Spelling suggestions: "subject:"rifle"" "subject:"kifle""
41 |
Avaliação da segurança de polimixina B em altas doses para o tratamento de infecções causadas por bacilos gram-negativo multirresistentesFrança, Josiane January 2017 (has links)
Base teórica: O surgimento de bactérias multirresistentes levou a uma renovação no interesse de antigos antimicrobianos, como a polimixina B, medicamento que foi descartado no passado devido sua toxicidade. Nas últimas duas décadas, esse antimicrobiano tornou-se um dos mais importantes agentes terapêuticos para o tratamento de infecções causadas por bactérias multirresistentes; porém, ainda faltam estudos clínicos que avaliem a segurança da polimixina B, especialmente em altas doses. Objetivo: Avaliar eventos adversos graves relacionados à infusão e a falência renal nos pacientes que receberam altas doses de polimixina B intravenosa. Métodos: Realizamos um estudo de coorte retrospectivo, multicêntrico. Incluímos pacientes que receberam > 3mg/kg/ dia ou uma dose total ≥250mg/dia de polimixina B, no período de janeiro de 2013 a dezembro de 2015. Para a avaliação dos eventos relacionados a infusão, foram incluídos pacientes que receberam ≥ 1 dose de polimixina B e para avaliação de falência renal incluiu apenas os pacientes que receberam ≥ 48 horas de polimixina B. Os desfechos principais avaliados foram os eventos adversos graves relacionados à infusão de acordo com os Critérios de Terminologia Comuns para Eventos Adversos (CTCAE v4.0) e a falência renal, utilizamos os critérios RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End stage), para categorizar os diferentes graus de lesão renal aguda. As variáveis incluídas no estudo foram as variáveis demográficas (idade, sexo), as variáveis individuais (peso, comorbidades, escore de Charlson), os fatores de gravidade (internação em UTI, uso de vasopressor, uso de bloqueador neuromuscular), outras fármacos nefrotóxicas, dose de polimixina utilizada (total, média diária e em mg/kg/dia), associação com outros medicamentos, e características da infecção (sítio, isolamento microbiológico) foram avaliadas em análise bivariada. Variáveis com P≤0.2 foram incluídas uma a uma, em ordem crescente, em modelo de regressão de COX. Variáveis com P< 0.1 permaneceram no modelo final. Resultados: Foram incluídos 222 pacientes para análise de eventos graves relacionados à infusão. A dose média de polimixina B foi de 3.61± 0.97 mg/kg /dia (dose total media = 268 mg/kg). Ocorreram eventos adversos graves relacionados à infusão em dois pacientes, determinando uma incidência bruta de 0.9% (intervalo de confiança de 95%, 0.2-3.2): um 7 evento classificado como um risco ameaçador a vida (efeito adverso classe IV) ocorreu em um paciente, homem, de 40 anos, internado no Centro de Terapia Intensiva, com fibrose cística, que recebeu 3,3 mg / kg / dia de PMB e desenvolveu dor torácica súbita, dispnéia e hipoxemia, no quarto dia de tratamento e o outro evento adverso grave (classe III), ocorreu em um paciente, homem, 23 anos, internado na enfermaria, com linfoma, que recebeu 3,6 mg / kg / dia de PMB , que apresentou parestesia perioral, tonturas e dispnéia no primeiro dia de tratamento. A falência renal foi analisada em 115 pacientes que receberam ≥ 48 horas de polimixina B e que não estavam em diálise no início do tratamento com Polimixina B; Falência renal foi encontrada em 25 de 115 (21,7%) pacientes expostos as PMB. Nosso estudo identificou que 54 [47,0%] pacientes desenvolveram algum grau de lesão renal aguda, pelos critérios de RIFLE: risco, 15 (27,8%), injúria, 14 (25,9%) e falência, 25 (46,3%) dentro das categorias do RIFLE. Além disso, droga vasoativa, outros fármacos nefrotóxicos e clearance de creatinina foram fatores de risco independentes para falência renal. Nem a dose diária de polimixina B ajustada para o peso corporal, nem a dose diária total foram associadas a falência renal. A mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi de 60% (134 pacientes): 26% (57 pacientes) morreram durante o tratamento e nenhum óbito foi durante a infusão. Conclusão: Altas doses de polimixina B no tratamento de infecções por bactérias gramnegativo apresentaram incidência baixa de eventos adversos agudos no nosso estudo e incidência de nefrotoxicidade elevadas, mas semelhantes a alguns estudos prévios com doses usuais”. Portanto, doses elevadas podem ser testadas em ensaios clínicos, objetivando melhorar os desfechos dos pacientes gravemente doentes com infecções por bactérias multirresistentes e minimizar o surgimento da resistência a polimixina B. / Background: The emergence of multiresistant bacteria has led to a renewal in the interest of old antimicrobials, such as polymyxin B, a drug that has been discarded in the past due to its toxicity. However, at this time, this antimicrobial has become one of the most important therapeutic agents for the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant bacteria but there is still a lack of clinical studies that evaluate the safety of polymyxin B, especially in relation to the use of high doses. This strategy, high doses, may be necessary in the fight against Gramnegative bacteria with a high minimum inhibitory concentration. Patients and methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study; the period evaluated was from January 2013 to December 2015, included patients who received > 3mg/kg/day or a total dose of ≥250mg/day of polymyxin B. The study included the evaluation of infusion-related events, patients who received ≥ 1 dose of polymyxin B and patients who received ≥ 48 hours of PMB were included for evaluation of renal failure. Major outcomes were serious adverse events related to infusion according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) and categorized renal failure by the RIFLE criteria (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End stage). Factors potentially related to nephrotoxicity or mortality in 30 days were: demographic variables (age, sex), individual variables (weight, comorbidities, Charlson score), severity factors (ICU admission, use of vasopressor, use of Neuromuscular blocker), nephrotoxicity (other nephrotoxic drugs), polymyxin dose (total, daily mean and mg / Kg / day), association of drugs and infection characteristics (site and microbiological isolate) were evaluated in bivariate analysis. Variables with P≤0.2 were included one by one, in ascending order, in a Cox regression model. Variables with P <0.1 remained in the final model. Results: Two of 222 patients presented a severe infusion-related adverse event during PMB infusion, resulting in a crude incidence of 0.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.2-3.2); one was classified as life-threatening and one classified as severe (crude incidence of each adverse event, 0.45%; 95% CI, 0.08-2.5). The life-threatening adverse effect occurred in an ICU patient (crude incidence among ICU patients, 0.67%; 95% CI, 0.12-3.7), a 40-years old male with cystic fibrosis who used 3.3 mg/kg/day of PMB and developed sudden thoracic pain, dyspnea and hypoxemia, in the fourth day of treatment. The severe adverse effect occurred in a non-ICU patient (crude incidence among non-ICU patients, 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.2-7.2), a 23- years old male with lymphoma exposed to 3.6 mg/kg/day of PMB, who presented perioral 9 paresthesia, dizziness and dyspnea in the first day of treatment. Renal failure was analysed in 115 patients who received ≥48 hours of PMB and who were not previously in dialysis. A total of 54 [47.0%] patients developed any degree of AKI, categorised as Risk [27.8%]; Injury [25.9%] and Failure [46.3%]) and 25 of 115 (21.7%) patients presented renal failure Vasoactive drug, concomitant nephrotoxic drugs and baseline creatinine clearance were independent risk factors for renal failure. Neither PMB daily dose scaled by body weight nor total daily dose were associated with renal failure. In-hospital mortality was 60% (134 patients): 26% (57 patients) occurred during treatment and none during infusion. Conclusion: Results suggest that high dose regimens have similar safety profile of usual doses and could be further tested in clinical trials assessing strategies to improve patients’ outcomes and minimize the emergence of PMB resistance.
|
42 |
O papel da taxa de filtração glomerular á admissão hospitalar na incidência e na mortalidade da lesão renal aguda associada ao infarto agudo do miocárdioBruetto, Rosana Gobi 23 January 2012 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-26T12:51:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
rosanagobibruetto_dissert.pdf: 1002931 bytes, checksum: 2f0ecd040d0c3d725a801b5ea3e328e6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-01-23 / The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at admission is associated with increased risk of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the role of admission eGFR on the incidence and mortality of acute kidney injury (AKI) after AMI has been poorly studied. The aim of this study is to investigate if impaired admission eGFR influences the incidence and mortality of AKI after AMI. A total of 1.012 consecutive AMI patients from a prospective database were analyzed and 828 subjects were included. The diagnostic criteria for AKI was a percent increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 50 % from baseline (RIFLE criteria) in the first seven days of hospitalization. Patients were divided into four subgroups: admission eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and no AKI (reference), admission eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and no AKI, admission eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and AKI, admission eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and AKI. Impaired eGFR had no impact in the incidence of AKI. On the other hand, impaired admission eGFR had a striking influence on the mortality of AMI associated with AKI. In Cox multivariate analysis, 30 days mortality was significantly higher for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and no AKI (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.00, p=0.020), for eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and AKI (AHR 4.76, p < 0.001) and for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and AKI (AHR 6.27, p < 0.001) compared to patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 who did not develop AKI. One year mortality was significantly higher only for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and who developed AKI (AHR 3.05; p=0.002) compared with patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 without AKI. In conclusion, overlap of low admission eGFR and AKI development was associated with the worst early prognosis after AMI. Remarkably, the long term mortality rate in patients who developed AKI, was only increased in the group with an impaired admission eGFR. / A Taxa de filtração glomerular estimada (TFGe) < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 na admissão hospitalar está associada a risco aumentado de morte em pacientes vítimas de infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM). No entanto, a possível influência da TFGe à admissão hospitalar na incidência e na mortalidade da lesão renal aguda (LRA) associada a IAM é pouco conhecida. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar se a presença da TFGe diminuída à admissão hospitalar influencia a incidência e a mortalidade associada a LRA após IAM. Foram avaliados 1.012 pacientes consecutivos de um banco de dados prospectivo e 828 pacientes preencheram os critérios de inclusão. O critério diagnóstico de LRA foi o aumento de creatinina sérica (CrS) ≥ 50% do valor basal (critério RIFLE), durante os primeiros sete dias de internação. Os pacientes foram divididos em quatro grupos após estimar a TFG na admissão: TFGe ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e sem LRA (referência); TFGe < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e sem LRA; TFGe ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e que desenvolveram LRA; TFGe < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e que desenvolveram LRA. A TFGe diminuída na admissão não teve impacto na incidência da LRA. Por outro lado, a TFGe diminuída na admissão foi associada às taxas de mortalidade mais elevadas em pacientes que desenvolveram LRA após IAM. Na análise múltipla de Cox, os grupos que apresentaram associação independente com mortalidade em 30 dias foram: TFGe < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e sem LRA (hazard ratio ajustada [HRA] 2,00; p=0,020), TFGe ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e que desenvolveram LRA (HRA 4,76; p < 0,001) e TFGe < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 com desenvolvimento de LRA (HRA 6,27; p< 0,001) em comparação com pacientes com TFGe ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73m2 que não desenvolveram LRA. Em um ano, apenas o grupo com TFGe < 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e que desenvolveu LRA apresentou maior mortalidade (HRA 3,05; p=0,002) em comparação aos pacientes com TFGe ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73m2 e que não desenvolveram LRA. Concluímos que a associação entre TFGe diminuída na admissão e o desenvolvimento de LRA foram associados a um pior prognóstico a curto prazo após o IAM. Entre os pacientes que desenvolveram LRA foi observado aumento na mortalidade a longo prazo somente no grupo com TFGe diminuída na admissão.
|
43 |
A incidência da lesão renal aguda e mortalidade após o infarto agudo do miocárdio: comparação entre os critérios AKIN e RIFLERodrigues, Fernando Bruetto 08 March 2012 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-26T12:51:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
fernandobruettorodrigues_tese.pdf: 4591975 bytes, checksum: b79f74b1b34f2f124a27ea0da5458969 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-03-08 / Acute kidney injury (AKI) increases the risk of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Recently, two new AKI definitions were proposed: Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN). There are no data comparing AMI-related AKIs diagnosed by both criteria. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence and mortality of AKI diagnosed by RIFLE and AKIN in the AMI acute phase. In total, 1050 consecutive AMI patients were studied. AKI defined by RIFLE and AKIN occurred in 14.8% and 42.7% of patients, respectively, in the first 7 days of hospitalization. This difference resulted from the larger number of patients in AKIN stage 1 (36.2%) compared with the number in RIFLE stage Risk (9.6%, p < 0.001). Both AKI criteria were associated with an increased Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) for 30-day and 1-year mortality. The subgroup of patients classified as non-AKI by RIFLE but as AKI by AKIN criteria showed an increased AHR for death (2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 4.51, p=0.003) at 30 days and at 1 year (1.99; 95% CI 1.20 3.31, p=0.008) compared with patients without AKI. In conclusion, AKIN has detected more AKI than RIFLE in the acute phase of AMI. Both definitions were associated with increased early and late mortality. Patients diagnosed with AKI by AKIN but not by RIFLE showed an increased AHR for early and late mortality. / A lesão Renal Aguda (LRA) aumenta o risco de morte, após o Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio (IAM). Recentemente, duas novas definições para LRA foram propostas: RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney disease) e AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network). Ainda não existem estudos comparando o diagnóstico de LRA por ambos critérios, após IAM. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar os critérios AKIN e RIFLE quanto à incidência de LRA e mortalidade na fase aguda do IAM. Um total de 1.050 pacientes consecutivos com IAM foi estudado. A LRA definida por RIFLE ocorreu em 14,8% e por AKIN em 42,7% dos pacientes nos primeiros sete dias de internação. A diferença ocorreu devido a um grande número de pacientes no estágio um de AKIN (36,2%) em comparação com a categoria Risk do RIFLE (9,6%; p < 0,001). Ambos os critérios para LRA foram associados com aumento da Hazard Ratio Ajustada (HRA) para mortalidade em 30 dias e um ano. O sub-grupo de pacientes classificado com não LRA por RIFLE, mas como LRA por AKIN apresentou uma HRA para morte (2,49; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95% 1,37-4,51; p = 0,003) em 30 dias e em 1 ano (1,99; IC 95% 1,20-3,31; p = 0,008) em comparação a pacientes sem LRA. Concluímos que o critério AKIN detectou mais LRA que o RIFLE na fase aguda do IAM. Ambos os critérios foram associados com aumento da mortalidade precoce e tardia. Pacientes diagnosticados como LRA por AKIN, mas não por RIFLE também apresentaram um aumento da HRA para mortalidade precoce e tardia.
|
44 |
Rätt beväpning för uppgiften : en jämförelse av vapensystem för en sjukvårdsgrupp / Right armament for the task : a comparison of weapons for medicsHansson, Mattias January 2013 (has links)
Sjukvårdsfunktionen i Försvarsmakten är viktig när skador uppkommer. Försvarsmaktens förmåga eller oförmåga att erbjuda soldater kvalificerad sjukvård är avgörande för soldaternas förtroende till den egna förmågan. De svenska sjukvårdarna förväntas att oavsett terräng och hot kunna ta hand om en patient i nöd, de är därför utrustade med vapen för att kunna skydda sig själva och sin patient. I Försvarsmakten betyder det att sjukvårdaren bär en automatkarbin 5. Den här uppsatsen kommer att undersöka hur tre olika vapensystem passar in i rollen som huvudbeväpning på en sjukvårdsgrupp. Undersökningen visar att en PDW (Personal Defence Weapon) skulle vara ett bra alternativ till befintlig beväpning. / The ability to provide a good medical treatment to injured service personnel in the Swedish Armed Forces is important, but the Armed Forces' ability or inability to provide soldiers qualified care is also vital for the members of the armed forces confidence for their own ability. Swedish medics are expected to take care of a patient, whatever the terrain and threat may be. Swedish medics aren’t considered to be combatants in war or conflict but the law gives them the right to defend themselves and their patients. They are currently equipped with the Ak 5 to protect themselves and their patients, a weapon that is used by all service personel In the Swedish Armed Forces, this means that the medics carry a full length rifle. This report will examine the weapon best suited for a medical team to carry out its duties while also providing a level of personal protection should the need arise.
|
45 |
Skyttekompani : Ett didaktiskt perspektiv på taktiska föreställningar 1975 och 2012 / Rifle company : A didactic perspective on tactical concepts 1975 and 2012Johansson, Martin January 2013 (has links)
Sedan kalla kriget har inte bara omvärlden och föreställningen av motståndaren förändrats utan även reglementenas utformning. I dagsläget används på kompaninivå ett reglemente för alla manöverkompanier, tidigare har det i försvarsmakten funnits reglementen för specifika typer av kompanier. Denna uppsats behandlar vilken påverkan detta har på tydligheten i reglementena.Arbetet syftar till att undersöka tydlighet i föreställningar om infanteriförbandens taktik på kompaninivå idag jämfört med under mitten av kalla kriget i två vägledande instruktioner. Detta för att diskutera artikulering av taktik och dess implikationer på officersutbildning inom försvarsmakten. Den metod som används är kvalitativ textanalys med en komparativ design. Som analysverktyg har de grundläggande förmågorna använts och empirin utgörs av två reglementen, Infanterireglemente skyttekompani 1975 och markstridsreglemente 5 kompani.Undersökningen resulterar i att författaren upptäcker en tydlig skillnad i hur framför allt verkan och skydd artikuleras i de olika reglementena. I diskussionen visar det sig att detta kan bero på ett antal faktorer. Även utformningen av reglementet diskuteras och resultatet blir då, att för att finna vägledning i markstridsreglemente 5 kompani krävs tidigare erfarenhet av förbandstypen. Denna erfarenhet kan också påverka tolkningen av instruktionen. / Since the Cold War has not only the outside world and the perception of the opponent changed but also regulations design. In the current situation there is a Company level regulation for all fighting companies, when it previously was regulations for each of the specific types of companies. This paper discusses the impact that has on the clarity of the regulations.The work aims to investigate the transparency of notions of infantry formation tactics at company level today than during the middle of the Cold War in two guiding instructions. This is to discuss the articulation of tactics and its implications on the officer training in the armed forces. The method used is qualitative text analysis with a comparative design. To make the analysis the fundamental capabilities are used and empirical data consists of two regulations, Infanterireglemente skyttekompani 1975 and markstridsreglemente 5 kompani.The survey results in the author discovering a clear difference in how the capabilities effect and protection are articulated in the various the regulations. In the discussion, it appears that this may be due to a number of factors. The design of the regulations is also discussed and the result is that in order to find guidance in markstridsreglemente 5 kompani the reader needs previous experience of the specific company type. This experience can also affect the interpretation of the instruction.
|
46 |
Fatores de risco associados à nefrotoxicidade em pacientes Tratados com polimixina B / Risk factors associated with nephrotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxin BMoresco, Isabel Cristina 08 March 2018 (has links)
Submitted by Rosangela Silva (rosangela.silva3@unioeste.br) on 2018-05-24T17:46:38Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
Isabel Cristina Moresco.pdf: 778049 bytes, checksum: 0c5c3dc6a4ac6f42d2f9a40313cd38c6 (MD5)
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-24T17:46:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Isabel Cristina Moresco.pdf: 778049 bytes, checksum: 0c5c3dc6a4ac6f42d2f9a40313cd38c6 (MD5)
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-08 / In the last 20 years, with the emergence of multiresistant gram-negative
bacteria, polymyxins, which had fallen into disuse due to their high toxicity, were
once again used as an alternative for the treatment of these infections. This antibiotic
group is active against most enterobacteria and non-fermenting gram-negative
bacteria, ocular, urinary tract, meninges, and bloodstream infections. The
recommended dose of polymyxin B (PMB) in patients with normal renal function is
1.5 to 2.5 mg.kg-1.day-1 and the dose can be divided twice. For patients with impaired
renal function, it is recommended to adjust the dose according to creatinine
clearance. Because nephrotoxicity is the major limiting factor in the use of this class
of antibiotics, a retrospective observational study was conducted to identify possible
risk factors for the development of acute renal injury (ARF) in patients using the
antibiotic PMB. The necessary information was collected to perform the study in
medical records, medical prescriptions and results of laboratory tests from the
patients who used PMB in a period of 5 years in a Brazilian hospital. Inclusion criteria
for the study were: patients over 18 years of age who used intravenous PMB for
more than 72 hours. To classify ARI levels, baseline creatinine was calculated by the
average of the last five serum creatinine tests before the first dose of the antibiotic.
This calculated value and the highest level of serum creatinine during treatment were
used to identify and classify renal damage according to the criteria of the RIFLE
(Risk, Injury and Failure and Loss and End-stage renal disease) filtration rate. The
study included 120 patients, most of them male (89; 74.2%) with an average age of
50 years. The most frequent pre-existing comorbidities were systemic hypertension
(50; 41.7%), diabetes mellitus (21; 17.5%), nephropathies (14; 11.7%) and obesity
(13; 10.8%). The main infection was pneumonia (35.8%) and the most frequently
identified infectious agent was Acinetobacter baumannii (67.9%). PMB treatments
were performed for 13 days and the average daily dose was 191.5 mg. The high
incidence of mortality in the studied population (46.7%) may be related to the critical
clinical status of the patients, because at some point of hospitalization, 111 patients
(92.5%) needed intensive care. In the population studied to evaluate risk factors, 12
patients (13.5%) presented risk, 22 (25.0%) injury, 30 (34.1%) renal failure,
according to RIFLE criteria. In addition, in the group that patients developed ARF,
51.9% died, whereas in the group that did not present, only 12.5% died. There was a
statistically significant difference between the groups that developed or not ARF, for
the following variables: treatment time greater than 10 days, accumulated PMB dose,
hypoalbuminemia and concomitant use of furosemide. However, the variables that
remained in the final multivariate logistic regression model were treatment time
greater than 10 days and hypoalbuminemia. Several factors inherent to the patient
and the drug are related to ARF and strategies should be created in order to
minimize these effects. The monitoring of renal function in all patients, especially
those at risk, and the follow-up of the infection to reduce the time of treatment are
highlighted. / Nos últimos 20 anos, com o surgimento de bactérias gram-negativas
multirresistentes, as polimixinas, que tinham caído em desuso pela elevada
toxicidade, voltaram a ser utilizadas como uma alternativa para tratamento dessas
infecções. Esse grupo de antibiótico é ativo contra a maioria das enterobactérias e
das bactérias gram-negativas não fermentadoras, em infecções oculares, do trato
urinário, das meninges e da corrente sanguínea. A dose recomendada de polimixina
B (PMB), em pacientes com função renal normal, é de 1,5 a 2,5 mg Kg-1 dia-1 e a
dose pode ser dividida em duas vezes. Para os pacientes com alteração da função
renal, recomenda-se ajustar a dose de acordo com a depuração de creatinina. Como
a nefrotoxicidade é o maior limitante do uso dessa classe de antibióticos, um estudo
observacional retrospectivo foi realizado com o objetivo de identificar os possíveis
fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de injúria renal aguda (IRA) em pacientes
que utilizaram o antibiótico PMB. Foram coletadas as informações necessárias para
realizar o estudo em prontuários, prescrições médicas e resultados de exames
laboratoriais dos pacientes que utilizaram PMB em um período de 5 anos em um
hospital brasileiro. Os critérios de inclusão para o estudo foram: pacientes maiores
de 18 anos que utilizaram PMB por via endovenosa por mais de 72 horas. Para
classificar os níveis de IRA, a creatinina basal foi calculada pela média entre os
cinco últimos exames de creatinina sérica antes da primeira dose do antibiótico.
Esse valor calculado e o maior nível de creatinina sérica durante o tratamento foram
usados para identificar e classificar o dano renal segundo os critérios da taxa de
filtração glomerular de RIFLE (Risk, Injury and Failure and Loss, and End-stage renal
disease). Foram inclusos no estudo 120 pacientes, a maioria do sexo masculino (89;
74,2%) com média de idade de 50 anos. As comorbidades pré-existentes presentes
com maior frequência foram hipertensão arterial sistêmica (50; 41,7%), diabetes
mellitus (21; 17,5%) nefropatias (14; 11,7%) e obesidade (13; 10,8%). A principal
infecção tratada foi pneumonia (35,8%) e o agente infeccioso mais identificado foi o
Acinetobacter baumannii (67,9%). Os tratamentos com a PMB foram realizados
durante 13 dias e a dose média diária de 191,5 mg. A alta incidência de mortalidade
da população estudada (46,7%) pode estar relacionada ao estado clínico crítico dos
pacientes, pois, em algum momento do internamento, 111 pacientes (92,5%)
precisaram de cuidados intensivos. Na população estudada para avaliar os fatores
de risco, 12 pacientes (13,5%) apresentam risco, 22 (25,0%) injúria, 30 (34,1%)
falência renal, segundo os critérios de RIFLE. Além disso, no grupo que os pacientes
desenvolveram IRA, 51,9% foram a óbito, enquanto que no grupo que não
apresentou foram apenas 12,5%. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa
entre os grupos que desenvolveram, ou não, IRA, para as seguintes variáveis:
tempo de tratamento superior a 10 dias, dose acumulada de PMB, hipoalbuminemia
e uso concomitante de furosemida. Porém, as variáveis que permaneceram no
modelo final de regressão logística multivariável foram o tempo de tratamento
superior a 10 dias e a hipoalbuminemia. Vários fatores inerentes ao paciente e à
droga estão relacionados à IRA e estratégias devem ser criadas com o intuito de
minimizar esses efeitos. Destacam-se a monitorização da função renal em todos os
pacientes, principalmente os de risco, e o acompanhamento da infecção para
diminuir o tempo de tratamento.
|
47 |
"Gun's don't kill people, people kill people" : En argumentationsanalys av debatten kring skärpta vapenlagar i USATonentschuk, Matilda January 2017 (has links)
The discussion regarding the second amendment and gun control in the United States has been a controversial and highly debated topic for many years. However, with the several school shootings taking place, the discussion about gun controls has been taken to a new level. The purpose of this essay is to give an overview of the debate and answer to the main question ”how is the relationship between freedom and rights expressed in the debate about strengthened gun control, in relation to positive and negative liberty, and over time? In order to achieve the purpose, three different kinds of analyzes have been made. First, two pro-contra analyzes were made on two different occasions. Next, the arguments found was examined through two concepts of liberty: positive and negative liberty. Lastly, a comparison was made between the arguments from the two different occasions. The results show that there are three different core issues in the debate, and that positive liberty is dominating the pro-gun control side, while negative liberty and individual rights are dominating the contra-gun control side. The debate has not been going through a radical change. However, some arguments have grown stronger over the years.
|
48 |
Vliv vyšší nadmořské výšky na úspěšnost střelby v biatlonu / The influence of high altitude on shooting efficiency of biathletes.Boudíková, Adéla January 2015 (has links)
The main purpose was describe the issue of shooting success rate at high altitude (1 500 - 3 000m a. s. l.). Shooting success rate of elite racers was evaluated using analysation of results from individual races at high altitude in the period 1990/1991 - 2013/2014. High altitude had no statistical effect (p<0,05) on shooting success rate of women and men biathletes in the comparision with lowland but it had more negative effect to women shooting success rate than men shooting success rate. Ten national level biathletes were tested in three tests in lowland, four tests at high altitude and five tests in lowland after the return from high altitude. The test included rest shooting in the prone and standing positions and load shooting in both positions which took part of three kilometers running. Twelve days training camp at high altitude did not improve shooting success rate, shooting velocity and running time in the determinated heart rate. Rest shooting and shooting in the prone position did not change statistically during the whole testing period. At high altitude critical days were registered in load shooting in standing position (6th day, p<0,05) and average running time (9th day, p<0,05). Rifle manipulation and shooting are automate motions which are not influenced by high altitude. Most...
|
49 |
Vliv vyšší nadmořské výšky na úspěšnost střelby v biatlonu / The influence of high altitude on shooting efficiency of biathletes.Boudíková, Adéla January 2015 (has links)
The main purpose was describe the issue of shooting success rate at high altitude (1 500 - 3 000m a. s. l.). Shooting success rate of elite racers was evaluated using analysation of results from individual races at high altitude in the period 1990/1991 - 2013/2014. High altitude had no statistical effect (p<0,05) on shooting success rate of women and men biathletes in the comparision with lowland but it had more negative effect to women shooting success rate than men shooting success rate. Ten national level biathletes were tested in three tests in lowland, four tests at high altitude and five tests in lowland after the return from high altitude. The test included rest shooting in the prone and standing positions and load shooting in both positions which took part of three kilometers running. Twelve days training camp at high altitude did not improve shooting success rate, shooting velocity and running time in the determinated heart rate. Rest shooting and shooting in the prone position did not change statistically during the whole testing period. At high altitude critical days were registered in load shooting in standing position (6th day, p<0,05) and average running time (9th day, p<0,05). Rifle manipulation and shooting are automate motions which are not influenced by high altitude. Most...
|
50 |
Movements, Malefactions, and Munitions: Determinants and Effects of Concealed Carry Laws in the United StatesSteidley, Trent Taylor 03 November 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.2355 seconds