1 |
文本與他者:列維納斯他勒目詮釋的基本特徵 / Text and the Other: Basic Principles of Levinas's Interpretation of the Talmud鄧元尉, Teng ,Yuan-wei Unknown Date (has links)
本文嘗試以法國哲學家列維納斯的宗教作品為主要素材,探索其他勒目詮釋的詮釋學蘊義。首先,本文探索這詮釋工作的傳統面向。筆者將從拉比猶太教的詮釋傳統出發來定位列維納斯的詮釋工作,釐清詮釋作為保存、翻譯、接待、抵抗等基本特徵的傳統根源,這些特徵都將在之後的論述中獲得進一步的開展。其次,本文探索這詮釋工作的時代面向。筆者嘗試釐清列維納斯的他勒目詮釋在當代猶太意識中所扮演的角色,這將把焦點放在猶太與希臘間的翻譯關係上,並將這論題推進到以以色列國為焦點的政治論域中。最後,本文探索這詮釋工作的哲思面向。筆者試圖關聯起列維納斯的哲學主題,在「同一─他者─第三方」的基本架構中,考察「詮釋者─文本─人民」的詮釋關係,藉由詮釋的倫理學與詮釋的社會學之建構,將列維納斯的詮釋工作界定為是一種「為他的詮釋學」,其基本特徵乃是一種「藉由文本走向他者」的詮釋行動。 / As a well-known interpreter of the Talmud, Emmanuel Levinas created a new paradigm of interpretation of this collection of Jewish law. In this thesis, I attempt to argue that there are some hermeneutical implications in his works on the Talmud. First, in the traditional dimension, I claim that rabbinic Judaism as the root of Levinas's religious works characterizes his interpretations of the Talmud as conservation, translation, hospitality and resistance. Second, in the contemporary dimension, I point to the role that Levinas's thought plays in the Jewish consciousness today by illustrating the relation of translation between Judaism and Greek culture and the problem of the state of Israel. Third, in the philosophical dimension, I try to construct the threefold hermeneutical model "interpreter-text-people" based on the conceptual structure of "the same-the other-the third" in Levinas's philosophical works. My final point is that Levinas's hermeneutics is a "hermeneutics for the other", which is characterized as an interpretive action of "from the reader to the other through the text."
|
2 |
暴力與和平:列維納斯的道德形上學及其政治蘊義研究 / Violence and Peace: Studies on Levinas's Moral Metaphysics and its Political Implications鄧元尉, Teng ,Yuan-wei Unknown Date (has links)
本文嘗試以和平問題與暴力問題為焦點,重新理解列維納斯道德形上學之梗概,並解決其政治蘊義所造成的疑難。列維納斯的哲學基本上是一種和平哲學,其所論之和平乃被界定為對暴力的非暴力抵抗,並在其前期作品中具體展現為倫理學對政治學的抵抗。但此一抵抗關係隨著列維納斯的思想進程而逐漸呈現出一種兩歧性,從而引發其思想是否前後不一致的批判,亦產生對和平之純粹性的質疑。筆者的努力即在於說明此一疑難的成因並構想一調和方案。筆者主張,應將列維納斯的思想進程視為一條闡發其倫理學之政治蘊義的思路,但這條從倫理學走到政治學的和平之路,須途經社會學的迂迴方才可能,而如此一種中介性的社會學之建構,惟在列維納斯的他勒目詮釋中獲得。因此,本文綜觀列維納斯的哲學作品與宗教作品,先是闡述責任倫理學的和平蘊義,再從其宗教詮釋學對以色列社群的刻畫得到那基於倫理學之社會學的基本模式,最後參照解構主義的批判,在對質疑政治學與回答社會學的構想中,統括列維納斯的倫理思想與政治思想。 / Peace, as the non-violence resistance to violence, is one of the main topics of Levinas's philosophy. In this dissertation, I attempt to summarize Levinas's moral metaphysics and reflect its political implications by investigating the relation of peace and violence. The relation which in Levinas's early works could be seen as an opposition between ethics and politics has some ambiguity in his later works that emerges in a dialectical way: ethics both opposes and demands politics. My opinion is that this problem can be solved by referring to his religious works, especially his interpretations of the Talmud. In brief, the path of argument is from ethics to politics through sociology. First, I describe the basic principles of Levinas's ethical metaphysics by illustrating the typology of the other and the genealogy of the same, i.e. the phenomenology of the face of the other and the transformation from the same in itself to the same for the other. Second, I find the basic political model in terms of the hermeneutics of Talmud, especially the texts about the people of Israel. Final, I try to appeal to the postmodern thoughts in order to reconcile the risk of violence in Levinas's religious works, and integrate Levinas's ethical thoughts and political thoughts by constructing the politics of questioning and the sociology of response.
|
Page generated in 0.0256 seconds