In this comparative examination of cinematic representations of American and Brazilian wildernesses, I argue for the necessity of a transnational, postregional, and ecocritical approach to film studies. The way that the deserts of the American West are represented by Hollywood Western filmmakers reveal underlying ecological and political philosophies, and provide a productive contrast with representations of the sertão, a similarly arid biome in Brazil. Among other theoretical approaches, this study uses W. J. T. Mitchell’s idea of “landscape” as a verb to examine the formal devices by which filmmakers and audiences “landscape” these “wildernesses.” Using John Ford’s The Searchers (1956) as an example, I suggest that Hollywood Westerns inscribe the land with a colonial gaze that reflects and perpetuates a dualistic conception of nature, one that sees nature as separate and distinct from humankind. Cinema Novo, the radical anticolonial movement in Brazilian cinema, provides an aesthetic and philosophical alternative. Through an analysis of one of Cinema Novo’s foundational works by one of its founding figures—Glauber Rocha’s Deus e o diabo na terra do sol [Black God, White Devil] (1964)—I demonstrate how the theory and practice of Rocha’s anticolonial “aesthetic of hunger” has an ecological dimension, one that rejects and collapses a binary opposition between humans and nature. By looking beyond borders which too often function not only as national boundaries but to delimit fields of academic study, this project finds common ground for comparison in representations of nature, and demonstrates the political and ecological implications thereof.

Notre mémoire se penche sur un corpus de films spécifique; il s’agit des westerns américains racontant la construction d’un chemin de fer. Nous traitons ces films comme un sous-genre du western que nous intitulons Railroad Building Story. Est proposé dans notre étude que la structure narrative étant à la base de tous les récits du sous-genre provient d’une idéalisation des faits historiques entourant la construction du premier chemin de fer transcontinental aux États-Unis. Dans le premier chapitre, nous présentons une adaptation de la méthode d’analyse de Vladimir Propp, telle que présentée dans la Morphologie du conte, dans le but d’identifier la structure narrative stable des films du corpus et d’en décrire les unités narratives constantes. L’application de la méthode est effectuée dans le second chapitre, où chacune des unités narratives constantes est expliquée. De plus, nous confrontons ces unités narratives à l’histoire du chemin de fer transcontinental afin d’analyser les rapports idéologiques existant entre ces récits fictionnels et leur référent historique. Cette description sémionarrative et historique de la Railroad Building Story met en évidence sa fonction idéologique permanente en tant que mythe cinématographique du chemin de fer américain. Dans le troisième chapitre, les films sont analysés d’après leur contexte sociohistorique de production. Le chapitre est divisé selon les quatre périodes historiques dans lesquels les films du sous-genre furent réalisés, soit les années 1920, la Grande Dépression, l’ère maccarthyste et le début des années 1960. En analysant les films d’après une approche sociocritique, nous démontrons comment ceux-ci traduisent des préoccupations idéologiques liées au climat social de la nation américaine. Nous expliquons donc comment le mythe du chemin de fer américain se voit réapproprié à chaque période historique, et ce, afin de répondre aux exigences idéologiques contemporaines à la production des films de la Railroad Building Story. / This master’s thesis takes a close look at a very specific corpus of films; the westerns that narrate the construction of a railroad. We treat these movies as a sub-genre of the western that we call the Railroad Building Story. Our study proposes that the narrative structure at the basis of all the sub-genre’s stories comes from an idealization of the historical facts surrounding the construction of the first American transcontinental railroad. In the first chapter, we present an adaptation of Vladimir Propp’s method of analysis, as found in his Morphology of the Folktale, in order to identify the stable narrative structure of our corpus and to describe its constant narrative units. The application of said method takes place in the second chapter, in which each constant narrative unit is thoroughly explained. We also confront these narrative units in the history of the transcontinental railroad as to analyze the ideological relations existing between these fictional narratives and their historical referent. This semionarrative and historical description of the Railroad Building Story highlights its permanent ideological function as the cinematographic myth of the American railroad. In our third chapter, we analyze the films in the light of their sociohistorical context of production. The chapter is divided between the four historical periods in which these movies were produced, that to say the 1920’s, the Great Depression, the mcccarthyism era and the early 1960’s. By analyzing these films with a sociocritical stance, we demonstrate how they express ideological concerns linked to the social climate of the American nation. Thus we explain how the American railroad myth is being reappropriated in each historical period in order to address the ideological exigencies that are contemporary to the production of the Railroad Building Story’s films.

No description available.

Boris Akunin’s historical detective novels have sold more than eight million copies in Russia, and have been translated into nearly a dozen languages. Boris Akunin is the pen name of literary critic and translator Grigory Chkhartishvili. Born in 1956 in the republic of Georgia, he published his first detective stories in 1998. His first series of novels, beginning with Azazel’ and followed by Turetskii gambit, feature a dashing young police inspector, Erast Fandorin. Fandorin’s adventures take place in the Russian Empire of the late nineteenth century, and he regularly finds himself at the center of key historic events. The first book takes place over one summer, May to September 1876, as the intrepid Fandorin, on his first case, unveils an international organization of conspirators—Azazel’—bent on changing the course of world events. The second takes place two years later from July 1877 to March 1878 during Russia’s war with the Ottoman Empire. The young detective again clashes with Azazel’, as he unravels a Turkish agent’s intricate plan to weaken and destroy the Russian state. Both adventures have proven wildly popular and entertaining, while maintaining a certain literary value. The exploration of time and space in Russian literature was once a popular subject of discourse, but since the 1970s it has been somewhat ignored, rarely applied to contemporary works, and even less to works of popular culture. Akunin’s treatment of time and space, however, especially given the historical setting of his works, is unique. Azazel’, for example, maintains a lightning pace with a tight chronology and a rapidly changing series of locales. Turetskii gambit presents a more laconic pace, and, though set in the vast Caucasus region, seems more claustrophobic as it methodically works towards its conclusion. Both works employ a seemingly impersonal narrator, who, nonetheless, speaks in a distinctly 19th century tone, and both works cast their adventures within the framework of actual historical events and locations. This thesis analyzes core theories in literary time and space, applying them then to Akunin’s historical detective literature.

Boris Akunin’s historical detective novels have sold more than eight million copies in Russia, and have been translated into nearly a dozen languages. Boris Akunin is the pen name of literary critic and translator Grigory Chkhartishvili. Born in 1956 in the republic of Georgia, he published his first detective stories in 1998. His first series of novels, beginning with Azazel’ and followed by Turetskii gambit, feature a dashing young police inspector, Erast Fandorin. Fandorin’s adventures take place in the Russian Empire of the late nineteenth century, and he regularly finds himself at the center of key historic events. The first book takes place over one summer, May to September 1876, as the intrepid Fandorin, on his first case, unveils an international organization of conspirators—Azazel’—bent on changing the course of world events. The second takes place two years later from July 1877 to March 1878 during Russia’s war with the Ottoman Empire. The young detective again clashes with Azazel’, as he unravels a Turkish agent’s intricate plan to weaken and destroy the Russian state. Both adventures have proven wildly popular and entertaining, while maintaining a certain literary value. The exploration of time and space in Russian literature was once a popular subject of discourse, but since the 1970s it has been somewhat ignored, rarely applied to contemporary works, and even less to works of popular culture. Akunin’s treatment of time and space, however, especially given the historical setting of his works, is unique. Azazel’, for example, maintains a lightning pace with a tight chronology and a rapidly changing series of locales. Turetskii gambit presents a more laconic pace, and, though set in the vast Caucasus region, seems more claustrophobic as it methodically works towards its conclusion. Both works employ a seemingly impersonal narrator, who, nonetheless, speaks in a distinctly 19th century tone, and both works cast their adventures within the framework of actual historical events and locations. This thesis analyzes core theories in literary time and space, applying them then to Akunin’s historical detective literature.

No description available.

No description available.