Obesity is a rapidly growing epidemic in the USA and worldwide. While the molecular and cellular mechanism of obesity is incompletely understood, studies have shown that excess adiposity may arise from increased adipogenesis (hyperplasia) and adipocyte size (hypertrophy) . Emerging evidence underscores autophagy as an important mediator of adipogenesis and adiposity. We are interested in the upstream regulator of adipocyte autophagy and how it impacts adipocyte biology. Given that metabolic stress activates transcription factor FoxO1 in obesity, my dissertation project is designed to depict the role of FoxO1 in adipocyte autophagy and biology. We found that FoxO1 upregulation was concomitant with elevation of autophagy activity during adipogenesis. Inhibition of FoxO1 suppressed autophagy flux and almost completely prevented adipocyte differentiation. For the first time, we found that the kinetics of FoxO1 activation followed a series of sigmoid curves that showed multiple activation-inactivation transitions during adipogenesis. Our study provides critical evidence casting light on the controversy in the literature that either persistent inhibition or activation of FoxO1 suppresses adipogenesis. In addition, we identified two central pathways that FoxO1-mediated autophagy regulated adipocyte biology: (1) to control lipid droplet growth via fat specific protein 27 (FSP27) in adipocytes; and (2) to differentially regulate mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCP) that have been implicated in browning of white adipose tissue and redox homeostasis. Mechanistically, FoxO1 appears to induce autophagy through the transcription factor EB (Tfeb), which was previously shown to regulate both autophagosome and lysosome. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated that FoxO1 directly bound to the promoter of Tfeb, and inhibition of FoxO1 attenuated the binding, which resulted in reduced Tfeb expression. To investigate the role of FoxO1 in vivo, we have developed mouse models to modulate FoxO1 in adipose tissue using an inducible Cre-loxP system. Tamoxifen is widely used to activate the inducible Cre recombinase that spatiotemporally control target gene expression in animal models, but it was unclear whether tamoxifen itself may affect adiposity and confounds phenotyping. Part of my dissertation work was to address this important question. We found that tamoxifen led to reduced fat mass independent of Cre, which lasted for 4-5 weeks. Mechanistically, Tamoxifen induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and augmented apoptosis. Our data reveals a critical period of recovery following tamoxifen treatment in the study of inducible knockout mice. Together, my dissertation work demonstrates FoxO1 as a critical regulator of adipocyte autophagy via Tfeb during adipogenesis. FoxO1-mediated autophagy controls FSP27, lipid droplet growth, and mitochondrial uncoupling proteins. Further study of FoxO1-autophagy axis in obese subjects is of physiological significance, and the investigation is under way. / Ph. D.

Background: In the ‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, the aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole had a ignificantly better efficacy and safety profile than tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) in postmenopausal patients. To compare the combined long-term clinical and economic benefits, we carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of anastrozole versus tamoxifen based on the data of the 100- month analysis of the ATAC trial from the perspective of the German public health insurance. Patients and Methods: A Markov model with a 25-year time horizon was developed using the 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial as well as data obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Results: Adjuvant treatment of EBC with anastrozole achieved an additional 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained per patient compared with tamoxifen, at an additional cost of D 6819 per patient. Thus, the incremental cost effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen at 25 years was D 21,069 ($ 30,717) per QALY gained. Conclusions: This is the first CEA of an AI that is based on extended follow-up data, taking into account the carryover effect of anastrozole, which maintains the efficacy benefits beyond therapy completion after 5 years. Adjuvant treatment with anastrozole for postmenopausal women with HR+ EBC is a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen. / Hintergrund: Bei der adjuvanten Therapie von postmenopausalen Patientinnen mit Hormonrezeptor-positivem (HR+) Mammakarzinom belegen die ATAC-100-Monatsdaten (ATAC-Studie: ‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) einen signifikanten Vorteil von Anastrozol gegenüber Tamoxifen in Bezug auf Rezidivrisiko und Verträglichkeit. Es wurde eine Kosten-Nutzwert-Analyse von Anastrozol im Vergleich zu Tamoxifen aus der Sicht des deutschen Gesundheitssystems durchgeführt. Material und Methoden: Als Berechnungsbasis wurde ein Markov- Modell zur Abschätzung der Kosteneffektivität entwickelt. Der Modellierungszeitraum umfasste 25 Jahre. Die Daten wurden anhand der ATAC-100-Monatsdaten, vorliegender Literatur und durch ein interdisziplinäres Expertenteam ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Eine adjuvante Therapie mit Anastrozol erzielte 0,32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) pro Patientin mehr, verglichen mit einer adjuvanten Tamoxifentherapie. Die zusätzlichen Kosten der Therapie mit Anastrozol lagen bei 6819 D pro Patientin. Im Vergleich mit Tamoxifen erzielte Anastrozol einen ICER (Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio) von 21 069 D (30 717 $)/QALY über den gesamten Modellierungszeitraum. Schlussfolgerung: Diese Kosten- Nutzwert-Analyse eines Aromatasehemmers basiert erstmals auf einer Datenanalyse, die auch das Follow-Up und den sogenannten Carryover- Effekt nach einer abgeschlossenen 5-Jahres-Therapie beinhaltet. Anastrozol ist auch nach dieser Analyse aus der Sicht des deutschen Gesundheitssystems eine kosteneffektive Therapieoption für postmenopausale Patientinnen mit einem HR+ frühen Mammakarzinom. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: In the ‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, the aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole had a ignificantly better efficacy and safety profile than tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) in postmenopausal patients. To compare the combined long-term clinical and economic benefits, we carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of anastrozole versus tamoxifen based on the data of the 100- month analysis of the ATAC trial from the perspective of the German public health insurance. Patients and Methods: A Markov model with a 25-year time horizon was developed using the 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial as well as data obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Results: Adjuvant treatment of EBC with anastrozole achieved an additional 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained per patient compared with tamoxifen, at an additional cost of D 6819 per patient. Thus, the incremental cost effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen at 25 years was D 21,069 ($ 30,717) per QALY gained. Conclusions: This is the first CEA of an AI that is based on extended follow-up data, taking into account the carryover effect of anastrozole, which maintains the efficacy benefits beyond therapy completion after 5 years. Adjuvant treatment with anastrozole for postmenopausal women with HR+ EBC is a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen. / Hintergrund: Bei der adjuvanten Therapie von postmenopausalen Patientinnen mit Hormonrezeptor-positivem (HR+) Mammakarzinom belegen die ATAC-100-Monatsdaten (ATAC-Studie: ‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) einen signifikanten Vorteil von Anastrozol gegenüber Tamoxifen in Bezug auf Rezidivrisiko und Verträglichkeit. Es wurde eine Kosten-Nutzwert-Analyse von Anastrozol im Vergleich zu Tamoxifen aus der Sicht des deutschen Gesundheitssystems durchgeführt. Material und Methoden: Als Berechnungsbasis wurde ein Markov- Modell zur Abschätzung der Kosteneffektivität entwickelt. Der Modellierungszeitraum umfasste 25 Jahre. Die Daten wurden anhand der ATAC-100-Monatsdaten, vorliegender Literatur und durch ein interdisziplinäres Expertenteam ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Eine adjuvante Therapie mit Anastrozol erzielte 0,32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) pro Patientin mehr, verglichen mit einer adjuvanten Tamoxifentherapie. Die zusätzlichen Kosten der Therapie mit Anastrozol lagen bei 6819 D pro Patientin. Im Vergleich mit Tamoxifen erzielte Anastrozol einen ICER (Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio) von 21 069 D (30 717 $)/QALY über den gesamten Modellierungszeitraum. Schlussfolgerung: Diese Kosten- Nutzwert-Analyse eines Aromatasehemmers basiert erstmals auf einer Datenanalyse, die auch das Follow-Up und den sogenannten Carryover- Effekt nach einer abgeschlossenen 5-Jahres-Therapie beinhaltet. Anastrozol ist auch nach dieser Analyse aus der Sicht des deutschen Gesundheitssystems eine kosteneffektive Therapieoption für postmenopausale Patientinnen mit einem HR+ frühen Mammakarzinom. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Les formes orales de traitements anticancéreux se sont considérablement développées récemment. La question de l’adhésion au traitement devient donc un nouvel enjeu en oncologie. Cette thèse aborde de façon générale le problème de l’adhésion aux traitements oraux en oncologie, et plus spécifiquement celui de la mesure en bases de données médico-administrativesde l’observance et de la persistance à l’hormonothérapie, traitement oral majeur dans le cancer du sein. Le point de vue retenu est celui de la pharmacoépidémiologie, à savoir l’étude des consommations pharmaceutiques en contexte clinique. La première partie de cette thèse fait le point sur les connaissances actuelles concernant l’adhésion à l’hormonothérapie - tamoxifène et inhibiteurs de l’aromatase (IA) - dans le cancer du sein. La seconde partie, reposant sur l’analyse de cohortes de patientes atteintes de cancer du sein sélectionnées à partir de (1) la UK General Practice Research Database et (2) des données de l’Assurance Maladie, a montré que : - Plus de la moitié des femmes de moins de 40 ans au diagnostic ne reçoivent plus de tamoxifène à 5 ans. Il s’agit du groupe de femmes le plus à risque d’arrêt prématuré de traitement. - Chez les femmes âgées de plus de 50 ans au diagnostic, les arrêts de traitement sont moins fréquents pour les IA que pour le tamoxifène. - Les déterminants associés à la non-persistance sont un faible soutien social et la déclaration précoce de non-prise de traitement par la patiente chez les femmes jeunes. Chez les femmes âgées, l’utilisation de médecines complémentaires et alternatives, la présence de comorbidités sont associées à une augmentation du risque d’arrêt de traitement. A contrario, la présence d’une poly-médication est associée à une diminution du risque d’arrêt.- Dans les études précédentes, une proportion importante de femmes reprend son traitement au moins une fois après l’avoir arrêté de façon prolongée. Les arrêts transitoires de traitements ont été pris en compte à l’aide de modèles multi-états. La probabilité d’arrêt de traitement estimée à partir de ces modèles est plus faible que celle mesurée par la méthode de Kaplan-Meier, après la première année de traitement. La non-adhésion à l’hormonothérapie est fréquente. Certains de ses déterminants sont modifiables ou peuvent servir à identifier précocement les patientes à risque de non-observance. La prise en compte des arrêts transitoires de traitement est importante dans la mesure de la persistance. L’adhésion est l’élément clé faisant le lien entre l’efficacité d’un traitement mesuréedans un essai clinique et son impact dans la vraie vie. Il est urgent de prendre conscience de l’importance de la non-adhésion des formes orales en oncologie / The use of oral anticancer therapies has significantly increased in recent years. Adherence to these therapies has therefore become a major issue in the field of oncology. This thesis focuses on the question of treatment adherence in oncology, and more specifically on the use of medical records and administrative databases to estimate adherence and persistence to hormonal therapy—now a major form of oral breast cancer therapy. Our perspective is based on pharmacoepidemiology, i.e. the study of drugs in a clinical setting. The first part of this thesis synthesizes current knowledge on adherence and persistence to hormonal therapy for BC – i.e. tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor therapies.The second part, which is based on the study of two cohorts constituted (1) from the UK General Practice Research Database and (2) from the French National Health Insurance System, demonstrates that - More than half of women younger than 40 at diagnosis do not receive any tamoxifen at 5years of follow-up. This group of women presents the highest rates of treatmentinterruption. - Among women over 50 at diagnosis, those receiving some form of AI therapy discontinue less frequently than those on tamoxifen treatment. - Determinants of non-persistence identified in the studies under review include low social support and self-reporting of non-compliance among younger women. Among older women, those using complementary or alternative medicine or suffering from comorbidities are more likely to discontinue their treatment, whereas women usingpolypharmacy are less likely to discontinue. - In previous studies, a large proportion of women who discontinued their treatment resumed after a prolonged gap. To account for these temporary treatment discontinuations, we used multi-state models. The probability of being off treatment estimated from these models is lower than that estimated from Kaplan-Meier estimates, after the 1st year of treatment. Adherence to hormonal therapy is largely suboptimal. Some of its determinants are modifiablefactors, while others can be used to identify sub-groups of patients at high risk of non-adherence. Accounting for temporary treatment discontinuation is important when measuring nonpersistence. Adherence is a key element for the translation of efficacy measured in clinical trials into effectiveness in real life. There is an urgent need to acknowledge the problem of nonadherence to oral therapy in oncology

Nesse trabalho avaliamos a sensibilidade a drogas in vitro de alguns isolados obtidos de pacientes brasileiros com leishmaniose cutânea. O microteste de MTT modificado mostrou-se eficaz para avaliação da sensibilidade in vitro de promastigotas de Leishmania e macrófagos de medula como modelo de infecção por L. (V.) braziliensis. A atividade de tamoxifeno e anfotericina B foi similar entre os isolados de Leishmania avaliados. Foi observada uma variação maior da sensibilidade ao Glucantime®, sendo que os isolados de L. (V.) braziliensis apresentaram maior sensibilidade a essa droga. Não foi observada correlação da resposta clínica dos pacientes ao tratamento com a atividade in vitro. Avaliamos também a eficácia de tamoxifeno no tratamento de camundongos BALB/c infectados com L. (V.) braziliensis. Observamos que 20 ou 30 mg/kg/dia de tamoxifeno por 15 dias resultou em redução no tamanho das lesões e carga parasitária em comparação com animais controle.Um isolado apresentou morfologia flagelar distinta daquela observada em promastigotas típicos de Leishmania. / In this work we evaluated the in vitro sensitivity to drugs of some isolates from Brazilian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. The modified MTT microtest was effective for evaluation of in vitro sensitivity of Leishmania promastigotes and macrophages from bone marrow as a model of infection by L. (V.) braziliensis. The activity of tamoxifen and amphotericin B was similar among isolates of Leishmania evaluated. Sensitivity to Glucantime®, was more variable with isolates of L. (V.) braziliensis presenting higher sensitivity to the drug. There was no correlation between clinical response to treatment with in vitro activity. We have also evaluated the effectiveness of tamoxifen in the treatment of BALB/c mice infected with L. (V.) braziliensis and observed that 20 or 30 mg/kg/day of tamoxifen for 15 days resulted in reduction in the size of lesions and parasite load when compared with control animals. One of the isolates presented atypical flagellar morphology.

The chimeric Alb-uPA SCID mouse that has been transplanted with human hepatocytes is a model to facilitate in vivo study of HCV. We explored further development of the model by using repopulation with immortalized human hepatocytes (IHH) in place of primary human hepatocyte (PHH) transplantation to support HCV infection. In vitro HCV studies typically utilize a human hepatoma cell line (Huh7) and rely on transfection with transcribed genomic RNA derived from a unique HCV strain (JFH1). Unfortunately, this system has not been successful in support of infection with serum-derived HCV (HCVser). IHH may offer an alternative since their differentiation status remains close to that of PHH. IHH transfected with HCV RNA (H77 or JFH1) or infected with HCVser showed stable intracellular and supernatant HCV RNA by real-time RT-PCR. IHH showed intracellular HCV NS3 proteins. HCV transfected or infected IHH secrete infectious HCVcc for in vivo and vitro. / Experimental Surgery

Recently reported data demonstrate that Vav3, a Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (Rho GEF) is overexpressed in breast tumors, coexpressed with ER, necessary for proliferation in breast cancer cells, and predictive of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapies in patients with ER+ tumors. Such data beg the question as to what roles Vav3 plays in modulation of steroid receptor activity in breast cancer and in resistance to current hormonal therapies. Using reporter assays, I provide novel evidence that Vav3 potentiates Estrogen Receptor activity and represses Androgen Receptor activity in breast cancer cells. Vav3 potentiates ligand-dependent estrogen receptor activity in the MCF-7. A truncated, constitutively active form of Vav3, caVav3 potentiates ligand dependent ER activity in both MCF-7 and T47D. Vav3 activates Rho GTPases through its GEF domain. ER potentiation by caVav3 is dependent upon GEF activity. A caVav3 mutant with defective GEF function represses basal and ligand-mediated ER activity in T47D. Although other studies have shown that Vav3 could activate various Rho GTPases, only constitutively active Rac1 mutants potentiated ER activity in both cell lines. Contrastingly, reporter assays were used to show that caVav3 inhibits ligand-mediated AR activity in the AR+ T47D cell line by both R1881 and DHT stimulation. caVav3-mediated repression of AR activity is GEF-dependent, as caVav3 GEF mutants potentiate AR activity. Constitutively active forms of Rho GTPases were found to repress AR activity to different extents, but R1881-mediated AR activity was only significantly repressed by caCdc42. My studies of the effect of androgens on AR protein by western blot show that androgens downregulate AR protein in the highly Vav3 positive T47D cell line. Previous studies have demonstrated that androgens stabilize AR protein in MCF-7, and I now provide evidence that overexpression of Vav3 or caVav3 reverses hormone-mediated AR protein stabilization in MCF-7. These data are especially relevant given recently published data that decreased AR protein levels contributed to failure of response to MPA in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further breast cancer studies may prove Vav3 to be a potential drug target in hormone dependent, hormone independent, and metastatic disease.

Sex steroids are inevitable in women. However, long-term exposure to sex steroids increases the risk of breast cancer. A complete understanding of sex steroid control of the breast and how it relates to breast cancer risk is still lacking. Angiogenesis and proteolytic enzyme activity are crucial for the process by which tumors evolve into a vascularized, invasive phenotype. Matrix metalloproteinases are potent matrixdegrading enzymes that affect several steps in tumor progression including angiogenesis. In the female reproductive organs, sex steroids regulate angiogenesis and MMP activity, yet little is known how sex steroids affect these crucial events in normal and malignant breast tissue. This thesis elucidates a link between sex steroids, MMP activity, and angiogenesis. It is shown that estradiol down-regulates while tamoxifen up-regulates the protein expression and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in human breast cancer cells in vitro and in human breast cancer xenografts in vivo. The results further suggest that a biological consequence of this regulation may be modulation of tumor angiogenesis. The net effect of adding tamoxifen to estradiol treatment was an increase in extracellular levels of the endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin and decreased levels of the tumor promoter TGF-β1 compared to estradiol treatment only. This was accompanied by reduced vasculature and decreased tumor growth. Similarly, a regulatory effect of estradiol and tamoxifen on endostatin generation was observed in normal human breast tissue by whole-tissue culture and microdialysis in human breast tissue in situ. In conclusion, the results presented in this thesis suggest previously unknown mechanisms of action of estradiol and tamoxifen in breast cancer and in normal human breast tissue, and novel means by which estradiol may tip the scale to favor angiogenesis. This knowledge may be important for the understanding of sex steroid dependent breast carcinogenesis and in the future development of tissue-specific preventive as well as therapeutic strategies against breast cancer.

No description available.

The aims of this thesis were to investigate the long-term effects of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, cardiovascular disease, and the incidence of secondary cancer. Between 1982 and 1992, postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer were included in a randomized clinical study of 2 or 5 years of postoperative tamoxifen therapy. The trial was planned by the Swedish Breast Cancer Group, and it included 4610 patients. Follow-up on causes of death, hospitalizations and secondary cancers were obtained from national population-based registries.  All-cause mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality and mortality from coronary heart disease were decreased in the 5-year group, but the incidence of endometrial cancer was increased (Paper I). The incidence and mortality of cerebrovascular diseases were increased during the active treatment phase, and reduced after the active treatment (Paper II). Similar results were seen for subgroups of cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and ischemic stroke. In the 5-year group, the morbidity from coronary heart disease was reduced during treatment but not after treatment was stopped (Paper III). This was the case also for heart failure and for atrial fibrillation/flutter. For secondary cancers the lung cancer risk was reduced, as well as the lung cancer mortality (Paper IV). An increased risk was observed for endometrial cancer, but appeared to decrease over time. The risk of contralateral breast cancer was reduced, with most of the reduction after treatment was stopped. For distance recurrences the risk was reduced both during treatment and a few years after treatment was stopped. The breast cancer mortality was also reduced, especially during the post-treatment phase.