<p>Борба против најтежих облика прекограничног криминалитета захтевала је успостављање тешње сарадње између држава чланица Европске уније. У том циљу је установљен принцип узајамног признавања судских одлука, који се огледа у чињеници признавања и извршења страних судских одлука са што мање контроле и у кратком року, као да је у питању одлука домаћих правосудних органа. На основу овог принципа усвојен је велики број инструмената којима се остварује ближа сарадња парвосудних и полицијских органа држава чланица ЕУ и овај принцип операционализује у пракси.<br />Предмет докторске дисертације су управо ти савремени облици сарадње правосудних и полицијских органа у кривичним стварима на нивоу ЕУ који се реализују кроз примену принципа узајамног признавања и њихова усаглашеност са основним људским правима окривљеног лица. Предметна проблематика обухвата Европску унију, као територијални ентитет у оквиру којег је принцип узајамног признавања најразвијенији, кроз велики број инструмената који на њему почивају. Основни проблем који се јавља у вези са предметом дисертације је у успостављању баланса између потребе за безбедношћу и ефикасношћу кривичног поступка, ради којих је и установљен читав инструментаријум који ће се проучавати и међународно признатих људских права, која су у овом процесу занемарена, а све у циљу што веће сарадње и пуног међусобног поверења у кривичноправне системе држава чланица ЕУ.<br />Циљ истраживања предметне проблематике је настојањe да се укаже на досадашња достигнућа у овој области на нивоу ЕУ, идентификују проблеми који у овој области постоје, анализира положај окривљеног на нивоу ЕУ, стандарди заштите права окривљеног према Европској конвенцији о људским правима и пракси Европског суда за људска права. Као крајњи циљ жели се дати одговор на питање какав је положај окривљеног лица у поступцима пружања разних облика међународне правне помоћи у кривичним стварима на нивоу ЕУ у зависности од инструмената сарадње и да ли баланс између безбедности и заштите људских права на нивоу ЕУ постоји или како се може постићи.<br />VI<br />У раду је представљен принцип узајамног признавања и одабрана су четири инструмента која почивају на овом принципу, као типични представници: Европски налог за хапшење, Европски налог за спровођење истраге, Европски налог за вршење надзора и инструмент који регулише узајамно признавање мера пробације и алтернативних санкција. Анализом правних основа на којима почивају, стања имплементације у националним законодавствима и праксом примене, дошло се до сазнања о предностима и недостацима принципа узајамног признавања. Поред тога, уочен је велики пропуст твораца ових инструмената да заштите основна људска права окривљеног у кривичном поступку. Стога је приступљено анализи стања људских права окривљеног на нивоу ЕУ и могућих правних путева заштите права окривљеног у случају повреде права у поступку примене савремених облика институционалне сарадње у кривичним стварима. Осим ЕУ, нагласак је у раду стављен и на поступак пружања међународне правне помоћи у кривичним стварима по прописима Републике Србије и извршено је поређење са системом узајамног признавања који је на снази у ЕУ. У закључним разматрањима су изнети закључци спроведеног истраживања, предлози de lege ferenda за унапређење принципа узајамног признавања и положаја окривљеног на нивоу ЕУ, као и став о усаглашености потребе за ефикасношћу кривичног поступка на нивоу ЕУ и заштите основних људских права окривљеног.</p> / <p>Borba protiv najtežih oblika prekograničnog kriminaliteta zahtevala je uspostavljanje tešnje saradnje između država članica Evropske unije. U tom cilju je ustanovljen princip uzajamnog priznavanja sudskih odluka, koji se ogleda u činjenici priznavanja i izvršenja stranih sudskih odluka sa što manje kontrole i u kratkom roku, kao da je u pitanju odluka domaćih pravosudnih organa. Na osnovu ovog principa usvojen je veliki broj instrumenata kojima se ostvaruje bliža saradnja parvosudnih i policijskih organa država članica EU i ovaj princip operacionalizuje u praksi.<br />Predmet doktorske disertacije su upravo ti savremeni oblici saradnje pravosudnih i policijskih organa u krivičnim stvarima na nivou EU koji se realizuju kroz primenu principa uzajamnog priznavanja i njihova usaglašenost sa osnovnim ljudskim pravima okrivljenog lica. Predmetna problematika obuhvata Evropsku uniju, kao teritorijalni entitet u okviru kojeg je princip uzajamnog priznavanja najrazvijeniji, kroz veliki broj instrumenata koji na njemu počivaju. Osnovni problem koji se javlja u vezi sa predmetom disertacije je u uspostavljanju balansa između potrebe za bezbednošću i efikasnošću krivičnog postupka, radi kojih je i ustanovljen čitav instrumentarijum koji će se proučavati i međunarodno priznatih ljudskih prava, koja su u ovom procesu zanemarena, a sve u cilju što veće saradnje i punog međusobnog poverenja u krivičnopravne sisteme država članica EU.<br />Cilj istraživanja predmetne problematike je nastojanje da se ukaže na dosadašnja dostignuća u ovoj oblasti na nivou EU, identifikuju problemi koji u ovoj oblasti postoje, analizira položaj okrivljenog na nivou EU, standardi zaštite prava okrivljenog prema Evropskoj konvenciji o ljudskim pravima i praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Kao krajnji cilj želi se dati odgovor na pitanje kakav je položaj okrivljenog lica u postupcima pružanja raznih oblika međunarodne pravne pomoći u krivičnim stvarima na nivou EU u zavisnosti od instrumenata saradnje i da li balans između bezbednosti i zaštite ljudskih prava na nivou EU postoji ili kako se može postići.<br />VI<br />U radu je predstavljen princip uzajamnog priznavanja i odabrana su četiri instrumenta koja počivaju na ovom principu, kao tipični predstavnici: Evropski nalog za hapšenje, Evropski nalog za sprovođenje istrage, Evropski nalog za vršenje nadzora i instrument koji reguliše uzajamno priznavanje mera probacije i alternativnih sankcija. Analizom pravnih osnova na kojima počivaju, stanja implementacije u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i praksom primene, došlo se do saznanja o prednostima i nedostacima principa uzajamnog priznavanja. Pored toga, uočen je veliki propust tvoraca ovih instrumenata da zaštite osnovna ljudska prava okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku. Stoga je pristupljeno analizi stanja ljudskih prava okrivljenog na nivou EU i mogućih pravnih puteva zaštite prava okrivljenog u slučaju povrede prava u postupku primene savremenih oblika institucionalne saradnje u krivičnim stvarima. Osim EU, naglasak je u radu stavljen i na postupak pružanja međunarodne pravne pomoći u krivičnim stvarima po propisima Republike Srbije i izvršeno je poređenje sa sistemom uzajamnog priznavanja koji je na snazi u EU. U zaključnim razmatranjima su izneti zaključci sprovedenog istraživanja, predlozi de lege ferenda za unapređenje principa uzajamnog priznavanja i položaja okrivljenog na nivou EU, kao i stav o usaglašenosti potrebe za efikasnošću krivičnog postupka na nivou EU i zaštite osnovnih ljudskih prava okrivljenog.</p> / <p>The fight against the hardest forms of cross-border crime required the establishment of a closer cooperation between the Member States of the European Union. In the light of that aim, the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions was established, which is reflected in the fact of recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions with less control and in a short term, as if it was a decision of the national judicial authorities. On the basis of this principle a large number of instruments was adopted, which enable closer cooperation of judical and police authorities of the EU Member States and allow this principle to operate in practice.<br />The subject matter of the doctoral thesis are these modern forms of cooperation between judicial and police authorities in criminal matters at the EU level that are implemented through the application of the principle of mutual recognition and their compliance with fundamental human rights of the defendant. The subject matter also includes the European Union, as a territorial entity where the principle of mutual recognition is most developed, through a number of instruments that are based on it. The main problem that arises in connection with the subject matter of the dissertation is to establish a balance between the need for security and efficiency of the criminal proceedings for which the entire instrumentation to be studied was established and internationally recognized human rights, which are ignored in this process, all in order to achieve a greater cooperation and full mutual trust in the criminal justice systems of the EU Member States.<br />The aim of this research is in an attempt to highlight the previous achievements in this area at the EU level, identify the problems that exist in this field, analyze the position of the defendant at the level of EU and standards to protect the defendant&#39;s rights under the European Convention on Human Rights and according to the practise of the European Court of Human rights. The ultimate aim would be to provide an answer to the question concerning the position of the defendant in the proceedings of providing various forms of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters at the EU level, depending on the instruments of cooperation and whether there is balance between security and human rights protection at the EU level or how it may be achieved.<br />VIII<br />The paper presents the principle of mutual recognition and the following four instruments based on this principle, were selected as typical representatives: The European Arrest Warrant, The European Investigation Order, The European Supervision Order and an instrument that regulates mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions. By analysing the legal basis of this instruments, state of their implementation in national legislations and their enforcement in practise, we learned about the advantages and disadvantages of the principle of mutual recognition. In addition, a major failure was observed of the creators of these instruments to protect the basic human rights of the defendant in a criminal proceedings. Therefore, it was necessary to analyse the state of human rights of the defendant at the EU level and possible legal ways of protecting the rights of the defendant in case of infringement of rights in the process of the applying contemporary forms institutional cooperation in criminal matters. Besides the EU, the emphasis is put on the procedure of providing mutual legal assistance in criminal matters under the regulations of the Republic of Serbia and it was compared with the system of mutual recognition which is in force in the EU. In final considerations the conclusions of the research are presented, as well as the proposals de lege ferenda to improve the principle of mutual recognition and position of the defendant at the EU level, along with the opinion regarding the compliance of the need for effective criminal proceedings with the EU level protection of fundamental human rights of the defendant.</p>

Révolution dans l’ordre juridique international pénal, le mandat d’arrêt européen a été la traduction, concrète, d’un espace judiciaire européen en matière pénale. La création du mandat d’arrêt européen est né du constat d’un décalage, dont tirait profit la criminalité : alors que la liberté de circulation des biens, des services et des personnes était devenue une réalité au sein de l’Union européenne, l’effet des décisions de justice, expression de la souveraineté étatique, restait confiné aux limites frontalières nationales de chaque Etat membre. Visant à remplacer le système classique d’extradition au sein de l’Union européenne, en imposant à chaque autorité judiciaire nationale de reconnaître, moyennant un contrôle minimum, une demande de remise émanant de l’autorité judiciaire d’un autre Etat membre, le mandat d’arrêt européen est la conséquence d’une volonté de coopération efficace, visant à apporter une réponse pénale, forte, à la criminalité. L’ « euromandat » a été la première application concrète du principe de reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions de justice. Pierre angulaire de la coopération pénale européenne, ce principe repose sur le préalable nécessaire et fondamental de confiance mutuelle que doivent s’accorder, entre eux, les Etats membres, quant au fonctionnement de leur système juridique pénal interne et à la qualité des décisions rendues par leurs juridictions respectives. Théoriquement, le principe de reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions de justice implique l’existence de véritables standards communs des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne, en ce sens que tous les Etats membres doivent assurer, de manière équivalente, le respect des libertés individuelles, des droits de l’homme et des garanties procédurales. Pourtant, en pratique, le mandat d’arrêt européen fait courir le risque, pour un Etat membre, de remettre une personne (y compris un national), aux autorités judiciaires d’un autre Etat membre, qui ne garantirait pas, effectivement, les droits fondamentaux, en général, et les droits de la défense, en particulier. / A Revolution in the international criminal legal order, the European arrest warrant was the concrete translation of a European judicial area for criminal issues. The European arrest warrant was created to close a loophole which benefitted criminals: while the free circulation of goods, services and people had become a reality within the European Union, the effect of legal decisions, the expression of a State’s sovereignty, remained confined to the national borders of each Member State. Aimed at replacing the classic extradition system within the European Union, by forcing each national judicial authority to recognise a request to surrender a suspect, from the judicial authority of another Member State, the European arrest warrant is the result of a desire for efficient cooperation, and is intended to send a strong message to criminals. The “Euro-warrant” was the first concrete application of the principal of mutual recognition of judicial decisions. The Cornerstone of the European criminal cooperation, this principal relies on the fundamental requirement of mutual trust between the Member States, with respect to the functioning of their internal criminal justice systems and the quality of the rulings made by their respective jurisdictions. Theoretically, the principal of mutual recognition of judicial decisions implies the existence of true common standards of fundamental rights in the European Union, in the sense that all the Member States must respect individual freedoms, human rights and procedural guarantees. However, in practice the European arrest warrant runs the risk of surrendering a person (including a national) to the judicial authorities of another Member State who do not effectively guarantee the fundamental rights in general and more specifically the right to defend oneself.

The economical and judicial cooperation that EU constitutes results in that there is an increasing amount of international disputes arising. These international disputes in turn result in questions concerning private international law. The principle of mutual trust is not only an important principle in the entire judicial cooperation but especially important in the area of private international law. The principle means that the member states have to trust each other and the different legal systems. The aim of the principle is to ensure a well functioning internal market that is permeated by free circulation and freedom of establishment. In order to achieve a well functioning internal market it is necessary that the member states trust each other. The development during the last years have resulted in that the recognition and enforcement have been and will be improved as well as simplified in the entire area of private international law. The question the author has in mind is if there will be a time when the EU and its member states are ready for full implementation of the principle of mutual trust. Such implementation would mean that the member states have to trust each other and the different legal systems completely and be willing to let go of the possibility to refuse to recognise and enforce judgments issued in other member states. The discussion in the paper leads to the conclusion that the author finds it unlikely that there will be such a time. This conclusion is based on the discussion of the development and the reasons behind it and also the situation of the EU today. The economical crisis within the union is also in an aspect likely to have an effect on whether or not member states are willing to trust each other’s legal systems. The result of this situation and the previous development in the area leads the author to the conclusion that it will probably be necessary to maintain some sort of safeguards in the future also, either by grounds for refusal or minimum standards.

In today’s society it is not uncommon for people to move across borders. We are more likely to work and study in other countries, initiate cross-border relationships, acquire property in other states and change our residence. Therefore it is not uncommon for a per-son to leave inheritance in several states. The laws of succession differ between countries which creates an uncertainty among the devisors when planning their successions. This un-certainty, to which court has jurisdiction and to which country’s law is applicable, is con-sidered as incompatible with the free movement of people and capital within the EU. Therefore, the EU regulation No 650/2012 has been introduced to reduce the uncertainty and enable the EU citizens to govern their successions in advance.The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the regulation solves the current problems regarding the court of jurisdiction and applicable law in cross-border situations concerning succession within the EU and how this regulation in these matters relate to third state. To answer the purpose of this paper the applicable law is studied from a problem-based per-spective. The sources of law is systematized, interpreted and defined in the paper with a descriptive method.The regulation states that the principle of domicile is to be used as a harmonizing principle both regarding jurisdiction and applicable law. The regulation however, does not provide a clear definition of the term domicile. The authors of this paper consider this to be a problem in the enforcement of the principle. The regulation has universal application, wherefore the court may have to apply another state’s law when judging the succession. In such situations it may, for several reasons, be difficult to maintain a high level of legal certainty. The regu-lation only binds the Member States but may still be beneficial in successions related to a third State. / I dagens samhälle är det vanligt att människor rör sig över landsgränserna. Gränsöverskri-dandeförhållanden inleds, allt fler personer arbetar och studerar utanför medborgarskaps-landet, de byter hemvist och förvärvar egendom i andra stater, vilket gör att det vid en per-sons bortgång inte är ovanligt att denne efterlämnar kvarlåtenskap i flera stater. Staters arvsrättsliga regler skiljer sig åt vilket skapar en osäkerhet hos arvlåtaren då denne ska pla-nera för sin kvarlåtenskap. Denna oförutsägbarhet, avseende främst vilken domstol som är behörig samt vilken lag som är tillämplig, har ansetts strida mot den fria rörligheten av människor och kapital inom EU. Därför har en EU-förordning, nr 650/2012 av den 4 juli 2012 om behörighet, tillämplig lag, erkännande och verkställighet av domar samt godkän-nande och verkställighet av officiella handlingar i samband med arv och om inrättandet av ett europeiskt arvsintyg, förhandlats fram för att minska osäkerheten och underlätta för EU:s medborgare att utforma sina arvsrättsliga förhållanden i förväg.Syftet med denna uppsats är att utreda huruvida förordning nr 650/2012 löser nuvarande problematik avseende domsrätts- och lagvalsfrågorna i gränsöverskridanade arvsituationer inom EU samt hur denna förordning i dessa frågor förhåller sig till tredjestat. För att be-svara syftet utreds gällande rätt ur en problemorienterad synvinkel. Rättskällorna systemati-seras och tolkas för att sedan framställas i uppsatsen med en deskriptiv metod.I förordningen anges hemvistprincipen som harmoniserande anknytningsprincip både av-seende domsrätt och lagval. Det anges dock ingen klar och tydlig definition av hemvistbe-greppet, vilket uppsatsförfattarna anser utgör ett problem vid tillämpningen av principen. Förordningen är universell varför den behöriga domstolen kan tvingas tillämpa en annan stats lag. I sådana situationer kan det av flera anledningar vara svårt att upprätthålla en hög rättsäkerhet. Förordningen binder endast unionens medlemsstater men kan ändå vara till fördel i arvsmål med anknytning till tredjestat.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

A agroindústria familiar rural surge como uma alternativa na busca de novos nichos de mercados, utilizando-se da maior diversidade de produtos e da diferenciação dos produtos através da transformação dentro da propriedade. Sua implantação é considerada uma alternativa eficaz como política de Desenvolvimento Rural, mas com todos os esforços, existem muitas limitações neste setor, principalmente da legislação sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a agroindústria familiar rural, como as regras são construídas dentro da comunidade e aceitas pelos próprios agricultores, quanto à realidade produtiva, às leis e às normas que qualificam a produção agroindustrial. A Teoria das Convenções baseia-se no reconhecimento mútuo e coletivo da qualidade ampla do produto, e foi utilizada para explicar como funcionam as interações entre produtores com relação às regras de produção ou “modos de fazer” no processo produtivo. Foram entrevistadas 14 agroindústrias na Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, nos municípios de Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha. Este estudo caracterizou-se por uma pesquisa exploratória, cuja coleta de dados foi feita através de formulário semi-estruturado, diário de campo e dados secundários. Foi feita análise de conteúdo e análise quantitativa de dados. A construção dos mercados e das regras que os regem, mesmo com o cumprimento das normas legais, vem de dentro do processo e com a colaboração de todos os atores: produtores, consumidores e instituições apoiadoras do setor. A incorporação de novas práticas e de um consumidor mais informado e atuante trouxe uma realidade de maior interação, onde a construção do mercado é feita por todos os atores, e estes também utilizam do prévio conhecimento uns dos outros para atestar a qualidade dos produtos e de tudo que compõe o mercado, consolidando assim, uma rede de interações baseada também na confiança. Mesmo com garantias legais, como os selos e os alvarás da inspeção sanitária, a garantia baseada na confiança é a mais importante, aliada à efetiva qualidade dos produtos. A qualidade é construída e vista nas agroindústrias não só como um processo físico, mas também contando com aspectos sociais e culturais e considerando o esforço pessoal na confecção dos produtos, a dedicação, a tradição e os “modos de fazer” artesanal, que trazem o toque especial colonial. Utilizam-se das boas práticas na produção à medida que seu capital para investimento pode atender, prezando pela qualidade (apresentação e sanidade dos produtos), e compartilham essas premissas tanto com colegas de feira e associação, quanto com os consumidores. As convenções nas agroindústrias existem e são seguidas pelos produtores e supervisionadas por seus consumidores, onde todos contribuem e coletivamente as constroem, trocando informações, fiscalizando e sugestionando mudanças. Os produtores demonstram grandes esforços em prosperar e desenvolver, mas é necessário que exista apoio governamental e institucional para divulgação, qualificação e adequação da legislação para a agricultura familiar. / The rural familiar agroindustry is an alternative in the search for new niche markets, using the greater diversity of existing products and product differentiation by transforming them inside the property. Its implementation is considered an effective alternative as policy fot Rural Development, but despite all efforts there are many limitations in this sector, especially in sanitary legislation. The aim of this study is to analyze rural familiar agroindustry, how these rules are built within the community and accepted by the farmers themselves, as the present production, laws and standards that qualify the agroindustrial production and The Theory of the Convention is based on mutual recognition and collective of wide quality of the product, and was used to explain how interactions are worked among producers regarding production rules or “ways to make” the production process. 14 agroindustries in the Metropolitan Area oh Porto Alegre, in the municipalities of Porto Alegre, Viamão, Gravataí e Glorinha were interviewed. This study was characterized by an exploratory research, whose sample collection data was made through a semi-structured field diary and secondary data. Content analysis and quantitative analysis of data were made. The construction of markets and the rules that govern them even with the compliance of the law comes from within the process and the collaboration of all agents: producers, consumers and supporting institutions of the sector. The incorporation of new practices and a more informed consumer and acting also brought reality for more interaction, where the construction market is made by all agents, and they use prior knowledge of each other to improve the quality of products and anything that makes up the market, thus consolidating a network of interactions also based on trust. Even with legal safeguards, such as labels and licenses from the sanitary inspection, the assurance based on trust is the most important, combined with the effective product quality. Quality is built on the agroindustries by looking not only at a physical process, but also relying on social and cultural aspects, considering personal efforts in making the products, dedication, tradition and artisanal “ways to make”, which bring the colonial touch. Utilizing the best practices in production that their capital investment can provide, emphasizing quality (presentation of products and sanity), and sharing these premises with colleagues from fair and association, as with consumers. The conventions in agroindustries already exist, and are followed by producers and supervised by its consumers, which all contribute and build collectively, exchanging information, monitoring and suggesting changes. Producers showed great effort in prospering and developing, but there must be government support and institutional basis for marketing, qualifying and adequacy of rules for family farmers.

No description available.

Unstoppable development in every area of life which brings an innovative methods, implements and forms has been an inherent part of the evolution of society for a long time now. Accordingly, the field of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters with phased pressure on the integrating procedures within the framework of the European Union, with the development of international relations between the Member States, and with increased rate of criminal activity exceeding the implementation of free movement of persons within the European Union has been made to reflect introduction of new mechanisms. The main task of such mechanisms is repressing organised crime and cross-border criminal activities, and also protection of fundamental rights of individuals who are suspected of commiting an offence. One of these mechanisms is the European arrest warrant, relatively new legal instrument to which is my diploma work devoted to. This instrument of criminal law based on the principle of mutual recognitions in criminal matters represents not just a symbol of mutual confidence for the Member States reflecting in their systems of criminal justice, but also some achievement of philosophical purpose in integrating aspects or rather ambitions in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It is...

Cette recherche, inscrite dans le cadre du « vivre ensemble », consiste à identifier une relation entre construction de savoirs et reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs en situation d’apprentissage. Identifier cette relation nécessite de problématiser la place du sujet scolaire éducable au « vivre ensemble » et la didactique adaptée à cette éducabilité. Déterminée par un contexte d’apprentissage de plus en plus rationalisé, la place du sujet scolaire ne lui permet plus qu’un accès au savoir ayant perdu tout sens en dehors d’une efficience indispensable aux logiques économiques et technicistes. Une autre place peut-elle permettre un autre rapport au savoir, celle d’un sujet riche de sa complexité psychologique, sociale et émotionnelle ? Ces dimensions n’impliqueraient plutôt pas un apprentissage interactif autorisant des expériences émotionnelles susceptibles d’assurer les conditions d’une reconnaissance mutuelle dans l’apprendre ? La recherche de terrain porte sur une situation interactive de lecture compréhension d’albums par un groupe identique de six enfants sur les trois ans du cycle 2. L’entretien, mené par les professeurs respectifs, se réalise selon le guide d’entretien d’un questionnement. Ce dernier a pour but de favoriser l’interprétation par le canal d’expériences émotionnelles singulières et d’aider à transformer les informations narratives en significations morales ou idéologiques comme outil de l’action de l’élève. Les outils d’analyses portent sur l’identification de l’interface des expériences émotionnelles traduites par le verbal et le non verbal des co-énonciations et leur rôle dans la reconnaissance identification et la reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs. / The aim of this research, as part of the framework "Living Together", is to identify a relationship between the construction of knowledge and the mutual recognition of actors in a learning situation. To identify this relationship implies questioning not only the situation of the trainable school subject as to the framework "Living Together" but also the suitable didactics for this trainability. Due to an increasing rationalized learning context, the current situation only allows the school subject to acquire a knowledge which has lost all meaning beyond an efficiency dictated by economic and technical logics. Can there be a different approach to knowledge construction - that of a pupil complex and rich in psychological, social and emotional aspects? Should these dimensions not rather imply an interactive construction of knowledge, allowing for emotional experiences to ensure the conditions for mutual recognition in the learning process? The conducted field research has been based on interactive sessions of story reading to the same group of six children during three years of cycle #2. The interviews, conducted by the respective teachers, have been conducted according to the established guidelines for questioning. The purpose of the latter is to facilitate the interpretation through singular emotional experiences and to help transform narrative information into moral or ideological meanings, which can then be used as a tool by the school subject. The analytical tools focus on the identification of emotional experiences interface, through verbal and non-verbal exchanges, and their role in identity construction as well as mutual recognition of the stake holders.