Då den svenska offentliga sektorn handlar kontorsmaterial, idrottsarenor, tjänster eller andra former av inköp hamnar detta under benämningen offentlig upphandling. Den totala summan av offentlig upphandling i Sverige uppskattas överstiga 500 miljarder svenska kronor årligen. När en offentlig upphandling skall genomföras skapas ett förfrågningsmaterial från upphandlaren genom vilket leverantörer får lämna anbud om att kunna slutföra det kontrakt som erbjuds. När anbuden kommer in är det upphandlarens uppgifter att avgöra vilket anbud som är det mest fördelaktiga, detta genom att väga olika faktorer emot varandra. Denna studie undersöker ifall faktorn pris prioriteras i denna beslutsfattande situation från upphandlaren. Resultaten visar på att pris först i slutändan är den faktor som avgör vilken leverantör som blir vinnare i budgivningen, men detta är först efter att andra faktorer redan har blivit beaktade och påverkat faktorn pris. / Program: Civilekonomprogrammet

A participação privada em infra-estrutura não é um conceito novo. Os serviços públicos têm sido prestados por terceiros e as concessões têm sido delegadas a investidores privados por séculos. Nas últimas décadas, contudo, a participação privada tem mudado a forma segundo a qual a infra-estrutura e os serviços públicos são providos ao redor do mundo. A última tendência nessa área tem sido a associação entre o governo e o setor privado, denominada parceria públicoprivada (PPP), para a provisão de serviços usualmente prestados pelo setor público. Nesses novos tipos de arranjos, a sustentabilidade financeira do projeto pode requerer algum tipo de contribuição do governo, que precisa, por conseguinte, prestar contas para a sociedade sobre a eficiência no uso dos recursos públicos. Nesse contexto, modelos de análise da qualidade do investimento público para avaliar a conveniência e a oportunidade da contratação em regime de PPP têm sido propostos por diversos governos, que, desta forma, prestam contas para a sociedade sobre as suas ações. Os primeiros modelos de análise, baseados unicamente em comparações financeiras, foram severamente criticados devido à subjetividade na avaliação dos riscos, ao viés para a escolha da opção com financiamento privado e à suposta manipulação dos resultados. Como resultado, os governo têm, nos últimos anos, introduzido inovações nesses modelos a fim de eliminar as deficiências detectadas e incorporar os avanços mais recentes na política e regulação das PPPs. Este trabalho tem como objetivo contribuir para a regulamentação do Art. 4° e do Art. 10° da Lei n° 11.079/2004, que condiciona a abertura da licitação à demonstração da conveniência e da oportunidade da contratação na forma de PPP. Além de estabelecer diretrizes para a análise financeira do projeto que reduzem os problemas detectados em outras abordagens, o modelo propõe uma combinação de análises socioeconômicas e testes do interesse público e privado que permitem avaliar o suporte público ao projeto e a capacidade de o setor privado conduzi-lo de forma eficiente. Entende-se que o modelo proposto promove a prestação de contas, a auditabilidade e a transparência nos projetos de PPP, condições fundamentais para a legitimidade dessa nova política no Brasil. O método de pesquisa adotado envolveu a revisão do estado da arte na implementação e análise de projetos de PPP, além da consulta a profissionais e gerentes envolvidos com o desenvolvimento de parcerias pioneiras no Reino Unido. / The private participation in infrastructure is not a new concept. Outsourcing and concession have been in place for centuries in many countries, where private companies played an important role in the development of the physical infrastructure. In the last decades, however, private participation has deeply changed the ways infrastructure and public services are delivered around the world. The most recent trend in this context is the partnership between the government and the private sector in areas of traditional public sector provision and control. Under this new approach, different types of government contributions may be required to render projects attractive to private investors. As a result, these schemes require a high level of public accountability, and the government must demonstrate that the PPP deal offers value for money for the use of public resources. Value for money assessment frameworks have been proposed in different countries to test whether the public-private partnership is the most efficient option for the government to carry out the project and deliver the associated services. Therefore, these frameworks are essential for the accountability and legitimacy of this new policy. The earliest value for money frameworks were severely criticized due to deficiencies such as subjectivity in risk analysis, bias for the selection of the private financing option and manipulation of the results to produce an expected answer. Recently, value for money frameworks have been reformed to address the deficiencies of the former approaches and to incorporate the ongoing evolution in public-private partnerships regulation and policy-making. This thesis aims to contribute for the regulation of the Brazilian PPP Law, which demands the demonstration of the value for money as a requisite for the progress of the project as a PPP. In this context, the thesis proposed not only comprehensive changes in the financial analysis approach for PPPs, but also the combination of socioeconomic, public interest and market appetite analysis prior to the procurement process as an indication of the likelihood of getting value for money in the deal. Consequently, the proposed framework highlights the accountability, transparency and auditability of schemes, which is ultimately a cornerstone for the legitimacy of the PPP policy. The research collection method involved a literature review of PPP state of art and meetings with public and private managers involved in groundbreaking PPP projects in the United Kingdom.

79 Abstract The method of entering into a contract in public tenders according to Act. No. 134/2016 Coll. is a civil contractual process with a high degree of formalization and legal regulation. This makes it different from the general contractual process in civil law. The first chapter of this thesis is devoted to the analysis of public tenders in terms of setting up the legal framework. It goes into a conclusion that contractual process in public tender is part of the civil law with the subsidiary use of civil law rules, especially the Civil Code. The second chapter deals with a contractual process in a public tender itself. The process is divided into two phases - a precontractual phase and contractual phase. The precontractual phase includes procedures of the public tender that determine the clarification of content of the contract and the range of contractors. The contractual phase contains mainly the actual entering into a contract with successful tenderer. The chapter describes the specificity of the contractual process in a public tender since the announcement of the tender up to the actual entering into a contract. These specificities are introduced in relation to the open procedure being used in upper-tier mode. At the end of the chapter, there is a comparison with other types of proceedings and...

Awarding a public contract pursuant to Act No 134/2016 Coll., on public procurement, is aimed at creating a specific obligatory relationship between a contracting authority and a selected contractor, essentially on the basis of a previous tender procedure, unless the law specifies otherwise in the given case. The tender procedure is a special arrangement for the pre-contracting and contracting process, which takes place in a binding, legally defined procedure differing from an ordinary private-law contract, even though it is also a private-law procedure according to the predominant doctrinal and case law opinion. The topic of this diploma thesis is an analysis of the specifics of the contract process leading to the conclusion of a public contract, in order to draw attention to its similarities and also to the differences when compared to general private-law contracting. The thesis is divided into three parts, the first of which, primarily deals with the Act No 134/2016 Coll., on public procurement, its classification in systemic law, its relation to the EU public procurement regulation, the nature of tender procedure (specifically open procedure) and the public contract. The key charter is then dedicated to the award of a public contract, followed by the last section on changes to already concluded...

The diploma thesis deals with issues related to the award of public contracts in the field of architecture and design. Due to the scope of the topic, the view is focused on the analysis of public procurement in the field. The diploma thesis describes the types of public contracts and tenders, applicable legislation, control authority in the Czech Republic and design and architectural work.

The diploma thesis deals with problems of calculation of price offers. The theoretical part provides a breakdown of costs and their determination, explains the division of public contracts by the expected values and the conditions of qualification of candidates. The practical part of this thesis explains the optimized procedures of price offer of the specific building company, in preparing the direct and indirect cost on an example of the public contract. In conclusion the price is compared to the real costs.

Thesis is focused on the issue of compiling an inventory of works, supplies and services of the construction, which is part of the tender documentation for public contracts. The work deals with the issue of prices, budgets and the tender documentation itself. It also lists the most common errors in compiling a list of works, supplies and services in accordance to Decree No. 169/2016 Coll. Individual errors are written and subsequently analyzed according to selected parameters. Based on this analysis, a methodology for checking inventories of works, supplies and services is compiled.

Thesis (LLD)--Stellenbosch University, 2013. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation considers the question whether there are viable alternatives to the conceptual framework within which the South African administrative-law system operates, given that the administration now functions under new constitutional demands and new approaches to administrative engagement. The intention is not to proffer concrete recommendations for such a system, but only to propose an approach by means of which questions concerning the legal regulation of the administration and administrative function may be addressed. The dissertation introduces the concept of the contextualised administrative-law system. This concept emphasises the legal relationship between the public administration and the judiciary, but is not limited to this relationship. The administrative-law system does not operate in a vacuum, though, and is informed by the conceptual framework within which the system operates. The system is also a function of its geo-political and socio-economic context. The historical development of the doctrine of separation of powers, as one aspect of the conceptual framework, is traced. Thereby the normative, dynamic and flexible nature of the doctrine is established. On this basis, the potential and value of a fourth branch, the administration, within the separation-of-powers doctrine is assessed. By implication, the administrative function would constitute a fourth, distinct function in addition to the legislative, executive and judicial functions. The concept of the administrative-law system is consequently applied to the South African context. Firstly, the development of the South African system is outlined and, secondly, the administrative-law relationship is analysed. This discussion establishes that the system is characterised by an embryonic administrative law, the equating of administrative law and judicial review, an emphasis on the rule-of-law or “red-light” approach to administrative regulation, a rhetoric of deference, and the supremacy of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Therefore, the system must be informed by the Constitution and, arguably, by Karl Klare’s project of transformative constitutionalism and Etienne Mureinik’s “culture of justification”. The content of the separation of powers is also investigated by means of an historical analysis of the considerations that rationalise the existence of an independent administrative jurisdiction in France. This entails an exposition of the Conseil d’État’s structure, organisation and dual function. Principles that describe the French system, other than the pure separation of powers, are discussed, namely, the duality of jurisdiction, the separation of administrative and judicial authorities, the separation of the administrative jurisdiction and active administration, the maxim “to judge the administration is still administering”, and the hybrid nature of administrative litigation. The legal regulation of public contracts can be regarded as a doctrinal perspective of the administrative-law system. The public contract is discussed as one form of administration, due to its conceptual ambiguity as a legal instrument on the boundary between public and private law and due to the administration’s increasing contractual activity. To an extent the contrat administratif of French law indicates that particular legal rules are an extension of the broader principles, considerations and institutional structures discussed in the preceding sections. This dissertation introduces an approach that emphasises the relationship between the administration and the judiciary as well as the conceptual framework within which the administrative-law system operates. Through the application of this approach to the South African context and to public contracting the key concepts and debates underlying an appropriate administrative-law system in South Africa are identified and investigated. This constitutes a platform for the development of a particular administrative-law system and an exposition of viable alternatives to the conceptual framework within which the system operates. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie proefskrif ondersoek die vraag of daar lewensvatbare alternatiewe tot die konseptuele raamwerk van die huidige Suid-Afrikaanse administratiefreg-stelsel moontlik is. Dié vraag word gestel teen die agtergrond van die nuwe grondwetlike vereistes en benaderings waaraan administratiewe interaksie moet voldoen. Die bedoeling is nie om aanbevelings vir die bestaande stelsel te maak nie, maar eerder om ‘n benadering voor te stel waarin vrae oor die regulering van die administrasie en die administratiewe funksie geakkommodeer kan word. In die proses skep die proefskrif ‘n nuwe konsep: die administratiefreg-stelsel in konteks, wat die regsverhouding tussen die administrasie en die regbank beklemtoon, terwyl dit nie beperk is tot die verhouding nie. Uiteraard word die administratiefregstelsel beïnvloed deur die konseptuele raamwerk waarin dit funksioneer, terwyl dit verder ook ‘n funksie is van sy geopolitiese en sosio-ekonomiese konteks. Die historiese ontwikkeling van die skeiding van magte, een aspek van die konseptuele raamwerk, word bespreek en daardeur word die normatiewe, dinamiese en buigsame aard van die leerstuk bevestig. Hiermee word die potensiaal en waarde van ‘n vierde been, naamlik die administrasie, binne die skeiding-van-magte leerstuk oorweeg, met die implikasie dat die administratiewe funksie ‘n onafhanklike, vierde funksie vestig, benewens die wetgewende, uitvoerende en regsprekende funksies. Die konsep van die administratiefreg-stelsel word gevolglik toegepas op die Suid- Afrikaanse konteks. Eerstens word die ontwikkeling van die Suid-Afrikaanse stelsel uiteengesit en dan tweedens word die administratiefreg-verhouding ontleed. Hierdie bespreking bevestig dat die stelsel gekenmerk word deur ‘n onderontwikkelde administratiefreg, die gelykstelling van die administratiefreg en geregtelike hersiening, die beklemtoning van die regstaat en ‘n sogenaamde rooilig-benadering tot administratiewe regulasie, ‘n retoriek van geregtike agting, en die oppergesag van die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika, 1996. Juis as gevolg hiervan moet die stelsel op die Grondwet gegrond word. Daar word ook geargumenteer dat Karl Klare se transformerende konstitusionalisme sowel as Etienne Mureinik se kultuur van regverdiging die stelsel vorm behoort te gee. Die skeiding van magte se inhoud word ook aan ‘n historiese ontleding van Franse reg onderwerp om sodoende die rasionaal agter die onafhanklike administratiewe jurisdiksie in Frankryk te verduidelik. Dit behels ‘n uiteensetting van die Conseil d’État se struktuur, interne organisering en tweeledige funksie. Die beginsels wat die Franse stelsel beskryf, bo-en-behalwe die suiwer skeiding van magte, word bespreek en dit is by name die dualiteit van jurisdiksie, die skeiding van administratiewe en regsprekende owerhede, die skeiding van die administratiewe jurisdiksie en aktiewe administrasie, die leuse wanneer die administrasie beoordeel word, word daar steeds administreer, en die gemengde aard van administratiewe regsgedinge. Die openbare kontrak word bespreek as ‘n instrument van administrasie gegewe die konseptuele dubbelsinnigheid van daardie regskonsep, wat op die grens tussen publiek- en privaatreg lê, en as gevolg van die administrasie se toenemende kontraktuele aktiwiteit. In ‘n mate dui die Franse contrat administratif daarop dat bepaalde regsreëls ‘n uitbreiding van die breër beginsels, oorwegings en institusionele strukture is, soos in die voorafgaande afdelings bespreek word. Dus stel hierdie proefskrif ‘n benadering voor wat die verhouding tussen die administrasie en die regbank, sowel as die konseptuele raamwerk waarbinne die administratiefreg-stelsel funksioneer, beklemtoon. Deur hierdie benadering toe te pas op die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks, en op openbare kontraktering, word die konsepte en debatte geïdentifiseer en ondersoek wat ‘n gepaste administratiefreg-stelsel onderskryf. Dit vorm ‘n basis vir die ontwikkeling van ‘n bepaalde administratiefregstelsel en die uiteensetting van lewensvatbare alternatiewe tot die konseptuele raamwerk waarbinne die stelsel funksioneer.

The small-scale public contracts and their legal regulations in the Czech republic The goal of this thesis is to make a brief characteristics of a legal insitut of the small- scale public contracts and its legal regulations in the Czech republic with regard to international law and law of the European Union. The tesis in their openning chapters approaches and explains a term and importance of the small-scale public contracts as applicable law recognizes them recently, whereas does not omit an importance of historical consequences of recent law with rules of the times of the Austria-Hungary. Then this thesis deals with the rules of public procurement in the form of the small-scale public contracts according to the legislation which was contained in a code No. 199/1994 C.l., of commission of public contracts and in a code No. 40/2004 C.l., of public contracts. The thesis analyses modern internal legislation - a code No. 137/2006 C.l., of public contracts and gives a focus on the changes which should be brought by the approval of the last amandement of this act by the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech republic and emphasises an effect of these changes on the small-scale public contracts. International law`s principles dominating to public procurement including the small-scale public contracts are...

<p>Поглед на јавно-приватно партнерство (у даљем тексту: ЈПП) у савременим условима даје&nbsp;слику о комплексном модерном концепту, економско-правној, али и политичкој&nbsp;категорији, институту који је на први поглед сасвим јасан, а суштински недовољно&nbsp;истражен. ЈПП посматрано под лупом научне и стручне јавности, углавном се описује као&nbsp;пожељан концепт у домену развоја инфраструктуре и пружања јавних услуга. Схватање да&nbsp;се путем ЈПП могу решити сви проблеми који не могу бити ефикасно решени од стране јавног сектора је готово митско. Оно никада неће бити доминантан модел у овој области,&nbsp;због своје комплексности, због чињенице да је за мале пројекте скуп метод, али и због&nbsp;тога што некада захтева коришћење много више ресурса него што је потребно.&nbsp;Успостављањем овог вида сарадње између јавног и приватног партнера може да се сложи<br />финансијска слагалица и реши проблем финансирања одређеног пројекта, поделом&nbsp;трошкова и одговорности јавног и приватног субјекта. Ипак ЈПП не треба приступати&nbsp;само као механизму помоћу ког ће се исправити недостаци на тржишту. Треба имати у&nbsp;виду појединачне предности овог модела и вредности које му се приписују.<br />Први део рада посвећен је истраживачком путу ка проналажењу адекватне дефиниције&nbsp;ЈПП, уз свевремено настојање да се овај концепт разликује од сличних модела. Указано је&nbsp;на основне предности и недостатке ЈПП, представљен историјски развој сарадње јавног и&nbsp;приватног партнера и анализирана су начела ЈПП.<br />Други део рада посвећен је правном оквиру ЈПП. Анализиране су правне норме којима је&nbsp;регулисано ЈПП, прво у Европској унији, а потом и у Републици Србији. Услов за&nbsp;примену ЈПП у свакој држави је доношење одговарајућих правних норми и обезбеђивање&nbsp;начина и средстава за примену ових норми. Када се у улози института који је потребно&nbsp;правно уредити јави хибридна творевина попут ЈПП, намеће се захтев за успостављањем&nbsp;баланса између приватног и јавног права и остваривањем разних циљева, попут&nbsp;економских, социјалних и правних, што комплексној мрежи јавно-приватних односа даје&nbsp;специфичност и универзалну вредност. Због значаја усклађивања националног&nbsp;законодавства са правом Европске уније, истраживачки рад усмерен је на утврђивање&nbsp;резултата досадашње хармонизације правила о ЈПП у домаћем праву са онима која важе у<br />праву Европске уније, у циљу давања закључка о томе у којој мери је овај посао успешно&nbsp;спроведен. У овом делу рада учињен је и кратак осврт на регулаторну делатност&nbsp;UNCITRAL-а и могућност стандардизације јавних уговора.<br />Трећи део рада посвећен је облицима ЈПП, при чему су детаљно анализирани уговорни&nbsp;облици ЈПП, а потом је указано на најзначајније карактеристике институционалног ЈПП.<br />Четврти део посвећен је субјектима ЈПП. Након детаљне анализе правног положаја јавног&nbsp;и приватног партнера, наметнуло се као питање од нарочитог значаја за обраду теме да се&nbsp;утврди које чињенице су утицале на то да локалне самоуправе постану субјект који се&nbsp;најчешће јавља у улози јавног партнера у пројектима ЈПП у Републици Србији, што&nbsp;представља изузетак у пракси која је забележена у Европској унији. У том циљу спроведено је емпиријско истраживање, а резултати истраживања унети су у овај део рада.<br />Због чињенице да се ЈПП смешта у режим јавних набавки када је потребно изабрати&nbsp;приватног партнера, односно доделити концесију, пети део овог рада односи се на право&nbsp;јавних набавки, а посебно се у овом делу рада говори о поступцима јавних набавки,&nbsp;критеријумима за избор приватног партнера, значају самоиницијативног предлога,&nbsp;правилима о заштити конкуренције, а због најуже повезаности са темом поступка доделе&nbsp;јавног уговора, у овом делу указано је на то какву улогу имају надлежне институције у&nbsp;поступку доделе јавног уговора и како се спроводи надзор над реализацијом јавног&nbsp;уговора.<br />Највећи део рада посвећен је јавном уговору о ЈПП, његовом појму, правној природи,&nbsp;садржини, изменама и престанку. Иако се у Републици Србији сматра да успех ЈПП&nbsp;зависи од добро сачињеног јавног уговора, у Европској унији влада став да је кључ успеха&nbsp;у природи односа између учесника, који треба да буде заснован на сарадњи и међусобном&nbsp;поверењу.<br />Уколико поверење изостане и дође до спора, уговорне стране користе неки од механизама&nbsp;за решавање насталог спора, који су анализирани у седмом делу рада. Осми део рада посвећен је закључним разматрањима и попису коришћене литературе.</p> / <p>Pogled na javno-privatno partnerstvo (u daljem tekstu: JPP) u savremenim uslovima daje&nbsp;sliku o kompleksnom modernom konceptu, ekonomsko-pravnoj, ali i političkoj&nbsp;kategoriji, institutu koji je na prvi pogled sasvim jasan, a suštinski nedovoljno&nbsp;istražen. JPP posmatrano pod lupom naučne i stručne javnosti, uglavnom se opisuje kao&nbsp;poželjan koncept u domenu razvoja infrastrukture i pružanja javnih usluga. Shvatanje da&nbsp;se putem JPP mogu rešiti svi problemi koji ne mogu biti efikasno rešeni od strane javnog sektora je gotovo mitsko. Ono nikada neće biti dominantan model u ovoj oblasti,&nbsp;zbog svoje kompleksnosti, zbog činjenice da je za male projekte skup metod, ali i zbog&nbsp;toga što nekada zahteva korišćenje mnogo više resursa nego što je potrebno.&nbsp;Uspostavljanjem ovog vida saradnje između javnog i privatnog partnera može da se složi<br />finansijska slagalica i reši problem finansiranja određenog projekta, podelom&nbsp;troškova i odgovornosti javnog i privatnog subjekta. Ipak JPP ne treba pristupati&nbsp;samo kao mehanizmu pomoću kog će se ispraviti nedostaci na tržištu. Treba imati u&nbsp;vidu pojedinačne prednosti ovog modela i vrednosti koje mu se pripisuju.<br />Prvi deo rada posvećen je istraživačkom putu ka pronalaženju adekvatne definicije&nbsp;JPP, uz svevremeno nastojanje da se ovaj koncept razlikuje od sličnih modela. Ukazano je&nbsp;na osnovne prednosti i nedostatke JPP, predstavljen istorijski razvoj saradnje javnog i&nbsp;privatnog partnera i analizirana su načela JPP.<br />Drugi deo rada posvećen je pravnom okviru JPP. Analizirane su pravne norme kojima je&nbsp;regulisano JPP, prvo u Evropskoj uniji, a potom i u Republici Srbiji. Uslov za&nbsp;primenu JPP u svakoj državi je donošenje odgovarajućih pravnih normi i obezbeđivanje&nbsp;načina i sredstava za primenu ovih normi. Kada se u ulozi instituta koji je potrebno&nbsp;pravno urediti javi hibridna tvorevina poput JPP, nameće se zahtev za uspostavljanjem&nbsp;balansa između privatnog i javnog prava i ostvarivanjem raznih ciljeva, poput&nbsp;ekonomskih, socijalnih i pravnih, što kompleksnoj mreži javno-privatnih odnosa daje&nbsp;specifičnost i univerzalnu vrednost. Zbog značaja usklađivanja nacionalnog&nbsp;zakonodavstva sa pravom Evropske unije, istraživački rad usmeren je na utvrđivanje&nbsp;rezultata dosadašnje harmonizacije pravila o JPP u domaćem pravu sa onima koja važe u<br />pravu Evropske unije, u cilju davanja zaključka o tome u kojoj meri je ovaj posao uspešno&nbsp;sproveden. U ovom delu rada učinjen je i kratak osvrt na regulatornu delatnost&nbsp;UNCITRAL-a i mogućnost standardizacije javnih ugovora.<br />Treći deo rada posvećen je oblicima JPP, pri čemu su detaljno analizirani ugovorni&nbsp;oblici JPP, a potom je ukazano na najznačajnije karakteristike institucionalnog JPP.<br />Četvrti deo posvećen je subjektima JPP. Nakon detaljne analize pravnog položaja javnog&nbsp;i privatnog partnera, nametnulo se kao pitanje od naročitog značaja za obradu teme da se&nbsp;utvrdi koje činjenice su uticale na to da lokalne samouprave postanu subjekt koji se&nbsp;najčešće javlja u ulozi javnog partnera u projektima JPP u Republici Srbiji, što&nbsp;predstavlja izuzetak u praksi koja je zabeležena u Evropskoj uniji. U tom cilju sprovedeno je empirijsko istraživanje, a rezultati istraživanja uneti su u ovaj deo rada.<br />Zbog činjenice da se JPP smešta u režim javnih nabavki kada je potrebno izabrati&nbsp;privatnog partnera, odnosno dodeliti koncesiju, peti deo ovog rada odnosi se na pravo&nbsp;javnih nabavki, a posebno se u ovom delu rada govori o postupcima javnih nabavki,&nbsp;kriterijumima za izbor privatnog partnera, značaju samoinicijativnog predloga,&nbsp;pravilima o zaštiti konkurencije, a zbog najuže povezanosti sa temom postupka dodele&nbsp;javnog ugovora, u ovom delu ukazano je na to kakvu ulogu imaju nadležne institucije u&nbsp;postupku dodele javnog ugovora i kako se sprovodi nadzor nad realizacijom javnog&nbsp;ugovora.<br />Najveći deo rada posvećen je javnom ugovoru o JPP, njegovom pojmu, pravnoj prirodi,&nbsp;sadržini, izmenama i prestanku. Iako se u Republici Srbiji smatra da uspeh JPP&nbsp;zavisi od dobro sačinjenog javnog ugovora, u Evropskoj uniji vlada stav da je ključ uspeha&nbsp;u prirodi odnosa između učesnika, koji treba da bude zasnovan na saradnji i međusobnom&nbsp;poverenju.<br />Ukoliko poverenje izostane i dođe do spora, ugovorne strane koriste neki od mehanizama&nbsp;za rešavanje nastalog spora, koji su analizirani u sedmom delu rada. Osmi deo rada posvećen je zaključnim razmatranjima i popisu korišćene literature.</p> / <p>The view of public-private partnership (hereinafter: PPP) in contemporary conditions gives an&nbsp;image of a complex modern concept, in an economic-legal, but also a political category. This is&nbsp;an institution that is quite clear at first glance, but essentially inadequately explored. The PPP,&nbsp;viewed by the scientific and professional public, is generally described as a desirable concept in&nbsp;the field of infrastructure development and public service provision. The viewpoint according to which all problems the public sector may fail to solve can be solved through PPP is almost&nbsp;mythical. It will never be a dominant model in this area due to its complexity and the fact that it&nbsp;is expensive for small projects, but also because it sometimes requires the use of much more<br />resources than necessary. By establishing this type of cooperation between the public and private&nbsp;partners, a financial jigsaw puzzle can be made and the problem of financing of a particular&nbsp;project may be solved by the division of costs and responsibilities of the public and private&nbsp;entities. However, PPP should not be regarded only as a mechanism by which the shortcomings&nbsp;in the market will be amended. One should bear in mind the individual advantages of this model&nbsp;and the values attributed to it.<br />The first part of the paper deals with finding an appropriate definition of PPP, while<br />simultaneously trying to distinguish this concept from similar models. This part points out the&nbsp;basic advantages and disadvantages of PPP, presents the historical development of public and&nbsp;private partner cooperation and analyzes the principles of PPP.<br />In the second part of the paper, which is devoted to the legal framework of PPP, there is an&nbsp;analysis of the legal norms regulating the PPP, first in the European Union, and then in the&nbsp;Republic of Serbia. The requirement for the implementation of PPPs in each country is the&nbsp;adoption of appropriate legal norms and the provision of means for the application of these&nbsp;standards. When the role of the institute that needs to be regulated is taken by a hybrid formation&nbsp;such as PPP, then this leads to the demand for establishing a balance between private and public&nbsp;law and achieving various goals, such as economic, social and legal ones, which gives a specific&nbsp;and universal value to the complex network of public-private relations. Due to the importance of&nbsp;aligning the national legislation with the law of the European Union, the research focused on<br />determining the results of the previous harmonization of the rules on PPP in domestic law with&nbsp;the law of the European Union, in order to give a conclusion on the extent to which this work has&nbsp;been successfully implemented. In this part of the paper, there is a short overview of the&nbsp;regulatory activity of UNCITRAL and the possibility of standardizing public contracts.<br />In the third part of the paper, which is the result of the research on the forms of PPP, there is a&nbsp;detailed analysis of the contractual forms of PPP and the most significant characteristics of the&nbsp;institutional PPP.<br />The fourth part of the paper is dedicated to PPP subjects. After a detailed analysis of the legal&nbsp;position of the public and private partners, a question of particular importance for the topic arose&nbsp;and it refers to the necessity to find out which facts influenced the local self-government to&nbsp;become the subject that most often appears as a public partner in PPP projects in the Republic of&nbsp;Serbia, which is an exception in practice seen in the European Union. Hence, the empirical&nbsp;research was conducted and the results of the research are given in this part of the paper.<br />Owing to the fact that PPP is placed in the system of public procurement when it is necessary to&nbsp;choose a private partner, i.e. to grant a concession, the fifth part of this paper deals with the law&nbsp;on public procurement, in particular public procurement procedures, selection criteria for the&nbsp;private partner, the importance of a self-initiative proposal and regulations on protection of&nbsp;competition. Due to the closest connection with the topic of awarding the public contract, in this&nbsp;part there was an emphasis on the role of the competent institutions in the procedure of awarding&nbsp;a public contract and how the supervision over the implementation of the public contract is&nbsp;carried out.<br />The largest part of the paper is devoted to the public contract on PPP, its concept, legal nature,&nbsp;content, changes and termination. Although in the Republic of Serbia it is considered that the&nbsp;success of PPP depends on a well-made public contract, the European Union believes that the&nbsp;key to success lies in the nature of the relationship between the participants, which should be&nbsp;based on cooperation and mutual trust.<br />If the confidence fails and the dispute arises, the contracting parties may use one of the<br />mechanisms for resolving the dispute, which are analyzed in the seventh part of the paper. The eighth part of the paper is devoted to the concluding reviews and the list of references.</p>