No description available.

Background: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging approach for improving capacity in activities of daily living (ADL) and upper limb function after stroke. However, it remains unclear what type of tDCS stimulation is most effective. Our aim was to give an overview of the evidence network regarding the efficacy and safety of tDCS and to estimate the effectiveness of the different stimulation types. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomised trials using network meta-analysis (NMA), searching the following databases until 5 July 2016: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science, and four other databases. We included studies with adult people with stroke. We compared any kind of active tDCS (anodal, cathodal, or dual, that is applying anodal and cathodal tDCS concurrently) regarding improvement of our primary outcome of ADL capacity, versus control, after stroke. PROSPERO ID: CRD42016042055. Results: We included 26 studies with 754 participants. Our NMA showed evidence of an effect of cathodal tDCS in improving our primary outcome, that of ADL capacity (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.42; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.70). tDCS did not improve our secondary outcome, that of arm function, measured by the Fugl-Meyer upperextremity assessment (FM-UE). There was no difference in safety between tDCS and its control interventions, measured by the number of dropouts and adverse events. Conclusion: Comparing different forms of tDCS shows that cathodal tDCS is the most promising treatment option to improve ADL capacity in people with stroke.

Background: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging approach for improving capacity in activities of daily living (ADL) and upper limb function after stroke. However, it remains unclear what type of tDCS stimulation is most effective. Our aim was to give an overview of the evidence network regarding the efficacy and safety of tDCS and to estimate the effectiveness of the different stimulation types. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomised trials using network meta-analysis (NMA), searching the following databases until 5 July 2016: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science, and four other databases. We included studies with adult people with stroke. We compared any kind of active tDCS (anodal, cathodal, or dual, that is applying anodal and cathodal tDCS concurrently) regarding improvement of our primary outcome of ADL capacity, versus control, after stroke. PROSPERO ID: CRD42016042055. Results: We included 26 studies with 754 participants. Our NMA showed evidence of an effect of cathodal tDCS in improving our primary outcome, that of ADL capacity (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.42; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.70). tDCS did not improve our secondary outcome, that of arm function, measured by the Fugl-Meyer upperextremity assessment (FM-UE). There was no difference in safety between tDCS and its control interventions, measured by the number of dropouts and adverse events. Conclusion: Comparing different forms of tDCS shows that cathodal tDCS is the most promising treatment option to improve ADL capacity in people with stroke.

Dopamin und Acetylcholin sind wichtige neuromodulatorische Substanzen im menschlichen zentralen Nervensystem mir einem starken Einfluß auf Neuroplastizität. Der spezifische Einfluß dieser Substanzen auf Neuroplastizität wird durch verschiedene Faktoren, unter anderem Dosisabhängigkeit, Hintergrundaktivität neuronaler Netze und Subrezeptorspezifität determiniert. In dieser Dissertation haben wir den dosis- und subrezeptorabhängigen Effekt des cholinergen und dopaminergen Systems auf Neuroplastizität des menschlichen motorischen Kortex untersucht. Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) und gepaarte assoziative Stimulation (PAS) stellen nicht-invasive Hirnstimulationstechniken dar, die die Erzeugung von Neuroplastizität beim Menschen ermöglichen. Wir haben in unseren Studien tDCS zur Erzeugung nicht-fokaler und PAS zur Erzeugung fokaler synapsenspezifischer Plastizität im motorischen Kortex von gesunden Probanden eingesetzt. In der ersten Studie konnten wir zeigen, daß die Aktivierung nikotinischer Rezeptoren einen fokussierenden Effekt auf fazilitatorische Plastizität hatte, inhibitorische Plastizität aber unabhängig von ihrer Fokalität verhinderte. Somit hat die Aktivierung nikotinerger Rezeptoren ähnliche Effekte wie globale cholinerge Aktivierung auf fazilitatorische, aber differente Effekte auf inhibitorische Plastizität. In der zweiten Studie untersuchten wir die dosisabhängigen Auswirkungen der Dopamin-Vorläufersubstanz l-Dopa auf Neuroplastizität. Bei mittlerer Dosis von l-Dopa war fokale Plastizität unverändert, wohingegen niedrige und hohe Dosen von l-Dopa die Induktion von Plastizität verhinderten. Die Ergebnisse zeigen somit einen klaren nicht-linearen dosisabhängigen Effekt. Aus den Ergebnissen dieser Studien kann geschlossen werden, daß Neuromodulatoren Plastizität im motorischen Kortex des Menschen relevant beeinflussen. Diese Effekte sind Subrezeptor- und Dosis-abhängig.

No description available.

No description available.