Den här undersökningen fokuserar på elevernas åsikter om ämnesövergripande undervisning, samt hur de upplever sitt eget lärande jämfört med ämnesspecifik undervisning. Elevernas attityd undersöktes i tre olika ämnesövergripande projekt på en gymnasieskola. Eleverna fyllde i en enkät innan projektstarten, en efter halva projekttiden, samt en sista när de respektive projekten hade avslutats. Elevernas syn på sitt eget lärande kompletterades med åsikterna av både gymnasie- och högstadielärare som fyllde i en enkät om för- och nackdelar, samt uppskattningen av elevernas lärande i ämnesövergripande jämfört med ämnesspecifika projekt. Eleverna i studien hyste varken positiva eller negativa känslor före projekten. Känslorna ändrades inte signifikant under projektets gång. En intressant trend är att en del av eleverna, som någorlunda förstod de inblandande ämnenas samband efter halva projekttiden, antingen inte längre såg det, eller uppfattade sambandet mer tydligt än förut. Jämförelsevis var lärarna i undersökningen mer positiv gentemot ämnesövergripande arbete än eleverna. Men även en stor del av eleverna upplevde att de hade lärt sig mer i de ämnesövergripande projekten jämfört med andra skolarbeten. Resultaten diskuteras i jämförelse med varandra och med andra undersökningar om ämnesövergripande arbete, som fokuserar mest på lärarnas åsikter, samt med hänsyn till styrdokumentens krav på ämnesövergripande undervisning i grund- och gymnasieskolan.

Tim Randberg and Filip Lindahl carried out this study under the institution for pedagogy, didactics and educational studies at Uppsala University. In relation to the lack of research regarding students’ perspectives regarding the legitimizing aspects of the school subject of social science(samhällskunskap), and in contrast to the existence of such research regarding teachers’ perspectives, this study is an attempt at contributing to the lack of previous research and note the importance of working towards a reality in which students’ and teachers’ attitudes, regarding the importance and the purpose of social studies, aligns.  This didactic study, which analyzes which attitudes are connected to a small group of students (age 18), as well as a small group of social science teachers, regarding what legitimizes studying social science, along with the key differences between these two groups, is an interview study in which a didactic theory formed by Gert Biesta was applied in relation to the results of the interview. Biesta’s theoretical framework, which is central for this study, categorized the legitimizing aspects of education into three categories: qualification, socialization and subjectification, in which every relevant analytical finding was categorized into each of Biesta’s three categories. This study concludes that both teachers and students found the internalization of democratic values as well as citizenship development to be the central legitimizing aspects of civic studies. The results regarding the teachers’ comments aligned with most previous research, except for the aspect of power, which in contrast to previous research was absent in the results for this study. Regarding the three theoretical categories, no significant differences were to be found but rather smaller differences that could be considered noteworthy. Teachers discussed the legitimizing aspects of civic studies from a qualification-related point of view more than the students did. In contrast, the students made comments that were connected to the concepts of socialization as well as subjectification in a greater sense compared to the teachers. Regarding the concept of qualification, both teachers and students related the purpose of civic studies to skills and knowledge necessary to engage politically in society, or to prosper in society. Connected to the concept of socialization, students found that it was important that people internalized democratic values and norms related to democracy, which aligns with the teachers’ responses, only that the latter as a group further discussed the legitimizing aspect of civic studies as it being a means to prevent extremism, racism as well as other anti-democratic aspects that a few students were described as gravitating towards. In relation to the concept of subjectification, students, unlike the teachers, noted the importance of becoming global citizens. Both groups argued for the importance of developing a culturally adaptive mindset as well as forming an individual political opinion. Most teachers discussed the importance of students, along with the civic studies, becoming less self-centered and more focused on their role in relation to a social, collective context. In contrast, several students made individualistic claims; that a legitimizing aspect of civic studies, regarding certain skills and abilities that comes with the subject and that was regarded as a key element in a modern, democratic social context, is that they develop a sense of what others think of them and how successfully they present themselves to other people, groups and institutions. One conclusion is that there is a reason for the didactic research-field to investigate whether there needs to be a function in Swedish education which investigates whether students and teachers share the same idea of why they are studying a subject or various content related to a subject,