The case of the Ultras’ mobilisation and their subsequent demobilisation in the Egyptian revolutionary and post-revolutionary context raises the question of the relationship between the notion of contention and repression, which are questions that are at the centre of debates in the literature. Based on a thorough analysis of the Ultras groups’ collective actions, this dissertation aims at understanding the mobilisation and demobilisation mechanisms at play in revolutionary and post-revolutionary Egypt. Inspired by the literature of contentious collective action and the sociology of sport in various national contexts, we aim at answering the following question: how and in what ways did the Ultras adapt their tools and spaces of mobilisation to avoid state repression? This further prompted the question of the Ultras’ impact on the making of spaces of contention and the general capacity of football fandom to encourage mobilisation. The generalised context of surveillance and control encouraged the development of alternative means and spaces to avoid state repression. Among these alternatives means and spaces, were the stadium, as well as the Ultras’ street art and songs. By investing and (re)possessing these spaces, we show that the Ultras were able to transform a space into an area of conflict and contestation. In other words, these alternative means and spaces can be seen as a way for them to break away from the shackles of social and institutional norms to oppose the general “paradigm of depression, control and normalisation of apathy”. The return to authoritarianism and the coming to power of General Abdel Fattah al Sisi (since June 2013), however, drastically impacted on collective action, as the various groups witnessed the progressive destruction of the spaces of protest and memorialisation that had been developing since the onset of the uprisings. In this regard, we investigate the issue of the demobilisation of the Ultras groups and progressive effacement of spaces of contention. Looking back on the events of the 2011 uprisings and the subsequent 2013 uprisings against president Morsi and regime response, we establish that the general disappearance of protest is linked to the banalisation of violence, which instilled this idea that brutality was commonplace, almost inconsequential because a part of Egyptians’ daily lives. We conclude the dissertation by reflecting on the delocalisation of dissent through the collective act of remembrance. Indeed, the new laws on social media suggest additional efforts from the regime to contain and control political dissent, further contributing to the expansion of the concept of “tentacular state”. In this regard, the acts of remembrance can be understood as a way for the social actors to redefine their repertoires of collective action. Through the digitisation and subsequent dissemination of narratives, photos, videos and sounds, social actors such as the Ultras repossess new spaces of dissent and resistance beyond their physical borders. Ultimately, the power of digitisation and collective acts of remembrance lies in their capacity and potential to stimulate dissent, thus securing political effects. / Doctorat en Sciences politiques et sociales / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Thesis advisor: Julia Chuang / In China’s overheating housing market, citizen grievances over “unfinished housing” (lanweilou) have become widespread. In lanweilou cases, developers presell housing units in high-rise apartments, initiate construction, then abscond without completing construction and renovation of these housing units. This paper documents the rise of a new social media-driven mode of mobilization now popular among homeowners of lanweilou housing. Based on ethnography and interviews with aggrieved homeowners in a southwestern Chinese city, this thesis argues that social media enables homeowners to report their grievances to a wider audience while providing diverse information about their cases for them to refine mobilizational targets. By combining authentic storytelling with self-censorship, homeowners can transform public attention in media channels into state intervention. / Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2021. / Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Departmental Honors. / Discipline: Sociology.

This dissertation explores the potential for community benefits agreements (CBAs) to serve as instruments towards a more democratic approach to situating urban redevelopment projects into residential neighborhoods. To aid my analysis, I utilize the lens of democratic political theory to describe their most intractable shortcomings as well as prescribe reforms that can better enable them to bridge the oftentimes conflicting ends of economic growth and social justice. Moreover, I consider the conditions that are most favorable for residents to maximize their bargaining power against developers and the conditions where developers are least likely to negotiate with the locals. Drawing from a range of sources including interviews, audio recordings, documents, and investigative reporting, I illustrate their common failings by using three case studies of CBAs from major American cities. I find that the most recurring problem facing CBAs is their susceptibility to co- option by powerful political and economic elites who manage to subvert them into devices for private gain. Up to this point, municipalities have been largely reluctant to regulate them, and this lack of regulation has led to agreements being shaped more by informal networks of powerful interests rather than the wants and needs of everyday residents. This informality leading up to an agreement is a major contributing factor to their failings. Thus, in the absence of a structure that actively promotes inclusive and transparent procedures leading up to the forging of an agreement, residents lack the power to meaningfully influence its terms and conditions. This observation leads critics to contend that their vulnerability to elite influence should force us to rethink, and ultimately abandon CBAs as reliable instruments for popular control over the built environment. However, I argue that this conclusion is misguided; given their proliferation across American cities and increasing salience in land-use debates, a more effective alternative is to find institutional designs that curb the excesses of such projects while also making them more responsive to local concerns. If policy makers, activists, and residents are going to continue to look to CBAs to extract concessionary gains from developers, then it is crucial to devise safeguards that effectively minimize opportunities for abuse while also enhancing residential voice in shaping the resulting agreement. / Political Science

No description available.

1900-talets början var en tid med olika arbetsmarknadskonflikter. Det förekom strejker, demonstrationer, kravaller och agitationsmöten. Dessa konflikter utspelade sig i ett samhälle där arbetarrörelsen började organisera sig alltmer i fackföreningar och i arbetarkommuner för att få politiskt inflytande och inflytande över sin arbetssituation. Det gjorde att arbetarrörelsen hamnade i sociala konfrontationer med omgivning, myndigheter och arbetsgivare. Syftet med uppsatsen är att undersöka kopplingen mellan klassformering i ett identitetsperspektiv och framväxten av konfliktrepertoarer i det tidiga 1900-talets fackliga organisationssträvanden. Frågeställningarna utgår från att identifiera konfliktrepertoarer i sociala konfrontationer och vilka av dessa som används för att skapa klassamhörighet i olika sociala, fackliga och politiska sammanhang. För att studera sociala konfrontationer, konfliktrepertoarer och identitetsskapande inom arbetarrörelsen har källmaterial efter fackföreningar vid Bergslagernas järnvägar i Åmål använts. Uppsatsen är ett bidrag till arbetarhistoria och källmaterialet undersöks utifrån teorin i forskningsfältet Contentious Politics Studies. Uppsatsen har även en ikonografisk ansats eftersom källmaterialet innehåller visuella uttryck. I undersökningen har fyra olika sociala konfrontationer identifierats. Dessa är: Agitation och politisk mobilisering 1908 - 1911, Oskar Lundströms avskedande 1909, Lokmannastrejken 1919 och Den stora järnvägsstrejken 1922. Ett antal konfliktrepertoarer identifieras och uppsatsens resultat är att konfliktrepertoarerna utvecklas och förfinas över tid. Kraven blir mer tydligt formulerade och handlingar tillsammans med visuell kultur stärker den politiska identiteten. Konfliktrepertoarer, handlingar och identiteter blir därigenom meningsskapande i klassformeringen. / The beginning of the 20th century was a time of various labor market conflicts. There were strikes, demonstrations, riots and agitation meetings. These conflicts took place in a society where the labor movement began to organize itself in trade unions in order to gain political influence and influence over their work situation. As a result, the labor movement ended up in confrontations with the environment, authorities and employers. The main purpose of the essay is to investigate the connection between class affiliation in an identity perspective and the emergence of contentious repertoires in the early 20th century trade union organizational efforts. The essay is based on theories of Contentious Politics Studies. The investigated material is archives of trade unions at Bergslagernas railways in Åmål. Four different contentious politics have been identified. These are: 1. Agitation and political mobilization 1908 - 1911, 2. Oskar Lundström's dismissal 1909, 2. The engine driver strike in 1919 and 4. The great railway strike in 1922. The result of the essay is that the contentious repertoires are developed and refined over time. The claim making are more clearly formulated and contentious performances together with visual culture strengthen the political identity. Contentious repertoires, contentious performances and political identities thereby create meaning in class affiliation.

Depending on the political environment, economic, cultural and social factors, the digital era provides new opportunities and constraints for mobilization of social movements.The current research was focused on exploring how protest leaders and activists used and perceived social media as a tool for communication and organization during the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh”; a series of peaceful, anti-governmental protests which led to a shift of governmental power in Armenia. Prior work dedicated to unpacking the relationship between social movements and social media have focused on a few empirical cases. Hence, a case study of a yet underexplored social movement can add to this strand of literature. The methodological approach displayed in this study follows a mixed-method model. Interviews with activists of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” and content analysis of official social media accounts of leaders of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” were expected to provide a diverse perspective on social media tactics during the movement. The results implied that social media were perceived as one of the main contributors to the fulfilment of objectives of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” in multiple ways: social media allowed for fast communication, decentralized organization, testimony of the non-violent nature of the movement, as well as validation of the movement through transparency of action (most importantly, in real-time). There was a strong indication that live video broadcasting function on Facebook was generally perceived as a tool with more capacities for contentious politics. Meanwhile, the results suggest that the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” could be perceived as a continuity of previous social movements, the negative experience gained from which curbed the overall tactics of the movement, rather than a result of immediate grievances. Nonetheless, the role of human emotions, such as fear, hope and will, was at the centre of interpretations of how the activists experienced the movement.

o movimento de lésbicas, gays, bissexuais, travestis e transexuais (LGBT) e o movimento cristão pró-vida e pró-família se engajaram em um confronto político em torno das demandas do primeiro desses movimentos ao Governo Federal. Ao longo desse período – em especial, a partir do primeiro Governo Dilma Rousseff (2011-2014) – os resultados políticos desse confronto variaram, passando a favorecer em maior medida o movimento cristão conservador. Essa variação vai de encontro às expectativas de estudos sobre os impactos de oportunidades políticas sobre os resultados políticos de confrontos, na medida em que, ao longo do período analisado, em primeiro lugar, um mesmo partido se manteve a frente da chefia do Executivo e, em segundo lugar, ativistas LGBT se mantiveram ativos em ministérios e secretarias do Governo Federal. Essa tese tem como principal objetivo explicar as variações nos resultados políticos desse confronto. Para atingir esse objetivo, realizei entrevistas com ativistas desses movimentos, com burocratas ativistas LGBT que atuaram em órgãos do Governo Federal e com assessores ligados à Frente Parlamentar Evangélica (FPE) e à Frente Parlamentar de Defesa da Cidadania LGBT (FPLGBT). Também utilizei dados do Portal da Transparência e de outras fontes oficiais para mapear iniciativas e recursos do Governo Federal transferidos por meio de ações voltadas às demandas do movimento LGBT. Por fim, mobilizei dados do portal da Câmara dos Deputados e do Senado para identificar variações na presença de parlamentares da FPE em coalizões de governo, na sua ocupação de espaços estratégicos no Congresso Nacional e em seu uso de requerimentos de informação e de projetos de decreto legislativo. A partir da análise desses dados, identifiquei os mecanismos de oportunidade e ameaça que conformam o processo político de gerenciamento de coalizões governamentais e que impactaram os resultados políticos desse confronto. Os resultados dessa investigação sugerem que as dinâmicas e os resultados do confronto político entre a FPLGBT e a FPE no Congresso Nacional passaram a favorecer essa última frente a partir do primeiro Governo Dilma. Com suas vitórias nesse confronto, a FPE se consolidou como um jogador importante no processo de gerenciamento de coalizões de governo, algo inesperado para literatura sobre esse tema, que indica que os partidos políticos são os atores capazes de negociar acordos com a chefia do Executivo. Assim, a FPE passou pressionar a chefia do Executivo em direção aos seus interesses e preferências que, por sua vez, passou a intervir sobre sua burocracia de forma a obstaculizar a ação de ativistas LGBT que se engajavam em confrontos políticos na Esplanada dos Ministérios. Dessa forma, apesar de sua penetração em instituições políticas, burocratas ativistas LGBT não puderam manter o nível de produção de resultados políticos positivos para o movimento LGBT. A partir desses resultados, sugiro como principal contribuição dessa tese que, para explicar variações nos resultados políticos de confrontos políticos no Brasil, é necessário compreender como processos de gerenciamento de coalizões governamentais afetam oportunidades e ameaças que facilitam ou obstaculizam a ação de movimentos sociais. / During the first three Partido dos Trabalhadores’ federal administrations, the Brazilian lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders movement (LGBT) and pro-life and pro-family christian movement engaged in an episode of contention around the demands of the first of these movements to the Federal Government. During this period – and particularly since the first Rousseff administration (2011-2014) – the political outcomes of this episode of contention varied in favor of the christian conservative movement. This variation challenges the studies on the impacts of opportunities over the political outcomes of political contention, first, because the same party was chief Executive of the country during this period and, second, because LGBT activists maintained their actions inside federal state secretaries. This dissertation aims at explaining the variations of this political contention’s political outcomes. To achieve this goal, I interviewed those movements' activists, LGBT bureaucrat activists that worked in federal state secretaries, and parliamentary assistants related to the Frente Parlamentar Evangélica (FPE) and to the Frente Parlamentar de Defesa da Cidadania LGBT (FPLGBT). I also mobilized data from official sources to map state initiatives and investments on actions related to LGBT demands. Finally, I used data from the Câmara dos Deputados’ and the Senado’s web pages to identify variations in the number of FPE parliamentarians in government coalitions, in the occupation of strategic spaces in the National Congress by these parliamentarians, and in their use of two legislative instruments, the requerimentos de informação and the projetos de decreto legislativo. Analyzing this data, I identified the mechanisms of opportunity and threat which conform the political process of government coalition management and affected the political outcomes of this episode of contention. The data suggests that the dynamics and outcomes of the political contention between the FPLGBT and the FPE in the National Congress began to favor the last of these parliamentary fronts since the first Rousseff administration. With those victories, the FPE consolidated itself as an important player in the government coalition management political process, something unexpected for the literature on this subject, that suggests that political parties are the actors capable of negotiating agreements with the chief of the Executive. The FPE started to press the chief Executive toward its interests and preferences who, on its turn, stated to intervene over its own bureaucracy, creating obstacles for the actions of LGBT activists that were engaged in contentious politics in state secretaries. Therefore, despite of its penetration in political institutions, LGBT bureaucrat activists could not afford to maintain their level of production of political outcomes for the LGBT movement. From this data, as the main contribution of this dissertation, I suggest that, in order to explain the variation of political outcomes of contentious politics in Brazil, it is necessary to understand how government coalition management processes affect the opportunities and threats which facilitate or hinder the action of social movements.

Esta tese investiga as performances de confronto político desempenhadas pelas associações abolicionistas após a promulgação da lei 3.353, que declarou extinta a escravidão no Brasil. O objetivo é entender o que se passa com um movimento social depois que sua principal reivindicação é atingida. Neste caso, trata-se de investigar se os principais atores do movimento abolicionista, a saber, as associações abolicionistas, continuaram em atividade e o que faziam após a abolição. A via metodológica escolhida para a investigação consistiu na quantificação da informação disponível na própria imprensa abolicionista. A pesquisa consistiu no levantamento e leitura de periódicos abolicionistas da província do Rio de Janeiro, publicados entre 13 de maio de 1888 (data da lei áurea) e 15 de novembro de 1889 (data da proclamação da república). A partir desta leitura dos jornais foi construído um banco de dados, com identificação das associações abolicionistas que permaneceram em atividade mesmo depois de atingida a sua principal demanda, bem como das suas performances políticas. A intenção desta tese é tripla: correlacionar performances encenadas no pós-abolição com as do pré-abolição para verificar se elas preservam o padrão de ativismo construído pelo movimento abolicionista; argumentar que as associações são uma ponte organizacional suspendida no tempo, permitindo a transmissão de padrões de performances de um período a outro, assim promovendo a ligação entre ciclos de ativismos; e por último, analisar as interações de confronto das associações com as instituições políticas, observando as aberturas e fechamentos institucionais a elas. A tese demonstra a continuidade do ativismo abolicionista no pós-abolição, identificando 10 associações, sendo a Confederação Abolicionista a matriz organizacional, atuantes no imediato pós-abolição no Rio de Janeiro num contexto adverso, no qual as instituições políticas se mostraram mais refratarias do que receptivas aos abolicionistas. / This thesis investigates the performances of contentious politics that were carried out by abolitionist associations after the enactment of the 3.353 law, which declared that slavery in Brazil was extinguished. The goal is to understand what happens with a social movement when it accomplished its main claim. In this case, it is about revealing if the main actors of the abolitionist movement the abolitionist associations maintained their activities and what they did after the abolition of slavery. The methodological path chosen for the investigation consists in quantifying the information made available by the abolitionist press itself. The research consisted in reading and mapping abolitionist journals from the province of Rio de Janeiro, published between May, 13th of 1988 (the day the Golden Law Lei Áurea - was signed) and November, 15th (the day of the proclamation of the Republic). From the reading of the journals, we built a database, identifying the abolitionist associations that kept their activities even after achieving their main goal, as well as their political performances. We have three goals: to correlate performances in mis-en-scène in the post-abolition with the ones from the pre-abolition period, in order to see if they maintain the activism standard which was built by the abolitionist movement; to argue that associations are an abeyance organizational bridge in time, allowing the transmission of performance patterns from one period to another, thus promoting the connection between activism cycles; lastly, to analyze the interaction of contention of associations with political institutions, observing the institutional opennes and closures that they were subject to. The thesis shows the continuity of abolitionist activism in the post-abolition period, identifying 10 acting associations after the abolition in Rio de Janeiro. The Abolitionist Confederation was the organizational matrix even in an adverse post-abolition context, in which the political institutions demonstrated being more refractory than receptive to the abolitionists.

Esta tese investiga as performances de confronto político desempenhadas pelas associações abolicionistas após a promulgação da lei 3.353, que declarou extinta a escravidão no Brasil. O objetivo é entender o que se passa com um movimento social depois que sua principal reivindicação é atingida. Neste caso, trata-se de investigar se os principais atores do movimento abolicionista, a saber, as associações abolicionistas, continuaram em atividade e o que faziam após a abolição. A via metodológica escolhida para a investigação consistiu na quantificação da informação disponível na própria imprensa abolicionista. A pesquisa consistiu no levantamento e leitura de periódicos abolicionistas da província do Rio de Janeiro, publicados entre 13 de maio de 1888 (data da lei áurea) e 15 de novembro de 1889 (data da proclamação da república). A partir desta leitura dos jornais foi construído um banco de dados, com identificação das associações abolicionistas que permaneceram em atividade mesmo depois de atingida a sua principal demanda, bem como das suas performances políticas. A intenção desta tese é tripla: correlacionar performances encenadas no pós-abolição com as do pré-abolição para verificar se elas preservam o padrão de ativismo construído pelo movimento abolicionista; argumentar que as associações são uma ponte organizacional suspendida no tempo, permitindo a transmissão de padrões de performances de um período a outro, assim promovendo a ligação entre ciclos de ativismos; e por último, analisar as interações de confronto das associações com as instituições políticas, observando as aberturas e fechamentos institucionais a elas. A tese demonstra a continuidade do ativismo abolicionista no pós-abolição, identificando 10 associações, sendo a Confederação Abolicionista a matriz organizacional, atuantes no imediato pós-abolição no Rio de Janeiro num contexto adverso, no qual as instituições políticas se mostraram mais refratarias do que receptivas aos abolicionistas. / This thesis investigates the performances of contentious politics that were carried out by abolitionist associations after the enactment of the 3.353 law, which declared that slavery in Brazil was extinguished. The goal is to understand what happens with a social movement when it accomplished its main claim. In this case, it is about revealing if the main actors of the abolitionist movement the abolitionist associations maintained their activities and what they did after the abolition of slavery. The methodological path chosen for the investigation consists in quantifying the information made available by the abolitionist press itself. The research consisted in reading and mapping abolitionist journals from the province of Rio de Janeiro, published between May, 13th of 1988 (the day the Golden Law Lei Áurea - was signed) and November, 15th (the day of the proclamation of the Republic). From the reading of the journals, we built a database, identifying the abolitionist associations that kept their activities even after achieving their main goal, as well as their political performances. We have three goals: to correlate performances in mis-en-scène in the post-abolition with the ones from the pre-abolition period, in order to see if they maintain the activism standard which was built by the abolitionist movement; to argue that associations are an abeyance organizational bridge in time, allowing the transmission of performance patterns from one period to another, thus promoting the connection between activism cycles; lastly, to analyze the interaction of contention of associations with political institutions, observing the institutional opennes and closures that they were subject to. The thesis shows the continuity of abolitionist activism in the post-abolition period, identifying 10 acting associations after the abolition in Rio de Janeiro. The Abolitionist Confederation was the organizational matrix even in an adverse post-abolition context, in which the political institutions demonstrated being more refractory than receptive to the abolitionists.

o movimento de lésbicas, gays, bissexuais, travestis e transexuais (LGBT) e o movimento cristão pró-vida e pró-família se engajaram em um confronto político em torno das demandas do primeiro desses movimentos ao Governo Federal. Ao longo desse período – em especial, a partir do primeiro Governo Dilma Rousseff (2011-2014) – os resultados políticos desse confronto variaram, passando a favorecer em maior medida o movimento cristão conservador. Essa variação vai de encontro às expectativas de estudos sobre os impactos de oportunidades políticas sobre os resultados políticos de confrontos, na medida em que, ao longo do período analisado, em primeiro lugar, um mesmo partido se manteve a frente da chefia do Executivo e, em segundo lugar, ativistas LGBT se mantiveram ativos em ministérios e secretarias do Governo Federal. Essa tese tem como principal objetivo explicar as variações nos resultados políticos desse confronto. Para atingir esse objetivo, realizei entrevistas com ativistas desses movimentos, com burocratas ativistas LGBT que atuaram em órgãos do Governo Federal e com assessores ligados à Frente Parlamentar Evangélica (FPE) e à Frente Parlamentar de Defesa da Cidadania LGBT (FPLGBT). Também utilizei dados do Portal da Transparência e de outras fontes oficiais para mapear iniciativas e recursos do Governo Federal transferidos por meio de ações voltadas às demandas do movimento LGBT. Por fim, mobilizei dados do portal da Câmara dos Deputados e do Senado para identificar variações na presença de parlamentares da FPE em coalizões de governo, na sua ocupação de espaços estratégicos no Congresso Nacional e em seu uso de requerimentos de informação e de projetos de decreto legislativo. A partir da análise desses dados, identifiquei os mecanismos de oportunidade e ameaça que conformam o processo político de gerenciamento de coalizões governamentais e que impactaram os resultados políticos desse confronto. Os resultados dessa investigação sugerem que as dinâmicas e os resultados do confronto político entre a FPLGBT e a FPE no Congresso Nacional passaram a favorecer essa última frente a partir do primeiro Governo Dilma. Com suas vitórias nesse confronto, a FPE se consolidou como um jogador importante no processo de gerenciamento de coalizões de governo, algo inesperado para literatura sobre esse tema, que indica que os partidos políticos são os atores capazes de negociar acordos com a chefia do Executivo. Assim, a FPE passou pressionar a chefia do Executivo em direção aos seus interesses e preferências que, por sua vez, passou a intervir sobre sua burocracia de forma a obstaculizar a ação de ativistas LGBT que se engajavam em confrontos políticos na Esplanada dos Ministérios. Dessa forma, apesar de sua penetração em instituições políticas, burocratas ativistas LGBT não puderam manter o nível de produção de resultados políticos positivos para o movimento LGBT. A partir desses resultados, sugiro como principal contribuição dessa tese que, para explicar variações nos resultados políticos de confrontos políticos no Brasil, é necessário compreender como processos de gerenciamento de coalizões governamentais afetam oportunidades e ameaças que facilitam ou obstaculizam a ação de movimentos sociais. / During the first three Partido dos Trabalhadores’ federal administrations, the Brazilian lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders movement (LGBT) and pro-life and pro-family christian movement engaged in an episode of contention around the demands of the first of these movements to the Federal Government. During this period – and particularly since the first Rousseff administration (2011-2014) – the political outcomes of this episode of contention varied in favor of the christian conservative movement. This variation challenges the studies on the impacts of opportunities over the political outcomes of political contention, first, because the same party was chief Executive of the country during this period and, second, because LGBT activists maintained their actions inside federal state secretaries. This dissertation aims at explaining the variations of this political contention’s political outcomes. To achieve this goal, I interviewed those movements' activists, LGBT bureaucrat activists that worked in federal state secretaries, and parliamentary assistants related to the Frente Parlamentar Evangélica (FPE) and to the Frente Parlamentar de Defesa da Cidadania LGBT (FPLGBT). I also mobilized data from official sources to map state initiatives and investments on actions related to LGBT demands. Finally, I used data from the Câmara dos Deputados’ and the Senado’s web pages to identify variations in the number of FPE parliamentarians in government coalitions, in the occupation of strategic spaces in the National Congress by these parliamentarians, and in their use of two legislative instruments, the requerimentos de informação and the projetos de decreto legislativo. Analyzing this data, I identified the mechanisms of opportunity and threat which conform the political process of government coalition management and affected the political outcomes of this episode of contention. The data suggests that the dynamics and outcomes of the political contention between the FPLGBT and the FPE in the National Congress began to favor the last of these parliamentary fronts since the first Rousseff administration. With those victories, the FPE consolidated itself as an important player in the government coalition management political process, something unexpected for the literature on this subject, that suggests that political parties are the actors capable of negotiating agreements with the chief of the Executive. The FPE started to press the chief Executive toward its interests and preferences who, on its turn, stated to intervene over its own bureaucracy, creating obstacles for the actions of LGBT activists that were engaged in contentious politics in state secretaries. Therefore, despite of its penetration in political institutions, LGBT bureaucrat activists could not afford to maintain their level of production of political outcomes for the LGBT movement. From this data, as the main contribution of this dissertation, I suggest that, in order to explain the variation of political outcomes of contentious politics in Brazil, it is necessary to understand how government coalition management processes affect the opportunities and threats which facilitate or hinder the action of social movements.