Orientador: Suzi Frankl Sperber / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Institutos de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-03T23:09:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Oliveira_Silvana_D.pdf: 476830 bytes, checksum: bba38cc07d3366ce1e3cd84fa5eeb6eb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003 / Resumo: A proposta deste trabalho consiste em apresentar e operacionalizar a categoria do terceiro estado como ferramenta de reflexão para a análise de textos representativos da obra de João Guimarães Rosa. Ao considerar a narrativa numa perspectiva tradicional, tenho que o conflito proposto inicialmente como motor do enredo configura-se como o primeiro estado, enquanto a solução do conflito dentro da expectativa criada pelo primeiro estado resultaria no que eu chamarei de segundo estado. Ainda quando o aspecto da composição da narrativa se configura como motor do conflito, num arco metalingüístico, julgo possível acionar as referências a primeiro e segundo estados. Assim, o terceiro estado compõem com o primeiro e o segundo um triângulo circular, a partir do qual o conflito inicial se desestabiliza de tal forma que a solução/desfecho é re-alocada, ou seja, há uma subversão de expectativa e, na forma e no conteúdo, o texto presentifica o conflito. Nessa perspectiva, retomo as considerações de Gilles Deleuze sobre o rizoma e o dualismo atual/virtual, compreendendo que o terceiro estado se apresenta como uma solução rizomática, pois ele implica uma liberação de devires, o que acaba por subverter certas linhas duras, estabelecendo picadas (veredas) inéditas, imprevisíveis, capazes de reverter a expectativa que o enredo possa construir em princípio. Em paralelo às reflexões sobre os conceitos de rizoma e atual/virtual, procuro relacionar o terceiro estado à tradição do fantástico a partir do caráter reflexivo que as narrativas fantásticas propõem ao confrontarem a personagem com um fenômeno que não é passível de domínio a partir, somente, de uma ação racional. Na referência ao fantástico tradicional interessa, sobretudo, a idéia de encontro fantástico, ou seja, o que se dá entre a personagem e o fenômeno e possibilita o acontecimento no conto. Da mesma forma, interessa dizer o limite do discurso fantástico em relação à obra de Guimarães Rosa, uma vez que a referência imediata daquele discurso é o mundo racional, mesmo que numa perspectiva de negação. Tal oposição não se verifica na obra de Guimarães Rosa, uma vez que aí não é possível pensar numa relação polarizada com a razão, mas sim na configuração de um mundo ficcional em que a razão já é um efeito de subversão, pois não funciona como fundamento ou base para as narrativas. Nas narrativas fantásticas, o encontro entre o fenômeno e a personagem resulta, de ambos os lados, a um devir-outro, de modo que o elemento estranho e irracional vem a ser como que parte da personagem e, mais tarde, no desenlace, como que parte do mundo a que elas pertencem. Se nas narrativas fantásticas tradicionais, o fenômeno consiste num elemento perturbador de dimensões ameaçadoras e potencialmente destrutivas, cabendo à personagem subverter essa determinação, em Guimarães Rosa, o elemento - terceiro estado - que se insere de modo a alterar a lógica da experiência da personagem no mundo tem caráter intensamente rizomático, pois não começa nem conclui, ele se encontra sempre no meio, entre as coisas, inter-ser, intermezzo (DELEUZE & GUATTARRI, 1995, p. 37). O terceiro estado configura-se, então, como potência do meio, pois não está no começo e nem no final / Abstract: This work introduces and puts into practice the category of the third state as a tool for reflection in the analysis of representative texts by João Guimarães Rosa. When considering the narrative in a traditional perspective, I believe that the conflict initially proposed to set the plot in motion is the first state, while the solution of the conflict within the expectation created by the first state would result in what I have termed the second state. I assume it is possible to refer to the first and second states even when the composition of the narrative can be said to put the conflict in motion, in a metalinguistic arc. Therefore, the third state forms, together with the first and second ones, a circular triangle, from which the initial conflict is disestablished in such a way as to relocate the resolution/denouement. In other words, the expectations are subverted and the text, in its form and content, updates the conflict. In that perspective, I make use of Gilles Deleuze's considerations about the rhizome and the current/virtual dualism, concluding that the third state is a rhizomatic solution, as it implies multiple possibilities of "becoming", which end up subverting certain preconceived notions and establishing new and unpredictable shortcuts, capable of subverting the expectation that the plot may raise at first. Concomitantly with the reflections on the idea of the rhizome and the current/virtual dualism, I aim at relating the third state to the fantastic tradition, departing from the reflexive character proposed by fantastic narratives when they confront the character and a phenomenon that is not appropriated through rational action only. In dealing with the fantastic tradition what matters, above all, is the idea of a fantastic encounter, that is, what happens between the character and the phenomenon and allows action in the tale. In the same way it is relevant to establish the boundaries of the fantastic discourse in relation to the work of Guimarães Rosa, once the immediate reference of that discourse is the rational world, even from a perspective of negation. Such an opposition does not occur in the work of Guimarães Rosa, once it is not possible to think of a polarized relation with reason, but of the configuration of a fictional world in which reason is already an effect of subversion, as it does not work as a basis for the narratives. In fantastic narratives, the encounter between the phenomenon and the character results, on both sides, in a transformation of "becoming", so that the strange and irrational element becomes part of the character and, later, in the denouement, part of the world to which they belong. If in traditional fantastic narratives the phenomenon is a disturbing element with threatening and potentially destructive dimensions, and it is the character's role to subvert that determination, in Guimarães Rosa, the element - the third state - that incorporates itself so as to change the logic of the character's experience in the world has an intensely rhizomatic nature, as it does not start or end, it is always in the middle, in between things, inter-being, intermezzo (DELEUZE & GUATTARRI, 1995, p. 37). The third state is thus, a middle power, as it is neither at the beginning nor at the end / Doutorado / Teoria e Critica Literaria / Doutor em Teoria e História Literária

No description available.

"Thèse en cotutelle, Doctorat en philosophie: Université Laval, Québec, Canada, Philosophiæ doctor (Ph. D.) et École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France". / Tableau d’honneur de la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales, 2017 / Concept éminemment polysémique, le sens commun a été déprécié par un vaste pan de la philosophie occidentale, qui y a vu au mieux l’expression de croyances infondées, au pire la manifestation de croyances erronées et naïves. Là où bon nombre de commentateurs ont repéré dans les pensées mêmes d’Henri Bergson, Stanley Cavell et Gilles Deleuze, trois grandes figures de la philosophie du cinéma, des critiques adressées au sens commun, nous nous efforçons ici de tirer au clair la conception positive qu’ils développent de cette notion, en dépit des soupçons occasionnels qu’ils font peser sur elle. Plus précisément, nous tâchons d’expliquer jusqu’à quel point certaines acceptions du sens commun permettent de satisfaire l’ambition de connaître le réel lui-même. En premier lieu, nous passons en revue l’argumentation élaborée par certains réalistes spéculatifs (en particulier Quentin Meillassoux et Graham Harman) afin de clarifier d’une part des réflexions qui feront l’objet de discussions et de répliques dans les chapitres subséquents et, d’autre part, de montrer que la dépréciation philosophique du sens commun se prolonge jusque dans les débats les plus actuels sur l’objectivité. Nous faisons ressortir par la suite les angles sous lesquels le sens commun est susceptible de nous rapprocher du réel d’après Bergson, Cavell et Deleuze. En second lieu, nous entrons de plain-pied dans le domaine du cinéma et examinons en quoi différentes oeuvres du renouveau du cinéma québécois (Denis Côté, Stéphane Lafleur, Sébastien Pilote, Rafaël Ouellet, Xavier Dolan, Anne Émond, Rodrigue Jean, le collectif Épopée, Mathieu Denis et Simon Lavoie) viennent à leur manière compléter, radicaliser ou critiquer les réflexions développées dans la première partie autour du sens commun et du réel. À l’encontre de ceux qui qualifient ces oeuvres de « mimétiques », « peu songées » et « esthétisantes », nous mettons donc en évidence la façon dont ces films, attentifs à la profondeur de l’expérience ordinaire et à l’exigence de trouver un certain équilibre entre le devenir incessant et la stabilité constante, parviennent à nuancer et à raffiner la philosophie. Mots-clés : sens commun, réel, ordinaire, chose en soi, objectivité, subjectivité, surinterprétation, culture populaire, actuel, virtuel, devenir, intensité, concrétude, cinéma, Henri Bergson, Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Quentin Meillassoux, Graham Harman, Tristan Garcia, renouveau du cinéma québécois. / The eminently polysemic concept of common sense was depreciated by a vast segment of Western philosophy, which saw at best in it the expression of unwarranted beliefs, at worst the manifestation of erroneous and naïve beliefs. Where many commentators have pinpointed critiques of common sense in the thoughts of Henri Bergson, Stanley Cavell and Gilles Deleuze, three prominent figures of the philosophy of cinema, we strive here to bring out the positive conception they develop of that concept, notwithstanding the occasional suspicion they may cast on it. To put it in more precise terms, we seek to explain to what extent certain meanings of common sense are apt to satisfy the ambition of knowing reality itself. In the first place, we review the argument elaborated by certain speculative realists (specifically Quentin Meillassoux and Graham Harman) in order to clarify, on the one hand, reflections which will be the object of discussions and replies in the subsequent chapters, and, on the other hand, to show that the philosophical depreciation of common sense goes on even in the most contemporary debates on objectivity. We then bring out the angles under which, according to Bergson, Cavell and Deleuze, common sense is apt to bring us closer to reality itself. In the second place, we enter fully into the field of cinema and examine in what way different works associated with the revival of Quebec cinema (Denis Côté, Stéphane Lafleur, Sébastien Pilote, Rafaël Ouellet, Xavier Dolan, Anne Émond, Rodrigue Jean, the collective Épopée, Mathieu Denis and Simon Lavoie) end up completing, radicalizing or criticizing in their way the reflections developed in the first part around common sense and the real. In opposition to those who characterize those works as « mimetic », « thoughtless » and « aestheticizing », we thus bring to the fore the way in which those films, paying attention to the depth of ordinary experience and to the requirement of finding a certain balance between incessant becoming and constant stability, do succeed in nuancing and refining philosophy. Keywords: common sense, real, ordinary, thing-in-itself, objectivity, subjectivity, over-interpretation, popular culture, actual, virtual, becoming, intensity, concreteness, cinema, Henri Bergson, Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Quentin Meillassoux, Graham Harman, Tristan Garcia, revival of Quebec cinema.

Cette thèse propose de suivre la lecture deleuzienne de Spinoza afin de montrer comment Deleuze inscrit sa philosophie de la différence dans l'histoire de la philosophie et de la métaphysique. Loin d'être condescendant envers l'histoire de cette discipline, Deleuze légitime sa conception bi-univoque de la différence à l'aide du parallélisme entre la Nature naturante et la Nature naturée de Spinoza. La différenciation de l'actuel (les modes, l'événement) se fait dans la différentiation du virtuel et c'est en procédant de la sorte que Deleuze participe de plain-pied à la tradition immanentiste de la philosophie où l'être se dit seulement de la différence qu'il exprime. Plus encore, cette thèse explique comment Deleuze reprend les principes de cette métaphysique immanentiste pour établir sa conception de la subjectivité. Là aussi, sa lecture de Spinoza est essentielle, car en affirmant la non-substantialisation de l'âme comme le fait Spinoza, Deleuze peut attaquer, à la racine, les fondements épistémologiques des philosophies du sujet de son époque (existentialisme et phénoménologie en tête). Pour Deleuze, cette conception modale de l'âme et de la subjectivité appuie, métaphysiquement parlant, une épistémologie fondée sur la passivité du sujet. Loin d'être le fondement de la vérité des idées, la conscience d'un moi dans l'âme est, pour Deleuze, un résultat synthétisé, jamais une fonction synthétisante. En ce sens, l'ultime réduction de la philosophie n'est plus l'ego cogito cartésien, mais consiste à reconnaître la fêlure du Je. Deleuze construit ainsi, en envisageant la place de l'imagination dans la puissance de connaître l'âme, une autre épistémologie que celle du sujet fondateur transcendantal ou transcendant. Pour lui, le constat est clair : comment pouvons-nous croire que nous sommes responsables de l'idée que nous formons de nous-mêmes (et s'établir sur celle-ci pour fonder, épistémologiquement, nos idées sur les choses) si nous ne savons même pas ce que peut notre corps, ni comment celui-ci peut affecter et être affecté par notre âme ? Ce principe de « l'inconnu du corps » relativise l'éminence de l'âme et inscrit Deleuze à la fois dans l'une des plus importantes batailles philosophiques de la Modernité (celle de Spinoza contre Descartes) et dans la crise de la subjectivité qui caractérise la pensée française au moment des années soixante. Mots clés : Deleuze ; Spinoza ; Descartes ; histoire de la philosophie ; métaphysique ; épistémologie ; subjectivité ; différence ; actuel ; virtuel ; Je fêlé ; corps ; imagination ; éthologie.

La communication, souvent considérée de nos jours comme une solution à plusieurs problèmes philosophiques, constitue pourtant elle-même un problème de taille en philosophie. Les philosophes peuvent-ils se comprendre entre eux ou sont-ils condamnés pour toujours à travailler seuls? Quand on observe de plus près les «oppositions» philosophiques, même les plus connues, on constate qu'on ne peut pas parler de rencontre avec exactitude. Ce mémoire analyse plus spécialement sous cet aspect le conflit sur le fondement de la morale qui oppose traditionnellement déontologistes et conséquentialistes, où l'on pourra apprécier l'asymétrie des deux systèmes notamment en ce qui concerne la question de l'universalité du fondement et celle de l'autonomie de la morale. Cependant, l'étude des philosophes passés et présents constituant également un dialogue entre philosophes, toute conclusion déplorant l'état du dialogue entre les philosophes ne saurait être prise totalement au sérieux.

Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2012. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study comprises a philosophical investigation into the development of a non-representational resistance against the State, with specific focus on the role of the imagination in both repression and the struggle for freedom. Using Deleuze & Guattari’s non-representasional ontology, the researcher argues that Deleuze and Guattari’s ontological system can be described as an ontological anarchy, which supplies us with tactics of resistance that strongly deviates from traditional Representational or Revolutionary models of resistance. Building on a discussion of Situationism and Hakim Bey’s T.A.Z, the argument is made that these non-representasional resistive tactics could ‘open’ the category of art up to a whole network of creative and life practices – a transformation that has the ability to free art as well as the everyday. In stead of refecting back on a supposed ‘background’ Reality, this resistance relies on the ontologically anarchic practice of reality production. The idea of the non-ordinary or peak experience, assosiated with sorcery, plays a crucial role in this production process, and the argument is made for the use the of these experiences to create a lasting peak experience, ultimately constituting a shared level of peak intensity between people that the researcher calls ‘the revolution of the imagination’. Key words: ontology, anarchy, anarchism, the State, resistance, revolution, imagination, complexity, ontology of art, poststructuralism, Representation, non-representationality, peak experience, sorcery, the everyday, Situationism, psychogeography, geophilosopy, phenomenology. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie is ʼn filosofiese ondersoek na die ontwikkeling van ʼn nie-representasionele weerstand teen die Staat, met besondere klem op die rol van die verbeelding in die onderdrukking van, sowél as die stryd om vryheid. Deur middel van Deleuze & Guattari se nie-representasionele ontologie word daar tussen Representasie, wat met die Staat as komplekse en gesamentlik geproduseerde sosiale konfigurasie verband hou, en nie-representasionaliteit, wat met anargisme saamhang, onderskei. Die navorser voer aan dat Deleuze & Guattari se ontologiese sisteem as ʼn ontologiese anargie beskryf kan word wat ons van weerstandstaktieke voorsien wat sterk van tradisionele Representasionele of Rewolusionêre weerstandsmodelle afwyk. Na aanleiding van ʼn bespreking van Situasionisme en Hakim Bey se T.A.Z word daar betoog dat hierdie nie-representasionele weerstandstaktieke, die kategorie van kuns kan ‘oopmaak’ tot ʼn hele netwerk van ander kreatiewe en lewenspraktyke – ʼn transformasie wat terselfdertyd kuns én die alledaagse kan bevry. In plaas daarvan om terug te kaats op ʼn veronderstelde ‘agtergrond’- Werklikheid, gaan dié stryd om die ontologies anargiese praktyk van werklikheidsproduksie. Die idee van nie-gewone ervaring, of die spitservaring, wat met towery geassosieer word, speel ʼn sentrale rol in hierdie produksie, en daar word aangevoer dat dit gebruik kan word om van álle ervarings ʼn verlengde spitservaring te maak – ʼn gedeelde vlak van intensiteit onder mense wat die navorser ‘die rewolusie van die verbeelding’ noem. Trefwoorde: ontologie, anargie, anargisme, die Staat, weerstand, rewolusie, verbeelding, kompleksiteit, ontologie van kuns, poststrukturalisme, Representasie, nie-representasionaliteit, spitservaring, towery, die alledaagse, Situasionisme, psigogeografie, geofilosofie, fenomenologie.

Thesis (PhD)-- Stellenbosch University, 2013. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation examines the idea of apocalypse through the lens of science fiction (sf) written during the current fin de siècle period. I have dated this epoch, known as the information era, as starting in 1980 with the advent of personal computing and ending in approximately 2020 when the functional limits of silicon-based digital manufacturing and production are expected to be reached. By surveying the field of contemporary sf, I identify certain trends and subgenres that relate to particular aspects of apocalyptic thought, namely, conceptions of the ‘terror of history,’ the sublimity of accelerated techno-scientific advance, the ‘affective turn’ in media-culture and posthuman philosophy. My principal method of inquiry into how the apocalypse is imagined or ‘figured’ in sf is the concept of hyperstition – a neologism (combining the words ‘hyper’ and ‘superstition’) coined by the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU). Hyperstition describes an aesthetic response whereby cultural fictions – principally, ideas relating to apocalypse – are imagined as transmuting into material realities. I begin by scrutinizing two posthumanist works of theory-fiction (theory written in the mode of sf) by the CCRU and 0rphan Drift which anticipate immanent human extinction and imagine the inception of a new evolutionary cycle of machine-augmented evolution This sensibility is premised on the sociallydestabilising cycles of exponential growth that characterise information-era technological developments, particularly in the digital industries, as well as the accelerated human impact on the natural environment. Central to my argument is the romantic materialist philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari and their concepts of accelerationism, schizoanalysis and Bodies without Organs (BwO’s). Their ontology is constructed around the idea that exponential rates of development necessitate a new aesthetic paradigm that ventures beyond philosophies of human access. The narrative of apocalypse, approached from this perspective, can be interpreted in catastrophic or anastrophic terms; either as a permanent ending or as the beginning of something radically new. Using hyperstition, I also investigate the sf of Russell Hoban, Michael Swanwick, Brian Stableford, Charles Stross, Dan Simmons, M. John Harrison and Paul McAuley to see not only how these authors interpret the concept of cultural acceleration, but also to identify common threads. Countering the catastrophic ‘death of affect’ postulated by theorists such as Jean Baudrillard and Paul Virilio with the anastrophic rejoinder of cyberdelic information-era countercultures, I conclude by investigating the new ‘affective turn’ in contemporary media theory. The works of theoretical fiction and sf that I investigate are informed, as I demonstrate, by the Situationist techniques of psychogeography, dérive and detournement, as well as by the literary tropes of 18th and 19th century fin de siècle Gothic and dark Romantic fiction. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie proefskrif ondersoek die idee van apokalips deur die oogpunt van wetenskap fiksie (wf) soos geskryf gedurende die huidige ‘fin de siècle’ tydperk. Ek dateer hierdie epog, bekend as die inligtings-era, as die tydperk wat in 1980 begin met die koms van persoonlike rekenaars en nagenoeg eindig in 2020, wanneer die funksionele limiete van silikon gebaseerde digitale vervaardiging en produksie na verwagting bereik sal word. Deur die veld van kontemporêre wf in oënskou te neem, identifiseer ek sekere neigings en sub-genres wat vergelyk met sekere kenmerke van apokaliptiese denke, naamlik: begrippe soos die ‘verskrikking van geskiedenis’, die verhewendheid van versnelde tegno-wetenskaplike vooruitgang, die ‘emosionele omkeer’ in media-kultuur en post-humanistiese filosofie. My primêre metode van ondersoek van hoe die apokalips voorgestel of ‘beskryf’ kan word in wf, is die begrip van hiper-bygelowigheid - ‘n neologisme (samevoeging van die woorde ‘hiper’ en ‘bygeloof’) soos geskep deur die Kubernetiese Kultuur Navorsings-Eenheid (KKNE) en Nick Land, medestigter van die KKNE. Hiper-bygelowigheid beskryf die proses waarvolgens kulturele versinsels - hoofsaaklik opvattings met betrekking tot apokalips – in materiële realiteite omgeskakel kan word. Ek ondersoek ek twee post-humanistiese werke van teorie-fiksie (teorie geskryf volgens die wf metode) deur KKNE en 0rphan Drift, wat inherente menslike uitwissing verwag en die ontstaan van ‘n nuwe evolusionêre siklus van masjien-toename voorstel. Hierdie proses is gebaseer op die sosiaal-destabiliserende siklus van eksponensiële groei wat kenmerkend is van die inligtings-era se tegnologiese ontwikkelinge, veral in die digitale industrie, sowel as versnelde menslike impak op die natuurlike omgewing. Die kern van my beredenering is die goties-materialisties-teoriese standpunt soos deur Land ingeneem, sowel as die romanties-materialistiese filosofie van Deleuze en Guattari. Hierdie gevalle van neo-materialistiese (of objek-georiënteerde) filosofië word toegelig deur ‘n apokalipties-teoretiese basis bekend as akseleerasionisme. Hierdie uitgangspunt is ontwikkel rondom die idee dat die eksponensiële tempo van ontwikkeling ‘n klimaks sal bereik in ‘n evolusionêre ‘wipplank punt’ en dat ‘n nuwe estetiese paradigma nodig is wat dit bokant die filosofie van menslike vermoë kan waag sodat daar oor hierdie waarskynlikheid geteoretiseer kan word. Die beskrywing van apokalips, soos vanuit hierdie oogpunt beskou, kan vertolk word in beide katastrofiese of anastrofiese terme of as ‘n permanente einde of as die begin van iets wat radikaal nuut sal wees. Deur gebruik te maak van die hiperbygelowigheidsteorie, wat ‘n onderafdeling is van akseleerasionisme, ondersoek ek WF van Russell Hoban, Michael Swanwick, Brian Stableford, Charles Stross, Dan Simmons, M. John Harrison and Paul McAuley ten einde vas te stel hoe hierdie skrywers die konsep van kulturele akseleerasie interpreteer, maar ook om gemeenskaplike leidrade te identifiseer. Met teenargumentering ten opsigte van die katastrofiese ‘dood van affek’ gepostuleer deur teoretici soos Jean Baudrillard en Paul Virillio met die anastrofiese samevoeging van kuberdeliese inligtings-era-kontra-kulture, ondersoek ek die nuwe ‘gemoedsomkeer’ in kontemporêre mediateorie. Die werke van teoretiese fiksie, sowel as baie van die ander gevalle van wf wat ek ondersoek en soos deur my gedemonstreer, word toegelig deur Situasienistiese tegnieke van psigo-geografie, dérive en detournement, sowel as deur die literêre menigtes van die 19de eeu ‘fin de siècle’ donker Romantiese en Gotiese fiksie.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:39:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafael Domingues Adaime.pdf: 2962262 bytes, checksum: f1d0a77fd261ce9788d1ea724b3760a7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03-27 / This dissertation is a study of experimental procedures in psychotherapy, in which I intend to give visibil ity through some cases and theoretical elements, to the way I have worked at the clinic through experimentation, by the influence of the work of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, the schizoanalysis / Esta dissertação é um estudo sobre procedimentos experimentais em psicoterapia, em que procuro dar visibil idade, através de alguns casos e elementos teóricos, para o modo como tenho trabalhado na clínica pela via da experimentação, por influência da obra de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari, a esquizoanálise

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:39:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Vanessa Maldonado.pdf: 283841 bytes, checksum: 2b1fa48500437b19dda676bf6ea8032e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03-27 / This research intends to delineate a study interested in analyse and evaluate the way as relations politics and subjective involve us as informing of the capitalism contemporary. For in such a way, we will look for to understand as the workmanships of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, either of the critical interior of a philosophical one, either of the critical interior of the psychological one, they circumscribe the complex relation enters the way of capitalist production and certain lines of efetuação that cross psychological clinics. The choice of these authors was not given for exclusion of innumerable others, but mainly because certain reflections and determined concepts gifts in its writings still reveal decisive in the characterization problematic contemporary of an deserving one of the attention in the psychological clinic. Thus, this study the inquiry of the politician-subjective constitution of the gift is dedicated to it. Looking for to locate the micron become entangled that in involves them in socius and that in they bind them process to a complex of economic mundialização, cultural and subjective that if translates politics capable to instrumentalizar the life. We understand that this instrumentalização of the life directly implies on dynamic to the functioning of the desire and that, probably, this implication corresponds the producing politics of subjetivação of symptoms not only tied with the nosológico register of the psicopatologia, as also to the sintomatologia of a civilization. Perhaps of this form, this study in it helps them to inside configure conditions of possible interferences that if it can call generically capitalism, observing, in the same measure, the capitalist machine in its extensive and intensive domain of relations of forces, understanding its captures and the extension of its reverberações in the bodies / Esta dissertação pretende delinear o eixo condutor de um estudo interessado em problematizar o modo como relações políticas e subjetivas nos envolvem como partícipes do capitalismo contemporâneo. Para tanto, procuraremos compreender como as obras de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari, seja do interior da crítica filosófica, seja do interior da crítica psicológica, circunscrevem a complexa relação entre o modo de produção capitalista e certas linhas de efetuação que atravessam clínicas psicológicas. A escolha desses autores não se deu por exclusão de inúmeros outros, mas principalmente porque certas reflexões e determinados conceitos presentes em seus escritos mostram-se ainda decisivos na caracterização contemporânea de uma problemática merecedora da atenção na clínica psicológica. Para tanto, este estudo dedica-se à investigação da constituição político-subjetiva do presente. Procurando localizar micro emaranhados que nos envolvem no socius e que nos ligam a um complexo processo de mundialização econômica, cultural e subjetiva que se traduz em políticas capazes de instrumentalizar a vida. Entendemos que essa instrumentalização da vida implica dinâmicas diretamente ligadas ao funcionamento do desejo e que, provavelmente, essa implicação corresponda a políticas de subjetivação produtoras de sintomas não apenas vinculados ao registro nosológico da psicopatologia, como também à sintomatologia de uma civilização. Desta forma, este estudo talvez nos ajude a configurar condições de interferências possíveis dentro do que se pode chamar genericamente de capitalismo, observando, na mesma medida, a máquina capitalista em seu domínio extensivo e intensivo de relações de forças, compreendendo suas capturas e a extensão de suas reverberações nos corpos

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:40:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paula Chieffi.pdf: 470461 bytes, checksum: 7e247d167739beb73ed1948b22db4310 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-06-22 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Based on concepts and thought of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, the present research aims at outlining contemporary politics action. In this direction were interviewed six different people - different experiences, different social practices. This dissertation dialogues with art and political anthropology to compose desiring forces able to enlarge the potency to say yes to other forms of existence. The intensive experience and its expression, multiplicity and the direct act characterize politics as nomadic, disruptive and intense / Esta dissertação busca cartografar ações políticas contemporâneas. Para isso entrevista seis diferentes pessoas - que configuram práticas sociais e experiências distintas - e dialoga com a arte e a antropologia política para rastrear e pensar composições de força do desejo que favorecem a afirmação de novas possibilidades de vida. Tem como principal ferramenta o pensamento de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari. O encontro intensivo e a expressão de seus efeitos, a multiplicidade, a ação direta, o pensamento em cruzamento com a cidade e o foco na experiência sensível são alguns elementos que caracterizam políticas nômades, transversais e intempestivas. Políticas outras