La recherche se donne pour objectif de définir comment la construction des régimes de valeurs artistiques, mémorielles et historiques du Guernica - œuvre d’art réalisée par Pablo Picasso en 1937 - participe à l’écriture patrimoniale du tableau-monument, d'une part, et devient opératoire dans la réactivation ou l’actualisation de la mémoire des événements auxquels il réfère, dans le cadre de la visite muséale, d'autre part. Trois niveaux de recherche ont été pensés. Le premier a été de circonscrire l’objet Guernica en tant qu’objet d’art en posant un socle d’analyse de l’objet détaché de tout contexte, et ce, afin de mieux appréhender ceux par lesquels il existe en tant qu’objet culturel signifié dans des contextes temporels et géographiques. Dans un deuxième temps, l’analyse des différentes mises en exposition du Guernica ont permis de saisir les différentes valeurs d’usage qui lui ont été attribuées et comprendre ainsi comment il s'est construit en tant qu’objet patrimonial. Enfin, dans un troisième temps, au regard d’une analyse détaillée de la mise en exposition du Guernica au MNCARS en 2009 et 2013, 60 entretiens menées selon une méthodologie qualitative après la visite ont été analysé afin de comprendre les valeurs d’usage que mobilisent les espagnols lors de la réception et pour quelles raisons. L’intérêt de l’enquête est d’avoir révélé qu’il existait un éventail de mémoires et d’appréhensions afférentes à l’objet Guernica. Les enquêtes ont été analysées sous le prisme de la sensibilité politique (Républicains et Nationalistes), mais surtout sous celui du prisme générationnel, et pour lequel quatre générations sont identifiées. Les résultats d’analyse par générations, permettent de distinguer deux types de rapport au Guernica : réactivation et actualisation. Les notions de réactivation et d’actualisation (Georgescu-Paquin, 2013) s’insèrent dans une logique de rupture-continuité, nécessaire à tout processus de patrimonialisation (Davallon, 2006). Dans ce cas d’étude, le MNCARS propose un cadre portant sur un versant de l’histoire qui, à défaut d’apaiser les tensions, les ravivent pour certains (Nationalistes) ; tandis que d’autres, se retrouvent dans un processus entamé depuis peu (Républicains), suite à la Loi dite de « mémoire historique » (2007). En revanche, les nouvelles générations présentent un regard apaisé et distancié qui leur permet de rendre opératoire l’écriture patrimoniale du Guernica. / The research aims to define how the construction of regimes of artistic, memorial and historical values ​​of Guernica - a work of art made by Pablo Picasso in 1937 - participates in the patrimonial writing of the painting-monument, on the one hand, and becomes operative in the reactivation or updating of the memory of the events to which it refers, as part of the museum visit, on the other hand. Three levels of research have been thought out. The first was to circumscribe the Guernica object as an art object by placing a base of analysis of the object detached from any context, and this, in order to better understand those by which it exists as a cultural object signified in temporal and geographical contexts. In a second step, the analysis of the different exposures of Guernica made it possible to grasp the different values ​​of use which were attributed to him and this to understand how it was constructed as a patrimonial object. Finally, in a third step, in the light of a detailed analysis of the exhibition of Guernica at MNCARS in 2009 and 2013, 60 interviews conducted according to a qualitative methodology after the visit were analyzed in order to understand the use values ​​that mobilize the spaniards at the reception and for what reasons. The interest of the investigation is to have revealed that there was a range of memories and apprehensions related to the Guernica object. The surveys were analyzed under the prism of political sensitivity (Republicans and Nationalists), but especially under that of the generational prism, and for which four generations are identified. The results of analysis by generations, allow to distinguish two types of report to Guernica: reactivation and actualization. The notions of reactivation and actualization (Georgescu-Paquin, 2013) are part of a logic of rupture-continuity, which is necessary for any heritage-making process (Davallon, 2006). In this case of study, the MNCARS proposes a framework on a side of the history which, if not soothing the tensions, revives them for some (Nationalists); while others, find themselves in a process started recently (Republicans), following the so-called law of "historical memory" (2007). On the other hand, the new generations present a calm and distanced glance which allows them to make operative the patrimonial writing of Guernica.

Denna undersökning har studerat fäbodstugan och fäbodmiljön i ett tidsperspektiv. Från att ha varit en del av jordbrukssystemet till att bli ett område för rekreation. En enkätundersökning genomfördes för att fånga brukarnas åsikter i Västtjärnslindans fäbod. En jämförelse mellan värden ur ett myndighetsperspektiv och ett brukarperspektiv genomfördes därefter. Förändringar i fäbodmiljön undersöktes också i Västtjärnslindans fäbod. Undersökningen visar att värderingen skiljer sig inte så mycket mellan parterna, snarare att det handlar om benämningar och tolkningar av de kulturvärden som lyfts i Bastbergets fäbod jämfört med i Västtjärnslindans fäbod. Studien visar att de förändringar som identifierats i Västtjärnslindan inte utgör något hot mot bevarande av kulturmiljön. Snarare att nya värden appliceras på de gamla värdena som kvarstår, som lager på lager. Oavsett om fäbodmiljön är utpekad av kulturarvsmyndigheter eller ej innehar den höga kulturvärden som i ett brukande bevaras för framtida generationer. Ett bevarande i brukandet vill uppnås för att få ett användbart hållbart kulturarv. / This study looks into shacks in a time perspective from being a part of the agricultural system to a new purpose for recreation. This was made by studying cultural values and changes from a authority-perspecitve and from the peoples-perspective living and using the cultural area in these shacks. From the authority-perspecive the study looked into processes in valuing cultural values and management regulations in Bastbergets fäbod as an example. A survey was created to investigating the peoples-perspective in Västtjärnslindan fäbod. The study shows that the most important cultural values are quite similar independent of whom valuing the cultural environment (either authorities or people using it). Changes to more modern appearance in the study shows that they are not affecting character traits of the cultural shacks environment. The cultural values appears to be a layer on layer values in the cultural environment. To conclude it is importent to reach conservation in using the shacks environment to obtain a useful sustainable cultural heritage.

This study has a threefold aim:  to make a theological contextualisation of four medieval anti-Jewish motifs in Christian iconography represented in churches in Sweden and to study how these motifs has been described and contextualised in guidebooks and other material written for the interested public from post-war to recent years. The study also explores the role of heritagisation and musealisation of the church buildings in relation to how the motifs are described in the material. There is also an underlying, constructive aim: to suggest how The Church of Sweden can work with these motifs in theological reflection and historical presentations to the public concerning this part of the cultural heritage. The motifs analysed are The Judensau, Ecclesia and Synagoga, Cain and a motif illustrating a medieval legend about the funeral of the Virgin Mary. They were all painted in Swedish churches in a time when there were no Jewish settlements in the area. The study argues that the iconography can be interpreted as an expression of othering and that the four motifs can all be theologically contextualised by using Jesper Svartvik’s threefold typology of Christian anti-Jewish discourse. The study further shows that very few of the texts in the guidebooks and other books in the material describes the motifs and contextualises them theologically.  The study suggests that this can be related to the more than hundred years old heritagisation- and musealisation process in The Church of Sweden which has created a twofold and split role of the church as both manager of the religious mission and of the cultural heritage.   It has not been the primary aim of the church to theologically contextualise the cultural heritage. New questions concerning the motifs arise in today’s multicultural and multireligious society. The study suggests that the church can approach the part of the cultural heritage which today is seen as problematic from David Lowenthal’s concept of an informed acceptance and tolerance of the past in order to be able to take responsibility for the future in dialogue with others.