Submitted by admin tede (tede@pucgoias.edu.br) on 2017-10-04T14:25:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ESTELAMARIS BRANT SCAREL.pdf: 650185 bytes, checksum: 67556e31dd8154a6966aa16ef460099e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-04T14:25:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ESTELAMARIS BRANT SCAREL.pdf: 650185 bytes, checksum: 67556e31dd8154a6966aa16ef460099e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003-08-01 / This research intends, basead on FOUCAULT, to examine – through XVI, XVII, XVIII and XIX centuries - the conditions of possibility existence of certain knowledges, such as General Grammar, Natural History and the Wealth Analysis, and its rupture with the appearance, in this areas, of new empiricities, such as Philology, Economy and Biology. These Empiricities interact with a new knowledge about man, arised in Modern times: the Human Sciences. From there on, it is tried to describe what has it been the speech of education, since the emergence of this field of knowledge in the XIX century. On the following, it is intended to discuss that education, even though proclaming the construction of individuals justice and citizenship, on the contrary, makes docile subjects and individuals politically passive, due to its normalizatiny and to disciplinatiny function. That happens because modern society is normative and establishes full control over individuals. It is panoptic society. At last, the point of view of FOUCAULT about specificities of intelectual matters in modern society and the urgency of the educator to think about the necessity of his function to be reelaborated. / Esta pesquisa objetiva, com base em FOUCAULT, examinar - ao longo dos séculos XVI, XVII, XVIII e XIX - as condições de possibilidade da existência de determinados saberes, tais como: a Gramática Geral, a História Natural e a Análise das Riquezas e, a sua ruptura com o surgimento, nesses solos, de novas empiricidades, quais sejam a Filologia, a Economia e a Biologia. Estas Empiricidades se inter-relacionam com um novo saber sobre o homem, surgido na modernidade: as Ciências Humanas. A partir daí, busca-se descrever qual tem sido o discurso da educação, desde a emergência desse campo do conhecimento no século XIX. Em seguida, pretende-se discutir que a educação, embora preconize a construção dos sujeitos, a justiça e a cidadania, pelo contrário, fabrica corpos dóceis e indivíduos politicamente passivos, em decorrência de sua função normalizadora e disciplinar. Isso ocorre porque a sociedade moderna é normativa e estabelece o controle total sobre os sujeitos. É uma sociedade panóptica. Por último, aponta-se a visão de FOUCAULT sobre as especificidades do intelectual na sociedade moderna e a premência de o educador pensar sobre a necessidade de sua função ser reelaborada.

No description available.

Appliquée à la formation du lien matrimonial, la clandestinité est une infraction multiple. Contrepoint doctrinal nécessaire pour établir le consensualisme matrimonial, la clandestinité n'en demeure pas moins une infraction aux lois de l'Eglise. Les mariages clandestins sont valides bien que moralement mauvais, potentiellement illicites, théoriquement illégitimes, canoniquement interdits. Théologiens et canonistes craignent d'inextricables dilemmes juridiques et moraux sapant les fondements de l'institution matrimoniale et discréditant l'action régulatrice de la justice d'Eglise empêchée de juger selon la vérité. De micro-processus de prise en charge, de recomposition d'une norme et d'une infraction apparaissent en pratique. La régulation judiciaire épiscopale a construit des instruments de lutte contre les mariages clandestins qui se révèlent des instruments de contrôle socio-religieux au service d'un renforcement du cadre paroissial et du pouvoir juridictionnel de l'évêque

Tendo em vista uma contribuição para a discussão epistemológica sobre as ciências humanas e para o problema da objetividade do conhecimento científico que orientava os primeiros modelos filosóficos dirigidos à sustentação das Geistwissenschaften, esta dissertação procura reconstruir um modelo filosófico que teve papel ativo no debate, mas que ainda é pouco explorado em seu caráter epistemológico: o pensamento de Georg Simmel. Simmel fez parte de um grupo de filósofos alemães críticos ao nascimento naturalista das ciências humanas. Para eles, enquanto as naturais procuram explicar (erklären) a realidade por experimentação e análise causal, as ciências do espírito procuram compreender (verstehen) o fenômeno social através da interpretação das motivações dos indivíduos. Sua estratégia de penetração no fenômeno social recebeu o nome de Verstehen, ou compreensão. Devido à penetração no fenômeno social e aos diferentes pontos de vista abarcados, uma das críticas centrais enfrentada pelo grupo foi o perspectivismo, levantado como problema pelos positivistas. Simmel explorou o conceito de Verstehen partindo de uma crítica à visão mecanicista, circunscrita pelo realismo histórico e influenciada pelos pressupostos naturalistas e positivistas. Ademais, sua Verstehen sofreu modificações conceituais, as quais podem ser comparadas ao dividir o conjunto da obra simmeliana em dois grandes momentos epistêmicos: Idealista e Vitalista. Dada esta divisão, e tendo em mente o problema da objetividade e perspectivismo, a presente investigação é delineada a partir de três hipóteses iniciais. A primeira é, justamente, a existência de diferentes quadros conceituais em Simmel, os quais demonstram uma progressão intelectual madura e cada vez mais preocupada em explicar a natureza da Verstehen e como ela funciona. Esta hipótese contribui tanto para a discussão epistemológica das ciências, como para o melhor uso do autor, seja de seus escritos filosóficos ou sociológicos. A segunda hipótese refere-se especificamente ao conceito de Verstehen, admitindo-se a existência de duas noções de Verstehen, cada qual ligada a um dos períodos. Na fase Idealista, Simmel parece ter uma preocupação mais metodológica concernente à Verstehen. Na fase Vitalista, a Verstehen simmeliana surge como a relação fundamental entre indivíduos, ou seja, algo além de um conceito metodológico. De modo geral, a noção de compreensão perde o vínculo direto com a representação projetada e passa a vincular-se diretamente à noção de vida, como uma relação fundamental entre seres humanos. A terceira hipótese, por fim, vincula-se ao período Vitalista e tem como premissa um perspectivismo necessário para o conhecimento científico. Com o desenvolvimento intelectual da obra simmeliana, o perspectivismo deixa de ser um problema e passa a ser uma condição da investigação humana, uma condição que deve ser aceita com vistas a maior conhecimento científico da realidade social. Por fim, registram-se encaminhamentos para futuras investigações. / In order to contribute to the epistemological discussion about the human sciences and to the problem of the objectivity of scientific knowledge that guided the first philosophical models aimed at sustaining the Geistwissenschaften, this dissertation seeks to reconstruct a philosophical model that played an active part in the debate, but rather it is still little explored in its epistemological character: the thought of Georg Simmel. Simmel was part of a group of German philosophers critical of the naturalistic birth of the humanities. For them, while the natural sciences seek to explain (erklären) reality by experimentation and causal analysis, the human sciences seek to understand (verstehen) the social phenomenon through the interpretation of the inner motivations of individuals. Their strategy of penetrating into the social phenomenon was called Verstehen. Due to the penetration of the social phenomenon and the different points of view, one of the central criticisms faced by the group was the perspectivism, raised as a problem by the positivists. Simmel explored the concept of Verstehen from a critique of the mechanistic view, circumscribed by historical realism and influenced by naturalist and positivist assumptions. In addition, his Verstehen underwent conceptual modifications, which can be compared by dividing the whole of the Simmelian work into two great epistemic moments: Idealist and Vitalist. Given this division, and bearing in mind the problem of objectivity and perspectivism, the present investigation is delineated from three initial hypotheses. The first is precisely the existence of different conceptual frameworks in Simmel, which demonstrate a mature and increasingly preoccupied intellectual progression in explaining the nature of Verstehen and how it functions. This hypothesis contributes as much to the epistemological discussion of the sciences, as to the best use of the author, or of his philosophical or sociological writings. The second hypothesis refers specifically to the concept of Verstehen, admitting the existence of two notions of Verstehen, each connected to one of the periods. In the Idealist phase, Simmel seems to have a more methodological concern about Verstehen. In the Vitalist phase, the Simmelian Verstehen emerges as the fundamental relationship between individuals, that is, something beyond a methodological concept. In general, the notion of Verstehen loses the direct link with projected representation, and becomes directly linked to the notion of life as a fundamental relation between human beings. Finally, the third hypothesis is linked to the Vitalist period and is premised on the perspectivism as necessary for scientific knowledge. With the intellectual development of the Simmelian work, perspectivism ceases to be a problem and becomes a condition of human inquiry, a condition that should be accepted resulting in greater scientific knowledge of social reality. Finally, there are guidelines for future investigations.

Tendo em vista uma contribuição para a discussão epistemológica sobre as ciências humanas e para o problema da objetividade do conhecimento científico que orientava os primeiros modelos filosóficos dirigidos à sustentação das Geistwissenschaften, esta dissertação procura reconstruir um modelo filosófico que teve papel ativo no debate, mas que ainda é pouco explorado em seu caráter epistemológico: o pensamento de Georg Simmel. Simmel fez parte de um grupo de filósofos alemães críticos ao nascimento naturalista das ciências humanas. Para eles, enquanto as naturais procuram explicar (erklären) a realidade por experimentação e análise causal, as ciências do espírito procuram compreender (verstehen) o fenômeno social através da interpretação das motivações dos indivíduos. Sua estratégia de penetração no fenômeno social recebeu o nome de Verstehen, ou compreensão. Devido à penetração no fenômeno social e aos diferentes pontos de vista abarcados, uma das críticas centrais enfrentada pelo grupo foi o perspectivismo, levantado como problema pelos positivistas. Simmel explorou o conceito de Verstehen partindo de uma crítica à visão mecanicista, circunscrita pelo realismo histórico e influenciada pelos pressupostos naturalistas e positivistas. Ademais, sua Verstehen sofreu modificações conceituais, as quais podem ser comparadas ao dividir o conjunto da obra simmeliana em dois grandes momentos epistêmicos: Idealista e Vitalista. Dada esta divisão, e tendo em mente o problema da objetividade e perspectivismo, a presente investigação é delineada a partir de três hipóteses iniciais. A primeira é, justamente, a existência de diferentes quadros conceituais em Simmel, os quais demonstram uma progressão intelectual madura e cada vez mais preocupada em explicar a natureza da Verstehen e como ela funciona. Esta hipótese contribui tanto para a discussão epistemológica das ciências, como para o melhor uso do autor, seja de seus escritos filosóficos ou sociológicos. A segunda hipótese refere-se especificamente ao conceito de Verstehen, admitindo-se a existência de duas noções de Verstehen, cada qual ligada a um dos períodos. Na fase Idealista, Simmel parece ter uma preocupação mais metodológica concernente à Verstehen. Na fase Vitalista, a Verstehen simmeliana surge como a relação fundamental entre indivíduos, ou seja, algo além de um conceito metodológico. De modo geral, a noção de compreensão perde o vínculo direto com a representação projetada e passa a vincular-se diretamente à noção de vida, como uma relação fundamental entre seres humanos. A terceira hipótese, por fim, vincula-se ao período Vitalista e tem como premissa um perspectivismo necessário para o conhecimento científico. Com o desenvolvimento intelectual da obra simmeliana, o perspectivismo deixa de ser um problema e passa a ser uma condição da investigação humana, uma condição que deve ser aceita com vistas a maior conhecimento científico da realidade social. Por fim, registram-se encaminhamentos para futuras investigações. / In order to contribute to the epistemological discussion about the human sciences and to the problem of the objectivity of scientific knowledge that guided the first philosophical models aimed at sustaining the Geistwissenschaften, this dissertation seeks to reconstruct a philosophical model that played an active part in the debate, but rather it is still little explored in its epistemological character: the thought of Georg Simmel. Simmel was part of a group of German philosophers critical of the naturalistic birth of the humanities. For them, while the natural sciences seek to explain (erklären) reality by experimentation and causal analysis, the human sciences seek to understand (verstehen) the social phenomenon through the interpretation of the inner motivations of individuals. Their strategy of penetrating into the social phenomenon was called Verstehen. Due to the penetration of the social phenomenon and the different points of view, one of the central criticisms faced by the group was the perspectivism, raised as a problem by the positivists. Simmel explored the concept of Verstehen from a critique of the mechanistic view, circumscribed by historical realism and influenced by naturalist and positivist assumptions. In addition, his Verstehen underwent conceptual modifications, which can be compared by dividing the whole of the Simmelian work into two great epistemic moments: Idealist and Vitalist. Given this division, and bearing in mind the problem of objectivity and perspectivism, the present investigation is delineated from three initial hypotheses. The first is precisely the existence of different conceptual frameworks in Simmel, which demonstrate a mature and increasingly preoccupied intellectual progression in explaining the nature of Verstehen and how it functions. This hypothesis contributes as much to the epistemological discussion of the sciences, as to the best use of the author, or of his philosophical or sociological writings. The second hypothesis refers specifically to the concept of Verstehen, admitting the existence of two notions of Verstehen, each connected to one of the periods. In the Idealist phase, Simmel seems to have a more methodological concern about Verstehen. In the Vitalist phase, the Simmelian Verstehen emerges as the fundamental relationship between individuals, that is, something beyond a methodological concept. In general, the notion of Verstehen loses the direct link with projected representation, and becomes directly linked to the notion of life as a fundamental relation between human beings. Finally, the third hypothesis is linked to the Vitalist period and is premised on the perspectivism as necessary for scientific knowledge. With the intellectual development of the Simmelian work, perspectivism ceases to be a problem and becomes a condition of human inquiry, a condition that should be accepted resulting in greater scientific knowledge of social reality. Finally, there are guidelines for future investigations.

Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2017-03-13T15:11:39Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Ana Cecília Soares Carvalho - 2016.pdf: 1965163 bytes, checksum: f9166047fb6b1ebe647f0531e32e63ac (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-03-20T12:01:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Ana Cecília Soares Carvalho - 2016.pdf: 1965163 bytes, checksum: f9166047fb6b1ebe647f0531e32e63ac (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-20T12:01:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Ana Cecília Soares Carvalho - 2016.pdf: 1965163 bytes, checksum: f9166047fb6b1ebe647f0531e32e63ac (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-10-18 / This research aims to analyze whether the content of sociology have connections with the working themes of disciplines of History and Geography (Elementary School). Starting from concept that education aims (or should aim) an integral formation of citizens, providing knowledge and reflections so that student can understand the context in which he lives, and thus transform it; we think of as the most humanistic/reflective training has been conducted in schools, especially in Elementary School and High School. For our study, the Human Sciences of Elementary School has represented here by disciplines: History and Geography, and we analyze the possibilities of these two areas of knowledge and their possible connections/interconnections with sociology. For this, we evaluated official documents and textbooks for better understand how the Social Sciences field contents has worked with our children and youth; and what are the contributions of the sociology as a discipline in the Elementary School curriculum. In our analysis we noticed some mismatches between the goals set for the History and Geography, and how these disciplines are shown in the reality work in schools, punctuating also, the intentions and interests that permeate the critical and reflexive work in schools. Faced with this scenario, we present discussions on the importance of the Human Sciences in education, the contributions and work opportunities between the History, Geography and Sociology. / A presente pesquisa tem o objetivo de analisar se os conteúdos/saberes da sociologia possuem conexões com os temas de trabalho das disciplinas de História e Geografia do Ensino Fundamental. Partindo da concepção de que a educação visa (ou deveria visar) uma formação integral do cidadão, proporcionando conhecimentos e reflexões para que o educando possa compreender o contexto em que vive, e assim, transformá-lo; pensamos em como a formação mais humanística/reflexiva tem sido realizada nas escolas, sobretudo na Educação Básica. Para esse estudo, a Ciências Humanas do Ensino Fundamental está aqui representada pelas disciplinas de História e Geografia; e analisamos as possibilidades destas duas áreas de conhecimento e suas possíveis conexões e interligações com a sociologia. Para isso, avaliamos documentos oficiais e Livros Didáticos para melhor compreender como os conteúdos da área das Ciências Humanas têm sido trabalhados com as crianças e jovens; e quais as possibilidades de contribuição da sociologia enquanto disciplina no currículo do Ensino Fundamental. Em nossa análise notamos alguns descompassos entre os objetivos traçados para a História e a Geografia, e a forma como essas disciplinas se apresentam na realidade do trabalho nas escolas, pontuando também, as intencionalidades e interesses que permeiam e cerceiam o trabalho crítico e reflexivo nas escolas. Diante deste cenário, apresentamos discussões sobre a importância das Ciências Humanas na educação, as contribuições e possibilidades de trabalho entre a História, a Geografia e a Sociologia.

La disparité est forte entre les secteurs d’activité des ingénieurs autant qu’entre leurs formations, ces dernières étant caractérisées par un ancrage sociohistorique ayant minoré dans les curricula certains savoirs développés par les SHS. Or, les enjeux de l’intégration des SHS dans la formation des ingénieurs sont avérés. C’est pourquoi, la recherche présentée vise à identifier les disciplines de SHS introduites dans ces formations et les buts qu’elles poursuivent. Il s’agit de comprendre en quoi et comment les SHS participent d’une réflexivité sur les enjeux démocratiques des conditions d’exercice des fonctions d’ingénierie ou au contraire de la légitimation d’une pensée technocratique. Dans une première étape, l’enquête a porté sur la manière dont les sites internet des Écoles présentent les enseignements de SHS, les départements les regroupant et les recherches associées, ainsi que sur les textes de présentation des formations. Les résultats permettent de rendre compte d’une interdépendance entre ces affichages de SHS et des orientations culturelles technoscientifiques des Écoles, déterminées en partie par leur tutelle, date de création, domaine de spécialité et niveau de recrutement. Cette analyse permet également de montrer en quoi ces orientations sont en lien avec le processus ’institutionnalisation des SHS en France. En synthèse, une catégorisation des Écoles est proposée ; elle met en valeur le fait que si la référence à l’entreprise est permanente, les SHS quant à elles ne sont mobilisées que dans deux catégories sur six et ne sont articulées aux sciences et techniques de spécialité des ingénieurs (STSI) que dans une seule catégorie. Des études de cas contrastées illustrent et approfondissent ces premiers résultats à partir de données empiriques. Si la coexistence des SHS et des STSI semble difficile, elle est néanmoins possible en des termes qui répondent aux enjeux contemporains des métiers de l’ingénierie, comme le montre l’analyse d’une École dont les pionniers, portés par une ambition philosophique et politique, par des valeurs personnelles et des convictions partagées ont été soutenus par les politiques nationales de recherche en SHS. / The disparity between activity sectors for engineers is as great as that between their vocational training programs. But the latter are characterized by their sociohistorical basis that typically minimizes some consideration of khowledge acquired by HSS from their curriculum. Whereas the importance of the integration HSS in engineering education has been confirmed. That is why this present research aims at identifying the disciplines of HSS introduced into these trainings and the purposes which they pursue. It is a question of understanding in what and how the HSS participate in a reflexivity on the democratic stakes in the conditions of exercise of engineering practice or unlike the legitimization of a technocratic direction. The investigation first examined the display on the websites of the schools of HSS disciplines, their departments listed that include this subject in their teaching and research programs, and the texts describing their content. This investigation reveal an interdependence between these displays of HSS and cultural technoscientifics orientations of the engineering schools, partially determined by their supervision, date of creation, domain of speciality and level of recruitment. It shows howtheses orientations are linked with the institutionalization of the HSS in France. A categorization of schools was also elaborated, on the basis of the place and of the function which is occupied by the SHS in their curriculum. The dominant reference to the company in the program contrasts with HSS which are explicitly mobilized only in two categories of six, and are connected to the sciences and the techniques of engineering speciality only in one category. Studies of contrasted cases illustrate and go deeper into these first results. How difficult seams this coexistence, it is possible as shown by the analysis of a school among which the pioneering fouders boosted by their philosophic and political ambition, their personal values and shared convictions were also supprted by the national policies of research in HSS.

M.A. (Linguistics) / Unlike in the natural sciences, the study fields of the social sciences are closely related and large areas overlap - with regard to the use of terminology as well. However there are also differences, and in an institution such as the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) which comprises a heterogeneous community of subject specialists, not only the different subjects fields are represented, but also the different schools of thought (universities). In order to conduct human sciences research, the subject specialists should communicate with one another within these subject fields, but also across the borders of the different human sciences disciplines. The aim of this study was to standardize selected human sciences terminology used in the HSRC in order to provide a source of such terminology to be used mainly by HSRC personnel, and to enhance communication in this way. A theoretical review of the fields of standardization and sUbject lexicography was given. The former field was subdivided into linguistic standardization, technical language standardization and organizational standardization, and a clear organizational standardization process was distinguished on the basis of the steps of collecting, submitting, processing and distributing terminology. The field of subject lexicography concerned technical dictionaries and terminology lists, and the issue of computerizing terminology was also dealt with. The organizational standardization process with respect to HSRC terminology was explained and problematic terms identified in the study were discussed. The terminology involved in the study had been collected over a number of years by the language practitioners at the Centre for Language Services eCLS) of the HSRC, recorded on cards and later entered into the computer. In the study the terminology was submitted to the various sUbject specialists in the HSRC for their comment and approval, and their comments were subsequently researched and discussed by the CLS. The next step in the standardization process involves the processing of the comments so that the terminology can be distributed in the form of a publication or by means of a computerized database. The use of standardized terminology in the HSRC can contribute greatly towards improving communication between subject specialists and if the computerized information is transferred to the National Term Bank of the National Terminology Services as planned, the standardized HSRC terminology can be of use outside the HSRC as well.

[pt] Este ensaio tem por objeto os temas da representação e da narratividade nas ciências humanas, a partir de uma comparação com o campo da teoria da arte. A hipótese aqui apresentada é a de que a noção clássica de mímesis, que por muito tempo serviu de suporte para a teoria de representação, experimenta uma crise de seus fundamentos ao longo dos séculos XIX e XX. Após uma série de intervenções teóricas - dentre as quais destaco a contribuição do romantismo, a perspectiva da antropologia social e a linguística – o paradigma mimético perde sua força em favor de uma teoria da representação centrada na dimensão da linguagem. Meu objetivo é analisar as consequências desta mudança epistemológica sobre o regime discursivo que separou a literatura e as ciências humanas em campos opostos. Assim, pretendo demonstrar que o princípio científico de rejeição da poiésis obedece a uma concepção obsoleta da linguagem, segundo a qual empiria e poética são consideradas ameaças mútuas. / [en] The object of study in this research is the topics of representation and narrativity in the human sciences, starting from a comparison with the field of the theory of art. The hypothesis proposed here is that the classic notion of mimesis, which supported the theory of representation for a long time, went through a crisis with regards to its theoretical bases during the 19th and 20th centuries. After a series of theoretical interventions – in which I highlight the importance of romanticism, the perspective of social anthropology and linguistics – the mimetic paradigm loses its strength in favor of a theory of representation focusing on the dimension of language. My objective is to analyse the consequences this epistemological change has for the discursive regime that separated literature and the human sciences into opposite fields. As such, I intend to demonstrate that the scientific principle of rejecting poiesis obeys an obsolete conception of language, in which empiria and poetics are considered mutual threats.

Magister Public Health - MPH / Background: Childhood obesity is on the rise in South Africa (SA) and child-directed marketing (CDM) is one of the contributing factors to children’s unhealthy food choices and consumption. This study assessed CDM on pre-packaged breakfast cereals available in South African supermarkets and describe the nutrient composition of these pre-packaged products. Methods: A descriptive observational study of CDM on pre-packaged breakfast cereals was undertaken with quantitative analysis of the nutrient composition of these products. Secondary data from the “Researching obesogenic food environments in South Africa and Ghana” study in 2019 was examined. An independently reviewed codebook of definitions of CDM was developed and breakfast cereals were assessed to identify CDM. The CDM questionnaire was developed in REDCap, an online research database and data captured therein. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for cross tabulations and one-way ANOVAs. All analysis with p value < 0.05 was taken as significant.