Spelling suggestions: "subject:"covenant"" "subject:"intervenants""
131 |
Project finance no Brasil: um estudo de caso dos processos e mecanismos que tornaram viável o financiamento de dois portos privados em um banco brasileiroCosta, Rickie Viana 02 December 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Rickie Viana Costa (rickieviana@gmail.com) on 2016-12-28T19:02:12Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Rickie Costa_v. Final FGV (1).pdf: 2153965 bytes, checksum: 22fb7ed5dbf1929ddec7d091c3dedebe (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Janete de Oliveira Feitosa (janete.feitosa@fgv.br) on 2017-01-02T12:05:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Rickie Costa_v. Final FGV (1).pdf: 2153965 bytes, checksum: 22fb7ed5dbf1929ddec7d091c3dedebe (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-03T16:53:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Rickie Costa_v. Final FGV (1).pdf: 2153965 bytes, checksum: 22fb7ed5dbf1929ddec7d091c3dedebe (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-02 / Existe no Brasil uma dificuldade para se conseguir financiamento para um projeto de infraestrutura junto a bancos comerciais. Essa dificuldade está relacionada a fatores micro, como o desconhecimento de investidores sobre os processos de análise de projeto e risco em um banco brasileiro, até a fatores macro, relacionados à conjuntura econômica brasileira e setorial de infraestrutura. Cada banco possui um modelo de análise de crédito e risco particular para decidir se concede ou não um financiamento. Dado o grande volume de recursos que é necessário para se fazer uma obra de infraestrutura, sem o financiamento bancário, além de incentivos do governo, investidores não enxergam viabilidade e retorno suficientes para fazer esse investimento. Como forma de diminuir e diluir o risco entre bancos, investidores e outras contrapartes envolvidas em um projeto de infraestrutura, tende-se a adotar mundialmente a estrutura do Project Finance, que se tornou chave também no Brasil para se obter sucesso de financiamento junto ao BNDES e a bancos comerciais. O papel do BNDES é fundamental na estrutura de financiamento no Brasil, uma vez que este concede empréstimos a juros subsidiados, reduzindo o custo de capital médio ponderado (WACC) dos projetos, fator decisivo para torná-los atrativos à investidores. O Project Finance é importante não só por diluir os riscos entre as partes, mas principalmente por esta estrutura permitir aos bancos preverem e anteciparem diversos riscos que podem ocorrer naquele projeto. Esse maior conhecimento os permite criar mecanismos contratuais específicos para aquele financiamento e os protege desses riscos prováveis. Covenants, obrigações e garantias podem, então, se tornar um dos principais pontos de discussão entre os Sponsors e Lenders processo de estruturação de um financiamento, ponto este que será estudado neste trabalho por meio de dois estudos de caso reais de financiamento a portos marítimos em um banco brasileiro.
|
132 |
Covenant (berith) in Daniel and the Dead Sea Scrolls : an exposition of Daniel 9-12 and selected sections of the Damascus Document (CD), Community Rule (1QS), Hymns Scroll (1QHA) and War Scroll (1QM)Linington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
The following thesis comprises a systematic, synchronic study of the term בְּרִית (berîṯ,
covenant) in the book of Daniel, the Damascus Document, the Community Rule (Serekhha-
Yaḥad), the Hymn Scroll (Hodayot) and the War Scroll (Milḥamah). The basic text
used for Daniel is the BHS, and for the Dead Sea Scrolls the Dead Sea Scrolls Electronic
Library, supplemented by other editions.
Apart from an introduction (chapter 1), the work is divided into two sections. The
second chapter begins with a discussion of some introductory matters, such as the dating
and purpose of the book of Daniel. The remainder of the chapter comprises two
subsections, consisting firstly of an exegesis of Daniel 9 and secondly an exposition of
Daniel 10-12 with particular reference to covenant terminology. The prayer in Daniel 9 is
given much space since it is replete with covenant language, though the word בְּרִית only
occurs at Daniel 9:4. The main focus of the second subsection is the vision report in Daniel
11, with particular emphasis on Daniel 11:20-45 where the word בְּרִית occurs.
The third chapter contains four subsections, each giving an exegesis of those
parts of the Damascus Document, Community Rule, Hymn Scroll and War Scroll where
the term בְּרִית occurs. Each subsection is preceded by a brief introduction to the scroll
concerned, looking at such issues as the provenance and dating of the scroll without going
into too much detail, and followed by a conclusion, summarising the findings in each
section. While such issues as the nature of the community represented by each scroll are
mentioned where appropriate, they do not form a major emphasis in this study.
Throughout, particular prominence is given to specific terminology used in order
to determine the authors’ theological emphases. A few terms that are related to ,בְּרִית
‘covenant’, such as חֶסֶד (ḥeseḏ ‘mercy, lovingkindness’), אָהָב (’āhāḇ; [covenant] love), אָלָה
(’ālāh; ‘curse, oath’), are also included in this study at the relevant places.
The conclusion (chapter 4) draws together the findings of all sections and seeks
to compare the terminology used in Daniel with that of the Dead Sea Scrolls. / Old Testament & Ancient Near Eastern Studies / D. Th. (Old Testament)
|
133 |
Covenant (berith) in Daniel and the Dead Sea Scrolls : an exposition of Daniel 9-12 and selected sections of the Damascus Document (CD), Community Rule (1QS), Hymns Scroll (1QHA) and War Scroll (1QM)Linington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
The following thesis comprises a systematic, synchronic study of the term בְּרִית (berîṯ,
covenant) in the book of Daniel, the Damascus Document, the Community Rule (Serekhha-
Yaḥad), the Hymn Scroll (Hodayot) and the War Scroll (Milḥamah). The basic text
used for Daniel is the BHS, and for the Dead Sea Scrolls the Dead Sea Scrolls Electronic
Library, supplemented by other editions.
Apart from an introduction (chapter 1), the work is divided into two sections. The
second chapter begins with a discussion of some introductory matters, such as the dating
and purpose of the book of Daniel. The remainder of the chapter comprises two
subsections, consisting firstly of an exegesis of Daniel 9 and secondly an exposition of
Daniel 10-12 with particular reference to covenant terminology. The prayer in Daniel 9 is
given much space since it is replete with covenant language, though the word בְּרִית only
occurs at Daniel 9:4. The main focus of the second subsection is the vision report in Daniel
11, with particular emphasis on Daniel 11:20-45 where the word בְּרִית occurs.
The third chapter contains four subsections, each giving an exegesis of those
parts of the Damascus Document, Community Rule, Hymn Scroll and War Scroll where
the term בְּרִית occurs. Each subsection is preceded by a brief introduction to the scroll
concerned, looking at such issues as the provenance and dating of the scroll without going
into too much detail, and followed by a conclusion, summarising the findings in each
section. While such issues as the nature of the community represented by each scroll are
mentioned where appropriate, they do not form a major emphasis in this study.
Throughout, particular prominence is given to specific terminology used in order
to determine the authors’ theological emphases. A few terms that are related to ,בְּרִית
‘covenant’, such as חֶסֶד (ḥeseḏ ‘mercy, lovingkindness’), אָהָב (’āhāḇ; [covenant] love), אָלָה
(’ālāh; ‘curse, oath’), are also included in this study at the relevant places.
The conclusion (chapter 4) draws together the findings of all sections and seeks
to compare the terminology used in Daniel with that of the Dead Sea Scrolls. / Biblical and Ancient Studies / D. Th. (Old Testament)
|
134 |
La mise en oeuvre de l'accord d'association en Algérie - Union européenne dans les perspectives du respect des droits de l'homme. / The implementation of the Algerian-European association agreement in the perspective of the respect of human rights.Lattouf, Ziad 07 January 2011 (has links)
L’accord d’association Algérie-Union Européenne, paraphé à Bruxelles le 19 décembre 2001 et entré en vigueur le 1er septembre 2005, fonde un partenariat en matière des droits de l’homme. Déclenché par la Déclaration de Barcelone du 27 et 28 novembre 1995, il fournit aujourd’hui le modèle le plus complet pour une meilleure mise en œuvre réelle et effective des droits de l’homme dans le cadre des accords d’associations. Inspiré, d’une politique euro-méditerranéenne qui a pour objectif la promotion et la protection des droits de l’homme, tel qu’énoncée dans la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme, inspire les politiques internes et internationales des parties et constitue un élément essentiel pour la mise en œuvre de l’accord d’association Algérie-UE. Y’a-t-il une réelle mise en œuvre de l’accord d’association Algérie-Union Européenne dans les perspectives du respect des droits de l’homme ? Et quels sont les moyens mis en place? / The Algerian-European association, signed on 19 December 2001 in Brussels and enforced on 1 September 2005, represents a partnership in terms of human rights. Sett off by the Barcelona Declaration of 27 & 28 November 1995, it nowadays serves as the best model for a genuine implementation of human rights in the field of assocation agreements. Inspired by Euro-Mediterranean policy whose objective is the promotion as well as protection of human rights, as stated in the universal declaration of human rights, it affects the parties, domestic and international policies and represents and essential element in the implementation of the Algerian-European association agreement. Is there a genuine implementation of the Algerian-European association agreement in the perspective of the respect of human rights? And what are the means used for that propose?
|
Page generated in 0.2194 seconds