Dans le domaine des sciences cognitives, la plupart des études sur la communication humaine se sont intéressées à la manière dont on comprend la communication et non pas à la manière dont on l’évalue. D’après le cadre théorique de la vigilance épistémique (Sperber et al., 2010) les êtres humains disposent d’un ensemble de mécanismes dédiés à l’évaluation des messages qui servent à se protéger d’informations potentiellement trompeuses et qui permettent de communiquer de manière fluide et relativement honnête. D’après ce cadre théorique, le raisonnement aurait évolué pour permettre une discrimination plus fine des messages. La principale fonction du raisonnement serait argumentative : il s’agirait de trouver des arguments pour convaincre les autres et d’évaluer les arguments d’autrui afin d’acquérir des croyances plus solides (Mercier & Sperber, 2011). Si le raisonnement est le résultat d’une adaptation, ces compétences devraient être relativement universelles et on ne devrait pas avoir à les enseigner. L’universalité et le développement précoce de ces compétences permettraient donc de montrer qu’elles ne reposent pas sur un apprentissage culturel spécifique. Cependant, la plupart des études sur le raisonnement et l’argumentation chez les adultes comme chez les enfants, et par conséquent les principaux résultats qui soutiennent la théorie argumentative du raisonnement, se limitent à un échantillon restreint des sociétés humaines : les cultures occidentales. Aussi, on pourrait penser que ces caractéristiques du raisonnement sont davantage l’expression de facteurs culturels plutôt que des traits universaux. Ce travail de thèse s’intéresse à cette question en déployant une approche interculturelle (en comparant les sociétés occidentales, orientales et traditionnelles) et développementale. Les cultures traditionnelles et orientales diffèrent des cultures occidentales sur de multiples aspects - tels que la tradition philosophique, l’approche parentale ou l’accès à l’éducation formelle - qui sont particulièrement pertinents pour tester ces prédictions adaptatives. Le rôle de la discussion a souvent été sous-estimé dans le domaine du raisonnement, à l’exception de certaines études développementales très influentes (Doise & Mugny, 1984; Perret-Clermont, 1980). En coupant le raisonnement de son contexte argumentatif, les psychologues du raisonnement l’ont privé de l’une de ses forces : l’échange d’arguments avec les autres. Dans une première étude, nous avons montré que dans une population traditionnelle – les Mayas indigènes du Guatemala – la discussion en groupe amène à de meilleures performances que le raisonnement individuel. De tels résultats avaient déjà été rapportés pour des populations occidentales et orientales. Deux caractéristiques du raisonnement peuvent expliquer ces résultats : the biais vers son côté, qui empêche les individus d’améliorer leurs performances individuelles, et l’habilité à évaluer les arguments des autres, qui permettent aux individus de bénéficier des discussions de groupes (Article 1). Dans trois études exploratoires, nous avons apporté des preuves que le bénéfice de l’argumentation peut aussi s’étendre au raisonnement moral. La première étude confirme que les arguments peuvent faire changer les individus d’avis même dans des jugements moraux impliquant une forte charge émotionnelle. En revanche, les seconde et troisième études n’ont pas permis de révéler des effets notables de la discussion sur les jugements moraux (Chapitre 2). Avant l’âge de trois ans, les enfants échangent des arguments avec leurs parents et leurs frères et sœurs. Cependant, aucune expérience n’a montré que les enfants de cet âge sont sensibles à la qualité des arguments. Dans une première étude, nous fournissons des preuves expérimentales que les enfants de deux ans sont sensibles à la force des arguments (Article 3)... / Within cognitive science, most studies of communication have focused on how we understand communication and not on how we evaluate it. According to the epistemic vigilance framework (Sperber et al., 2011) a set of mechanisms would be devoted to evaluating other people's messages to protect us from potentially misleading information, allowing communication to work smoothly and to remain mostly honest. In this framework, reasoning would have evolved to allow for a finer grained discrimination of messages. The main function of reasoning would be argumentative: to find reasons in order to convince others, and to evaluate others' reasons in order to adopt better supported beliefs (Mercier & Sperber, 2011).If reasoning is an evolved adaptation, these skills should be relatively universal and they should not have to be taught. Universality and early development is suggestive of skills that do not rest on specific cultural learning. However, most of the studies on reasoning and argumentation, either with adults or children, and consequently the main results supporting the argumentative theory of reasoning, are limited to a small range of human societies: Western cultures. One can argue that the features of reasoning might be the expression of specific cultural factors rather than universals traits. The present thesis addresses this question by deploying a cross-cultural (comparing Western, Eastern, and traditional societies) and a developmental approach. Traditional and Eastern cultures differ from Western cultures in dimensions such as philosophical tradition, parenting styles, or access to formal education that are particularly relevant to test these adaptive predictions.The role of discussion has been often underestimated in the field of reasoning, with the exception of some influential developmental research (Doise & Mugny, 1984; Perret-Clermont, 1980). Cutting reasoning from its argumentative contexts, psychologists of reasoning deprived it from one of its strength, the exchange of arguments with others. In a first study we showed that, as reported in Western and Eastern populations, group discussion yields better performance than individual reasoning in a traditional population – indigenous Maya from Guatemala. Two features of reasoning can account for this improvement: the myside bias, which precludes individuals from improving their performance on their own, and the ability to soundly evaluate others’ arguments, which allows individuals to benefit from group discussions (Article 1). In three exploratory studies we brought some evidence that the benefit of argumentation could be extended to moral judgments. The first one confirms that arguments can make people change their mind even on some emotionally charged moral judgments. By contrast, the second and the third ones failed to reveal consistent effects of discussion on moral judgments (Chapter 2).Before the age of three, children exchange arguments with their parents and siblings, but no experiment has demonstrated that they are sensitive to argument quality. In a first study we provide experimental evidence that 2-year-olds are sensitive to argument strength (Article 3). However, these skills might have been fostered by the particular cultural context of Western middle- and upper-class families, to which most children studied belong. No experimental data had been gathered in Eastern or traditional societies. A series of experiments first revealed that, as reported in Western culture, Mayan (Article 4) and Japanese (Article 7) children can discriminate between a strong (perceptual) argument and a weak (circular) argument. Second, Mayan (Article 4) and Western (Article 5) children are shown to follow the testimony of a dominant over that of a subordinate while Japanese participants favor the testimony of the subordinate (Article 8). ...

(in English) Thesis is focused on issues of cannibalism as an almost universal cultural construct, which we can find across all the world cultures.Particularly it focuses on imaginary man- eating creatures in international folklore and mythology. The work constitutes of four parts. First part is introduction of theoretical-methodological conceptual background, second part forms author's own typological classification of anthropophagi based on materials accessed from universal folklore indexes . Third part is short probing questionnaire research concentrated on a specific type of anthropophagi - boogeyman. The last part, conclusion, summarizes gathered data and provides possibilities of future research. The objective of this work is comprehensive classification of anthropophagus beings according to their type. Based on this classification it is possible to track occurrences of anthropophagi in contemporary folk narratives documented in actual oral transmission and compare it with international parallels.

This thesis is focused on testing the so-called unique items hypothesis on Czech language data. Supposed Czech unique items were chosen from lexical units, word-formation phenomena, syntactic structures and language use phenomena. Their frequency in a comparable monolingual corpus of contemporary Czech was established and the differences in frequency were statistically tested. This quantitative research was accompanied by a qualitative probe into the English source texts from which sentences containing selected unique items were translated using an aligned parallel corpus of English-Czech translations. The results reveal a general tendency of unique items to be underrepresented in translated language and a variety of source- language phenomena that underlie unique items usage in the target language.

No description available.

Si nos théories physiques peuvent décrire les traits les plus généraux de la réalité, on sait aussi que pour le faire, elles utilisent le langage des mathématiques. On peut alors légitimement se demander si notre capacité à décrire, sinon la nature intime des objets et phénomènes physiques, du moins les relations et structures qu’ils instancient, ne vient pas de cette application des mathématiques. Dans cette thèse, nous soutenons que les mathématiques sont si efficacement applicables en physique tout simplement parce que la réalité décrite par les physiciens est de nature quantitative. Pour cela, nous proposons d’abord une ontologie des quantités, puis des lois de la nature, qui s’inscrit dans les débats contemporains sur la nature des propriétés (théorie des universaux, théorie des tropes, ou nominalisme), et des lois (régularités, ou relations entre universaux). Ensuite, nous examinons deux sortes d’application des mathématiques : la mathématisation des phénomènes par la mesure, puis la formulation mathématique des équations reliant des grandeurs physiques. Nous montrons alors que les propriétés et les lois doivent être comme notre ontologie les décrit, pour que les mathématiques soient légitimement, et si efficacement, applicables. L’intérêt de ce travail est d’articuler des discussions purement ontologiques (et très anciennes, comme la querelle des universaux) avec des exigences épistémologiques rigoureuses qui émanent de la physique actuelle. Cette articulation est conçue de manière transcendantale, car la nature quantitative de la réalité (des propriétés et des lois) y est défendue comme condition d’applicabilité des mathématiques en physique. / Assuming that our best physical theories succeed in describing the most general features of reality, one can only be struck by the effectiveness of mathematics in physics, and wonder whether our ability to describe, if not the very nature of physical entities, at least their relations and the fundamental structures they enter, does not result from applying mathematics. In this dissertation, we claim that mathematical theories are so effectively applicable in physics merely because physical reality is of quantitative nature. We begin by displaying and supporting an ontology of quantities and laws of nature, in the context of current philosophical debates on the nature of properties (universals, classes of tropes, or even nominalistic resemblance classes) and of laws (as mere regularities or as relations among universals). Then we consider two main ways mathematics are applied: first, the way measurement mathematizes physical phenomena, second, the way mathematical concepts are used to formulate equations linking physical quantities. Our reasoning has eventually a transcendental flavor: properties and laws of nature must be as described by the ontology we first support with purely a priori arguments, if mathematical theories are to be legitimately and so effectively applied in measurements and equations. What could make this work valuable is its attempt to link purely ontological (and often very ancient) discussions with rigorous epistemological requirements of modern and contemporary physics. The quantitative nature of being (properties and laws) is thus supported on a transcendental basis: as a necessary condition for mathematics to be legitimately applicable in physics.

This master's thesis focuses on the research of similar video game experiences among players of different cultures. Because video games are a product of the worldwide gaming industry, the same content is available for players of various cultural backgrounds, who can then share their experiences via internet forums. In a cross-cultural comparison, the thesis examines similarities in gaming experiences the players of different cultural backgrounds have, and thus exploring the potential of videogames to overcome national borders and to bring players closer. Because four generations of gamers had already got the opportunity to play videogames, the thesis also focuses on similar gaming experiences across the age groups, and thus potentially bringing together also players of different ages. The theoretical basis of this thesis is built on the works of theorists of play Johan Huizinga, Vladimír Borecký, and Roger Caillois, theories of anthropologists George P. Murdock, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, Michal Tošner, and Clifford Geertz, and lastly, the history of video games as a medium along with the history of computers in general as described by Lev Manovich. The research itself was conducted by using two methods. An online survey, shared among respondents by using the Snowball Sampling method, followed by a...

Meaning has been established pervasively as a central concept throughout disciplines that were involved in cognitive revolution. Its metaphoric usage comes to be, first and foremost, through the interpreter’s constraint: representational relationships and contents are considered to be in the “eye” or mind of the observer and shared properties among observers themselves are knowable through interlinguistic phenomena, such as translation. Despite the instability of meaning in relation to its underdetermination by reference, it can be a tertium comparationis or “third comparator” for extended human cognition if gauged through invariants that exist in transfer processes such as translation, as all languages and cultures are rooted in pan-human experience and, thus, share and express species-specific ontology. Meaning, seen as a cognitive competence, does not stop outside of the body but extends, depends, and partners with other agents and the environment. A novel approach for exploring the transfer properties of some constituent items of the original natural semantic metalanguage in English, that is, semantic primitives, is presented: FrameNet’s semantic frames, evoked by the primes SEE and FEEL, were extracted from EuroParl, a parallel corpus that allows for the automatic word alignment of items with their synonyms. Large Ontology Multilingual Extraction was used. Afterward, following the Semantic Mirrors Method, a procedure that consists back-translating into source language, a translatological examination of translated and original versions of items was performed. A fully automated pipeline was designed and tested, with the purpose of exploring associated frame shifts and, thus, beginning a research agenda on their alleged universality as linguistic features of translation, which will be complemented with and contrasted against further massive feedback through a citizen science approach, as well as cognitive and neurophysiological examinations. Additionally, an embodied account of frame semantics is proposed.

This study examines the translation of hyphenated compounds from English to Swedish in a non-fiction text about fashion. The translation is performed by the author of this study, which is important to keep in mind. The aim is to evaluate the structure and function of hyphenated compounds and analyze if and what changes occur in the translation process. The quantitative analysis demonstrates that the majority of the hyphenated compounds function as adjectives in the source text, and the most frequent left-hand elements are adjectives and nouns, while the most frequent right-hand elements are nouns and -ed participles. An overview of the translation equivalents in the target text reveals compound participles, compound adjectives, and prepositional phrases as the most common structural categories. The qualitative analysis illustrates how general methods like transposition, modulation, and literal translations are necessary in order to produce appropriate translations. Furthermore, translation universals, especially in the form of explicitation and simplification, prove to be prominent strategies when translating hyphenated compounds. Explicitation is particularly evident when hyphenated compounds are rendered as postmodifying prepositional phrases, clauses, and noun phrases, while simplification is especially notable in the category of simple adjectives. In addition, a noteworthy finding that stands out compared to previous studies is how some hyphenated compounds are kept in their hyphenated form when translated, which appears to correlate with the genre of fashion writing.

Ce mémoire propose une étude critique des chapitres 14 à 17 de la première partie de la Summa logicae de Guillaume d’Ockham (v. 1285-1347), philosophe et théologien du bas Moyen-Âge. Ces quatre chapitres présentent la position d’Ockham dans la querelle des universaux, débat intellectuel marqué qui a opposé plusieurs écoles de pensée du milieu universitaire médiéval. Pour sa part, Ockham défend une position nominaliste selon laquelle 1. tout ce qui existe est de soi singulier; et 2. les universaux, ces concepts uniquement accessibles par l’esprit, n’existent pas. S’opposant au réalisme, Ockham s’y adresse notamment à l’un de ses collègues franciscain, Jean Duns Scot (v. 1266-1308). Ce mémoire a pour objectif d’identifier d’abord les mérites de la position nominaliste face au réalisme quant au statut des universaux et à la philosophie du langage et ensuite les tensions internes au nominalisme ockhamiste lorsque nous tentons de concilier celui-ci à l’ontologie et à la théologie catholique. Il s’agira donc de montrer que l’antiréalisme parvient à défaire le réalisme dans une perspective logique, mais que certains problèmes demeurent lorsque nous l’analysons dans une perspective ontologique ou théologique. Mots-clés : Guillaume d’Ockham, philosophie médiévale, Moyen-Âge, universaux, Jean Duns Scot, scolastique, ontologie, théologie catholique, logique, sémantique / This thesis proposes a critical study of chapters 14 to 17 of the first part of William of Ockham’s Summa logicae, a philosopher and theologian of the late Middle Ages (c. 1285-1347). These four chapters present Ockham's position in the problem of universals, a marked intellectual debate that opposed several philosophical and theological schools of the medieval academic world. For his part, Ockham defends a nominalist position according to which 1. everything that exists is inherently singular; and 2. universals, those concepts only accessible to the mind, do not exist. Opposing realism, Ockham addresses one of his Franciscan colleagues in particular, John Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308). This thesis’s first aim is to identify the merits of a nominalist position vis-à-vis realism in regard to the status of universals, and second, to mark the tensions internal to Ockham’s nominalistic approach in its conciliation with ontology and catholic theology. It will thus be shown that antirealism succeeds in defeating realism from a logical perspective, but that some problems remain when we analyse it from an ontological or theological perspective. Keywords: William of Ockham, medieval philosophy, Middle Ages, universals, John Duns Scotus, scholastic, ontology, catholic theology, logic, semantics.

In the world of Descriptive Translation Studies, translationese refers to the specific traits that characterise the language used in translations. While translationese has been often investigated to illustrate that translational language is different from non-translational language, scholars have also proposed a set of hypotheses which may characterise such di erences. In the quest for the validation of these hypotheses, embracing corpus-based techniques had a well-known impact in the domain, leading to several advances in the past twenty years. Despite extensive research, however, there are no universally recognised characteristics of translational language, nor universally recognised patterns likely to occur within translational language. This thesis addresses these issues, with a less used approach in the eld of Descriptive Translation Studies, by investigating the nature of translational language from a machine learning perspective. While the main focus is on analysing translationese, this thesis investigates two related sub-hypotheses: simplication and explicitation. To this end, a multilingual learning framework is designed and implemented for the identification of translational language. The framework is modelled as a categorisation task, the learning techniques having the major goal to automatically learn to distinguish between translated and non-translated texts. The second and third major goals of this research are the retrieval of the recurring patterns that are revealed in the process of solving the task of categorisation, as well as the ranking of the most in uential characteristics used to accomplish the learning task. These aims are ful lled by implementing a system that adopts the machine learning methodology proposed in this research. The learning framework proves to be an adaptable multilingual framework for the investigation of the nature of translational language, its adaptability being illustrated in this thesis by applying it to the investigation of two languages: Spanish and Romanian. In this thesis, di erent research scenarios and learning models are experimented with in order to assess to what extent translated texts can be diff erentiated from non-translated texts in certain contexts. The findings show that machine learning algorithms, aggregating a large set of potentially discriminative characteristics for translational language, are able to diff erentiate translated texts from non-translated ones with high scores. The evaluation experiments report performance values such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure on two datasets. The present research is situated at the con uence of three areas, more precisely: Descriptive Translation Studies, Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing, justifying the need to combine these elds for the investigation of translationese and translational hypotheses.