No description available.

No description available.

Introduction: The study ‘Mental healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability and a mental disorder’ (MEMENTA) is a cross-sectional epidemiological study carried out in three different regions of Germany. Its main aim is to assess the prevalence of mental disorders in adults with intellectual disability (ID) as well as quality of mental healthcare for this population. Methods and analysis: The target population are persons aged between 18 and 65 years with a mild or moderate ID. The study population will be recruited through service providers. A representative sample is realised by two-stage sampling. First, institutions providing services for people with ID (sheltered workshops) are selected in a stratified cluster sampling, with strata being (1) types of service-providing non-governmental organisations and (2) sizes of their sheltered workshops. Then persons working in selected sheltered workshops are selected by simple random sampling. An estimated number of 600 adults with ID will be included. Information will be obtained from the group leaders in the sheltered workshops, informal carers or staff members in sheltered housing institutions and the person with ID. Besides the main outcome parameter of psychiatric symptomatology and problem behaviour, other outcome parameters such as needs for care, quality of life, caregiver burden, health services utilisation and costs for care are assessed using well-established standardised instruments. If a comorbid mental disorder is diagnosed, quality of mental healthcare will be assessed with open questions to all interview partners and, in addition, problem-focused interviews with a small subgroup. Analyses will be carried out using quantitative and qualitative methods. Ethics and dissemination: Approval of all three local ethics committees was obtained. Research findings will add much needed empirical information in order to improve services provided to this vulnerable group of patients.

One of the aims included in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals is to decrease the number of the world’s population without access to sanitation and water that is safe, by half by the year 2015. The use of water that is not safe for consumption leads to water–related diseases. For the purpose of this study gastro–intestinal disease was redefined as diseases of the gastro–intestinal tract caused by pathogens that spread via contaminated drinking water, poor sanitation and inadequate hygiene. Information obtained regarding the use of gastro–intestinal disease medication, may provide information about the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease in South Africa. The general objective of this study was to determine the prescribing patterns of gastro–intestinal medication in different geographical areas in the private health care sector of South Africa. A retrospective drug utilisation review was conducted on data obtained from a medicine claims database of a pharmacy benefit management company for 2007 and 2008. A pharmacoepidemiological approach was followed in order to determine the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease as well as the use of gastro–intestinal medication in South Africa as well as the different provinces of South Africa. The impact of water quality and sanitation on the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease was also investigated. Gastro–intestinal medication (used in the treatment of gastro–intestinal disease) included the following pharmacological groups according to the MIMS®–classification: antivertigo and anti–emetic agents (group 1.8), antispasmodics (group 12.3), antidiarrhoeals (group 12.7), minerals and electrolytes (group 20.4, selected according to specified NAPPI–codes) and antimicrobials (group 18). Antimicrobials had to be prescribed in combination with one of the specified gastro–intestinal medication groups in order to be classified as a gastro–intestinal medication. In 2007 and 2008 respectively, 428864 and 340921 gastro–intestinal medication items were prescribed. The most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication pharmacological groups in 2007 and 2008 were beta–lactam antimicrobials (with proportion percentages of 22.77% and 20.85% in 2007 and 2008 respectively), antivertigo and anti–emetic agents, antispasmodics, antidiarrhoeals and quinolone antimicrobials. Minerals and electrolytes represented only a small proportion (2.99% and 2.56% in 2007 and 2008 respectively) of the prescribed gastro–intestinal medication in South Africa. In the Free State and Western Cape antivertigo and anti–emetic agents were the most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication items, while in other provinces beta–lactam antimicrobials ranked the highest. In all provinces except the Western Cape and the Northern Cape, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication active ingredient. In the Western Cape loperamide was the most frequently prescribed active ingredient, while ciprofloxacin ranked highest as active ingredient in the Northern Cape in 2008. Based on the prescribing patterns of gastro–intestinal disease medications the treatment of gastro–intestinal disease in this section of the private health care sector of South Africa, does not fully comply with the Standard Treatment Guidelines with regard to the use of antimicrobials and electrolyte replacement therapy. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

One of the aims included in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals is to decrease the number of the world’s population without access to sanitation and water that is safe, by half by the year 2015. The use of water that is not safe for consumption leads to water–related diseases. For the purpose of this study gastro–intestinal disease was redefined as diseases of the gastro–intestinal tract caused by pathogens that spread via contaminated drinking water, poor sanitation and inadequate hygiene. Information obtained regarding the use of gastro–intestinal disease medication, may provide information about the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease in South Africa. The general objective of this study was to determine the prescribing patterns of gastro–intestinal medication in different geographical areas in the private health care sector of South Africa. A retrospective drug utilisation review was conducted on data obtained from a medicine claims database of a pharmacy benefit management company for 2007 and 2008. A pharmacoepidemiological approach was followed in order to determine the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease as well as the use of gastro–intestinal medication in South Africa as well as the different provinces of South Africa. The impact of water quality and sanitation on the prevalence of gastro–intestinal disease was also investigated. Gastro–intestinal medication (used in the treatment of gastro–intestinal disease) included the following pharmacological groups according to the MIMS®–classification: antivertigo and anti–emetic agents (group 1.8), antispasmodics (group 12.3), antidiarrhoeals (group 12.7), minerals and electrolytes (group 20.4, selected according to specified NAPPI–codes) and antimicrobials (group 18). Antimicrobials had to be prescribed in combination with one of the specified gastro–intestinal medication groups in order to be classified as a gastro–intestinal medication. In 2007 and 2008 respectively, 428864 and 340921 gastro–intestinal medication items were prescribed. The most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication pharmacological groups in 2007 and 2008 were beta–lactam antimicrobials (with proportion percentages of 22.77% and 20.85% in 2007 and 2008 respectively), antivertigo and anti–emetic agents, antispasmodics, antidiarrhoeals and quinolone antimicrobials. Minerals and electrolytes represented only a small proportion (2.99% and 2.56% in 2007 and 2008 respectively) of the prescribed gastro–intestinal medication in South Africa. In the Free State and Western Cape antivertigo and anti–emetic agents were the most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication items, while in other provinces beta–lactam antimicrobials ranked the highest. In all provinces except the Western Cape and the Northern Cape, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most frequently prescribed gastro–intestinal medication active ingredient. In the Western Cape loperamide was the most frequently prescribed active ingredient, while ciprofloxacin ranked highest as active ingredient in the Northern Cape in 2008. Based on the prescribing patterns of gastro–intestinal disease medications the treatment of gastro–intestinal disease in this section of the private health care sector of South Africa, does not fully comply with the Standard Treatment Guidelines with regard to the use of antimicrobials and electrolyte replacement therapy. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Hintergrund: Seit Einführung des DSM-III-R wird die Frage, ob Agoraphobie eine Komplikation der Panikstörung ist oder eine eigenständige Diagnose darstellt, und deshalb gleichberechtigt mit der Sozialen und Spezifischen Phobie der Gruppe der Phobien zugeordnet werden sollte, kontrovers diskutiert. Die zwei Positionen in dieser Kontroverse finden ihren Ausdruck im unterschiedlichen Gebrauch hierarchischer Regeln in den gegenwärtig gebräuchlichen Klassifikationssystemen für psychische Störungen, dem Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) und der International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Die empirischen Belege für die Validität solcher hierarchischer Regeln sind allerdings bisher unbefriedigend. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es deshalb, ohne Berücksichtigung der gültigen Hierarchieregeln das natürliche Auftreten von Agoraphobie und Panikstörung zu untersuchen und damit einen Beitrag zum Fortschritt in der oben genannten Kontroverse zu leisten. Methoden: Die Analysen der vorliegenden Arbeit beruhen auf Daten der Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology (EDSP) Studie. Bei der EDSP handelt es sich um eine prospektiv-longitudinale Studie an einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Kohorte von 3021 Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen im Alter von 14 bis 24 Jahren aus München und Umgebung. Die Studienteilnehmer wurden in einem 10-Jahres-Follow-up mit bis zu vier Erhebungszeitpunkten mit der computerisierten Version des Münchener Composite International Diagnostic Interview (DIA-X/M-CIDI) untersucht. Das M-CIDI gestattet es, Panik- und Agoraphobiesyndrome unabhängig von hierarchischen Regeln zu erheben. Risiko- und Vulnerabilitätsfaktoren wurden anhand von Fragebögen erhoben. Die Studie umfasst darüber hinaus zwei familiengenetische Untersuchungen, in deren Rahmen auch die Eltern der Studienprobanden interviewt wurden. Die direkten Elterninterviews wurden durch Informationen der Studienprobanden über ihre Eltern ergänzt. Ergebnisse: Studie 1: Agoraphobia and Panic: Prospective-longitudinal Relations Suggest a Rethinking of Diagnostic Concepts Die Lifetimeinzidenz bis zum Alter von 34 Jahren betrug 9.4% für Panikattacken, 3.4% für Panikstörung (mit und ohne Agoraphobie) und 5.3% für Agoraphobie. Unter den Personen mit Agoraphobie berichteten 51% keine lifetime Panikattacken. Die Inzidenzmuster der drei Syndrome unterschieden sich bezüglich Erstauftrittsalter, Risikoverlauf und Geschlechtseffekten. Zeitlich vorausgehende Panikattacken und Panikstörung waren assoziiert mit einem Risiko für zeitlich nachfolgende Agoraphobie (Panikattacken: OR=26.7, 95% KI=17.2-41.4; Panikstörung: OR=62.5, 95% KI=38.5-101.2). In streng prospektiven Analysen waren Panikattacken/Panikstörung zur Baseline mit Panikattacken/Panikstörung im Follow-up assoziiert und Agoraphobie zur Baseline mit Agoraphobie im Follow-up. Panikattacken, Panikstörung und Agoraphobie zur Baseline hatten niedrige Remissionsraten (0-23%). Alle diagnostischer Gruppen waren bis auf Panikstörung ohne Agoraphobie mit anderen Angststörungen im Follow-up assoziiert. Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie und Agoraphobie mit Panikattacken zur Baseline zeigten höhere Assoziationen mit Komplikationen wie Beeinträchtigung, Komorbidität und Hilfesuchverhalten als Panikstörung ohne Agoraphobie und Agoraphobie ohne Panikattacken. Personen mit Panikattacken/Panikstörung suchten häufiger ärztliche Hilfe als Personen mit Agoraphobie ohne Panikattacken. Besonders ausgeprägt war Hilfesuchverhalten bei Personen mit Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie. Studie 2: Differential Familial Liability of Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia Panikattacken, Panikstörung und Agoraphobie der Eltern waren assoziiert mit denselben Syndromen der Kinder. Bei separater Untersuchung der Störungen wurde für Agoraphobie ohne Panikstörung keine Assoziation zwischen Eltern und Kindern beobachtet. Elterliche Panikstörung ohne Agoraphobie war nicht mit Panikstörung ohne Agoraphobie bei den Kindern, aber mit Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie (OR=3.9; 95% KI=1.6-9.4) assoziiert. Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie der Eltern war mit Agoraphobie ohne Panikstörung (OR=3.3; 95% KI=1.01-11.1) und mit Panikstörung ohne/mit Agoraphobie bei den Kindern assoziiert (ohne Agoraphobie: OR=4.2; 95% KI=1.2-13.7; mit Agoraphobie: OR=4.9; 95% KI=1.8-12.5). Bei Kontrolle nach anderen Angststörungen blieb nur die Assoziation von Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie bei Eltern und Kindern stabil. Es fanden sich keine Hinweise auf Assoziationen zwischen Panikstörung oder Agoraphobie der Eltern mit einem früheren Erstauftrittsalter der kindlichen Störung. Studie 3: Pathways into panic and phobias Der Komorbidität von Panikstörung, Agoraphobie und Spezifischen Phobien lag eine Vier-Klassen-Struktur zugrunde. Die Klassen konnten beschrieben werden als „sehr niedriges Risiko für Angststörungen“, „niedriges Risiko für Spezifische Phobien“, „moderates Risiko für Agoraphobie und Panikstörung“ und „hohes Risiko für Angststörungen“. Die letztgenannte Klasse zeichnete sich vor allem durch das Vorliegen von Agoraphobie und dem Situativen Subtypus der Spezifischen Phobie aus. Die drei letztgenannten Risikoklassen waren assoziiert mit weiblichem Geschlecht, Behavioral Inhibition, Harm Avoidance, überbehütendem und abweisendem Elternverhalten, elterlichen Angst- und depressiven Störungen, sowie Trennungs- und traumatischen Erlebnissen in der Kindheit. Die Klasse „hohes Risiko für Angststörungen“ war assoziiert mit elterlicher Spezifischer Phobie (OR=5.0, 95% KI=1.9-12.8) und postnatalen Komplikationen (OR=7.4; 95% KI=2.4-22.9). Sie unterschied sich darin von allen anderen Risikogruppen. Die Klasse „moderates Risiko für Agoraphobie und Panikstörung“ war assoziiert mit Trennungsangst in der Kindheit (OR=6.3; 95% KI=2.0-19.8), einem emotional kühlen elterlichen Erziehungsstil (OR=0.7; 95% KI=0.6-0.9) und einer geringen Wahrscheinlichkeit für postnatale Komplikationen (OR=0.3; 95% KI=0.1-0.9). Schlussfolgerungen: Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Inzidenzmusters, des Verlaufs und der Korrelate zwischen Panik- und Agoraphobiesyndromen zeigen, dass Agoraphobie getrennt von Paniksyndromen existiert und eine klinisch relevante Störung darstellt. Dabei hatte die Hälfte der Personen mit Agoraphobie keine Panikattacke erlebt und bliebe gemäß DSM-Kriterien undiagnostiziert. Ergebnisse der Familienstudie zeigen, dass Befunde zur familiären Aggregation von Panikstörung und Agoraphobie bisher von angewandten hierarchischen Diagnoseregeln abhängig waren. Ohne Anwendung hierarchischer Kriterien aggregiert Agoraphobie ohne Panikstörung nicht in Familien und die familiäre Aggregation von Panikstörung hängt davon ab, ob bei den Kindern komorbide Agoraphobie oder andere Angststörungen vorliegen. Die Ergebnisse der Latent Class Analysen lassen vermuten, dass Panikstörung, Agoraphobie und Spezifische Phobien sich im Rahmen von Vulnerabilitätsklassen entwickeln, auf zwei pathogene Mechanismen der Agoraphobie hinweisen: Agoraphobie kann sich entweder in naher Verwandtschaft zur Panikstörung, oder zum Situativen Subtypus der Spezifischen Phobie entwickeln. Spezifische Zusammenhänge dieser Risikoklassen mit untersuchten Vulnerabilitätsfaktoren stützen die Hypothese einer unterschiedlichen Ätiopathogenese der Agoraphobie. Zusammenfassend zeigen die vorliegenden Daten, dass Panikattacken und Panikstörung weder eine notwendige noch eine hinreichende Bedingung für Agoraphobie sind, und die derzeit gültige Klassifikation die Untersuchung der Agoraphobie behindert. Die aktuell in Arbeit befindliche Revision des DSM sollte im Sinne einer beschreibenden, durch empirische Daten gestützten Diagnostik das Konzept der Agoraphobie überarbeiten und von einer Diagnostik im Sinne einer nosologischen Kontroverse abrücken.

Background: ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents one of the leading causes of death. The time of STEMI onset has a circadian rhythm with a peak during diurnal hours, and the occurrence of STEMI follows a seasonal pattern with a salient peak of cases in the winter months and a marked reduction of cases in the summer months. Scholars investigated the reason behind the winter peak, suggesting that environmental and climatic factors concur in STEMI pathogenesis, but no studies have investigated whether the circadian rhythm is modified with the seasonal pattern, in particular during the summer reduction in STEMI occurrence. Methods and Results: Here, we provide a multiethnic and multination epidemiological study (from both hemispheres at different latitudes, n=2270 cases) that investigates whether the circadian variation of STEMI onset is altered in the summer season. The main finding is that the difference between numbers of diurnal (6:00 to 18:00) and nocturnal (18:00 to 6:00) STEMI is markedly decreased in the summer season, and this is a prodrome of a complex mechanism according to which the circadian rhythm of STEMI time onset seems season dependent. Conclusions: The “summer shift” of STEMI to the nocturnal interval is consistent across different populations, and the sunshine duration (a measure related to cloudiness and solar irradiance) underpins this season-dependent circadian perturbation. Vitamin D, which in our results seems correlated with this summer shift, is also primarily regulated by the sunshine duration, and future studies should investigate their joint role in the mechanisms of STEMI etiogenesis.

v anglickém jazyce Introduction: No information was known about frequency of common inflammatory disorders in rheumatology in the Czech Republic. Aims of the study: To estimate the standardized annual incidence (INC) and point prevalence (PREV) of six diseases (rheumatoid arthritis-RA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis-JIA, gout, psoriatic arthritis-PsA, ankylosing spondylitis-AS, reactive arthritis-ReA) in a population-based study in two regions of the Czech Republic (CR). Methods: INC: Incident cases were registered on condition that the definite diagnosis was confirmed according to existing classification criteria during the study period. PREV was studied on the basis of identification of established diagnoses at a time point. Crude rates were standardized for age and sex. Results: Both INC and PREV are shown per 100.000 inhabitants. RA INC:31 (95%CI 20-42), PREV:610 (95%CI 561-658). Gout-INC:41 (95%CI 28-53), PREV:300 (95% CI 266-334). JIA-INC: 13 (95% CI 1-20), PREV:140 (95%CI 117-280). PsA-INC:3,6 (95% CI 1-8), PREV:49 (95%CI 40-60). AS-INC:6 (95% CI 3-11), PREV:94 (95% CI 94-109). ReA-INC:9 (95% CI 6-15), PREV:91 (95% CI 78-106). Conclusion: This is the first population-based study estimating annual incidence and prevalence rates of the most common rheumatological disorders in the Czech...

No description available.

Introduction: The study ‘Mental healthcare provision for adults with intellectual disability and a mental disorder’ (MEMENTA) is a cross-sectional epidemiological study carried out in three different regions of Germany. Its main aim is to assess the prevalence of mental disorders in adults with intellectual disability (ID) as well as quality of mental healthcare for this population. Methods and analysis: The target population are persons aged between 18 and 65 years with a mild or moderate ID. The study population will be recruited through service providers. A representative sample is realised by two-stage sampling. First, institutions providing services for people with ID (sheltered workshops) are selected in a stratified cluster sampling, with strata being (1) types of service-providing non-governmental organisations and (2) sizes of their sheltered workshops. Then persons working in selected sheltered workshops are selected by simple random sampling. An estimated number of 600 adults with ID will be included. Information will be obtained from the group leaders in the sheltered workshops, informal carers or staff members in sheltered housing institutions and the person with ID. Besides the main outcome parameter of psychiatric symptomatology and problem behaviour, other outcome parameters such as needs for care, quality of life, caregiver burden, health services utilisation and costs for care are assessed using well-established standardised instruments. If a comorbid mental disorder is diagnosed, quality of mental healthcare will be assessed with open questions to all interview partners and, in addition, problem-focused interviews with a small subgroup. Analyses will be carried out using quantitative and qualitative methods. Ethics and dissemination: Approval of all three local ethics committees was obtained. Research findings will add much needed empirical information in order to improve services provided to this vulnerable group of patients.