Gegenstand dieser Dissertation war die Frage, wie Menschenaffen physische Beziehungen zwischen Objekten verstehen. In der ersten Studie (STUDIE I) wurden drei Menschenaffenarten und Kinder mit einem Problem konfrontiert, dessen Lösung die Verwendung eines flüssigen Werkzeugs (Wasser) erforderte. Schimpansen und Kinder entdeckten einsichtsvoll eine Lösung, um an eine Belohnung (Erdnuss) zu gelangen, die sich außerhalb ihrer Reichweite befand. Verschiedene Kontrollbedingungen untermauerten die Zielgerichtetheit des Verhaltens der erfolgreichen Schimpansen. Die getesteten Gorillas und die Orang-Utans konnten die Aufgabe nicht lösen. Zwei weitere Studien widmeten sich der Frage, ob Schimpansen Gewicht als kausal relevantes Unterscheidungsmerkmal nutzen können. In STUDIE II war es Aufgabe der Schimpansen aus insgesamt fünf in Form und Größe identischen Flaschen diejenige zu finden, die als einzige Fruchtsaft enthielt, wobei diese sich entweder durch ihr Gewicht (kausales Merkmal) oder durch ihre Farbmarkierung (arbiträres Merkmal) von den anderen Flaschen unterschied. Es zeigte sich, dass die Testtiere schnell lernten, den kausal relevanten Hinweisreiz zu nutzen, dies ihnen jedoch anhand des arbiträren Hinweisreizes nicht gelang. In STUDIE III waren Schimpansen entweder Zeuge einer kausal informativen Ereignisabfolge (hervorgerufen durch die physische Wirkung des Futters) oder einer rein arbiträren (hervorgerufen durch ein Ereignis, dass in keinerlei kausalem Zusammenhang zum Futter stand). Auch hier waren die Tiere nur dann erfolgreich, wenn die Testsituation kausale Rückschlüsse ermöglichte. Zusammenfassend lassen sich die Daten dahingehend interpretieren, dass – ähnlich wie bei Menschen – die kausale Kognition bei Schimpansen nicht nur auf rein perzeptuellen Informationen, sondern zudem auf strukturellen Abstraktionen ihrer physischen Umgebung beruht. / This thesis focused on the topic of primates’ understanding of physical object–object relations. In the first study (STUDY I), three great ape species and human children were confronted with a problem that required the use of a liquid tool in order to access a reward (peanut). Without any training, some chimpanzees and human children found the solution in an insightful way. Several control conditions confirmed the goal directedness of chimpanzees’ behavior. None of the tested gorilla and orangutan subjects were successful. The next two studies addressed chimpanzees’ notion of weight as a causally relevant object property. In STUDY II, chimpanzees were required to detect a bottle containing juice from five opaque bottles of equal shape and size. The bottle of juice differed either by weight (causal property) or by color (arbitrary property) from the other bottles. It turned out that subjects readily inferred the bottle of juice from its causally relevant property but were not able to use the arbitrary cue during the course of the experiment. In STUDY III chimpanzees had to infer the location of a reward (banana) by passively watching an external procedure. Two kinds of event sequences were presented: a causally informative sequence (derived from the physical effect of the reward) and a completely arbitrary sequence (derived from an action unrelated to the reward). Again, chimpanzees performed more correctly when the situation allowed for causal judgments but failed to make useful inferences when the underlying logic was arbitrary. Taking together all of the current data, I suggest that—similar to in humans—chimpanzees’ causal cognition is based not only on perceptual information but also on structural abstraction about their physical environment.

From October-December 2013, we conducted a study of the newly discovered primate species lesula, Cercopithecus lomamiensis, in the DR Congo. We placed 41 camera traps inside a 4 km2 grid outside the proposed Lomami National Park (LNP). We compared an analysis of 140 lesula events over 1,683 camera trap days from the heavily hunted Okulu area to a pilot study (38 events over 462 camera trap days) at the Losekola study site within the LNP. Our data show an unexpected result: capture probability of lesula (0.08) is the same at both the hunted and non-hunted sites. This is in contrast to the sharp decline in capture probability of all other medium-to-large terrestrial mammals at the Okulu site. These findings suggest lesula’s cryptic behavior is an important adaptation buffering the species from the impacts of hunting. This study also expands knowledge on minimum group size, terrestriality, diet, and times of activity. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2015. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

Este trabalho teve como objetivo estudar o desenvolvimento do comportamento manipulativo em macacos-prego (Cebus apella) em semiliberdade, com ênfase na ontogênese do comportamento de quebra de cocos. A coleta de dados foi realizada ao longo de dois anos e meio, o que permitiu um acompanhamento longitudinal dos filhotes com idade inferior a dois anos. As dinâmicas sociais relacionadas à aprendizagem de quebra também foram estudadas. Os resultados mostram que os macacos começaram a manipular objetos com cerca de um mês de idade e conseguiram quebrar cocos com sucesso a partir dos dois anos. Eles observaram seus co-específicos quebrando cocos, sendo que os maiores observadores foram os imaturos, especialmente os juvenis. Os alvos de observação foram preferencialmente aqueles macacos que apresentaram uma maior taxa de quebra. Durante a observação de co-específicos, houve raros registros de agonismo, ou seja, há grande tolerância social. Houve intercalação entre brincadeira e quebra de cocos por macacos imaturos. Grande parte da aquisição do comportamento de quebra de cocos pode ser atribuída às experiências individuais, mas também há oportunidades para que ocorra a aprendizagem social por meio de observação direta do co-específico proficiente, já que os observadores são bem tolerados. / The objective of this work was to study the manipulative behavior of semifree-ranging tufted-capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), focusing on the ontogenesis of nutcracking behavior. Data collection was done during a period of two years and a half, and so, a longitudinal study with monkeys under two-years old could be performed. Social dynamics related to nutcracking learning were also studied. The results show that the monkeys started manipulating objects when they were around a month of age, but only subjects over two years of age were able to sucessfully crack nuts. They observed conspecific nutcracking: immature monkeys were the main observers, especially juveniles. The main targets of observation were the monkeys who had the highest nutcracking rate. Agonism was rare during conspecific observation, what means that social tolerance was high. There were events in which immature monkeys alternated play and nutcracking behavior. An important part of nutcracking acquisition can be attributed to individual experiences, but there are also opportunities for social learning through direct observation of proficient conspecific, once observers are well tolerated.

A quebra de frutos encapsulados por macacos-prego com o auxílio de ferramentas é tipicamente objeto de observação e scrounging por coespecíficos, bastante tolerados e em geral mais jovens e menos proficientes. O presente estudo teve como objetivo examinar o processo de escolha, pelos observadores, dos alvos de observação, e se esta escolha pode otimizar as oportunidades de scrounging. A pesquisa foi realizada com um grupo de macacos-prego selvagens (Cebus libidinosus) na Fazenda Boa Vista (Piauí - Brasil), numa área de ecótono cerrado/caatinga. A partilha de alimento fora dos episódios de quebra de cocos e o uso de ferramentas para a quebra de outros itens alimentares encapsulados também foram abordados. Indivíduos de todas as classes de idade e sexo se envolveram na observação da quebra de cocos, havendo uma grande variação individual. Nossas análises mostram que os macacos preferencialmente escolhidos como alvos de observação foram aqueles que apresentaram maior Freqüência, Proficiência e Produtividade na quebra de cocos. Apesar de haver interações agonísticas durante os eventos de observação, os alvos se mostram muito tolerantes à observação e ao scrounging - 25% dos episódios de quebra são observados e mais da metade destes eventos de observação resultam em scrounging. Os observadores tiveram a oportunidade de comer os restos dos cocos e de manipular os itens do sítio de quebra. Estas observações reforçam a noção de que as condições e possibilidades vivenciadas pelo observador-scrounger otimizam as oportunidades para que ocorram processos de aprendizagem socialmente mediada, ao menos por realce de estímulo. Tal exposição próxima ao comportamento do alvo poderia influenciar aspectos mais finos do comportamento dos observadores, ao longo de sua história de aprendizagem. O presente estudo aborda estas interações entre manipuladores de ferramentas e observadores/scroungers pela primeira vez em uma população selvagem e discute as semelhanças e discrepâncias em relação aos resultados anteriormente obtidos com uma população em semil-liberdade. / The tool-aided cracking of encapsulated fruit by capuchin monkeys is a frequent target of observation and scrounging by conspecifics, well-tolerated and usually younger and less proficient. The present study aimed to examine the process of observational targets choice by the observers, and whether this choice can optimize scrounging opportunities. The research was conducted with a group of wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) in Fazenda Boa Vista (Piauí, Brazil), in an ecotone area between cerrado and caatinga savanna-like environments. Food sharing in contexts other than nut cracking, as well as the use of tools to crack open other food items were also analyzed. Individuals from all age and sex classes were involved in nut cracking observation. Our analyses show that the monkeys preferentially chosen as observational targets were the ones exhibiting the greater Frequency, Proficiency, and Productivity in nut cracking. In spite of a few agonistic interactions during observation events, the targets tend to be very tolerant to observation and to scrounging (25% of the nut cracking events are observed, and more than half of these resulted in scrounging). The observers had the opportunity of eating nuts leftovers and of manipulating items from the cracking sites, both in the presence and in the absence of the targets. These findings strengthen the idea that the conditions and possibilities experienced by the observers-scroungers optimize the opportunities for socially biased learning processes, at least by stimulus enhancement. Such close exposure to the targets behavior could also influence finer details of the observers behavior in the long run. The present study is the first one to deal with these interactions between tool manipulators and observers/scroungers in a wild population and discusses the similarities and differences from previous observations from a semi-free population.

Este trabalho teve como objetivo estudar o desenvolvimento do comportamento manipulativo em macacos-prego (Cebus apella) em semiliberdade, com ênfase na ontogênese do comportamento de quebra de cocos. A coleta de dados foi realizada ao longo de dois anos e meio, o que permitiu um acompanhamento longitudinal dos filhotes com idade inferior a dois anos. As dinâmicas sociais relacionadas à aprendizagem de quebra também foram estudadas. Os resultados mostram que os macacos começaram a manipular objetos com cerca de um mês de idade e conseguiram quebrar cocos com sucesso a partir dos dois anos. Eles observaram seus co-específicos quebrando cocos, sendo que os maiores observadores foram os imaturos, especialmente os juvenis. Os alvos de observação foram preferencialmente aqueles macacos que apresentaram uma maior taxa de quebra. Durante a observação de co-específicos, houve raros registros de agonismo, ou seja, há grande tolerância social. Houve intercalação entre brincadeira e quebra de cocos por macacos imaturos. Grande parte da aquisição do comportamento de quebra de cocos pode ser atribuída às experiências individuais, mas também há oportunidades para que ocorra a aprendizagem social por meio de observação direta do co-específico proficiente, já que os observadores são bem tolerados. / The objective of this work was to study the manipulative behavior of semifree-ranging tufted-capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), focusing on the ontogenesis of nutcracking behavior. Data collection was done during a period of two years and a half, and so, a longitudinal study with monkeys under two-years old could be performed. Social dynamics related to nutcracking learning were also studied. The results show that the monkeys started manipulating objects when they were around a month of age, but only subjects over two years of age were able to sucessfully crack nuts. They observed conspecific nutcracking: immature monkeys were the main observers, especially juveniles. The main targets of observation were the monkeys who had the highest nutcracking rate. Agonism was rare during conspecific observation, what means that social tolerance was high. There were events in which immature monkeys alternated play and nutcracking behavior. An important part of nutcracking acquisition can be attributed to individual experiences, but there are also opportunities for social learning through direct observation of proficient conspecific, once observers are well tolerated.

A separação histórica entre as ciências naturais e as ciências sociais fundamenta-se na distinção ontológica entre os domínios da natureza e da cultura, e na ideia moderna de que a condição (cultural) humana corresponde a um afastamento radical dos outros animais. Porém, somando-se a outros críticos insatisfeitos com essa visão dualista, muitos estudiosos do comportamento animal tem utilizado o termo cultura em referência a não humanos, provocando uma controvérsia que ainda parece longe de um consenso. Neste trabalho, investiguei o sentido da noção de cultura para os antropólogos e o uso etológico (limitando-nos aos primatas) do termo, com os objetivos de compreender melhor a controvérsia e identificar caminhos possíveis na busca por um consenso. Na Antropologia, a noção moderna de cultura se desenvolveu do século XIX até os anos 1950. Cultura passou a ser vista como um fenômeno emergente exclusivamente humano, dependente de nossa capacidade de utilizar símbolos e correspondendo aos padrões e normas comportamentais, artefatos, ideias e, principalmente, valores que os indivíduos adquirem no processo de socialização. Mais recentemente, essa concepção de cultura, e a epistemologia dualista que a sustenta, tem sido alvo de críticas e intenso debate. Ainda que não compartilhem um arcabouço teórico comum, virtualmente todos os antropólogos contemporâneos concordam que o comportamento cultural humano é fundamentalmente simbólico. A discussão recente em torno da atribuição de cultura a primatas não humanos remonta aos estudiosos japoneses que, na década de 1950, acompanharam a dispersão de uma nova técnica de manipulação de alimento em Macaca fuscata, e descreveram o fenômeno com os termos pré-cultura, subcultura e cultura infra-humana. A partir da década de 1960, as pesquisas de campo com populações selvagens e as evidências experimentais de aprendizagem em contexto social levaram ao estabelecimento da Primatologia Cultural e os prefixos foram abandonados. Entre primatólogos, o termo cultura se refere a padrões comportamentais que dependem de um contexto social para se desenvolver, e que podem atravessar gerações. Eu sugiro uma estratégia analítica que distingue os motivos de discordância entre descrições, explicações, teorias e visões de mundo, e argumento que a controvérsia é complexa e inclui discordâncias entre visões de mundo sem, no entanto, dividir os envolvidos em grupos homogêneos (digamos, primatólogos contra antropólogos). Por conta disso, a redefinição e o uso que os primatólogos fazem do termo acabam por manter ilesos os fundamentos da dicotomia natureza/cultura, o que pode explicar, parcialmente, a manutenção da controvérsia. Concluo que o diálogo entre os dois lados da fronteira será imprescindível para os pesquisadores que estiverem interessados em buscar uma abordagem consensual. É possível alcançar um consenso, mas a busca por uma abordagem sintética do comportamento animal que inclua os humanos deverá levar ao abandono ou reconstrução das dualidades natureza/cultura, inato/adquirido e gene/ambiente, e também da atribuição de primazia causal aos genes. Além disso, é necessário discutir a fundo sobre como incluir a questão do simbolismo e do significado em uma perspectiva comparativa / The Western ontological distinction between nature and culture, and the idea that the human (cultural) condition makes us radically different from other animals, are evident in the historical separation between the natural and social sciences. In parallel to other critics of this dualist view, some animal behaviorists have been using the term culture in relation to nonhumans, starting a controversy that is still far from cooling down. In this study, I investigated the meaning of the term culture as used by anthropologists, and also its recent use by ethologists (limiting myself to primatology), in order to better understand the controversy and identify possible paths that might lead to a consensus. In Anthropology, the modern concept of culture developed between the 19th century and the 1950s. It came to be seen as an emergent phenomenon exclusive to human social life. It was dependent on our capacity to use symbols and corresponded to behavioral patterns and norms, artifacts, ideas, and values that individuals acquire in the process of socialization. But this conception of culture, and the dualist epistemology supporting it, have since been largely criticized and intensely debated. Although contemporary anthropologists do not share a common ground or framework, virtually all of them agree that human cultural behavior is fundamentally symbolic. Recent attribution of culture to nonhuman primates started with Japanese scholars who, from the 1950s onward, have followed closely the spread of novel behaviors in Macaca fuscata, which they described with expressions such as preculture, subculture and infrahuman culture. Since the 1960s, field studies on wild populations and experimental research on learning in a social context, have led to the establishment of Cultural Primatology, and the prefixes were abandoned. Among primatologists, the term culture refers to behavioral patterns that depend on the social context to develop and that might be recurrent through generations. I suggest that it might be analytically useful to distinguish the matters of a disagreement between descriptions, explanations, theories and worldviews, and argue that this controversy goes all the way up to the highest reason of disagreement (worldviews). Still, one cannot divide those involved in it into a few homogeneous groups (say, primatologists contra anthropologists). Primatologists redefinition and use of the term do not alter the foundations of the criticized nature/culture dichotomy, and that might at least partially explain the maintenance of the controversy. It is possible to reach a consensus, but the search for a synthetic framework for animal behavior that includes humans might lead to the abandonment or reconstruction of the related dichotomies of nature/culture, innate/acquired and gene/environment, as well as of the causal primacy attributed to genes. It is also necessary to discuss how to include symbols and meanings in a comparative perspective

A ordem primata apresenta uma grande diversidade de modos de organização social, desde espécies consideradas solitárias até aquelas em que os indivíduos de um grupo permanecem o tempo todo juntos. Macacos-prego (Cebus spp.) geralmente vivem em grupos estáveis e coesos, sem a formação de subgrupos. No entanto, sua organização social pode ser mais flexível. Dois estudos anteriores, conduzidos com populações de Cebus nigritus da Mata Atlântica, indicaram a divisão de grupos em subgrupos, mas não concluíram se os processos que foram observados eram de divisão permanente de um grupo grande ou se essas populações assumiam a organização social do tipo de fissão-fusão. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar se os grupos de macacos-prego do Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho (PECB) caracterizam-se como sociedades do tipo fissão-fusão ou se a formação de subgrupos ocorre apenas como um estágio temporário pré-divisão permanente. No período de Janeiro de 2003 a Março de 2006, foram acompanhados dois grupos sociais, com os indivíduos adultos reconhecidos. Dados de outros grupos foram coletados de forma oportunística. Para verificar se o grupo estava forrageando de forma coesa ou dividido em subgrupos, era feito um censo dos membros do grupo a cada hora e, para o registro da composição dos subgrupos foi contado o número de machos adultos, de fêmeas adultas e de juvenis. Para avaliar a disponibilidade de alimento foram distribuídas 153 armadilhas \"pitfall\" ao longo da área de uso dos animais. Os dados sobre comportamento (locomoção, descanso, forrageamento e locomoção mais forrageamento) e dieta (frutos, invertebrados e folhas) foram registrados por amostragem de varredura, a cada 5 minutos. Também foram anotados o tempo de depleção das fontes de frutos (FTFS) e o número de indivíduos que se alimentaram juntos na mesma árvore (tamanho da subunidade de alimentação). Todos os grupos de macacos-prego observados no PECB organizaram-se em sociedades de fissão-fusão, dividindo-se constantemente em subgrupos de tamanho e composição variável, com associações preferenciais entre pares de macho e fêmea, composição multi-macho/multi-fêmea e ausência de dominância entre as fêmeas. Todas essas características observadas se assemelham com as características de chimpanzés e de primatas neotropicais que se organizam em fissão-fusão. A principal diferença entre os macacos-prego e essas espécies é a dispersão sexual do grupo natal. Em macacos-prego os machos migram entre grupos, enquanto em sociedades de fissão-fusão os machos são filopátricos. Em relação aos dados ecológicos, o FTFS e o tamanho das subunidades de alimentação tiveram valores baixos para todos os grupos de macacos-prego, indicando que as fontes de frutos não sustentam todo o grupo por ter recursos de pobre qualidade. Houve uma relação entre tamanho de subgrupo e padrão da oferta de alimento: quanto maiores e mais uniformemente distribuídas as fontes de frutos no habitat das quais os animais estavam se alimentando, maior o subgrupo. Portanto, os macacos-prego do PECB ajustam o tamanho de grupo para reagir às variações ecológicas, em função de baixa disponibilidade de frutos e assim, essa grande flexibilidade permite que eles se adaptem a novos ambientes e se comportem de modo a aumentar sua aptidão. / The primate order presents a great diversity of social organization, from species considered solitary to those where the individuals of a group remain together all the time. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.) generally live in stable and cohesive groups, without the formation of subgroups. However, their social organization can be more flexible. Two former studies on two populations of Cebus nigritus from the Atlantic Forest suggested the occurrence of subgrouping, but the authors could not conclude whether the observed processes were due to a permanent division of a large group or whether these populations were actually fission-fusion societies. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the capuchin monkey groups of the State Park Carlos Botelho (PECB) can be characterized as a fission-fusion society or subgrouping is a temporary strategy prior to a permanent division of a large group. From January 2003 to March 2006, two social groups were followed, with the adult individuals recognized. Data from other groups were collected in an opportunistic way. To verify whether the group was foraging in a cohesive way or divided in subgroups, a census of the group members was performed at each hour and, and the number of adult males, adult females and juveniles were counted to analyze the composition of the subgroups. In order to evaluate the food availability 153 pitfall traps were distributed along the long home range. Data about behavior (locomotion, rest, foraging and locomotion more foraging) and diet (fruits, invertebrates and leaves) were registered by scan sampling every 5 minutes. The depletion time of fruit sources (FTFS) and the number of individuals that fed together in the same tree (size of feeding subunity) were recorded. All the capuchin monkey groups observed in the PECB were organized as a fission-fusion society, splitting into subgroups of variable size and composition, with preferential associations between pairs of male and female, composition multi-male/multi-female and absence of dominance among females. All these observed characteristics are similar to chimpanzees and neotropical primates which present fission-fusion. The main difference among capuchin monkeys and these species are the sexual dispersion from natal group. In capuchin monkeys the males migrate among groups, while in fission-fusion societies the males are philopatric. In relation to the ecological data, the FTFS and the feeding subunity size had low values for all the capuchin monkey groups, indicating that the fruit sources at PECB are poor quality resources and do not support all group members. There was a relation between subgroup size and pattern of food availability: the largerer and more uniformly distributed the fruit sources the animals were feeding, the larger the subgroup. Therefore, capuchin monkeys at PECB adjust their group size in response to the ecological variations, due to the low fruit availability and thus, this great flexibility allows them to adapt to a new environment and to behave in order to increase their fitness.

L’impulsivité décisionnelle est une des multiples dimensions de l’impulsivité. Elle est définie comme la préférence d’une petite récompense immédiate à une grande récompense différée, et dérive du fait que la valeur que l’on attribue à une récompense diminue avec le temps. Quand la dévaluation temporelle est excessive, l’impulsivité de choix devient un symptôme présent dans de nombreuses pathologies. Le striatum, structure cérébrale profonde composée de trois sous-territoires, le noyau caudé, le striatum ventral et le putamen, est un élément clé dans le traitement de l’impulsivité décisionnelle. En effet, il constitue la principale cible de la dopamine, connue pour être un modulateur de l’impulsivité. En lien avec le cortex, le striatum antérieur est impliqué dans les processus de prise de décision, de motivation liée à la récompense, et de sélection de l’action. Nous avons étudié le rôle spécifique des territoires du striatum dans l’impulsivité de choix chez le singe réalisant une tâche de dévaluation temporelle. En utilisant une approche comportementale et d’imagerie, nous avons montré que le noyau caudé était impliqué dans l’impulsivité de choix induite par le Pramipexole, un agoniste dopaminergique des récepteurs D2/3. Dans une seconde étude, nous avons montré que le Méthylphénidate, un inhibiteur de recapture de la dopamine utilisé comme traitement du trouble du déficit attentionnel/hyperactivité, diminuait l’impulsivité décisionnelle en passant par une action sur le striatum ventral. En résumé, ces résultats confirment le rôle de la dopamine dans l’impulsivité décisionnelle et montrent les rôles spécifiques du noyau caudé et du striatum ventral dans les processus décisionnels liés à la dévaluation temporelle / Temporal discounting is the process by which future rewards are subjectively devalued by the decision maker. Impulsive choices, defined as the tendency to prefer small immediate rewards over larger but delayed ones, derive from a high temporal discounting. This particular dimension of impulsivity is a trait of personality, but also a symptom in many neuropsychiatric disorders. It has been shown many times that impulsive choices can be modulated by dopaminergic agents. The dopamine targets the striatum, a cerebral structure linked to cortex, subdivided into three territories – the Ventral Striatum (VS), the Caudate Nucleus (CdN) and the Putamen - and involved in motivation, goal directed behaviors, decision making and action selection. All these functions are involved in impulsive behaviors, although the specific role of each territory in impulsivity remains unknown. Here, using pharmacologic and imaging approaches, we aimed to study the role of the anterior striatum in impulsive choices using the delay discounting task in non-human primates. First, we showed that the CdN supports impulsive choices triggered by Pramipexole, a D2/3 agonist suspected to produce impulsive control disorders. In a second study, we used Methylphenidate, a blocker of dopamine transporter used in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and we demonstrated that the VS supports Methylphenidate therapeutic effects on impulsive choices expressed in temporal discounting task. Together, our results show that dopaminergic modulation plays a specific role on the CdN and the VS in the processes of impulsive choices, and suggest a dual action between ventral and dorsal striatal territories

Cette Thèse d'Etat, soutenue en 1977, a permis de mettre en perspective les recherches de terrain réalisées dans les régions forestières d'Afrique, d'Amérique et d'Asie. La plupart des données et des discussions présentées dans ce mémoire ont fait l'objet de publications (généralement en anglais) cependant des données originales (dont une partie non publiée) figurent dans les Annexes, notamment en ce qui concerne le composition des aliments consommés par les primates dans leur environnement naturel, ainsi que les données de base sur la morphologie intestinale des différents primates comparés à d'autres mammifères.

For humans and non-human primates (NHPs) the face represents a particularly important source of social information providing a means of conspecific recognition and cues to personal details including sex, age, and emotional state. The human face may also be fundamental in the transmission to conspecifics of other forms of socially relevant information including the display of facial traits associated with sexual attraction and mate choice. A wealth of experimental literature indicates that humans display robust preferences for certain facial traits associated with facial attractiveness including preferences for bilateral facial symmetry, facial averageness and sexually dimorphic faces and facial features. It is thought that these preferences have evolved via sexual selection, and may be adaptive, due to the role that these specific facial features play in reliably signalling to others the possession of heritable genetic quality or ‘good genes’. Therefore, from an evolutionary perspective, it is possible that certain facial preferences may represent an evolutionary adaptation for the selection of potential mate quality. However, despite similarities between human and NHP face processing and recognition abilities, the shared evolutionary history and social importance of faces to primates in general, and the potential importance of these preferences in the mate choice decisions of NHPs, very little research has investigated the extent to which NHPs display comparable preferences to humans for these specific facial traits. Consequently, the aim of the following thesis was to comparatively assess the general and more specific preferences that humans and NHPs display for faces and for traits associated with facial attractiveness. Data was compiled from preference studies examining the visual preferences displayed by two species of NHP (brown capuchins (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)) for conspecific faces manipulated for those facial traits associated with attractiveness, and from a single study of brown capuchins examining their general visual preferences for various types of facial information. Comparative preference studies were also conducted upon human adults and infants examining the visual and declared preferences that they display for manipulations of facial attractiveness. Data showed that despite possessing general preferences for certain faces and facial information, generally NHPs displayed no significant preferences for those facial traits thought to influences judgements of attractiveness in humans. Possible reasons for this absence of preference for these particular facial traits and the evolutionary implications of these findings are discussed.