empregadas na época favoreciam a localização de sítios arqueológicos do período pré-colonial, e o estabelecimento de filiações culturais para as indústrias líticas e cerâmicas a partir do postulado das “Tradições” e “Fases” arqueológicas. No entanto, decorridos mais de quarenta anos destas pesquisas, a região não havia sido estudada novamente. Desta forma, novas teorias e metodologias foram incorporadas neste estudo, a fim de fomentar novas discussões sobre o tema dos sítios arqueológicos na região. Este trabalho desenvolve-se à luz da Arqueologia Espacial, embasando-se em documentos primários e pesquisas de campo realizadas entre os anos de 2000 a 2015. O resultado é um reordenamento da questão das espacialidades, identificando-se sítios sem ocupações como „locais‟ arqueológicos‟, e sítios ocupados como „lugares‟ arqueológicos. Os termos foram incorporados do campo semântico da Geografia, e ao textualizar-se as espacialidades no arroio Touro-passo, evita-se o equívoco em considerar os sítios localizados no período do PROPA como as únicas referências cronológicas, estratigráficas e culturais para a arqueologia de caçadores-coletores na área em estudo. / The Touro-passo stream is located in Uruguaiana, the west frontier in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. In the 60s and 70s, important archeological studies were carried out in this region as part of the National Program of Archeological Studies (called PRONAPA) and the Paleo-Indigenous Program (called PROPA). The studies were led by the archeologist Eurico Th. Miller from the Archeological Museum in Rio Grande de Sul (called MARSUL), located in Taquara RS, as well as the technical-financial support by the Smithsonian Institute from Washington-USA. The theoretical-methodological tools used in the past helped to find pre-colonial archeological sites and to create cultural filiations for the lithic and pottery industries based on the archeological “Traditions” and “Periods”. However, more than 40 years after the studies, the region had not been studies again. This, new theories and methodologies were incorporated in this current stdudy in order to start new discussions about the archeological sites in the region. This study was developed based on the Spatial Archeology with primary documents and field research that happened between 2000 and 2015. The result is a spatial reorder and there are non-occupied sites identified as “archeological spots” as well as occupied sites identified as “archeological places”. These words were included in the Geography vocabulary and, while referring to the Touro-passo stream, the sites found during the PROPA period are not considered the unique chronological, stratigraphic and cultural references to the archeology of collector-hunters in the studies area.

O arroio Touro-passo localiza-se no município de Uruguaiana, na fronteira oeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Nas décadas de 1960 e 1970, a região foi palco de importantes estudos arqueológicos como parte do Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas (PRONAPA) e do Programa Paleoindígena (PROPA). A coordenação dos trabalhos ficou a cargo do arqueólogo Eurico Th. Miller, do Museu Arqueológico do Rio Grande do Sul (MARSUL), instalado em Taquara-RS, e do apoio técnico-financeiro do Smithsonian Institute, com sede em Washington-EUA. As ferramentas teórico-metodológicas empregadas na época favoreciam a localização de sítios arqueológicos do período pré-colonial, e o estabelecimento de filiações culturais para as indústrias líticas e cerâmicas a partir do postulado das “Tradições” e “Fases” arqueológicas. No entanto, decorridos mais de quarenta anos destas pesquisas, a região não havia sido estudada novamente. Desta forma, novas teorias e metodologias foram incorporadas neste estudo, a fim de fomentar novas discussões sobre o tema dos sítios arqueológicos na região. Este trabalho desenvolve-se à luz da Arqueologia Espacial, embasando-se em documentos primários e pesquisas de campo realizadas entre os anos de 2000 a 2015. O resultado é um reordenamento da questão das espacialidades, identificando-se sítios sem ocupações como „locais‟ arqueológicos‟, e sítios ocupados como „lugares‟ arqueológicos. Os termos foram incorporados do campo semântico da Geografia, e ao textualizar-se as espacialidades no arroio Touro-passo, evita-se o equívoco em considerar os sítios localizados no período do PROPA como as únicas referências cronológicas, estratigráficas e culturais para a arqueologia de caçadores-coletores na área em estudo. / The Touro-passo stream is located in Uruguaiana, the west frontier in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. In the 60s and 70s, important archeological studies were carried out in this region as part of the National Program of Archeological Studies (called PRONAPA) and the Paleo-Indigenous Program (called PROPA). The studies were led by the archeologist Eurico Th. Miller from the Archeological Museum in Rio Grande de Sul (called MARSUL), located in Taquara RS, as well as the technical-financial support by the Smithsonian Institute from Washington-USA. The theoretical-methodological tools used in the past helped to find pre-colonial archeological sites and to create cultural filiations for the lithic and pottery industries based on the archeological “Traditions” and “Periods”. However, more than 40 years after the studies, the region had not been studies again. This, new theories and methodologies were incorporated in this current stdudy in order to start new discussions about the archeological sites in the region. This study was developed based on the Spatial Archeology with primary documents and field research that happened between 2000 and 2015. The result is a spatial reorder and there are non-occupied sites identified as “archeological spots” as well as occupied sites identified as “archeological places”. These words were included in the Geography vocabulary and, while referring to the Touro-passo stream, the sites found during the PROPA period are not considered the unique chronological, stratigraphic and cultural references to the archeology of collector-hunters in the studies area.

O arroio Touro-passo localiza-se no município de Uruguaiana, na fronteira oeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Nas décadas de 1960 e 1970, a região foi palco de importantes estudos arqueológicos como parte do Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas (PRONAPA) e do Programa Paleoindígena (PROPA). A coordenação dos trabalhos ficou a cargo do arqueólogo Eurico Th. Miller, do Museu Arqueológico do Rio Grande do Sul (MARSUL), instalado em Taquara-RS, e do apoio técnico-financeiro do Smithsonian Institute, com sede em Washington-EUA. As ferramentas teórico-metodológicas empregadas na época favoreciam a localização de sítios arqueológicos do período pré-colonial, e o estabelecimento de filiações culturais para as indústrias líticas e cerâmicas a partir do postulado das “Tradições” e “Fases” arqueológicas. No entanto, decorridos mais de quarenta anos destas pesquisas, a região não havia sido estudada novamente. Desta forma, novas teorias e metodologias foram incorporadas neste estudo, a fim de fomentar novas discussões sobre o tema dos sítios arqueológicos na região. Este trabalho desenvolve-se à luz da Arqueologia Espacial, embasando-se em documentos primários e pesquisas de campo realizadas entre os anos de 2000 a 2015. O resultado é um reordenamento da questão das espacialidades, identificando-se sítios sem ocupações como „locais‟ arqueológicos‟, e sítios ocupados como „lugares‟ arqueológicos. Os termos foram incorporados do campo semântico da Geografia, e ao textualizar-se as espacialidades no arroio Touro-passo, evita-se o equívoco em considerar os sítios localizados no período do PROPA como as únicas referências cronológicas, estratigráficas e culturais para a arqueologia de caçadores-coletores na área em estudo. / The Touro-passo stream is located in Uruguaiana, the west frontier in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. In the 60s and 70s, important archeological studies were carried out in this region as part of the National Program of Archeological Studies (called PRONAPA) and the Paleo-Indigenous Program (called PROPA). The studies were led by the archeologist Eurico Th. Miller from the Archeological Museum in Rio Grande de Sul (called MARSUL), located in Taquara RS, as well as the technical-financial support by the Smithsonian Institute from Washington-USA. The theoretical-methodological tools used in the past helped to find pre-colonial archeological sites and to create cultural filiations for the lithic and pottery industries based on the archeological “Traditions” and “Periods”. However, more than 40 years after the studies, the region had not been studies again. This, new theories and methodologies were incorporated in this current stdudy in order to start new discussions about the archeological sites in the region. This study was developed based on the Spatial Archeology with primary documents and field research that happened between 2000 and 2015. The result is a spatial reorder and there are non-occupied sites identified as “archeological spots” as well as occupied sites identified as “archeological places”. These words were included in the Geography vocabulary and, while referring to the Touro-passo stream, the sites found during the PROPA period are not considered the unique chronological, stratigraphic and cultural references to the archeology of collector-hunters in the studies area.

No description available.

Remiantis aprašomuoju - analitiniu, istoriniu, lyginamuoju, apklausos, atvejų analizės ir archeologinio paveldo kartografavimo metodais, darbe nagrinėjamas vidurio Žemaitijoje (Plungės, Telšių ir Šilalės savivaldybių teritorijoje) esančio archeologinio paveldo išteklių turistinis potencialas ir galimos vystymosi kryptys kultūrinio turizmo kontekste. Sąlygiškai darbas gali būti skirstomas į tris dalis: pirmojoje dalyje grindžiamas Žemaitijos regiono (kitų Lietuvos etnografinių regionų kontekste) kaip šios rūšies paveldo panaudojimo turizmui pasirinkimas. Jis apima tris pagrindinius poţiūrius: geografinį, istorinį ir etnoso. Antrojoje dalyje pristatomi vidurio Žemaitijoje esančio archeologinis paveldas, jo charakteringiausi bruožai ir buvusi funkcinė paskirtis. Turizmo paveldo ištekliai iliustruojami savarankiškai išskirto archeologinio paveldo kompleksų atvejais, jų galima panauda turizmui bei rekreacijai. Iš viso vietovėje išskirti 8 archeologinio paveldo objektų kompleksai. Trečiojoje darbo dalyje pristatoma teorinė, traktuojama valstybiniu mastu kultūrinio turizmo plėtros bazė, akcentuojamas dokumentuose išskirto Vidurio Žemaitijos arealo turistinis potencialas. Šioje dalyje pristatoma esama archeologinio paveldo būklės bei objektų lankymo (nelankymo) situacija, iš dalies tai lemiančius veiksnius. Šiame darbe nagrinėjami apsibrėžtame Žemaitijos regione esantys ikikrikščioniškųjų laikų objektai, atspindintys senųjų žemaičių kultūrą bei pasaulėžiūrą, jų kompleksiškumas... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / According to a descriptive - analytical, historical, comparative, interview, case studies and archaeological heritage mapping techniques, there is pending in the middle of Samogitia (in Plungė, Telšiai and Šilalė municipalities) founded archaeological heritage resources, its tourist potential and possible directions of development in cultural tourism context. Work can be conditionally divided into the three parts: in the first part Samogitia’s region (in the other Lithuania’s ethnographic regions context) is based by arguments to use archeological heritage in the tourism of Lithuania. It includes three main approaches: geographical, historical and ethnos. The second part presents the middle Samogitia’s region archaeological heritage, its most characteristic features and past function. In the tourism usable archaeological heritage resources is illustrated independently abstracted complex of archaeological heritage cases, their future use for tourism and recreation. Totally there were identified eight sites of archaeological heritage facilities. The third part presents the theoretical base, considered in the state and municipalities levels: these documents are focused on the middle of Samogitia’s tourist potential. This part presents the current condition of archaeological heritage sites, its attendance situation and determinants of it. There are pending restricted Samogitia’s region’s pre-Christian time’s objects, that reflect the old world culture and Samogitians, their... [to full text]

Remiantis aprašomuoju – analitiniu, istoriniu, lyginamuoju, archeologiniu metodais, darbe nagrinėjamas LDK Nemuno piliakalnių gynybinės sistemos archeologinis ir istorinis ištirtumas, bei jo pritaikymo kultūriniam turizmui perspektyvos.Tyrimo objektu pasirinkta viena iš plačiausių archeologinio paveldo sričių – piliakalniai, kurie viduramžiais sudarė Nemuno upės gynybinę sistemą ir buvo pagrindinis gynybos ramstis kovose su Kryžiuočių ordinu. Išlikę piliakalniai yra galingos ir didingos Lietuvos istorijos liudytojai, kurie pasakoja apie šlovingas kovas ir mūšius.Didžioji dalis piliakalnių nėra pritaikyti turizmo reikmėms, turistų dėmesio nestokoja Seredžiaus, Veliuonos Sudargo piliakalnių kompleksai, tačiau visi likę – sunkiai pasiekiami, apaugę medžiais ir krūmais, vizualumas prastas. Tačiau ši piliakalnių sistema turi labai didelę istorinę ir archeologinę vertę, todėl būtina ją sudarančius piliakalnius įtraukti į kultūrinius įvykius (archeologinius festivalius, šventes) vykstančius Lietuvoje ir turistinius maršrutus. / By using descriptive - analytical, historical, comparative and archaeological methods this paper analyzes the archaeological and historical explorations of the defensive systems of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania Nemunas mounds and the possibilities to adapt it for cultural tourism. The main object of this analysis is one of the most extensive areas of archaeological heritage – mounds. In the Middle Ages they made up the defence system of Nemunas river and were the main pillar of defense while fighting against the Teutonic Order. The remaining mounds are the witnesses of the powerful and majestic history of Lithuania. The big part of the mounds are not yet suitable for tourism. Mound complexes of Seredžius, Veliuona and Sudargas are widely visited by tourists, but all the rest are hard to reach and not well maintained. However, this system of mounds are of great historical and archaeological importance, so it is necessary to make these mounds the centre of various cultural events that are taking place in Lithuania.

Dietary patterns has varied throughout history, both due to resource and cultural limitations. In this thesis, a study was conducted to establish the dietary patterns of eight individuals from an early Midieaval gravesite in Rambodal, Östergötland, in order to explain why they were buried there. This was done through stable isotope analysis on collagen extracted from bone and tooth on the buried individuals. The analysis showed that these indviduals had a diet that was mainly based on freshwater fish. This suggests that these people may have been christians, due to the fact that fish was not regarded as meat and therefore you did not have to abstain from it during periods of fasting. Fish also has a strong idealistic position in Christianity. However, the positions of the buried individulas does not correspond with catholic burial traditions. One explanation for this could be that these individuals were orthodox Christians, possibly from Finland or Russia.

A instituição do patrimônio no Brasil, compreendida enquanto práticas de preservação, constitui-se a partir de conexões estabelecidas entre distintos atores e organizações. Divergências, disputas, negociações e consenso conformam tal processo. O estudo aqui exposto compreende a identificação e análise de fragmentos da referida instituição, relativos especificamente ao lugar do patrimônio arqueológico na trajetória e nas práticas do Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico e Artístico Nacional (IPHAN). / Cultural Heritages institution in Brazil, of established connections between different actors and organizations. Disagreements, disputes, negotiations and consensus are part of this process. This study consists of identification and analysis of that institution heritage fragments, related specifically to the archaeological heritage place in the history and practices of the Institute of Historical and Artistic Heritage (IPHAN).