Révolution dans l’ordre juridique international pénal, le mandat d’arrêt européen a été la traduction, concrète, d’un espace judiciaire européen en matière pénale. La création du mandat d’arrêt européen est né du constat d’un décalage, dont tirait profit la criminalité : alors que la liberté de circulation des biens, des services et des personnes était devenue une réalité au sein de l’Union européenne, l’effet des décisions de justice, expression de la souveraineté étatique, restait confiné aux limites frontalières nationales de chaque Etat membre. Visant à remplacer le système classique d’extradition au sein de l’Union européenne, en imposant à chaque autorité judiciaire nationale de reconnaître, moyennant un contrôle minimum, une demande de remise émanant de l’autorité judiciaire d’un autre Etat membre, le mandat d’arrêt européen est la conséquence d’une volonté de coopération efficace, visant à apporter une réponse pénale, forte, à la criminalité. L’ « euromandat » a été la première application concrète du principe de reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions de justice. Pierre angulaire de la coopération pénale européenne, ce principe repose sur le préalable nécessaire et fondamental de confiance mutuelle que doivent s’accorder, entre eux, les Etats membres, quant au fonctionnement de leur système juridique pénal interne et à la qualité des décisions rendues par leurs juridictions respectives. Théoriquement, le principe de reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions de justice implique l’existence de véritables standards communs des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne, en ce sens que tous les Etats membres doivent assurer, de manière équivalente, le respect des libertés individuelles, des droits de l’homme et des garanties procédurales. Pourtant, en pratique, le mandat d’arrêt européen fait courir le risque, pour un Etat membre, de remettre une personne (y compris un national), aux autorités judiciaires d’un autre Etat membre, qui ne garantirait pas, effectivement, les droits fondamentaux, en général, et les droits de la défense, en particulier. / A Revolution in the international criminal legal order, the European arrest warrant was the concrete translation of a European judicial area for criminal issues. The European arrest warrant was created to close a loophole which benefitted criminals: while the free circulation of goods, services and people had become a reality within the European Union, the effect of legal decisions, the expression of a State’s sovereignty, remained confined to the national borders of each Member State. Aimed at replacing the classic extradition system within the European Union, by forcing each national judicial authority to recognise a request to surrender a suspect, from the judicial authority of another Member State, the European arrest warrant is the result of a desire for efficient cooperation, and is intended to send a strong message to criminals. The “Euro-warrant” was the first concrete application of the principal of mutual recognition of judicial decisions. The Cornerstone of the European criminal cooperation, this principal relies on the fundamental requirement of mutual trust between the Member States, with respect to the functioning of their internal criminal justice systems and the quality of the rulings made by their respective jurisdictions. Theoretically, the principal of mutual recognition of judicial decisions implies the existence of true common standards of fundamental rights in the European Union, in the sense that all the Member States must respect individual freedoms, human rights and procedural guarantees. However, in practice the European arrest warrant runs the risk of surrendering a person (including a national) to the judicial authorities of another Member State who do not effectively guarantee the fundamental rights in general and more specifically the right to defend oneself.

The economical and judicial cooperation that EU constitutes results in that there is an increasing amount of international disputes arising. These international disputes in turn result in questions concerning private international law. The principle of mutual trust is not only an important principle in the entire judicial cooperation but especially important in the area of private international law. The principle means that the member states have to trust each other and the different legal systems. The aim of the principle is to ensure a well functioning internal market that is permeated by free circulation and freedom of establishment. In order to achieve a well functioning internal market it is necessary that the member states trust each other. The development during the last years have resulted in that the recognition and enforcement have been and will be improved as well as simplified in the entire area of private international law. The question the author has in mind is if there will be a time when the EU and its member states are ready for full implementation of the principle of mutual trust. Such implementation would mean that the member states have to trust each other and the different legal systems completely and be willing to let go of the possibility to refuse to recognise and enforce judgments issued in other member states. The discussion in the paper leads to the conclusion that the author finds it unlikely that there will be such a time. This conclusion is based on the discussion of the development and the reasons behind it and also the situation of the EU today. The economical crisis within the union is also in an aspect likely to have an effect on whether or not member states are willing to trust each other’s legal systems. The result of this situation and the previous development in the area leads the author to the conclusion that it will probably be necessary to maintain some sort of safeguards in the future also, either by grounds for refusal or minimum standards.

In today’s society it is not uncommon for people to move across borders. We are more likely to work and study in other countries, initiate cross-border relationships, acquire property in other states and change our residence. Therefore it is not uncommon for a per-son to leave inheritance in several states. The laws of succession differ between countries which creates an uncertainty among the devisors when planning their successions. This un-certainty, to which court has jurisdiction and to which country’s law is applicable, is con-sidered as incompatible with the free movement of people and capital within the EU. Therefore, the EU regulation No 650/2012 has been introduced to reduce the uncertainty and enable the EU citizens to govern their successions in advance.The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the regulation solves the current problems regarding the court of jurisdiction and applicable law in cross-border situations concerning succession within the EU and how this regulation in these matters relate to third state. To answer the purpose of this paper the applicable law is studied from a problem-based per-spective. The sources of law is systematized, interpreted and defined in the paper with a descriptive method.The regulation states that the principle of domicile is to be used as a harmonizing principle both regarding jurisdiction and applicable law. The regulation however, does not provide a clear definition of the term domicile. The authors of this paper consider this to be a problem in the enforcement of the principle. The regulation has universal application, wherefore the court may have to apply another state’s law when judging the succession. In such situations it may, for several reasons, be difficult to maintain a high level of legal certainty. The regu-lation only binds the Member States but may still be beneficial in successions related to a third State. / I dagens samhälle är det vanligt att människor rör sig över landsgränserna. Gränsöverskri-dandeförhållanden inleds, allt fler personer arbetar och studerar utanför medborgarskaps-landet, de byter hemvist och förvärvar egendom i andra stater, vilket gör att det vid en per-sons bortgång inte är ovanligt att denne efterlämnar kvarlåtenskap i flera stater. Staters arvsrättsliga regler skiljer sig åt vilket skapar en osäkerhet hos arvlåtaren då denne ska pla-nera för sin kvarlåtenskap. Denna oförutsägbarhet, avseende främst vilken domstol som är behörig samt vilken lag som är tillämplig, har ansetts strida mot den fria rörligheten av människor och kapital inom EU. Därför har en EU-förordning, nr 650/2012 av den 4 juli 2012 om behörighet, tillämplig lag, erkännande och verkställighet av domar samt godkän-nande och verkställighet av officiella handlingar i samband med arv och om inrättandet av ett europeiskt arvsintyg, förhandlats fram för att minska osäkerheten och underlätta för EU:s medborgare att utforma sina arvsrättsliga förhållanden i förväg.Syftet med denna uppsats är att utreda huruvida förordning nr 650/2012 löser nuvarande problematik avseende domsrätts- och lagvalsfrågorna i gränsöverskridanade arvsituationer inom EU samt hur denna förordning i dessa frågor förhåller sig till tredjestat. För att be-svara syftet utreds gällande rätt ur en problemorienterad synvinkel. Rättskällorna systemati-seras och tolkas för att sedan framställas i uppsatsen med en deskriptiv metod.I förordningen anges hemvistprincipen som harmoniserande anknytningsprincip både av-seende domsrätt och lagval. Det anges dock ingen klar och tydlig definition av hemvistbe-greppet, vilket uppsatsförfattarna anser utgör ett problem vid tillämpningen av principen. Förordningen är universell varför den behöriga domstolen kan tvingas tillämpa en annan stats lag. I sådana situationer kan det av flera anledningar vara svårt att upprätthålla en hög rättsäkerhet. Förordningen binder endast unionens medlemsstater men kan ändå vara till fördel i arvsmål med anknytning till tredjestat.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

No description available.

Unstoppable development in every area of life which brings an innovative methods, implements and forms has been an inherent part of the evolution of society for a long time now. Accordingly, the field of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters with phased pressure on the integrating procedures within the framework of the European Union, with the development of international relations between the Member States, and with increased rate of criminal activity exceeding the implementation of free movement of persons within the European Union has been made to reflect introduction of new mechanisms. The main task of such mechanisms is repressing organised crime and cross-border criminal activities, and also protection of fundamental rights of individuals who are suspected of commiting an offence. One of these mechanisms is the European arrest warrant, relatively new legal instrument to which is my diploma work devoted to. This instrument of criminal law based on the principle of mutual recognitions in criminal matters represents not just a symbol of mutual confidence for the Member States reflecting in their systems of criminal justice, but also some achievement of philosophical purpose in integrating aspects or rather ambitions in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It is...

Cette recherche, inscrite dans le cadre du « vivre ensemble », consiste à identifier une relation entre construction de savoirs et reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs en situation d’apprentissage. Identifier cette relation nécessite de problématiser la place du sujet scolaire éducable au « vivre ensemble » et la didactique adaptée à cette éducabilité. Déterminée par un contexte d’apprentissage de plus en plus rationalisé, la place du sujet scolaire ne lui permet plus qu’un accès au savoir ayant perdu tout sens en dehors d’une efficience indispensable aux logiques économiques et technicistes. Une autre place peut-elle permettre un autre rapport au savoir, celle d’un sujet riche de sa complexité psychologique, sociale et émotionnelle ? Ces dimensions n’impliqueraient plutôt pas un apprentissage interactif autorisant des expériences émotionnelles susceptibles d’assurer les conditions d’une reconnaissance mutuelle dans l’apprendre ? La recherche de terrain porte sur une situation interactive de lecture compréhension d’albums par un groupe identique de six enfants sur les trois ans du cycle 2. L’entretien, mené par les professeurs respectifs, se réalise selon le guide d’entretien d’un questionnement. Ce dernier a pour but de favoriser l’interprétation par le canal d’expériences émotionnelles singulières et d’aider à transformer les informations narratives en significations morales ou idéologiques comme outil de l’action de l’élève. Les outils d’analyses portent sur l’identification de l’interface des expériences émotionnelles traduites par le verbal et le non verbal des co-énonciations et leur rôle dans la reconnaissance identification et la reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs. / The aim of this research, as part of the framework "Living Together", is to identify a relationship between the construction of knowledge and the mutual recognition of actors in a learning situation. To identify this relationship implies questioning not only the situation of the trainable school subject as to the framework "Living Together" but also the suitable didactics for this trainability. Due to an increasing rationalized learning context, the current situation only allows the school subject to acquire a knowledge which has lost all meaning beyond an efficiency dictated by economic and technical logics. Can there be a different approach to knowledge construction - that of a pupil complex and rich in psychological, social and emotional aspects? Should these dimensions not rather imply an interactive construction of knowledge, allowing for emotional experiences to ensure the conditions for mutual recognition in the learning process? The conducted field research has been based on interactive sessions of story reading to the same group of six children during three years of cycle #2. The interviews, conducted by the respective teachers, have been conducted according to the established guidelines for questioning. The purpose of the latter is to facilitate the interpretation through singular emotional experiences and to help transform narrative information into moral or ideological meanings, which can then be used as a tool by the school subject. The analytical tools focus on the identification of emotional experiences interface, through verbal and non-verbal exchanges, and their role in identity construction as well as mutual recognition of the stake holders.

La Traité de Maastricht a institué la citoyenneté européenne. Envisagée initialement comme une conséquence de la nationalité d’un État membre, la notion a connu un développement extraordinaire au travers d’interprétations ambitieuses de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne. Statut fondamental des ressortissants des États membres, la citoyenneté de l’Union se conjugue avec la liberté de circulation et les droits fondamentaux pour mettre à l’épreuve le statut personnel. Le temps est ainsi venu de s’interroger sur l’aptitude de la citoyenneté européenne à devenir le terreau d’un renouveau de la méthode du droit international privé au sein de l’Union européenne. La citoyenneté de l’Union constitue un fondement à la généralisation d’une méthode de reconnaissance mutuelle en bouleversant le statut personnel / The Maastricht Treaty establishes the European citizenship. Initially conceived as a consequence of Member State’s nationality, the concept has incredibly increased through ambitious exegesis analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Fundamental status of nationals of the member States, EU citizenship brings together and fundamental Rights to improve the personal status. Time has now come to find out if or not the European citizenship will becomes the spring of a new Private international law method for the European Union. European citizenship constitutes the substructure of the globalization of a mutual recognition method, overthrowing the personal status.