Introduction: Les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ont la responsabilité d’offrir des services de qualité ancrés dans les données probantes. Cette responsabilité relève du rôle d’érudit selon le cadre de compétences CanMEDS. Quelle place occupe par ce rôle en clinique? Objectifs : 1) Documenter les perceptions, expériences et vécus en lien avec le rôle d’érudit chez les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’AVC. 2) Identifier les facteurs perçus comme facilitant ou entravant ce rôle clinique. Méthodologie : Étude qualitative exploratoire d’orientation phénoménologique par entrevue individuelle de professionnels travaillant en réadaptation de l’AVC depuis au moins deux ans. Codification des verbatim avec le logiciel QDA-Miner. Résultats : Les participants (âge moyen 40,7 ans ± 11,2) sont majoritairement des femmes (9/11) et leur expérience de travail en AVC varie de 3 à 23 ans. Les principaux thèmes identifiés sont: 1) Les savoirs tacites sont perçus comme synonyme du rôle d’érudit; 2) L’expérience de travail et l’intuition clinique amènent confiance et confort dans les pratiques; 3) L’insatisfaction quant au manque de partage des connaissances; 4) L’importance de la diversification dans les tâches cliniques et 5) La pratique réflexive est peu développée. Les quatre facteurs influençant le rôle d’érudit sont: la motivation; l’incident critique, les stagiaires et le manque de temps. Conclusion : Le rôle d’érudit apparaît peu valorisé par les participants. Il existe un écart entre le rôle d’érudit tel que décrit dans les cadres de compétences et la façon dont il est actualisé en pratique clinique. / Introduction: Stroke rehabilitation clinicians are responsible for offering quality services through evidence-based practice. This responsibility springs from the Scholar Role described in the CanMEDS framework. How is this role fulfilled in the clinical setting? Objective: 1) To explore the perceptions, experiences, and attitudes of rehabilitation professionals regarding their role as Scholar in their practice; 2) To identify factors that facilitate or hinder this role as scholar. Methods: Qualitative design with a phenomenological orientation. Face-to-face interviews were conducted among professional with at least two years experience in stroke rehabilitation using a pre-tested interview guide; Verbatims were coded using QDA-Miner software. Results: Mean age of the participants was 40.7 years ± 11.2. Participants were mostly women (n = 9/11). The role of scholar emerged as not having great value for the participants. Main themes emerging from the analysis include the following: 1) emphasis on tacit knowledge; 2) experience and clinical intuition leading to self-confidence and comfort in clinical practice; 3) dissatisfaction with the lack of knowledge sharing among clinicians; 4) importance of diversifying clinical tasks; 5) underdevelopment of reflective practice. The four factors influencing the role of scholar: motivation, critical incident as a trigger of reflective practice and interns facilitating reflective practice; lack of time acted as an obstacle. Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between the role of the scholar as described by the canMEDS framework and how it is actualized in clinical practice.

A hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) é uma doença crônica altamente prevalente, que pode ser controlada com tratamento farmacológico. Para tal, recomenda-se aplicar as melhores evidências clínicas por meio da utilização de guias de prática clínica (GPC) de alta qualidade. No entanto, o processo de desenvolvimento de GPC requer recursos humanos e tempo, sendo a adaptação uma opção para reduzir a duplicação de esforços e adequar o GPC para uso local. O objetivo deste trabalho foi sintetizar as recomendações de GPC para o tratamento farmacológico da HAS. Aplicou-se o método de adaptação ADAPTE, realizando as duas primeiras fases: Configuração e Adaptação. Na fase de Configuração, o Grupo CHRONIDE realizou o planejamento e registrou a pesquisa no Próspero. Na fase de Adaptação, realizou-se uma revisão sistemática. Os critérios de eligibilidade foram: GPC que continham recomendações para o tratamento farmacológico da HAS em atenção primária, publicados em inglês, português ou espanhol, no período de 01/01/2011 a 31/12/2016. Em 31/11/2017 atualizou-se GPC incluídos. Para a determinação da qualidade destes GPC, três avaliadores, de forma independente, aplicaram o Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II). Dos 37 GPC avaliados, 6 foram considerados de alta qualidade (escore 60% ou mais no domínio Rigor de desenvolvimento do AGREE II). As recomendações destes foram extraídas e incluídas nas matrizes. Os GPC apresentaram divergências em suas recomendações. As divergências mais relevantes foram as recomendações mais rigorosas do GPC de 2017 da American College of Cardiology e American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), que trouxe metas terapêuticas e níveis pressóricos para indicação de farmacoterapia mais baixos que os demais. A maioria dos GPC recomendou o uso de diuréticos tiazídicos como farmacoterapia de primeira linha para tratamento da HAS e contraindicou o uso combinado de inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina e bloqueadores dos receptores de angiotensina II. Portanto, em uma discussão para adaptação local de recomendações, um dos pontos principais, além da questão do acesso aos medicamentos, seria adotar ou não os paramêtros mais rigorosos do GPC 2017 ACC/AHA. / Arterial hypertension is a high prevalent chronic disease that can be controlled with pharmacologic treatment. For such, is recommended the use of the high clinical evidences presented in high quality clinical practice guidelines (CPG). However, the guideline development process requires time and capable human resources, which transform the adaptation to an option to reduce a duplication of efforts and to adapt the CPG to local use. The objective of this work was to synthesize the recommendations of CPG for the pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension. The ADAPTE method was applied, using 2 steps: Configuration and Adaptation. In the Configuration step, the CHRONIDE group carried out the planning and the method was registered in Prospero. In the Adaptation step a systematic review was performed. The eligibility criteria were: CPG containing recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension in primary care, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, from 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2016. On 11/31/2017 it was updated the GPC included. To determine the CPG quality, 3 independent reviewers, assessed the CPG using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Of the 37 evaluated CPG, 6 were considered to being as high quality (score 60% or higher in the domain \" Rigour of Development \"). The recommendations were extracted and included in the matrix of recommendations. The CPG has presentes differences in their recommendations. The most relevant divergences were the further rigorous recommendations described on CPG 2017 of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), which brought therapeutic goals and blood pressure levels lower for pharmacotherapy than the others recommendations. The majority of CPG has recommended the use of thiazide diuretics as first-line pharmacotherapy for the treatment of arterial hypertension and has contraindicated the combined use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. Therefore, in a discussion for local adaptation of recommendations, one of the main points, apart from the issue of access to medicines, would be to adopt or would not be adopt the futher rigorous parameters of GPC 2017 ACC/AHA.

No description available.

As an innovation Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is designed as a tool for clinical problem solving. According to its theory of use EBP will bring a difference for policy makers, for professionals, for researchers and for service users. One question to be asked is whether EBP actually leads to the radical social change it is designed to accomplish. The aim of the study is to describe and analyse the outcome of the effort to establish EBP, with a focus on the case of social work in Sweden. The research questions are: What is EBP? Why are efforts made to establish EBP? What is the outcome of the EBP project? How can the outcome of the EBP project be explained? The case study was conducted on a critical realistic meta-theoretical ground with a focus on explanation of social change with an explicit actor-structure perspective. Methodologically, a narrative synthesis of studies was made. As a complement primary data were collected to fill empirical gaps. The state of things was described before and after the EBP-initiatives. Several helping theories – Kuhn’s theory of paradigm, program theory, neo-institutional theory and theory of diffusion – were used to analyse the empirically mapped outcome of the EBP project. The results show that the import of the original model of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) to social work is a part of a wider social movement in the helping and educational professions. The new model has influenced social work as a discipline, as a field of practice and as a field of policy. There are examples of full-scale implementations of EBP, although EBP has not reached a general status as daily practice. Some obstacles remain. The gradual adaption of EBP corresponds to criteria hold by Kuhn for a paradigm shift. Acceptance of the model has contributed to change the structure and function of social systems. At an organizational level, this change means on-going institutionalization. The innovation is influencing the way institutional actors conduct their work. Although the structural conditions have been optimal, the EBP-model has been debated with heat. The EBP-debate and policy-driven infrastructural efforts have brought a more in-depth examination of the model. So-called coercive, normative, and regulative isomorphisms were used to change organizations. The degree of institutionalization depended on the individuals and the organizations willingness and preparedness to change, to understand, and to put the model into practice. When actors used a less strict version of the original EBP model, the pace of cultural and institutional change slowed down.

Les interventions proactives ou comportementales en classe sont reconnues empiriquement pour leur efficacité à améliorer le comportement ou le rendement scolaire des enfants ayant un TDAH (DuPaul & Eckert, 1997; Hoza, Kaiser, & Hurt, 2008; Pelham & Fabiano, 2008; Zentall, 2005). Or, l’écart entre les interventions probantes et celles retrouvées dans le milieu général de l’éducation souligne l’importance de répliquer les résultats d’études obtenus dans un environnement contrôlé dans un format de livraison réaliste. L’objectif principal de cette thèse est d’élaborer et d’évaluer un programme de consultation individuelle (PCI) fondé sur une démarche de résolution de problème et d’évaluation fonctionnelle, pour soutenir les enseignants du primaire dans la planification et la mise en œuvre cohérente des interventions privilégiées pour aider les enfants ayant un TDAH. D’abord, une recension des principales modalités d’intervention auprès des enfants ayant un TDAH est effectuée afin d’identifier les interventions à inclure lors du développement du programme. Par la suite, des solutions favorisant le transfert des interventions probantes à la classe ordinaire sont détaillées par la proposition du PCI ayant lieu entre un intervenant psychosocial et l’enseignant. Enfin, l’évaluation du PCI auprès de trente-sept paires enfant-enseignant est présentée. Tous les enfants ont un diagnostic de TDAH et prennent une médication (M). Les parents de certains enfants ont participé à un programme d’entraînement aux habiletés parentales (PEHP). L’échantillon final est: M (n = 4), M et PEHP (n = 11), M et PCI (n = 11), M, PEHP et PCI (n = 11). Les résultats confirment l’efficacité du PCI au-delà de M et M + PEHP pour éviter une aggravation des comportements inappropriés et améliorer le rendement scolaire des enfants ayant un TDAH. Par ailleurs, une augmentation de l’utilisation des stratégies efficaces par l’enseignant est observable lorsqu’il a à la fois participé au PCI et reçu une formation continue sur le TDAH en cours d’emploi. Les implications cliniques de l’intervention pour l’enfant ayant un TDAH et son enseignant de classe ordinaire sont discutées. / Classroom management interventions, such as behavior and academic strategies, are well-established interventions for improving social behavior and academic skills of children with ADHD (DuPaul & Eckert, 1997; Hoza, Kaiser, & Hurt, 2008; Pelham & Fabiano, 2008; Zentall, 2005). However, bridging the gap between research and practice raises the question of the practicality of interventions. Therefore, results from controlled studies need to be replicated in regular classrooms with a format that takes into account the practicality of the intervention. The aim of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of a consultation-based program for teachers (CPT), using a problem-solving approach and a functional assessment to support elementary school teachers in the knowledge of the principles, design and implementation of classroom management evidence-based practices for children with ADHD. First, a review of the literature identifying the main interventions for ADHD children is presented. Then, the consultation-based program for regular class teachers involving solutions in the implementation of these evidence-based strategies in the classroom is detailed. Finally, the evaluation of the CPT implemented with thirty-seven child-teacher pairs is presented. All children were diagnosed as ADHD and received a stimulant medication treatment (M). The parents of some of these children had previously participated in a parent-training program (PTP). The final group composition is: M (n = 4); M + PTP (n = 11), M + CPT (n = 11), M + PTP + CPT (n = 11). Findings confirm the effectiveness of the CPT above and beyond M, and M + PTP to prevent the intensification of inappropriate behaviors and to improve academic performance of ADHD children. Results also indicate that teachers who participated in the CPT and had previous continuing education on ADHD showed a significant improvement of their classroom management strategies. Overall findings offer valuable information for discussing clinical implications for the psychosocial treatment of ADHD children.

As an innovation Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is designed as a tool for clinical problem solving. According to its theory of use EBP will bring a difference for policy makers, for professionals, for researchers and for service users. One question to be asked is whether EBP actually leads to the radical social change it is designed to accomplish. The aim of the study is to describe and analyse the outcome of the effort to establish EBP, with a focus on the case of social work in Sweden. The research questions are: What is EBP? Why are efforts made to establish EBP? What is the outcome of the EBP project? How can the outcome of the EBP project be explained? The case study was conducted on a critical realistic meta-theoretical ground with a focus on explanation of social change with an explicit actor-structure perspective. Methodologically, a narrative synthesis of studies was made. As a complement primary data were collected to fill empirical gaps. The state of things was described before and after the EBP-initiatives. Several helping theories – Kuhn’s theory of paradigm, program theory, neo-institutional theory and theory of diffusion – were used to analyse the empirically mapped outcome of the EBP project. The results show that the import of the original model of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) to social work is a part of a wider social movement in the helping and educational professions. The new model has influenced social work as a discipline, as a field of practice and as a field of policy. There are examples of full-scale implementations of EBP, although EBP has not reached a general status as daily practice. Some obstacles remain. The gradual adaption of EBP corresponds to criteria hold by Kuhn for a paradigm shift. Acceptance of the model has contributed to change the structure and function of social systems. At an organizational level, this change means on-going institutionalization. The innovation is influencing the way institutional actors conduct their work. Although the structural conditions have been optimal, the EBP-model has been debated with heat. The EBP-debate and policy-driven infrastructural efforts have brought a more in-depth examination of the model. So-called coercive, normative, and regulative isomorphisms were used to change organizations. The degree of institutionalization depended on the individuals and the organizations willingness and preparedness to change, to understand, and to put the model into practice. When actors used a less strict version of the original EBP model, the pace of cultural and institutional change slowed down.

Introduction: Les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ont la responsabilité d’offrir des services de qualité ancrés dans les données probantes. Cette responsabilité relève du rôle d’érudit selon le cadre de compétences CanMEDS. Quelle place occupe par ce rôle en clinique? Objectifs : 1) Documenter les perceptions, expériences et vécus en lien avec le rôle d’érudit chez les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’AVC. 2) Identifier les facteurs perçus comme facilitant ou entravant ce rôle clinique. Méthodologie : Étude qualitative exploratoire d’orientation phénoménologique par entrevue individuelle de professionnels travaillant en réadaptation de l’AVC depuis au moins deux ans. Codification des verbatim avec le logiciel QDA-Miner. Résultats : Les participants (âge moyen 40,7 ans ± 11,2) sont majoritairement des femmes (9/11) et leur expérience de travail en AVC varie de 3 à 23 ans. Les principaux thèmes identifiés sont: 1) Les savoirs tacites sont perçus comme synonyme du rôle d’érudit; 2) L’expérience de travail et l’intuition clinique amènent confiance et confort dans les pratiques; 3) L’insatisfaction quant au manque de partage des connaissances; 4) L’importance de la diversification dans les tâches cliniques et 5) La pratique réflexive est peu développée. Les quatre facteurs influençant le rôle d’érudit sont: la motivation; l’incident critique, les stagiaires et le manque de temps. Conclusion : Le rôle d’érudit apparaît peu valorisé par les participants. Il existe un écart entre le rôle d’érudit tel que décrit dans les cadres de compétences et la façon dont il est actualisé en pratique clinique. / Introduction: Stroke rehabilitation clinicians are responsible for offering quality services through evidence-based practice. This responsibility springs from the Scholar Role described in the CanMEDS framework. How is this role fulfilled in the clinical setting? Objective: 1) To explore the perceptions, experiences, and attitudes of rehabilitation professionals regarding their role as Scholar in their practice; 2) To identify factors that facilitate or hinder this role as scholar. Methods: Qualitative design with a phenomenological orientation. Face-to-face interviews were conducted among professional with at least two years experience in stroke rehabilitation using a pre-tested interview guide; Verbatims were coded using QDA-Miner software. Results: Mean age of the participants was 40.7 years ± 11.2. Participants were mostly women (n = 9/11). The role of scholar emerged as not having great value for the participants. Main themes emerging from the analysis include the following: 1) emphasis on tacit knowledge; 2) experience and clinical intuition leading to self-confidence and comfort in clinical practice; 3) dissatisfaction with the lack of knowledge sharing among clinicians; 4) importance of diversifying clinical tasks; 5) underdevelopment of reflective practice. The four factors influencing the role of scholar: motivation, critical incident as a trigger of reflective practice and interns facilitating reflective practice; lack of time acted as an obstacle. Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between the role of the scholar as described by the canMEDS framework and how it is actualized in clinical practice.

The purpose of this study was to determine the nurse educators’ experiences in implementing the evidence-based practice (EBP) in teaching and learning, and to describe the importance and benefits of EBP teaching and learning to the nursing profession, especially for nurse educators and student nurses. A qualitative research design and methods were followed in conducting the study. A non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to access the sample of twelve nurse educators from two nursing campuses under KwaZulu-Natal College of Nursing within Umgungundlovu Health District. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, the interview guide, and the digital voice recorder. Data were analysed manually, following a content thematic data analysis approach. Two themes emerged as follows:  Challenges experienced by nurse educators with the implementation of EBP in teaching and learning.  Benefits/value of EBP in teaching and learning. Findings revealed that, although most of the nurse educators are supportive and displayed a positive attitude towards implementing EBP in teaching and learning, the level of knowledge and skills was questionable. This was coupled with a lack of motivation and commitment towards research. Therefore, recommendations for nursing education, nursing practice, and future research were suggested, for successful implementation of EBP in teaching and learning. / Health Studies / M.A. (Health Studies)

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), the philosophy underpinning professional service in the health care industry in the U.S.A. and U.K., has been accepted as a paradigm for psychological practice by the American Psychological Association (APA). The APA recommends that professionals base their clinical decisions on scientifically supported research and an understanding of their clients' specific ecological disposition. Clients are considered to have a right to efficacious interventions based on objective research findings, effective service and a high standard of care. Sub-divisions of EBP are Evidence-Based Treatments (EBT) and Evidence-Based Assessment (EBA). . South African educational psychologists have a meagre assessment ‘toolkit’ - outdated, culturally insensitive, non-standardised tests for culturally and linguistically diverse clients. Children from diverse backgrounds would have higher standards of care and more efficacious interventions were psycho-educational assessments to be culturally-sensitive. Without such instruments, ethical management of interventions is questionable, although universally, psychologists have found innovative ways of adapting their praxis to the difficulty. However, all practices and/or interventions are not based on research evidence, nor can be necessarily considered good practice. In the U.S.A. with its abundance of assessment instruments, EBA is a means of ensuring the scientific foundation for professional practice, consequently reliable, valid, culturally-sensitive assessment instruments have been produced. Findings in this study, derived from conversations with a sample of educational psychologists, revealed they were already accommodating cultural and linguistic diversity. Awareness of the value of EBA would support educational psychologists, bring them on par with worldwide praxis and enhance their professionalism. / Teacher Education / D. Ed. (Psychology of Education)

No description available.