Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-06-08T12:26:50Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Terezinha de Assis Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1987243 bytes, checksum: 7c9ec60e217a6a11e97b56cbd0f7c57b (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-06-08T12:27:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Terezinha de Assis Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1987243 bytes, checksum: 7c9ec60e217a6a11e97b56cbd0f7c57b (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-08T12:27:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Terezinha de Assis Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1987243 bytes, checksum: 7c9ec60e217a6a11e97b56cbd0f7c57b (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-01-30 / This research aims to analyze the literary dystopians 1984, written by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 written by Ray Bradbury observing how these authors presented their reflections about their societies and how the human being was inserted in this context. In this perspective, the goal of this work is to demonstrate how the manipulation of memory and language reflects the contrasts between English and American dystopia in the works mentioned above and how the authors presented their critics to their societies. The discussions have presented theoretical support on the studies of Jacques Le Goff (1990), Maurice Halbwachs (2006) and Paul Ricouer (2008), which have highlighted aspects of memory and language that are common to both works, but were approached differently by their authors. This is justified by the fact that they belonged to different societies and the historical ideological context of post world wars in England and the United States was a determining factor to the emersion of dystopian literature and technological society even if differently in each country. This study also presents an overview on the science fiction, emphasizing the most representative moments of this literary strand in which the novels that make up the corpus of this work are inserted. / Esta pesquisa destina-se a uma análise das obras literárias distópicas 1984 de George Orwell e Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury, observando como os autores apresentaram suas reflexões sobre os caminhos das sociedades e como enxergavam o homem inserido neste contexto. Nesta perspectiva, o objetivo deste trabalho é demonstrar como a manipulação da memória e da linguagem reflete os contrastes entre a distopia inglesa e norte-americana nas obras supracitadas e como os autores formularam suas críticas às sociedades das quais participavam. As discussões apresentadas possuem como suporte teórico os estudos de Jacques Le Goff (1990), Maurice Halbwachs (2006) e Paul Ricouer (2008), os quais permitiram evidenciar aspectos de memória e linguagem que são comuns às duas obras, mas que foram abordados diferentemente por seus autores. Isto se justifica pelo fato de que eles pertenciam a sociedades distintas e o contexto histórico-ideológico pós-guerras mundiais na Inglaterra e Estados Unidos foi fator determinante para a emersão da literatura distópica e da sociedade tecnológica, ainda que de maneira diferente em cada país. Este estudo apresenta ainda um panorama acerca da ficção científica, destacando momentos representativos desta vertente literária na qual se inserem os romances que compõem o corpus deste trabalho.

Cette étude de science politique s’inscrit dans le prolongement d’une thèse effectuée en littérature comparée, intitulée « Entre littérature et philosophie : l’Homme est-il un animal politique ? Physique de la misanthropie » (dirigée par M. F. Monneyron, soutenue en nov. 2013, publiée chez L’Harmattan). Dans cette analyse, il s’agissait de tenter une ébauche de conceptualisation philosophique de la haine de l’humanité en partant du théâtre de la misanthropie pour voir ensuite si les quelques résultats obtenus pouvaient s’appliquer à la littérature concentrationnaire et aux dystopies, deux autres genres littéraires qui forment le terreau naturel de doctrines et de pratiques misanthropes.Quelles sont les déterminations culturelles (mythologiques, religieuses, artistiques, médiatiques) de la misanthropie et de la misologie ? Comment apprécier leurs impacts dans le champ politique des paroles et des actes ? La misanthropie n’est-elle pas un composé de misogynie et de misandrie ? Peut-elle être érotique et créer des réseaux ? Comment se concrétise-t-elle dans les domaines du travail, de l’économie, de la technique, de la guerre, dans les problématiques afférentes aux minorités ? Et la démocratie peut-elle générer de la misanthropie ? / This sociological study draws on a comparative literature thesis entitled « Entre littérature et philosophie : l’Homme est-il un animal politique ? Physique de la misanthropie » (Between literature and philosophy: is Man a political animal? Physics of misanthropy) (defended in Nov. 2013, published by L’Harmattan). In this analysis, the aim was to try to sketch a philosophical draft of the hatred of humanity based on misanthropic theatre before trying to apply the results thus obtained to concentration camp literature and to dystopias, two other genres which form the breeding-ground of misanthropic doctrines and practices. This first thought process allowed giving form to some powerfully material aspects of misanthropy: its geography, its therianthropic productions, its infantile manifestations, its exanthropic phenomenology and its dietetics.In the present political science thesis, our aim is to identify the cultural determinations of misanthropy and misology (be it mythological, religious, artistic or in the media) before reflecting on the impact they might have on the political field of speech or of deeds. Isn’t misanthropy a compound of misogyny and misandry? Can misanthropy be erotic? How does it appear in the realms of work, economy, technique, war or in the issues relating to minorities? Eventually we will ask ourselves to which extent democracy creates misanthropy.

Submitted by admin tede (tede@pucgoias.edu.br) on 2017-05-12T12:54:41Z No. of bitstreams: 1 YURE DE FREITAS PIRES.pdf: 1239854 bytes, checksum: d8a54fb67c48c869478b3188e1d826ef (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-12T12:54:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 YURE DE FREITAS PIRES.pdf: 1239854 bytes, checksum: d8a54fb67c48c869478b3188e1d826ef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-15 / This work contributes to the definition and understanding of the science fiction that both lacks clarification and definition for many admirers or not, both scholars and readers, for confusing a science fiction with other styles, those arising from fantasy, horror, realism, realism Fantastic, among many others. We draw a time line with three works of science fiction to more effectively demonstrate a regency of his art about facts that permeate a reality and imaginary, a science and a literature. Such works as What are The War of the Worlds by H. G. Wells, 1984 by George Orwell and The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury. In addition to the portrayal here as functions that differ from the elements inherited from other literary genres and their transmutations, a question of an element for man throughout his evolutionary process, a war. We use war as the most defining of scientific and technological progress, banks are broadly defined in these three works. And finally, about these requirements, what is more inherent in science fiction is its feedback between the real and imaginative, imaginative and real. / Este trabalho vem colaborar para uma compreensão a mais da ficção científica por leitores a fim de que não confundam a ficção científica com outros estilos, já que essa ficção advém da fantasia, horror, realismo, realismo fantástico, entre diversos outros sedimentos. Traçamos uma linha temporal com três obras de ficção científica para demonstrar, com mais eficiência a regência de sua arte sobre fatos que permeiam a realidade e o imaginário, a ciência e a literatura. São objetos de estudo as A Guerra dos Mundos de H. G. Wells, 1984 de George Orwell e As Crônicas Marcianas de Ray Bradbury. Além de retratar aqui as funções que se diferenciam dos elementos herdados de outros gêneros literários e suas transmutações, cunhamos a questão de um elemento chave para o homem em seu processo evolutivo, a guerra. Usamos a guerra como maior definidor do progresso científico e tecnológico, os quais são amplamente descritos nestas três obras. E por fim, sobre esses requisitos, o que mais é inerente à ficção científica é sua retroalimentação entre o real e imaginativo, imaginativo e real.

Esta dissertação busca analisar como o romance Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury lida com seu contexto histórico e qual é a resolução simbólica sugerida para o problema por ele apontado. Para tanto, traçaremos paralelos entre o cenário político-social da sociedade fictícia do romance e os Estados Unidos entre 1945 até 1953, data de sua publicação oficial. / The purpose of this research is to analyze how the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, deals with its historical context and which is the symbolic resolution suggested for the issues noted. Therefore, parallels will be drawn between the political-social scene described in its fictional society and that of the United States from 1945 until 1953, the novels official publication date.

Esta dissertação busca analisar como o romance Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury lida com seu contexto histórico e qual é a resolução simbólica sugerida para o problema por ele apontado. Para tanto, traçaremos paralelos entre o cenário político-social da sociedade fictícia do romance e os Estados Unidos entre 1945 até 1953, data de sua publicação oficial. / The purpose of this research is to analyze how the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, deals with its historical context and which is the symbolic resolution suggested for the issues noted. Therefore, parallels will be drawn between the political-social scene described in its fictional society and that of the United States from 1945 until 1953, the novels official publication date.

Academic fiction in its current form—as novels set on university campuses and focused on the lives of faculty—has existed since the mid-twentieth century. The genre explores the purposes and the cultures of universities and the lives of their faculty. Because universities have traditionally been insular communities that interact little with the outside world, the novels contain few non-academic characters. However, one non-academic group does appear consistently throughout the genre—the academic wives. These characters host parties, care for their husbands and children, and remain largely separate from the university structure. Although they appear in nearly all academic fiction, they have escaped notice by critics because they are secondary characters who exist largely in the background. However, a comparison of academic wives and their roles in C. P. Snow's The Masters (published 1951; set 1937), Kingsley Amis's Lucky Jim (published 1954; set in the early 1950s), and Malcolm Bradbury's The History Man (published 1975; set 1972) shows that these characters contribute significantly to the development of universities' cultures. Their roles both influence and respond to changes within the university structure. The academics' anxiety over the wives' potential influence on university affairs in these novels, and these women’s responses to this anxiety, enable the genre to explore the division between academics and non-academics within the university culture.

Este trabalho analisa o Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury e o de François Truffaut, em sua proposição de utilizar a oralidade (discurso oral) como forma de manutenção do literário e resistência à imposição e à censura ideológica. Efetua também uma análise comparatista das Utopias Negativas do século XX (obras Distópicas). Ao longo deste projeto, é feita uma análise do surgimento da escrita (alfabético-fonética), e sua estreita relação com o discurso oral. Tenta-se reproduzir a trajetória traçada pelo discurso oral, passando pelo desenvolvimento da tecnologia escrita, assim como a produção cultural tanto no meio oral quanto no escrito, junto com suas conseqüências e influências sobre pensamento humano. Da oralidade dos poemas homéricos à oralidade advinda com o desenvolvimento de aparelhos eletrônicos como o telefone, que, em plena modernidade, voltam a valorizar o discurso oral. Neste projeto a oralidade é vista como algo cíclico. / This thesis analyses Ray Bradbury’s and François Truffaut’s Fahrenheit 451, in their proposal of using the oral discourse as a way of maintenance of the literacy as well as resistance to ideological imposition and censorship. It also brings a comparative analysis of the Negative Utopias of the twentieth century (Distopic Literature), along with the rise of writing (alphabetic-phonetic writing), and its close relation to oral discourse. It tries to reproduce the path trailed by oral discourse, passing through the development of writing technology, as well as the cultural production both in the oral and in the writing media, along with its consequences and influences to human thought. From Homer’s oral poems to the oral discourse emerged with the development of electronic devices such as the telephone, which enhance oral discourse in modern times. In this project oral discourse is seen as something cyclical.

Informe de Seminario para optar al grado de Licenciado en Lengua y Literatura Inglesa

Este trabalho analisa o Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury e o de François Truffaut, em sua proposição de utilizar a oralidade (discurso oral) como forma de manutenção do literário e resistência à imposição e à censura ideológica. Efetua também uma análise comparatista das Utopias Negativas do século XX (obras Distópicas). Ao longo deste projeto, é feita uma análise do surgimento da escrita (alfabético-fonética), e sua estreita relação com o discurso oral. Tenta-se reproduzir a trajetória traçada pelo discurso oral, passando pelo desenvolvimento da tecnologia escrita, assim como a produção cultural tanto no meio oral quanto no escrito, junto com suas conseqüências e influências sobre pensamento humano. Da oralidade dos poemas homéricos à oralidade advinda com o desenvolvimento de aparelhos eletrônicos como o telefone, que, em plena modernidade, voltam a valorizar o discurso oral. Neste projeto a oralidade é vista como algo cíclico. / This thesis analyses Ray Bradbury’s and François Truffaut’s Fahrenheit 451, in their proposal of using the oral discourse as a way of maintenance of the literacy as well as resistance to ideological imposition and censorship. It also brings a comparative analysis of the Negative Utopias of the twentieth century (Distopic Literature), along with the rise of writing (alphabetic-phonetic writing), and its close relation to oral discourse. It tries to reproduce the path trailed by oral discourse, passing through the development of writing technology, as well as the cultural production both in the oral and in the writing media, along with its consequences and influences to human thought. From Homer’s oral poems to the oral discourse emerged with the development of electronic devices such as the telephone, which enhance oral discourse in modern times. In this project oral discourse is seen as something cyclical.

Este trabalho analisa o Fahrenheit 451 de Ray Bradbury e o de François Truffaut, em sua proposição de utilizar a oralidade (discurso oral) como forma de manutenção do literário e resistência à imposição e à censura ideológica. Efetua também uma análise comparatista das Utopias Negativas do século XX (obras Distópicas). Ao longo deste projeto, é feita uma análise do surgimento da escrita (alfabético-fonética), e sua estreita relação com o discurso oral. Tenta-se reproduzir a trajetória traçada pelo discurso oral, passando pelo desenvolvimento da tecnologia escrita, assim como a produção cultural tanto no meio oral quanto no escrito, junto com suas conseqüências e influências sobre pensamento humano. Da oralidade dos poemas homéricos à oralidade advinda com o desenvolvimento de aparelhos eletrônicos como o telefone, que, em plena modernidade, voltam a valorizar o discurso oral. Neste projeto a oralidade é vista como algo cíclico. / This thesis analyses Ray Bradbury’s and François Truffaut’s Fahrenheit 451, in their proposal of using the oral discourse as a way of maintenance of the literacy as well as resistance to ideological imposition and censorship. It also brings a comparative analysis of the Negative Utopias of the twentieth century (Distopic Literature), along with the rise of writing (alphabetic-phonetic writing), and its close relation to oral discourse. It tries to reproduce the path trailed by oral discourse, passing through the development of writing technology, as well as the cultural production both in the oral and in the writing media, along with its consequences and influences to human thought. From Homer’s oral poems to the oral discourse emerged with the development of electronic devices such as the telephone, which enhance oral discourse in modern times. In this project oral discourse is seen as something cyclical.