摘要 本研究主要在Pierre Bourdieu的文化資本（Cultural Capital）理論架構下，使用「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」（Taiwan Education Panel Survey）2001年到2005年三波的追蹤樣本，研究學生的「學生文化資本」、「父母文化資本」以及「親子文化資本」對高中職、五專生的學習成就之影響。學生文化資本是以學生本身的文化活動參與和學校文化社團參與為指標；父母文化資本是以父母的教育程度為指標；而親子文化資本是以學生才藝課程和親子文化活動參與為指標。本研究檢證各發展階段（國小、國中、高中）中不同文化資本的動態模式，以及和學生學習成就的關係，以瞭解文化資本在台灣教育體制中所扮演的角色。研究結果如下： 1.在控制了人口與家庭背景因素之後，發現「學生文化資本」比「親子文化資本」對學習成就的影響力較大，高中階段的「學生文化資本」對學習成就的效果最大。 2.在性別方面：女生相較於男生，受到「父母文化資本」的影響較大。女生的「學生文化資本」都很高且多元，但對學習成就的影響較小；男生的「學生文化資本」不受家庭低收入的負向影響，且對學習成就影響比較大。 3.當父母為低教育程度的情況下，學生可藉由「文化資本」提升學習成就，但所提升的學習成就仍不及父母為高教育者的學習成就平均數，這意味著「文化向上流動模式」僅能達到向上微調的效果，但仍無法擺脫大環境的限制。 / Abstract This thesis examines the relationship between cultural capital and high school students’ achievement based on the cultural capital theory of Pierre Bourdieu. This thesis operationalizes the concept of cultural capital into three types: parents', students', and intergenerational cultural capital. Parents’ cultural capital is defined by parents’ education; Students’ cultural capital is defined by participating in students’ cultural activities and the cultural organizations in school; Intergenerational cultural capital is defined by students’ cultural skills class and parents-children’s cultural activities. Using data gathered by the Taiwan Education Panel Study (TEPS) in 2001, 2003 and 2005, the research estimates the effects of these three types of cultural capital on high school student's academic achievements in three stages of schooling (elementary, junior high, and senior high). The major findings of the thesis are: 1.Controlling demographic and family background factors, “student’s own cultural capital,” in particular at the stage of senior high, has more impact on academic achievement than “intergenerational cultural capital” does. 2.In comparison with male students, female students have a higher level of cultural capital, which is also more diversified. The cultural capital of female students is influenced more by their parents’ cultural capital. However, the cultural capital of female students has a fairly small effect on their academic achievement. In contrast, the cultural capital of male students, which is not negatively affected by family’s low income, has a greater effect on their academic achievement. 3.The students with parents of lower levels of education could improve their academic achievement with their own cultural capital. This improvement, however, is not enough to make up the achievement gap between disadvantaged and advantaged students.

本研究運用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（Taiwan Education Panel survey）之2001年與2003年針對同一批國中生（N=16,530）蒐集的資料，檢證James Coleman代間封閉性網絡有助於學生學習成效之理論。對於Coleman的理論，過往實證的研究發現並不一致。台灣亦有研究顯示，在升學制度的壓力下，家長間網絡不見得出現效力。本研究旨在檢證兩種不同家長網絡形式在學校與個體層次對學生學習成效的影響，研究結果發現：（1）個人層次方面，僅校外家長連帶有益於學習成效，但社會經濟地位具有間接影響力；（2）學校層次方面，則僅代間封閉性網絡具影響力，封閉性越高越有益於學生學習成效，且其影響力與社會經濟地位無關。

課後學生自主的時間能否自己自律繼續學習，是值得關注的議題。本研究欲瞭解學生從國中到高中自律學習發展情況，以台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫的2939追蹤樣本，進行潛在成長曲線模型分析，結果發現： （1）兩性學生從國中到高中的自律學習發展並無顯著差異。 （2）台灣學生從國中到高中的自律學習呈現遞增狀況。 （3）國中高自律學習的學生到高中的自律學習成長有限；而國中低自律學習的學生到高中自律學習成長幅度較大。 （4）學生家庭社經地位越高、父母學校參與和接納的程度越高，學生國中時期的自律學習情況會越好；但是學生家庭社經地位越高、父母學校參與程度越高，對於學生國中到高中自律學習成長有限，至於父母接納則無顯著影響關係 （5）國中自律學習良好的學生，有較良好的分析能力；但是高中學生的自律學習無法有效預測其分析能力。 依據上述研究結果將提出相關結論與建議以供參考。

本研究探討影響學生學業成就的學校、家庭、學生個人及背景因素，研究中以後設分析的方法計算出許多自變項的效應量大小。本研究的資料取自台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（TEPS），包括2868名學生在2001年至2007年間接受的四波追蹤調查資料。研究結果發現，學校、家庭、學生個人及背景因素對學業成就之平均效應量具有顯著差異，其中以學生的「先前學業成就」具有最大的效應量，對綜合能力、數學能力及一般分析能力的效應量分別是2.39、1.45和1.90；其次為「背景因素」（效應量分別為.65、.53、.59）；再其次則為「家庭因素」及「學生投入」，但此兩者效應量小，且彼此間無顯著差異；而學校因素的平均效應量最小。最後，本研究針對研究結果提出多項教育實務的建議。 / The purpose of this study is to examine the longitudinal effects of school, family, student, and demographic factors on students’ academic achievement. A method of meta-analysis was used to estimate the magnitude of the effect size of various dependent variables. The data was obtained from Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS). The members of the tracked panel of 2868 high school students were selected as samples for this present research. The tracked panel received four waves of questionnaires and standard tests from 2001 to 2007. The results of the present analysis shows significant differences between the mean effect sizes of the factors associated with academic achievement, and that students’ prior achievement had the largest effect size of 2.39, 1.45, and 1.90, respectively, based on the comprehensive ability score, the general analytic ability score, and the mathematic ability score. The demographic factor showed the second largest mean effect size (.65, .53, .59), larger than that of the family factor and students’ engagement, which both showed small effect without significant differences from each other. And the school factor showed the least mean effect size. In addition, it was found that the mean effect of all the variables based on the comprehensive ability score (.43) was significantly larger than that based on the general analytic ability score and on the mathematic ability score, specifically. Practical implications and suggestions are given in the present research after the general discussion of the research findings.

本研究目的探討：（一）家庭社經地位、父親參與、母親參與對學習成就結構的關係模式；（二）運用多群組樣本測量模式，比較不同家庭社經地位（高、中、低三群組）學生其父親、母親參與對學習成就的關係模式。 本研究採用「結構方程模式」建立上述模式，並採用TEPS 2001「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」中9,141位國一學生（只以親生父母親同住子女）及其父親、母親為研究樣本。 本研究歸納出以下結論茲分述如下： 一、 結構方程模式考驗結果顯示「家庭社經地位、父親、母親參與和學習成就模式」與TEPS次級資料達到良好適配，表示家庭社經地位對學習成就具有正相關直接影響效果，同時父親間接參與對學習成就無顯著影響，而母親間接參與則有達到正向顯著影響。 二、 不同社經地位學生，其父親參與對子女學習成就無顯著影響，但母親參與對子女學習成就則呈正相關顯著差異。 三、 「高家庭社經地位學生的父親參與、母親參與對學習成就的關係模式」為良好適配指標，但是父親參與未達顯著性，母親參與程度則達正相關顯著水準。 四、 「中家庭社經地位學生的父親參與、母親參與對學習成就的關係模式」亦為良好適配指標，其中父親參與仍然未達顯著性，母親參與程度則達正相關且顯著水準。 五、 「低家庭社經地位學生的父親參與、母親參與對學習成就的關係模式」適配度指標最佳，但是父親參與仍然未達顯著性，母親參與則依然呈正相關顯著。 最後，依據上述研究發現，就研究結果與研究方法兩方面，將提出相關研究建議以供教育實務上及未來研究之參考。 / The purposes of this study are to explore the effects of mother and father involvement between socioeconomic status（SES）and their children academic achievement. The data of the public released core panel data from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey（TEPS）in 2001 was used. The sample was drawn from TEPS and was constituted by 9,141 adolescents who were seventh graders and lived with their birth parents in 2001. This study explores that what role parental involvement plays between SES and academic achievement, and uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to create a mother and father involvement model that affects academic achievement. In addition, the multi-groups model was used to analyze how the SES affects mother and father involvement and children academic achievement. The results are summarized as follows: 1. The test result of SEM suggested that the proposed “Model of effects of SES/parental involvement on children academic achievement” fit the core panel data well. This showed SES had direct effect on academic achievement and had indirect effect through mother and father involvement. 2. Among all the SES groups, father involvement positively correlated with children’s academic achievement but not significantly. Mother involvement showed positive correlation and significantly. 3. The model of effect of parental involvement in higher SES family fits the data well, but father involvements positively correlated with children academic achievement and not significantly. Mother involvement positively and significantly correlated with children’s academic achievement. 4. The model of effect of parental involvement in middle SES family fits the data well. Father involvement still positively but not significantly correlated with children’s academic achievement; mother involvement positively and significantly correlated with children’s academic achievement. 5. The model of effect of parental involvement in low SES family fits the data best. Father involvement positively correlated with children’s academic achievement but not significantly; mother involvement also positively and significantly correlated with children’s academic achievement. Finally, the study discusses the implications of parental involvement and suggests directions for future research.

學習表現為教育社會學中的重要議題，其中城鄉間的學習表現差距受到重視。過去研究認為家庭背景與地區的教育資源是影響學生學習表現的主要因素，然而這些研究缺乏班級因素與同儕效果的分析。因此本研究使用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（Taiwan Education Panel Survey, TEPS）在2001年與2003年的國中生樣本，以階層線性模型（Hierarchical Linear Modeling, HLM）分析國一班級同儕學習投入對國三數學表現的影響，學習投入以學生為課業所付出的時間為指標。分析結果發現：(1)學生數學表現的總變異中有24%來自班級因素的影響，76%為學生因素。(2)國三數學表現、個人學習投入與班級同儕學習投入有城鄉差距。(3)在控制其他變項下，個人學習投入、班級同儕學習投入對數學表現有正向效果。(4)班級所在地區的都市化程度透過班級同儕學習投入間接影響國三數學表現。 / Academic performance has been an important topic of research on educational sociology for a long time, while urban-rural differences have been already well documented in literatures. In the past, the literature indicated that the key factors to affecting academic performance are family background and the educational resources. But these researches have ignored the factors of class level and peer effects. In this study, the data are from Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) in 2001 and 2003, use Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to assess how peer engagement affects junior high students’ mathematics performance. The time students spend in studying is an index of engagement. The main finding are: (1) This research model accounts for 76% of the variation in student level and for 24% of the class variation in class level with regard to mathematical performance. (2) Students in the urban and rural city show a differences in their mathematics performance, student’s own engagement and peer engagement. (3) When controlling variables, student’s own engagement and peer engagement have positive effect on mathematics performance. (4) Urbanization levels indirectly affect mathematics performance through peer engagement.

本研究採用「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」（TEPS）調查結果，對台灣地區高中職學生個人特徵、家庭背景以及學生生活進行次級資料分析，探討各種因素與學業表現之關聯性。 　　本研究選取資料庫中之9,750樣本數，以資料庫綜合分析能力測驗成績作為應變數，選取性別及手足數目等12個自變數，以Logit Model為實證模型分析，再以Ordered Probit Model進行實證結果穩健性檢驗（Robustness Check），發現兩者結果呈現一致性，本研究發現： 一、男性成績較女性成績為佳，曾經或現在就讀資優班者成績較為優異。 二、家庭手足數目對學生學業成績表現有負向影響，雙親教育程度、家庭收入愈高及家庭文化資本愈豐富對子女學業表現有正向顯著影響；家庭親子關係、父母閱讀頻率對於子女學業表現則無顯著影響。 三、補習、參加社團活動以及校隊培訓對學業成績有正向影響；打工及結交行為偏差朋友則對學業成績有負向影響。 　　本研究提出教育政策方向建議如下： 一、建議文創產業主管機關以差別取價之價格誘因方式提高親子參與藝文活動之意願，並持續鼓勵文創產業提供學校學生及家長參與藝文展演活動機會。 二、教育主管機關應持續執行對（中）低收入戶子女學雜費補助之政策，並建立對高中職學校社團活動之管理制度，另應加強學生品性教育管理。 / This study analyzes the association between personal characteristics, family background, the life of students and academic achievement of students in senior high school. The data have adapted Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS). The research has used 9,750 samples in the database. The dependent variable is the test scores of students while the independent variables are gender, the number of sibling, etc. This study has used Logit Model for empirical analysis and Ordered Probit Model for robustness check of the results. The research findings indicate that both models have similar conclusions, which are shown as follows. Firstly, the academic achievement of males is better than that of females. Moreover, students who are in the gifted and talented class have a better performance than those who are not in. Secondly, the number of sibling has a negative effect on academic achievement; whereas the education background of the parents, income and cultural capital of the family are as the opposite. The frequency of reading and the relationship between parents and children have no significant influence on academic achievement. Thirdly, the student who goes to cram school or participates in extracurricular activities has a positive influence on his/her academic achievement. However, the student with the part-time job or bad-behavior friends has a negative influence on his/her academic achievement. Therefore, the authorities should encourage parents and their children to participate in cultural activities through offering economic incentives and the tuition subsidies for low-income households continuously.

近年來，創造力教育受到越來越多守門人的關注，包括企業界領袖、學者專家、政策制定者和教育工作者。另外在學術界和教育界，也有 越來越多的人接受「創造力是可以教」的觀念。因此，追求文化和社會適當的教育創新模式來實施創造力教育是非常重要的。 接觸藝術、學習藝術是培養創造力的重要途徑， 但在正式教育體制很難提供機會平等的平台時，相關的教育守門人就必須創造機會解決此一問題。Christensen、Horn與Johnson （2008、2011）也認為傳統的教育創新只是進行永續性的創新，所以他們進而提出破壞性創新的教育模式，以彌補傳統創新教育模式之不足。 本研究的目的是在探討兩個台灣表演藝術教育破壞性創新的個案：紙風車319鄉村兒童藝術工程和台北景文高中之優人神鼓表演藝術班。本研究的研究方法包括文獻分析，深度訪談和觀察。研究結果發現紙風車319鄉村兒童藝術工程的破壞性教育模式提供更多的機會讓偏遠的兒童可以接觸藝術，對他們產生正面的影響。優人神鼓表演藝術班的教育創新模式讓具有藝術興趣和才能的學生開啟創新的學習管道，一方面發展他們的藝術才情，另一方面也可以在正式教育中表現良好。 / In recent years, creativity in education has received increased attention from gatekeepers - the business leaders, scholars, policy-makers, and educators – around the world. There is also growing acceptance in the academic and educational worlds that “creativity can be taught.” Thus it is now crucial to pursue culturally and socially appropriate models for implementing creativity education. Encountering and studying the arts is an important approach to developing creativity. However, when traditional formal education systems are unable to provide an equal platform for encountering the arts, relevant gatekeepers must come up with new solutions. Christensen, Johnson, & Horn (2008; 2011) write that traditionally, educational innovation has relied on sustaining innovation, which they hold is insufficient for new educational demands today. They propose instead a model of disruptive innovation for education, which has greater potential impact on the education system, to help close the gap between educational ideals and practice. Leadbeater and Wong (2010) further categorize innovations in either formal or informal educational settings. This study examines two cases of disruptive innovation in performing arts education from Taiwan: Paper Windmill Theatre’s First Mile, Kid’s Smile 319 Townships Art Project program and the U-Theatre Performing Arts Class at Taipei Jingwen High School. The research methods employed include document analysis, in-depth interviews, and observations. The research findings conclude that the 319 Project's disruptive innovation model for informal education provided children in remote locations with opportunities to encounter the arts, making a positive impact on their lives. The disruptive innovation model for formal education used by the U-Theatre Performing Arts Class gave students with interests and potential in performing arts a channel for their abilities, both helping them develop their artistic interests and talents and enter university.

本研究使用「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」第二波（2003）國三與第三波（2005）高二的CP追蹤數據，採用反事實模型框架下的傾向分數配對法估計單一性別環境對臺灣高中女生選組行爲（自然組／社會組）的因果效應。使用學生進入高中前的國三資料，本研究在學生因素，家庭因素和學校、班級因素三個方面充分平衡處置組（進入女校）和控制組（進入男女合校）的樣本，使配對樣本之間除了進入女校或進入男女合校之外，在以上三個方面儘可能相等，嘗試克服觀察性數據因選擇性偏誤問題對因果效應的估計帶來的阻礙。結果顯示，在進行傾向分數配對後，處置組和控制組之間達到了很好的平衡，進入女校的女生與進入男女合班的男女合校中的女生相比，女校顯著地促進了高中女生選自然組的機率，然而該效應在數學成績水平不同的女生中存在異質性，女校顯著地促進了數學成績處於高水平的女生的選擇自然組的行爲。作爲教育分流的重要組成部分，臺灣高中生選組行爲的性別隔離長期存在，選組行爲與學生未來大學科系選擇和職業選擇關係密切，自然組中低比例的女生組成顯現出隱藏的教育機會不平等。該現象長期存在的背後因素，除了學生個人因素和學生家庭背景因素帶來的影響，本研究關注學校這一角色對高中女生選組行爲的影響。 / Based on the Taiwan Educational Panel Survey’s core panel data from wave 2 (junior high school/9th grade) and wave 3 (high school/11th grade), researcher applies the propensity score analysis in counterfactual framework to study the causal effect of single-sex schooling on high school girls’ curriculum tracking (science track or humanity track) selection. Observational data always be the obstacles of making the causal analysis because it's lacking random assignment and being under threat of selection bias and unobserved variables. Using the pretreatment variables from students in 9th grade, students in the treatment group were matched with those in control groups by the individual factors, family factors and school, classroom environment factors. After matching, students come from different groups are supposed to be relatively equivalent on all the matching variables except for attending single-sex school or not. The researcher can make suitable comparison and prediction between well-matched samples. The result shows that more girls in single-sex high schools tend to choose science track. Effect of single-sex schooling is not the same among girls with different level of math scores. It benefits girls with top math performance significantly. As an important part of the educational tracking system, alternative curriculum tracking selection in Taiwan high school is worth noteworthy. The long lasting gender segregation is closely associated with students college major as well as occupation selection and it reveals the hidden educational inequality between gender. Other than focusing on the individual and family background effect on high school girls’ curriculum tracking selection, this study highlights the school effect on it.