S'estudia l'obra filològica d' Antoni de Bastero i Lledó (1675-1737), des d'una perspectiva de conjunt, per tal de concretar I'activitat d'aquest estudiós en els camps de la lingüística, la filologia o la crítica literària, i fer-ne una valoració adequada als coneixements actuals sobre I'exercici d'aquestes disciplines durant la primera meitat del segle XVIII. La tesi inclou un estudi biogràfic, absolutament necessari per establir moltes de les circumstancies vitals del canonge Bastero, que ens resultaven obscures i que són decisives per explicar el propi interès per la filologia, les relacions amb determinats cercles acadèmics, la datació aproximada dels diversos projectes iniciats, la interpretació correcta de la seva activitat. S'inclou, així mateix, un catàleg exhaustiu de tots els manuscrits conservats d'Antoni de Bastero i que tenen alguna relació amb el seu treball filològic. En total es tenen en compte 69 volums manuscrits, actualment escampats per diversos arxius i biblioteques de Barcelona i Girona, alguns dels quals eren fins ara desconeguts. D'aquests 69 volums, 48 contenen pròpiament obres de Bastero o altres materials publicables, i la resta són materials de treball. En conseqüència, l' obra filològica del canonge es pot concretar en: la producció d'una gramàtica italiana i d'una gramàtica francesa, en català, que va deixar inacabades; la realització de La Crusca provenzale, un magne diccionari etimològic i d'autoritats que recull una gran quantitat d'hipotètics provençalismes italians -només es va publicar el primer volum d'aquesta obra a Roma, l'any 1724, però n'he localitzat pràcticament tot el contingut; l'elaboració d'una extensa antologia de poesies trobadoresques, copiades amb gran rigor d'alguns còdexs de la Biblioteca Vaticana; el plantejament d'una Història de llengua catalana, que havia de ser una gran compilació dels mèrits i les excel·lències d'aquesta llengua -que l'autor identifica amb la provençal- i la seva literatura, i que es va poder desenvolupar nomes de forma parcial. Precisament, la part central de la tesi l'ocupa l'estudi particular i l'edició crítica de les parts redactades d'aquesta obra, que suposa la concreció de la particular percepció lingüística i literària que Bastero havia anat perfilant al llarg dels seus anys d'estudi. Es tracta d'una edició molt complexa, perquè l'obra ens ha arribat només en un esborrany, que presenta múltiples correccions i esmenes i evidencia diferents estadis redaccionals; els manuscrits inclouen, així mateix, nombrosos papers amb anotacions o fragments que, o no pertanyen al cos de l'obra, o bé s'han hagut de resituar en el lloc que els correspon. EI resultat és, tanmateix, un text prou coherent que comprèn quasi la totalitat del Llibre primer -sobre l'origen, el naixement i els diversos noms de la llengua, i sobre el nom de Catalunya- i un capítol del Llibre tercer -sobre la primitiva extensió del català per tot Espanya. EI més rellevant d'aquesta obra és el fet que s'hi basteix una original teoria sobre la formació de les diverses llengües romàniques que té el català com a eix central -proposa la identificació del català provençal amb la lingua romana dels documents alt medievals, en una operació que s'avança quasi cent anys a François Raynouard, que propugnava això mateix, referint-se nomes al provençal, amb un àmplia aprovació de la comunitat científica del seu temps. Destaquen també un excepcional rigor històric i documental, i una notable sensibilitat vers l'oralitat lingüística, que és objecte d'algunes anotacions ben interessants. Tanquen la tesi un seguit d'annexos documentals on es transcriuen diversos documents relacionats amb els aspectes tractats anteriorment. / The philological works of Antoni de Bastero i Lledó (1675-1737) are studied from the perspective of the whole, in order to specify this scholar's studies in the fields of linguistics, philology and literary criticism, and to make an evaluation based on the knowledge of the day in regards to the exercise of these disciplines during the first half of 17th century. The thesis includes a biographical study, absolutely necessary in order to establish the many vital circumstances surrounding Bastero, which were unclear yet decisive in the explanation of his own interest in philology, in his relationships with specific academic circles, in the approximate dating of his varied initial projects and in the correct interpretation of his activities. Included, also, is an exhaustive catalogue of all of Antoni de Bastero's conserved manuscripts which bear any relevance to his philological work. In total there are sixty-nine series of manuscripts scattered in different archives and libraries in Barcelona and Girona, some of which were unknown until now. Of these sixty-nine volumes, forty-eight contain works attributed to Bastero or other publishable material. The rest are working drafts. Consequently, the Canon's philological works can be specified as: the production of both an Italian and French grammar, in Catalan, which were left unfinished; the completion of La Crusca provenzale, a grand etymological and authoritative dictionary which brings together a large number of hypothetical Italian Provençalisms -only the first volume of this work was published in Rome in I724 although we have located almost the entire contents; the elaboration of an extended anthology of troubadour poetry, copied with great rigor from codices found in the Vatican library; the consideration of a Historia de la llengua catana, which was to be a great compilation of the merits and excellencies of this language -which the author identifies with Provençal- and its literature, and which was only partially completed. It is precisely the specific study and critical edition of these completed parts, which presumes the concretization of the particular linguistic and literary perceptions that Bastero was outlining throughout the many years of his studies, witch occupy the central theme of this thesis. The edition in question is quite complex, keeping in mind that this particular work was available only in its draft form, complete with multiple corrections, rectifications and evidence of differing sages of writing; the manuscripts include, in this manner, numerous annotated or fragmented papers which, either do not belong to the body of the text, or have been restored to their corresponding places in the text. The result is, nevertheless, a quite coherent text which comprises almost the entire First Book -regarding the origin, the birth and various names of the language, and regarding the name Catatonia- and a chapter of Book Three -regarding the early diffusion of Catalan throughout Spain. The most noteworthy aspect of this work is that it offers an original theory of the formation of the various Romance languages with Catalan as the centre axis - proposing the identification of Catalan-Provençal with the Iingua romana of late medieval documents, in an operation that precedes, by almost a hundred years, Francoise Raynouard, who proposes the same idea, but with reference only to Provençal, and was highly supported by the scientific community of his day. His exceptional documentational and historical rigor and a notable sensitivity to linguistic orality are also noteworthy and make for some very interesting annotations. The thesis ends with a series of annexed documentation with the transcriptions of various documents related to previously discussed aspects.

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

The aim of this thesis is to shed light on language variation and language change in judicial protocols from the municipal court in Stockholm during the period 1476−1626. These documents provide a unique insight into late medieval and early modern use of written vernacular. The main material consists of 700 courtroom notes from seven different periods of time, a hundred documents from each year: 1476, 1499, 1525, 1550, 1575, 1600, and 1626. The study draws theoretically on functional linguistics; more specifically, it utilizes Halliday’s systemic-functional grammar, Ulf Teleman’s (1985) theoretical model of language change, as well as dialogism. The results are presented in four analytical chapters. In the first of these, the aim is to systemize the somewhat heterogeneous material, and the corpus is divided in two different ways: one due to judicial content (‘categories of matter’), and one due to textual structure (‘discourse levels’). These systemizations also serve as a methodological foundation for the lexicogrammatical analysis in the following chapters. A main result is that multi-party cases over time develop a functional need for new communication strategies, while unilateral cases already from the beginning seem to bear a more deep-rooted textual stability. In addition, there is a significant increase of discourse level 3, representing communicative events outside the courtroom, in multi-party cases found in texts from 1600 and 1626. In the two following chapters, lexicogrammatical resources of ‘personal reference’ and ‘time and tense’ are analysed. The texts realize different patterns of anaphora, where individuation explains much of the variation: texts with high degree of individuation (criminal cases) materialize a high degree of pronouns, whereas texts regarding property issues materialize low individuation with few pronouns and many full NPs. Regarding the use of tense, the past tense is the most common tense. Still, the study shows an diachronic increase in the use of present tense. The last analytical chapter examines the use of three lexical features: judicial pronouns; word pairs; and nominalizations. The results show that judicial pronouns and word pairs typically occur in registrations matters; nominalizations occur throughout the genre. In the last chapter, the results and implications of the thesis are summated and discussed. The results point towards a pragmatic use of the written language. Although the lexicogrammatical resources are the same during the period, the usages vary. Hence, linguistic variation and change are highly motivated by an intercommunion of contextual factors such as a more solid administrative literacy, a changing litigation, and an increase of legal demands for linguistic precision and documentation. It is argued that the language variety in the genre can be understood as instantiations of different registers.

This project uses corpus linguistics and geostatistics to test the sociolinguistic typological theory put forward by Peter Trudgill on the history of Norwegian. The theory includes several effects of societal factors on language change. Most discussed is the proposal that ‘intensive’ language contact causes simplification of language grammar. In the Norwegian case, the claim is that simplificatory changes which affected all of the Continental North Germanic languages (Danish, Swedish, Norwegian) but not the Insular North Germanic Languages were the result of contact with Middle Low German through the Hanseatic League. This suggests that those simplificatory changes arose in the centres of contact with the Hanseatic League: cities with Hansa trading posts and kontors. The size of the dataset required would have made it impossible for previous scholars to test this prediction, but digital approaches render the problem tractable. I have designed a 3.5m word corpus containing nearly all extant Middle Norwegian, and developed statistical methods for examining the spread of language phenomena in time and space. The project is made up of a series of case studies of changes. Three examine simplifying phonological changes: the rise of svarabhakti (epenthetic) vowels, the change of /hv/ > /kv/ and the loss of the voiceless dental fricative. A further three look at simplifying morphological changes: the loss of 1.sg. verbal agreement, the loss of lexical genitives and the loss of 1.pl. verbal agreement. In each case study a large dataset from many documents is collected and used to map the progression of the change in space and time. The social background of document signatories is also used to map the progression of the change through different social groups. A variety of different patterns emerge for the different changes examined. Some changes spread by contagious diffusion, but many spread by hierarchical diffusion, jumping first between cities before spreading to the country at large. One common theme which runs through much of the findings is that dialect contact within the North Germanic language area seems to have played a major role: many of the different simplificatory changes may first have spread into Norwegian from Swedish or Danish. Although these findings do not exactly match the simple predictions originally proposed from the sociolinguistic typological theory, they are potentially consistent with a more nuanced account in which the major centres of contact and so simplifying change were in Sweden and Denmark rather than Norway.

1 Abstract This thesis deals with a handwritten manuscript from the turn of the 18th century called Cžerneg Honza a neb. w Starim zbořenim Zámku Raďiňie. Nad Plzencem Zaklený Kolomaznjk and which elaborates a myth about the Radyně castle from the Pilsen region in the short-story-form. The first part presents a transliterated edition of the text by preserving the original orthography. The second part of the thesis analyses the orthography of the manuscript by building upon the preceding section. It focuses on the structure of the text, punctuation, spelling of consonants and vowels and briefly mentions rare ways of writing proper nouns and the use of capital letters. The analysis situates the orthography of the manuscript into a certain time period and, in the end, it establishes whether the manuscript belongs to the printers' or the scribal orthography. Alternatively, it evaluates whether the written orthography tends to resemble the printers' orthography. In the third section, the transcribed edition of the manuscript is introduced, using the current orthography. This edition makes the text accessible to a broader circle of contemporary readers. Apart from the transcription rules and the list of emendations, the editorial apparatus also incorporates a vocabulary with words, which could possibly be...

Die Arbeit behandelt die beiden Übersetzungsversionen des Lukasevangeliums ins Caló, die George Borrow 1837 und 1872 anfertigte. Sie hat mehrere Zielstellungen. Der erste Teil geht der Frage nach: Wie kam es zu den beiden Schriften? Er legt dar, welche Einflussfaktoren das authentische Caló im Spanien der 1830er Jahre herausgeprägt haben konnten und welche Einflüsse durch den Übersetzer George Borrow auf die Übersetzungen wirkten. Als extralinguistische Faktoren wird dafür die (Kultur-)Geschichte der Gitanos herangezogen, werden Borrows Biographie sowie seine Sprachkenntnisse untersucht und werden die Aufsätze namhafter Autoren über die Entstehung des Calós diskutiert und gegeneinander abgewogen. So entsteht zum ersten Mal eine komplexe Zusammenfassung der Vorgeschichte des Calós der Evangelien. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist einerseits eine Anleitung, die das Caló anhand von Textbeispielen für Hispanisten lesbar macht, und prüft andererseits, ob und wie die Aussage zutrifft, dass Borrows Purifizierungsbestrebungen in der zweiten Übersetzungsversion ein Caló schufen, das einen wesentlich geringeren Anteil an spanischer Sprache hat als in der ersten Version. Die Frage nach der Purifizierung erscheint vor dem Hintergrund der damaligen verklärenden Zigeunermode, der Afición, in Spanien sowie angesichts des Polyglotten Borrow bedeutsam. Um ihr nachzugehen, werden die ersten siebeneinhalb Kapitel beider Übersetzungen mit Hilfe von Textanalyseprogrammen wortartenspezifisch untersucht. Das Ergebnis bestätigt die Annahme bei zehn von sechzehn Wortarten und zeigt auf, dass besonders bei den Autosemantika Purifizierungsversuche unternommen wurden. Wahrscheinlich war aber schon die erste Übersetzungsversion purifiziert. Die Arbeit liefert einen ersten detaillierten linguistischen Vergleich eines Teiles der beiden Versionen und stellt das Caló der Evangelien in einem sehr umfassenden Kontext vor, wodurch sich eine Vernetzung linguistischer, kulturwissenschaftlicher und literaturwissenschaftlich interessanter Aspekte ergibt.:o. Vorwort & Danksagung i. Einleitung i.i. Begriffsbestimmung i.ii. Zielsetzung der Arbeit Teil I: Die Ursachen der Sprachinterferenz in den Lukasevangelien I.1. Die Geschichte der Gitanos bis ins 19. Jahrhundert I.1.1. Die prähispanische Phase I.1.2. Die erste Phase von 1425 bis 1499 I.1.3. Die zweite Phase von 1499 bis 1783 I.1.4. Die dritte Phase im 19. Jahrhundert I.2. Die Genese des Calós bis ins 19. Jahrhundert I.2.1. Denkmäler des Calós vor den Evangelien I.2.2. Die Debatte um die Genese des Calós I.2.2.1. Caló versus Pidgin-/ Kreolsprachen: Boretzky (1985) und Romero Yantorno I.2.2.2. Code-Switching, Pogadisierung, Geheimsprachen und Language Intertwining: Bakker & van der Voort (1991) I.2.2.3. Archaismen, kryptische Formationen, andalusische Merkmale und unabhängige Lexikentwicklung: Bakker (1995) I.2.2.4. Das katalonische Romaní als Indiz für die zeitliche Einordnung: Boretzky (1992) I.2.2.5. Das Caló als Alltagssprache und im Vergleich mit anderen Romaní-Dialekten: Boretzky (1998) I.2.2.6. Von der Alltagssprache zum geheimsprachlichen Vokabular: Bakker (1998) I.2.2.7. Zusammenfassung der Debatte I.3. George Henry Borrow I.3.1. Kurzbiographie I.3.2. Borrows Romaní-, Spanisch- und Caló-Kenntnisse Teil II: Der Anteil des Spanischen in den Lukasevangelien II.1. Texterschließung für Hispanisten II.1.1. Wörterbücher II.1.2. Grammatik II.1.2.1. Caló-Deklinationssuffixe II.1.2.2. Caló-Hilfsverben II.1.3. Textausschnitte II.1.3.1. Textausschnitt 1: Titelseiten und Vorworte Borrows II.1.3.2. Textausschnitt 2: Lukas 15, 1 - 4 . II.2. Wortartenspezifische Analyse des Anteils des Spanischen II.2.1. Vorgehen II.2.2. Auswertung II.3. Schluss Anhänge Anhang 1: Vergleich des Anteils des Spanischen an den Lukasevangelien 1 - 8,25 auf Caló von 1837 und 1872 in wortartenspezifischen, systematisierten und kommentierten Wortfrequenzlisten A.1. Flektierbare Wortarten A.1.1. Die Artikel A.1.2. Die Substantive A.1.3. Die Eigennamen A.1.4. Die Pronomina A.1.4.1. Die Personal- und Reflexivpronomina A.1.4.2. Die Demonstrativpronomina A.1.4.3. Die Possesivpronomina A.1.4.4. Die Relativpronomina A.1.4.5. Die Indefinitpronomina A.1.5. Die Adjektiva A.1.6. Die Verba A.1.7. Die Numeralia A.2. Unflektierbare Wortarten A.2.1. Die Adverbien A.2.2. Die Präpositionen A.2.3. Die Interrogativa A.2.4. Die Konjunktionen A.2.5. Die Interjektionen Anhang 2: Paralleltexte: Die Lukasevangelien 1 - 8,25 auf Caló von 1837 und von 1872 und das spanische Lukasevangelium 1 - 8,25 übersetzt von Scío Abbildungsverzeichnis Quellenverzeichnis Tabellenverzeichnis