A conservação do patrimônio urbano encontra, nesta tese, aspectos de sua gênese legal na Itália. Abordam-se, em diálogo com a historiografia dedicada à obra de Gustavo Giovanonni, as importantes contribuições desse influente engenheiro para a introdução do conceito de \"ambiente\" nas leis de proteção do patrimônio cultural desse país no período entreguerras, inclusive aquelas voltadas para as chamadas \"belezas naturais e panorâmicas\". Com a interpretação de ideias e expressões utilizadas por Giovannoni, como \"ambiente do monumento\", \"ambiente tradicional dos lugares\" e \"complexo de coisas imóveis que compõem um característico aspecto com valor estético e tradicional\", evidencia-se ter sido ele um agente central à ampliação da tutela no seu país, para além daquela voltada ao \"monumento\" isolado, assim como para a introdução, na legislação, de instrumentos importantes para o campo da conservação urbana, como a figura do \"plano\". Nesse processo, identifica-se grande coerência entre a atuação do Giovannoni consultor ministerial e a do Giovannoni idealizador de leis, assim como entre o Giovannoni prático e o teórico, em campos imbricados como aqueles que hoje seriam definidos como do desenho urbano, do planejamento urbano e da conservação urbana. Intenta-se empreender uma abordagem historiográfica que contemple esse personagem, respeitando a complexidade de sua atuação. / The conservation of urban heritage finds, in this thesis, aspects of its legal genesis in Italy. Through dialogue with the historiography dedicated to the work of Gustavo Giovanonni, the thesis touches on the important contributions this influential engineer had on the introduction of the idea of \"ambiente\" in laws protecting cultural heritage in the country in the period between the first and second world wars, including those concerning so-called \"natural and panoramic beauties\". Through the interpretation of ideas and expressions used by Giovannoni, such as \"ambiente of monuments\", \"traditional ambiente of sites\" and \"the complex of immovable objects which form an appearance of aesthetic and traditional value\", we can see clearly that he was a key figure in widening the scope of protection laws in his country, taking it beyond that concerning isolated monuments as well as introducing legislation concerning important measures to be used in the area of urban conservation such as a master plan. During this process we can identify a great coherence between the work of Giovannoni as ministerial consultant and that of Giovannoni creator of laws, as well as the practical and theoretic Giovannoni in overlapping areas, such as those today defined as urban design, urban planning and urban conservation. The intention of this work is to use a historiographical approach which contemplates this man whilst respecting the complexity of his work.

nÃo hà / As discussÃes nessa narrativa tratam-se da aÃÃo educacional e do legado cultural de Gustavo Barroso para a Moderna Museologia Brasileira. Vincula-se ao grande tema da histÃria e memÃria da educaÃÃo brasileira, especialmente à histÃria e memÃria das instituiÃÃes escolares e culturais. A pesquisa busca a compreensÃo e interpretaÃÃo da aÃÃo social do sujeito Gustavo Barroso, nas distintas matÃrias da Museologia no Brasil, por meio de sua aÃÃo educacional, a partir, nomeadamente, da trÃade Museu HistÃrico Nacional (1922), Curso de Museus (1932) e Inspetoria de Monumentos Nacionais (1934), bem como de seu debate sobre folclore sertanejo, principalmente cearense, vinculado à sua proposta de museu ergolÃgico (1944). Utilizamos o conceito de modernidade sustentado nas apreciaÃÃes de Max Weber a respeito do tema. Na pesquisa recorreram-se a documentos institucionais, à revisÃo bibliogrÃfica de outros trabalhos sobre o assunto e à entrevista de ex-alunos do Curso de Museus, em que se buscava saber sobre suas memÃrias (Ricoeur) no tocante ao Curso de Museus e à sua experiÃncia de convivÃncia e/ou trabalho no MHN. O objetivo fundamental à apresentar uma interpretaÃÃo falseÃvel (Popper) de que Gustavo Barroso, a partir da trÃade retrocitada, contribuiu para a preservaÃÃo da memÃria nacional, na medida em que iniciou uma cultura de preocupaÃÃo do poder pÃblico com nossa histÃria educacional e nosso patrimÃnio cultural, ou seja, instalou-se uma nova concepÃÃo de Museologia no Brasil, justificadora de sua prÃpria visÃo de histÃria e conservadorismo. A fundaÃÃo do MHN foi em 1922, ano emblemÃtico para a HistÃria do Brasil, marcado por diversos acontecimentos polÃticos e culturais, ano que tambÃm correspondia ao centenÃrio da IndependÃncia do Brasil, em que se vivia grande crise de popularidade e aceitaÃÃo do governo de EpitÃcio Pessoa. O MHN resultou em um libelo nacionalista e ufanista, necessÃrio para clamar ao povo o amor pela naÃÃo e a salvaguarda das relÃquias das elites imperiais na jovem repÃblica, jà na condiÃÃo de repÃblica velha. Concluiu-se que o projeto museolÃgico de Gustavo Barroso teve imensurÃvel contribuiÃÃo para a formaÃÃo de uma museologia moderna no Brasil, porque inaugurou um museu exclusivamente histÃrico, o primeiro curso de museus e ainda a primeira instituiÃÃo de salvaguarda do patrimÃnio do paÃs, de carÃter nacional, ligada à administraÃÃo federal.

[pt] Gustavo Barroso (1888-1959) desenvolveu um pensamento sistemático na área de museus, fruto de uma prática que pode ser percebida, sobretudo, através da criação do Museu Histórico Nacional (1922), do Curso de Museus (1932) e da Inspetoria de Monumentos Nacionais (1934). Admitindo a especificidade do pensamento museológico barrosiano, este trabalho busca analisar estas iniciativas de Gustavo Barroso considerando-as como um todo coerente e expressivo para identificar as coordenadas de seu projeto intelectual e para compreender como as noções de tradição, de museu e de patrimônio contribuíram para materializar um projeto de construção da memória nacional. / [en] Gustavo Barroso (1888-1959) was responsable for the systematization of a knowledge concerning museums. That knowledge came from a pratice that can be perceveid, above all, through the creation of Museu Histórico Nacional (1922), Curso de Museus (1932) and Inspetoria de Monumentos Nacionais (1934). This work takes in account specific aspects of the Barroso´s thoughts concerning museums how like all coherent and expressive for identify the setting of your intellectual project and to understand how the notions of tradition, museum and patrimony contributed to materialize a project of construction of the national memory.

Cette thèse questionne l’apport de la conservation du patrimoine urbain à l’urbanisme. Il y est avancé que l’association entre la conservation du patrimoine urbain et l'urbanisme, dans leur cadre conceptuel actuel, plutôt que d’être le catalyseur du renouvellement de l’urbanisme, a perpétué une appréhension fragmentée et une atomisation de l'établissement, consacrant ainsi le paradigme fonctionnaliste, qui conditionne encore largement les pratiques urbanistiques contemporaines, au Québec notamment. En effet, bien que depuis les années 1960 la conservation du patrimoine soit présentée comme le fil rouge dans le redéploiement de la compétence d’édifier, plusieurs études soulignent les résultats mitigés de nombreuses expériences de conservation ainsi qu’une contribution limitée relativement à la formulation des projets urbains. Plus particulièrement, malgré la reconnaissance de l’intérêt de la patrimonialisation et de la fécondité potentielle de l’idée de patrimoine en général, l’urbanisme n’est pas parvenu à en définir les termes de la contribution, tant au plan conceptuel que processuel, en regard de sa propre projectualité. De ce fait, il ne réussit pas à affranchir la réflexion patrimoniale du registre de la conservation afin de se l’approprier véritablement. Cette thèse explique les causes de cette incapacité à partir d’une analyse des conditions de l’appropriation de la notion de patrimoine urbain mises de l’avant par l’approche giovannonienne. Celle-ci, fondamentalement urbanistique, propose une conception du patrimoine urbain qui s’émancipe du monument historique et du registre de la conservation. Indissociable d’une projectualité urbanistique, l’intérêt pour le patrimoine urbain de Giovannoni relève d’une reconnaissance du déjà là qui fonde des modalités de prises en charge de l’existant. Celles-ci posent les bases d’un renouvellement de la manière de penser l’urbanisme. La notion giovannonienne de patrimoine urbain, qui réfère à l’ensemble urbain patrimonial, devient l’élément de base d’une analyse morphologique urbanistique qui permet de conceptualiser l’agglomération contemporaine comme ensemble marqué par les ruptures et les discontinuités. Prenant appui sur une démarche dialogique, l’approche giovannonienne relève d’une mise en tension des singularités et d’une appréhension conjointe des différentes registres, ceux des formes et des forces, de l’existant et du souhaité, du penser et du faire. Giovannoni dépasse ainsi l’opposition entre continuité et rupture portée par les pratiques afin de penser l’articulation du nouveau à l’ancien. La confrontation de l’approche giovannonienne aux différentes perspectives qui ont marqué l’urbanisme moderne, montre que ces modalités de prise en charge de l’existant sont conditionnelles à l’accomplissement des promesses de la considération du patrimoine urbain. Autrement, l’association de la conservation du patrimoine urbain et de l’urbanisme culmine dans une double assimilation : l’assimilation du patrimoine urbain au monument historique d’architecture conduit à confondre projet d’urbanisme et projet de conservation. / This thesis questions the contribution of heritage conservation to urbanism. It has been proposed that the association between heritage conservation and urbanism in their present conceptual framework, rather than being the catalyst for rethinking urban projects has perpetuated a sectoral approach and atomization of human settlement, thus entrenching the functionalist paradigm that still largely conditions contemporary planning practices, notably in Québec. Indeed, although heritage conservation has been a recurrent theme since the 1960s in the redeployment of town planning skills, several studies have underscored the mitigated results of numerous conservation attempts and also of the limited contribution made to the planning of urban projects. More specifically, in spite of the interest in heritage conservation and the potentially fertile nature of the idea of heritage generally, urbanism has not yet defined the terms of the contribution, not only from a conceptual point of view but also from a urbanistic point of view with respect to its project-based thinking (progettualità). Consequently, urbanism does not succeed in overcoming the heritage idea of the preservation register in order to fully encompass it. This thesis explains the causes of this inability from an analysis of the conditions for adopting the notion of urban heritage as advanced by Giovannoni. This fundamentally urbanistic approach puts forward a concept of urban heritage that has freed itself from the historical monument of the preservation register. Inseparable from an urbanistic project-based system, the interest for Giovannoni’s urban heritage arises from a recognition that what already exists creates a means for grasping the true personality of place and therefore offers insight for better urban design and planning. Giovannoni’s idea of urban heritage becomes the basic element of an urbanistic morphological analysis that allows for the conceptualization of the modern city as an entity marked by ruptures and discontinuities. Giovannoni exploits the differences in the personality of urban entities, such as places, neighbourhoods, etc., and visits back and forth between different scales and registers, those of forms and forces, of the existing and the hoped for, of ideas and action. Giovannoni thus goes beyond the divergence between continuity and rupture that marks, in a general way, the practices for envisioning the articulation of the new to the old. When we compare Giovannoni’s approach to the different views that have impacted modern urbanism, we find that his practices for using what already exists is the condition for the realization of urban heritage promises. Otherwise, the association of heritage conservation and urbanism culminates in the assimilation of urban heritage to the historical monument of architecture, and therefore leads to equating the urban project to the conservation project.

O foco dessa dissertação é a Exposição Histórica do Brasil organizada no interior da Exposição do Mundo Português, em Lisboa, no ano de 1940, quando Oliveira Salazar decidiu comemorar os centenários da fundação de Portugal (1139) e o da Restauração (1640). A Exposição brasileira foi orientada e executada sob a direção de Gustavo Barroso, enviado a Portugal como um dos delegados do Brasil à Exposição do Mundo Português e como Diretor do Museu Histórico Nacional. Ao propor a Exposição Histórica do Brasil como tema, pretendeu-se compreendê-la como expressão de uma forma específica de reconstituir o passado do Brasil, tentando inseri-la no contexto cultural e político do período, contribuindo para o entendimento do modo pelo qual se configurou, na época, uma escrita da História do Brasil, simultaneamente, incrustada no Museu Histórico Nacional e no espaço dos eventos ocorridos em Portugal. / The focus of this essay is the Historical Exposition of Brazil organized inside the Exhibition of the Portuguese World, in Lisbon, in 1940, when Oliveira Salazar decided to celebrate the centenary of Portugal foundation (1139) and of the Restoration (1640). The Brazilian Exposition was guided and carried out by the lead of Gustavo Barroso, who was sent to Portugal as one of the Brazilian representatives in the Exhibition of the Portuguese World and as the Curator of the National Historical Museum. In proposing the Historical Exposition of Brazil as a theme, the intention was to understand it as an expression of a specific way of reconstituting the past of Brazil, trying to insert it in the political and cultural context of the time, contributing to the understanding of how it configured, at the time, a writing of the History of Brazil, simultaneously, incrusted in the National Historical Museum and in the area where the events took place in Portugal.

O foco dessa dissertação é a Exposição Histórica do Brasil organizada no interior da Exposição do Mundo Português, em Lisboa, no ano de 1940, quando Oliveira Salazar decidiu comemorar os centenários da fundação de Portugal (1139) e o da Restauração (1640). A Exposição brasileira foi orientada e executada sob a direção de Gustavo Barroso, enviado a Portugal como um dos delegados do Brasil à Exposição do Mundo Português e como Diretor do Museu Histórico Nacional. Ao propor a Exposição Histórica do Brasil como tema, pretendeu-se compreendê-la como expressão de uma forma específica de reconstituir o passado do Brasil, tentando inseri-la no contexto cultural e político do período, contribuindo para o entendimento do modo pelo qual se configurou, na época, uma escrita da História do Brasil, simultaneamente, incrustada no Museu Histórico Nacional e no espaço dos eventos ocorridos em Portugal. / The focus of this essay is the Historical Exposition of Brazil organized inside the Exhibition of the Portuguese World, in Lisbon, in 1940, when Oliveira Salazar decided to celebrate the centenary of Portugal foundation (1139) and of the Restoration (1640). The Brazilian Exposition was guided and carried out by the lead of Gustavo Barroso, who was sent to Portugal as one of the Brazilian representatives in the Exhibition of the Portuguese World and as the Curator of the National Historical Museum. In proposing the Historical Exposition of Brazil as a theme, the intention was to understand it as an expression of a specific way of reconstituting the past of Brazil, trying to insert it in the political and cultural context of the time, contributing to the understanding of how it configured, at the time, a writing of the History of Brazil, simultaneously, incrusted in the National Historical Museum and in the area where the events took place in Portugal.

Cette thèse questionne l’apport de la conservation du patrimoine urbain à l’urbanisme. Il y est avancé que l’association entre la conservation du patrimoine urbain et l'urbanisme, dans leur cadre conceptuel actuel, plutôt que d’être le catalyseur du renouvellement de l’urbanisme, a perpétué une appréhension fragmentée et une atomisation de l'établissement, consacrant ainsi le paradigme fonctionnaliste, qui conditionne encore largement les pratiques urbanistiques contemporaines, au Québec notamment. En effet, bien que depuis les années 1960 la conservation du patrimoine soit présentée comme le fil rouge dans le redéploiement de la compétence d’édifier, plusieurs études soulignent les résultats mitigés de nombreuses expériences de conservation ainsi qu’une contribution limitée relativement à la formulation des projets urbains. Plus particulièrement, malgré la reconnaissance de l’intérêt de la patrimonialisation et de la fécondité potentielle de l’idée de patrimoine en général, l’urbanisme n’est pas parvenu à en définir les termes de la contribution, tant au plan conceptuel que processuel, en regard de sa propre projectualité. De ce fait, il ne réussit pas à affranchir la réflexion patrimoniale du registre de la conservation afin de se l’approprier véritablement. Cette thèse explique les causes de cette incapacité à partir d’une analyse des conditions de l’appropriation de la notion de patrimoine urbain mises de l’avant par l’approche giovannonienne. Celle-ci, fondamentalement urbanistique, propose une conception du patrimoine urbain qui s’émancipe du monument historique et du registre de la conservation. Indissociable d’une projectualité urbanistique, l’intérêt pour le patrimoine urbain de Giovannoni relève d’une reconnaissance du déjà là qui fonde des modalités de prises en charge de l’existant. Celles-ci posent les bases d’un renouvellement de la manière de penser l’urbanisme. La notion giovannonienne de patrimoine urbain, qui réfère à l’ensemble urbain patrimonial, devient l’élément de base d’une analyse morphologique urbanistique qui permet de conceptualiser l’agglomération contemporaine comme ensemble marqué par les ruptures et les discontinuités. Prenant appui sur une démarche dialogique, l’approche giovannonienne relève d’une mise en tension des singularités et d’une appréhension conjointe des différentes registres, ceux des formes et des forces, de l’existant et du souhaité, du penser et du faire. Giovannoni dépasse ainsi l’opposition entre continuité et rupture portée par les pratiques afin de penser l’articulation du nouveau à l’ancien. La confrontation de l’approche giovannonienne aux différentes perspectives qui ont marqué l’urbanisme moderne, montre que ces modalités de prise en charge de l’existant sont conditionnelles à l’accomplissement des promesses de la considération du patrimoine urbain. Autrement, l’association de la conservation du patrimoine urbain et de l’urbanisme culmine dans une double assimilation : l’assimilation du patrimoine urbain au monument historique d’architecture conduit à confondre projet d’urbanisme et projet de conservation. / This thesis questions the contribution of heritage conservation to urbanism. It has been proposed that the association between heritage conservation and urbanism in their present conceptual framework, rather than being the catalyst for rethinking urban projects has perpetuated a sectoral approach and atomization of human settlement, thus entrenching the functionalist paradigm that still largely conditions contemporary planning practices, notably in Québec. Indeed, although heritage conservation has been a recurrent theme since the 1960s in the redeployment of town planning skills, several studies have underscored the mitigated results of numerous conservation attempts and also of the limited contribution made to the planning of urban projects. More specifically, in spite of the interest in heritage conservation and the potentially fertile nature of the idea of heritage generally, urbanism has not yet defined the terms of the contribution, not only from a conceptual point of view but also from a urbanistic point of view with respect to its project-based thinking (progettualità). Consequently, urbanism does not succeed in overcoming the heritage idea of the preservation register in order to fully encompass it. This thesis explains the causes of this inability from an analysis of the conditions for adopting the notion of urban heritage as advanced by Giovannoni. This fundamentally urbanistic approach puts forward a concept of urban heritage that has freed itself from the historical monument of the preservation register. Inseparable from an urbanistic project-based system, the interest for Giovannoni’s urban heritage arises from a recognition that what already exists creates a means for grasping the true personality of place and therefore offers insight for better urban design and planning. Giovannoni’s idea of urban heritage becomes the basic element of an urbanistic morphological analysis that allows for the conceptualization of the modern city as an entity marked by ruptures and discontinuities. Giovannoni exploits the differences in the personality of urban entities, such as places, neighbourhoods, etc., and visits back and forth between different scales and registers, those of forms and forces, of the existing and the hoped for, of ideas and action. Giovannoni thus goes beyond the divergence between continuity and rupture that marks, in a general way, the practices for envisioning the articulation of the new to the old. When we compare Giovannoni’s approach to the different views that have impacted modern urbanism, we find that his practices for using what already exists is the condition for the realization of urban heritage promises. Otherwise, the association of heritage conservation and urbanism culminates in the assimilation of urban heritage to the historical monument of architecture, and therefore leads to equating the urban project to the conservation project.

CAPES / O presente estudo focaliza as representações de ciência e tecnologia no pensamento do intelectual Gustavo Barroso entre o período de 1909 e 1935. Sendo um dos principais líderes da Ação Integralista Brasileira, averiguaremos especialmente a sua visão eugênica, anterior a sua participação no integralismo e a influência dessa ciência na construção de seu pensamento autoritário e antissemita. Procuramos perceber o diálogo de Gustavo Barroso, em um contexto de profundas transformações sociais e políticas, com a busca de um nacionalismo “verdadeiramente brasileiro”. A metodologia utilizada foi a pesquisa de cunho bibliográfica e documental, destacando-se a análise dos livros de Gustavo Barroso, que foram utilizados como fontes primárias: Intelligencia das Coisas(1923), Aquém da Atlântida (1931), Brasil Colônia de Banqueiros (1934), O Integralismo de Norte a Sul (1934), O Quarto Império (1935) e A Palavra e o Pensamento Integralista (1935), além de alguns de seus artigos pesquisados no acervo do Museu Histórico Nacional. Os resultados da pesquisa demonstram que neste período Gustavo Barroso passou a desenvolver em seus escritos uma visão política autoritária, eugênica e posteriormente, no integralismo, ligada fortemente ao antissemitismo. / This study focuses on the representations of science and technology in the thinking of the Brazilian intellectual Gustavo Barroso in the period between 1909 and 1935. As one of the main leaders of the Brazilian Integralism, we will discuss,especially, his eugenic vision, prior to his participation in integralism and the influence of this science in building his authoritarian and anti-Semitic thinking. We seek to realize Gustavo Barroso dialogue, in a context of profound social and political changes, with the search for a nationalism "truly Brazilian." The methodology used was of a documentary and literature research , highlighting the analysis of Gustavo Barroso books, which were used as primary sources: Intelligencia das Coisas(1923), Aquém da Atlântida (1931), Brasil Colônia de Banqueiros (1934), O Integralismo de Norte a Sul (1934), O Quarto Império (1935) e A Palavra e o Pensamento Integralista (1935), and, also, some of his articles surveyed in the National History Museum collection. The survey results show that in this period Gustavo Barroso went on to develop in his writings an eugenic and authoritarian political vision, later, in his integralist phase, linked strongly to an anti-Semitic view.

Ellen G. White and Gustavo Gutierrez make significant contributions on the issue of christians and involvement in politics. A knowledge of their backgrounds and theological orientations is helpful. White was born in 1827. She is accepted as a prophet in the Seventh-day Adventist church. Central to her theology is the sanctuary doctrine which also influences her views on politics. White holds that christians may participate in the "broad" but not the "narrow" aspect of politics. A Roman Catholic priest, Gutierrez was born in 1928. Many regard him as the pioneer of liberation theology. The starting point for his theology is the situation of poverty in Latin America. This influences his views on politics. He also argues for christians' participation in the "broad" but not the "narrow" aspect of politics. White and Gutierrez have more points of agreement than disagreement. Comparing their views on politics provides useful insights on christians' participation in politics. "I declare that: ELLEN G. WHITE AND GUSTAVO GUTIERREZ ON CHRISTIANS AND INVOLVEMENT IN POLITICS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged complete references' / Philosophy, Practical & Systematic Theology / M.Th. (Systematic Theology)

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo definir las representaciones de la villa y los vecinos de la villa dentro de los poemarios hasta hoy publicados por los poetas Gustavo Lara y César González. Para comprender la construcción de las representaciones y su valor distintivo, previamente buscaremos contextualizar las obras refiriéndonos a la historia de la literatura villera, especialmente a través de tres de sus principales representantes: Rodolfo Fogwill, César Aira y Horacio Verbitsky. Con una noción del panorama actual de la literatura villera, proseguiremos a profundizar en la cuestión de la raza y el género dentro de las representaciones bajo una perspectiva interseccional. Para respaldar teóricamente este proceso analítico y comparativo, utilizamos los estudios poscoloniales y culturales, entre cuyos autores contamos a Alejandro Solomianski, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak y Walter Mignolo. A partir de esta propuesta y metodología, este estudio no solamente podría esclarecer la manera en que se construyen las representaciones literarias de la villa y sus vecinos, sino también difundir la voz de estos poetas villeros. / This work aims to define the representations of the villa and the residents of the villa in the works published by Gustavo Lara and César González. To understand the construction of these representations and their distinctive value, we seek to contextualize the works by referring to the history of the literature about the villas, focusing especially in three of its main representatives: Rodolfo Fogwill, César Aira and Horacio Verbitsky. With a clear understanding of the current landscape of the literature of the villas, we will continue with an intersectional approach, delving into the issue of race and gender in the representations. To support this analytical and comparative process, we base it within postcolonial and cultural studies, among which authors we find Alejandro Solomianski, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Walter Mignolo. From this proposal and methodology, we hope this study not only can clarify how the representations of the villa and its neighbors are built, but also diffuse the voice of these poets. / Literaturas del empoderamiento