京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(社会健康医学) / 甲第23822号 / 社医博第122号 / 新制||社医||12(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科社会健康医学系専攻 / (主査)教授 木村 剛, 教授 西浦 博, 教授 長尾 美紀 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Public Health / Kyoto University / DFAM

SUMMARY Aim: To evaluate the quality of life of patients with stable angina pectoris, the decrease of physical load tolerance by them and influence of prevention measures for their quality of life. Methods of the study: The following research methods were used for the study: questioning of patients, interview method, method of document analysis, statistical data processing. The study sample consisted of 93 investigated persons. All investigated persons were divided into two groups: the first group included patients with stable angina pectoris of functional classes III-IV; the second group comprised the investigated with stable angina pectoris of funktional classes I-II (according to the classification of the Canadian Heart Association). Findings: Very limited physical activity was found in 14,6 % of patients of the investigated group, moderately limited in 29,2 %, partially limited in 39,5 %, litlle limited in 12,5 % and unlimited in 4,2% of patients of the investigated group. After receiving findings of the study we could state that physical activity was more or less limited in more than 95 % of patients with AP (of functional slasses III-IV). The number of patients of the compared group distributed in the following way by the abovementioned ranges: very limited physical activity was in case of 11,1% of patients, moderately limited in 40 %, partially limited in 31,1 %, little limited in 11,1 %, unlimited in 6,7 % of patients of the compared groups. After getting to know... [to full text]

INTRODUÇÃO: A proteína C-reativa de alta sensibilidade (PCR-as) é comumente utilizada na prática clínica para avaliar o risco cardiovascular. O seio coronário (SC) é considerado o local ideal para estudos de marcadores inflamatórios e circulação coronária, até o momento. A correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as (valores absolutos) periférico versus (vs.) central ainda não foi feita. Avaliou-se a correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as (mg/L) em veia periférica do antebraço esquerdo (VPAE) vs. SC, em pacientes portadores de doença arterial coronária (DAC) aterosclerótica com diagnóstico de angina estável (AE) ou angina instável (AI). Avaliou-se, também, se os níveis de PCR-as na VPAE e no SC diferem na AE e AI. MÉTODOS e RESULTADOS: 40 pacientes com DAC e estenose >= 70 % do diâmetro da luz vascular em uma das principais artérias coronárias foram incluídos no estudo e classificados em AE (n = 20) e, AI (n = 20). Coletaram-se amostras de sangue simultaneamente na VPAE e no SC, antes da angiografia coronária. A média dos níveis séricos absolutos de PCR-as na VPAE nos pacientes com AE foi de 2,97 ± 2,66, log 0,53 ± 1,24 e, com AI foi de 3,04 ± 3,29, log 0,67 ± 0,94, p = 0,689; e no SC, na AE foi de 2,71 ± 2,46, log 0,46 ± 1,18 e na AI, foi de 2,65 ± 3,08, log 0,41 ± 0,97, p = 0,898 e, portanto, não foram observadas diferenças significativas. A análise de correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as em VPAE vs. SC mostrou uma forte correlação linear tanto para AE (r = 0,993, p < 0,001), para AI (r = 0,976, p < 0,001) e em toda amostra (r = 0,985, p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Os nossos dados sugeriram uma forte correlação linear entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as na VPAE vs. SC na AE e AI; e esses níveis na VPAE e no SC na AE e AI foram semelhantes e não revelaram diferentes influências biológicas / BACKGROUND: The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is commonly used in clinical practice to assess cardiovascular risk. The coronary sinus (CS) is considered the ideal location for studies of inflammatory markers and coronary circulation, until the moment. The correlation between peripheral versus (vs.) central serum levels of hs-CRP (absolute values) has not been done. We evaluated the correlation between serum levels of hs-CRP (mg/L) in the left forearm peripheral vein (LFPV) vs. CS in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diagnosis of stable angina (SA) or unstable angina (UA). We also evaluated whether the hs-CRP levels in LFPV and CS differ in SA and UA. METHODS and RESULTS: 40 patients with CAD and >= 70 % stenosis of the diameter of the vascular lumen in one of the main coronary arteries were included in the study and, classified into SA (n = 20) and, UA (n = 20). Blood samples from in the LFPV and CS were simultaneously collected before coronary angiography. The mean serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV in the patients with SA was 2.97 ± 2.66, log 0.53 ± 1.24 and, in the UA was 3.04 ± 3.29, log 0.67 ± 0.94, p = 0.689. In CS in SA, it was 2.71 ± 2.46, log 0.46 ± 1.18 and in UA it was 2.65 ± 3.08, log 0.41 ± 0.97, p = 0.898; therefore, no significant differences were observed. The correlation analysis between the serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV vs. CS showed a strong linear correlation in both for SA (r = 0.993, p < 0.001), for UA (r = 0.976, p < 0.001) and in the whole sample (r = 0.985, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that in SA as well as in UA there was a strong linear correlation between the serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV vs. CS and, these levels in VPAE and SC in AE and AI were similar and did not reveal different biological influences

Introdução: A quantificação da isquemia miocárdica é um dado de grande auxílio na tomada de decisões clínicas ou intervencionistas no tratamento da doença arterial coronária (DAC) avançada. Dentre os métodos disponíveis para esta finalidade, se destacam a cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM) e a ressonância magnética cardíaca (RMC), que além de fornecerem informações quanto à alteração de motilidade entre o estresse e o repouso, são capazes de analisar a perfusão miocárdica. Neste estudo, investigamos a correlação e a concordância entre esses dois métodos em pacientes com DAC sintomática e avançada. Métodos e Resultados: Cinquenta e três pacientes com DAC avançada (padrão obstrutivo triarterial) não elegíveis para revascularização completa devido à extensão e caráter difuso das lesões foram submetidos à RMC e à CPM. A maioria (57%) apresentava sintomas limitantes (angina CCS 3 ou 4). Na quantificação da carga isquêmica, o percentual de miocárdio isquêmico total (%Mioisquêmico) foi significativamente maior na RMC do que na CPM (25,3±13,7% vs. 20,5±13,5%, respectivamente; P = 0,02). A RMC identificou baixa carga isquêmica em apenas 15% dos pacientes, enquanto pela CPM 53% dos pacientes foram assim classificados. Foram encontradas correlações fracas entre os métodos para o %Miofixo, no %Mioestresse e %Mioisquêmico (coeficiente de Spearman variando de 0,06 a 0,54), assim como uma fraca concordância (kappa de 0,11 e bias elavado de 9,3 para %Mioisquêmico). De um total de 159 territórios coronarianos, 18 (11%) apresentaram grandes discordâncias (%Mioisquêmico pela CPM < 10% e > 20% pela RMC) em regiões do ventrículo esquerdo com alta probabilidade pré-teste de possuírem isquemia importante (miocárdio viável em território irrigado por artéria coronária ocluída cronicamente). Conclusão: A quantificação da carga isquêmica estresse-induzida avaliada pela CPM e pela RMC possui fraca correlação e concordância em pacientes com DAC avançada e complexa, com a RMC demonstrando uma maior carga isquêmica do ventrículo esquerdo, principalmente nas regiões com infarto prévio / Introduction: The quantification of myocardial ischemia is a key element in the decision-making process in patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD). Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are non-invasive tools for myocardial perfusion assessment. We investigated the correlation and agreement between these two methods in patients with symptomatic and complex CAD. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients with advanced CAD (multivessel obstructive disease) not eligible for complete revascularization due the extension and diffuseness of the disease underwent both CMR and SPECT. The majority (57%) presented limiting symptoms (angina CCS 3 or 4). The quantification of the ischemic burden revealed that the mean percentage of total ischemic myocardium (%Myoischemic) was significantly higher as assessed by CMR compared with by SPECT (25.3±13.7% vs. 20.5±13.5%, respectively; P = 0.02). There were no significant correlations between CMR and SPECT regarding %Myostress (r = 0.23, p = 0.09), fixed (r = 0.20, p = 0.14), or ischemic (r = 0.11, p = 0.44). While SPECT classified 28 patients (53%) as having low ischemic burden (%Myoischemic < 10%), CMR classified only 8 patients (15%) in this category. Poor correlations between the two methods were found for %Myostress, %Myoischemic, and %Myofixed (Spearman\'s rho ranging from 0.06 to 0.54), depicting also slight agreement (kappa of 0.11 and bias as high as 9.3% for %Myoischemic). On a per-segment-based analysis, 18 coronary territories (11%) of the total 159, presented highly disagreements (%Myoischemic by SPECT < 10% and > 20% by CMR) in LV regions likely to have severe ischemia (viable myocardium supplied by chronically occluded vessels. Conclusion: The quantification of inducible myocardial ischemia by SPECT and CMR disagrees in patients with advanced and complex CAD, with CMR displaying greater left ventricular ischemic burden, particularly in patients with a previous myocardial infarction

The initial treatment options for patients with stable coronary artery disease include optimal medical therapy alone, or coronary revascularization with optimal medical therapy. The most common revascularization modality is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either bare metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES). PCI is believed to reduce recurrent angina and thereby decrease the need for additional procedures compared to optimal medical therapy alone. It remains unclear if these benefits are sufficient to offset the increased costs and small increase in adverse events associated with PCI. The objectives of this thesis were to determine the degree of angina relief afforded by PCI and develop a tool to provide contemporary estimates of the impact of angina on quality of life. In addition, we sought to develop a comprehensive state-transition model, calibrated to real world costs and outcomes to compare the cost-effectiveness of initial medical therapy versus PCI with either BMS or DES in patients with stable coronary artery disease. ii We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the published literature. Although PCI was associated with an overall benefit on angina relief (odds ratio [OR] 1.69; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.24-2.30), this benefit was largely attenuated in contemporary studies (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.76-1.68). Our meta-regression analysis suggests that this observation was related to greater use of evidence-based medications in more recent trials. Using simple linear regression, we were able to create a mapping tool that could accurately estimate utility weights from data on the Seattle Angina Question, the most common descriptive quality of life instrument used in the cardiovascular literature. In our economic evaluation, we found that an initial strategy of PCI with a BMS was cost- effective compared to medical therapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $13,271 per quality adjusted life year gained. In contrast, DES had a greater cost and lower survival than BMS and was therefore a dominated strategy.

The initial treatment options for patients with stable coronary artery disease include optimal medical therapy alone, or coronary revascularization with optimal medical therapy. The most common revascularization modality is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either bare metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES). PCI is believed to reduce recurrent angina and thereby decrease the need for additional procedures compared to optimal medical therapy alone. It remains unclear if these benefits are sufficient to offset the increased costs and small increase in adverse events associated with PCI. The objectives of this thesis were to determine the degree of angina relief afforded by PCI and develop a tool to provide contemporary estimates of the impact of angina on quality of life. In addition, we sought to develop a comprehensive state-transition model, calibrated to real world costs and outcomes to compare the cost-effectiveness of initial medical therapy versus PCI with either BMS or DES in patients with stable coronary artery disease. ii We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the published literature. Although PCI was associated with an overall benefit on angina relief (odds ratio [OR] 1.69; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.24-2.30), this benefit was largely attenuated in contemporary studies (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.76-1.68). Our meta-regression analysis suggests that this observation was related to greater use of evidence-based medications in more recent trials. Using simple linear regression, we were able to create a mapping tool that could accurately estimate utility weights from data on the Seattle Angina Question, the most common descriptive quality of life instrument used in the cardiovascular literature. In our economic evaluation, we found that an initial strategy of PCI with a BMS was cost- effective compared to medical therapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $13,271 per quality adjusted life year gained. In contrast, DES had a greater cost and lower survival than BMS and was therefore a dominated strategy.

Introdução: A quantificação da isquemia miocárdica é um dado de grande auxílio na tomada de decisões clínicas ou intervencionistas no tratamento da doença arterial coronária (DAC) avançada. Dentre os métodos disponíveis para esta finalidade, se destacam a cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM) e a ressonância magnética cardíaca (RMC), que além de fornecerem informações quanto à alteração de motilidade entre o estresse e o repouso, são capazes de analisar a perfusão miocárdica. Neste estudo, investigamos a correlação e a concordância entre esses dois métodos em pacientes com DAC sintomática e avançada. Métodos e Resultados: Cinquenta e três pacientes com DAC avançada (padrão obstrutivo triarterial) não elegíveis para revascularização completa devido à extensão e caráter difuso das lesões foram submetidos à RMC e à CPM. A maioria (57%) apresentava sintomas limitantes (angina CCS 3 ou 4). Na quantificação da carga isquêmica, o percentual de miocárdio isquêmico total (%Mioisquêmico) foi significativamente maior na RMC do que na CPM (25,3±13,7% vs. 20,5±13,5%, respectivamente; P = 0,02). A RMC identificou baixa carga isquêmica em apenas 15% dos pacientes, enquanto pela CPM 53% dos pacientes foram assim classificados. Foram encontradas correlações fracas entre os métodos para o %Miofixo, no %Mioestresse e %Mioisquêmico (coeficiente de Spearman variando de 0,06 a 0,54), assim como uma fraca concordância (kappa de 0,11 e bias elavado de 9,3 para %Mioisquêmico). De um total de 159 territórios coronarianos, 18 (11%) apresentaram grandes discordâncias (%Mioisquêmico pela CPM < 10% e > 20% pela RMC) em regiões do ventrículo esquerdo com alta probabilidade pré-teste de possuírem isquemia importante (miocárdio viável em território irrigado por artéria coronária ocluída cronicamente). Conclusão: A quantificação da carga isquêmica estresse-induzida avaliada pela CPM e pela RMC possui fraca correlação e concordância em pacientes com DAC avançada e complexa, com a RMC demonstrando uma maior carga isquêmica do ventrículo esquerdo, principalmente nas regiões com infarto prévio / Introduction: The quantification of myocardial ischemia is a key element in the decision-making process in patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD). Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are non-invasive tools for myocardial perfusion assessment. We investigated the correlation and agreement between these two methods in patients with symptomatic and complex CAD. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients with advanced CAD (multivessel obstructive disease) not eligible for complete revascularization due the extension and diffuseness of the disease underwent both CMR and SPECT. The majority (57%) presented limiting symptoms (angina CCS 3 or 4). The quantification of the ischemic burden revealed that the mean percentage of total ischemic myocardium (%Myoischemic) was significantly higher as assessed by CMR compared with by SPECT (25.3±13.7% vs. 20.5±13.5%, respectively; P = 0.02). There were no significant correlations between CMR and SPECT regarding %Myostress (r = 0.23, p = 0.09), fixed (r = 0.20, p = 0.14), or ischemic (r = 0.11, p = 0.44). While SPECT classified 28 patients (53%) as having low ischemic burden (%Myoischemic < 10%), CMR classified only 8 patients (15%) in this category. Poor correlations between the two methods were found for %Myostress, %Myoischemic, and %Myofixed (Spearman\'s rho ranging from 0.06 to 0.54), depicting also slight agreement (kappa of 0.11 and bias as high as 9.3% for %Myoischemic). On a per-segment-based analysis, 18 coronary territories (11%) of the total 159, presented highly disagreements (%Myoischemic by SPECT < 10% and > 20% by CMR) in LV regions likely to have severe ischemia (viable myocardium supplied by chronically occluded vessels. Conclusion: The quantification of inducible myocardial ischemia by SPECT and CMR disagrees in patients with advanced and complex CAD, with CMR displaying greater left ventricular ischemic burden, particularly in patients with a previous myocardial infarction

INTRODUÇÃO: A proteína C-reativa de alta sensibilidade (PCR-as) é comumente utilizada na prática clínica para avaliar o risco cardiovascular. O seio coronário (SC) é considerado o local ideal para estudos de marcadores inflamatórios e circulação coronária, até o momento. A correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as (valores absolutos) periférico versus (vs.) central ainda não foi feita. Avaliou-se a correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as (mg/L) em veia periférica do antebraço esquerdo (VPAE) vs. SC, em pacientes portadores de doença arterial coronária (DAC) aterosclerótica com diagnóstico de angina estável (AE) ou angina instável (AI). Avaliou-se, também, se os níveis de PCR-as na VPAE e no SC diferem na AE e AI. MÉTODOS e RESULTADOS: 40 pacientes com DAC e estenose >= 70 % do diâmetro da luz vascular em uma das principais artérias coronárias foram incluídos no estudo e classificados em AE (n = 20) e, AI (n = 20). Coletaram-se amostras de sangue simultaneamente na VPAE e no SC, antes da angiografia coronária. A média dos níveis séricos absolutos de PCR-as na VPAE nos pacientes com AE foi de 2,97 ± 2,66, log 0,53 ± 1,24 e, com AI foi de 3,04 ± 3,29, log 0,67 ± 0,94, p = 0,689; e no SC, na AE foi de 2,71 ± 2,46, log 0,46 ± 1,18 e na AI, foi de 2,65 ± 3,08, log 0,41 ± 0,97, p = 0,898 e, portanto, não foram observadas diferenças significativas. A análise de correlação entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as em VPAE vs. SC mostrou uma forte correlação linear tanto para AE (r = 0,993, p < 0,001), para AI (r = 0,976, p < 0,001) e em toda amostra (r = 0,985, p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Os nossos dados sugeriram uma forte correlação linear entre os níveis séricos de PCR-as na VPAE vs. SC na AE e AI; e esses níveis na VPAE e no SC na AE e AI foram semelhantes e não revelaram diferentes influências biológicas / BACKGROUND: The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is commonly used in clinical practice to assess cardiovascular risk. The coronary sinus (CS) is considered the ideal location for studies of inflammatory markers and coronary circulation, until the moment. The correlation between peripheral versus (vs.) central serum levels of hs-CRP (absolute values) has not been done. We evaluated the correlation between serum levels of hs-CRP (mg/L) in the left forearm peripheral vein (LFPV) vs. CS in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diagnosis of stable angina (SA) or unstable angina (UA). We also evaluated whether the hs-CRP levels in LFPV and CS differ in SA and UA. METHODS and RESULTS: 40 patients with CAD and >= 70 % stenosis of the diameter of the vascular lumen in one of the main coronary arteries were included in the study and, classified into SA (n = 20) and, UA (n = 20). Blood samples from in the LFPV and CS were simultaneously collected before coronary angiography. The mean serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV in the patients with SA was 2.97 ± 2.66, log 0.53 ± 1.24 and, in the UA was 3.04 ± 3.29, log 0.67 ± 0.94, p = 0.689. In CS in SA, it was 2.71 ± 2.46, log 0.46 ± 1.18 and in UA it was 2.65 ± 3.08, log 0.41 ± 0.97, p = 0.898; therefore, no significant differences were observed. The correlation analysis between the serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV vs. CS showed a strong linear correlation in both for SA (r = 0.993, p < 0.001), for UA (r = 0.976, p < 0.001) and in the whole sample (r = 0.985, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that in SA as well as in UA there was a strong linear correlation between the serum levels of hs-CRP in LFPV vs. CS and, these levels in VPAE and SC in AE and AI were similar and did not reveal different biological influences