GROFOVÁ, Renata. Conditional Sentences to Imprisonment with Supervision - Its Application and Practice of Performance in Terms of the Probation and Mediation Service. Praha: Faculty of Arts of Charles University, 2013. 82 s. Master Degree Thesis. The aim of the Master's thesis is to ascertain how the supervision of conditionally convicted persons is applied and fulfilled. The theoretical part of the thesis analyses the system of the various forms of punishment. The key part of the thesis focuses on Suspended Sentences with surveillance and the application in practice of this form of punishment. The thesis also includes a chapter about the Probation and Mediation Service. The practical part describes the process of examination and the evaluations of the results. The last part of the thesis contains an evaluation of the gained findings and a proposal how to streamline the above mentioned form of sentence in order to make it more effective. The research methods chosen are a research questionnaire survey and the analysis of records. The research sample was compiled out of the employees of the Probation and Mediation Service in Prague and the files on record of the Probation and Mediation Service in Prague. Key words: criminal penalty, Probation and Mediation Service, supervision, criminal offense, offender

Essa dissertação tem como objetivo apresentar uma análise acerca do comportamento do delinqüente em relação ao quantum de pena previsto no Código Penal brasileiro, possuindo como fundamento a teoria economicista do crime e a legislação penal apresentada. Parte-se, em um primeiro momento, para uma explicação da evolução da sanção penal, destacando as teorias que explicam as finalidades das penas. Dá-se ênfase a dois grandes grupos teóricos: teorias absolutas da pena, que utilizam a pena como um juízo de reprovação/retribuição, e as teorias relativas da pena, que fazem da sanção penal um instrumento para impedir que novos crimes aconteçam (prevenção). Na seqüência, apresentase o modelo econômico básico do crime, desenvolvido por Becker (1968) e seus fundamentos teóricos em Beccaria (1764), em Bentham (1781) e na teoria da escolha racional. Esclarece-se que o modelo economicista do crime enquadra-se entre as teorias relativas da pena (prevenção). Ressalta-se que o instituto da pena é um dos principais mecanismos que o Estado possui para alterar o comportamento de potenciais infratores. Explica-se que o sistema criminal brasileiro estabelece como finalidade da pena tanto a reprovação quanto a prevenção. No entanto, considerando que o delinqüente é um ser racional, capaz de antecipar a quantidade de pena a que estaria sujeito caso fosse capturado e condenado, conclui-se que a pena, no contexto da legislação brasileira, perde a sua finalidade precípua de prevenção, uma vez que o agente criminoso constata que seu custo “real” é menor que seu custo “potencial”. Dessa maneira, embora no sistema criminal nacional, a pena possua como fim a reprovação e a prevenção, percebe-se reduzidas as suas características de prevenção, fazendo realmente do crime uma outra atividade, passível de ser realizada por aqueles que assim desejarem. / The goal of this work is to present an analysis concerning the criminal's behavior in relation to the quantity of punishment foreseen in the Brazilian Penal Code, having as fundaments the economic theory of crime and the penal legislation presented. In a first moment, it does an explanation of the evolution of the penal sanction, pointing out the theories that explain the purposes of the punishment. It does emphasis for two great theoretical groups: absolute theories of the punishment, that it uses the penalty as retribution, and the relative theories of the punishment, that it utilizes the penal sanction as an instrument to impede that new crimes happen (prevention). In the sequence, it presents the economic basic model of crime, developed by Becker (1968) and their theoretical fundaments in Beccaria (1764), in Bentham (1781) and in the theory of the rational choice. It is explained that the economic model of crime is framed among the relative theories of the punishment (prevention). It shows that the institute of the punishment is one of the main mechanisms that the State uses to alter the potentials offenders' behavior. It is explained that the Brazilian criminal system establishes as purpose of the punishment as much the retribution as the prevention. However, considering that the criminal is a rational being, capable to anticipate the amount of punishment that would be subject case was captured and convict, it concludes that the penality, in the context of the Brazilian legislation, loses its essential purpose of prevention, once the criminal agent verifies that his "real" cost is smaller than his "potential" cost. In this way, even though in the national criminal system, the punishment has as purpose the retribution and the prevention, it is possible to note that the characteristics of the prevention have been reduced, making the crime as one other activity, susceptible to be accomplished by those who want to do that.

Essa dissertação tem como objetivo apresentar uma análise acerca do comportamento do delinqüente em relação ao quantum de pena previsto no Código Penal brasileiro, possuindo como fundamento a teoria economicista do crime e a legislação penal apresentada. Parte-se, em um primeiro momento, para uma explicação da evolução da sanção penal, destacando as teorias que explicam as finalidades das penas. Dá-se ênfase a dois grandes grupos teóricos: teorias absolutas da pena, que utilizam a pena como um juízo de reprovação/retribuição, e as teorias relativas da pena, que fazem da sanção penal um instrumento para impedir que novos crimes aconteçam (prevenção). Na seqüência, apresentase o modelo econômico básico do crime, desenvolvido por Becker (1968) e seus fundamentos teóricos em Beccaria (1764), em Bentham (1781) e na teoria da escolha racional. Esclarece-se que o modelo economicista do crime enquadra-se entre as teorias relativas da pena (prevenção). Ressalta-se que o instituto da pena é um dos principais mecanismos que o Estado possui para alterar o comportamento de potenciais infratores. Explica-se que o sistema criminal brasileiro estabelece como finalidade da pena tanto a reprovação quanto a prevenção. No entanto, considerando que o delinqüente é um ser racional, capaz de antecipar a quantidade de pena a que estaria sujeito caso fosse capturado e condenado, conclui-se que a pena, no contexto da legislação brasileira, perde a sua finalidade precípua de prevenção, uma vez que o agente criminoso constata que seu custo “real” é menor que seu custo “potencial”. Dessa maneira, embora no sistema criminal nacional, a pena possua como fim a reprovação e a prevenção, percebe-se reduzidas as suas características de prevenção, fazendo realmente do crime uma outra atividade, passível de ser realizada por aqueles que assim desejarem. / The goal of this work is to present an analysis concerning the criminal's behavior in relation to the quantity of punishment foreseen in the Brazilian Penal Code, having as fundaments the economic theory of crime and the penal legislation presented. In a first moment, it does an explanation of the evolution of the penal sanction, pointing out the theories that explain the purposes of the punishment. It does emphasis for two great theoretical groups: absolute theories of the punishment, that it uses the penalty as retribution, and the relative theories of the punishment, that it utilizes the penal sanction as an instrument to impede that new crimes happen (prevention). In the sequence, it presents the economic basic model of crime, developed by Becker (1968) and their theoretical fundaments in Beccaria (1764), in Bentham (1781) and in the theory of the rational choice. It is explained that the economic model of crime is framed among the relative theories of the punishment (prevention). It shows that the institute of the punishment is one of the main mechanisms that the State uses to alter the potentials offenders' behavior. It is explained that the Brazilian criminal system establishes as purpose of the punishment as much the retribution as the prevention. However, considering that the criminal is a rational being, capable to anticipate the amount of punishment that would be subject case was captured and convict, it concludes that the penality, in the context of the Brazilian legislation, loses its essential purpose of prevention, once the criminal agent verifies that his "real" cost is smaller than his "potential" cost. In this way, even though in the national criminal system, the punishment has as purpose the retribution and the prevention, it is possible to note that the characteristics of the prevention have been reduced, making the crime as one other activity, susceptible to be accomplished by those who want to do that.

Essa dissertação tem como objetivo apresentar uma análise acerca do comportamento do delinqüente em relação ao quantum de pena previsto no Código Penal brasileiro, possuindo como fundamento a teoria economicista do crime e a legislação penal apresentada. Parte-se, em um primeiro momento, para uma explicação da evolução da sanção penal, destacando as teorias que explicam as finalidades das penas. Dá-se ênfase a dois grandes grupos teóricos: teorias absolutas da pena, que utilizam a pena como um juízo de reprovação/retribuição, e as teorias relativas da pena, que fazem da sanção penal um instrumento para impedir que novos crimes aconteçam (prevenção). Na seqüência, apresentase o modelo econômico básico do crime, desenvolvido por Becker (1968) e seus fundamentos teóricos em Beccaria (1764), em Bentham (1781) e na teoria da escolha racional. Esclarece-se que o modelo economicista do crime enquadra-se entre as teorias relativas da pena (prevenção). Ressalta-se que o instituto da pena é um dos principais mecanismos que o Estado possui para alterar o comportamento de potenciais infratores. Explica-se que o sistema criminal brasileiro estabelece como finalidade da pena tanto a reprovação quanto a prevenção. No entanto, considerando que o delinqüente é um ser racional, capaz de antecipar a quantidade de pena a que estaria sujeito caso fosse capturado e condenado, conclui-se que a pena, no contexto da legislação brasileira, perde a sua finalidade precípua de prevenção, uma vez que o agente criminoso constata que seu custo “real” é menor que seu custo “potencial”. Dessa maneira, embora no sistema criminal nacional, a pena possua como fim a reprovação e a prevenção, percebe-se reduzidas as suas características de prevenção, fazendo realmente do crime uma outra atividade, passível de ser realizada por aqueles que assim desejarem. / The goal of this work is to present an analysis concerning the criminal's behavior in relation to the quantity of punishment foreseen in the Brazilian Penal Code, having as fundaments the economic theory of crime and the penal legislation presented. In a first moment, it does an explanation of the evolution of the penal sanction, pointing out the theories that explain the purposes of the punishment. It does emphasis for two great theoretical groups: absolute theories of the punishment, that it uses the penalty as retribution, and the relative theories of the punishment, that it utilizes the penal sanction as an instrument to impede that new crimes happen (prevention). In the sequence, it presents the economic basic model of crime, developed by Becker (1968) and their theoretical fundaments in Beccaria (1764), in Bentham (1781) and in the theory of the rational choice. It is explained that the economic model of crime is framed among the relative theories of the punishment (prevention). It shows that the institute of the punishment is one of the main mechanisms that the State uses to alter the potentials offenders' behavior. It is explained that the Brazilian criminal system establishes as purpose of the punishment as much the retribution as the prevention. However, considering that the criminal is a rational being, capable to anticipate the amount of punishment that would be subject case was captured and convict, it concludes that the penality, in the context of the Brazilian legislation, loses its essential purpose of prevention, once the criminal agent verifies that his "real" cost is smaller than his "potential" cost. In this way, even though in the national criminal system, the punishment has as purpose the retribution and the prevention, it is possible to note that the characteristics of the prevention have been reduced, making the crime as one other activity, susceptible to be accomplished by those who want to do that.

Il est traditionnellement admis que le droit pénal a pour fonction de défendre l’intérêt général, ce qui explique le rôle prééminent de l’État tout au long du processus répressif. Pourtant, l’analyse du droit positif met en exergue une extension de la fonction normative du droit pénal en direction des intérêts privés, individuels ou collectifs qui ne peut que bouleverser les fonctions traditionnellement assignées à la responsabilité pénale et à la sanction pénale qui l’accompagne. Parce que les intérêts privés concurrencent l’intérêt général dans l’ordre des valeurs protégées par les textes d’incrimination, les règles de la responsabilité pénale et les fonctions de la sanction pénale sont désormais sollicitées pour résoudre des litiges entre particuliers, et assurer la réparation du dommage causé par l’infraction. Parce que la configuration des acteurs au procès pénal n’est que le reflet des valeurs protégées par la norme pénale, l’introduction des intérêts privés dans le champ de protection de la loi pénale a naturellement entraîné une mutation de la répartition traditionnelle des rôles processuels du juge et des parties dans le procès pénal au profit des parties privées. Même si cette mutation a trouvé dans l’influence du modèle européen de procès équitable le terreau favorable à une telle évolution, celui-ci n’a joué qu’un rôle catalyseur dans l’ascension des parties dans la maîtrise de la direction de l’instance pénale comme dans la maîtrise de la matière litigieuse ; la véritable cause de ces évolutions. / It is traditionally allowed that the criminal law has as a function to defend the general interest, which explains the preeminent role of the State throughout the repressive process. However, the analysis of the substantive law puts forward an extension of the normative function of the criminal law in the direction of the private interests, individual or collectives which can only upset the functions traditionally assigned with the criminal responsibility and with the penal sanction which accompanies it. Because the private interests compete with the general interest in the order of the values protected by the texts from incrimination, the rules of the criminal responsibility and the functions of the penal sanction from now on are requested to solve litigations between individuals, and to ensure the compensation for the damage caused by the infringement. Because the configuration of the actors to the criminal trial is only the reflection of the values protected by the penal standard, the introduction of the private interests into the field of protection of the criminal law naturally involved a change of the traditional distribution of the processual roles of the judge and parts in the criminal trial with the profit as of private parts. Even if this change found in the influence of the European model of fair trial the compost favorable to such an evolution, this one played only one catalyst part in the rise of the parts in the control of the direction of the penal authority as in the control of the litigious matter; the true cause of these evolutions, it is the privatization of penal repression.