<p>Uvod: U svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa, postoperativna vizita anesteziologa na odelјenjima rutinski se ne izvodi, niti su ustanovlјeni jasni kriterijumi i stavovi o njenom značaju na zadovolјstvo bolesnika anestezijom. Cilј ovog istraživanja je bio konstrukcija i psihometrijska provera instrumenta koji može rutinski da se koristi za procenu zadovolјstva bolesnika anestezijom u svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa na na&scaron;im prostorima, kao i da se ispita uticaj postoperativne vizite anesteziolioga na zadovolјstvo bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena. Materil i metode rada: U istraživanje je bilo uklјučeno 218 ispitanika, starijih od 18 godina, koji dobro govore i pi&scaron;u srpski jezik, koji su ASA I i ASA II statusa i koji su bili operisani u op&scaron;toj anesteziji. Ispitanici su podelјeni u tri grupe: prvu grupu čini 74 bolesnika, koje je postoperativno na odelјenju obi&scaron;ao anesteziolog koji je davao anesteziju, drugu grupu čini 70 bolesnika, koje je posle operacije obi&scaron;ao medicinski tehničar na anesteziji, koji nije učestvovao u anesteziji i treću grupu čini 74 bolesnika, koji nisu imali postoperativnu vizitu. U prvoj fazi iztraživanja prikuplјali su se osnovni sociodemografski podaci i bolesnicima su usmeno postavlјena pitanja. U drugoj fazi istraživanja svim bolesnicima je data op&scaron;ta balansirana anestezija. U trećoj fazi istraživanja, sprovedena je prva postoperativna vizita anesteziologa za bolesnike prve grupe i prva postoperativna poseta medicinskog tehničara na anesteziji za bolesnike druge grupe. Treća, kontrolna grupa bolesnika nije imala postoperativnu vizitu. U okviru ove vizite procenjivalo se objektivno (PAS skor) i subjektivno stanje bolesnika. Druga postoperativna vizita sprovedena je prvog postoperativnog dana. Drugog postoperativnog dana bolesnicima je odelјenska medicinska sestra, koja nije učestvovala u perioperativnom periodu bolesnika, davala upitnik za merenje zadovolјstva bolesnika anestezijom. Rezultati: Upitnik zadovolјstva bolesnika anestezijom je konstruisan za potrebe istraživanja. Prve metrijske provere upitnika su utvrđene u pilot studiji na 100 ispitanika, na osnovu kojih je neizmenjen upitnik primenjen na celom uzorku. Na osnovu teorijskih okvira formulisana je 21 stavka. Upitnik se sastoji od četiri faktora: prvi faktor je Zadovolјstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, drugi faktor Perianestezijski komfor, treći faktor Nezadovolјstvo postoperativnom brigom i četvrti faktor Strah od anestezije Mera pouzdanosti upitnika na ovom uzorku izražena Kronbahovom alfom iznosi 0.889. Kada se uzmu u obzir sve stavke mera pouzdanosti izražena Kronbahovom alfom celog upitnika iznosi 0.845, &scaron;to ukazuje na visoku pouzdanost skale u celini. Kako bi se proverila konstruktna validnost upitnika, sprovedena je faktorska analiza na uzorku od 218 pacijenata. Bartletov test (p&lt;.01) i KMO vrednosti (KMO=0.880) ukazuju da je sprovođenje faktorske analize na ovom upitniku statistički opravdano. Srednje vrednosti interkorelacija faktora pokazuju da &scaron;to je odnos između anesteziologa i bolesnika bolјi, da će bolesnik imati manji strah od anestezije, biti zadovolјniji postoperativnom brigom i imati veći nivo komfora. Rezultati jednosmerne analize varijanse pokazuju da postoji statistički značajna razlika između grupa kada su u pitanju Zadovolјstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, Strah od anestezije i Nezadovolјstvo postoperativnom brigom. Grupe se statistički značajno ne razlikuju u Perianestezijskom komforu Kada je u pitanju faktor Zadovolјstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, eksperimentalna grupa koja je imala postoperativnu vizitu od strane anesteziologa je bila zadovolјnija ovim aspektom i od eksperimentalne grupe koja je imala postoperativnu vizitu od strane medicinskog tehničara koji nije učestvovao u davanju anestezije i od kontrolne grupe. Grupe se međusobno nisu statistički značajno razlikovale u proceni Perianestezijskog komfora. Kada je u pitanju Nezadovolјstvo postoperativnom brigom, kontrolna grupa se statistički značajno razlikuje u odnosu na obe eksperimentalne grupe. Bolesnici u kontrolnoj grupi su imali izraženiji Strah od anestezije u odnosu na eksperimentalnu grupu gde je postoperativnu posetu obavio anesteziolog. Zaklјučak: U ovom istraživanju konstruisan je visoko pouzdan upitnik koji može rutinski da se koristi za procenu zadovolјstva bolesnika anestezijom u svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa na na&scaron;im prostorima. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u zadovolјstvu bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena između bolesnika koji su imali postoperativnu vizitu anesteziologa i onih koji je nisu imali u korist bolesnika koji su imali postoperativnu vizitu anesteziologa. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u zadovolјstvu bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena između onih koje je postoperativno obi&scaron;ao anesteziolog i onih koje je postoperativno obi&scaron;ao medicinski tehničar na anesteziji koji nije učestvovao u anesteziji.</p> / <p>Uvod: U svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa, postoperativna vizita anesteziologa na odeljenjima rutinski se ne izvodi, niti su ustanovljeni jasni kriterijumi i stavovi o njenom značaju na zadovoljstvo bolesnika anestezijom. Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio konstrukcija i psihometrijska provera instrumenta koji može rutinski da se koristi za procenu zadovoljstva bolesnika anestezijom u svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa na na&scaron;im prostorima, kao i da se ispita uticaj postoperativne vizite anesteziolioga na zadovoljstvo bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena. Materil i metode rada: U istraživanje je bilo uključeno 218 ispitanika, starijih od 18 godina, koji dobro govore i pi&scaron;u srpski jezik, koji su ASA I i ASA II statusa i koji su bili operisani u op&scaron;toj anesteziji. Ispitanici su podeljeni u tri grupe: prvu grupu čini 74 bolesnika, koje je postoperativno na odeljenju obi&scaron;ao anesteziolog koji je davao anesteziju, drugu grupu čini 70 bolesnika, koje je posle operacije obi&scaron;ao medicinski tehničar na anesteziji, koji nije učestvovao u anesteziji i treću grupu čini 74 bolesnika, koji nisu imali postoperativnu vizitu. U prvoj fazi iztraživanja prikupljali su se osnovni sociodemografski podaci i bolesnicima su usmeno postavljena pitanja. U drugoj fazi istraživanja svim bolesnicima je data op&scaron;ta balansirana anestezija. U trećoj fazi istraživanja, sprovedena je prva postoperativna vizita anesteziologa za bolesnike prve grupe i prva postoperativna poseta medicinskog tehničara na anesteziji za bolesnike druge grupe. Treća, kontrolna grupa bolesnika nije imala postoperativnu vizitu. U okviru ove vizite procenjivalo se objektivno (PAS skor) i subjektivno stanje bolesnika. Druga postoperativna vizita sprovedena je prvog postoperativnog dana. Drugog postoperativnog dana bolesnicima je odeljenska medicinska sestra, koja nije učestvovala u perioperativnom periodu bolesnika, davala upitnik za merenje zadovoljstva bolesnika anestezijom. Rezultati: Upitnik zadovoljstva bolesnika anestezijom je konstruisan za potrebe istraživanja. Prve metrijske provere upitnika su utvrđene u pilot studiji na 100 ispitanika, na osnovu kojih je neizmenjen upitnik primenjen na celom uzorku. Na osnovu teorijskih okvira formulisana je 21 stavka. Upitnik se sastoji od četiri faktora: prvi faktor je Zadovoljstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, drugi faktor Perianestezijski komfor, treći faktor Nezadovoljstvo postoperativnom brigom i četvrti faktor Strah od anestezije Mera pouzdanosti upitnika na ovom uzorku izražena Kronbahovom alfom iznosi 0.889. Kada se uzmu u obzir sve stavke mera pouzdanosti izražena Kronbahovom alfom celog upitnika iznosi 0.845, &scaron;to ukazuje na visoku pouzdanost skale u celini. Kako bi se proverila konstruktna validnost upitnika, sprovedena je faktorska analiza na uzorku od 218 pacijenata. Bartletov test (p&lt;.01) i KMO vrednosti (KMO=0.880) ukazuju da je sprovođenje faktorske analize na ovom upitniku statistički opravdano. Srednje vrednosti interkorelacija faktora pokazuju da &scaron;to je odnos između anesteziologa i bolesnika bolji, da će bolesnik imati manji strah od anestezije, biti zadovoljniji postoperativnom brigom i imati veći nivo komfora. Rezultati jednosmerne analize varijanse pokazuju da postoji statistički značajna razlika između grupa kada su u pitanju Zadovoljstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, Strah od anestezije i Nezadovoljstvo postoperativnom brigom. Grupe se statistički značajno ne razlikuju u Perianestezijskom komforu Kada je u pitanju faktor Zadovoljstvo odnosom anesteziologa prema bolesniku, eksperimentalna grupa koja je imala postoperativnu vizitu od strane anesteziologa je bila zadovoljnija ovim aspektom i od eksperimentalne grupe koja je imala postoperativnu vizitu od strane medicinskog tehničara koji nije učestvovao u davanju anestezije i od kontrolne grupe. Grupe se međusobno nisu statistički značajno razlikovale u proceni Perianestezijskog komfora. Kada je u pitanju Nezadovoljstvo postoperativnom brigom, kontrolna grupa se statistički značajno razlikuje u odnosu na obe eksperimentalne grupe. Bolesnici u kontrolnoj grupi su imali izraženiji Strah od anestezije u odnosu na eksperimentalnu grupu gde je postoperativnu posetu obavio anesteziolog. Zaključak: U ovom istraživanju konstruisan je visoko pouzdan upitnik koji može rutinski da se koristi za procenu zadovoljstva bolesnika anestezijom u svakodnevnom kliničkom radu anesteziologa na na&scaron;im prostorima. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u zadovoljstvu bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena između bolesnika koji su imali postoperativnu vizitu anesteziologa i onih koji je nisu imali u korist bolesnika koji su imali postoperativnu vizitu anesteziologa. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u zadovoljstvu bolesnika anestezijom podvrgnutih rekonstrukciji prednjeg ukr&scaron;tenog ligamenta kolena između onih koje je postoperativno obi&scaron;ao anesteziolog i onih koje je postoperativno obi&scaron;ao medicinski tehničar na anesteziji koji nije učestvovao u anesteziji.</p> / <p>Introduction: In daily clinical practice the anesthesiologist, anesthesiologist postoperative rounds on the wards routine is not performed, not have established clear criteria and attitudes about its importance to the satisfaction of patients anesthesia. The aim of this study was to design and psychometric instrument checks that can routinely be used to assess patient satisfaction with anesthesia in everyday clinical practice anesthesiologist in our region, as well as to investigate the influence of post-operative rounds of anesthesiologisr to the satisfaction of patients undergoing anesthesia reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Matera and methods: The study included 218 patients, aged 18 years, who speak and write the Serbian language, which are ASA I and ASA II status and who were operated under general anesthesia. Subjects were divided into three groups: the first group consists of 74 patients, which is postoperatively in the department visited the anesthesiologist who gave the anesthesia, the second group consists of 70 patients, which is postoperatively visited the medical technician to anesthesia, who was not involved in the anesthesia and the third group makes 74 patients who had postoperative rounds. In the first phase Researches were collected basic socio-demographic data and patients are oral questions. In the second phase of the study all patients received general balanced anesthesia. In the third phase of the study, conducted the first post-operative rounds anesthesiologist for patients of the first group and the first post-operative visit a medical technician in anesthesia for patients other groups. The third, control group patients had postoperative rounds. Within these rounds judged objectively (PAS score) and subjective state of patients. The second post-operative rounds conducted the first postoperative day. On the second postoperative day, the patients underwent Classroom nurse, who did not participate in the perioperative period, patients given a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with anesthesia. Results: The questionnaire satisfaction with anesthesia was designed for research purposes. The first metric verification of the questionnaire were determined in a pilot study on 100 subjects, on which it is unchanged from the questionnaire applied to the whole sample. Based on the theoretical framework formulated in paragraph 21. The questionnaire consists of four factors: the first factor is the ratio of pleasure anesthesiologist to the patient, another factor perianesthesian comfort, the third factor Dissatisfaction postoperative care and the fourth factor, fear of anesthesia questionnaire to measure the reliability of the sample expressed Cronbach alpha is 0.889. When taking into account all items measure expressed by Cronbach alpha reliability of the whole questionnaire is 0.845, which indicates the high reliability of the scale as a whole. In order to test the construct validity of the questionnaire, factor analysis was conducted on a sample of 218 patients. Bartlett&#39;s test (p &lt;.01) and the KMO value (KMO = 0.880) indicate that the implementation of factor analysis on the questionnaire statistically significant. Mean values Intercorrelation factors show that the relationship between the anesthesiologist and patient better, the patient will have less fear of anesthesia, be satisfied with the postoperative care and have a higher level of comfort. Results-way analysis of variance show that there is a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of their satisfaction with the anesthesiologist to the patient, and the fear of anesthesia and postoperative care Dissatisfaction. The groups do not differ significantly in perianesthesia comfort when it comes to sexual satisfaction factor anesthesiologist to the patient, the experimental group had post-operative rounds by the anesthesiologist was pleased with this aspect of the experimental group had post-operative rounds by medical technicians who did not participated in giving anesthesia and the control group. Groups each other not statistically significant in assessing perianesthesia comfort. When it comes to the dissatisfaction of postoperative care, the control group was significantly different from both experimental groups. Patients in the control group had a pronounced fear of anesthesia compared to the experimental group in which the postoperative visit carried anesthesiologist. Conclusion: In this study constructed a highly reliable questionnaire that can be routinely used to assess patient satisfaction with anesthesia in everyday clinical practice anesthesiologist in our region. There was a statistically significant difference in the satisfaction of patients undergoing anesthesia reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament between the patients who had postoperative rounds anesthesiologist and those who did not have the benefit of patients who had postoperative rounds anesthesiologist. There was a statistically significant difference in the satisfaction of patients undergoing anesthesia reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament between those postoperatively visited the anesthesiologist and those he visited postoperative medical technician in anesthesia who was not involved in anesthesia.</p>

<p>UVOD. Bilijarna kalkuloza je najče&scaron;će oboljenje hepatobilijarnog sistema, a holecistektomija predstavlja jedan od najče&scaron;će izvođenih operativnih zahvata. Laparoskopska holecistektomija je danas zlatni standard lečenja holelitijaze. Laparoskopska holecistektomija je pokazala pobolj&scaron;anje u klinički značajnim ishodima kao &scaron;to su skraćenje operativnog vremena, kraća hospitalizacija, smanjenje jačine i trajanja postoperativnog bola i brži povratak dnevnim i radnim aktivnostima. Postoperativna bol i vreme potpunog oporavka ostaju dva glavna problema posle nekomplikovane laparoskopske holecistektomije koje bi trebalo pobolj&scaron;ati. Bol koji je povezan sa laparoskopskom holecistektomijom je kompleksan i multifaktorijalan. On nastaje o&scaron;tećenjem tkiva, disekcijom i uklanjanjem žučne kesice iz svoje lože, stimulacijom periportalnih nerava, iritacijom dijafragme, mehaničkim i hemijskim interakcijama gasa i pneumoperitoneuma, incizijama portova. Istraživanja su označila parijetalni i visceralni bol kao dva glavna mehanizma nastanka bola kod laparoskopske holecistektomije. Bol se ne može meriti nego proceniti jer je subjektivni osećaj. Pokazalo se potrebnim da se na čvr&scaron;ćim naučnim osnovama da odgovor na pitanje da li je moguće blokirati parijetalni i visceralni bol posle laparoskopske holecistektomije u akutnoj fazi. CILJEVI. Cilj studije je da uporedi standardnu analgeziju (ne-opioidnu) (grupa O) sa davanjem parijetalne blokade (grupa P), ili davanjem visceralne blokade (grupa V), ili sa obe date blokade (grupa P+V). Primarni ishodi studije su bolesnikov procenjeni bol pre operacije i posle operacije na 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 sati i 7. dana. Sekundarni ishodi studije su bolesnikova procenjena mučnina na 1,2,4,6,12 sati i bolesnikova procenjena mobilnost 1. 2. i 7. dan. HIPOTEZA. Blokada postoperativnog visceralnog bola i blokada postoperativnog parijetalnog bola posle laparoskopske holecistektomije putem intraperitonealne lokalne infiltracije anestetikom i putem lokalne infiltracije anestetikom pristupnih laparoskopskih portova može značajno smanjiti rani postoperativni bol. MATERIJAL I METODE. Ova prospektivna, randomizirana jednostruko slepa studija je započela septembra 2014. godine i trajala je do januara 2016. godine. Istraživanje je sprovedeno na Klinici za abdominalnu, endokrinu i transplantacionu hirurgiju i Urgentnom centru Kliničkog centra Vojvodine u Novom Sadu kod bolesnika operisanih metodom laparoskopske holecistektomije. Rad je podeljen u nekoliko celina. 1. Procena veličine uzorka; 2. Procena podobnosti za studiju; 3. Anketiranje i uključivanje u studiju; 4. Razvrstavanje u grupe i operativni rad; 5. Period postoperativnog praćenja; 6. Statistička obrada i pisanje rada.<br />1. Procena veličine uzorka. Studija je realizovana podelom bolesnika u 4 grupe. Neophodni broj bolesnika je izračunat uzimajući podatke iz pilot istraživanja slične studije iz 2012. godine. Veličina uzorka je računata za primarni ishod studije&nbsp; (bolesnikov procenjen bol sa NAS) na pretpostavci da treba biti 20% smanjenja bola u prvom postoperativnom satu, uz verovatnoću Tip 1 gre&scaron;ke &alpha;=0.05 i Tipa 2 gre&scaron;ke &beta;=0.10 da postigne adekvatnu statističku snagu oko 80% i da otkrije 20% razlike u srednjoj vrednosti procenjenog bola jedan sat nakon laparoskopske&nbsp; holecistektomije. Procenjeni broj ispitanika po grupama prema zadatim kriterijumima je bio (P+V=65; P=68; V=68; O=65). Studija je započela uključivanjem prvog bolesnika u studiju a zavr&scaron;ena ispunjenim periodom praćenja sve dok poslednji bolesnik nije doneo upitnike o bolu, mučnini i kretanju. 2. Procena podobnosti za studiju. U periodu studije ukupan broj holecistektomiranih bolesnika je bio 1024 (440 klasično i 584 laparoskopski). Samo pogodni bolesnici su anketirani (584) i pročitali su informacioni list o istraživanju. Uključivanje ili procena podobnosti bolesnika za studiju sprovedena je na osnovu uključnih i isključnih kriterijuma. U studiju nije uključeno ukupno 226 bolesnika. Od tog broja 82 bolesnika je odbilo učestvovati u studiji a 144 bolesnika nije ispunilo uključne postavljene kriterijume. Svojim potpisom potvrdilo je uče&scaron;će u studiji 358 bolesnika. 3. Anketiranje i uključivanje u studiju. Nakon prijema bolesnika u bolnicu ispitivači su uzimali anamnezu i bolesnicima je ponuđen informacioni list i informisani pristanak. Nakon čitanja informacije, potpisivanja informisanog pristanka i zadovoljavanja&nbsp; uključnih i isključnih kriterijuma 358 bolesnika je uključeno u studiju. Obavljena je preoperativna priprema i ispitivači su popunili deo podataka u individualnom listu. 4. Razvrstavanje u grupe i operativni rad. Neposredno preoperativno od strane nezavisne osobe neuključene u studiju napravljena je randomizacija izabranih (n=358) u studijske grupe tablicama slučajnog izbora, tako da bolesnici nisu znali kojoj grupi pripadaju, dok su operater i osoblje to znali na početku operacije (jednostruko slepa studija). Nakon randomizacije i operacije bolesnici pripadaju jednoj od sledeće 4 grupe: Kontrolna grupa O=89, u kojoj su bolesnici sa urađenom laparoskopskom&nbsp; holecistektomijom bez visceralne blokade anestetikom i bez parijetalne blokade anestetikom. Eksperimentalna grupa P=88, u kojoj su bolesnici sa urađenom laparoskopskom holecistektomijom bez visceralne blokade anestetikom i sa parijetalnom blokadom anestetikom. Eksperimentalna grupa V=92, u kojoj su bolesnici sa urađenom laparoskopskom holecistektomijom sa visceralnom blokadom anestetikom i bez parijetalne blokade anestetikom. Eksperimentalna grupa P+V=89, u kojoj će biti bolesnici sa urađenom laparoskopskom holecistektomijom sa visceralnom blokadom anestetikom i sa parijetalnom blokadom anestetikom. Primenjivan je uobičajni, standardni protokol anestezije za laparoskopske operacije kod svih ispitanika. Svim bolesnicima plasirana je orogastrična sonda koja se nakon operacije odstranjivala. Kod&nbsp; bolesnika kod kojih je primenjivan lokalni anestetik neposredno pre početka operacije pravio se rastvor lokalnog anestetika (Marcaine&reg; 0,25%). Bolesnici su otpu&scaron;teni sa bolničkog lečenja prvog postoperativnog dana, pod uslovom da nisu imali komplikacija. 5. Postoperativno praćenje i ispunjavanje upitnika. Po dolasku na odeljenje&nbsp; bolesnicima je odmah uključivana ista analgezija. Tokom ispunjavanja informisanog pristanka, bolesnici su dobili upitnik na kojoj će sami procenjivati nivo bola, mučnine i kretanja tokom ležanja u bolnici i vremena praćenja od 7 dana kući. Bolesnici su dolazili na unapred zakazane postoperativne kontrole 7 do 10 dana posle operacije i donosili ispunjene upitnike. Otpu&scaron;teno je i za praćenje ostalo n=302 laparoskopski operisanih bolesnika a isključeno iz studije n=20 bolesnika. 6. Statistička obrada i pisanje rada. Ukupno je analizirano 274 listića operisanih bolesnika: u Grupi P+V =67; u Grupi P =70; u Grupi V =70 i u Grupi O =67. Od osnovnih deskriptivnih statističkih parametara za kvalitativnu i kvantitativnu procenu dobijenih rezultata su kori&scaron;ćeni apsolutni brojevi, relativni brojevi, mediana, mod, aritmetička sredina i standardna devijacija (SD). Obrada podataka se vr&scaron;ila&nbsp; osnovnim i naprednim statističkim metodama i programima. Rezultati su prikazani tabelarno i grafički. REZULTATI. Demografski podaci. Ukupno je bilo 188 žena i 86 mu&scaron;karaca, u odnosu 2,2 : 1. Prosečna starost cele grupe je bila 52,1 &plusmn; 15,72 godine. Ukupno je bilo 179 zaposlenih i 95 nezaposlenih. Ukupno je bilo 45 ispitanika sa osnovnim obrazovanjem, 153 ispitanika sa srednjim obrazovanjem i 76 ispitanika sa visokim obrazovanjem. Ukupno je bilo 186 nepu&scaron;ača i 88 pu&scaron;ača. Prosečna vrednost BMI cele grupe je bila 27,24 &plusmn; 4,21 kg/m2. Prosečna vrednost ASA u celoj grupi je bila 2,03 (mediana=2, mod=2). Ne postoji statistički značajna razlika između posmatranih grupa u odnosu na posmatrane parametre. Laboratorijski podaci. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u vrednosti leukocita između posmatranih grupa (p=0,039), u vrednosti uree između posmatranih grupa (p=0,040). Ne postoji statistički značajna razlika u vrednosti eritrocita, trombocita, hemoglobina, &Scaron;UK-a, kreatinina i bilirubina posmatranih grupa. Operativni i postoperativni podaci. Ne postoji statistički značajna razlika u količini upotrebljenog Fentanila između posmatranih grupa. Postoji statistički značajna razlika u dužini trajanja operacije između posmatranih grupa (p=0,003), u trajanju postavljenog abdominalnog drena između posmatranih grupa (p=0,024), u trajanju hospitalizacije između posmatranih grupa (p=0,027), u broju dana do povratka uobičajenim aktivnostima između posmatranih grupa (p=0,000), u broju uzetih tableta između posmatranih grupa (p=0,000). Prosečna ocena zadovoljstva bolesnika posle operacije u celoj grupi je bila 8,80 (mediana=9; mod=10). Najbolju ocenu zadovoljstva bolesnika posle operacije je imala grupa P+V. Procena bola, mučnine i kretanja. Postoji statistički značajna razlika između posmatranih grupa u proceni jačine bola pre operacije (p=0,003). Postoji statistički značajna razlika između posmatranih grupa u proceni jačine bola 1h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P+V); u proceni jačine bola 2h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P+V); u proceni jačine bola 4h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P); u proceni jačine bola 6h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P+V); u proceni jačine bola 12h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P+V); u proceni jačine bola 24h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P+V); u proceni jačine bola 48h posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P) i u proceni jačine bola 7 dana posle operacije (najbolju procenu bola je imala grupa P). Procenjena bol se pojačava otprilike 2,5 sata posle operacije sa vrhom 3 sata posle operacije, a smanjuje se na istu vrednost kao 2. sata posle operacije, otprilike 5. sata posle operacije. U vremenskim intervalima 1, 2. i 7. postoperativni dan postoji značajno pobolj&scaron;anje u postoperativnoj mobilnosti bolesnika. U vremenskim intervalima 1, 2, 4, 6 i 12 sati postoji značajno pobolj&scaron;anje u procenjenoj vrednosti mučnine bolesnika. Korelacije. Statistički značajna pozitivna korelacija ocene bola posle 1. sata, posle 2. sata, posle 6. sata, posle 12. sata je utvrđena sa brojem uzetih tableta (p=0,000), kao i procene mučnine (p=0,000). Statistički značajna pozitivna korelacija procene bola posle 4. sata je utvrđena sa brojem uzetih tableta (p=0,006), kao i aktivnosti (p=0,014). Statistički značajna korelacija procene bola posle 24. sata je utvrđena sa brojem uzetih tableta (p=0,000; pozitivna) i trajanjem operacije (p=0,028; negativna). Statistički značajna pozitivna korelacija procene bola posle 48. sata i posle 7 dana je utvrđena sa brojem uzetih tableta (p=0,000). ZAKLJUČCI: Primena lokalnog anestetika datog na bilo koji način značajno smanjuje bol posle laparoskopske holecistektomije. Primena lokalnog anestetika datog i&nbsp; portalno i visceralno (P+V) značajno smanjuje bol u odnosu na samo portalnu (P) ili visceralnu (V) primenu u vremenskim intervalima 2, 6, 12 sat posle laparoskopske holecistektomije. Portalna (P) primena sa ili bez visceralne (V) primene lokalnog anestetika značajno smanjuje bol u vremenskim intervalima 1, 4, 24, 48 sati i 7 dana posle laparoskopske holecistektomije. Najbolje kretanje je bilo u grupi P+V posle laparoskopske holecistektomije. Najbolje smanjenje procenjene mučnine je bilo u grupi P posle laparoskopske holecistektomije. Najraniji povratak uobičajenim aktivnostima zabeležen je u grupi P+V. Najbolja ocena zadovoljstva bolesnika hirur&scaron;kim lečenjem bila je u grupi P+V. Postoperativna bol ima najznačajniju pozitivnu korelaciju sa procenjenom mučninom i brojem tableta uzetih od momenta otpusta do prve kontrole bolesnika.</p> / <p>INTRODUCTION: Biliary calculosis is the most frequent disease of the hepatobiliary system, and cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Today laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the golden standard in treating cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed improvement in the clinically significant outcomes, such as: reducing the duration of the surgery, shorter hospital stay, reducing the intensity and duration of postoperative pain and faster return to normal daily and working activities. Postoperative pain and the time of full recovery remain the two major problems after a non-complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy and they should be improved. The pain related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is complex and multi-factorial in origin. The pain occurs due to damaged tissues, dissection and removal of gallbladder from its cavity, stimulation of periportal nerves, irritation of the diaphragm, mechanical and chemical interaction of gases and pneumoperitoneum and port incisions. Researches have denoted parietal and visceral pains as two major mechanisms in occurrence of pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain cannot be measured, but estimated, as it is a subjective feeling. It was considered necessary to find the answer, based on solid scientific evidence, if it was possible to block parietal and visceral pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in its acute phase. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare standard, non-opioid, analgesia (group O) with applying parietal blockade (group P), or visceral blockade (group V), or compare with both applied blockades (group P+V). The primary outcomes of the study are the patient&acute;s estimated pain before surgery and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and 7th day after the surgery. The secondary outcomes of this study are the patient&acute;s estimated nausea level during 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours, along with the patient&acute;s estimated mobility 1st, 2nd and 7th day, postoperatively. HYPOTHESIS. Blockade of postoperative visceral pain and blockade of postoperative parietal pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, applying intraperitoneal local infiltration with anesthetic and also by local infiltration with anesthetic through accessible laparoscopic ports, can significantly reduce early postoperative pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospectively randomized single-blinded study started in September 2014 and lasted up to January 2016. The research was carried out at the Clinic for Abdominal, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery and Emergency Center, Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad and it involved patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study has been divided into several units. 1. Assessment of sample size; 2. Assessment of eligibility for the study; 3. Survey and inclusion in the study; 4. Group formation and operational work; 5. Period of postoperative follow-up; 6. Statistical processing and writing the paper.1. Assessment of sample size. The study was realized by dividing the patients into 4 groups. The number of patients necessary was determined based on the data taken as pilot study from a similar study from 2012. Sample size was calculated for the primary outcome of the study (patient&acute;s estimated pain with NAS) based on the assumption that a pain reduction of 20% should occur during the first postoperative hour, with the probability of Type 1 error &alpha;=0.05 and Type 2 error &beta;=0.10 to reach the adequate statistical power of about 80%, and to reveal 20% difference in the average value of the estimated pain one hour after the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The assessed number of respondents in groups according to the set criteria was (P+V =65;P =68;V =68; O =65). The study started when the first patient was included and it ended with the complete follow-up period when the last patient handed in the survey about pain, nausea and mobility. 2. Assessment of eligibility for the study. During the study the number of patients undergoing surgery applying the method of cholecystectomy was 1024 (440 classical and 584 laparoscopic). Only the suitable patients were surveyed (584) and given to read the information leaflet about the study. Inclusion and assessment of patients&acute; eligibility was performed on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 226 patients was not included in the study. Out of that number 82 patients refused to participate in the study and 144 did not fulfill the inclusive criteria set. By signing 358 patients confirmed their participation in the study. 3. Survey and inclusion in the study. After admitting the patients to hospital the surveyors took their anamnesis and the patients were offered an information leaflet and informed consent. Following the reading of the information leaflet, signing the informed consent and satisfying the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 358 patients were included in the study. Preoperative preparations were performed and the surveyors filled in some of the data on the individual list. 4. Group formation and operational work. Prior to the surgery an independent person not included in the study carried out the randomisation of the patients chosen (n=358) into study groups by random selection tables. The patients did not know which group they belonged to, while it became known to the surgeon and the operation stuff at the beginning of the surgery (singleblinded study). After randomization and surgery the patients belonged to one of the following groups: Control group O=89 of patients with performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visceral blockade by anesthetic and without parietal blockade by anesthetic. Experimental group P=88 of patients with performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visceral blockade by anesthetic but with parietal blockade by anesthetic. Experimental group V=92 of patients with performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with visceral blockade by anesthetic but without parietal blockade by anesthetic. Experimental group P+V=89 of patients with performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with visceral blockade by anesthetic and with parietal blockade by anesthetic. The standard protocol of anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was applied to all patients. An orogastric tube used during the surgery, was removed after it. In patients with applied local anesthetic immediately before surgery a solution of local anesthetic was made (Marcaine&reg; 0,25%). The patients were discharged from hospital the first postoperative day, provided that no complications occurred. 5. Postoperative follow-up and completing the questionnaire. When admitted to the ward the patients were given the same kind of analgesia. While completing the informed consent the patients were given a questionnaire for estimating their pain level, nausea and mobility during their stay in hospital and during the 7-day follow-up period at home. The patients were required to come for 7 and 10-day postoperative check-ups by appointment and then they handed in the questionnaires. n=302 patients with performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy were released and designated for follow-up, and n=20 patients were excluded from the study. 6. Statistical processing and writing the paper. In total 274 operated patients&acute; slips were analysed, by groups as follows: in Group P+V =67; in Group P =70; in Group V =70 and in Group O =67. From the basic descriptive statistical parametres for qualitative and quantitative assessment of results obtained, absolute numbers, relative numbers, the median, mode, arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) were used. Data processing was carried out using basic and advanced statistical methods and programmes. The results are presented in tabular and graphical manner. RESULTS. Demographic data. In total there were 188 women and 86 men, in proportion 2,2 : 1. The average age of the whole group was 52,1 &plusmn; 15,72 years. In total there were 179 employed and 95 unemployed persons. In total there were 45 surveyed patients with primary education, 153 surveyed patients with secondary education and 76 surveyed patients with higher education. In total there were 186 nonsmokers and 88 smokers. The mean BMI value of the whole group was 27,24 &plusmn; 4,21 kg/m2. The mean value of ASA of the whole group was 2,03 (the median=2, mode=2). There is no significant difference among the groups observed considering the observed parametres. Laboratory data. There is a statistically significant difference in the value of leukocytes among the observed groups (p=0,039), and in the value of urea among the observed groups (p=0,040). There is no statistically significant difference in the value of the erythrocyte, platelets, hemoglobin, blood glucose, creatinine and bilirubin of the&nbsp; observed groups. Operative and postoperative data. There is no statistically significant difference in the amount of Fentanyl&reg; applied among the observed groups. There is statistically significant difference in the length of the surgery among the observed groups (p=0,003), in the duration of the positioning of abdominal drainage among the observed groups (p=0,024), in the duration of hospital stay among the observed groups (p=0,027), in the number of days until getting back to regular activities among the observed groups&nbsp; (p=0,000), in the number of taken pills among the observed groups (p=0,000). The patients&acute; average satisfaction grade after surgery in the whole group was 8,80 (the median=9; mode=10). Group P+V had the best patient&lsquo;s satisfaction grade after the surgery. Assessment of pain, nausea and mobility. There is statistically significant difference in the estimation of pain intensity before surgery among the observed groups (p=0,003). There is statistically significant difference in the estimation of pain intensity 1 hour after surgery among the observed groups (P+V having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 2 hours after&nbsp; surgery (P+V having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 4 hours after surgery (P having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 6 hours after surgery (P+V having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 12 hours after surgery (P+V having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 24 hours after surgery (P+V having the best estimated pain); in the estimation of pain intensity 48 hours after surgery (P having the best estimated pain) also in the estimation of pain intensity 7 days after surgery (P having the best estimated pain). The estimated pain intensifies at about 2,5 hours after surgery and peaks 3 hours after surgery, and decreases to the same level as it was during 2nd hour after surgery approximately during 5th hour after surgery. There is considerable improvement in mobility of patients in the time interval 1st, 2nd and 7th postoperative days. There is considerable improvement in estimated nausea level of patients in the time interval 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 hours. Correlations. Statistically significant positive correlation in estimated pain after 1st hour, after 2nd hour, after 6th hour and after 12th hour was determined by the number of tablets taken (p=0,000), just like the estimated nausea level (p=0,000). Statistically significant positive correlation in estimated pain after 4th hour was determined by the number of tablets taken (p=0,006), just like the activities (p=0,014). Statistically significant positive correlation in estimated pain after 24th hour was determined by the number of tablets taken (p=0,000; positive), and by the duration of the surgery (p=0,028; negative). Statistically significant positive correlation in estimated pain after 48th hour and after 7 days was determined by the number of tablets taken (p=0,000). CONCLUSIONS: The application of local anesthetic, regardless of how it was applied, considerably reduces pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The application of local anesthetic by port or viscerally (P+V) considerably reduces pain compared to only by port (P) or only visceral (V) application in the time intervals of 2, 6, and 12 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The application of local anesthetic by port (P), with or without visceral (V), considerably reduces pain in the time intervals of 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours and 7 days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The best mobility was shown by group P+V after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Estimated nausea was most reduced in group P after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Group P+V presented the earliest return to regular activities. The best patients&acute; satisfaction grade with surgical treatment was shown by group P+V. Postoperative pain is most considerably positively correlated with the estimated nausea and pills taken, from the moment of patient&acute;s release from hospital to the first check-up.<br />&nbsp;</p>

<p>Cilj: Utvrditi funkcionalni i mentalni status pacijenata pre i posle medicinske rehabilitacije, a nakon operacije kuka kod osoba starije životne dobi primenom standardizovanih upitnika (SF36, Harris hip score, MMS, TUG, FES-I) . Materijal i metod:Istraživanje je bilo prospektivno i uzorak je činilo 96 pacijenata sa prethodnom operacijom kuka koji su u toku 18 meseci, od januara 2014., bili u rehabilitacionom programu na Klinici za medicinsku rehabilitaciju KCV. Kod svih pacijenata je registrovan: pol i starosna dob, kao i uzrok odnosno vrsta operativnog zahvata. Pacijenti su pregledani i anketirani sa svih 5 upitnika u tri vremenska trenutka: pre samog početka rehabilitacionog tretmana i na 3 i 6 meseci posle. SF-36 je generički merni obrazac koji se koristi za procenu kvaliteta života. Harris Hip Score (HHS) predstavlja merni instrument za procenu funkcionalnih parametara. Mini Mental State (MMS) se koristi kod procene mentalnog statusa. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) je efikasan metod procene pokretljivosti i funkcije lokomotornog sistema kod starijih pacijenata. Falls Efficacy Scale- International (FES-I) je test kojim se meri stepen zabrinutosti od pada. Metodom ponovljenih merenja analizirana su stanja pacijenata pre i posle medicinske rehabilitacije. Izvr&scaron;ena je i korelaciona analiza kori&scaron;ćenih upitnika, kao i univarijantna analiza u odnosu na vrstu operacije. Rezultati:Nakon medicinske rehabilitacije posle operacije kuka kod osoba starije životne dobi je značajno bolji ukupni fizički skor SF36: 29,0 / 38,7 / 46,3; kao i vrednost HHS skora 50,2 / 63,4 / 76,3; i TUG testa 31,3s / 19,6s / 13,6s; (pre rehabilitacije, 3m i 6m respektivno). Postoje statistički značajne korelacije ukupnog fizičkog domena SF36 i vrednosti Harris Hip, TUG i FES-I, kao i ukupnog mentalnog domena SF36 i MMS skora. Zadovoljstvo pacijenata rehablitacionim tretmanom je u korelaciji sa vrednostima funkcionalnih testova (Harris Hip Score), testom ustani kreni (TUG) i ukupnim fizičkim domenom upitnika SF36, kao i sa skorom FES-I. Zaključci: Kvalitet života i funkcionalna sposobnost operisanih pacijenata nakon medicinske rehabilitacije je značajno bolja kako u komparaciji stanja na tri meseca i na početku rehabilitacije tako i u komparaciji stanja na 6 meseci u odnosu na stanje na 3 meseca.</p> / <p>Objective: To determine the functional and mental status of patients before and after medical rehabilitation after hip surgery in elderly by using standardized questionnaires (SF36, Harris hip score, MMS, TUG, FES-I). Materials and methods:The study was prospective and the sample consisted of 96 patients with previous hip surgery that during the 18 months from January 2014, was in a rehabilitation program at the Department of medical rehabilitation KCV. For all patients registered sex and age, as well as the cause and type of surgery.Patients are screened and interviewed with all 5 of the questionnaire in three time points: before the start of the rehabilitation treatment and at 3 and 6 months after. SF-36 is a generic form that measurement is used to assess the quality of life. Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a measuring instrument for the assessment of functional parameters. Mini Mental State (MMS) used in the assessment of mental status. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is an effective method of evaluating the mobility and function of the musculoskeletal system in older patients.Falls Efficacy Scale- International (FES-I) is a test that measures the level of concern of falling. Method of repeated measurements were used to analyse condition of patients before and after medical rehabilitation. There was also a correlation analysis of used questionnaires, as well as the univariate analysis in relation to the type of surgery. Results: After medical rehabilitation after surgery of the hip in the elderly is significantly better overall physical SF36 score: 29.0 / 38.7 / 46.3; as well as the value of the HHS score of 50.2 / 63.4 / 76.3; and the TUG test 31,3s / 19,6s / 13,6s; (before rehabilitation, 3m and 6m respectively). There are statistically significant correlations of total physical domain SF36 and values Harris Hip, TUG and the FES-I, and the overall mental domain of SF36 and MMS score. Patient satisfaction with rehabilitation treatment is correlated with the values of functional tests (Harris Hip Score) test Up and go (TUG) and total physical domain SF36 questionnaires, as well as the FES-I. Conclusion: Quality of life and functional capacity of treated patients after medical rehabilitation significantly improved both in comparison to the situation in three months and at the beginning of rehabilitation as well as in comparison at 6 months compared to 3 months.</p>

Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten weisen häufig ein ästhetisches Defizit im Bereich der Nase auf und müssen sich nach Wachstumsabschluss nicht selten einer Nasenkorrektur unterziehen. Die in der Literatur publizierten Ergebnisse von Spaltnasenkorrekturen sind zum Teil kontrovers und bilden verschiedene Blickwinkel ab. Bewertungen von Patienten und Therapeuten unterscheiden sich mitunter erheblich. Ziel dieser retrospektiven Studie war es, zu ermitteln, welche funktionellen und ästhetischen Resultate mit Hilfe der Sekundärkorrektur der spaltbedingten Nasendysplasie zu erzielen sind und wie sich der Blickwinkel der Patienten von denen professioneller Juroren unterscheidet. Hierfür konnten 242 Patientinnen und Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten eingeschlossen werden, welche sich im Zeitraum vom 01.01.2001 bis 31.12.2013 an der Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie des Universitätsklinikums Leipzig einer sekundären Rhinoplastik unterzogen hatten. Aus Sicht der Patienten wurde hinsichtlich der Funktion in 82% der Fälle ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht. Bezüglich der Ästhetik beurteilten die Patienten das Ergebnis zu 74% als gut und zu 21% als moderat. Die identische Befragung der professionellen Jury ergab in 65% der Fälle die Einschätzung gut und in 26% der Fälle die Bewertung moderat. Die vergleichende statistische Analyse der Einschätzungen der beiden Kollektive ergab eine nur geringe Interrater-Reliabilität. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen, dass in der Mehrzahl der Fälle gute Resultate erzielbar sind. Die Bewertungen der Patienten und jene der Ärzte differieren dabei deutlich.

INTRODUÇÃO: O câncer de próstata (CaP) é o tipo mais comum entre os tumores malignos que afetam o homem. Dentre as opções terapêuticas para o tratamento precoce do CaP, destaca-se o tratamento cirúrgico com resultados satisfatórios de até 94% de cura nos casos localizados. A ressecção cirúrgica do CaP pode ser feita por três abordagens principais: prostatectomia radical retropúbica (PRR), prostatectomia radical laparoscópica (PRL) e mais recentemente a prostatectomia radical laparoscópica robô assistida (PRAR). Uma vez que existem várias alternativas terapêuticas para esse tipo de câncer, a qualidade de vida e satisfação relacionadas à avaliação, tornam-se muito importantes nos diferentes tipos de técnicas cirúrgicas. OBJETIVO: Comparar a qualidade de vida e o índice de satisfação nos pacientes submetidos a PRR e PRAR através de um estudo prospectivo e aleatorizado. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Através do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), 200 pacientes com diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma de próstata localizado, foram selecionados de forma aleatória para participarem do estudo, sendo então encaminhados entre março de 2010 a janeiro de 2011 para o Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz (HAOC) para realizar PRAR, ou para o Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), para a realização de PRR. Todos os pacientes foram seguidos clinicamente de maneira padrão. Utilizamos questionário SF-36 da seguinte forma: no pré-operatório e no pós-operatório de 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 e 24 meses, além de outro elaborado para avaliar a satisfação dos pacientes no pós operatório de 6, 12 e 18 meses. Os dados obtidos foram avaliados estatisticamente com nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Foram então aplicados os questionários em 200 pacientes submetidos às cirurgias (grupos homogêneos com 100 pacientes para PRR e 100 para PRAR). De acordo com os domínios de qualidade de vida, os escores médios dos aspectos físicos, aspectos emocionais e saúde mental só variaram estatisticamente entre os momentos de avaliação, sendo os grupos iguais entre si para estes domínios. De acordo com aspectos sociais houve diferença entre os grupos independente do momento de avaliação, sendo maior nos pacientes submetidos a cirurgia aberta (p = 0,016). O nível de escolaridade e a renda familiar dos pacientes que realizaram a cirurgia robótica são maiores que as dos pacientes que realizaram a cirurgia aberta (p = 0,044 e p = 0,029 respectivamente). De acordo com o grau de satisfação pós cirurgia, encontramos que os pacientes que fizeram cirurgia robótica apresentam um maior grau de satisfação com a cirurgia que aqueles submetidos a cirurgia aberta (p < 0,001). O que mais incomoda ou preocupa o paciente que realiza a cirurgia aberta é a disfunção erétil enquanto que nos pacientes que fazem à cirurgia robótica a preocupação se distribui entre cura, impotência e perda urinária. CONCLUSÃO: Demonstramos que a maioria dos aspectos de qualidade de vida são semelhantes entre os pacientes submetidos a PRR e PRAR com exceção dos aspectos sociais que foram maiores nos pacientes submetidos ao procedimento aberto, demonstramos ainda que o índice de satisfação dos pacientes é maior no procedimento robótico, entretanto a grande maioria dos pacientes realizariam o mesmo tratamento quando questionados / INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumors that affect man. Among the treatment options for early treatment of PCa, stands out the surgical treatment with satisfactory results, achieving cure results of up to 94% in localized cases. Surgical resection of PCa can be done through three main approaches, which are radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and more recently robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP). Since there are several alternative therapies for this cancer, quality of life and satisfaction related to the evaluation of different types of surgery became very important. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the two most widely used techniques: RRP and RALRP through a prospective randomized study, checking the satisfaction and quality of life in patients who have undergone these treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The choice of surgical approach of the patient occurred randomly and the patients were selected through the Unified Health System (SUS) and sent to the Oswaldo Cruz Hospital (HAOC) for RALRP (robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy) or sent to the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (ICESP) for RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy), between March 2010 and January 2011. All patients were followed clinically in a standard way through a questionnaire, SF-36 and a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction. It was also verified the level of regret in post-surgery within 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months and the level of satisfaction was verified at 6 12 and 18 months post-surgery. The data were statistically evaluated with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: We then applied the questionnaires in 200 patients who underwent surgery, and 100 patients who underwent RRP and 100 patients who underwent RALRP. The groups were quite homogeneous. According to the domains of quality of life, the average scores of physical, emotional and mental health only varied significantly among time points of evaluation, and the groups were equal to each other for these domains. According to the social aspects there were differences between the groups regardless of the time of evaluation, being higher in patients who underwent open surgery (p = 0.016). The education level and family income of patients who underwent robotic surgery are higher than of patients who underwent open surgery (p = 0.044 and p = 0.029 respectively). According to the level of satisfaction post-surgery, we realized that robotic surgery patients have a higher level of satisfaction about the surgery than those undergone open surgery (p < 0.001). The most signicant thing that bothers or worries the open surgery patients is sexual impotence while in robotic surgery patients, the concern is distributed among cure, impotence and urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that most aspects of quality of life are similar among patients undergoing RRP and RALRP except social aspects that were higher in patients undergone open surgery. We further demonstrated that the rate of satisfaction is higher in the robotic procedure patients. However, when questioned, the vast majority of patients would do the same treatment

Submitted by PPG Pediatria e Sa?de da Crian?a (pediatria-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-17T17:07:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAC?A?O_ALESSANDRA Homologada.pdf: 2515370 bytes, checksum: ad16338aa10d94f13cf00eb3c4fe55c1 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-28T18:42:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAC?A?O_ALESSANDRA Homologada.pdf: 2515370 bytes, checksum: ad16338aa10d94f13cf00eb3c4fe55c1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-28T18:44:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAC?A?O_ALESSANDRA Homologada.pdf: 2515370 bytes, checksum: ad16338aa10d94f13cf00eb3c4fe55c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Introduction: Measures of quality assessment in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) are generally related to clinical parameters. However, parental satisfaction is also considered an important indicator. Satisfaction surveys are already carried out frequently, but the questionnaires are not evaluated in relation to validity and reliability. In the Netherlands, the Empowerment of Parents in the Intensive Care 30 (EMPATHIC-30) questionnaire was developed to assess parental satisfaction in UTIO. In Brazil, validated questionnaires were not found for this purpose, so our aim is to translate, culturally adapt and validate the content of EMPATHIC-30 to evaluate parents' satisfaction in Brazilian PICUs. Methods: : the translation and cultural adaptation was carried out according to the protocol of the translation and cultural adaptation group of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic Research - ISPOR 2005. The content validation was carried out by a committee of experts. After that, the mean and standard deviation (SD) for all items were calculated, and the content validity coefficient (CVC) for each item and for the instrument as a whole. Conclusion: EMPATHIC-30 was translated and adapted culturally to the Brazilian population. Validation demonstrated a total above-average CVC, confirming the validity of the instrument content. / Introdu??o: As medidas de avalia??o da qualidade em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pedi?tricas (UTIP) s?o geralmente relacionadas a par?metros cl?nicos. Contudo, a satisfa??o dos pais tamb?m ? considerada um indicador importante. Pesquisas de satisfa??o j? s?o realizadas com frequ?ncia, por?m os question?rios n?o s?o avaliados em rela??o ? validade e ? confiabilidade. Na Holanda, foi desenvolvido o question?rio Empowerment of Parents in the Intensive Care 30 (EMPATHIC-30) para avaliar a satisfa??o dos pais em UTIP. No Brasil, n?o foram encontrados question?rios validados para este fim, desta forma, nosso objetivo ? traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e validar o conte?do do EMPATHIC-30 para avaliar a satisfa??o dos pais em UTIP brasileiras. M?todos: a tradu??o e adapta??o cultural foi realizada conforme protocolo do grupo de tradu??o e adapta??o cultural da Sociedade Internacional para Pesquisas Farmacoecon?micas ? ISPOR 2005. A valida??o do conte?do foi realizada por uma comiss?o de especialistas. Ap?s foram calculadas a m?dia e Desvio Padr?o (DP) para todos os itens, e o coeficiente de validade de conte?do (CVC) para cada item e para o instrumento como um todo. Resultados: na fase de adapta??o transcultural, as frases foram adaptadas de acordo com a sintaxe brasileira e sofreram poucas modifica??es. Na valida??o de conte?do, o CVC foi abaixo da m?dia em tr?s itens, dois foram mantidos no instrumento e um foi exclu?do. Conclus?o: o EMPATHIC-30 foi traduzido e adaptado culturalmente para a popula??o brasileira. A valida??o demonstrou um CVC total acima da m?dia, confirmando a validade do conte?do do instrumento.

Objetivo: Identificar as contribuições tecnológicas do processador de fala Freedom® para pacientes implantados com Nucleus 22® e a satisfação dos usuários com a nova tecnologia. Entre os novos recursos disponíveis, foram analisados o efeito da tabela de alocação de frequências, o T-SPL e C-SPL e o ajuste de pré-processamento do som (ADRO®). Material: Este estudo foi prospectivo e exploratório. Foram incluídos adolescentes e adultos implantados com Nucleus 22® no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, usuários efetivos do processador de fala Spectra®, com alguma percepção de frases em contexto fechado e sem experiência anterior com a nova tecnologia. Foram selecionados 17 pacientes, entre as idades de 15 e 82 anos, e implantados há mais de oito anos. Para determinar a contribuição do Freedom®, os limiares auditivos e os testes de percepção de fala foram realizados com o último mapa utilizado com o Spectra® e comparados os mapas criados com o Freedom®. Para identificar o efeito da tabela de alocação de frequências, ambos os mapas convertidos (mesma tabela) e atualizados (tabela nova) foram programados. A tabela escolhida foi mantida, e foram realizados três mapas com diferentes parâmetros: o programa 1 (P1) com T-SPL de 30 dB e do C-SPL de 70 dB, programa 2 (P2) com T-SPL de 25 dB e do C-SPL de 65 dB, e o programa 3 (P3) com ADRO®. A ordem de apresentação dos mapas e dos testes foi randomizada. Para avaliar a satisfação com seus dispositivos auditivos foram utilizados os questionários SADL e APHAB após um mês e um ano de uso do Freedom®. Resultados: A contribuição do processador de fala Freedom® para pacientes usuários do Nucleus 22® foi estatisticamente superior em comparação com o Spectra® em todos os testes de percepção da fala e em todos os limiares audiométricos, tanto individualmente quanto em média, com exceção de 8000 Hz. Em relação à escolha da tabela de frequência, 64,7% dos pacientes (n=11) mantiveram o mapa com a tabela de frequências do Spectra®. Comparando os mapas com diferentes T-SPL e C-SPL, houve diferença estatística tanto nos limiares audiométricos de 500, 1000, 1500 e 2000 Hz quanto na média. Não houve diferença estatística entre os testes de fala com ou sem o uso do ADRO®. Os questionários de satisfação mostraram uma melhora estatisticamente significativa, apenas na subescala que avalia o desempenho em ambiente ruidoso e uso do telefone. Conclusão: A tecnologia contribuiu no desempenho de percepção de fala e nos limiares audiométricos dos pacientes usuários de Nucleus22®. A maioria manteve a tabela de frequência original. As mudanças nos parâmetros de T-SPL e C-SPL mostraram uma melhora dos limiares audiométricos nas frequências principais da fala. As diferenças significantes foram sutis nos questionários de satisfação, demonstrando que os pacientes já estavam adaptados e satisfeitos com o implante coclear / Objective: To identify the technological contributions of the Freedom® speech processor to the patients implanted with Nucleus 22® and the satisfaction of users of the new technology. Among the new features available, we focused on the effect of the frequency allocation table, the T-SPL and C-SPL and the pre-processing gain adjustments (ADRO®). Methods: This study was prospective and exploratory. It included teenage and adult patients implanted with Nucleus 22® who effectively used the implant with no previous experience with the new technology and had at least some speech recognition on a closed set with the Spectra® processor. Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria, ranging in age from 15 to 82 years and deployed for over 8 years. To determine the contribution of the Freedom®, thresholds and speech perception tests were performed with the last map used with the Spectra® and the maps created for Freedom®. To identify the effect of the frequency allocation table, both converted (same table) and upgraded (new table) maps were programmed. The table selected is maintained, and maps were performed with three different parameters: the first program (P1) was programmed with 30 dB T-SPL and 70 dB C-SPL; the second program (P2) with was programmed with 25 dB T-SPL and 65 dB C-SPL; and the program 3 (P3) with ADRO®. The order of presentation of the maps and the testing was randomized. To assess satisfaction were used SADL and APHAB after one moth and one year of using the Freedom®. Results: The contribution of the Freedom® speech processor to patients with the Nucleus 22® was statistically superior compared to the Spectra® in all tests of speech perception and in all audiometric thresholds, both individually and on average, except for 8000 Hz. Regarding the choice of a frequency allocation table, 64.7% of patients (n=11) maintained the same map that had been used with the Spectra® processor. The sound field threshold was statistically significant at 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 Hz with 25 dB T-SPL/ 65 dB C-SPL. The patients\' satisfaction there was a statistically significant improvement, only in the sub-scale of speech in noise abilities and telephone use. Conclusions: The Freedom® technology improved the performance of patients with the Nucleus 22®. Most of the patients retained the original frequency table. The changes in the parameters of T-SPL and C-SPL showed an improvement in the audiometric thresholds for the main frequencies of speech. Significant differences were subtle in questionnaires of satisfaction, demonstrating that patients were already adapted and satisfied with the cochlear implant

Estudo qualitativo do tipo exploratório-descritivo acerca da aplicabilidade do resultado da pesquisa de satisfação como ferramenta de avaliação da qualidade dos serviços de saúde. O objetivo geral do estudo consistiu em analisar a utilização dos resultados da pesquisa de satisfação dos usuários pelas chefias de enfermagem das unidades de internação de um hospital universitário. Os objetivos específicos foram relatar os resultados da pesquisa de satisfação dos usuários das unidades de internação; descrever a opinião das chefias acerca da contribuição que a pesquisa de satisfação implantada no hospital traz para o atendimento ao usuário; conhecer as estratégias utilizadas pelas chefias de enfermagem a fim de ter acesso aos resultados da pesquisa de satisfação, bem como o modo pelo qual os resultados são transmitidos à sua equipe de trabalho; e, por fim, identificar as ações implementadas nas unidades a partir dos resultados da pesquisa de satisfação. Os dados foram coletados em duas etapas no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. A primeira consistiu em análise documental, com base em consulta dos dados do sistema de informações gerenciais do referido hospital, que possibilitaram conhecer os resultados da pesquisa de satisfação das unidades de internação, objetos de investigação, no período de outubro de 2011 a março de 2012. Os achados demonstram que os usuários estão, em geral, satisfeitos com os cuidados de enfermagem e com o atendimento prestado durante a sua internação. A outra etapa da coleta consistiu em entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas em maio e junho de 2012, com 14 enfermeiras, cujos dados obtidos foram submetidos à técnica de análise de conteúdo temática e agrupadas em quatro categorias: a comunicação como forma de transmissão das informações para a equipe de enfermagem; a contribuição da pesquisa de satisfação do usuário para o atendimento em saúde; mudanças implementadas nas unidades a partir dos resultados da pesquisa; a influência da pesquisa de satisfação na avaliação de desempenho da equipe de enfermagem. Os resultados apontam que a pesquisa de satisfação do usuário é verificada de diversas formas pelas enfermeiras, as quais procuram também repassar à sua equipe de trabalho. A comunicação tem uma função primordial, pois favorece a troca de informações e a interlocução dentro da equipe de enfermagem. A pesquisa é entendida pelas enfermeiras como uma ferramenta de escuta, que continuamente capta a voz do usuário. Quanto às mudanças já implementadas nas unidades, as enfermeiras relataram que já foram realizadas modificações advindas de reinvindicações, as quais envolvem o ambiente, a estrutura e outros aspectos relacionados à rotina da unidade. Um ponto levantado pelas enfermeiras refere-se à influência do resultado da pesquisa de satisfação na gestão de desempenho da equipe de enfermagem, a qual é utilizada para identificar como está sendo a atuação de cada profissional no trabalho, gerenciando os elogios e críticas vinculados à equipe. Acredita-se que os estudos sobre a satisfação do usuário são fundamentais para garantir a avaliação da qualidade do serviço oferecido pelas instituições, além de auxiliar gestores na tomada de decisões, bem como fornecer um panorama do serviço. / This is a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study about the applicability of satisfaction survey results as a tool for evaluating the quality of health service. The general objective of this study consisted in analyzing the use of the satisfaction survey results by chief nurses from the intern units of a university hospital. The specific objectives were: to report intern unit user’s satisfaction survey results; to describe the chief nurses’ opinions about the contribution that the satisfaction survey implanted in the hospital brings to user service; to know the strategies used by the chief nurses in having access to the satisfaction survey results, as well as the way the results are transmitted to the work team; and, finally, to identify the actions implemented in the units, based on the satisfaction survey results. Data collection was carried out at the Clinics Hospital of Porto Alegre/Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre in two stages. The first consisted of documental analysis, based on consulting the hospital’s managerial information data, which made it possible to know the satisfaction survey results of the intern units, objects of investigation, during the period of October 2011 to March 2012. The findings demonstrate that users are, in general, satisfied with the nursing services and with the attendance given them while admitted to the hospital. The other stage of data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, given in May and June of 2012, with 14 nurses, whose obtained data were submitted to the technique of thematic analysis and grouped in four categories: communication as a form of transmitting information to the nursing team; the contribution that the user satisfaction survey has on health services; alterations based on survey results, implemented in the units; influence that the satisfaction survey has upon the evaluation of the nursing team’s performance. The results show that the user satisfaction survey is checked in a variety of ways by the nurses, whom also seek to repass these results to their immediate team. The communication has a main function since it favors the exchange of information and dialogue within the nursing team. Nurses understand the survey to be a listening device, that continuously captures the user’s voice. In reference to the changes already implemented in the units, the nurses reported that they were made in result of the claims involving environment, structure and other aspects related to the unit’s routine. A point raised by the nurses refers to the influence that the satisfaction survey results have on the nursing team’s performance management, which uses it to identify the ongoing performance of each working professional, administering compliments and criticisms related to the team. It is believed that the studies about user satisfaction are fundamental to guarantee the evaluation of service quality offered by the institutions, besides to assist supervisors on making decisions, as well as to provide a service panorama. / Estudio cualitativo del tipo exploratorio-descriptivo sobre la aplicabilidad del resultado de la encuesta de satisfacción como herramienta de evaluación de la calidad de los servicios de salud. El objetivo general del estudio consistió en analizar el uso de los resultados de la encuesta de satisfacción de los usuarios por las jefaturas de enfermería de las unidades de hospitalización de un hospital universitario. Los objetivos específicos fueron los de relatar los resultados de la encuesta de satisfacción de los usuarios de las unidades de hospitalización; describir la opinión de las jefaturas sobre la contribución que ésta trae para la atención al usuario; conocer las estrategias usadas por las jefaturas de enfermería con el propósito de tener acceso a los resultados de la encuesta de satisfacción, así como el modo por el cual los resultados se transmiten a su equipo de trabajo; y, por fin, identificar las acciones implementadas en las unidades a partir de los resultados de la encuesta de satisfacción. Los datos fueron colectados en dos etapas en el Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. La primera consistió en un análisis documental, basado en consulta a datos del sistema de informaciones gerenciales del referido hospital, que posibilitaron conocer los resultados de la encuesta de satisfacción de las unidades de hospitalización objetos de investigación, en el período de octubre del 2011 a marzo del 2012. Los descubrimientos demuestran que los usuarios están, por lo general, satisfechos con los cuidados de enfermería y con la atención prestada durante su hospitalización. La otra etapa de la colecta consistió en entrevistas semiestructuradas, realizadas en mayo y junio del 2012, con 14 enfermeras, cuyos datos obtenidos se sometieron a la técnica de análisis de contenido temático y agrupadas en cuatro categorías: la comunicación como forma de transmisión de las informaciones para el equipo de enfermería; la contribución de la encuesta de satisfacción del usuario para la atención en la salud; cambios implementados en las unidades a partir de los resultados de la encuesta; la influencia de ésta en la evaluación del desempeño del equipo de enfermería. Los resultados apuntan que la encuesta de satisfacción del usuario se ve de distintas formas por las enfermeras, las cuales también buscan repasar su equipo de trabajo. La comunicación tiene una función primordial, ya que favorece el intercambio de informaciones y la interlocución dentro del equipo de enfermería. La encuesta es entendida por las enfermeras como una herramienta de escucha, que continuamente capta la voz del usuario. En relación a los cambios ya implementados en las unidades, las enfermeras relataron que ya se han realizado modificaciones a partir de reinvindicaciones, las cuales involucran el ambiente, la estructura y otras relacionadas a la rutina de la unidad. Un punto levantado por las enfermeras se refiere a la influencia del resultado de la encuesta de satisfacción en la gestión de desempeño del equipo de enfermería, la cual se usa para identificar como está siendo la actuación de cada profesional en el trabajo, administrando los elogios y críticas vinculados al equipo. Se cree que los estudios sobre la satisfacción del usuario sean fundamentales para garantizar la evaluación de la calidad del servicio ofrecido por las instituciones, además de ayudar a los gestores en la toma de decisiones, así como proveer un panorama sobre el servicio.

No description available.

Ecole de Santé Publique <p>Université Libre de Bruxelles <p>Academic Year 2010-2011<p><p>Al-Awa, Bahjat<p><p>Impact of Hospital Accreditation on Patients' Safety and Quality Indicators<p><p>Dissertation Summary <p><p>I.\ / Doctorat en Sciences / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished