Orientador: Martha Rosa Pisani Destro / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-11T13:38:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Batista_GustavoAraujo_D.pdf: 1579436 bytes, checksum: cddc80f045bbe9d4440dbf238f7eff50 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Resumo : Este trabalho é uma síntese feita a partir de uma pesquisa bibliográfica de filosofia comparada da educação, desenvolvida sobre dois tipos de pensamento pedagógico, elaborados, respectivamente, por John Locke (1632-1704) e por Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778); nessa pesquisa faz-se uma leitura de suas propostas pedagógicas à luz teórico-metodológica do materialismo histórico-dialético. Procurou-se contextualizar historicamente os dois autores abordados, com o intuito de demonstrar em que medida as rupturas e as permanências geradas pelas contradições nas infraestruturas econômicas das sociedades de suas respectivas épocas interferiram nas superestruturas políticas, filosóficas, intelectuais, religiosas e pedagógicas e, conseqüentemente, em suas trajetórias existenciais e em suas obras. Dividindo-se em três capítulos, no primeiro discorre-se sobre a contextualização histórica dos dois filósofos estudados, passando-se em revista os Séculos XVII e XVIII em seus vários aspectos, assim como nele se faz uma descrição acerca das biografias e das personalidades desses autores; no segundo incumbe-se de abordar os pensamentos lockeano e rousseauniano como um todo, ressaltando-se as principais categorias pelas quais seus autores estruturam e articulam as suas idéias acerca do conhecimento, da política, da religião e da tolerância; no terceiro aborda-se algumas categorias pedagógicas desses pensamentos, as quais, comparadas entre si, têm o intuito de aclarar as convergências entre os seus dois autores, ao mesmo tempo em que se procura ressaltar a influência que este recebe daquele em se tratando de constituir o seu pensamento pedagógico; também nesse capítulo são explicitadas as visões de mundo e de homem nas quais esses autores enquadrar-se-iam, assim como são tratadas outras categorias que permitem vincular os seus pensamentos não apenas entre si, mas sim às classes sociais para as quais suas obras constituem significado / Abstract : This work is a synthesis done from a bibliographical research of compared philosophy of education, developed about two kinds of pedagogical thinking, done, respectively, by John Locke (1632-1704) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778); in that research one does a reading of their pedagogical proposals by the theoretical-methodological light of the historical-dialectical materialism. One looked for doing historically a context about the two authors approached, with the aim of showing in what measure the ruptures and the permanencies produced by the contradictions in the economical infrastructure of the societies of their respective eras interfered into the political, philosophical, intellectual, religious and pedagogical superstructures and, consequently, into their existential trajectories and into their works. Being divided into three chapters, in the first one discusses about the historical context of the two philosophers studied, passing on review the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries in their several aspects, as well as in this it is done a description concerning the biographies and personalities of those authors; in the second one undertakes to approach the lockean and rousseaunian thoughts at all, standing out the main categories by which their authors structure and articulate their ideas concerning knowledge, politics, religion and toleration; in the third one approaches some pedagogical categories of those thoughts, that, compared to one another, have the aim of clearing the convergences between their two authors, at the same time on which one looks for standing out the influence that this receives from that in regarding of constructing his pedagogical thinking; also in this chapter are made explicit the visions of world and man into which those two authors would be fitted, as well as are treated others categories that permit to link their thoughts not only each other, but so to the social classes to which their works make meaning / Doutorado / Historia, Filosofia e Educação / Doutor em Educação

Abstract This study examines German educational philosopher Otto Friedrich Bollnow’s (1903–1991) existential-hermeneutic theory of discontinuous forms of education, unstetige formen der Erziehung. At the core of this theory is a view of human being subjected to education that appears disruptive and critical, influencing the development of disclosing the true powers of a person and unfolding of truths about oneself that could not be uncovered otherwise. Typically, this theory has been interpreted on the continuum of hermeneutic philosophy, as hermeneutic pedagogy with an extension of Martin Heidegger’s fundamental ontology, antisubjectivism and especially his theory of truth as unconcealment. According to this line of interpretation, Bollnow’s project brings an existential addition to classical pedagogical theories, as a level of appealing pedagogy. According to this existentialist view, education in a strict sense cannot really take place: it could not affect the true core of a person, nor this person could be subjected under any pedagogical influence in any meaningful way. The only task left for education is to appeal to the conscience of an already autonomous person. However, in this study it is claimed that this line of interpretation falls short to the fact that Bollnow’s philosophy of education builds heavily on his overall philosophical-anthropological project, which springs from Kant’s first critique and especially, as shown in this work, from Edmund Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. The study shows, that Bollnow’s discontinuous forms of education are not resulted from hermeneutic educational reality, with an extension of existential potentiality to authenticity of a person. In fact, one could not derive such a view from mere hermeneutics. Instead, what Bollnow’s structural view of educational reality indicates, is that it should be understood as a phenomenological description of a priori categorical structures. It is claimed in the work, that the discontinuous forms are the products of phenomenological reduction. They are derived from the direct experience within consciousness, from the essence of what is experienced, from the very nature of what is it like to be in a process of becoming human. From this perspective, from the subject-point, education cannot be described as a paradox of freedom and restriction between educator and educatee, nor transmission of culture between generations, but instead could be described as the subjective experience of being educated or educating oneself, disclosing oneself to oneself, which is constituted only by the necessary conditions of these subjective experiences of discontinuity. / Tiivistelmä Tämä tutkielma tarkastelee saksalaisen kasvatusfilosofi Otto Friedrich Bollnowin eksistentiaali-hermeneuttista teoriaa kasvatuksen epäjatkuvista muodoista, unstetige formen der Erziehung. Tämän teorian ytimessä on näkemys ihmisestä altistettuna kasvatukselle joka näyttäytyy katkonaisena ja kriittisenä, vaikuttaen yksilön todellisten kykyjen ja itseä koskevien totuuksien paljastumiseen. Tyypillisesti tämä teoria on tulkittu hermeneuttisen filosofian jatkumolle, hermeneuttiseksi pedagogiikaksi jossa yhdistyy piirteitä Martin Heideggerin fundamentaaliontologiasta, antisubjektivismista sekä erityisesti teoriasta totuudesta paljastumisena. Tämän tulkintalinjan mukaisesti Bollnowin projekti tuo eksistentiaalisen lisän perinteisiin pedagogisiin teorioihin vetoamisen pedagogiikan tasona. Tähän eksistentialistiseen näkemykseen liittyen, kasvatus sen tiukassa mielessä ei ole mahdollista: se ei voisi vaikuttaa yksilön todelliseen ytimeen, eikä tämä yksilö voisi olla kasvatuksen kohteena millään mielekkäällä tavalla. Kasvatuksen ainoaksi tehtäväksi jää vetoaminen jo valmiiksi autonomisen yksilön omaantuntoon. Kuitenkin, tässä tutkimuksessa esitetään että tämä tulkintalinja epäonnistuu jättäessään huomiotta Bollnowin kasvatusfilosofian rakentumisen hänen filosofis-pedagogisen antropologian kokonaisprojektinsa pohjalta. Tämä projekti kumpuaa Kantin ensimmäisestä kritiikistä ja erityisesti, kuten tässä työssä osoitetaan, Edmund Husserlin transsendentaalista fenomenologiasta. Tämä tutkimus osoittaa, ettei Bollnowin epäjatkuvan kasvatuksen muodot pohjaudu hermeneuttiselle kasvatustodellisuudelle, jota on jatkettu yksilön eksistentiaalisen autenttisuuden mahdollisuuden ajatuksella. Itse asiassa, kyseistä teoriaa ei voisi johtaa hermeneutiikasta. Sen sijaan, Bollnowin kasvatustodellisuuden tasorakenne indikoi tulkintatapaa, jossa se nähdään a prioristen kategoriarakenteiden fenomenologisena kuvauksena. Työssä väitetään, että epäjatkuvat muodot ovat fenomenologisen reduktion tuotetta. Ne on johdettu tietoisuuden sisällöistä, välittömistä kokemuksista, niiden olemuksesta, toisin sanoen, sen luonteesta miltä tuntuu olla ihmiseksi tulemisen prosessissa. Tästä yksilönäkökulmasta käsin kasvatusta ei voida kuvailla vapauden ja pakon välisenä ristiriitana eikä kulttuurin välittämisenä sukupolvelta toiselle, vaan sen sijaan sarjana subjektiivisia katkonaisuuden kokemuksia kasvatetuksi tulemisesta ja itsekasvatuksesta, jossa yksilö paljastaa itseään itselleen. Tämä näkemys kasvatuksesta konstituoituu subjektiivisten kokemusten välttämättömyysehtojen kautta.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-26T18:49:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WAGNER_CAETANO_DISSERTACAO_08_12_2010.pdf: 247736 bytes, checksum: a77cea9fa019f598329d39fd6cfa1b6f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-09-02 / O presente trabalho apresenta uma abordagem teórica sobre a inserção da Filosofia na grade curricular do Ensino Fundamental. Para tanto, realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico sobre a importância da filosofia na construção do conhecimento significativo, assim como algumas de suas peculiaridades quanto ao tema Ensino e Aprendizagem. O problema motivador é a análise de um material didático que apresenta-se como um novo paradigma, pois propõe-se a ensinar filosofia para crianças sob a justificativa de que esta será o fundamento e facilitadora de todo tipo de conhecimento a ser adquirido posteriormente. O criador deste material é o filósofo norte-americano Matthew Lipman, e seu material é intitulado Filosofia para Crianças Educação para o Pensar. A análise realizada nos primeiros livros didáticos de Lipman, direcionados às séries iniciais, tem uma pretensão: identificar se sua literatura, material didático, é dialético ou dialógico. Com a finalidade de alcançar os objetivos propostos a essa pesquisa realizamos um estudo histórico-conceitual sobre a dialética, estabelecendo sua relação direta com a questão do ensino. As inferências desta análise encontram-se nos subtítulos finais deste trabalho, onde realizamos as discussões que aproximam o material didático analisado das metodologias dialética e dialógica, optando por uma destas como sendo predominante no mesmo material. Como conclusão, este trabalho identificou que o material didático de Lipman é mais próximo da metodologia dialógica - conversação que é acompanhada por princípios da coerência lógica -, do que dialética - conversação caracterizada pela contraposição de idéias, embora em alguns momentos ambas se completam, como, por exemplo, na práxis do Programa de Lipman.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-18T17:54:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WAGNER_CAETANO_DISSERTACAO_08_12_2010.pdf: 247736 bytes, checksum: a77cea9fa019f598329d39fd6cfa1b6f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-09-02 / O presente trabalho apresenta uma abordagem teórica sobre a inserção da Filosofia na grade curricular do Ensino Fundamental. Para tanto, realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico sobre a importância da filosofia na construção do conhecimento significativo, assim como algumas de suas peculiaridades quanto ao tema Ensino e Aprendizagem. O problema motivador é a análise de um material didático que apresenta-se como um novo paradigma, pois propõe-se a ensinar filosofia para crianças sob a justificativa de que esta será o fundamento e facilitadora de todo tipo de conhecimento a ser adquirido posteriormente. O criador deste material é o filósofo norte-americano Matthew Lipman, e seu material é intitulado Filosofia para Crianças Educação para o Pensar. A análise realizada nos primeiros livros didáticos de Lipman, direcionados às séries iniciais, tem uma pretensão: identificar se sua literatura, material didático, é dialético ou dialógico. Com a finalidade de alcançar os objetivos propostos a essa pesquisa realizamos um estudo histórico-conceitual sobre a dialética, estabelecendo sua relação direta com a questão do ensino. As inferências desta análise encontram-se nos subtítulos finais deste trabalho, onde realizamos as discussões que aproximam o material didático analisado das metodologias dialética e dialógica, optando por uma destas como sendo predominante no mesmo material. Como conclusão, este trabalho identificou que o material didático de Lipman é mais próximo da metodologia dialógica - conversação que é acompanhada por princípios da coerência lógica -, do que dialética - conversação caracterizada pela contraposição de idéias, embora em alguns momentos ambas se completam, como, por exemplo, na práxis do Programa de Lipman.

This thesis "The Cosmological Education by E. Fink" represents modified and extended text of the publication (2018), which was the result of the grant project GA UK. Through commented translations of the excerpts of Fink's books, parts of his diaries, unpublished notes from his written inheritance, stored in the University archive in Freiburg, this thesis aims to bring new perspective and to provoke discussion about his cosmological philosophy as a possible way of the future social self-development in the nihilistic era. The cosmological philosophy of education shows Fink, the best former student and assistant of the founder of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, in a quite surprising light - as a radical thinker of Nietzsche's philosophical and educational legacy. Fink knowingly departs from husserlian phenomenology, what is closer described here in the additional chapter dedicated to the problem of technique, science and work. The method of the research intuitively seeks and critically reflects Fink's own way of thinking about the problem of education, which is inseparable from his constant dialogue with the history of philosophy, necessity of the revaluation of the metaphysical bounds and consecutive understanding of a man as ens cosmologicum, what reflects also the structure of the thesis. KEYWORDS...

Today's early childhood programs are required to have high-quality inclusive classrooms that serve preschool children with disabilities and diverse needs employed by highly-qualified early childhood teachers. The problem of this study was to describe the current status of pre-service teachers' perspectives of their own teacher self-efficacy, philosophical beliefs, and epistemological beliefs for inclusive practices in an early childhood classroom at the conclusion of an introductory early childhood education course. The study also looked at differences by certification track- EC-6 bilingual (n = 5), EC-6 generalist (n = 8), EC-6 ESL (n = 12), and all-level SpEd (n = 7). The participants (n = 32) were a convenient sample in an Introductory to Early Childhood Education course at a Texas university. Three post-course assignments (i.e. the final self-evaluation, the post-course philosophy of education, and the post-course successful early childhood inclusive teacher drawing) were given to students in an introductory early childhood course and were subjected to content analysis and thematic analysis. The TEIP survey was used as a framework for content analysis. The group-as-a-whole, the EC-6 bilingual, the EC-6 generalists, the all-level SpEd, and the EC-6 ESL certification track participants' teacher self-efficacy perspectives content showed high teacher self-efficacious comments in regards to "classroom environment and student expectations." The all-level SpEd certification track participants' data showed high high teacher self-efficacious comments similar to the group-as-a-whole, with additional comments focused on "providing an alternative explanation or example when students are confused," and "improving the learning of a student who is failing." The group-as-a-whole philosophical perspectives focused on "safety" (in the classroom), "parent involvement," "building relationships with students and parents," "student success," and "classroom environment." EC-6 bilingual certification participants' philosophical perspectives primarily focused on "student success" and "instructional strategies." All-level SpEd certification participants focused on "parent involvement" and "classroom environment." EC-6 generalists certification participants' philosophical perspectives focused on "classroom environment," "community of learners," "parent involvement," and "collaboration with other educators." EC-6 ESL certification track participants' philosophical perspectives focused on "parent communication/parent-teacher communication" and "student success." The group-as-a-whole and all certification track epistemological perspectives focused on (a) "monitor and adjust," (b) "know your students," (c) "awareness," (d) "caring" (about your students), and (e) "teacher character traits needed." The one exception was the EC-6 generalists and all-level SpEd certification track participants adding the focus of "teaching strategies/strategies" and "informal assessments" respectively. The findings revealed that the participants' own experiences, past and present teacher models, respected individuals, and enacted course curriculum(s) influenced their teacher self-efficacy, philosophical, and epistemological perspectives. Implications from this study include adding (a) a focus on education laws and policies to the introductory early childhood course to provide a broader understanding about inclusion, (b) more enacted curriculum to include application to theory to encourage research-based/best practices in future classrooms, and (c) using a mind shift from "what is the disability" to "what is the ability" in more wholistic teacher preparation courses versus silo-track teacher preparation courses.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Master of Arts / Department of Modern Languages / Douglas Benson / The purpose of this report is to demonstrate mastery of content in the Spanish MA program in Second Language Acquisition at Kansas State University. After graduation from this program, I plan to pursue a career as a high school Spanish teacher. As evidence of content mastery, this report contains my philosophy of education, which emphasizes communicative competence in the Spanish classroom. I discuss best teaching practices in presenting and practicing Spanish vocabulary and grammar with students. The use of the target language and the integration of culture and the four language skills is designed to further my students’ development through the progression of the lesson plan, from warm-up, to input, to the activity sequence, to closure. This report also contains a rationale, or how my philosophy of education directly and specifically applies to my teaching, for a unit plan including daily lessons and related appendices on the subject of the Spanish Civil War, and outlines student learning outcomes for this unit, such as the ability to compare their home culture to the culture of the second language as well as the ability to relate art and literature to the events of the war. The topic of my unit plan is of particular interest to my students and me as wars and violence are a present reality in our world. The secondary focus of my unit plan involves the significant detrimental effects of the Spanish Civil War and well as its specific consequences in the lives of women and children.