No / We develop a non-linear Markov error correction approach to examine the general co-integration relation between the H- and A-prices of cross-listed Chinese stock issuers across the period January 1999 to March 2009. We unravel three important dimensions of this relation. These pertain to (i) the long-run expectation of the H- (to A-price) discount; (ii) the level of short-run co-movement in prices; and (iii) the magnitude of error corrections. Findings point to significant improvements in all three areas. Policy and corporate governance change appears to be the principal force driving the efficiency gains. Weakening informational asymmetries underlie much of the change in the markets’ relative pricing. In contrast, sentiment effects strongly underpin the contemporaneous response and error correction adjustments. Finally, the escalating Global Financial Crisis of 2008 appears to have not only bolstered the A- and H-markets’ short-term pricing dynamic but also temporarily increased the long-term H-share discount.

本研究之模型乃採用Hansen於1999年提出之Panel Threshold Model，並針對全球23個不同國家中之23間證交所於1995~2006年間的資料，探討各類影響企業選擇跨國上市之因素，是否會因模型的門檻變數─經濟成長率的變動而對被解釋變數─跨國上市率出現結構改變的影響。實證的結果發現：各變數中唯有市場集中度此一變數具顯著的門檻效果，且在其兩個門檻值的分類中都和跨國上市率呈顯著正相關；這樣的結果除了符合Heiko (2001) 的研究之外，更近一步的我們還發現低於門檻值部分的樣本其對跨國上市率的影響大於高於門檻值部分的樣本。此外，本文的實證結果也指出：對跨國上市率有顯著正相關的因素分別為：本益比、通貨膨脹率及經濟成長率。而對跨國上市率有顯著負相關的因素則為：週轉率、利率和新上市籌資率。 / This paper adopts the Panel Threshold Model suggested by Hansen in 1999 as our main idea to make a study of contributors of cross-listing ratio of stock exchanges. In order to find out whether the explanatory variables will make cross-listing ratio occur structure change, we use GDP growth rate as our threshold variable and take 23 stock exchanges of 23 different countries as research samples. The results are as follows, we found that the only one variable that has threshold effect is the degree of market concentration, and in both regimes it has positive relations to the cross-listing ratio. The result not only supports the research of Heiko (2001), but also points out that the higher regime part has more powerful influence to the cross-listing ratio than the lower regime part. Besides, we still found that variables have positive relations to the cross-listing ratio are PE ratio, inflation rate and GDP growth rate. Furthermore, variables like turnover ratio, interest and capital raised by new shares ratio have negative relations to the cross-listing.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T18:39:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Flavia Caprara Husek.pdf: 756972 bytes, checksum: 9bc7513973650725318dde35556adc2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-12-04 / Corporate Governance has been the subject of a broad complex of articles within last decade, mainly related to the study regarding the appraisal of shares of publicly-held companies after the creation and implementation of all internal and external control mechanisms to comply with the requirements of Corporate Governance. The issue has became especially important after 2000, when the São Paulo Stock Exchange BOVESPA created the listing segments Level I, Level II and New Marked. Nevertheless, the association and connection of the subject Corporate Governance with the cross-listing matter is still very incipient, requiring deeper studies. This research has had as main purpose to broaden the discussions as regards the impact of issuance of shares in stock exchanges of countries with high Corporate Governance levels, in the shares traded by such companies in the São Paulo Stock Exchange, within the period from 2000 to 2011. Assuming the relation of cross-listing with the appraisal of Brazilian companies, an event study has been performed with the scope of verifying the existence of statistically material abnormal returns on the Brazilian shares at the date of issuance of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). Utilyzing a sampling of 16 events of companies issuing shares in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), it has been verified that there is no statistically material positive valuation of the Brazilian shares at the time of ADRs issuance. The results verified ractify, in part, the null hypothesis that the issuance in more criterious markets do not direclty reflect in the Brazilian market, signaling that the internationalization, still considered costfull, is not yet positively evaluated by the marked / A Governança Corporativa tem sido tema de um amplo conjunto de artigos na última década, principalmente com relação ao estudo sobre a valorização das ações das companhias abertas após a criação e implementação dos mecanismos internos e externos de controle, para atender aos requisitos da Governança. O tema se tornou especialmente importante após o ano de 2000, quando a BOVESPA criou os segmentos de listagem Nível I, Nível II e Novo Mercado. Contudo, a associação e correlação do tema Governança Corporativa com o tema dupla listagem (crosslisting) ainda é muito incipiente, demandando estudos mais aprofundados. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo central ampliar as discussões quanto ao impacto das emissões de ações, em bolsas de valores de países com altos níveis de Governança Corporativa, nas ações negociadas por essas empresas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo, no período de 2000 a 2011. Tendo como pressuposto a relação entre a dupla listagem e a valorização das empresas brasileiras, foi realizado um estudo de evento, com intuito de verificar a existência de retornos anormais estatisticamente significantes nas ações brasileiras, na data de emissão da American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). Utilizando uma amostragem de 16 eventos de empresas emissoras de ações na bolsa de Nova Iorque (NYSE), verificou-se que não existe uma reavaliação positiva estatisticamente significativa das ações brasileiras, quando do momento da emissão das ADRs. Os resultados encontrados, em parte, corroboram com hipótese nula de que a emissão em mercados exigentes não reflete diretamente no mercado brasileiro, sinalizando que a internacionalização, considerada ainda extremamente custosa, não é avaliada de forma positiva pelo mercado

In this thesis, we analyze premium relationship of American depositary receipts (ADR) and their underlying shares. Several researchers have previously identified the main variables influencing the construction of ADR premium of cross-listed companies. The aim of this study is to investigate to what extent the main variables affect differently the construction of ADR premium in crisis period. For the purpose of the study, two periods are defined. The period from June 2006 to October 2007 represents the non-crisis period whereas the period from October 2007 to March 2009 represents the crisis period. Our cross-listing sample consists of companies that have level II and level III ADR listed on the NYSE and the NASDAQ over the two periods. The tested variables influencing the premium are the liquidity, the currency exchange rate, the home and US market and the volatility. The liquidity is measured according to two ratios, the Amihud ratio and the turnover ratio. The currency exchange rate is the current exchange rate denominated in US dollar. The home markets are the reference indexes of the home country to which the underlying share of the ADR belong. The S&P 500 Index is used as a proxy for the US market. Finally, the US market volatility is analyzed with the CBOE VIX volatility Index. Multiple and simple OLS regressions are used to analyze the impacts of variables on ADR premium. The T-statistic is chosen to test the explanatory power of variables. The regressions are divided in three main parts. The first one is dedicated to the liquidity variables, then the second one to the home and US market, currency exchange rate and CBOE VIX volatility Index. Finally the last part keeps only the variables with the stronger explanatory power in order to define two equations of the factor influencing mostly the premium. We have found that crisis strongly modifies the relationship between ADR premium and the main variables. In crisis period, the regressions show that liquidity becomes a factor with a greater explanatory power of ADR premium. However the other main variables experience the opposite effect with a much lower T-test in times of crisis. It seems that the currency exchange rate, the home and US market as well as the volatility lose their explanatory power in times of crisis to the benefit of liquidity variables.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the location of buying stocks in a Nordic cross-listed company matters in terms of 1) earning abnormal returns, or 2) gaining in optimizing the amount spent by buying the specific stock cheap. Nowadays, markets are becoming more integrated and if we believe in the efficient market hypothesis, prices of the same class of stocks paying the same dividend annually, of an MNC must be the same irrespective of the stock exchange it is listed upon. Though efficient market hypothesis exists in theory, market imperfection is a reality. All the Nordic (Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian, Danish and Icelandic) firms listed on foreign stock exchanges in addition to their home market have been included in the sample. In fact, this sample represents 100% of the population. The daily prices of cross-listed stocks have been analyzed and conclusions have been drawn based on the mean returns and mean prices along with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test statistics. The data have been analyzed over the last ten years capturing the recent economic cycle. The whole period has also been divided into three sub-periods to establish comparisons with the whole period. This paper reports that even though returns on cross-listed stocks are statistically same over all periods, prices of the stocks vary according to the location of listing. That is, investors can buy from a stock exchange where the specific stock is underpriced thereby decreasing the amount invested in absolute term and optimizing the amount spent if not the return. The returns and prices have analyzed using the local currency of the MNC’s country of origin and Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). No considerable differences on the returns or pattern of price movements have been observed while using two currencies.

The study aims to detect the influence of the initial cross-listing of Taiwanese enterprises on the variety of the stock price of the listing company and its rival firms. However, the limitations from the Taiwanese authorities on the local company¡¦s direct listing in the oversea market are not a few. Accordingly, I employ GDR instead of direct international listing to delve the phenomenon of information content and intra-industry transfer derived from a company¡¦s initial GDR offering. Recent studies focusing on the same issue rarely inspect the situation of Taiwanese industries. Thus, the research intends to excavate the effect and the aftermath of a Taiwanese firm¡¦s initial GDR offering on its local market price as well as on the one of its rival company that concurrently does not have GDR offering. To delineate the complication of the issue, the study develop three trajectories mainly based on various approaches, including reference review, event study method, and multi-regression analysis. The first aspect attends to the research result of event study method and multi-regression analysis that exposes the stock price of the GDR offering company has abnormally positive rise accompanying with the announcement of its GDR offerings, particularly in the period before the announcement. That reflects the investors regard the GDR offering as a positive news for a company while the situation turns out to be the opposite for the rival firms. The research also finds that industry differences might dominate the consequence of the GDR offering. Hence, the exemplary simples are divided into the ¡§hi-tech¡¨ industry group and the ¡§non hi-tech¡¨ industry group. Based on the reference review of Melvin and Valero-Tonone¡]2005¡^ and the outcome of the multi-regression analysis, the influence of GDR offering on both industry group will be carefully scrutinized. In addition, the study places another attention on the discussion of intra-industry transferring and the contagion effect of the GDR offering on the offering company and its rival firm. Although Taiwanese enterprises offer GDR mainly in four main trade locations from London, Luxembourg, New York, and NASDAQ, the study exposes that the trade location has less influence on a company¡¦s and its rival firm¡¦s SCAR variation. That implies that Taiwanese investors might recognize the fact of a company¡¦s GDR offering in the oversea market, whereas, they seldom be aware of the trivial differentiation of the disparate trade location. In conclusion, the GDR offering of Taiwanese enterprises indeed encompasses information content that might motivate the alteration of the stock price in Taiwan stock market. Besides, the action of GDR offering supplies intra-industry information transferring effect. Even though the strategy of offering GDR of a Taiwanese company does not rely on consulting the action of its rival firms, in reality and according to the application of game theory, the implementing efficiency of a company¡¦s strategies might probably be impinged by its opponents¡¦ behavior. In other words, while a company offers GDR, its rival firms should propose expedients to reduce the damage that might be caused by the issue information.

xii, 84 p. : ill. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. / In this dissertation, I investigate how cross-country differences in regulatory environments affect the value and distribution of gains in cross-border acquisitions. I focus on how pre-acquisition strategies to reduce the valuation discount arising from weak regulatory environments affect the value and distribution of gains between acquiring and target firms. The two specific strategies I examine are cross-listing and voluntarily adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). I compare the value and distribution of synergy gains for target firms from weak regulatory environments that have cross-listed or adopted IFRS (i.e., "strategic firms") to (1) target firms in similar countries that have not done so (i.e., "non-strategic firms") and (2) target firms in strong regulatory environment countries. For the first group, I expect lower total synergy gains and merger premia in acquisitions involving strategic target firms. However, I expect higher total valuation gains (i.e., the merger premium plus the increase in value from the strategy) for strategic firms. For the second comparison group, I expect higher total synergy gains and merger premia in acquisitions involving strategic firms relative to firms from strong regulatory environments. I test my predictions on a sample of cross-border acquisitions completed in 26 countries between 1995-2007. In acquisitions involving target firms from weak regulatory environments, I find no evidence that either the total synergy gain or merger premium are smaller for strategic firms. In fact, I find some evidence that the total synergy gains are higher for strategic firms relative to non-strategic firms. I find some evidence of higher total valuation gains for cross-listed firms, consistent with my hypothesis. For the second comparison group, I find no evidence that either the total synergy gain or merger premium are higher for strategic firms. By examining cross-border acquisitions, my research provides evidence on an increasingly important and economically significant type of foreign direct investment. I relate literature investigating the determinants and distribution of merger synergies to literature analyzing methods to eliminate cross-country valuation discounts. Therefore, my research makes an important contribution by providing insights beyond identifying which party captures synergy gains in cross-border acquisitions. / Committee in charge: David Guenther, Chairperson, Accounting; Steven Matsunaga, Member, Accounting; Linda Krull, Member, Accounting; Bruce Blonigen, Outside Member, Economics

This dissertation comprises two essays; the first of which investigates sovereign credit risk interdependencies, while the second examines the reaction of corporate credit risk to sovereign credit risk events. The first essay titled, Characterizing Sovereign Credit Risk Interdependencies: Evidence from the Credit Default Swap Market, investigates the relationships that exist among disparate sovereign credit default swaps (CDS) and the implications on sovereign creditworthiness. We exploit emerging market sovereign CDS spreads to examine the reaction of sovereign credit risk to changes in country-specific and global financial factors. Utilizing aVAR model fitted with DCC GARCH, we find that comovements of spreads generally exhibit significant time-varying correlations, suggesting that spreads are commonly affected by global financial factors. We construct 19 country-specific commodity price indexes to instrument for country terms of trade, obtaining significant results. Our commodity price indexes account for significant variation in CDS spreads, controlling for global financial factors. In addition, sovereign spreads are found to be related to U.S. stock market returns and the VIX volatility risk premium global factors. Notwithstanding, our results suggest that terms of trade and commodity prices have a statistically and economically significant effect on the sovereign credit risk of emerging economies. Our results apply broadly to investors, financial institutions and policy makers motivated to utilize profitable factors in global portfolios. The second essay is titled, Differential Stock Market Returns and Corporate Credit Risk of Listed Firms. This essay explores the information transfer effect of shocks to sovereign credit risk as captured in the CDS and stock market returns of cross-listed and local stock exchange listed firms. Based on changes in sovereign credit ratings and outlooks, we find that widening CDS spreads of firms imply that negative credit events dominate, whereas tightening spreads indicate positive events. Grouping firms into companies with cross-listings and those without, we compare the spillover effects and find strong evidence of contagion across equity and CDS markets in both company groupings. Our findings suggest that the sensitivity of corporate CDS prices to sovereign credit events is significantly larger for non-cross-listed firms. Possible reasons for this finding could in fact be due to cross-listed firms’ better access to external capital and less degree of asymmetric information, relative to non-cross-listed peers with lower level of investor recognition. Our results provide new evidence relevant to investors and financial institutions in determining sovereign credit risk germane to corporate financial risk, for the construction of debt and equity portfolios, and hedging considerations in today’s dynamic environment.

A dupla listagem é uma estratégia que supostamente pode minimizar os efeitos de uma crise financeira internacional sobre as empresas. Este estudo buscou analisar se esta suposição é válida para companhias brasileiras, no contexto da crise de 2008. O problema de pesquisa que direcionou este estudo foi: A dupla listagem internacional fez com que os impactos da crise financeira de 2008 sobre determinados indicadores das empresas fossem compatíveis com os previstos na literatura e fossem diferentes daqueles sofridos pelas empresas domésticas? O objetivo foi analisar se a dupla listagem pode minimizar os efeitos gerados pela crise financeira de 2008 sobre determinados indicadores associados às empresas listadas. Os efeitos da crise de 2008 foram também comparados com os sofridos pelos papéis de empresas domésticas, sem dupla listagem. Os indicadores analisados foram: liquidez, volume, risco, retorno, custo de capital, alavancagem financeira, valor da empresa e concorrência. O teste de hipóteses foi utilizado para verificar se houve impacto significativo nas variáveis das empresas antes e após a crise financeira. Foram utilizadas para a amostra 37 empresas duplamente listadas (EDL) e 37 empresas domésticas (ED). Os resultados obtidos com o estudo sugerem que, durante uma crise financeira internacional, a maioria dos indicadores das EDL apresenta diferença significativa quando comparados os períodos pré e pós-crise. Os resultados das empresas domésticas foram semelhantes. Estes resultados estão em consonância com os apresentados nos estudos de Bailey, Chan e Chung (2000), Huang e Stoll (2001), Bin, Blenman e Chen (2004), mas contradizem os resultados de Huang e Stoll (2001). Em relação às diferenças entre os dois grupos de empresas Chandar, Patro e Yezegel (2009) afirmam que empresas com dupla listagem ficaram mais protegidas no período da crise; porém, Chira e Marciniak (2014) comprovaram que por serem duplamente listadas as empresas ficaram mais expostas durante as crises financeiras. As duas conclusões principais do estudo são que a crise afetou de forma semelhante os dois grupos de empresas e que, portanto, a dupla listagem não minimizou seus efeitos / The cross-listing is a strategy that supposedly can minimize the effects of an international financial crisis on businesses. This study sought to analyze if this supposition is valid for Brazilian companies, in the context of the crisis of 2008. The research problem that directed this study was: The international cross-listing has meant that the impact of the financial crisis of 2008 on certain indicators of the companies were compatible with the expected in the literature and were different from those experienced by domestic firms? The objective was to analyze if the cross-listing can minimize the effects generated by the 2008 financial crisis on certain indicators associated with listed companies. The effects of the 2008 crisis were also compared with those suffered by the papers of domestic companies, without cross-listing. The indicators analyzed were: liquidity, scale, risk and return, cost of capital, financial leverage, firm\'s value and competitors. The hypothesis testing was used to verify if there was significant impact on the variables of enterprises before and after the financial crisis. The hypothesis testing was used to verify if there was significant impact on the variables of enterprises before and after the financial crisis. They were used for the sample 37 cross-listed firms (CLF) and 37 domestic firms (DF). The results of the study suggest that, during an international financial crisis, most of the indicators of the CLF presents significant difference when compared to the periods before and after the crisis. The results of domestic companies were similar. These results are consistent with those presented in studies by Bailey, Chan and Chung (2000), Huang and Stoll (2001), Bin, Blenman and Chen (2004), but contradict the results by Huang and Stoll (2001). Regarding the differences between the two groups of companies Chandar, Patro and Yezegel (2009) state that companies with cross-listing were more protected in times of crisis; however, Chira and Marciniak (2014) confirmed that cross-listed companies were more exposed during the financial crisis. The two principal conclusions of the study are that the crisis affected in a similar manner both groups of companies and, therefore, the cross-listing did not minimize their effects

O objetivo desse trabalho é analisar os efeitos do anúncio da dupla-listagem sobre o comportamento das ações no mercado doméstico das empresas que promoveram a listagem de ADRs. Os aspectos do comportamento analisados são os retornos anormais, os padrões de liquidez e volatilidade de preços. Foram analisados 22 programas de ADRs. Para cada uma das características analisadas foi utilizada uma diferente técnica empírica. A análise dos retornos anormais foi realizada através de um estudo de eventos para 5 diferentes janelas de estudos. A segunda técnica empírica utiliza-se do Índice de Negociabilidade, uma métrica desenvolvida pela Economática envolvendo o número de negócios diários e o volume diário transacionado da ação para medir potenciais alterações na liquidez das ações e, por fim, a terceira técnica utilizada utiliza a variância dos retornos como medida relevante de alteração de volatilidade dos mesmos. Embora com limitações, o estudo apresentou resultados em linha com parte da literatura de referência, demonstrando, excetuando-se pela janela de 5 dias pré e pós evento, que não é possível afirmar que os retornos das ações estudadas após o anúncio da emissão das ADRs são diferentes dos retornos apresentados pelas ações antes do anúncio. Com relação à análise de impacto sobre a liquidez das ações (INM 50d), foi possível rejeitar a hipótese de que o programa não causa impacto na liquidez com um nível de significância de 10% após comparar a liquidez das ações das empresas que emitiram ADRs com a liquidez das ações das empresas que compunham as carteiras dos grupos de controle. Finalmente, ao estudar a volatilidade das ações, foi possível observar que, para os testes-F realizados, das 22 ações testadas, 11 apresentaram resultados que permitem rejeitar a hipótese nula e, portanto, inferir que, para essas companhias, a variância dos retornos durante o período de 50 dias pós-evento foi diferente da variância dos retornos durante o período de 50 dias pré-evento dentro de um nível de significância de 5%. Para as outras 11 empresas testadas, não foi possível rejeitar a hipótese nula e, portanto, não foi possível concluir, para essas empresas, que o evento do anúncio da emissão de ADRs exerceu qualquer influência sobre a volatilidade dos retornos das ações subjacentes. Essa dissertação contribui para o entendimento mais aprofundado das consequências da emissão de ADRs. Tal processo, caro e demandante, expõe as companhias a diferentes níveis de regulação e exige um nível mais elevado de governança e, portanto, deve ser bem entendido por gestores, bancos e consultores. / The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of the cross-listing announcement on the behavior of the shares of Brazilian companies that enroll in ADR programs. The analyzed aspects of the domestic shares’ behavior are the abnormal returns, the liquidity levels and the volatility of the returns measured by their variance. 22 ADR programs were analyzed. For each of the characteristic studied, a different empirical technique was utilized. The abnormal returns analysis was conducted through an event study for 5 different study windows. The second empirical technique rely on the “Indice de Negociabilidade”, a metric developed by Economatica which involves the number of daily trades of the market and of the shares to measure potential changes in the liquidity levels of the shares. Finally, the third method used analyzes the variance of the returns of the domestic shares as relevant measure of volatility of returns. Although with limitations, the study presented results aligned with part of the reference studies and bibliography, demonstrating, except for the window of 5 days pre and post event, that it is not possible to assert that the returns of the shares analyzed after the announcement of the issuance of the ADRs are different from the returns presented by the shares before the announcement. With regard to the analysis of the impact on shares’ liquidity (INM 50d), it was possible to reject the hypothesis that the program does not impact liquidity with a significance level of 10% after comparing the liquidity of the shares of the companies that issued ADRs with the liquidity companies’ shares that composed the portfolios of the control groups. Finally, in studying volatility of the shares, it was possible to observe that for the F-tests performed, of the 22 shares tested, 11 presented results that allow the rejection of the null hypothesis and, therefore, infer that for these companies, the variance of returns during the 50-day period postevent was different from the variance of returns over the 50-day period previous to the event within a significance level of 5%. For the 11 other companies tested, it was not possible to reject the null hypothesis and therefore it was not possible to conclude, for these companies, that the event of the announcement of the issuance of ADRs had any influence on the volatility of the returns of the underlying shares. This dissertation contributes to a more in-depth understanding of the consequences of issuing ADRs. Such an expensive and demanding process exposes companies to different levels of regulation and requires a higher level of governance and therefore must be well understood by managers, banks and consultants.