Text in Afrikaans / Die private persoon het sekere bevoegdhede betreffende die arrestasie en die gebruik van geweld tydens arrestasie van lede van die publiek wat misdade pleeg/gepleeg het. Hierdie bevoegdheid spruit uit sowel die gemenereg as die wettereg. Kragtens die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafproseswet word hierdie bevoegdhede gereel deur aa 42 en 49. Oewerbewoners as eienaars van grand is geregtig op die onverstoorde gebruik en genot van hulle eiendom. Daarteenoor is kanovaarders ook daarop geregtig om op openbare ri vi ere vir wedvaarte te oefen. Di t is egter belangrik om vas te stel of die portage van kano's op die oewer insidenteel is tot die reg om op die rivier te vaar. Ewewig moet bewerkstellig word tussen die botsende belange. Die Waterwet 54 van 1956 behoort gewysig en vereenvoudig te word, aangesien Suid-Afrika nie slegs op die RomeinsHollandse reg kan staatmaak nie - ons waterprobleme staan direk teenoor die van die Nederlande. / The private person has certain powers regarding the arrest and the use of force to effect the arrest of members of the public who have committed/are committing offences. These powers are derived from either common law or statutory law. In terms of the South African Criminal Procedure Act these powers are regulated by ss 42 and 49. Riparian owners are entitled to the undisturbed use and enjoyment of their property. On the other hand, canoeists are also entitled to practise on public rivers. It is important, however, to ascertain whether portage of canoes on the river bank is incidental to the right of canoeing on the river. A balance should be struck between these conflicting interests. The Water Act 54 of 1956 should be amended and simplified, since South Africa cannot rely on Roman Dutch law alone - our water problems are the complete opposite of those in the Netherlands. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Straf- en Strafprosesreg)

The paradigm shift in water quality management of South African water resources was based on current international trends. This significant move was from a previous emphasis on source management to a focus on finding a balance between water resource protection and water use. The current approach requires that water quality and quantity should be maintained for sustainable functioning of both the natural aquatic environment and socioeconomic development. This approach has placed the assessment of water quality status as a key decision tool in water quality management. Various assessment tools have been utilized to quantify the quality of South African water resources. In this study we assessed the compatibility of some of the methodologies that have been used in the Department of Water Affairs to determine and report on the water quality status of the resource. During the assessment the context and manner in which these methodologies can be utilized in water quality management were also addressed The Compliance Evaluation and Fitness for use categorization methodologies are both used to describe the water quality threshold of potential concern when dealing with the resource. Compliance Evaluation methodology uses a pass or fail assessment, while the Fitness for use categorization methodology uses a scaled approach allowing for the assessment of gradual change in the system. The out puts of these two methodologies, the Resource Water Quality Objectives and Fitness for use categories/ classes have both been used in the department as benchmarks to describe the current water quality status The assessment of the two methodologies indicated that there are similarities in the approaches and the principles behind the two processes. The observation of the results, however, indicated differences in the manner of presentation of the results, the interpretation of the outcome and in how water quality management measures that needs to be implemented are linked. Both methodologies are easy to apply when conducting water quality status assessments. However, the two methodologies are not sufficient on their own when making decisions on water quality management. It was concluded that although the compliance evaluation methodology can play a pivotal role when setting end of pipe standards, the process needs to consider the gradual changes of water quality in the river system in order to enable instigation of different water quality management measures at appropriate levels. Further it was recommended that with some modification the two approaches can be applied to assess water quality to support adequate water quality management decisions at various levels. / Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / gm2014 / Animal and Wildlife Sciences / Unrestricted

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

In the United States, over 90 contaminants in community water supplies (CWS) are regulated based on maximum contaminant limits (MCLs) set by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act. These limits are crucial to the health of over 90% of the US population who rely on CWS for their drinking water. Despite advancements in safer water, questions remain about the potential role of prolonged exposures to contaminants at sub-regulatory levels in chronic diseases. Historically, conducting epidemiologic studies of drinking water exposures in the United States has been challenging due to the fragmented availability of CWS service areas and contaminant information, which varies depending on each state’s efforts. This dissertation attempts to overcome some of these barriers by collaborating with long-standing institutes in California to evaluate the relationship between drinking water contaminants (arsenic, uranium, and trihalomethanes) and the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a large prospective cohort. The California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort is comprised of over 130,000 women living across the state and followed for health outcomes, including CVD and CKD, since enrollment (1995-1996). The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard and Assessment (OEHHA) houses some of the most detailed information about CWS available in the United States. With their partnership, we consolidated three decades (1990-2020) worth of yearly contaminant data from CWS. Thanks to a statewide effort that gathered service boundary data from local agencies, we were able to identify CWS serving participants’ residential addresses. Ultimately, these efforts produced new drinking water exposure data available in the CTS cohort, accessible for the analyses of associated health outcomes. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the novel contributions and methods of this dissertation, and background knowledge about the three common drinking water contaminants under study—arsenic, uranium, and trihalomethanes. The three epidemiologic studies included in this dissertation were designed to evaluate the relationship between these contaminants and health outcomes, selected based on previous toxicologic evidence. To this end, we detail current knowledge on the relationships between a) arsenic and CVD, b) uranium and arsenic and CKD, and c) trihalomethanes and CKD. Chapter 2 details our efforts to construct residential histories of CTS participants using address data collected throughout follow-up (1995-2018). Environmental epidemiologic studies using geospatial data often estimate exposure at a participant’s residence upon enrollment, but mobility during the exposure period can lead to misclassification. We aimed to mitigate this issue using address records that have been self-reported and collected from the US Postal Service, LexisNexis, Experian, and California Cancer Registry. We identified records of the same address based on geo-coordinate distance (≤250m) and street name similarity. We consolidated addresses, prioritizing those confirmed by participants during follow-up questionnaires, and estimating the duration lived at each address using dates associated with records (e.g., date-first-seen). During 23-years of follow-up, about half of participants moved (48%, including 14% out-of-state). We observed greater mobility among younger women, Hispanic or Latina women, and those in metropolitan and lower socioeconomic status areas. The cumulative proportion of in-state movers remaining eligible for analysis was 21%, 32%, and 41% at 5-, 10-, and 20-years post-enrollment, respectively. Using self-reported information collected 10 years after enrollment, we correctly identified 94% of self-identified movers and 95% of non-movers as having moved or not moved from their enrollment address. This dataset provides a foundation for estimating long-term exposure to drinking water contaminants evaluated in this dissertation, and supports other epidemiologic studies of diverse environmental exposures and health outcomes in this cohort. Chapter 3 details our first epidemiologic analysis evaluating the relationship between long-term arsenic exposure from CWS and CVD risk in the CTS cohort. Inorganic arsenic in drinking water is linked to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. However, risk is uncertain at lower levels present in CWS, currently regulated at the federal maximum contaminant level of 10µg/L. Using statewide healthcare administrative records from enrollment through follow-up (1995-2018), we identified fatal and nonfatal cases of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and CVD (including stroke). Participants’ residential addresses were linked to a network of CWS boundaries and annual arsenic concentrations (1990-2020). Most participants resided in areas served by a CWS (92%). Exposure was calculated as a time-varying, 10-year moving average up to a participant’s event, death, or end of follow-up. Using multivariable-adjusted Cox models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for the risk of IHD or CVD. We evaluated arsenic exposure categorized by concentration thresholds relevant to regulation standards (<1.00, 1.00-2.99, 3.00-4.99, 5.00-9.99, ≥10µg/L) and continuously using a log2-transformation (i.e., per doubling). We also stratified analyses by age, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. This analysis included 98,250 participants, 6,119 IHD cases and 9,936 CVD cases. The HRs for IHD at concentration thresholds (ref:<1µg/L) were 1.06 (95%CI=1.00-1.12) at 1.00-2.99µg/L, 1.05 (95%CI=0.94-1.17) at 3.00-4.99µg/L, 1.20 (95%CI=1.02-1.41) at 5.00-9.99µg/L, and 1.42 (95%CI=1.10-1.84) at ≥10µg/L. HRs for every doubling of wAs exposure were 1.04 (95%CI=1.02-1.06) for IHD and 1.02 (95%CI=1.01-1.04) for CVD. We observed statistically stronger risk among those ≤55 versus >55 years at enrollment (pinteraction=0.006 and 0.012 for IHD and CVD, respectively). This study demonstrates that long-term arsenic exposure from CWS, at and below the regulatory limit, may increase cardiovascular disease risk, particularly IHD. Chapter 4 details our second epidemiologic analysis evaluating uranium and arsenic from CWS and CKD risk in the CTS cohort. Metals/metalloids in drinking water, including uranium and arsenic, have been linked to adverse kidney effects and may contribute to CKD risk, but few epidemiologic studies exist. Annual average concentrations of uranium and arsenic were obtained for CWS serving participants’ residential address(es). We calculated participant’s average exposure from enrollment in 1995 to 2005. CKD cases were ascertained from inpatient hospitalization records beginning in 2005, once diagnostic coding was adopted, through 2018. Our analysis included 6,185 moderate to end stage CKD cases among 88,185 women. We evaluated exposure categorized by concentration thresholds relevant to regulatory standards, up to ½ the current regulatory limit (uranium=15µg/L; arsenic=5µg/L), and continuously on the log scale per interquartile range (IQR). We used mixed-effect multivariable-adjusted Cox models to estimate HRs and 95%CIs of CKD by uranium or arsenic levels. We also conducted analyses stratified by risk factors and comorbidities. Exposures at the 50th (25th, 75th) percentiles were 3.1 (0.9, 5.6) µg/L for uranium, and 1.0 (0.6, 1.8) µg/L for arsenic. Higher uranium exposure, relative to <2µg/L, was associated with CKD risk, with HRs of 1.20 (95%CI=1.07-1.35) at 2.0-<5.0µg/L, 1.08 (95%CI=0.95-1.22) at 5.0-<10µg/L, 1.33 (95%CI=1.15, 1.54) at 10-<15µg/L, and 1.32 (95%CI=1.09-1.58) at ≥15µg/L (ptrend=0.024). We found no overall association between arsenic and CKD (log IQR; HR=1.02, 95%CI=0.98-1.07). However, risk from arsenic was statistically different by age and comorbidity status, with risk only observed among younger individuals (≤55 years), and those who developed cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Uranium exposure from drinking water below the current regulatory limit may increase CKD risk. Relatively low, chronic exposure to arsenic may affect kidney function among those with comorbidities. Chapter 5 details our third and final epidemiologic analysis evaluating trihalomethanes in residential CWS and CKD risk in the CTS cohort. Disinfection byproducts from water chlorination, including trihalomethanes (THMs), have been associated with bladder cancer and adverse birth outcomes. Despite mechanistic evidence of nephrotoxic effects, especially brominated THMs, no epidemiologic studies to date have evaluated CKD risk. This study included 89,158 women with 6,232 moderate to end stage CKD cases identified from statewide healthcare administrative records (2005-2018). Average concentrations of four THMs, including three brominated THMs, were calculated for CWS serving participants’ residential addresses from 1995-2005. We estimated HRs and 95%CIs using mixed-effect multivariable-adjusted Cox models. A g-computation mixture analysis approach was used to estimate the overall effect and relative contribution of brominated THMs, chloroform (non-brominated THM), as well as uranium and arsenic—other potentially nephrotoxic metals in CWS previously evaluated. Median (25th, 75th, 95th percentiles) were 5.5 (0.5, 24.1, 57.8) µg/L for total THMs and 2.7 (0.6, 11.3, 30.0) µg/L for brominated THMs. In flexible exposure-response models, we observed a positive relationship between total THMs and CKD risk, which was stronger for brominated THMs. The HRs (95%CIs) of CKD risk from brominated THMs at the highest two exposure categories (75th-94th, ≥95th, versus <25th) were 1.23 (1.13-1.33) and 1.43 (1.23-1.66), respectively; ptrend<0.001. Brominated THMs were the largest contributor (53%) to the overall mixture effect on CKD risk, followed by uranium (35%), arsenic (6%), and chloroform (5%). Trihalomethanes in water, in particular brominated trihalomethanes which are not regulated separately, may contribute to CKD development, even at levels below the current US regulatory limit (80µg/L). Chapter 6 concludes this dissertation by summarizing our findings, highlighting the policy implications, relevance to other populations, and discussing future directions. Recently, the US EPA has released a geospatial dataset of CWS boundaries across the country that can be used in conjunction with national contaminant data. This development underscores the growing recognition for more research on drinking water quality and health. We hope that the methods developed and used in our analyses will be informative to future studies, and that there will be opportunities for replication of our findings to better inform policy and protect the health of populations nationwide.

The Water Resources Management Act 24 of 2004 will change the water regime in Namibia dramatically. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act provides for this change by excluding private ownership of water from the new water law dispensation. This study focused on section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act and the implication that this section will have on property rights in the Namibia. The dissertation firstly outlines the historical development of ownership of water in Namibia. It is indicated that private ownership of water was an established principle under Roman-Dutch law. A further examination of Roman-Dutch law reveals that surface water could be divided into private and public water. Public water belonged to the whole nation, while ownership of private rivers was vested in the land owner. Under South West Africa’s water legislation, the Irrigation and Water Conservation Act 8 of 1912 and the Water Act 54 of 1956 maintained the distinction between public and private water. However, the Water Act of 1956 expanded the definitions of both public and private water, and acknowledged that the land owner where the water found its source or flowed over, could exercise the exclusive use rights of such water. The Water Resources Management Act has been approved and published in the Government Gazette. However, it has not yet come into force as a date for commencement of the Act, as prescribed by section 138(1)(b), has not yet been determined by the Minister. Once the Act is in force, the Water Act will be repealed as a whole. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act will abolish the private ownership of water in Namibia. This is clearly in violation of article 16 of the Namibian Constitution of 1990, which provides for private ownership of water when read with article 100. Therefore, the research concludes that the Water Resources Management Act will dramatically affect property rights in Namibia. Under the Water Resources Management Act there will be no private ownership of water, and the affected person will have no recourse under the Act to claim compensation. / LLM (Environmental Law and Governance), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

The Water Resources Management Act 24 of 2004 will change the water regime in Namibia dramatically. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act provides for this change by excluding private ownership of water from the new water law dispensation. This study focused on section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act and the implication that this section will have on property rights in the Namibia. The dissertation firstly outlines the historical development of ownership of water in Namibia. It is indicated that private ownership of water was an established principle under Roman-Dutch law. A further examination of Roman-Dutch law reveals that surface water could be divided into private and public water. Public water belonged to the whole nation, while ownership of private rivers was vested in the land owner. Under South West Africa’s water legislation, the Irrigation and Water Conservation Act 8 of 1912 and the Water Act 54 of 1956 maintained the distinction between public and private water. However, the Water Act of 1956 expanded the definitions of both public and private water, and acknowledged that the land owner where the water found its source or flowed over, could exercise the exclusive use rights of such water. The Water Resources Management Act has been approved and published in the Government Gazette. However, it has not yet come into force as a date for commencement of the Act, as prescribed by section 138(1)(b), has not yet been determined by the Minister. Once the Act is in force, the Water Act will be repealed as a whole. Section 4 of the Water Resources Management Act will abolish the private ownership of water in Namibia. This is clearly in violation of article 16 of the Namibian Constitution of 1990, which provides for private ownership of water when read with article 100. Therefore, the research concludes that the Water Resources Management Act will dramatically affect property rights in Namibia. Under the Water Resources Management Act there will be no private ownership of water, and the affected person will have no recourse under the Act to claim compensation. / LLM (Environmental Law and Governance), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

This PhD thesis, after a brief introductory historical exposé of water use (not only) in our territory and related sources of law focuses on decision making and processes in water use in contemporary Czech legislation. The topic is divided into three blocks, relating to integrated water management procedures, a general measure of water law and other acts pursuant to the Water Act. The introduction precedes the chapter on system of water authorities, which are crucially involved in the exercise of state administration under the Water Act. PhD thesis points to the split competence of the four central ministries (agriculture, environment, transport, defense) as a central water authorities and the other "residual" powers of municipal authorities of municipalities with extended powers as water authorities. The chapter on water management offices is also engaged in the scope of municipal and regional authorities and military domains office, as well as the recently canceled water authorities in charge of municipal authorities. The water management is the administrative proceedings on matters within the Water Act. Administrative bodies (mostly water authorities) there follow the Administrative Code, or in the case of water works and water management arrangements of the Building Act, if the Water Act, which...

Legal aspects of water retention in the landscape Abstract This diploma thesis deals with the legal aspects of water retention in the landscape in response to the current problems associated with impaired landscape retention capacity such as drought, erosion or floods. The author first outlines the factual and legal context of the issue, which is followed by an analysis of conceptual, administrative-legal and economic instruments of the Czech legal order that can improve water retention capabilities of the landscape. The diploma thesis analyses the relevant instruments of the Water Act, Forest Act, Act on the protection of agricultural land or Act on protection of nature and landscape. Consequently, it deals with the role of land-use planning, land consolidation and environmental impact assessment for the issue. The thesis includes comprehensive evaluation of the relevant legal regulation in terms of its effectiveness and possible proposals de lege ferenda.