O trabalho foi desenvolvido para analisar a aplicabilidade do princípio da insignificância aos crimes que tutelam bens jurídicos difusos. O conceito de bem jurídico é o único elemento prévio à legislação com capacidade de limitar materialmente o poder punitivo estatal, sendo inaceitável o seu abandono, relativização ou flexibilização. O bem jurídico difuso é tutelado tendo em vista a proteção e o pleno desenvolvimento do ser humano, e suas características favorecem a tipificação de crimes de perigo abstrato e de crimes cumulativos, sendo inaceitáveis crimes de mera desobediência. O princípio da insignificância é uma ferramenta interpretativa do tipo penal e deve ser dividido em insignificância absoluta, hipótese em que a conduta sequer afeta o bem jurídico abstratamente considerado, apresentando uma ofensividade reduzidíssima e carecendo de tipicidade material; e insignificância relativa, hipótese em que se exclui a culpabilidade do agente no caso de ser diminuta a lesão ao bem jurídico individualizado e reduzidíssima a reprovabilidade do agente, devendo o fato ser considerado axiologicamente irrelevante, não havendo necessidade ou merecimento de pena. As lesões ao bem jurídico difuso atingem apenas indiretamente o indivíduo, ainda que socialmente tomado, e quando o reflexo da lesão ao bem jurídico difuso atingir o indivíduo (de hoje ou do futuro) de forma reduzida, deve ser ela considerada insignificante, sendo a insignificância relativa o instrumento mais compatível com a análise das condutas que se subsumem a crimes de perigo abstrato e a crimes cumulativos. / This work was developed to analyze the applicability of the insignificance principle to the crimes that protect the diffuse juridical chattels. The juridical chattel is the only element previews to the legislation capable of limiting the punishing power of the State, and it is unacceptable to abandon it, to relativize it or to loosen it. The diffuse juridical chattel is protected to preserve the human being and its full development, and its characteristics facilitate the creation of abstract danger crimes and cumulating crimes, but it is unacceptable crimes of mere disobedience. The insignificance principle is a interpretative tool for the criminal type and must be divided into absolute insignificance, which occurs when the action do not affect the juridical chattel abstractly considered, having a very reduced offensiveness, lacking of material typicality, and relative insignificance, which excludes the culpability when it entail a small damage to the juridical chattel individually taken, what makes this action axiologically irrelevant, and the punishment unnecessary and undeserved. The damages to the juridical chattel strike only indirectly the individual, even when socially taken, and when the reflex of the damage to the juridical chattel strikes the individual (of the present or of the future) in a reduced way, it must be considered insignificant, and the relative insignificance is the most compatible tool to analyze the insignificance of the action that may be considered an abstract danger crime or a cumulating crime.

The diploma thesis named "Subsidiarity Principle within the Theory of Social Politics" deals with the analysis of subsidiarity principle within social politics, its theoretical anchorage within both, social politics and the European Union, with practical application in the context of social work in connection to the ethical conception of this principle, and criticism that is being applied onto this principle. First, theoretical foundations of social work are outlined, followed by definition of subsidiarity principle, subsidiarity genesis, its role within European Union. Ethical foundations, specific application of subsidiarity, and last but not least, criticism of this principle, follow. The diploma thesis is theoretical.

1 The role of media in criminal proceeding Abstract The thesis deals, as the name implies, with the role of the media in criminal proceedings, both theoretically and practically. The work contains a lot of examples primarily through the case-law presented. Chapter one is titled "Power of Media". It deals with the emergence of this concept and the history of the media in our country. It also focuses on the potential threat to media power, through purchasing of mass media, and murder of journalists and media workers. The second chapter deals first with one of the basic principles of criminal proceedings, namely the principle of the public; the second part deals with the principle of the presumption of innocence. The third chapter briefly focuses on the media's access to proceedings. The conclusion of the chapter is devoted to the controversy over online reports from the courtroom and their possible regulation by judges. The fourth chapter deals with providing information on criminal proceedings. Apart from legislation, it also offers a view of the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court, the Constitutional Court and the principles of the European Court of Human Rights. The fifth chapter deals with the editorial secret, with particular emphasis on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The...

The aim of this project is to argue that practical reason governs our normative responsibilities in one voice. There are no genuine conflicts within law, none within morality, and none between law and morality. On the contrary, there are single right answers to questions about what law and morality, considered separately or together, demand. I try to show that this claim, which I refer to as the "Unity Thesis", is both ordinary and deeply valuable. It concerns the correct way to understand, judge, and reason about the normative principles our political, legal, and moral practices establish. The Unity Thesis holds that we ought to, and that we already tacitly do, regard these principles as constituting an integrated, mutually supportive practical system--a unity of principle.

No description available.

分形分析的主題是研究分形上的Dirichlet形式和Laplacian. 壓縮的自相似群有一個與之關聯的極限空間,此空間通常具備分形結構，因而引發了分形分析和自相似群兩個分支的結合. / 我們回顧了自相似群和它們的極限空間極限空間可以用Schreier 圖來逼近,事實上其可以看成由Schreier圖構造出來的雙曲圖的雙曲邊界.我們探究了迭代單值群. 通過增加專門的條件我們可以得到迭代單值群的極限空間同胚於某個Julia集. / 通過運用[31] 中的想法和[47] 中自相似隨機游動的方法，我們闡明了極限空間上Laplacian和Dirichlet形式的構造步驟我們介紹了加法器， Basilica群以及Hanoi塔群的極限空間(在第三種情況下是Sierpiríski墊片)上的Laplacian 這裡得到的Dirichlet形式是局部且正則的. / 通過採用[53] 的設置, 我們描述了加法器的極限空間上的誘發型Dirichlet形式在構造了加法器的自相似圖上的嚴格可逆隨機游動後，我們可以得到一個非局部的Dirichlet形式. / The major theme of fractal analysis is studying Dirichlet forms and Laplacians on fractals. For a contracting self-similar group there is an associated limit space, which usually exhibits a fractal structure, thereby triggering the combination of fractal analysis and self-similar groups. / We give reviews of self-similar groups and their limit spaces. Limit space can be approximated by Schreier graphs, and it is in fact identied as a hyperbolic boundary of a hyperbolic graph constructed from Schreier graphs. We explore the iterated monodromy groups. By adding technical conditions, we have that the limit space of an iterated monodromy group is homeomorphic to a Julia set. / We show the construction process of Laplacians and Dirichlet forms on limit spaces using the idea of [31] and the method of self-similar random walks from [47]. We present examples of Laplacians of the limit spaces of adding machine, the Basilica group and the Hanoi Tower group (it is Sierpi´nski gasket in this case). In this context these forms are local and regular. / We describe the induced Dirichlet forms on limit space of the adding machine by adopting the settings of [53] . By constructing strictly reversible random walks on self-similarity graph of the adding machine, we can obtain a non-local Dirichlet form. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Lin, Dateng. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 71-76). / Abstracts also in Chinese. / Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.6 / Chapter 1.1 --- Review of fractal analysis --- p.6 / Chapter 1.2 --- Applications to self-similar groups --- p.7 / Chapter 1.3 --- Boundary theory method --- p.8 / Chapter 1.4 --- Summary of the thesis --- p.9 / Chapter 2 --- Self-similar groups --- p.11 / Chapter 2.1 --- Basic definitions --- p.11 / Chapter 2.2 --- Limit spaces of self-similar groups --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3 --- Schreier graphs approximations --- p.24 / Chapter 2.4 --- Iterated monodromy groups --- p.28 / Chapter 3 --- Construction of Laplacians on limit spaces --- p.35 / Chapter 3.1 --- Dirichlet forms, Laplacians and resistance forms --- p.35 / Chapter 3.2 --- Representations of groups and functions --- p.42 / Chapter 3.3 --- Laplacians on limit spaces --- p.45 / Chapter 4 --- Induced Dirichlet form on limit space of the adding machine --- p.53 / Chapter 4.1 --- Martin boundary and hyperbolic boundary --- p.53 / Chapter 4.2 --- Graph energy and the induced form --- p.62 / Chapter 4.3 --- Induced Dirichlet form of the adding machine --- p.65 / Bibliography --- p.71

O trabalho foi desenvolvido para analisar a aplicabilidade do princípio da insignificância aos crimes que tutelam bens jurídicos difusos. O conceito de bem jurídico é o único elemento prévio à legislação com capacidade de limitar materialmente o poder punitivo estatal, sendo inaceitável o seu abandono, relativização ou flexibilização. O bem jurídico difuso é tutelado tendo em vista a proteção e o pleno desenvolvimento do ser humano, e suas características favorecem a tipificação de crimes de perigo abstrato e de crimes cumulativos, sendo inaceitáveis crimes de mera desobediência. O princípio da insignificância é uma ferramenta interpretativa do tipo penal e deve ser dividido em insignificância absoluta, hipótese em que a conduta sequer afeta o bem jurídico abstratamente considerado, apresentando uma ofensividade reduzidíssima e carecendo de tipicidade material; e insignificância relativa, hipótese em que se exclui a culpabilidade do agente no caso de ser diminuta a lesão ao bem jurídico individualizado e reduzidíssima a reprovabilidade do agente, devendo o fato ser considerado axiologicamente irrelevante, não havendo necessidade ou merecimento de pena. As lesões ao bem jurídico difuso atingem apenas indiretamente o indivíduo, ainda que socialmente tomado, e quando o reflexo da lesão ao bem jurídico difuso atingir o indivíduo (de hoje ou do futuro) de forma reduzida, deve ser ela considerada insignificante, sendo a insignificância relativa o instrumento mais compatível com a análise das condutas que se subsumem a crimes de perigo abstrato e a crimes cumulativos. / This work was developed to analyze the applicability of the insignificance principle to the crimes that protect the diffuse juridical chattels. The juridical chattel is the only element previews to the legislation capable of limiting the punishing power of the State, and it is unacceptable to abandon it, to relativize it or to loosen it. The diffuse juridical chattel is protected to preserve the human being and its full development, and its characteristics facilitate the creation of abstract danger crimes and cumulating crimes, but it is unacceptable crimes of mere disobedience. The insignificance principle is a interpretative tool for the criminal type and must be divided into absolute insignificance, which occurs when the action do not affect the juridical chattel abstractly considered, having a very reduced offensiveness, lacking of material typicality, and relative insignificance, which excludes the culpability when it entail a small damage to the juridical chattel individually taken, what makes this action axiologically irrelevant, and the punishment unnecessary and undeserved. The damages to the juridical chattel strike only indirectly the individual, even when socially taken, and when the reflex of the damage to the juridical chattel strikes the individual (of the present or of the future) in a reduced way, it must be considered insignificant, and the relative insignificance is the most compatible tool to analyze the insignificance of the action that may be considered an abstract danger crime or a cumulating crime.

Esta pesquisa aborda algumas contribuições de Paul Otlet para a Ciência da Informação, tais como o desenvolvimento de um sistema de classificação conhecido como Classificação Decimal Universal, a ampla utilização de tecnologias emergentes, a constituição de redes cooperativas e a elaboração do conceito de documento. Estuda mais especificamente o Princípio Monográfico, que pode ser visto como um antecessor do hipertexto. Para tanto, reconstitui o pensamento de Paul Otlet identificando os recursos teóricos e metodológicos que utilizou para a elaboração do Princípio Monográfico. Focaliza também a interlocução mantida por ele com alguns dos representantes do Movimento Bibliográfico, surgido na Europa no final do século XIX e início do século XX, que colaboraram para o desenvolvimento do conceito do Princípio Monográfico. Considera-se que a importância de Paul Otlet esteja fundamentalmente ligada ao seu projeto de modernização dos processos de tratamento da informação. / This essay approaches some of Paul Otlet\'s contributions to the field of Information Science, such as the development of a classification system known as Universal Decimal Classification, wide utilization of emerging technologies, the establishment of cooperative networks and the elaboration on the concept of document. More specifically, it studies the Monographic Principle, which can be seen as the predecessor to hypertext. For such, it tries to recompose Paul Otlet\'s thought, identifying the theoretical and methodological resources used by him in the construction of the Monographic Principle. It also focuses the exchanges he had with some of the Bibliographic Movement\'s (originated in Europe between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th) representatives, which in turn collaborated on the development of the Monographic Principle concept. It is considered that Paul Otlet\'s importance is fundamentally related to his project for the modernization of the processes for the treatment of information.

As ideias políticas e filosóficas que influenciaram a criação da regra da legalidade penal e do princípio da ofensividade têm origem no Iluminismo. Principalmente durante a Idade Média e o Antigo Regime, confundia-se crime com pecado e as pessoas podiam ser punidas por mero capricho do soberano, sem que existisse lei. As arbitrariedades eram gritantes. A finalidade de ambas as teorias surgidas no período da Ilustração, portanto ao pregarem que era necessária a existência de lei prévia para que alguém fosse punido (regra da legalidade) e que o crime pressupunha uma lesão a direito ou bem jurídico de terceiro (princípio da ofensividade) , era a mesma: limitar o poder punitivo. No entanto, a regra da legalidade penal foi muito mais absorvida pelo discurso dogmático-jurídico do que o princípio da ofensividade, sendo oportuno, pois, analisar as razões pelas quais isso ocorreu. Algumas delas serão analisadas neste estudo como, por exemplo, a ausência de previsão explícita desse princípio nas Constituições, a suposta incompatibilidade desse princípio com a separação de poderes e com a própria regra da legalidade penal e a insegurança jurídica que a aplicação de princípios poderia gerar. Além disso, há um fator político de destaque: a consolidação da burguesia exigia a imposição de limites formais ao poder estatal, mas não limites materiais. Outro fator importante foi o advento do positivismo criminológico, no final do século XIX, que, ao confundir crime com doença, retornou ao paradigma do direito penal do autor que havia vigorado na Idade Média. Finalmente, para demonstrar o que impediu a consolidação do princípio da ofensividade especificamente no Brasil, será analisada a influência da doutrina europeia na dogmática nacional. / The political and philosophical ideas that influenced the creation of the principle of legality and the harm principle came from the Age of Enlightenment. Mainly during the Middle Age and the Old Regime, there was a confusion between crime and sin and people could be punished simply because of the whim of the sovereign, with no law. The arbitrariness were enormous. The reason for both theories that were born at the Age of Reason which required that the legal rules would have to be declared beforehand (principle of legality) and that the crime presupposed a harm or injury to other individuals (harm principle) were the same: to limit the power of punishment. However, it can be seen that the rule of the legality has been taken by the dogmatic and legal speech much more deeper than the harm principle, being opportune then, to analyze the reasons it happened. Some of them will be analyzed in this research, for instance, the absence of this explicit principle in the Constitutions, the alleged incompatibility of this principle with the separation of powers and the legality rule itself and the legal uncertainty that the application of principles could trigger. Furthermore, there is a major political factor: the consolidation of the bourgeoisie demanded the imposition of formal limits to the power of the state, but not material limits. Another important factor was the advent of positivist criminology, in the late nineteenth century, which, by confusing crime with illness, brought the paradigm of criminal law of the author, which was applied in the Middle Ages, back. At last, to show what stopped the consolidation of the harm principle specifically in Brazil, there will be an analysis of the influence of European doctrine in the Brazilian dogmatic.

À première vue, l’équité apparaît comme un phénomène absent du droit pénal. Il faut dire que l’idée de l’équité a été victime d’une histoire mouvementée autorisant les plus grandes confusions à son égard, lesquelles se sont cristallisées sous la période révolutionnaire. L’absence de référence explicite à la notion et l’anathème dont elle fait l’objet, dans une matière qui ne tolère aucun facteur déstabilisant, ne sauraient pourtant signifier que l’équité ait été totalement évincée du droit pénal. En réalité, elle est un phénomène occulte, dont il faut révéler les manifestations latentes, pour finalement convenir d’une utilisation implicite de la notion par le juge et le législateur. La rigidité inspirée par la légalité criminelle n’étant qu’apparente, l’équité jouit en effet d’une importante marge d’expression. D’une part, flexible, l’équité permet de réaliser une égalité concrète. Elle se trouve en conséquence implicitement tolérée dans la matière pénale en tant qu’outil d’harmonisation du droit. L’équité joue alors un rôle de complément à la loi pénale, en assurant le passage du général – la loi – vers le cas particulier. D’autre part, l’équité peut être mobilisée par le juge pénal, sans qu’il en ait nécessairement conscience, lorsque, confronté à un cas particulier, il décide de contourner l’application de la loi pénale qui risquerait de produire des effets iniques. Au service d’un jugement individuel subjectif, en référence à des valeurs issues du fond culturel dont il procède, l’équité s’exprime hors du cadre de la loi pénale. Elle se place alors en élément perturbateur venant concurrencer l’échelle des valeurs fixées par le législateur. Qu’elle vienne compléter ou concurrencer la loi, l’équité constitue toujours un moyen d’interroger les objectifs de la matière pénale dans la mesure où elle est souvent à l’origine d’évolutions législatives. En définitive, l’étude démontre que l’équité, sans être un principe autonome, est au coeur du droit pénal. / The lack of clear reference to fairness and the fact that it’s rejected in criminal law which does not tolerate any destabilizing factor does not mean that fairness is totally excluded from it. Actually it is a hidden phenomenon. Judges and legislators use the notion tacitly. As the rigidity of the principle of legality seems to be only apparent, fairness has in fact quite some room to express itself in criminal law.On the one hand, the flexibility it allows, and the underlying goal to carry out concrete equality both explain it be tolerated in some respects as a tool to standardize law. The need for flexibility is inherent to each legal system. Fairness has a complementary role for criminal law. It enables to guarantee the transition from generality – that is law – to particular cases. On the other hand, fairness can beimplemented by judges in order to circumvent the application of criminal law when it induces iniquitous consequences. As the expression of subjective individual judgment which refers to judges’ values, fairness is expressed beyond law itself. Ultimately, our study shows that fairness, without being an independent principle, is at the heart of criminal law, because at last, expressed as a complement or as an adversary to criminal law, looking for fairness often leads to legislative evolutions.