<p>Due to the apparent global economic conditions, at the end of 2008, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued amendments to IAS 39 <em>Financial instruments: recognition and measurement </em>and IFRS 7 <em>Financial instruments: disclosures</em> in October and November, 2008. The amendments allow banks to reclassify their non-derivative financial instruments in rare circumstances. This thesis investigates whether banks in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) reclassify financial instruments, in their financial statements of 2008 and 2009.</p><p>The result of the study shows that 47% of the sample Nordic banks reclassified financial instruments in 2008 and 12% in 2009. All banks increased their net profit as a result of reclassifying financial instruments in 2008. The return on equity (ROE) increased significantly compared to whether the banks would not had reclassified their financial instruments. Tendencies found among the sample Nordic banks are that larger and less profitable banks used the possibility to reclassify financial instruments to a greater extent. Because none of the banks made losses on their choice to reclassify in 2008, the conclusion is that the opportunity given due to the amendments are mostly used by the banks to enhance the net income and the key ratio ROE. This shows that management decisions are short-term. This also indicates that the amendments may be misused by management to enhance current profit for their own benefit. The thesis also concludes that the departure from fair-value as the valuation method for financial instruments, due to recent massive critic, is unlikely.</p>

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-11T14:02:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Alex Sander Pereira Regis.pdf: 1558751 bytes, checksum: 87bb0f2e05a92c301f304aa753235b32 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-09-27 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / A presente dissertação tem como horizonte temático a reflexão e análise de narrativas sobre a crise econômica mundial deflagrada inicialmente nos EUA em 2008, bem como sua articulação teórico-empírica com a ideia central da pesquisa, qual seja, a de que a ‗crise em questão está intimamente relacionada as implicações da Globalização, no quadro de uma ruptura teórico-epistemológica, cuja principal expressão é a crise generalizada de representações coletivas. Procurou-se no primeiro momento expor e problematizar a noção de Globalização a fim de privilegiar uma compreensão sobre globalização que sirva de pressuposto e soldo teórico para os fins do trabalho. No segundo momento apresento as diversas narrativas sobre a ‗crise , referidas, de um lado, em obras de teóricos ( Harvey, Boaventura, Touraine, Bauman), e de outro, em registros de análises extraídos de um arquivo digital construído a partir da sistematização de dados (artigos, entrevistas, dossiês etc) de três endereços eletrônicos (CartaMaior, IhuOnline e OutrasPalavras). Por fim, busca-se articular os momentos já referidos, tendo em vista operar as conexões de sentido entre a ‗crise econômica mundial , Globalização, Crise de representações coletivas e, portanto, apontar as implicações sociológicas daí oriundas, em outras palavras, no último momento afirmo que a crise evidencia, de um lado, as contradições e turbulências mais agudas de um período de ―ruptura histórico-epistemológica‖, de outro, a redefinição das representações coletivas clássicas através da intensificação de lutas , conflitos e resistências (Indignados, Occupy, Jornada de Junho etc) contra uma globalização totalitária que privilegia o mercado financeiro e, a favor de outras globalizações e formas de produzir e viver que valorizam a vida e suas populações. Conflitos e resistências que a longo e médio prazo determinaram o vir a ser do Estado-Nação e sua soberania; da Democracia e sua legitimidade, da globalização hegemônica face às globalizações contra e alter-hegemônicas. Estamos no interior de um parto histórico!

This study aims to investigate how Sweidish large companies' capital structure is affected by business cycles and which factors affect the capital structure. The impact of the capital structure on companies is described through the two central theories trade-off theory and the pecking order theory. The hypotheses were designed based on the theories and previous studies and tested through multiple regression analysis. The study is based on a quantitative approach because the empirical data is based on numbers. The empirical data is taken from Retriever Business based on the study's sample, which was companies with a turnover of over SEK 500 million, more than 250 employees, active before 2006 and all financial companies were excluded. Based on this selection, 1201 companies emerged from which a cluster sample was made. The sample amounted to 383 companies during the period 2006–2011. This study examines four intervals which are before the financial crisis (2006–2007), during the financial crisis (2008–2009), and after the financial crisis (2010–2011) as well as the total period (2006–2011). In the analysis, a dependent variable (leverage) and three independent variables (size, profitability, and tangibility), and a dummy variable (financial crisis) were used. To carry out the study, a univariate analysis, a bivariate analysis, and a regression analysis were used, the results of which showed that the tangibility and the financial crisis had a positive correlation with the leverage of large companies at a 99 percent significance level. Size and profitability had a negative impact on leverage, however, only profitability demonstrated a statistically significant relationship at the 98 percent level. Based on the result, this study can reject H0b, H0c, and H0d and keep H0a. Based on the results, it’s possible to conclude that the pecking order theory and the trade-off theory explain how large companies finance their operation and how the financial crisis impacted their capital structure. Where the capital structure can be explained based on how profitable a company is and what the asset structure looks like. Where profitable companies have a lower level of leverage, while a company with a high asset structure has a higher level of leverage. The results of this study are in line with previous research. Which is that the financial crisis had an impact on the capital structure where the debt ratio increased during the period of the financial crisis (2008–2009) and then returned to lower levels after the financial crisis (2010–2011). / Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka hur stora bolags kapitalstruktur i Sverige påverkas av konjunkturcykler samt vilka faktorer som påverkar kapitalstrukturen. Genom de två centrala teorierna trade-off och pecking order teorin beskrivs kapitalstrukturens påverkan på företagen. Hypoteserna utformades utifrån teorierna samt tidigare studier och testades genom en multipel regressionsanalys. Studien utgick ifrån en kvantitativ ansats eftersom studien baserades på siffror samt att tidigare studier applicerad en kvantitativ ansats. Empirin hämtades från Retriever Business utifrån studiens urval, vilket var företag med en omsättning över 500 miljoner kr, fler än 250 anställda, aktiva före 2006 samt att alla finansiella bolag uteslöts. Utifrån detta urval framkom det 1201 företag vilket ett slumpmässigt stickprov gjordes ifrån. Stickprovet uppgick till 383 företag under perioden 2006–2011. Studien undersökte fyra tidsintervall före finanskrisen (2006–2007), under finanskrisen (2008–2009) och efter finanskrisen (2010–2011) samt den totala perioden (2006–2011). I analysen användes en beroende variabel (skuldsättningsgrad) samt tre oberoende variabler (storlek, lönsamhet och tillgångsstruktur) samt en dummyvariabel (krisperioden). För att genomföra studien tillämpades en univariat analys, bivariat analys och regressionsanalys, vars resultat visade att tillgångsstruktur och finanskrisen hade ett positivt samband med skuldsättningen hos stora företag på en 99 procentig signifikansnivå. Storlek och lönsamhet hade en negativ påverkan på skuldsättningen, dock var det endast lönsamhet som påvisade ett statistiskt signifikant samband på 98 signifikansnivå. Utifrån resultatet kunde denna studie förkasta H0b, H0c och H0d samt behålla H0a. Studien kunde även dra slutsatserna att pecking-order teorin samt trade-off teorin förklarar hur stora företag finansierar sin verksamhet samt att finanskrisen hade en påverkan på företagens kapitalstruktur. Studien fann att kapitalstrukturen kan förklaras utifrån hur lönsamt ett företag är samt hur tillgångsstrukturen ser ut. Där lönsamma företag innehar en lägre skuldsättning medan ett företag med en hög tillgångsstruktur innehar en högre skuldsättningsgrad. Resultatet som framkommit i denna studie låg i linje med tidigare forskning, vilket är att finanskrisen hade en påverkan på kapitalstrukturen där skuldsättningsgraden ökade under perioden under finanskrisen (2008–2009) för att sedan återgå till lägre nivåer efter finanskrisen (2010–2011).

Les conséquences des chocs économiques négatifs sur les ménages ont été documentés extensivement, mais on en sait beaucoup moins sur la manière dont ces chocs sont transmis aux individus à travers la médiation du ménage. Le ménage contribue-il à modérer l'effet des chocs négatifs ? Dans quelle mesure le choc économique pèse-t-il dans la négociation familiale ? À partir de données sur la crise économique argentine de 2001, je montre d'abord que les femmes en couple ont une plus grande probabilité de devenir actives si leur mari a fait l'expérience d'un choc de revenu. Ensuite, je montre que le cycle économique importe dans les décisions d'investissement en capital humain. Sur le long terme, les profils de salaire et d'employabilité des hommes argentins sont affectés de manière persistante par les conditions économiques initiales au moment de l'obtention du diplôme. Enfin, je considère la dimension “man-cession” de la crise économique de 2009 en Espagne et montre que la part des ressources du ménage reçues par les femmes pour leur consommation privée augmente avec la diminution de l'écart des taux de chômage hommes-femmes, confortant l'hypothèse que les chocs négatifs modifient le pouvoir de négociation des individus au sein du ménage. / The consequences of adverse aggregate shocks on households have been repeatedly documented, but far less has been said on the way they are passed over to individuals through the mediation of the household. Does the household contribute in mitigating the effects? Or does the economic shock rather invite itself at the family negociating table? Using the Argentine 2001 economic crisis as a natural experiment, I first show that married women are more likely to enter the labor market if their husband experienced a loss in income, giving credit to the insurance mechanism. Then, I show that the business cycle matters for investments in education, and that long run labor outcomes of Argentine men are persistently affected by the initial conditions upon graduation. Finally, I consider the “Mancession” dimension of the Great Recession in Spain and demonstrate that the resource share accruing to wives for own consumption increases together with the decreasing unemployment gap, which comes in support to the bargaining hypothesis.