我國繼受羅馬－日耳曼法系傳統，法學教育的內涵是博雅教育。英國與美國在普通法學徒制的傳統下，法學教育的目標是訓練合格律師的職業教育。此即Max Weber區分的理性的法學教育與經驗性的法學教育模式。本文將以法律文化研究中法律多元主義的觀點，觀察並描述整體法律運作的實際狀況，包含法律歷來的演進過程，以及支配法律運作的原理原則。並將法律體系與社會的其他部門，同樣置諸文化脈絡之內，探究法學教育模式之間的相互影響。 法律文化傳統影響法學教育目標，而教育目標的確定又帶動教學方法的演進。近年來美國的學士後法律學位模式，亦即一般為期三年的J.D，被東亞的日本、南韓與中國紛紛借鏡，我國也有全面引進之議。但在確定法學院的教育目標和教學品質之後，即不應以任何形式控制法律從業人員的數量，而應依循資格考的原則，讓接受過充分法學訓練者皆能進入法律的實踐階段。

Submitted by William Justo Figueiro (williamjf) on 2015-06-16T18:34:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 20.pdf: 3194820 bytes, checksum: 634124ee21a63f423f96bbc90949aa20 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-16T18:34:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 20.pdf: 3194820 bytes, checksum: 634124ee21a63f423f96bbc90949aa20 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-19 / UNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos / Estudar a educação jurídica no século XXI implica em construir novas respostas aos problemas que se apresentam. O modo tradicionalmente adotado para se pensar o Direito e seu ensino não é mais suficiente diante de um mundo que vive em constantes transformações. As demandas deste tempo exigem um profissional apto a pensar de modo transdisciplinar, capaz de enfrentar um contexto repleto de complexidades, riscos, paradoxos e contingências. Os ideais de certeza e segurança jurídica não mais se fazem presentes nos dias de hoje, exigindo do profissional do Direito a capacidade de reconectar os saberes. Nesse sentido, destaca-se a relevância dos conteúdos denominados propedêuticos no processo de formação do bacharel, pois têm o papel de promover uma visão integrada, crítica e reflexiva acerca dos fenômenos jurídicos e sociais. Apesar de sua importância, constata-se que os conteúdos propedêuticos são pouco valorizados por parte do corpo discente, que tende a resumir a formação jurídica à prática profissional. A partir dessa problemática, o presente trabalho apresentará a inclusão desses saberes nos currículos dos cursos jurídicos brasileiros desde a sua criação, em 1827. Em seguida, buscar-se-á identificar o perfil dos alunos em início e final de curso e qual a sua avaliação sobre os conteúdos propedêuticos. Após essa etapa, o trabalho se propõe a identificar o perfil dos professores que atuam nessas áreas e constatar quais as suas percepções sobre os desafios da educação jurídica. O contato com os docentes e discentes ocorreu por meio de pesquisa de campo realizada no Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis e na Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Por fim, abordar-se-á o paradigma de ensino tradicionalmente adotado pelos cursos jurídicos e, em seguida, serão apresentadas algumas alternativas para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem dos conteúdos propedêuticos. / To study the law education in 21st century requires building new answers to the problems. The traditional adopted way to think the law and its teaching are not enough considering a world which lives in constant transformation. The demands of present time require a professional both able to think in an transdisciplinary way and able to face a context full of complexity, risks, paradoxes and contingencies. The ideal of certainty and legal security are no longer present today, requiring of the law professional the ability to reconnect knowledge. In this sense it is highlighted the relevance of contents called propaedeutic in the process of bachelor formation considering these bachelors have the role to promote an integrated, critic and reflexive vision about the legal and social phenomena. Despite of its importance, it is noticed that propaedeutic disciplines have little appreciation by students which tend to summarize the law education to the professional practice. From this proposition this paper will present the inclusion of these disciplines in the curricula of Brazilian law schools since its inception in 1827. Then it will search the profile of the students in the beginning and end of the course and what are their assessment of the propaedeutic disciplines. After, the study aims to identify the profile of the teachers who work in these disciplines and find what are their perception on the challenges of law education in this area. The contact with the faculty and students occurred through field research conducted in the Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis and in the Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Finally it will approach the traditional teaching paradigm adopted by law schools and then will present some alternatives for teaching and learning process of propaedeutic contents.

Thesis (LL. M.)--York University, 2002. Graduate Programme in Law. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 336-361). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/yorku/fullcit?pMQ75408.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2010. / Title from screen (viewed on May 3, 2010). School of Social Work, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Advisor(s): Margaret E. Adamek, Valerie N. Chang, Nancy Chism, Rebecca S. Sloan, Lorraine Blackman, Matthew C. Aalsma. Includes vitae. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 216-241).

Orientador: José Camilo dos Santos Filho / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-24T04:15:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Caldas_TaniaAlencarde_D.pdf: 2880461 bytes, checksum: 9c52070e88b40b9f4b4739e3175bd030 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 / Resumo: Este trabalho teve por objetivo comparar as visões curriculares dos egressos dos cursos de Direito de instituições públicas com as visões dos egressos dos cursos de Direito de instituições privadas, aprovados no Exame da Ordem no período de 2000 a 2010. Esta pesquisa pode ser caracterizada como uma pesquisa "survey" de um curso determinado - o de Direito. Assim, seus resultados refletem o atual tempo histórico e revelam a percepção dos egressos a respeito de sua formação e da preparação de futuros profissionais do Direito, em resposta às novas demandas de nossa sociedade. Por meio de questionário online, com questões fechadas e abertas, esta pesquisa buscou levantar a visão de egressos do curso de Direito sobre as três ênfases curriculares da formação - formação geral, formação básica e formação profissionalizante, tanto em relação à formação recebida como em relação à formação desejável. Buscou-se respostas a dois questionamentos básicos: 1- Quanto às questões curriculares, a universidade tem propiciado sólida formação geral, humanística e profissional e o desenvolvimento de competências e habilidades indispensáveis ao exercício da Ciência do Direito, da prestação da justiça e do desenvolvimento da cidadania?; 2- Quanto à política educacional brasileira sobre formação jurídica, o curso de graduação em Direito possibilita/ou uma formação profissional que revele as habilidades e competências previstas pelo Conselho Nacional da Educação (CNE)? Para a análise dos resultados, duas abordagens metodológicas foram utilizadas: a quantitativa e a qualitativa. Quando comparados os dois grupos de formados em relação à formação recebida (características positivas/negativas) e a desejada (escala de Likert), os testes estatísticos (significância inferior a 0,05) revelaram os seguintes resultados: (1) Em relação às características positivas, os formados em instituições privadas receberam formação que favoreceu a relação teoria-prática, preparou para o Exame de Ordem, com disciplinas bem distribuídas e estágio supervisionado, enquanto que os de instituições públicas receberam formação humanística, com ênfase na teoria e interpretação dos fenômenos jurídicos, e que proporcionada compreensão das questões sociais além do raciocínio jurídico e desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico; (2) Em relação às características negativas, os egressos de instituições privadas mostraram-se descontentes apenas com a inadequada preparação para o Exame da Ordem e falta de incentivo a estágio, enquanto que os de instituições públicas asseveraram que o currículo era desatualizado, a carga horária excessiva apresentava conteúdos repetidos, não havia integração com outras áreas do conhecimento e os professores apresentavam metodologia deficiente. 3) Quanto à formação básica/fundamental, os egressos de instituições privadas apontaram que o currículo deveria: trabalhar o conteúdo teórico relacionado com a prática; desenvolver a capacidade de comunicação oral e escrita; já os de instituições públicas destacaram o desenvolvimento da criticidade do aluno; (4) Quanto à formação geral, os egressos de instituições privadas assinalaram a prioridade da dimensão ética na formação profissional; enquanto os de instituições públicas valorizaram o desenvolvimento de um saber integrando conhecimento de diferentes áreas; (5) Quanto à formação profissional, enquanto os egressos de instituições privadas assinalaram a importância da aquisição / Abstract: The purpose of this research study was to compare the curricular view of law school alumni of public institutions with the view of law school alumni of private institutions approved in the "Order Exam" in the period from 2000 to 2010. This study can be characterized as a survey research of a specific course - that of Law. Thus, its results reflect the present historical time and reveal the perception of alumni regarding their formation and preparation as future professional of Law, in response to the new demands of our society. Through an online questionnaire, with closed and open questions, this study tried to survey the view of these alumni regarding the three curricular dimensions of their formation - general education, basic education, and profession formation, related to the received formation, as well as to the desired formation. The study focused two basic questions: 1. Regarding the curricular problems, has the university provided solid general, humanistic and professional formation and the development of the competencies and skills required for the performance of Law Science, justice service and citizenship development?; 2. Regarding the Brazilian educational policy for juridical formation, has the undergraduate law course provided a professional formation which reveals the competencies and skills established by the National Education Council (NEC)? For the analysis of the results, two methodological approaches were utilized: the quantitative and the qualitative. When the two groups of alumni were compared in relation to the received and the desired formation, the statistical tests (significance inferior to 0,05), revealed the following main results: (1) In relationship to the positive characteristics of the course, the alumni of private institutions received a formation which favored theory-practice relation, prepared them for the Order Exam, with disciplines well distributed and supervised practicum. On the other hand, the alumni of public institutions received humanistic formation, with emphasis on theory and interpretation of juridical phenomena, and which provided the understanding of social questions, the juridical reasoning and the development of critical thinking; (2) In relation to the negative characteristics of the course, the alumni of private institutions demonstrated discontentment only with the inadequate preparation for the Order Exam and the lack of incentive for the practicum. On the other hand, the alumni of public institutions stated that the curriculum was outdated, the excessive hour credit presented repetitive contents, there was no integration with the other areas of knowledge, and the professors utilized inadequate didactics; (3) Regarding the basic formation, the alumni of private institutions indicated that the curriculum should: articulate the theoretical content with practice; develop the skill of oral and written communication, while the alumni of public institutions emphasized the development of critical thinking; (4) Regarding the general education, the alumni of private institutions signaled the priority of the ethical dimension in the professional formation, while the alumni of public institutions gave value to the development of a knowledge which integrate knowledge of different areas; (5) Regarding the professional formation, while the alumni of private institutions signaled the importance of acquisition of specific knowledge, those of public institutions disagreed with proposition / Doutorado / Ensino e Práticas Culturais / Doutora em Educação

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Bully victimization takes place within a social context of youths’ parents, peers, teachers, school administrators, and community. Victims often rely on parents, educators, or peers for support. However, there is a gap in the literature in understanding parents’ experiences of what occurs before, during, and after reporting bullying to school officials. Therefore, this dissertation study examined parents’ experiences in discovering, reporting, and living through the aftermath of their child being bullied. This study used a purposeful sample that was criterion-based. Nine mothers and one mother/father pair were tape-recorded using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Follow-up phone interviews followed. Key themes and patterns were analyzed using the philosophical method of interpretive phenomenology based on Heidegger’s philosophy of being. Exemplars were used to illuminate several themes. Results suggest three unique stages. In the first stage, discovery, parents often noticed psychosocial changes in their child related to bullying. Parents often responded initially by providing advice to their children. When signs of their schoolchildren being bullied persisted, parents decided to report the incidents to school officials. Nine parents reported incomplete interventions that let their youths’ victimization continue. One parent, a paradigm case, shared understandings of how her son’s school official provided a full intervention that was restorative. However, all other parents who received an incomplete intervention found themselves rethinking how to protect their children from bullying. In this aftermath, several parents moved their children out of the school into a new district or began to home school. However, half the parents were left unable to move their child and therefore could not provide protection. Indiana’s anti-bullying law was unknown to eight parents and was unsuccessful in leveraging protection for one parent who used it with school officials as a threat. School official’s responses to bullying were incongruent with student handbook procedures. Recommendations from a parent’s perspective indicate school officials must: 1) have a clear process in place for parents to report, 2) follow through by calling parents back with results from investigating and procedures that will be taken to intervene, and 3) call the bullies’ and victims’ parents to notify what has occurred and what will be done to ensure safety. Discussed are implications for school officials, including social workers, and state policymakers. There is a proposed intervention model (Appendix J) that addresses how parents can respond to school officials who are hesitant to provide bullied youth protection.

This item contains the agenda, minutes, and attachments for the Faculty Senate meeting on this date. There may be additional materials from the meeting available at the Faculty Center.