Radical feminism is often associated with the 1970s and 1980s in the United States. Although powerful in its goals of solidarity and coalitions, the movement is often criticized for its lack of attention to intersecting systems of power. However, several contemporary feminist spoken word poets are reconceptualizing radical feminism in their political projects, using the theories and activist strategies while paying attention to race, class, and sexuality. This piece traces some of the history and literature of radical feminism, Woman of Color feminism, contemporary Islamic feminism, and spoken word poetry. Using these frameworks, I close-read three poems: "Womyn Before" by Alix Olson, "The Herstory of My Hips" by C.C. Carter, and "99 cent lipstick" by Suheir Hammad to discuss the manner in which each uses coalitions. Olson's poem provides an analysis of the performative and textual aspects of the poem as a way to envision an activist project grounded in old social movements. Carter's poem connects history and archives, using a Woman of Color framework, and through Hammad, the structural critiques of an unjust system that disadvantages minority youth are seen through lenses of Women of Color and Islamic feminism. While these poets gain some knowledge from radical feminism, they interpret it in their poetry in ways that address the intersections of identity. / text

This dissertation consists of three essays investigating questions of politics and policy. The first essay proposes an index that assigns probabilities to all majority coalitions. This index takes as inputs the seat shares and policy positions of the parties represented in parliament. In addition to providing coalition probabilities, it has some desirable properties lacking from the commonly used concept of the minimum-connected winning coalition. In an empirical test, the proposed index slightly outperforms the predictions generated by this standard concept. Furthermore, the probabilities generated by the index are shown to be empirically meaningful. The second essay proposes a model of voter decision-making in proportional representation systems: ultra-rational strategic voters construct expectations of coalitions and policy outcomes based on expected seat distributions and attributed policy positions and vote to maximize their expected utility. The predictions of the model are examined using data from the Netherlands and successfully predict the voting behavior of significant numbers of voters. Nevertheless, other factors matter more than the strategic prediction. Three main take-aways follow: (1) At least to some extent, voters seem to take complex coalition considerations into account. (2) There is a need for large-scale qualitative studies about voter decision-making in proportional representation systems. (3) Narrowly defined strategic voting might matter less in proportional representation systems than in plurality systems. The third essay presents new data on effective corporate income tax rates in 85 countries in 2004. The data come from a survey, conducted jointly with the World Bank’s Doing Business unit and PricewaterhouseCoopers, of all taxes imposed on "the same" standardized mid-size domestic firm. In a cross-section of countries, the estimates of the effective corporate tax rate have a large adverse impact on aggregate investment, FDI, and entrepreneurial activity. Corporate tax rates are correlated with investment in manufacturing but not services, as well as with the size of the informal economy. The results are robust to the inclusion of many controls.

A case study of the first 35 years, 1945 to 1980, of the Swedish nuclear institution. The purpose is to discover which actors that have shaped the Swedish nuclear institution. By using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework I have analyzed these 35 years in three separate parts. Historical institutionalism puts emphasis on the creation of an institution, and so have I. The creation phase goes from 1945 to 1972. The following two parts are critical junctures that spans the years 1973-1978 and 1978-1980. The first critical juncture deals with the Centre Party's reversal in their opinion on nuclear power, the 1976 election and the outcome of that election. The third juncture starts with the Harrisburg accident and ends after the 1980 referendum. Using the advocacy coalition framework to analyze the actions or actors and coalitions during these three phases, I have come to the conclusion that the industry actors, those that have built the reactors, have been the most successful in pushing their coalition's agendas, over the years. Their influence was considerable during the years of institutional creation, while the coalitions that opposed nuclear power were quite weak during this time frame, which is consistent with historical institutionalism's focus on the creation, and path dependence.

Through fifty-three in-depth interviews with activists, community members, immigrants, students, and allies, this dissertation research explores the Austin Immigrant Rights Coalition (AIRC), a nonprofit immigrant rights organization in Austin, Texas that formed as a response to the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act (H.R. 4437) in the spring of 2006. Three layers of questions guide this research: (1) How did AIRC emerge from the established organizations and activist networks in Austin, Texas? (2) What did AIRC do after the 2006 marches and what is its relationship with organizations in Austin? (3) What are the different ways AIRC has attempted to mobilize Latino(a) and pro-immigrant activism? My dissertation demonstrates that the 2006 mobilizations in Austin, Texas were part of a concerted effort by non-profit organizations, grassroots groups, activists, allies, and college and high school students. Amongst these many active participants, Latinas took a lead. The prominence of the work of similar coalitions throughout the U.S. during La Primavera Latina of 2006 and the lack of prominent male leadership suggests that across the nation, as in Austin, a new type of organizational lead is emerging in the Immigrant Rights Movement (Ramírez Perales-Ramos, Arellano 2010). The 2006 mobilizations reveal a different type of leadership, not an absence of one. In Austin, Latinas took on various leadership roles to move the AIRC forward during and beyond the 2006 marches. This dissertation explores the significance of new leadership, a process approach to leadership which I term “doing leadership.” The four processes of doing leadership embody shared leadership, leadership that serves the community, leadership that leads by obeying, and leadership unfolds behind the scenes. / text

This dissertation consists of three interrelated essays examining the role of crisis events in Swedish nuclear energy policymaking. The study takes stock of the idea of ‘crisis exceptionalism’ raised in the literature, which postulates that crisis events provide openings for major policy change. In an effort to explain crisis-induced outcomes in Swedish nuclear energy policy, each essay explores and develops theoretical assumptions derived from the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The introduction discusses the ACF and other theoretical perspectives accentuating the role of crisis in policymaking and identifies three explanations for crisis-induced policy outcomes: minority coalition mobilization, learning, and strategic action. Essay I analyzes the nature and development of the Swedish nuclear energy subsystem. The results contradict the ACF assumption that corporatist systems nurture narrow subsystems and small advocacy coalitions, but corroborate the assumption that advocacy coalitions remain stable over time. While this analysis identifies temporary openings in policymaking venues and in the advocacy coalition structure, it is argued that these developments did not affect crisis policymaking. Essay II seeks to explain the decision to initiate a referendum on nuclear power following the 1979 Three Mile Island accident. Internal government documents and other historical records indicate that strategic considerations superseded learning as the primary explanation in this case. Essay III conducts an in-depth examination of Swedish policymaking in the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl accident in an effort to explain the government’s decision not to accelerate the nuclear power phaseout. Recently disclosed government documents show that minority coalition mobilization was insufficient to explain this decision. In this case, rational learning and strategic action provided a better explanation. The main theoretical contribution derived from the three essays is to posit the intensity and breadth of political conflict, strategic action, and analogical reasoning as key factors affecting the propensity for crisis-induced policy change.

<p>How can we explain variation in support for radical right parties over time and across post-communist democracies? This project suggests that support for radical right parties is driven by the politics of accommodation, and is aimed at counteracting the political inroads, cultural concessions and economic gains of politically organized minorities. It differs from other studies of extremist politics in three primary respects: (1) Unlike current approaches that focus on competition between the extreme and mainstream parties, I emphasize dynamics between the radical right party and non- proximate parties that promote minority rights. (2) Several approaches argue that xenophobia drives support for the radical right, whereas I show that xenophobia is not a distinct feature of the radical right party support base; what differentiates radical right voters from other voters is opposition to governmental transfers towards politically organized minorities. (3) I endogenize issue salience and identify coalition politics - i.e., coalitions of mainstream parties and parties supporting minority protection - as a key mechanism that increases the salience of identity issues in political competition, and benefits radical right parties. The project tests these propositions empirically, and finds supportive evidence using two unique micro-level surveys and an original party-election-level data set covering all post-communist democracies.</p> / Dissertation

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references.

Universidade Federal Fluminense / Esta tese abordou como temas centrais a capacidade de extração tributária e os conflitos distributivos inerentes ao efetivo exercício da coleta de tributos pelo Estado. Nosso objetivo foi analisar os processos por trás das disputas em torno da tributação no Novo Desenvolvimentismo no Brasil (governos Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, 2003-2010) e na Argentina (governos Néstor Kirchner, 2003-2007, e Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, 2007-2011), identificando os legados das trajetórias institucionais prévias sobre a formulação de suas agendas tributárias, bem como as estratégias empreendidas pelas coalizões governantes e opositoras para a promoção de mudanças nas instituições tributária. Para tanto, focalizamos o estudo dos conflitos em torno da CPMF, no Brasil, e das retenções às exportações, na Argentina. Sustentamos que a formação de coalizões desenvolvimentistas explica a formatação de consensos em torno do fortalecimento da capacidade de extração tributária e, por conseguinte, da capacidade de investir e de efetuar gastos sociais. As diferenças observadas nas capacidades extrativas no Brasil e na Argentina se explicam, fundamentalmente, pela construção de um duradouro consenso em torno do desenvolvimentismo, no Brasil, em contraste com a trajetória de marcada por disputas em torno das estratégias de desenvolvimento na Argentina. Ademais, a formação de coalizões de sustentação a determinadas agendas tributárias deve ser entendida no marco das disputas em torno da distribuição dos custos e dos benefícios decorrentes dessas políticas. Por isso, fez-se necessário analisar a articulação das elites econômicas dos dois países na defesa dos seus interesses: embora suas elites empresariais (industriais ou agropecuárias) apresentassem dificuldades históricas na articulação de ação coletiva em favor de agendas positivas, elas foram capazes de articularem suas ações em torno de interesses negativos, objetivando obstaculizar políticas tributárias que fossem de encontro aos seus interesses. / This thesis addressed as central themes state tax capacity and distributive conflicts inherent to the effective tax collection. We aimed at analyzing the processes behind disputes over taxation in the New Developmentist phase in Brazil (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva government, 2003-2010) and Argentina (Néstor Kirchner, 2003-2007, and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner administrations, 2007-2011), identifying the impacts from previous institutional path legacies on the definition of their tax agendas, as well as the strategies adopted by ruling and opposing coalitions to promote changes in tax institutions. We focused our analysis on the conflicts around CPMF, in Brazil, and retenciones on exports, in Argentina. We argued that the emergence of developmentalist coalitions explains the construction of consensus around strengthening state capacity to raise taxes and thus the capacity to invest and promote social expenditures. The observed differences in tax capacity in Brazil and Argentina are explained, fundamentally, by the maintenance of a long-term consensus around developmentalism in Brazil, in contrast to a trajectory characterized by disputes around development strategies in Argentina. Furthermore, the building of coalitions that support particular tax agendas must be understood in the context of disputes around the distribution of costs and benefits associated to these policies. Therefore, we analyzed both countries economic elites articulation in the defense of their interests: even though Brazilian and Argentine business elites (industrial or agricultural) present historical difficulties in promoting collective action for positive agendas, they are capable of organizing their actions around negative interests, aiming to hinder tax policies that were against their interests.

The topic of this thesis is the regional elections 2012 on example of South Bohemia region. In the theoretical part were described the regional administrative bodies and principles of regional elections. The practical part dealt with the analyses of the elections results and application of features of the second-order elections, which were described by Karlheinz Reif and Hermann Schmitt in the 70s years of the last century. In the theses was verified, that the government parties in the second order elections lose. These parties reached a minimum at mid-term of the legislative period and in this period lost a lot of their popularity. The most important aspect of second-order elections is that there is less at stake. This is the reason why the level of participation was lower in this type of elections. The last part of thesis deals with Theory of political coalitions. In the regional elections 2012 was established the minimal winning coalition, which included two left-wing political parties.

Universidade Federal Fluminense / Esta tese abordou como temas centrais a capacidade de extração tributária e os conflitos distributivos inerentes ao efetivo exercício da coleta de tributos pelo Estado. Nosso objetivo foi analisar os processos por trás das disputas em torno da tributação no Novo Desenvolvimentismo no Brasil (governos Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, 2003-2010) e na Argentina (governos Néstor Kirchner, 2003-2007, e Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, 2007-2011), identificando os legados das trajetórias institucionais prévias sobre a formulação de suas agendas tributárias, bem como as estratégias empreendidas pelas coalizões governantes e opositoras para a promoção de mudanças nas instituições tributária. Para tanto, focalizamos o estudo dos conflitos em torno da CPMF, no Brasil, e das retenções às exportações, na Argentina. Sustentamos que a formação de coalizões desenvolvimentistas explica a formatação de consensos em torno do fortalecimento da capacidade de extração tributária e, por conseguinte, da capacidade de investir e de efetuar gastos sociais. As diferenças observadas nas capacidades extrativas no Brasil e na Argentina se explicam, fundamentalmente, pela construção de um duradouro consenso em torno do desenvolvimentismo, no Brasil, em contraste com a trajetória de marcada por disputas em torno das estratégias de desenvolvimento na Argentina. Ademais, a formação de coalizões de sustentação a determinadas agendas tributárias deve ser entendida no marco das disputas em torno da distribuição dos custos e dos benefícios decorrentes dessas políticas. Por isso, fez-se necessário analisar a articulação das elites econômicas dos dois países na defesa dos seus interesses: embora suas elites empresariais (industriais ou agropecuárias) apresentassem dificuldades históricas na articulação de ação coletiva em favor de agendas positivas, elas foram capazes de articularem suas ações em torno de interesses negativos, objetivando obstaculizar políticas tributárias que fossem de encontro aos seus interesses. / This thesis addressed as central themes state tax capacity and distributive conflicts inherent to the effective tax collection. We aimed at analyzing the processes behind disputes over taxation in the New Developmentist phase in Brazil (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva government, 2003-2010) and Argentina (Néstor Kirchner, 2003-2007, and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner administrations, 2007-2011), identifying the impacts from previous institutional path legacies on the definition of their tax agendas, as well as the strategies adopted by ruling and opposing coalitions to promote changes in tax institutions. We focused our analysis on the conflicts around CPMF, in Brazil, and retenciones on exports, in Argentina. We argued that the emergence of developmentalist coalitions explains the construction of consensus around strengthening state capacity to raise taxes and thus the capacity to invest and promote social expenditures. The observed differences in tax capacity in Brazil and Argentina are explained, fundamentally, by the maintenance of a long-term consensus around developmentalism in Brazil, in contrast to a trajectory characterized by disputes around development strategies in Argentina. Furthermore, the building of coalitions that support particular tax agendas must be understood in the context of disputes around the distribution of costs and benefits associated to these policies. Therefore, we analyzed both countries economic elites articulation in the defense of their interests: even though Brazilian and Argentine business elites (industrial or agricultural) present historical difficulties in promoting collective action for positive agendas, they are capable of organizing their actions around negative interests, aiming to hinder tax policies that were against their interests.