11 |
中國大陸對台政策之走向分析::以《反分裂國家法》個案為例 / Mainland China’s policies toward Taiwan: trending analysis by using the case of “Anti-Secession Law”劉性仁, Liu, Shing Ren Unknown Date (has links)
問題意識:
1. 中國大陸對台政策法制化是否是必要性?中國大陸對台政策過去停留在人治的時代,透過各種政治性文件的宣示,顯然從台灣各項反應,並沒有達成中共預期的目標,因此對台政策法制化實有研究的必要性。
2. 反分裂國家法的原因、過程、內容及所產生的效果究竟為何?值得深入的探討。
3. 反分裂國家法在出台時引發軒然大波,但出台後就刻意低調與淡化處理,其間原因值得探究。
4. 探討反分裂國家出台後對於兩岸關係政策走向之探討。
研究價值:
1.從法制化的角度來探討反分裂國家法,有別於過去研究者單就反分裂國家法本身來探討。
2.從中國大陸對台政策法制化前後來探討中國大陸對台政策,以突顯對台政策法制化的重要性,不同於法制化前或法制化後單方面討論。
3.從法律層面與政治層面來探討反分裂國家法這部具有高度政治性的法律,而不是單純一方面來檢視反分裂國家法。
4. 本論文在資料收集上,作者透過親身至北京大學學習的經驗,得到第一手的書面資料,並透過兩岸學者專家之接觸與訪談,以釐清關於反分裂法之諸多爭議問題,不同於在兩岸任一方來看待反分裂國家法。
研究動機:
1. 作者自身個人的興趣與學科背景。
2. 適逢對台政策法制化的關鍵點。
3. 善盡研究者的學術及社會責任 。
4. 不負兩岸求學的機會。
研究目的:
1. 希望能夠瞭解中國大陸對台政策法制化的意義與必要性。
2. 藉由反分裂國家法制訂的動機、過程、內容探討,以瞭解較接近真相的反分裂國家法。
3. 使台灣民眾能真正瞭解中國大陸對於《反分裂國家法》之看法,使助於釐清一些流於政治認同之想當然爾之偏見,對於一些爭議性的條文與不確定的法律概念,能夠有更客觀之學術分析。
4. 透過《反分裂國家法》的研究,以觀察中國大陸對台政策之走向。
研究方法:文獻分析法(Document Analysis)、歷史研究法(Historical Research)、訪談法(Interview Research)。
研究途徑:法律研究途徑〈(Legal Approach)〉、系統理論〈System Theory〉
研究內容:本論文計分六章,約二十五萬餘字。
章節內容:
第一章部份前言,主要討論的問題包括問題緣起與研究價值、研究動機與目的、文獻檢討、研究方法、研究途徑與研究架構、研究設計這其中又包括研究假設、研究範圍與章節安排)、研究限制及概念界定,第一章是本文的核心重點部分。
第二章部分主要探討中國大陸對台政策法制化前之分析,首先在第一節中,探討反分裂國家法出台前中國大陸對台政策;在第二節中,探討反分裂國家法出台前中國大陸對台政策所存在的問題;在第三節中主要探討對台政策法制化的意義。
第三章部分主要探討法制化下中國大陸對台政策,第一節主要探討反分裂國家法的制訂原因與過程;第二節主要討論反分裂國家法的內容;第三節主要探討反分裂國家法的執行與相關問題探討。
第四章部分主要探討反分裂國家法與國際社會反應,在第一節中主要討論西方國家處理國家分裂問題之法制化實例;第二節主要討論國際社會對反分裂國家法出台後的態度;第三節主要討論台、美間的台灣關係法與台、中間的反分裂國家法。
第五章部分主要探討反分裂國家法出台後對台灣的影響分析,在第一節中,探討反分裂國家法的規範意義;第二節中探討反分裂國家法的主要爭點;在第三節主要是對反分裂國家法出台後對台政策走向探討
第六章部分是本文結論,包括研究發現與研究建議。
【關鍵詞】:反分裂國家法、法制化、法律研究途徑、系統理論、一個中國 / Problem Consciousness:
1 Is legislation of Taiwan policy a necessity? The policy towards Taiwan was formerly manipulated by persons in-charge; through enunciation of political vision, but producing less expected clout. It is, therefore, pushing for a more decisive legislation.
2.What is the reason, process, content and effect about 「Anti-Secession Law」? Try to
find out the actual answers on causes, involved procedures, content and its
repercussion.
3.「Anti-Secession Law」results in discussing and disagreement. But after drawing up,
What is the reason why PRC deals with it silently.
4.What is the trending Analysis towards Taiwan of Mainland China?
Research Value:
1.Focused the mainly on legislation, lest discussing 「Anti-Secession Law」itself.
2.Expanding both stages: 「Pre- Anti-Secession Law」 and 「Post- Anti-Secession Law」
3.Emplasizing the legal and public 「Anti-Secession Law」, lest the unilateral 「Anti-Secession Law」itself.
4 On Collecting data: By studying in Peking University and personal contacts with experts and scholars of cross-strait relationship.
Research Motivation:
1.Presonal interest and academic background.
2. As if on one, it was time where legislation of the Anti-Secession Law and police took place.
3.Research responsibility in academic and social.
4.Opportunity available for the cross-strait study.
Study Goal:
1. Understanding Mainland China’s Taiwan policy formulation under the impacts of
the legislation ,institutionalization and its means and imperatives.
2. Understanding the actual stage of affairs under the Anti-Secession Law pertaining to
its motivation, procedure, and content.
3. Assisting the Taiwan public to have a clearer understandings of the Anti-Secession
Law, lest the political bias from its statutory articles.
4.To have a clearer understanding of its logic applied .
Study Method:Literature analysis & study method、Historical study method、 Interview method.
Study Approach :Legal Approach、System Theory
Content of Study : There are six chapters of the Thesis, in total of about 250000
characters.
Key Words:
Anti-Secession Law、Legislation、Legal Approach、System Theory、One China
|
12 |
分裂國家統一政策執行機關之研究-以組織互動探討德韓模式對我國之啟示 / The Comparative Reseach in the Implemental Organization of the Reunofocation Policy about the Divided Countries林季良, Lin, Chi Laung Unknown Date (has links)
本論文內容大體上可分為兩部份,其中之一是組織理論與政策執行模式的探究與對相關研究整理,另一部份則是對西德之「全德事務部」或稱「兩德關係部」、南韓之「國土統一院」及我國之「國家統一委員會」、「行政院大陸委員會」及「財團法人海峽交流基金會」等機關組織進行分析與比較。因之,以前者為經,後者為緯,亦即由組織理論的觀點分析執行國家統一政策之機關,並比較西德、南韓與中華民國三者前述機關組織的相似與相異處,並希望藉由這些組織的安排與制度化過程中所受到之因素影響的探究以瞭解其院作對政策績效亦即對此三個國家統一政策在執行成果上有何影響。
|
13 |
我國爭取參與聯合國問題之研究 / Research on our bid to participate the U.N.劉永健, Liu, Yeong-Jainn Unknown Date (has links)
No description available.
|
14 |
中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流策略之分析陳姝廷 Unknown Date (has links)
2005年3月14日通過「反分裂國家法」,把廿多年來對台方針政策法律化,不僅上升為國家意志,且規範兩岸關係,使反分裂、維護國家主權領土完整有法可依。中共的「反獨」政策是配合國際戰略,為其「和平崛起」創造穩定的週邊環境,以「爭取談、準備打、不怕拖」作為「反獨」的最高原則。因此,我們可發現,中共制定「反分裂國家法」後,對台是以「底線清晰、彈性務實」與「軟硬兼施、分而治之」為指導方針,更特別強調如何與台灣推展交流合作。所以在對台交流作法上更趨靈活細緻,如釋放選擇性利益,拉攏我特定地域、黨派、階層、行業,以及擴大交流,深化兩岸經貿關係,更強調「主動出撃、區別對待、軟硬兼施、入島入心」,積極推動兩岸交流、給予我國民待遇以及廣邀我青年學子赴大陸交流等等。
本論文共分六章,茲將其內容分述如下:
(一)第一章為緒論,主要說明本文的研究動機與目的,相關文獻回顧、研究途徑與研究方法、研究範圍與限制以及研究架構等。
(二)第二章探討中共對台交流策略的環境因素,先以中國大陸內部因素加以分析,再對國際因素以及台灣因素進行探討。
(三)第三章敘述胡錦濤主政下「反分裂國家法」制定之內容與意涵,首先分析胡錦濤主政下對台政策新思維,其次探討「反分裂國家法」之內容及意涵,最後分析「反分裂國家法」之意涵。
(四)第四章是探討中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流策略與作法,首先探討「反分裂國家法」之目標,再討論中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流策略。最後探討中共制定「反分裂國家法」後對台交流作法。
(五)第五章探討中共對台交流策略之評估,如中共在「反分裂國家法」後對台交流作法更趨務實,企圖打開兩岸僵局,並且以國民待遇化爭取民間,以及造成我政府壓力。
(六)第六章結論,探討中共對台交流策略之研究發現與建議,為使台海地區保持和平,應繼續爭取美國的支持以及加強兩岸交流合作。 / Ever since the “Anti-Secession Law” passed on March 14, 2005, it has legalized Taiwan policy in the last twenty years, which has not only elevated national volition but also confined the cross-Straits relations to gain a legal ground for “anti-secession” and to preserve national right and its territorial intact. The “anti-idependence”policy of Chinese Communists is tied in international strategy to create stable surroundings for its “peace initiatives,” and to observe the ultimate principle of “anti-independence” in the context of “negotiation first, ready for war and no fears of prolonging.” Therefore we found out that after Chinese Communists have set their“Anti-Secession Law,”with provided guidelines to treat Taiwan under“clear bottom line, flexible and practical” and “hard and soft play, splitting will rule” principles and a strong emphasis on promoting interexchange collaborations with Taiwan. Therefore the execution of interexchange collaborations with Taiwan are seen rather flexible and thorough in terms of optional interest concerns with an intention to release preferential to certain regions, parties, bureaucracy and industries and expanding interexchange scope, deepening cross-Straits economic relations. Furthermore stressed on the propaganda of “making initiatives, discrepancy treatments, hard and soft play, penetrating island to win hearts” with such aggressive interexchange activity promotions and an offer of national treatment and wide open policy for academics exchange in Mainland China to our youngsters.
This thesis contains six chapters and the descriptions of each chapter as follows:
A. Chapter One is a preface, which mainly describes research motive and objective of this article, and it includes the related literatures with research channels and methods, scope and limitation and the research restructure.
B. Chapter Two is discovering the environmental factors of Taiwan interexchange strategy by the Chinese Communists, first part will analyze the internal factor of Mainland China and then global and Taiwan accordingly.
C. Chapter Three describes the contents and meanings of “Anti-Secession Law” led by Hu Jintao, first will be the analysis of new aspirations toward Taiwan by Hu Jintao, second will discuss the contents and meanings of “Anti-Secession Law” and last will be the analysis of the meanings of “Anti-Secession Law.”
D. Chapter Four is discussing the Taiwan interexchange strategy and execution of “Anti-Secession Law” set by the Chinese Communists. It will discuss the objective of “Anti-Secession Law” first and then Taiwan interexchange strategy after the setting of “Anti-Secession Law” by the Chinese Communists, finally, it will discuss the implementation of Taiwan interexchange of “Anti-Secession Law” set by the Chinese Communists.
E. Cheaper Five is a discussion of Taiwan interexchange strategy assessment by the Chinese Communist such as pragmatic ways of dealing Tawain interexchange after setting “Anti-Secession Law” by the Chinese Communists in order to break the deadlock of the cross-Straits and treat our civil with national treatment to put pressures on our government.
F. Chapter Six will be the conclusion of this thesis; the main emphasis will be on exploring the discovery and proposition of Taiwan interexchange strategy research by the Chinese Communist with an objective in maintaining peaceful state of Taiwan Strait and continuously rallying for the support form the United States and reinforce the collaborations of cross-Straits interexchange.
|
15 |
兩岸打擊海上犯罪之研究柯繼明 Unknown Date (has links)
近年來海峽兩岸交流熱絡,海上犯罪問題日益嚴重,主要有毒品、槍械及農漁畜產品等走私、偷渡、洗錢、破壞海洋環境資源、海盜及其他非法越界捕魚、船舶碰撞、絞網等海上糾紛所引發之刑事案件等,除對台灣海域治安造成嚴重威脅外,更因事涉敏感的兩岸關係,處理益形艱辛複雜。
由於兩岸兩會制度性協商迄無成果,兩岸刑事司法互助僅剩個案處理模式,因此在防制海上犯罪的時效與範圍方面均大打折扣而漏洞百出,無法構成周延的刑事偵防系統,對兩岸海上法律秩序與民眾福祉造成威脅。
本論文兼從學理與實務角度出發,以兩岸共同打擊海上犯罪為前提,首先探討目前兩岸海上犯罪之概況,歸納海上犯罪之類型,分析其未來發展趨勢,次就兩岸共同打擊海上犯罪之機制予以檢視,探討雙方在打擊海上犯罪之具備能量與面臨之共同性與個別性困境,並比較分裂國家德、韓及美國、古巴等國共同打擊海上犯罪之模式,探討其在法制面與執行面之特點,以作為未來兩岸合作之借鏡。最後結合因應當前兩岸情勢發展,在兩岸共同打擊海上犯罪上,分別就如何建立合作查緝基礎、建構兩岸單一聯繫窗口及建立兩岸刑事司法互助法制基礎等三方面,提出具體可行之策略與作法,期能作為政府及執法機關處理因應之道,進而達成兩岸共同打擊海上犯罪之目標。
|
Page generated in 0.0178 seconds