Although digital equity is a recognized challenge in our K-12 school system, there is little research in using a holistic framework to investigate pre-conditions necessary for K-12 students to participate in digital learning and online processes. A conceptual framework of students' digital opportunity (SDO) is developed to represent the essential components of digital connectivity. The four key components are broadband internet availability, broadband usage, digital device ownership, and speed quality. A composite measure of SDO was created to quantitatively represent and measure the differences across 3,138 counties in the United States. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation was applied to evaluate if the distribution of the SDO score is associated with geographical characteristics at the county level. The result showed the presence of significant county-level clusters with concentrations of high or low SDO scores. While the spatial analysis provided evidence of where the gaps in digital opportunities are located, there are underlying factors at the micro level that would need further investigation. This study suggests a collective approach between private and public entities to address the K-12 digital equity issue. The necessary conditions presented in the SDO model must be addressed first in order to bring change to K-12 students and schools in terms of obtaining high quality and reliable broadband internet and digital devices for learning with technology. Two research outputs are available from this research to allow others to further evaluate digital equity among K-12 schools and students.

Following school closures in the spring semester of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, school districts across the United States began making plans for a remote start to the 2020-2021 school year. In Texas, professional development plans were required by the Texas Education Agency for K-12 public school districts planning to provide online learning options for students. This study examined these professional development plans using directed qualitative content analysis methods to identify and categorize the learning experiences provided to educators in preparation for online instruction. The plans were coded in NVivo using etic codes based on relevant literature related to the TPACK framework, online teacher competencies, and standards for quality online teaching. Emic codes were created as needed during the iterative coding process. Data analysis revealed trends related to teacher training gaps, district priorities, target audiences, and the occurrence of professional development sessions. The study findings were discussed, and suggestions were made to inform the development and design of future professional development plans for online teachers at multiple levels. Recommendations for further research specific to in-service teacher professional development and preservice teacher preparation programs were offered.

This mixed-methods study investigated the factors that impact K–12 teachers' perceived self-efficacy, attitudes, and beliefs regarding the implementation of problem-based learning (PBL), with a specific focus on the influences within a K–11 schoolwide setting. The first part of the study analyzed 21 responses to the pre- and post- Teacher PBL Self-Efficacy, Attitude, and Implementation Questionnaires; the second part analyzed three individual teachers’ interview responses gathered during one-on-one Zoom interviews with the researcher. The quantitative data questionnaires covered relationships between teachers’ perceived attitudes and beliefs, self-efficacy, and implementation of problem-based learning. Findings showed that there was a statistically significant relationship between teachers’ attitudes and beliefs towards PBL from the pre- to post- questionnaires. The findings also showed that there were no statistically significant relationships found between teachers’ self-efficacy and implementation from the pre- and post- questionnaires. The qualitative data was gathered from the open-ended responses on the pre- and post- questionnaires, as well as three individual teacher interviews. The qualitative findings included a total of 12 themes that emerged from the data: 1) PBL is Rewarding and Engaging, 2) PBL is Challenging yet Rewarding, 3) Support, 4) Personal Significance, 5) Assessment, 6) Community Partners, 7) General PBL Knowledge, 8) Modeling PBL, 9) PBL Resources, 10) PBL Implementation, 11) Planning and Time Management, and 12) Teacher Collaboration. Recommendations were made for future research based on the quantitative and qualitative data in this study. These recommendations included investigating a similar schoolwide implementation of PBL with a larger sample size and modified research design, as well as investigating the perceived supports that were identified by the teachers in the study.

As a full-time Professor of Mathematics Education, as well as a part-time eighth grade (13 and 14 year olds) mathematics teacher, I have the opportunity to experience the teaching profession from “both sides of the fence.” My university courses are enhanced by my work in the field, while my eighth graders’ learning is strengthened by educational principles studied at the university. In this paper (and presentation), I will explain this partnership and the benefits to both audiences.

The major aims of this paper are to: present the background of the mathematics education problem in the Stamford Public School (SPS) district which is common is most U.S cities; explain the need for change in mathematics education; describe the process to systemically transform both the curriculum and instruction of mathematics thereby ensuring that each and every students is prepared for the 21st century, for higher education, and for success in a global society; and provide ways to measure these changes. The K-12 mathematics education reform model presented can be replicated in other cities and for other academic areas.

This mixed methods dissertation study explored how secondary school educators in specific K-12 competition programs recruited and deployed STEM professional volunteers. The study explored which practices were viewed as most important, and how practices related to constructivist pedagogy, all from the viewpoint of educators. The non-positivist approach sought new knowledge without pursuing generalized results. Review of the literature uncovered extensive anecdotal information about current practices, and suggested that large investments are made in engaging volunteers. One National Science Foundation-sponsored study was identified, and its recommendations for a sustained research agenda were advanced. Three study phases were performed, one to explore practices and operationalize definitions, a second to rate practice's importance and their relation to pedagogy, and a third to seek explanations. Educators preferred recruiting local, meaning recruiting parents and former students, versus from industry or other employers. Most educators preferred volunteers with mentoring skills, and placing them in direct contact with students, versus deploying volunteers to help with behind-the-scenes tasks supporting the educator. Relationships were identified between the highest-rated practices and constructivism in programs. In STEM professional volunteers, educators see affordances, in the same way a classroom tool opens affordances. A model is proposed which shows educators considering practicality, pedagogy, knowledge and skills, and rapport when accessing the affordances opened by STEM professional volunteers. Benefits are maximized when programs align with strong industry clusters in the community.

The major aims of this paper are to: present the background of the mathematics education problem in the Stamford Public School (SPS) district which is common is most U.S cities; explain the need for change in mathematics education; describe the process to systemically transform both the curriculum and instruction of mathematics thereby ensuring that each and every students is prepared for the 21st century, for higher education, and for success in a global society; and provide ways to measure these changes. The K-12 mathematics education reform model presented can be replicated in other cities and for other academic areas.

Recent research have been focusing on supporting teachers in the classroom. Such support has been shown to benefit from the development and employment of teacher-facing analytic dashboards to help them to make fast and effective decisions in regard to the in-class student learning activities. The evolving interest in this field has facilitated the emergence of the Teaching Analytics area of practice and research. However, current research efforts have indicated that the use of such dashboards usually adds another layer to the already dynamic and complex situation for teachers, which can divert their attention and can often be experienced as a disturbing factor in the class. Therefore, it is highly important to examine how such teacher-facing dashboards can be improved from the user experience perspective, in a way that would allow teachers to grasp student learning activities easily and with good perceived usability. The aim of this study is to understand how we can better design teacher-facing dashboards to more adequately support K-12 teachers in their decisions that would provide relevant in-time and student support. The study applies Nielsen's three-round iterative design approach to understand the existing usability problems and further develop the dashboard, originally designed by the company. In order to investigate users’ perceived attitude towards the redesigned dashboard, the final prototype has been evaluated through a Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with nine participants. As a result, the redesigned teacher-faced dashboard was proven to have a high potential to support teachers’ decisions. The efficiency of the Technology Acceptance Model was verified and put into general context on how tools for teachers should be designed for the usage in the classroom. Additionally, some major challenges for teachers with using external tools during class were discovered and are discussed in the context of a newly designed dashboard. / Befintlig forskning stödjer lärare i klassrummet genom att utveckla analytiska visualiseringsverktyg (a.k.a. dashboards) som lärare kan använda för att fatta snabba och effektiva beslut med avseende på elevernas läraktiviteter. Det växande intresset för detta område har lett till framväxten av Teaching Analytics-fältet inom praktik och forskning. Forskning har dock visat att användandet av dessa verktyg vanligtvis lägger till ytterligare ett lager till den redan dynamiska och komplexa situationen för lärare, vilket kan avleda deras uppmärksamhet och ofta fungera som en störande faktor i klassrummet. Därför är det mycket viktigt att undersöka hur sådana visualiseringsverktyg för lärare kan förbättras ur användarperspektiv, på ett sätt som skulle göra det möjligt för lärare att förstå elevernas läraktiviteter enkelt och med god upplevd användbarhet. Syftet med denna studie är att förbättra användargränssnittet för ett befintligt, så att det på ett mer adekvat sätt kan stödja lärare i sina beslut och erbjuda relevant stöd till eleverna. Studien tillämpar Nielsens tre-rundors iterativa designmetod för att förstå de befintliga användbarhetsproblemen och vidareutveckla en existerande dashboard, ursprungligen utvecklad av företaget. För att undersöka användarnas inställning till det omdesignade verktyget har den slutliga prototypen utvärderats genom ett frågeformulär och semistrukturerade intervjuer med nio deltagare. Resultat visar att det omdesignade de verktyget har en stor potential för att stödja lärarnas beslut i klassrummet. Effektiviteten för Teknik Acceptant Modellen (TAM) verifieras och sattes i allmän kontext för hur olika verktyg för lärare bör utformas för användning i klassrummet. Dessutom diskuteras lärarnas stora utmaningar med att använda externa verktyg under lektioner i samband med ny verktyget.

The use of data to drive or inform the decision making process is gaining traction in education. In response to the data driven decision making shift, an emerging group of scholars are beginning to discuss how the data movement in education may be viewed using a critical race theory (CRT) framework. With a focus on implications for racial equity, this study explores the ways and to what degree data are valued or practically applied in the decision making process in Manitoba. Participants for this qualitative research study include ten Manitoban school superintendents. Drawing attention to the ways in which data-driven practices like all other practice in education, are not neutral acts, this study looks to contribute to the growing research area on Canadian data-driven decision making and CRT. Findings from this study indicate that school divisions in the province of Manitoba are increasingly driven by data that privileges Western or colonial ways of knowing. Some recommendations for further research include, using achievement data to resist racial oppression, exploring the dangers of Gap Talk, and looking at whether data literacy includes notions of power and privilege. / February 2017

This museum thesis project will provide an overview of kindergarten through 12th-grade (K-12) educational programs at six non-collecting art institutions within the United States, contextualized within a selected historiography of art museum education. This project is designed to aid the Virginia Commonwealth University Institute for Contemporary Art (ICA). The ICA is a non-collecting institution that will be located on VCU’s Monroe Park campus. As the ICA staff sets out to articulate a vision and scope for its K-12 education programs, it will benefit from the information offered in this thesis project, especially given that there is no existing literature specifically about K-12 programs at non-collecting museums of contemporary art.