Introdução: A Doença do Refluxo Gastroesofágico (DRGE) possui elevada prevalência e morbidade. O tratamento clínico consiste em recomendações quanto ao estilo de vida e, essencialmente, no uso de inibidores da bomba protônica (IBP). A aderência (Ad) dos pacientes com DRGE à prescrição, embora fundamental para o sucesso terapêutico, tem sido pouco estudada. Objetivo: Avaliar a Ad ao tratamento com IBP e possíveis variáveis relacionadas em pacientes com DRGE. Métodos: Estudo transversal e prospectivo com 240 pacientes adultos consecutivos com DRGE erosiva e não-erosiva (ne-DRGE) que haviam recebido dose padrão ou dose dobrada de omeprazol em uso contínuo. Todos os pacientes foram classificados conforme o grau, segundo os achados da endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) em ne-DRGE (162; 67,5%), classificação endoscópica de Los Angeles (LA) A (48; 20,0%), LA B (21; 8,6%), LA C (1; 0,4%), LA D (1; 0,4%) e Barrett (7; 2,9%). Foi aplicado o questionário de Morisky et al constituído de 4 questões com respostas dicotômicas para avaliar a Ad, classificando-a como baixa (0-2 pontos) e alta ad (3-4 pontos). Foi também aplicado o questionário QS-DRGE para a avaliação dos sintomas, com 10 questões com escores de 0 a 50, conforme a frequência menor ou maior dos sintomas. Os resultados de Ad foram relacionados com os dados sócio-demográficos, polifarmácia (PF) (uso de mais de cinco medicamentos diariamente), comorbidades (CM), tempo de tratamento (TT), escore QS-DRGE, presença de sintomas descrita em prontuário, achados da EDA e conhecimento do paciente sobre a doença. Resultados: (1) 126 pacientes (52,5%) apresentaram alta Ad e 114 (47,5%) baixa Ad; (2) Os pacientes mais jovens (p = 0,002) foram menos aderentes; (3) Pacientes sintomáticos de acordo com relato em prontuário apresentaram maior percentual de baixa Ad e 2 vezes maior probabilidade de ter baixa Ad em relação aos assintomáticos (p = 0,02); (4) Os pacientes casados apresentam probabilidade 2,41 vezes maior de ter baixa Ad do que os viúvos. (5) As demais variáveis estudadas não influenciaram a Ad ao tratamento. Conclusões: Pacientes em uso de IBP em tratamento ambulatorial em hospital terciário em São Paulo apresentaram grande percentual de baixa Ad ao tratamento, sendo esta uma possível causa da falha da terapia com IBP. Idade < 60 anos e estado civil casado podem ser fatores de risco para a baixa Ad / Introduction: The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent disease and a major cause of morbidity. Clinical treatment is based on lifestyle recommendations and, essentially, in the use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Adherence (Ad) of GERD patients to the prescribed treatment, although critical for therapeutic success, has been little studied. Objective: Assess adherence to the PPI treatment and potential associated variables in patients with GERD. Case studies and Methods: Transversal and prospective study with 240 consecutive adult patients, diagnosed with erosive GERD (e-GERD) and non-erosive GERD (ne-GERD) for whom continuous use of the standard dose or the double dose of omeprazol had been prescribed. Patients were ranked according to the findings of high digestive endoscopy (HDE) in ne-GERD (162; 67.5%); e-GERD: Los Angeles (LA) endoscopic classification A (48; 20.0%), LA B (21; 8.6%), LA C (1; 0.5%), and LA D (1; 0.5%) and Barretts esophagus (7; 2.9%). The Morisky questionnaire, that includes four questions with dicotomic responses to assess Ad, was applied. Ad was classified as low (0-2 points) and high (3-4 points). In addition, the QS-GERD questionnaire was applied to assess symptoms, using 10 questions with score 0 to 50, according to the greater or lesser symptom frequency. Ad results were correlated with personal data (gender and age), demography, polypharmacy (PF), comorbidities (CM), treatment time (TT), QS-GERD scores, symptoms described in the patients record, HDE findings and patient awareness about the disease. Results: (1) 126 patients (52.5%) exhibited high Ad and 114 (47.5%) low Ad; (2) younger patients (p = 0,002) were less compliant; (3) married patients had a 2.41 greater probability to exhibit low Ad as compared to widowers (p = 0.03); (4) patients with symptoms indicated in the patients record exhibited a lower Ad rate and twice greater probability of exhibiting low Ad as compared to asymptomatic patients (p = 0.02); (5) the other variables studied had no influence on treatment adherence. Conclusion: Patients using PPI as out-patients in third care hospital in São Paulo exhibited high rate of reduced treatment adherence, and this may be a potential cause of PPI therapy failure. Age < 60 years and marital status may be risk factors for low adherence

A pHmetria esofágica é considerada o melhor método diagnóstico do refluxo ácido gastroesofágico. Contudo, é bastante incômoda e restringe consideravelmente as atividades cotidianas do paciente. A pHmetria sem cateter foi desenvolvida para contornar tais limitações. OBJETIVOS: Comparar as pHmetrias convencional e sem cateter em relação: ao grau de incômodo e limitações das atividades cotidianas, à ocorrência de falhas técnicas relevantes, à capacidade de detecção do refluxo e de relacionar as queixas clínicas com o mesmo. Objetiva-se também, verificar se a monitorização mais prolongada (48 horas) oferece vantagens em relação à monitorização usual (24 horas). MÉTODOS: Foram estudados, de modo prospectivo, 25 pacientes encaminhados para realização de pHmetria esofágica, com sintomas típicos da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, como queixa predominante. Todos pacientes foram submetidos à entrevista clínica, manometria esofágica e realização, com período inicial simultâneo, de pHmetrias com cateter (24 horas) e sem cateter (48 horas). Foi aplicado questionário para avaliação do grau de incômodo, após o término das pHmetrias. RESULTADOS: Quanto ao incômodo na introdução dos sensores de medida de pH, quinze (60%) pacientes apontaram a cápsula como mais incômoda e dez (40%) o cateter (p=0,327). Durante a monitorização, o incômodo foi menor no segundo dia em relação ao primeiro, em todos os itens do questionário (p<0,05). Houve queda precoce da cápsula em um (4%) paciente e nenhuma falha técnica relevante na pHmetria com cateter (p=0,463). As porcentagens de tempo de refluxo (total, ortostático e supino) foram mais elevadas na pHmetria sem cateter (p<0,05). O Índice de Sintomas foi positivo em 12 (48%) pacientes na pHmetria com cateter e em 13 (52%) na pHmetria sem cateter (p=0,777). O Índice de Sintomas foi positivo em 13 (52%) pacientes na pHmetria por tempo usual (24h) e em 14 (56%) na mais prolongada (48h) (p=1,000). CONCLUSÕES: Nas condições da presente pesquisa: 1) Não há diferença significante entre as duas modalidades de pHmetria, em relação ao grau de incômodo na introdução dos sensores de pH (cápsula X cateter) e nem quanto à ocorrência de falhas técnicas relevantes durante o exame; 2) A monitorização do refluxo pela pHmetria sem cateter é menos incômoda que a com cateter. A pHmetria sem cateter detecta refluxo em porcentagens superiores aos detectados pela pHmetria convencional; 3) Os dois métodos de pHmetria têm capacidades semelhantes de relacionar as queixas clínicas com o refluxo; 4) A monitorização mais prolongada (48h) não proporciona incremento significante na capacidade de relacionar as queixas clínicas com o refluxo, em relação à monitorização por tempo usual (24h). / Esophageal pH monitoring is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal acid reflux. However, this method is very troublesome and considerably limits the patients routine activities. Wireless pH monitoring was developed to avoid these restrictions. OBJECTIVES: To compare conventional and wireless pH monitoring in relation to: routine activity limitations and degree of discomfort, the occurrence of relevant technical failures, the ability to detect reflux and to correlate the clinical symptoms to it. An additional objective is to determine if longer monitoring (48-hour) offers any advantages over usual monitoring (24-hour). METHOD: Twenty-five patients referred for esophageal pH monitoring and with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease as the main complaint were studied prospectively. All patients underwent clinical interview, esophageal manometry and were submitted, with a simultaneous initial period, to 24-hour catheter pH monitoring and 48-hour wireless pH monitoring. After each pH-metry the patients completed a questionnaire on the degree of discomfort. RESULTS: Fifteen (60%) patients reported a higher level of discomfort to introduce the capsule and ten (40%) to introduce the catheter (p=0.327). For all questionnaire items, less discomfort was reported during the second day of monitoring in comparison to the first day (p<0.05). Early capsule detachment occurred in one (4%) case and there were no relevant technical failures with the catheter pH monitoring (p=0.463). Percentages of reflux time (total, upright and supine) were higher with the wireless pH monitoring (p<0.05). The Symptom Index was positive in 12 (48%) patients with catheter pH monitoring and in 13 (52%) with wireless pH monitoring (p=0.777). The Symptom Index was positive in 13 (52%) patients with usual 24-hour pH-metry and in 14 (56%) with longer pH-metry (48-hour) (p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of the current research: 1) No significant differences were reported between the two methods of pH monitoring, in relation to the degree of discomfort to introduce the pH sensors (capsule X catheter) or in regard to relevant technical failures; 2) During pH monitoring, the wireless system is better tolerated than the catheter. Wireless pH monitoring detected higher percentages of reflux time than the conventional pH-metry; 3) The two methods of pH monitoring were comparable in correlating the clinical symptoms with the reflux; 4) The longer 48-hour pH monitoring does not significantly improve the ability to correlate the clinical symptoms with the reflux in relation to the 24-hour pH monitoring.

Por padronização aceita internacionalmente, posiciona-se o sensor distal de pH-metria esofágica a 5 cm acima da borda superior do esfíncter inferior do esôfago, identificado por manometria esofágica. Porém, vários autores sugerem técnicas alternativas de posicionamento que prescindem da manometria; dentre essas, destaca-se a da viragem do pH. Esse tema é controverso: alguns autores consideram a técnica da viragem confiável, outros afirmam que não é. Considerando-se a polêmica existente e o pequeno número de trabalhos prospectivos com amostra e metodologia adequadas, idealizamos o presente estudo, que tem por objetivos avaliar a adequação do posicionamento do sensor distal de pH-metria baseado na técnica da viragem, analisando-se a presença, o grau e o tipo de erro de posicionamento que tal técnica proporciona e a influência da posição adotada pelo paciente durante a manobra. Foram estudados, de modo prospectivo, 1031 pacientes encaminhados para realização de pH-metria esofágica. Durante entrevista clínica, foram registrados os dados demográficos e as queixas clínicas apresentadas. Todos pacientes foram submetidos à manometria esofágica para localização do esfíncter inferior do esôfago e à técnica da viragem do pH, que consiste na introdução do sensor de pH-metria na câmara gástrica e na tração gradual do mesmo até que o pH vire para níveis superiores a 4. A identificação do ponto de viragem foi realizada de dois modos distintos, caracterizando dois grupos de estudo: com o paciente sentado (Grupo I - 450 pacientes) e em decúbito dorsal horizontal (Grupo II - 581 pacientes). Após a identificação do ponto de viragem, o sensor distal de pH-metria era posicionado na posição padronizada, baseada na localização manométrica do esfíncter. Registrava-se onde seria posicionado o sensor de pH se fosse adotada a técnica da viragem. Para avaliação da adequação do posicionamento, considerou-se que o erro é representado pela diferença (em centímetros) entre a localização padronizada e a localização que seria adotada caso fosse empregada a técnica da viragem. Considerou-se que o erro seria grosseiro se fosse maior que 2 cm. Analisou-se também o tipo de erro mais freqüente: se acima ou abaixo da posição padronizada. Observou-se que se fosse adotada a técnica da viragem, haveria erro no posicionamento do sensor em 945 pacientes (91,6%). Quanto ao grau de erro, haveria erro grosseiro em 597 (63,2%) casos. Em relação ao tipo de erro, o sensor seria posicionado abaixo do local padronizado em 857 (90,7%) pacientes. Em relação à interferência da posição adotada pelo paciente durante a técnica da viragem, observou-se que não houve diferença significante entre os grupos de estudo, em nenhum dos parâmetros analisados. Conclui-se que: 1. o posicionamento do sensor distal de pH-metria pela técnica da viragem não é confiável; 2. a técnica da viragem proporciona margem de erro expressiva; 3. o tipo de erro mais comum que tal modalidade técnica proporciona é o posicionamento mais distal do sensor, que pode superestimar a ocorrência de refluxo; 4. não há influência da posição adotada pelo paciente durante a realização da técnica da viragem do pH, na eficiência do método / By internationally accepted standardization, the esophageal pH-meter distal sensor is positioned 5 cm above the superior border of the esophagus lower sphincter, identified by esophageal manometry. However, several authors suggest alternative positioning techniques that leave out the manometry; among such techniques, the pH step-up is the one to be pointed out. This subject is controversial; some publications state that the step-up technique is not reliable while some others consider it reliable. Considering the existent controversy and the small number of prospective works with suitable sample and methodology, we have idealized the present study, that aims the evaluation of the suitability of the pH-meter distal sensor positioning based on the step-up technique, by analyzing the presence, the degree and the type of the error of positioning that such technique provides and the influence of the position adopted by the patient during the procedure. 1031 patients conducted to the esophageal pH-meter procedure were studied in a prospective way. During the clinical interview, the demographic data and the presented clinical complaints were registered. All the patients were submitted to both esophageal manometry in order to localize the esophagus lower sphincter and the pH step-up technique, that consists of the introduction of the pH-meter sensor in the gastric chamber and in the sensors gradual traction until the pH steps up to levels over 4. The step-up point was identified by two distinct ways, characterizing two study groups: with the setting patient (Group I - 450 patients) and in supine position (Group I I- 581 patients). After the step-up point identification, the pH-meter distal sensor was placed in the standard position, based on the sphincter manometric placement. It was registered where the pH sensor would be positioned if the step-up technique were adopted. To evaluate the positioning suitability, the error was considered to be represented by the difference (in centimeters) between the suitable placement (manometry) and the one that would be adopted in case the step-up technique were adopted. The positioning error was considered rough if it were larger than 2 cm. The most frequent type of error was also analyzed: if above or below the standard position. It was observed that if the step-up technique were adopted, there would be error in the sensor positioning in 945 patients (91.6%). In terms of error degree, there would be a rough error in 597 (63.2%) cases. Concerning the type of error, the sensor would be positioned below the standard place in 857 (90.7%) patients. As to the interference of the position adopted by the patient during the step-up technique, it was observed that there was no significant difference among the groups of study, in any of the analyzed parameters. It was concluded that: 1. the positioning of the pH-meter distal sensor by the step-up technique is not reliable; 2. the step-up technique provides expressive error margin; 3. the most common type of error that such technique mode provides is the placement of the sensor below the standard positioning, which may overestimate the reflux occurrence; 4. there is no influence in the position adopted by the patient during the pH step-up technique procedure, in terms of method efficiency

Author: Bc. Anežka Zasadilová Title: The effect of physiotherapy on patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease Objectives: The aim of this thesis is to design a therapeutic unit and evaluate its effect on long-term treatment in the therapy of selected patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease Methods: The group of patients treated for esophageal reflux disease was examined using a standardized questionnaire, esophageal manometry and postural tests. This was followed by a two-month therapy aimed at stretching and strengthening the diaphragm using several physiotherapeutic methods. After completing the therapy, the probands were measured again as in the same way as in the initial examination. The obtained data were evaluated by statistical analysis using a nonparametric test for one selection (Wilcoxon test). Results: The evaluation of the questionnaire survey resulted in the value of p-value = 0.007265, ie less than the selected level of alpha significance (= 0.05). Based on the Wilcoxon test, it was confirmed that the input score was statistically significantly higher than the output score. The evaluation of the esophageal manometry gave the value of p-value = 0.6956, ie greater than the selected level of significance alpha (= 0.05). Based on the Wilcoxon test, it was not confirmed that the...

No description available.

Contexte & Objectifs : La manométrie perfusée conventionnelle et la manométrie haute résolution (HRM) ont permis le développement d’une variété de paramètres pour mieux comprendre la motilité de l'œsophage et quantifier les caractéristiques de la jonction œsophago-gastrique (JOG). Cependant, l'anatomie de la JOG est complexe et les enregistrements de manométrie détectent à la fois la pression des structures intrinsèques et des structures extrinsèques à l'œsophage. Ces différents composants ont des rôles distincts au niveau de la JOG. Les pressions dominantes ainsi détectées au niveau de la JOG sont attribuables au sphincter œsophagien inférieur (SOI) et aux piliers du diaphragme (CD), mais aucune des technologies manométriques actuelles n’est capable de distinguer ces différents composants de la JOG. Lorsqu’on analyse les caractéristiques de la JOG au repos, celle ci se comporte avant tout comme une barrière antireflux. Les paramètres manométriques les plus couramment utilisés dans ce but sont la longueur de la JOG et le point d’inversion respiratoire (RIP), défini comme le lieu où le pic de la courbe de pression inspiratoire change de positif (dans l’abdomen) à négatif (dans le thorax), lors de la classique manœuvre de « pull-through ». Cependant, l'importance de ces mesures reste marginale comme en témoigne une récente prise de position de l’American Gastroenterology Association Institute (AGAI) (1) qui concluait que « le rôle actuel de la manométrie dans le reflux gastro-œsophagien (RGO) est d'exclure les troubles moteurs comme cause des symptômes présentés par la patient ». Lors de la déglutition, la mesure objective de la relaxation de la JOG est la pression de relaxation intégrée (IRP), qui permet de faire la distinction entre une relaxation normale et une relaxation anormale de la JOG. Toutefois, puisque la HRM utilise des pressions moyennes à chaque niveau de capteurs, certaines études de manométrie laissent suggérer qu’il existe une zone de haute pression persistante au niveau de la JOG même si un transit est mis en évidence en vidéofluoroscopie. Récemment, la manométrie haute résolution « 3D » (3D-HRM) a été développée (Given Imaging, Duluth, GA) avec le potentiel de simplifier l'évaluation de la morphologie et de la physiologie de la JOG. Le segment « 3D » de ce cathéter de HRM permet l'enregistrement de la pression à la fois de façon axiale et radiale tout en maintenant une position fixe de la sonde, et évitant ainsi la manœuvre de « pull-through ». Par conséquent, la 3D-HRM devrait permettre la mesure de paramètres importants de la JOG tels que sa longueur et le RIP. Les données extraites de l'enregistrement fait par 3D-HRM permettraient également de différencier les signaux de pression attribuables au SOI des éléments qui l’entourent. De plus, l’enregistrement des pressions de façon radiaire permettrait d’enregistrer la pression minimale de chaque niveau de capteurs et devrait corriger cette zone de haute pression parfois persistante lors la déglutition. Ainsi, les objectifs de ce travail étaient: 1) de décrire la morphologie de la JOG au repos en tant que barrière antireflux, en comparant les mesures effectuées avec la 3D-HRM en temps réel, par rapport à celle simulées lors d’une manœuvre de « pull-through » et de déterminer quelles sont les signatures des pressions attribuables au SOI et au diaphragme; 2) d’évaluer la relaxation de la JOG pendant la déglutition en testant l'hypothèse selon laquelle la 3D-HRM permet le développement d’un nouveau paradigme (appelé « 3D eSleeve ») pour le calcul de l’IRP, fondé sur l’utilisation de la pression radiale minimale à chaque niveau de capteur de pression le long de la JOG. Ce nouveau paradigme sera comparé à une étude de transit en vidéofluoroscopie pour évaluer le gradient de pression à travers la JOG. Méthodes : Nous avons utilisé un cathéter 3D-HRM, qui incorpore un segment dit « 3D » de 9 cm au sein d’un cathéter HRM par ailleurs standard. Le segment 3D est composé de 12 niveaux (espacés de 7.5mm) de 8 capteurs de pression disposés radialement, soit un total de 96 capteurs. Neuf volontaires ont été étudiés au repos, où des enregistrements ont été effectués en temps réel et pendant une manœuvre de « pull-through » du segment 3D (mobilisation successive du cathéter de 5 mm, pour que le segment 3D se déplace le long de la JOG). Les mesures de la longueur du SOI et la détermination du RIP ont été réalisées. La longueur de la JOG a été mesurée lors du « pull-through » en utilisant 4 capteurs du segment 3D dispersés radialement et les marges de la JOG ont été définies par une augmentation de la pression de 2 mmHg par rapport à la pression gastrique ou de l’œsophage. Pour le calcul en temps réel, les limites distale et proximale de la JOG ont été définies par une augmentation de pression circonférentielle de 2 mmHg par rapport à la pression de l'estomac. Le RIP a été déterminée, A) dans le mode de tracé conventionnel avec la méthode du « pull-through » [le RIP est la valeur moyenne de 4 mesures] et B) en position fixe, dans le mode de représentation topographique de la pression de l’œsophage, en utilisant l’outil logiciel pour déterminer le point d'inversion de la pression (PIP). Pour l'étude de la relaxation de la JOG lors de la déglutition, 25 volontaires ont été étudiés et ont subi 3 études de manométrie (10 déglutitions de 5ml d’eau) en position couchée avec un cathéter HRM standard et un cathéter 3D-HRM. Avec la 3D-HRM, l’analyse a été effectuée une fois avec le segment 3D et une fois avec une partie non 3D du cathéter (capteurs standard de HRM). Ainsi, pour chaque individu, l'IRP a été calculée de quatre façons: 1) avec la méthode conventionnelle en utilisant le cathéter HRM standard, 2) avec la méthode conventionnelle en utilisant le segment standard du cathéter 3D-HRM, 3) avec la méthode conventionnelle en utilisant le segment « 3D » du cathéter 3D-HRM, et 4) avec le nouveau paradigme (3D eSleeve) qui recueille la pression minimale de chaque niveau de capteurs (segment 3D). Quatorze autres sujets ont subi une vidéofluoroscopie simultanée à l’étude de manométrie avec le cathéter 3D-HRM. Les données de pression ont été exportés vers MATLAB ™ et quatre pressions ont été mesurées simultanément : 1) la pression du corps de l’œsophage, 2cm au-dessus de la JOG, 2) la pression intragastrique, 3) la pression radiale moyenne de la JOG (pression du eSleeve) et 4) la pression de la JOG en utilisant la pression minimale de chaque niveau de capteurs (pression du 3D eSleeve). Ces données ont permis de déterminer le temps permissif d'écoulement du bolus (FPT), caractérisé par la période au cours de laquelle un gradient de pression existe à travers la JOG (pression œsophagienne > pression de relaxation de la JOG > pression gastrique). La présence ou l'absence du bolus en vidéofluoroscopie et le FPT ont été codés avec des valeurs dichotomiques pour chaque période de 0,1 s. Nous avons alors calculé la sensibilité et la spécificité correspondant à la valeur du FPT pour la pression du eSleeve et pour la pression du 3D eSleeve, avec la vidéofluoroscopie pour référence. Résultats : Les enregistrements avec la 3D-HRM laissent suggérer que la longueur du sphincter évaluée avec la méthode du « pull-through » était grandement exagéré en incorporant dans la mesure du SOI les signaux de pression extrinsèques à l’œsophage, asymétriques et attribuables aux piliers du diaphragme et aux structures vasculaires. L’enregistrement en temps réel a permis de constater que les principaux constituants de la pression de la JOG au repos étaient attribuables au diaphragme. L’IRP calculé avec le nouveau paradigme 3D eSleeve était significativement inférieur à tous les autres calculs d'IRP avec une limite supérieure de la normale de 12 mmHg contre 17 mmHg pour l’IRP calculé avec la HRM standard. La sensibilité (0,78) et la spécificité (0,88) du 3D eSleeve étaient meilleurs que le eSleeve standard (0,55 et 0,85 respectivement) pour prédire le FPT par rapport à la vidéofluoroscopie. Discussion et conclusion : Nos observations suggèrent que la 3D-HRM permet l'enregistrement en temps réel des attributs de la JOG, facilitant l'analyse des constituants responsables de sa fonction au repos en tant que barrière antireflux. La résolution spatiale axiale et radiale du segment « 3D » pourrait permettre de poursuivre cette étude pour quantifier les signaux de pression de la JOG attribuable au SOI et aux structures extrinsèques (diaphragme et artéfacts vasculaires). Ces attributs du cathéter 3D-HRM suggèrent qu'il s'agit d'un nouvel outil prometteur pour l'étude de la physiopathologie du RGO. Au cours de la déglutition, nous avons évalué la faisabilité d’améliorer la mesure de l’IRP en utilisant ce nouveau cathéter de manométrie 3D avec un nouveau paradigme (3D eSleeve) basé sur l’utilisation de la pression radiale minimale à chaque niveau de capteurs de pression. Nos résultats suggèrent que cette approche est plus précise que celle de la manométrie haute résolution standard. La 3D-HRM devrait certainement améliorer la précision des mesures de relaxation de la JOG et cela devrait avoir un impact sur la recherche pour modéliser la JOG au cours de la déglutition et dans le RGO. / Background & Aims: Conventional water-perfused manometry and high resolution manometry permitted the development of a variety of manometric methodologies and metrics to understand the motility of the esophagus and to quantify esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics. However, the anatomy in the area of the EGJ is complex and intraluminal manometry recordings detect pressure signals referable both to intrinsic esophageal structures and to adjacent extrinsic structures impinging on the esophagus. Both have distinct sphincteric mechanisms within the EGJ. The dominant pressure signals detected near the EGJ are attributable to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the crural diaphragm (CD). However, neither of these technologies were able to distinguish between the different components of the EGJ. When analyzing EGJ characteristics as a reflection of its competence against reflux, the more widely used manometric parameters are the EGJ length and the respiratory inversion point (RIP), defined as the location at which inspiratory pressure deflections change from positive (abdomen) to negative (chest). However, the significance of these metrics has not gained wide acceptance in the gastroenterology community as evident in a recent American Gastroenterology Association Institute (AGAI) Position Statement (1) concluding that ‘The current role of manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is to exclude motor disorders as a cause of the continued symptoms’. During deglutition, the objective quantitative measurement of EGJ relaxation, the integrative relaxation pressure (IRP), permits one to distinguish between normal and abnormal EGJ relaxation. However, comparison between spatial pressure variation plots and relaxation pressures derived from circumferentially averaged pressures suggest a persistent high pressure at the hiatal center during a period that flow is known to be occurring whereas this was not seen using nadir radial pressure data. Recently, a 3D-high resolution manometry (3D-HRM) assembly (Given Imaging, Duluth, GA) has been developed with the potential to simplify the assessment of EGJ pressure morphology and physiology. The 3D segment of the array permits high resolution recording both axially and radially while maintaining a stationary sensor position. Consequently, 3D-HRM should allow for the measurement of important EGJ parameters such as length and RIP. Data extracted from the 3D-HRM recording may also allow differentiating pressure signals within the EGJ attributable to the intrinsic sphincter and to the surrounding elements. Moreover, 3D-HRM preserves the individual pressure values of each radially dispersed sensor within the array, permitting one to overcome the apparent persistent high pressure during the deglutitive relaxation. Thus, the aims of this work were 1) to describe the EGJ pressure morphology at rest, comparing measures made with real time 3D-HRM to simulations of a conventional pull-through protocol and to define the pressure signatures attributable to the diaphragmatic and LES pressure components within the 3D-HRM recording; 2) to assess deglutitive EGJ relaxation by testing the hypothesis that the 3D-HRM array using an analysis paradigm based on finding the minimal radial pressure at each axial level (3D-eSleeve) should provide a representation of the luminal pressure gradient across the EGJ that is more relevant to predicting periods of trans-sphincteric flow using barium transit on fluoroscopy as the comparator. We also sought to adapt the IRP metric to the 3D-HRM array using the 3D-eSleeve principle (3D-IRP) and compare normative values obtained with this new paradigm to standard IRP calculations. Methods: Patients were studied with a 3D-HRM assembly. The 3D-HRM assembly incorporated a 9 cm 3D-HRM segment into an otherwise standard HRM assembly; the 3D segment was comprised of 12 rings of 8 radially dispersed independent pressure sensors, spaced 7.5mm apart. At rest, 9 volunteers were studied and recordings were done during a station pull-through of the 3D-HRM segment withdrawing it across the EGJ at 5 mm increments with each position held for 30s (sufficient to capture several respiratory cycles). Conventional measures of ‘LES length’ were made using 4 radially dispersed sensors within the 3D-HRM array, defining the margins of the sphincter by a 2 mmHg pressure increase relative to gastric or esophageal pressure. In the 3D-HRM, the proximal and distal limits of the EGJ were defined as the axial locations first detecting a 360° circumferential pressure increase of 2 mmHg relative to the stomach. RIP was determined, A) in the tracing mode: using the pull-through of 4 single sensors spaced 7.5 mm apart [RIP is the average value of 4 radially dispersed sensors] and B) in a stationary position using the software pressure inversion point (PIP) tool. In the esophageal pressure topography (EPT) mode, the tracing changed progressively from a thoracic pattern to an abdominal pattern, and the RIP was localized within the inversion zone with the PIP tool tracing. For the study of the EGJ deglutitive relaxation, 25 volunteers underwent 3 consecutive 10-swallows protocols of 5 ml of water in the supine position with both the standard (once) and 3D-HRM (twice) devices in random sequence. During the 3D-HRM studies, the EGJ was measured once with the 3D-sleeve segment and once with a proximal (non-3D sleeve portion) of the device incorporating standard HRM sensors. For each subject, the IRP was calculated in four ways: 1) conventional method with the standard HRM device, 2) conventional method with a standard HRM segment of the 3D-HRM device, 3) conventional method using the 3D-HRM sleeve segment, and 4) a novel 3D-HRM eSleeve paradigm (3D-IRP) localizing the radial pressure minimum at each locus along the eSleeve. Fourteen additional subjects then underwent synchronized simultaneous videofluoroscopy and 3D-HRM (including two 5-ml barium swallows). Pressure data were exported to MATLAB™ and four pressures were measured simultaneously: 1) esophageal body pressure 2cm above EGJ, 2) intragastric pressure, 3) radially average eSleeve pressure and 4) 3D-eSleeve pressure. Data were plotted to determine the flow permissive time (FPT) characterized as periods during which a pressure gradient through the EGJ is present (esophageal pressure > EGJ relaxation pressure (radial average or 3D-eSleeve paradigm) > gastric pressure). FPT was calculated during a 10s time window after upper sphincter relaxation. The presence or absence of bolus transit or FPT was coded with dichotomous values for each 0.1 s. We calculated the corresponding sensitivity and specificity for both radial average and 3D-eSleeve analyses of FPT with bolus transit evident on fluoroscopy being the reference. Results: 3D-HRM recordings suggested that sphincter length assessed by a pull-through method greatly exaggerated the estimate of LES length by failing to discriminate among circumferential contractile pressure and asymmetric extrinsic pressure signals attributable to diaphragmatic and vascular structures. Real-time 3D EGJ recordings found that the dominant constituents of EGJ pressure at rest were attributable to the diaphragm. The 3D-IRP was significantly less than all other calculations of IRP with the upper limit of normal being 12 mmHg vs. 17 mmHg for the standard IRP. The sensitivity (0.78) and the specificity (0.88) of the 3D-eSleeve were also better than the standard eSleeve (0.55 and 0.85, respectively) for predicting flow permissive time verified fluoroscopically. Discussion & Conclusion: Our observations suggest that the 3D-HRM permits real-time recording of EGJ pressure morphology facilitating analysis of the EGJ constituents responsible for its function as a reflux barrier at rest. The axial and radial spatial resolution of the 9 cm 3D-HRM segment may permit further studies to differentiate pressure signals within the EGJ attributable to the LES and to extrinsic structures (diaphragm and vascular artifacts). These attributes of the 3D-HRM device suggest it to be a promising new tool in the study of GERD pathophysiology. During deglutition, we evaluated the feasibility of improving the measurement of IRP utilizing a novel 3D-HRM assembly and a novel 3D-eSleeve concept based on finding the axial maximum of the radial minimum pressures at each sensor ring along the sleeve segment. Our findings suggest that this approach is more accurate than standard HRM and other methods that utilize a radially averaged pressure within the EGJ. Although we can only speculate on how much this will improve clinical management, 3D-HRM will certainly improve the accuracy of EGJ relaxation measurements and this will certainly impact research endeavors focused on modeling EGJ function during swallowing and reflux.

The aim of this thesis is to present a complex information about the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to further elucidate the function of the diaphragm as the external esophageal sphincter and as a part of the antireflux barrier in patients with GERD. The study included 87 patients with verified GERD. Patients were subjected to a set of postural and respiratory maneuvers - caudal position of chest, abdominal breathing and measuring of the maximal respiratory pressures, all performed on the basis of tolerance to position and maneuver. The high-resolution manometry (HRM) was chosen to record the changes in pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter and for the measurement of respiratory pressures was used the spirometric system MasterScope. It was found that postural and respiratory maneuvers, that activate the diaphragm, increase the pressure in the EGJ. The most significant increase occurred during the maximal inspiratory maneuver, which increased LES pressure up to 261.2 %. The results also show that patients with GERD have reduced the strength of respiratory muscles, especially inspirational muscles. Reaching only 66.5 % of predicted PImax. We have demonstrated that patients with GERD have significantly lower diaphragm muscle strength, what...

Introduction The main aim of this study is to present a complex review comprising etiological factors, diagnostic options and therapeutic methods related to globus pharyngeus, a persistent or intermittent sensation of a lump or foreign body in the throat. The second purpose is to investigate the reciprocal relationship between motor control with musculoskeletal system and pressure changes in the esophagus, especially in the upper esophageal sphincter. Methods 37 patients participated in the study. 24 of them suffered globus pharyngeus and 13 were patients with GERD but without the symptoms of globus pharyngeus. Because of the complex physiology of esophageal function and the inability of conventional manometry to fully describe this complexity, we found High-Resolution Manometry as a useful device for accomlishing the referred task. Patients were examined in four different postural situations which had to be modified when the attitude wasn't tolerated. The examination was followed by manual physiotherapy and exercises targeted to influence postural alignment. 10 patients with globus pharyngeus who agreed with a control manometry examination were familiarized with the results as a form of biofeedback. Results On the basis of the results of this research, it can be concluded that a high pressure...

O objetivo foi evidenciar a presença do espaço intercelular dilatado do epitélio esofágico após a infusão de ácido clorídrico (HCl) à 0,1N comparando com a infusão de soro fisiológico (SF) em pacientes sem sintomas típicos da DRGE com mucosa esofágica normal e compará-los com os de sintomas típicos e esofagite erosiva. Foram entrevistados e realizaram o exame de endoscopia digestiva alta 60 pacientes destes, 29 foram incluídos no estudo sendo 18 com esôfago normal (9 foram infundidos SF e 9 HCl) e 11 com esofagite erosiva (6 foram infundidos SF e 5 HCl) e foram realizados 4 biópsias da mucosa esofágica (2 antes e 2 depois das infusões). Não foi encontrado diferença estatisticamente significante no espaço intercelular da mucosa esofágica dos pacientes com e sem esofagite erosiva com ácido clorídrico ou soro fisiológico não sendo um marcador da DRGE / The purpose was to prove the presence of extended intercellular space of the esophagic epithelium after chloridric acid infusion (HCI) to 0,1N comparing to the physiologic serum infusion (PS) in patients without typical symptoms of DGER with normal esophagic mucous membrane and compare them to ones with typical symptoms and erosive esophagitis. 60 patients were interviewed and took the high digestive endoscopy; 29 were included in the research, among them 18 with normal esophagus (9 were infused PS, and 9 HCI) and 11 with erosive esophagitis (6 were infused PS and 5 HCI); 4 biopsies of esophagic mucous membrane were made (2 before and 2 after infusions). It was not found any statistically meaningful difference in intercellular space of esophagic mucous membrane in patients with or without erosive esophagitis with chloridric acid or physiologic serum, and thus it is not a DGER

Objetivos: A FCL é um novo padrão de doença intersticial pulmonar idiopática associado ao refluxo gastro-esofágico. Nós investigamos sua presença na ES com envolvimento pulmonar. Métodos: 28 pacientes com ES foram submetidos à biópsia pulmonar a céu aberto. As amostras foram classificadas conforme o novo consenso de classificação das pneumonias intersticiais idiopáticas e de acordo com os critérios do padrão FCL. Tomografia computadorizada de alta resolução (TCAR) de tórax, prova de função pulmonar (PFP), esofagograma de contraste e/ou endoscopia digestiva alta também foram realizadas. Resultados: Na ES, o padrão NSIP (67,8%) e a FCL (75%) foram os padrões mais freqüentemente encontrados e na maioria dos casos, eles co-existiam. Todos, exceto um paciente com FCL tinha a característica distribuição broncocêntrica das lesões, sendo mais extensa nos casos com FCL isolada (p=0,001). Da mesma forma, o conteúdo basofílico foi mais freqüente nos pacientes com FCL e completamente ausente no grupo NSIP (p<0,001). Na TCAR, a distribuição central do envolvimento pulmonar foi o achado mais prevalente nos pacientes com FCL isolada (57,14%) contrastando com a 10 predominância do padrão periférico nos outros grupos (p=0,02). Além disso, uma tendência quanto à distribuição segmentar na TCAR foi observada no grupo com FCL isolada (85,71%) e FCL+NSIP (71,43%), enquanto que 80% dos pacientes com NSIP tinham uma distribuição difusa das lesões pulmonares (p=0,08). Anormalidades esofágicas foram um achado quase universal. Conclusão: Está é a primeira descrição de fibrose centrilobular em pacientes com ES e envolvimento pulmonar. Este padrão tem características histológicas e tomográficas distintas e a identificação deste subgrupo de pacientes irá certamente contribuir para uma melhor abordagem terapêutica. / Objectives: CLF is a new histological pattern of idiopathic ILD associated to esophageal reflux. We have investigated its presence in SSc with lung involvement. Methods: 28 SSc patients were submitted to open lung biopsy. The specimens were classified according to the new consensus classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and to the diagnostic criteria for CLF. High Resolution Computer Tomography (HRCT), Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), contrast esophagogram and/or upper digestive endoscopy were also performed. Main Results: In SSc, the NSIP (67.8%) and the centrilobular (75%) patterns were the most frequent and in the majority of the cases, they co-existed. All, except one patient with CLF had the characteristic bronchocentric distribution and this lesion was more extensive in those with isolated CLF (p=0.01). Likewise, the basophilic content was more frequent in patients with CLF and completely absent in NSIP group (p<0.001). The central distribution of lung involvement on HRCT was the most prevalent finding in patients with isolated CLF (57.14%) contrasting with the predominant peripheral pattern in the other groups (p=0.02). Moreover, a trend towards a patchy distribution on HRCT was observed for CLF group (85.71%) and CLF+NSIP group (71.43%) whereas 80% of the NSIP group had diffuse distribution (p=0.08). Esophageal abnormalities were almost a universal finding. Conclusions: This is the first report of centrilobular fibrosis in SSc patients with lung involvement. This new pattern has distinct histological and tomographic features. The identification of this subgroup of patients will certainly contribute for a more appropriate therapeutic approach.