Hochfliegende Raumfahrt-, Atom- und Automatisierungsvisionen revitalisierten seit den 1950er Jahren die Popularisierung von Zukunftstechnik. Selbst die Psychiatrische Landesanstalt Hubertusburg blieb von diesen Zeitströmungen nicht unberührt: Karl Hans Janke (1909–1988) entwarf in den fast vier Jahrzehnten, die er in Wermsdorf wegen "chronisch paranoider Schizophrenie" verbrachte, tausende Fahr- und Flugzeuge, Raumschiffe und Triebwerke, Energiekonzepte und elektrische Geräte. Der begabte Zeichner und Konstrukteur bastelte zahlreiche Modelle und arbeitete an einer alternativen Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen, die er in seine Kosmologie einbettete. Dazu hielt er Vorträge und korrespondierte mit Betrieben und staatlichen Stellen.

Hochsch., Diss u.d.T.: Lemke, Matthias: Progressiver Sozialismus--Vechta, 2007.

Zugl.: München, Univ., Diss., 2008

Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2007

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Heidelberg, 1913. / "Die vorliegende Dissertation bildet die Kapitel VII. und VIII. einer grösseren Arbeit, die unter dem Titel "Studien zu den Entwicklungsjahren der Brüder Gerlach" in den Heidelberger Abhandlungen der mittleren und neueren Geschichte (Verlag von Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung) erscheinen wird"--T.p. verso. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (doctoral)--Technische Universität, Berlin, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 385-396).

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Bonn, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [257]-283).

Ce n’est guère le mouvement jeune-hégélien qui vient immédiatement à l’espritlorsque sont évoqués les noms de Bakounine, d'Engels, de Marx ou même deStirner. Le premier et le dernier sont généralement associés à l’anarchisme,les deux autres, plus indubitablement encore, au marxisme. L'histoire de cespersonnages et le devenir de leurs œuvres n'ont pu que faire de l'ombre à leurappartenance commune et concomitante, trente ans avant que ne se cristallisentlesdits courants politiques, à ce qui a parfois été apparenté à une écolephilosophiqueLa présente thèse propose une lecture immanente, laquelle ne s'efforce pasmoins de restituer un contexte, des principaux écrits rédigés par ces auteursentre 1842 et 1843. La pensée de chacun d'entre eux est présentée dans sesinterrogations et ses enjeux propres, en s'intéressant aux emprunts et auxinnovations conceptuelles réalisées pour y répondre et tout en maintenantd’incessants aller-retours avec le champ problématique relatif au mouvementdans lequel elle prend corps et s’introduit.Il ne s'agit pas, par là, de procéder à une simple mise au point en matièred'histoire des idées. L'un des intérêts majeurs des textes abordés réside dansce qu'ils nous disent, dans une perspective post-hégélienne, de la philosophie.Les descriptions du présent que l'on trouve dans ces textes concordent, eneffet, quant à l'impossibilité d'établir l'unité du rationnel et de l'effectif.Tout reste encore à faire pour qui ne renonce pas à la réalisation de laliberté dans l'histoire. À suivre Hegel, pourtant, la philosophie doit secontenter de décrire ledit procès ou ses résultats. Doit-on se résoudre à ceque la philosophie ne puisse concourir à un destin dont elle a donné la clé ?N'est-il pas possible de la renouveler ? Et comment ? S'agit-il plutôt d'ensortir et d'imaginer d'autres formes d'intervention théoriques et pratiques ?Et qu'en est-il alors de ce qui reste de philosophique ? / The names of Bakunin, Engels, Marx, or Stirner are hardly ever associated withthe Young Hegelian movement. Bakunin and Stirner are generally associated withanarchism and Marx and Engels with marxism. Their lives and the fate of theirworks could do no more than obliterate the mutual and concomitant contributionsof these authors to what has sometimes been described as a philosophicalschool. This participation, in any case, occured thirty years before thecristallisation of the aforesaid political movements.This research proposes an immanent, and at the same time contextual, reading ofthe main texts written by these authors between 1842 and 1843. The theories ofeach of them are presented in accordance with their own questions and issues,focusing on the conceptual borrowings and innovations realised as aconsequence. They are expounded through a perpetual to and fro between theproblematic field related to the movement from which they were born and inwhich they participated.Nevertheless this study cannot be reduced to a mere contribution to the historyof ideas. One of the key interests of the analysed texts lies in what they tellus, from a post-hegelian perspective, about philosophy. When they describetheir epoch, they all conclude that there is no identity of the rational andthe real. There is still much to do for those who do not abandon the idea of therealisation of freedom in history. However, according to Hegel, philosophy canonly describe the process or the results of this realisation. Cannot philosophycontribute to the destiny it revealed? And if not, is it possible to renewphilosophy? How? Would an exit from philosophy be preferable? Other forms oftheoretical and practical intervention could be invented. But then, what aboutthe "philosophical" that remains?

Denna studie behandlar ämnet ledarskap och inriktar sig på den militära ledarskapsteorin Utvecklande ledarskap.  Uppsatsen syftar till att undersöka om Karl XII:s framgångar som ledare kan förklaras genom en modern ledarskapsteori såsom Utvecklande ledarskap. Detta görs genom att undersöka om de eftersträvansvärda ledarkaraktäristika som nämns i Utvecklande ledarskap även går att finna i återberättelser om Karl XII:s ledarskap under den Senkarolinska tiden. Teorin Utvecklande ledarskap har analyserats gentemot dess föregångare Transformational leadership för att få en djupare förståelse för vad den utvecklande ledarskapsteorin innebär samt öka utbudet på beskrivningar av eftersträvansvärda ledaregenskaper. Här identifieras tre kännetecken som sammanfattar teorins önskvärda ledaregenskaper: Föredöme, Personlig omtanke samt Inspiration och motivation. Dessa kännetecken prövas sedan mot återberättelser av Karl XII:s ledarskap för att påvisa att många av de önskvärda ledaregenskaper som nämns i de moderna ledarskapsteorierna även gick att finna i Karl XII:s ledarskap. Resultatet av studien blev att många av de karaktärsdrag som nämns i Utvecklande ledarskap också gick att finna hos Karl XII med skillnaden att innebörden av begreppen ändrats på grund av kulturella och religiösa förändringar med tiden. En sista skillnad är att dessa karaktärsdrag inte var nedtecknade i en teoretisk modell under den Senkarolinska tiden, då Karl XII regerade, vilket försvårade transferering och utbildning i ämnet. / This study is about leadership and directed towards the modern leadership theory Developmental leadership. The paper tries to explain some of Karl XII’s success as a leader by examining if he followed some of the principles of Developmental leadership. This is done by researching if the desirable leadership traits mentioned in Developmental leadership can also be found in narrations of Karl XII’s leadership during the late Carolinian times. The theory of Developmental leadership has been analyzed in relation to its progenitor Transformational leadership in order to get a deeper understanding for what Developmental leadership means and increase the range of descriptions of desirable leadership traits. Three characteristics are identified that summarize the desirable traits of the theories: Role model behavior, Personal care and Inspiration and motivation. These characteristics are then tested against narrations of Karl XII’s leadership to prove that many of the desirable leadership traits mentioned in modern leadership theories also were to be found in Karl XII’s leadership. The results of the study was that many of the traits mentioned in Developmental leadership also were found in Karl XII’s leadership, though different in regards to the meaning of some of the traits that has been altered due to cultural and religious changes by time. One last difference is that these traits and characteristics not were written down as a theoretical model during the late Carolinian times, when Karl XII ruled, which hampered the transference of knowledge and education on the field of study.

MACIEL, Amélia Coelho Rodrigues. A sociedade civil- burguesa em Karl Max. 2016. 131f. – Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Fortaleza (CE), 2016. / Submitted by Gustavo Daher (gdaherufc@hotmail.com) on 2016-11-03T17:32:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_acrmaciel.pdf: 659771 bytes, checksum: 6cc558b591593208a85bd512299c1c70 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-11-07T11:25:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_acrmaciel.pdf: 659771 bytes, checksum: 6cc558b591593208a85bd512299c1c70 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-07T11:25:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_acrmaciel.pdf: 659771 bytes, checksum: 6cc558b591593208a85bd512299c1c70 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 / A pesquisa desenvolvida nesta dissertação tem por objetivo fundamental analisar a sociedade civil-burguesa no pensamento de Karl Marx. Desta forma, perpassaremos por diversas obras de Marx pertinentes a esta temática, desde o juvenil ensaio de 1843, conhecida por Crítica da Filosofia do Direito de Hegel, até sua madura obra O Capital, de 1867. Delineia-se, então, que a metodologia privilegiada é a pesquisa bibliográfica, eminentemente teórica. Reconhecendo que Marx passou por um profundo processo de influência e revisão filosófica, especialmente das filosofias de Hegel e Feuerbach, a primeira problemática a enfrentar versará sobre os pressupostos teóricos do desenvolvimento marxiano do conceito de sociedade civil-burguesa. Sendo assim, preliminarmente, perpassaremos pela filosofia de Hegel, por meio da obra Princípios da Filosofia do Direito, de 1820. Em seguida, abordaremos a filosofia materialista de Feuerbach, detidamente nas obras Princípios da Filosofia do Futuro (1843) e Para a Crítica da Filosofia de Hegel (1839). Em seguida, passaremos pelas obras filosóficas de Marx conhecidas como de juventude. Essas obras serão a Crítica da Filosofia do Direito de Hegel, Introdução à Crítica da Filosofia do Direito de Hegel (1844) e Sobre a Questão Judaica (1843). Será importante abordar a problemática sobre as influências das filosofias de Hegel e Feuerbach, pois no próximo momento, ou seja, no segundo capítulo, será abordada a crítica de Marx à especulação neohegeliana, vinculando-a ao posicionamento marxiano acerca da sociedade civil-burguesa, utilizando a obra de Marx A Sagrada Família ou A Crítica da Crítica Crítica: Contra Bruno Bauer e Consortes, de 1845. Dando prosseguimento, a pesquisa dissertativa enfrentará a problemática histórica e econômica de Marx relacionada à sociedade civil-burguesa por meio dos Manuscritos Econômico-Filosóficos, escritos em 1844. Nesta mesma perspectiva, a próxima obra a ser explorada será A Ideologia Alemã. Nesta obra, escrita entre 1845 e 1846, em conjunto com Engels, encontraremos a conceituação acabada da sociedade civil-burguesa em Marx, considerada na concretude da esfera de produção. Por fim, encerraremos este estudo problematizando a sociedade civil-burguesa em seu funcionamento. Conforme esclarece Marx no prefácio da Contribuição à Crítica da Economia Política (1859), a anatomia da sociedade civil-burguesa é encontrada na economia política. Então, encerrando a pesquisa, estudaremos O Capital, obra onde é possível levantar a hipótese de que a análise crítica de Marx sobre a economia política reafirma sua concepção filosófica de que a sociedade civil-burguesa como a matriz ontológica do todo social.