11 |
Den svenska koden för bolagsstyrning : En undersökning om ägarstruktur och legitimitet / The swedish corporate governance code : A study regarding ownership structure and legitimacyMelin, Sofia, Nordlander, Mathilda January 2014 (has links)
No description available.
|
12 |
Urban Growth And Conservation Problematic In Mugla, KarabaglarKoca, Feray 01 January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
Karabaglar is a rural area where agricultural community lives and which locates in the vicinity of Mugla town. It was registered as third grade natural site that must be preserved according to its rural character, natural and cultural assets and rural life. Property pattern consisting of private ownerships (yurts), specific road network that emerges from irims and kesiks, traditional houses, variety of vegetation, abundant water, self-sufficient agricultural production, and traditional life style are the main features that create and shape Karabaglar.
Kesiks, irims, kabaliks, and yurts are the major man-made components, which are unique to Karabaglar, and these characteristics conform to the natural landscape structure.
Urban growth, interventions due to misuse of lands, new housing demands of urban residents in Karabaglar resulted in urban pressure on the area. This situation puts forth the conservation necessity of Karabaglar.
This research analyzes the speculative housing development in Karabaglar, identifies the type of interventions and their physical, social, economic and environmental effects on Karabaglar / in addition, develops proposals for sustainability of the traditional pattern of Karabaglar.
|
13 |
Efficiency and safety in self-employed family forestry /Lindroos, Ola, January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Diss. (sammanfattning) Umeå : Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, 2007. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.
|
14 |
Pojetí vlastnických práv v Národním parku Šumava / A Property Rights Concept of The National Park ŠumavaKrejčí, Lucie January 2013 (has links)
The theme of the work is the management of the Sumava National Park. Publicized problems concerning the intervention rate, zoning, construction, management and status of local communities are conceived in the context of state ownership of the park and its public administration. Institutional change is possibly the logical solution. The cause of conflict in the SNP is searching with the use of stakeholder analysis. The method takes the form of interviews with representatives of interested parties, followed by a synthesis of observed attitudes and opinions. Despite some differences and divergent views on specific issues they see as the main obstacle agreements failure and legislation disregard, so it is a socio-political problem. The following is an economic aspect (lack of funds and poor management of them) and environmental (especially the form of zoning). Regime management change, however, they do not evaluate as a solution of the existing disagreements.
|
15 |
The relevance of the South African sectional titles law in interpretation and application of the sectional titles legislation of Botswana : an analysis of provisions pertaining to establishment of schemesSerumula, Doreen Lame 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (LLM )-University of Stellenbosch, 2004. / 150 leaves printed on single pages, preliminary pages i-xi and numbered pages 1-138. Includes bibliography. / Digitized at 600 dpi grayscale to pdf format (OCR), using a Bizhub 250 Konica Minolta Scanner. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The concept of sectional ownership has been unknown in the Botswana common law
because of the maxim superficies solo cedit, which does not recognize separate ownership
of apartments in a building. The law must always serve the felt and real needs of the times,
and in order to give effect to those needs, the Botswana Sectional Titles Act was enacted in
1999. It is based on the South African Sectional Titles Act of 1986, as amended, which
repealed the 1971 Act.
In this thesis, a comparative analysis of the South African and Botswana sectional titles law
is made to determine whether and, if so, how the existing position in the South African
sectional titles law could aid interpretation and application of the sectional titles legislation
of Botswana, specifically pertaining to aspects of establishment of sectional title schemes.
The main focus is on the legislative provisions of both jurisdictions. However, South
African case law is also considered.
Landownership and sectional titles is discussed, to determine whether sectional ownership
is genuine ownership. This entails a discussion on the publicity principle, which in the case
of land is normally achieved by means of registration in the Deeds Registries. The thesis
analyses the Botswana and South African statutes on the requirements and procedures
involved in the establishment of sectional title schemes to bring to light any shortcomings
that may exist in either of the two statutes. An understanding of the shortcomings of the
South African statute is relevant to the interpretation and application of the Botswana
statute. An examination of the procedural aspects of establishment of a sectional title
scheme, as well as the roles of the parties involved in the establishment thereof is
undertaken, so as to identify consequences that may ensue if they fail to comply with the
requirements of either of the statutes. Consequently, a comparative analysis on the effect of
registration of the sectional plan and opening of the sectional title register is made.
Although it is not suggested that the Botswana Act should be completely similar to the
South African Act, as Botswana may have its own peculiar circumstances, suggestions as to
the amendment of the Botswana statute are made. Amendments would make the Botswana
Act even more flexible, and would open up the possibilities of development to achieve greater access to land. Further more improvements to the Act will have to be made, some
before its implementation, and some after a period of application of the Act, as real
practical problems become apparent. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die konsep van deeltitel was tot dusver in Botswana se gemenereg onbekend weens die
maxim superficies solo cedit, wat nie aparte eienaarskap van woonstelle in 'n gebou erken
nie. Die wet moet altyd die werklike behoeftes van die tyd dien, en om te voldoen aan
daardie behoeftes is die Botswana Wet op Deeltitels in 1999 uitgevaardig. Dit is gebaseer op
die Suid-Afrikaanse Wet op Deeltitels van 1986, soos gewysig, wat die 1971 Wet herroep
het.
In hierdie tesis word 'n vergelykende studie gedoen van die Suid-Afrikaanse Wet op
Deeltitels en die gelyknamige Wet in Botswana om te bepaal of, en indien wel, hoe die
bestaande posisie in die Suid-Afrikaanse Wet op Deeltitels kan help met die interpretasie en
toepassing van die deeltitel wetgewing van Botswana, veral waar dit gaan oor die vestiging
van deeltitelskemas. Die tesis fokus op die wetgewende bepalings in albei lande, maar
konsentreer op probleemareas in die nuwe Deeltitel wet van Botswana.
Grondeienaarskap en deeltitels word bespreek om te bepaal of deeltiteleienaarskap werklike
eienaarskap is. Dit behels 'n bespreking van die publisiteitsbeginsel, waaraan gewoonlik, in
die geval van grond, voldoen word deur registrasie in die Akteregister. Die tesis ontleed die
Suid-Afrikaanse statuut en die statuut van Botswana wat gaan oor die vereistes en
prosedures betrokke by die vestiging van deeltitelskemas en enige tekortkominge wat
bestaan in enige van die twee statute. Dit is belangrik om die tekortkominge van die Suid-Afrikaanse
statuut te begryp, as die statuut van Botswana geinterpreteer en toegepas moet
word. Die prosedures wat gevolg word in die vestiging van 'n deeltitelskema, asook die
rolle van die verskillende partye betrokke, word bespreek sodat die gevolge as daar nie aan
die vereistes van die statuut voldoen word nie, identifiseer kan word. Gevolglik word 'n
vergelykende ontleding gedoen van die effek van registrasie van die deeltitelplan en die
opening van die deeltitelregister. Die slothoofstuk bevat aanbevelings vir verdere
navorsing.
Alhoewel daar nie voorgestel word dat die wet in Botswana identies aan die Suid-Afrikaanse
wet moet wees nie, (Botswana het te make met ander omstandighede) word
voorstelle aan die hand gedoen vir die wysiging van die wet in Botswana. Hierdie wysigings sal die wet meer buigsaam maak en daar sal meer moontlikhede wees vir
ontwikkeling wat groter toegang tot grond sal bewerkstellig. Verder sal daar verbeterings
aan die wet aangebring moet word nadat dit eers in werking getree het en die werklike
probleme kop uitsteek.
|
16 |
The regulation of water in Namibia in the context of property rights : a comparison with South African water legislation / John Matthew Thomas PintoPinto, John Matthew Thomas January 2014 (has links)
The Water Resources Management Act 24 of 2004 will change the water regime in
Namibia dramatically. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act provides
for this change by excluding private ownership of water from the new water law
dispensation.
This study focused on section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act and the
implication that this section will have on property rights in the Namibia. The
dissertation firstly outlines the historical development of ownership of water in
Namibia. It is indicated that private ownership of water was an established principle
under Roman-Dutch law. A further examination of Roman-Dutch law reveals that
surface water could be divided into private and public water. Public water belonged
to the whole nation, while ownership of private rivers was vested in the land owner.
Under South West Africa’s water legislation, the Irrigation and Water Conservation
Act 8 of 1912 and the Water Act 54 of 1956 maintained the distinction between
public and private water. However, the Water Act of 1956 expanded the definitions of
both public and private water, and acknowledged that the land owner where the
water found its source or flowed over, could exercise the exclusive use rights of such
water.
The Water Resources Management Act has been approved and published in the
Government Gazette. However, it has not yet come into force as a date for
commencement of the Act, as prescribed by section 138(1)(b), has not yet been
determined by the Minister. Once the Act is in force, the Water Act will be repealed
as a whole. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act will abolish the
private ownership of water in Namibia. This is clearly in violation of article 16 of the
Namibian Constitution of 1990, which provides for private ownership of water when
read with article 100. Therefore, the research concludes that the Water Resources
Management Act will dramatically affect property rights in Namibia. Under the Water
Resources Management Act there will be no private ownership of water, and the
affected person will have no recourse under the Act to claim compensation. / LLM (Environmental Law and Governance), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
17 |
The regulation of water in Namibia in the context of property rights : a comparison with South African water legislation / John Matthew Thomas PintoPinto, John Matthew Thomas January 2014 (has links)
The Water Resources Management Act 24 of 2004 will change the water regime in
Namibia dramatically. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act provides
for this change by excluding private ownership of water from the new water law
dispensation.
This study focused on section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act and the
implication that this section will have on property rights in the Namibia. The
dissertation firstly outlines the historical development of ownership of water in
Namibia. It is indicated that private ownership of water was an established principle
under Roman-Dutch law. A further examination of Roman-Dutch law reveals that
surface water could be divided into private and public water. Public water belonged
to the whole nation, while ownership of private rivers was vested in the land owner.
Under South West Africa’s water legislation, the Irrigation and Water Conservation
Act 8 of 1912 and the Water Act 54 of 1956 maintained the distinction between
public and private water. However, the Water Act of 1956 expanded the definitions of
both public and private water, and acknowledged that the land owner where the
water found its source or flowed over, could exercise the exclusive use rights of such
water.
The Water Resources Management Act has been approved and published in the
Government Gazette. However, it has not yet come into force as a date for
commencement of the Act, as prescribed by section 138(1)(b), has not yet been
determined by the Minister. Once the Act is in force, the Water Act will be repealed
as a whole. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act will abolish the
private ownership of water in Namibia. This is clearly in violation of article 16 of the
Namibian Constitution of 1990, which provides for private ownership of water when
read with article 100. Therefore, the research concludes that the Water Resources
Management Act will dramatically affect property rights in Namibia. Under the Water
Resources Management Act there will be no private ownership of water, and the
affected person will have no recourse under the Act to claim compensation. / LLM (Environmental Law and Governance), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
18 |
America’s Last Newspaper War: One Hundred and Sixteen Years of Competition between the <i>Denver Post</i> and <i>Rocky Mountain News</i>Ward, Kenneth J. 13 July 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0476 seconds