Il existe en France plus de 44 236 monuments historiques, dont la diversité des typologies architecturales s’est considérablement accrue ces dernières décennies (édifices industriels, constructions modernes, etc.). Cette diversification constitue cependant une perte de repère des critères discriminant les monuments à conserver. Cette thèse de doctorat s’intéresse donc aux processus de patrimonialisation et à la sélection des édifices à protéger. Précisément, cette étude porte sur le phénomène inverse, celui des annulations de protection, en France depuis 1990. La présente recherche vise à mettre en évidence les facteurs intrinsèques et extrinsèques des radiations de protection - en net accroissement, particulièrement dans les cœurs de ville - et permettre ainsi une réflexion sur l’évolution du patrimoine et des politiques de protection. / In France there are more than 44.236 listed buildings, whose diversity of architectural typolo-gies increased significantly these last decades (industrials buildings, modern constructions, etc.). However, this diversification will entail the loss of criteria specifying the monuments which are meant to be preserved. This doctoral thesis is thus focused on the processes of pat-rimonialisation and on selection rules of buildings considered for listing. To be precise, this study relates to the opposite fact: thereviews, the cancellations of protections and therefore the delisting of buildings, in France, since 1990. This research aims to highlight the intrinsic and extrinsic factors of delisting requests – a net increase, mostly in the city centres - and thus to get an overall picture of the situation on inheritance evolution and on process for listing or delisting.

La notion de monument historique – distincte de la notion de patrimoine – apparaît durant la Révolution française. La protection du patrimoine, dont les origines proviennent d’une réponse directe à la situation de crise révolutionnaire, s’organise lentement mais avec des principes forts pendant le XIXème siècle : un support associatif local très actif, une administration en gestation et un cadre théorique et légal en point de mire (la première loi de protection des monuments historiques étant votée en 1887). La recherche historique a toujours accordé une place importante au patrimoine, en particulier par le biais de l’histoire de l’art. En privilégiant l’entrée politique, un grand nombre d’historiens se sont penchés sur l’évolution des différentes branches du service des monuments historiques. D’autres ont effectué un remarquable travail épistémologique redéfinissant le concept de patrimoine, à l’orée de ses multiples ramifications, tout en répondant à cette pluralité en proposant une analyse pluridisciplinaire de la question. Notre étude s’inscrit dans ce constat d’un besoin de réintégrer la question patrimoniale à une analyse globalisante intégrant les objets, les discours et les acteurs en réifiant les objets patrimoniaux du discours qui les produit à travers le temps. L’objectif de cette étude est de comprendre comment le patrimoine, dans sa diversité, va être mis en valeur par les acteurs sociaux grâce à une analyse du discours qui le sous-tend. Nous suggérons que le patrimoine n’est pas plus intrumentalisé que les autres fabrications humaines. Le patrimoine est créé par des discours qui, à leur tour, créent de l’espace public. Donc le patrimoine est la rencontre de l’homme et de son environnement : thématique notamment développée par les spécialistes de l’environnement. / The designation of « monument historique » traces its roots to the French Revolution when the government appointed Alexandre Lenoir to specify and safeguard certain structures. The first classifications were given in the XIXth century by Prosper Mérimée, inspector-general of historical monuments with the support of local organizations and an administration (until the vote of 1887 law for the protection of the « monuments historiques »).This Specified Subject studies how and why ‘heritage’ became an omnipresent and defining feature of modern societies. When we examine the politics of heritage from a historical perspective, a complex picture emerges. The political, social, economic and cultural history of heritage illuminates the tensions between a longing for the past and the desire for progress, between regional and national identities. Our goal is to understand how and why heritage is enhanced by people – politics, social groups. We suggest that heritage isn’t exploited with speechs but it creates new kind of speechs with the help of social groups.

Main topic of this thesis is revitalization of parish house complex in Batelov in difficult situation after restitution of church property. Housing for elderly people is proposed as an economically viable use of complex. Form of newly designed building respects surrounding rural environment, value of nearby listed building of parish house and also needs of its future residents.

Master`s thesis solves technological processes rehabilitation of masonry reconstruction historically protected building. Describes the restoration of masonry using the electroosmotic system and by using helical reinforcement masonry of reinforcement, then it is also in this master`s thesis time and financial plan, site facilities and complementary features.

This thesis describes the construction development of residential real estate in the area of Brno - Stranice. It considers not only the description of the location and its history but also it describes the development of construction of the residential real estate in individual periods of time when the main attention is given to the period of the First Republic, in which the greatest construction development took place. Furthermore, this work describes the significant architectonic building works as well as the current construction and development of this location in the future. The main purpose of this thesis is to summarize the progress of the residential real estate construction in the location of Brno – Stranice since the beginning of the construction in the nineties of 19th century till present, when the construction is almost completed.

The aim of this study is to explore heritage processes within contemporary urban planning in Sweden, which is done through a single-case study. The point of departure for the study is the management of Havrekvarnen, an early modernist industrial building within an urban development area of Nacka, Sweden. Through parallel decisions by the County Administrative Board and the local Municipality in 2016, the building was firstly, listed with the strongest legal, cultural, and historical protection available, and secondly, the municipal urban regulations were changed so that the landowner was given permission to pursuit a reconstruction of the building, replicating its original appearance. As such the case constitutes a hitherto unique example of a listed future reconstruction in Sweden. The study examines how the process took place, focusing on actors and critical junctures involved in the execution and how the description of the building's heritage-values changed. The study uses a composite theoretical framework of authorized heritage discourse and actor network theory. To this an explaining-outcome process tracing is applied as method. Through a sequential process of collecting empirical data, in the form of archival records and interviews, the process was mapped through the conceptualization of a causal mechanism. The method had not previously been used in the field of art history and was chosen as such with a tentative approach. The study gives an extensive presentation of the legal and practical framework surrounding heritage processes within urban planning in Sweden, as well as puts the study within a local historical context. The results of the study show that within the observed case, a trade-off situation between authenticity and aesthetic historical values arose, caused by the poor technical condition of the building: the aesthetic values were deemed to take precedence in the assessment. The study also shows how antiquarian consultants have had a decisive influence on the process of legislative enabling of the reconstruction of Havrekvarnen. The research design’s use of process tracing to map heritage processes is thus deemed useful for future enquiries within the field of art history and heritage studies.