No description available.

Yes / There is global interest in the reconfiguration of community mental health services, including primary care, to improve clinical and cost effectiveness. This study seeks to describe patterns of service use, continuity of care, health risks, physical healthcare monitoring and the balance between primary and secondary mental healthcare for people with severe mental illness in receipt of secondary mental healthcare in the UK. We conducted an epidemiological medical records review in three UK sites. We identified 297 cases randomly selected from the three participating mental health services. Data were manually extracted from electronic patient medical records from both secondary and primary care, for a 2-year period (2012-2014). Continuous data were summarised by mean and s.d. or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical data were summarised as percentages. The majority of care was from secondary care practitioners: of the 18 210 direct contacts recorded, 76% were from secondary care (median, 36.5; IQR, 14-68) and 24% were from primary care (median, 10; IQR, 5-20). There was evidence of poor longitudinal continuity: in primary care, 31% of people had poor longitudinal continuity (Modified Modified Continuity Index ≤0.5), and 43% had a single named care coordinator in secondary care services over the 2 years. The study indicates scope for improvement in supporting mental health service delivery in primary care. Greater knowledge of how care is organised presents an opportunity to ensure some rebalancing of the care that all people with severe mental illness receive, when they need it. A future publication will examine differences between the three sites that participated in this study. / This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (grant reference no. RP-PG-0611-20004). Professors Siobhan Reilly, Richard Byng and Max Birchwood are partially supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for North West Coast, Care South West Peninsula and West Midlands, respectively.

La prise en charge des patients souffrant d’un trouble mental justifie une meilleure compréhension des mécanismes influençant les comportements des patients et des cliniciens vis-à-vis des stratégies thérapeutiques. Le principal objectif de cette thèse est d’étudier et d’identifier le rôle des attitudes des patients et des cliniciens vis-à-vis du comportement d’usage d’une thérapeutique. Pour cela, nous avons réalisé plusieurs études permettant d’appréhender cette problématique dans différentes pathologies et envers différentes thérapeutiques.Concernant les attitudes des patients envers leur traitement, nous avons détaillé un travail visant à évaluer les croyances de patients souffrant de schizophrénie envers leur antipsychotique et une étude qualitative sur les attitudes des patients bipolaires envers leur prise en charge en phase d’euthymie. Nous avons montré l’impact des attitudes négatives sur le niveau d’observance ou d’adhésion des patients à leur prise en charge et l’intérêt de cibler des stratégies de prise en charge individualisées visant à améliorer ces attitudes. Concernant les psychiatres, nous avons présenté une étude évaluant les attitudes des cliniciens vis-à-vis des recommandations professionnelles ainsi qu’un travail concernant leurs attitudes envers les antipsychotiques d’action prolongée. Certaines attitudes des psychiatres apparaissaient associées à une plus faible utilisation des recommandations ou des formulations d’action prolongée. Nos résultats montrent ainsi que l’observance ou l’adhésion des patients à une prise en charge ou le choix thérapeutique des cliniciens sont sous-tendus par leurs attitudes. L’étude des attitudes dans le domaine de la santé mentale apparaît comme une étape indispensable dans la compréhension de certains comportements d’usage des thérapeutiques. Les données issues des travaux présentés mais aussi d’études récentes permettent d’envisager un changement de paradigme dans l’appréhension des comportements d’observance des patients et de décision médicale des cliniciens dans le choix d’une thérapeutique centré sur leurs attitudes. / The management of patients with severe mental illnesses needs a better understanding of thefactors affecting the behaviours of clinicians and patients toward therapeutic strategies.The main objective of this thesis was to assess and identify the role of the clinician’s attitudes and patients’ attitudes toward the medication use behaviour. We conducted several studies to address this point in different mental disorders and for different type of treatment. Concerning the patients ‘attitudes toward treatment, we reported data from a study assessing the beliefs toward antipsychotics of schizophrenic patients and from a qualitative study assessing the patient’s attitudes toward the management of bipolar disorder in euthymic periods. We showed that the negative attitudes had a marked impact on the level of adherence of patients and could determine individual targets of interventions to improve them. Concerning the psychiatrists, we reported two studies assessing the clinician’s attitudes toward guidelines and long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Some specific attitudes were associated with a lower use of guidelines or long-acting formulations. These findings showed that the adherence of patient to treatment and the medical decisions of clinicians were related to their attitudes. The assessment of attitudes or beliefs in the field of mental health appears to be an essential step to promote a better comprehension of some treatment use behaviours. Our results and from other recent studies support a new paradigm for the patient adherence to treatment and the medical decision of clinicians focused on their attitudes as predicting variables.

A prevalência de Doença Mental Grave (do inglês Severe Mental Illness, SMI) atinge 5,4% em um ano segundo os estudos Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area e National Comorbidity Survey. O conceito de SMI surgiu na década de 1970 para o planejamento dos serviços de saúde e apresentou importância crescente a partir do movimento de desinstitucionalização psiquiátrica. Uma das definições para SMI deriva do NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) em 1987, e utiliza como critérios a presença de prejuízo funcional, decorrente de déficits em aspectos básicos do dia-a-dia, bem como a duração da doença. Casos agudos de SMI podem necessitar tratamento em Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica em Hospital Geral (UIPHG). No entanto, há poucos estudos disponíveis no Brasil avaliando esta modalidade de tratamento e os desfechos destes pacientes. Evidências também apontam que os pacientes com transtornos psiquiátricos apresentam níveis reduzidos de Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Cérebro (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, BDNF). O BDNF age no sistema nervoso central (SNC) promovendo crescimento e diferenciação de neurônios. Dentro deste contexto, a presente tese apresenta como objetivo principal a avaliação naturalística de desfechos clínicos e funcionais, associados à avaliação dos níveis séricos de BDNF, em pacientes com SMI. Os pacientes que foram encaminhados para tratamento na Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre foram incluídos se apresentassem os critérios de SMI: Avaliação Global de Funcionamento (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF) menor ou igual a 50 e tempo de tratamento maior ou igual a dois anos. As avaliações ocorreram em dois momentos (admissão e alta). Compreenderam avaliação sociodemográfica, clínica e coleta de sangue (com dosagem de BDNF sérico). Foram realizadas avaliação diagnóstica pelo Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) e aplicação das escalas Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-S), GAF e World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref). Ainda, foram aplicadas escalas específicas nos diagnósticos principais (i.e., depressão maior, depressão bipolar, episódio maníaco, esquizofrenia): Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D); Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). O primeiro artigo desta tese descreve os desfechos clínicos, funcionais e também de qualidade de vida durante a internação psiquiátrica. Observou-se melhora significativa nos parâmetros avaliados nos pacientes com SMI como um todo. Os pacientes com episódio maníaco apresentaram maior chance (em relação aos com episódio depressivo) de atingir remissão pela CGI (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03). A duração média da hospitalização (LOS) foi 28,95 (± 19,86) dias. No segundo artigo, observou-se redução dos níveis séricos de BDNF nos pacientes com SMI em relação aos controles saudáveis, independentemente do diagnóstico. Houve aumento significativo no BDNF entre a admissão e a alta. Os resultados apresentados replicam dados previamente publicados a partir de amostra única de pacientes com SMI, sua característica diferencial. Estes resultados reforçam que a internação em UIPHG, uma intervenção relativamente breve, demonstra desfechos positivos e é alternativa bem estabelecida no tratamento da SMI. Além disso, a redução inespecífica do BDNF sérico seguida de um pequeno aumento associado ao tratamento reforçam a possibilidade do BDNF como marcador transdiagnóstico de transtorno mental. / The estimated prevalence of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) according to Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area and National Comorbidity Survey studies is 5.4% in one year. One suggested definition of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) derives from the 1987 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) definition and is based on two criteria: 1. duration, characterized as involving “prolonged illness”, and 2. disability, which includes dangerous or disturbing social behavior, and mild impairment in achieving basic needs. These acute psychiatric conditions may require psychiatric inpatient treatment located in acute wards in General Hospitals. However, little data is currently available evaluating the characteristics and the outcomes during an acute inpatient stay in Brazil. Evidence also suggests that Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are significantly decreased in neuropsychiatric disorders. BDNF is found throughout the brain and is involved in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. So, the main objectives of this work are to evaluate SMI patients’ outcomes during treatment in a psychiatric unit in a general hospital by symptomatology, functionality, quality of life and by the evaluation of BDNF serum levels. After the admission to a psychiatric unit in a general hospital in Brazil, patients were included and if they had two of the SMI criteria: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ≤ 50 and duration of services contact ≥ 2 years. Patients were assessed in admission and upon discharge with Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), GAF, World Health Organization’s QOL Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref) and diagnostic specific scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAM-D; Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS; and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-A). Blood samples were also obtained. The first manuscript showed that SMI patients had marked and significant improvements in symptomatic and functional measures during psychiatric hospitalization. Patients with manic episode had higher chance of CGI remission (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03) when compared with patients with depressive episode. Mean LOS was 28.95 (± 19.86) days. The second manuscript showed that BDNF serum levels were equally reduced among different SMI diagnoses. Also, the observed improvements in SMI patients were associated with a significant, but small increase in mean serum BDNF levels. Therefore, the results replicate evidence from previous findings in single samples, suggesting that SMI patients can have marked acute improvements during a a relatively short intervention (approximately 1 month) represented by the psychiatric hospitalization in a general tertiary hospital. Also, the similar reduction observed in BDNF levels among SMI patients with different diagnoses and the significant increase but non-restoration indicate that BDNF serum levels could be considered a marker for the presence of an unspecific psychiatric disorder and possibly a transdiagnostic and unspecific marker of disease activity.

<p>The aim of this thesis was to critically examine the current use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) in outcome assessment for service evaluation. A further aim was to propose a metric for assessing the adequacy of community mental health services in meeting ongoing needs over longer stretches of time.</p><p>We made four prospective follow-up studies of CAN assessments of patients with severe mental illness in community-based mental health care.</p><p>A factor analysis (n=741) gave support for a three-factor model, comprising only 60% of the CAN items. Need assessments (n= 92) in 1997 and 2003 were compared at both the summed total and the underlying item levels of the CAN. The mean total scores did not change, yet there were significant changes in the underlying items. Changes in mean number of needs between 1997 and 1999 were measured (n=262) with both total scores, summed over all CAN items, and with sub-total scores, summed over two sets of items reflecting the social services and the psychiatric services respectively. As indicated by the sub-total scores, all significant changes occurred within the psychiatric services, a result not possible to discern from the total scores. The Met Needs Index (MNI), defined by us as the aggregate measure of beneficial outcome, indicated that needs in general were met during 71% of the intervals between the annuals assessments from 1997 through 2004. However, the variation among particular items was large.</p><p>In conclusion, the summary scores typically used as outcome measures are likely to conceal meaningful variation at the item level. Nevertheless, sub-total scores, being more transparent, might be more useful in outcome assessment. The MNI is a continuous, normally distributed metric, estimable over any number of consecutive assessments, which seems suitable for assessing the achieved benefit of services for patients with long-term ongoing needs.</p>

The aim of this thesis was to critically examine the current use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) in outcome assessment for service evaluation. A further aim was to propose a metric for assessing the adequacy of community mental health services in meeting ongoing needs over longer stretches of time. We made four prospective follow-up studies of CAN assessments of patients with severe mental illness in community-based mental health care. A factor analysis (n=741) gave support for a three-factor model, comprising only 60% of the CAN items. Need assessments (n= 92) in 1997 and 2003 were compared at both the summed total and the underlying item levels of the CAN. The mean total scores did not change, yet there were significant changes in the underlying items. Changes in mean number of needs between 1997 and 1999 were measured (n=262) with both total scores, summed over all CAN items, and with sub-total scores, summed over two sets of items reflecting the social services and the psychiatric services respectively. As indicated by the sub-total scores, all significant changes occurred within the psychiatric services, a result not possible to discern from the total scores. The Met Needs Index (MNI), defined by us as the aggregate measure of beneficial outcome, indicated that needs in general were met during 71% of the intervals between the annuals assessments from 1997 through 2004. However, the variation among particular items was large. In conclusion, the summary scores typically used as outcome measures are likely to conceal meaningful variation at the item level. Nevertheless, sub-total scores, being more transparent, might be more useful in outcome assessment. The MNI is a continuous, normally distributed metric, estimable over any number of consecutive assessments, which seems suitable for assessing the achieved benefit of services for patients with long-term ongoing needs.

Bakgrund: Genom historien har personer med allvarlig psykisk störning ofta tvingats leva avskilda och utstötta från samhället, en stigmatisering som finns kvar än idag. Syfte: Syftet med litteraturstudien var att belysa hur personer med allvarlig psykisk störning upplever sin sociala situation samt hur dessa personer upplever att sociala relationer påverkar återhämtningen från allvarlig psykisk störning. Metod: Till studien eftersöktes kvalitativa artiklar i relevanta databaser, nio stycken artiklar som passade studiens syfte valdes ut. Artiklarna genomgick manifest innehållsanalys, två huvudkategorier och ett flertal underkategorier kunde urskiljas. Resultat: I litteraturstudien framgick att personer med allvarlig psykisk störning känner sig utstötta från samhället och upplever fördomar riktade mot sig. Svårigheter med sociala kontakter leder till ensamhet. Önskan om meningsfulla aktiviteter fanns för att få en mer meningsfull vardag och lättare kunna knyta kontakter med andra. De sociala relationernas betydelse för återhämtningen från allvarlig psykisk störning framkom tydligt i litteraturstudien. Familj, vänner och vårdare bidrog samtliga till återhämtningsprocessen. Slutsats: Personerna upplevde en stigmatisering som bidrog till att försämra deras sociala situation, vilket bidrar till ökat lidande. Alla inom vården är en viktig del för att minska detta. Sociala relationer som medför att bli sedd och bekräftad som människa är viktigt för återhämtningen från allvarlig psykisk störning.

A prevalência de Doença Mental Grave (do inglês Severe Mental Illness, SMI) atinge 5,4% em um ano segundo os estudos Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area e National Comorbidity Survey. O conceito de SMI surgiu na década de 1970 para o planejamento dos serviços de saúde e apresentou importância crescente a partir do movimento de desinstitucionalização psiquiátrica. Uma das definições para SMI deriva do NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) em 1987, e utiliza como critérios a presença de prejuízo funcional, decorrente de déficits em aspectos básicos do dia-a-dia, bem como a duração da doença. Casos agudos de SMI podem necessitar tratamento em Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica em Hospital Geral (UIPHG). No entanto, há poucos estudos disponíveis no Brasil avaliando esta modalidade de tratamento e os desfechos destes pacientes. Evidências também apontam que os pacientes com transtornos psiquiátricos apresentam níveis reduzidos de Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Cérebro (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, BDNF). O BDNF age no sistema nervoso central (SNC) promovendo crescimento e diferenciação de neurônios. Dentro deste contexto, a presente tese apresenta como objetivo principal a avaliação naturalística de desfechos clínicos e funcionais, associados à avaliação dos níveis séricos de BDNF, em pacientes com SMI. Os pacientes que foram encaminhados para tratamento na Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre foram incluídos se apresentassem os critérios de SMI: Avaliação Global de Funcionamento (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF) menor ou igual a 50 e tempo de tratamento maior ou igual a dois anos. As avaliações ocorreram em dois momentos (admissão e alta). Compreenderam avaliação sociodemográfica, clínica e coleta de sangue (com dosagem de BDNF sérico). Foram realizadas avaliação diagnóstica pelo Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) e aplicação das escalas Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-S), GAF e World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref). Ainda, foram aplicadas escalas específicas nos diagnósticos principais (i.e., depressão maior, depressão bipolar, episódio maníaco, esquizofrenia): Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D); Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). O primeiro artigo desta tese descreve os desfechos clínicos, funcionais e também de qualidade de vida durante a internação psiquiátrica. Observou-se melhora significativa nos parâmetros avaliados nos pacientes com SMI como um todo. Os pacientes com episódio maníaco apresentaram maior chance (em relação aos com episódio depressivo) de atingir remissão pela CGI (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03). A duração média da hospitalização (LOS) foi 28,95 (± 19,86) dias. No segundo artigo, observou-se redução dos níveis séricos de BDNF nos pacientes com SMI em relação aos controles saudáveis, independentemente do diagnóstico. Houve aumento significativo no BDNF entre a admissão e a alta. Os resultados apresentados replicam dados previamente publicados a partir de amostra única de pacientes com SMI, sua característica diferencial. Estes resultados reforçam que a internação em UIPHG, uma intervenção relativamente breve, demonstra desfechos positivos e é alternativa bem estabelecida no tratamento da SMI. Além disso, a redução inespecífica do BDNF sérico seguida de um pequeno aumento associado ao tratamento reforçam a possibilidade do BDNF como marcador transdiagnóstico de transtorno mental. / The estimated prevalence of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) according to Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area and National Comorbidity Survey studies is 5.4% in one year. One suggested definition of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) derives from the 1987 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) definition and is based on two criteria: 1. duration, characterized as involving “prolonged illness”, and 2. disability, which includes dangerous or disturbing social behavior, and mild impairment in achieving basic needs. These acute psychiatric conditions may require psychiatric inpatient treatment located in acute wards in General Hospitals. However, little data is currently available evaluating the characteristics and the outcomes during an acute inpatient stay in Brazil. Evidence also suggests that Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are significantly decreased in neuropsychiatric disorders. BDNF is found throughout the brain and is involved in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. So, the main objectives of this work are to evaluate SMI patients’ outcomes during treatment in a psychiatric unit in a general hospital by symptomatology, functionality, quality of life and by the evaluation of BDNF serum levels. After the admission to a psychiatric unit in a general hospital in Brazil, patients were included and if they had two of the SMI criteria: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ≤ 50 and duration of services contact ≥ 2 years. Patients were assessed in admission and upon discharge with Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), GAF, World Health Organization’s QOL Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref) and diagnostic specific scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAM-D; Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS; and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-A). Blood samples were also obtained. The first manuscript showed that SMI patients had marked and significant improvements in symptomatic and functional measures during psychiatric hospitalization. Patients with manic episode had higher chance of CGI remission (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03) when compared with patients with depressive episode. Mean LOS was 28.95 (± 19.86) days. The second manuscript showed that BDNF serum levels were equally reduced among different SMI diagnoses. Also, the observed improvements in SMI patients were associated with a significant, but small increase in mean serum BDNF levels. Therefore, the results replicate evidence from previous findings in single samples, suggesting that SMI patients can have marked acute improvements during a a relatively short intervention (approximately 1 month) represented by the psychiatric hospitalization in a general tertiary hospital. Also, the similar reduction observed in BDNF levels among SMI patients with different diagnoses and the significant increase but non-restoration indicate that BDNF serum levels could be considered a marker for the presence of an unspecific psychiatric disorder and possibly a transdiagnostic and unspecific marker of disease activity.

A prevalência de Doença Mental Grave (do inglês Severe Mental Illness, SMI) atinge 5,4% em um ano segundo os estudos Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area e National Comorbidity Survey. O conceito de SMI surgiu na década de 1970 para o planejamento dos serviços de saúde e apresentou importância crescente a partir do movimento de desinstitucionalização psiquiátrica. Uma das definições para SMI deriva do NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) em 1987, e utiliza como critérios a presença de prejuízo funcional, decorrente de déficits em aspectos básicos do dia-a-dia, bem como a duração da doença. Casos agudos de SMI podem necessitar tratamento em Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica em Hospital Geral (UIPHG). No entanto, há poucos estudos disponíveis no Brasil avaliando esta modalidade de tratamento e os desfechos destes pacientes. Evidências também apontam que os pacientes com transtornos psiquiátricos apresentam níveis reduzidos de Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Cérebro (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, BDNF). O BDNF age no sistema nervoso central (SNC) promovendo crescimento e diferenciação de neurônios. Dentro deste contexto, a presente tese apresenta como objetivo principal a avaliação naturalística de desfechos clínicos e funcionais, associados à avaliação dos níveis séricos de BDNF, em pacientes com SMI. Os pacientes que foram encaminhados para tratamento na Unidade de Internação Psiquiátrica do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre foram incluídos se apresentassem os critérios de SMI: Avaliação Global de Funcionamento (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF) menor ou igual a 50 e tempo de tratamento maior ou igual a dois anos. As avaliações ocorreram em dois momentos (admissão e alta). Compreenderam avaliação sociodemográfica, clínica e coleta de sangue (com dosagem de BDNF sérico). Foram realizadas avaliação diagnóstica pelo Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) e aplicação das escalas Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI-S), GAF e World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref). Ainda, foram aplicadas escalas específicas nos diagnósticos principais (i.e., depressão maior, depressão bipolar, episódio maníaco, esquizofrenia): Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D); Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). O primeiro artigo desta tese descreve os desfechos clínicos, funcionais e também de qualidade de vida durante a internação psiquiátrica. Observou-se melhora significativa nos parâmetros avaliados nos pacientes com SMI como um todo. Os pacientes com episódio maníaco apresentaram maior chance (em relação aos com episódio depressivo) de atingir remissão pela CGI (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03). A duração média da hospitalização (LOS) foi 28,95 (± 19,86) dias. No segundo artigo, observou-se redução dos níveis séricos de BDNF nos pacientes com SMI em relação aos controles saudáveis, independentemente do diagnóstico. Houve aumento significativo no BDNF entre a admissão e a alta. Os resultados apresentados replicam dados previamente publicados a partir de amostra única de pacientes com SMI, sua característica diferencial. Estes resultados reforçam que a internação em UIPHG, uma intervenção relativamente breve, demonstra desfechos positivos e é alternativa bem estabelecida no tratamento da SMI. Além disso, a redução inespecífica do BDNF sérico seguida de um pequeno aumento associado ao tratamento reforçam a possibilidade do BDNF como marcador transdiagnóstico de transtorno mental. / The estimated prevalence of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) according to Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area and National Comorbidity Survey studies is 5.4% in one year. One suggested definition of Severe Mental Illness (SMI) derives from the 1987 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) definition and is based on two criteria: 1. duration, characterized as involving “prolonged illness”, and 2. disability, which includes dangerous or disturbing social behavior, and mild impairment in achieving basic needs. These acute psychiatric conditions may require psychiatric inpatient treatment located in acute wards in General Hospitals. However, little data is currently available evaluating the characteristics and the outcomes during an acute inpatient stay in Brazil. Evidence also suggests that Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are significantly decreased in neuropsychiatric disorders. BDNF is found throughout the brain and is involved in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. So, the main objectives of this work are to evaluate SMI patients’ outcomes during treatment in a psychiatric unit in a general hospital by symptomatology, functionality, quality of life and by the evaluation of BDNF serum levels. After the admission to a psychiatric unit in a general hospital in Brazil, patients were included and if they had two of the SMI criteria: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ≤ 50 and duration of services contact ≥ 2 years. Patients were assessed in admission and upon discharge with Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), GAF, World Health Organization’s QOL Instrument—Short Version (WHOQOL-Bref) and diagnostic specific scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAM-D; Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS; and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-A). Blood samples were also obtained. The first manuscript showed that SMI patients had marked and significant improvements in symptomatic and functional measures during psychiatric hospitalization. Patients with manic episode had higher chance of CGI remission (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.14-14.30; p=0.03) when compared with patients with depressive episode. Mean LOS was 28.95 (± 19.86) days. The second manuscript showed that BDNF serum levels were equally reduced among different SMI diagnoses. Also, the observed improvements in SMI patients were associated with a significant, but small increase in mean serum BDNF levels. Therefore, the results replicate evidence from previous findings in single samples, suggesting that SMI patients can have marked acute improvements during a a relatively short intervention (approximately 1 month) represented by the psychiatric hospitalization in a general tertiary hospital. Also, the similar reduction observed in BDNF levels among SMI patients with different diagnoses and the significant increase but non-restoration indicate that BDNF serum levels could be considered a marker for the presence of an unspecific psychiatric disorder and possibly a transdiagnostic and unspecific marker of disease activity.

Research shows that people with severe mental illness (SMI) have extensive trauma histories and higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than the general population. However, research also shows that both the trauma history and PTSD in people with SMIs are vastly unrecognized and untreated. Additionally, the relationships between SMI, trauma, PTSD, substance use, and other psychosocial factors is still not well understood, as there has been limited experimental research examining these relationships despite an awareness of their connections. The SMI-PTSD descriptive model was originally proposed by Mueser et al. (2002) to better understand these variables, and is often referenced in the literature, yet there is very little empirical evidence and understanding of how this model may differ by gender in people with SMI. Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based treatment for those with SMI, yet the extent to which trauma is addressed within the ACT model is not consistently known, nor how the team’s practitioners work with their clients on trauma-related issues and PTSD. By definition, all ACT clients have an SMI and represent a population with complex and intensive needs; therefore, a better understanding the population ACT serves, as well as how the teams work with the trauma present in their clients, will aid in providing better and more consistent treatment and care. This dissertation examines gender differences in the relationship between SMI, substance use, trauma, PTSD, psychosocial factors, the SMI-PTSD descriptive model, and attempts to ascertain the perspectives of ACT providers in working with trauma and PTSD in clients. In Study 1, I conducted retrospective chart reviews to extract information on trauma histories, PTSD, substance use, and psychosocial factors in 282 clients from four ACT teams (178 men, 104 women) to assess the gender differences in types of trauma, instances of PTSD, substances of choice, problematic substance use, and the SMI-PTSD model. Findings indicate that rates of sexual trauma, emotional abuse, serious suicide attempts, rates of trauma in adulthood, and PTSD are higher among women, whereas rates of alcohol, marijuana, and stimulant use as well as lifetime problematic substance use are higher among men. For the SMI-PTSD model, results suggest that the model better corresponds to the experiences and possible trajectory of men with SMI. In Study 2, I employed thematic analysis through interviewing ACT providers to better understand their perspectives on working with trauma and PTSD in clients. Five overarching themes with 21 sub-themes emerged. The five themes were the role and scope of ACT teams and model regarding trauma; discussions of trauma with clients; current treatment of trauma; barriers to working with trauma; and recommendations for enabling trauma discussions and treatment. These two studies have important implications for further research. Research should take gender identity into consideration when proposing and testing models, as Study 1 has demonstrated that two genders experience a well-accepted proposed model differently; this finding may be applicable to people of all genders, as well as other models. Further research could be done to gather perspectives from workers on the strengths and challenges of the ACT model. Future work should also include the views of ACT clients to get a fuller picture of their experience with receiving care for their trauma experiences. Clinically, health care providers should better recognize and treat PTSD and traumatic-stress symptoms of people with SMI. Doing so will ensure that health-care is moving towards trauma-informed practice on a systemic level.