Since the 1960s, international aid organizations and governments have invested millions of dollars in promoting aquaculture as a way to stimulate local economies and improve food security. India is one such country, incorporating aquaculture research and extension programs as part of their development plans as early as 1971. India’s aquaculture promotion efforts gained momentum in 2004, following the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004. The government sees aquaculture as a post-disaster development tool and a method to increase community resilience in rural areas of India. Aquaculture currently constitutes nearly half of global seafood production today. Due to this importance, and the attention such practices receive through funding and extension, many scholars have focused on the social impacts that aquaculture practices have on rural communities. In particular, scholars have investigated the effects of aquaculture on environmental conditions, food security, livelihoods, gender relations, and social conflict. However, more scholarship is needed concerning the historical legacies that have contributed to how aquaculture is promoted and practiced, particularly connections to the Green Revolution. Furthermore, there needs to be more research about commercial aquaculture as a post-disaster development strategy. My research – based on 9 months of ethnographic fieldwork and archival analysis in Tamil Nadu, India – contributes to this body of literature. I synthesized post-development theory with that of environmental risk and vulnerability, building upon the work of scholars such as James Ferguson, Tania Li, and Piers Blaikie. My analysis uncovers large disparities between the goals of aquaculture development programs and actual aquaculture outcomes. I attribute this to the technocratic governance structure of the aquaculture industry, which leads to a lack of engagement and participation between aquaculture managers, researchers, and practitioners. This lack of engagement ultimately makes the communities in which aquaculture is being practiced more vulnerable to anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Additionally, I found that aquaculture practices in the study site are causing significant changes to local agrarian structures, particularly through changes to labor. These changes have implications for social stratification and disempowerment of women. Overall, these findings contribute to the anthropological study of aquaculture as well as to theories of post-development.

L’île de Java fait partie des régions les plus densément peuplées du monde. Lors de la seconde moitié du vingtième siècle, le gouvernement indonésien a instauré des politiques de transmigrations visant à décongestionner démographiquement l’île-maîtresse. Mais les objectifs de ce programme étaient multiples, visant notamment à fournir la main d’œuvre agricole, à bas prix, aux agro-industries afin de les inciter à s’installer dans les îles de la périphérie javanaise. La transition agraire a valorisé l’implantation de l’agriculture intensive à grande échelle. Ceci a contribué à l’exclusion progressive des paysans Javanais au sein des systèmes de production agricole, engendrant un changement de valeurs et d'aspirations au sein des communautés rurales. La transition agraire a ainsi contribué à accentuer la désagrarianisation des communautés rurales javanaises, se traduisant en un immense surplus de main-d’œuvre dans les campagnes suite à la révolution verte qui a été entamée au cours de la décennie 1970. L’émergence d’un noyau d’entrepreneurs et les migrations de travailleurs sont au cœur des stratégies de résilience économique développées par les paysans javanais pour faire face aux impacts de la transition agraire. Les rapatriements de fonds qui découlent des migrations contribuent à la survie de certaines communautés rurales, dans lesquelles de nombreux membres passent le plus clair de leur temps à l’extérieur du village. / Java island is part of the most densely populated regions of the world. During the second half of the twentieth century, the Indonesian government established transmigration policies aiming to lower the demographic pressure on the main island. But the intentions behind those policies were various, including the aim to provide cheap labor for the agribusiness to encourage their settlement on the islands surrounding Java. The agrarian transition valued the establishment of large scale intensive agriculture. This contributed to the progressive exclusion of javanese peasants in agricultural production systems, generating a change of values and aspirations inside rural communities. The agrarian transition thus contributed to emphasize the deagrarianization of javanese rural communities, engendering a great surplus of labor on the countryside following the green revolution which took place in the 1970’s. The emergence of entrepreneurship and the migration of workers are amongst the economic resilience strategies developed by javanese peasants to cope with the impacts of the agrarian transition. Remittances resulting from those migrations contribute to the survival of multiple rural communities, in which many members spend most of their time outside the village.

L’objet de cette thèse est d’analyser l’évolution du système de vulgarisation agricole en contexte méditerranéen, en termes d’organisation, de dimensions du conseil et de méthodes d’intervention à partir d’une analyse régionale des systèmes syrien et tunisien. Cette évolution répond à des changements profonds du modèle de production agricole, basé historiquement sur les principes de la Révolution verte, qui s’oriente vers des modèles agro-écologiques. Nous nous situons dans le mouvement dit de la « transition agroécologique », qui propose un cadre de développement associant les dimensions socioéconomiques et environnementales. Elle permet d'envisager une meilleure intégration de l'agriculture et de ses enjeux dans le projet de développement territorial. Concevoir et mettre en œuvre cette approche nécessite de changer profondément la gestion des systèmes de production. Pour assurer ces changements, les agriculteurs ont besoin de nouveaux dispositifs d’accompagnement. L’analyse de l’évolution des systèmes de vulgarisation est conduite à partir d’un cadre théorique et méthodologique construit en référence aux théories du développement, notamment évolutionniste, pour tenir compte des forces générales qui déterminent les actions locales, et historiciste, pour donner place aux trajectoires de développement et aux combinaisons territoriales singulières. Ce cadre suppose que le développement ne dépend pas de producteurs prêts à adopter des innovations exogènes mais plutôt à participer à son élaboration. Cette participation répond à deux besoins : i) l’adaptation de l’innovation à la particularité des situations comme la transition agroécologique le préconise, ii) la décentralisation de la gestion des biens socio-environnementaux, vers des formes de communs. Face à ces enjeux de transformation des systèmes agricoles, on peut s’attendre à ce que l’organisation de la vulgarisation agricole s’est adaptée par le passage d’un système piloté principalement par un dispositif public, basé sur une seule dimension de conseil technique et sur des méthodes diffusionnistes de vulgarisation de masse, à un système composite proposant plusieurs dimensions de conseil et de méthodes d’intervention individuelles ou communes basées sur la co-construction du conseil. L’analyse est conduite en prenant appui sur un travail empirique adapté à la situation des deux pays d’étude, circonscrit sur la région d’Al Ghâb en Syrie et de Nabeul en Tunisie. Les résultats sont assez proches dans les deux pays où l’évolution du secteur agricole se réalise par petites touches qui tiennent plus de la substitution de pratiques plus économes et plus respectueuses du milieu que les précédentes, mais elle n’a pas été accompagnée par une évolution marquante du système de vulgarisation agricole. Le dispositif étatique occupe toujours une position de monopole en Al Ghâb, et dominante à Nabeul. L’évolution organisationnelle de ce système se borne, dans les deux régions, à la déconcentration des services, avec une timide privatisation sur le terrain de Nabeul. Dans les deux régions d’études, le dispositif étatique utilise classiquement des méthodes collectives de conseil basées sur le modèle « Training and Visit » et se limite à une dimension technique basée principalement sur les recettes de la Révolution verte ; leur contribution à l’évolution des pratiques agricoles vers l’agroécologie n’est pas notable. / The aim of this dissertation is to analyze the evolution of the agricultural extension system in a Mediterranean context, in terms of organization, types of advice and methods of intervention drawn from a regional analysis of Syrian and Tunisian systems. This evolution responds to profound changes in the agricultural production model, historically based on the principles of the Green Revolution, which is evolving towards agro-ecological models. We situate this work in the movement known as the "agro-ecological transition", which proposes a framework of development associating socio-economic and environmental dimensions. This movement allows us to envision a better integration of agriculture and its stakes in the territorial development project. To design and implement the agro-ecological approach requires a profound change in the management of production systems. To ensure these changes, farmers need new support schemes. The analysis of the evolution of the extension systems is conducted from a theoretical and methodological framework constructed with reference to development theories, notably especially evolutionist, which take into account the general forces that determine local actions, and historicist, which give pace to development trajectories and singular territorial combinations. This framework assumes that the development does not depend on producers willing to adopt exogenous innovations but rather to participate in its elaboration. This participation meets two needs: i) the adaptation of innovation to the particularity of situations as the agroecological transition advocates ii) the decentralization of the management of socio-environmental goods, towards common forms. To deal with these challenges of transforming agricultural systems, we can be expected that the organization of agricultural extension has adapted by the passage of a system driven primarily by a public device, based on a single type of technical advice and on diffusionist methods of mass of extension, to a composite system offering several types of advice and individual or joint intervention methods based on the co-construction of the advice. Our analysis is based on an empirical work adapted to the situation of the two countries under study, circumscribed to the regions of Al Ghâb in Syria and Nabeul in Tunisia. The results are quite similar in both countries where the evolution of the agricultural sector occurs through small changes that rely more on the substitution of practices more economical and more respectful of the environment than previous practices, but these changes have not been accompanied by a significant evolution of the agricultural extension system. The state apparatus still occupies a monopoly position in Al Ghâb, and dominant in Nabeul. The organizational evolution of this system is limited, in both regions, to the deconcentration of services, with a timid privatization on the site of Nabeul. In both regions of study, the state apparatus uses classically collective counseling methods of advice based on the "Training and Visit" model, and is limited to a technical dimension based mainly on the proceeds of the Green Revolution, their contribution to the evolution of agricultural practices towards agroecology is not notable.

Le problème de l’accès aux ressources génétiques des plantes pour la sélection variétale est au cœur de la Révolution Verte. A partir des années 1960, les sélectionneurs font de la disparition des variétés locales sous l’effet de la diffusion de nouvelles variétés génétiquement homogènes un problème public à l’échelle mondiale. Dans une perspective qui croise la recherche d’archives et l’enquête de terrain, cette thèse revient sur la formation de ce problème, sur sa trajectoire historique et ses enjeux actuels. Il s’agit d’analyser l’hétérogénéité des savoirs scientifiques et des approches qui sont développés sur le thème de la conservation des ressources génétiques dans les arènes internationales. L’étude des débats et des initiatives menés dans le cadre de la FAO permet de comprendre quels sont les savoirs légitimés, lesquels sont marginalisés et comment la nature et les contours du problème ont été négociés. La place que les ressources génétiques occupent au cours d’épisodes clés de la Révolution Verte est également au cœur de ce travail. Cette thèse analyse spécifiquement l’importance accordée aux variétés locales de maïs dans le programme agricole que la Fondation Rockefeller met en place au Mexique à partir de 1943. Alors que le maïs hybride est généralement présenté comme un vecteur de la modernisation agricole, cette thèse montre que les experts sont confrontés à l’échec du paradigme d’amélioration variétale qu’ils étaient censés exporter. Face à une innovation uniquement applicable à une échelle très limitée, les semences paysannes du maïs restent l’option variétale la plus utilisée au Mexique. Ce travail montre que ce sont bien les choix pragmatiques des agriculteurs qui constituent le fondement de la conservation, de facto, des ressources génétiques du maïs dans ce pays. / The issue of access to plant genetic resources for plant breeding is at the heart of the Green Revolution. Beginning in the 1960s, the disappearance of local varieties with the spread of new genetically homogeneous varieties evolved into a public problem on a global scale. Combining archival research and field investigations, this thesis explores the emergence of this problem, its historical trajectory, and its current forms. I analyze the heterogeneity of scientific knowledge and approaches to the conservation of genetic resources developed in international arenas. An exploration of debates and initiatives within the framework of the FAO sheds light on the issues of which knowledges are legitimated and which marginalized, and on how the nature and outlines of the problem have been negotiated. An examination of the role of genetic resources in key episodes in the Green Revolution is also central to the study. The thesis specifically analyzes the importance attributed to local maize varieties in the agricultural program that the Rockefeller Foundation implemented in Mexico beginning in 1943. While hybrid maize is generally presented as a vector of agricultural modernization, this thesis shows how experts were faced with the failure of the varietal improvement paradigm that they were supposed to export. As hybrid maize is an innovation that is only applicable on a very limited scale, farmers’ maize seeds still are the most widely used varietal option in Mexico. The study shows that it is indeed the pragmatic choices of farmers that form the basis for the de facto conservation of the country’s maize genetic resources.

Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-08-17T17:27:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Mariana Santarelli.pdf: 1431315 bytes, checksum: 95871c5e25a13c74e478b613532c15ac (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-17T17:27:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Mariana Santarelli.pdf: 1431315 bytes, checksum: 95871c5e25a13c74e478b613532c15ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-18 / CNPq / Between 2003 and 2011 Brazil experienced a time of significant expansion of its International Development Cooperation, influenced by changes of the foreign policy towards South-South relations. ProSavana, a trilateral cooperation project between the governments of Brazil, Mozambique and Japan, arises in this context, in order to support the rural development of the Nacala Corridor region in Mozambique. The program is perceived in the thesis as an attempt to assemble a new alliance to respond to an international call for a new phase of what is known as the Long Green Revolution in Africa. A network of actors and interests originated from a previous Japanese-Brazilian partnership focused on the consolidation of agricultural and mineral commodities chains, in which Brazil originally assumed a role in the transmission of rural development views and technologies, in order to reproduce in the Mozambican Savannah a model already tested in the Brazilian Cerrado. By tracing the associations between the various actors and interests, the study shows how narratives about ProSavana are produced and sustained, and how the main controversies and disjunctions emerge. The Program goes through a reframing process, it seeks to dissociate itself from denounces of Land Grab, at the same time that strategies are redefined in order to change the focus of the Program for the integration of small farmers to commercial agriculture. In this process Brazilian actors lose relevance, which raises the central question answer at the conclusion of this thesis: Why the proposal of transferring development visions and public policies, which featured the emergent Brazilian South South cooperation, did not sustain itself in ProSavana design? This issue is raised to the reflection upon the obstacles and possibilities of the diffusion of Brazilian public policies for agriculture and food and nutrition security as a reference of South-South cooperation with African countries, in a local and global context, of disputes over development paradigms and strategies to guarantee food rights. / Entre 2003 e 2011, o Brasil viveu um momento de significativa expans?o de sua Coopera??o Internacional para o Desenvolvimento ? CID, influenciado pelo deslocamento do eixo da pol?tica externa brasileira para as rela??es Sul-Sul. O ProSavana, um projeto de coopera??o trilateral entre os governos do Brasil, Mo?ambique e Jap?o, surgiu nesse contexto, com o objetivo de apoiar o desenvolvimento rural da regi?o do Corredor de Nacala, em Mo?ambique. O Programa ? percebido nesta tese como uma tentativa de composi??o de mais uma alian?a organizada para responder ao chamado internacional por uma nova etapa da Longa Revolu??o Verde na ?frica. Uma rede de atores e interesses que encontra suas origens em uma antiga parceria nipo-brasileira voltada para a consolida??o de cadeias de commodities agr?colas e minerais, na qual o Brasil assumiu originalmente o papel de transmissor de uma determinada vis?o e de tecnologias de desenvolvimento rural, com o objetivo de reproduzir na Savana mo?ambicana um modelo j? testado no Cerrado brasileiro. A partir do rastreamento das associa??es existentes entre os diversos atores e interesses, este estudo mostra como s?o produzidas e sustentadas as principais narrativas sobre o ProSavana, e como despontam as principais controv?rsias e disjun??es. Observa-se nesta tese que o Programa passa por um processo de ressignifica??o, em que busca se dissociar da den?ncia de usurpa??o de terras (LandGrab), ao mesmo tempo em que s?o redesenhadas as estrat?gias, de forma a alterar o foco do Programa para a integra??o dos pequenos produtores ? agricultura comercial. Nesse processo, os atores brasileiros perdem relev?ncia, o que suscita a quest?o central que a conclus?o desta tese busca responder: por que a perspectiva de transfer?ncia de vis?es de desenvolvimento e pol?ticas p?blicas, que caracteriza a emergente CSS brasileira, n?o se sustenta no desenho do ProSavana? Essa quest?o ? trazida ? tona como forma de iluminar a reflex?o sobre os entraves e as possibilidades da difus?o das pol?ticas brasileiras para a agricultura e a seguran?a alimentar e nutricional enquanto refer?ncias de coopera??o Sul-Sul para os pa?ses africanos, em um contexto local e global de disputa de paradigmas sobre perspectivas de desenvolvimento e formas de garantia do direito humano ? alimenta??o.

The main objective of my dissertation is to analyze and compare the socio-ecological implications of the adoption of genetically modified (GM) seeds and alternative agroecological farming methods for farming communities in Alberta, Canada and Andhra Pradesh, India localities situated in contrasting geopolitical, socio-cultural, and structural-institutional contexts in the global economy. For this research, the adoption of GM canola in Alberta and GM cotton in Andhra Pradesh are used as comparative case studies to explore the qualitative impact of agricultural biotechnology on farming communities. Many studies have examined the potential impact of GM crops, but few have looked beyond economic cost-benefit analysis. In this dissertation, I examine social and cultural aspects of farmer decision-making in the adoption of the new seed technology, farmer receptivity to new cropping methods, knowledge translation between laboratory and farmer, and the impact of global knowledge-based technology on local knowledge systems, socio-cultural practices, the nature-society relationship, and gender relations. I use a global ethnography methodology and draw on a series of field interviews with farmers to provide sociological insight into how global processes of the Gene Revolution impact different farming communities in different localities in the world-economy. In this dissertation I argue that the debate about the new agricultural technologies (e.g. GM seeds), the environment and agrarian crises should not be narrowed to the question of new technologies per se. Rather it should be understood from an agrarian political ecology perspective articulating political economy (neoliberal governance at global, national and provincial levels, and the processes of dispossession of primary agricultural producers from their means and conditions of production), socio-cultural systems (the construction of hegemonic discourse about genetically modified organisms, agricultural deskilling, gender relations), and ecosystems (a process of mastering nature, monoculturization, environmental risks, metabolic rift) in the context of neoliberal globalization. My fieldwork study of the Gene Revolution provides closer, more fine-grained research and analysis of its impacts with sensitivity to local class and status, gender and cultural issues, and the ways in which farmers technology adoption decisions can dramatically alter overall quality of life, local knowledge systems, community development, the sustainability of agriculture and the ecosystem itself.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.