Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:26:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jonece M Beltrame.pdf: 666966 bytes, checksum: f101b23cc802795eb6e3fb455756ad1d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-06-25 / The study The theory of human emancipation in Marx: Rheinische Zeitung to Deutsch-Franzöische Jahrbücher encompasses the period of Marxist thought from his doctoral thesis in 1841, his political contribution to Rheinische Zeitung and articles in Deutsch-Franzöische Jahrbücher in 1844. The aim is to understand the evolution of Marxist thought, identifying relationships between Marx s thought and Hegelian and neo-Hegelian thought. The Marxist understanding of human emancipation in its relation to the concepts of state, politics, philosophy and the world, and philosophy and the proletariat are of particular interest. During this period, Marx breaks away from a positive vision of politics the achievement of reason and humanity through politicization comparing this vision with the concept of human emancipation. He thus develops a negative vision of politicization, suggesting that politics loses the centrality it held throughout history in terms of its potential for achieving rationality and humanity. This presents the concept of human emancipation in that it overcomes and, to a certain extent, opposes the idea of political emancipation as a possibility of achieving humanity, the concept that is the aim of this research. In addition to this, the examination of these questions include a discussion into relationships between philosophy and the proletariat that Marx begins to develop during this period of criticism and the rupture with Hegelian and neo-Hegelian thought. / A pesquisa A teoria da emancipação humana no pensamento de Marx: da Gazeta Renana aos Anais Franco-Alemães, abrange o período de pensamento que vai da tese de doutoramento em 1841, cobrindo sua inserção política na Gazeta Renana, aos artigos publicados nos Anais Franco-Alemães, em 1844. Nosso objetivo é o de compreender a evolução do pensamento marxiano, identificando as relações entre o pensamento de Marx e o pensamento hegeliano e neo-hegeliano. Temos um interesse localizado em relação à concepção marxiana de emancipação humana na sua relação com as concepções de Estado, política, filosofia e mundo, e filosofia e proletariado. Nesse período, Marx rompe com a visão positiva acerca da política realização da racionalidade e da humanidade através da politicidade e contrapõe a essa visão o conceito de emancipação humana. Desta forma, elabora uma visão negativa acerca da politicidade, o que implica no fato de a política perder a centralidade que possuía ao longo da história, em relação à possibilidade de realização da racionalidade e humanidade. Apresenta precisamente a concepção de emancipação humana, na medida em que ultrapassa e, de certa forma, se opõe à idéia de emancipação política, como possibilidade de realização da humanidade, concepção está que é o objeto da nossa pesquisa. E, os estudos dessas questões passam pela discussão das relações entre filosofia e proletariado que Marx começa a desenvolver durante este período de crítica e de ruptura com o pensamento hegeliano e neo-hegeliano.

Esta pesquisa busca examinar as categorias centrais do pensamento de Marx tendo em vista uma questão atual: a expansão da atividade intelectual como forma do trabalho subsumido ao capital. Em contraposição às teorias que veem esta transformação como fator que altera a teoria do valor e torna a compreensão marxiana do capital obsoleta, examino nos textos de Marx a relação geral entre trabalho e conhecimento, pautada em sua compreensão do indivíduo e da sociabilidade. Busco então conectar essas categorias fundantes com a história, distinguindo a dialética do desenvolvimento nas sociedades pré-capitalista e no modo de produção do capital. No interior deste último, destaco dois temas centrais, a categoria de trabalho abstrato como forma social específica do trabalho, e a relação contraditória entre o desenvolvimento das forças produtivas com a forma social do capital. É este desenvolvimento que transforma a relação entre trabalho e conhecimento, bem como a divisão entre trabalho material e trabalho intelectual nesta fase avançada do evolver do capital. A partir do exame deste tema, aponto por fim algumas das mudanças atuais que revelam o aprofundamento da contradição que permeia a reprodução capitalista. Na abordagem destes temas, discuto com autores que buscam explicar as vicissitudes atuais, bem como com comentadores da obra marxiana que privilegiam o ponto de vista lógico ao examinar seus textos. / This research seeks to examine the central categories of Marxs thought regarding a current issue: the expansion of intellectual activity as a form of labor subsumed to capital. In contrast to theories that see this transformation as a factor that changes the theory of value and makes the Marxian understanding of capital obsolete, this research examines the overall relationship between labor and knowledge in Marxs texts, based on his understanding of the individual and sociability. It aims then to connect these founding categories with history, distinguishing the dialectic of development in pre-capitalist societies and the capitalist mode of production. Inside the latter, two central themes are highlighted, the abstract labor category as a specific social form of work, and the contradictory relationship between the development of productive forces and capital-relation. It is this development that transforms the relationship between labor and knowledge, as well as the division between material and intellectual production, at this late stage of capital expansion. From the examination of this issue, it is pointed at last some of the current changes that reveal the depth of the contradiction that pervades capitalist reproduction. In addressing these issues, authors who seek to explain the current changes are discussed as well as interpretations of Marxs thought that favor the logical point of view.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-29T11:13:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 tese_7469_DISSERTAÇÃO_POLLYANNA_TRABALHO IMATERIAL E A TEORIA DO VALOR_versão final.pdf: 1655764 bytes, checksum: 2a7e1f233861f15daa6ed2d2b39eb741 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-07-10 / Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo discutir a problemática central existente entre a teoria do valor de Karl Marx e a chamada teoria do trabalho imaterial. Refere-se essa divergência à tese da superação da teoria do valor trabalho de Marx para compreensão da atual dinâmica do modo de produção capitalista, que para alguns, encontra-se hoje sob a égide da produção imaterial. Segundo os autores alinhados a essa corrente, como André Gorz, Antônio Negri e Mauricio Lazzarato, por ser essa produção repleta de caráteres subjetivos e, portanto irreprodutíveis, torna-se impossível estabelecer uma relação entre seu preço e o tempo de trabalho dispendido para sua reprodução. Logo, a teoria marxista do valor torna-se insuficiente para subsidiar as análises desse novo momento econômico. Nosso trabalho apresenta uma crítica a essa perspectiva, chegando à conclusão que a teoria do valor de Marx tem ainda enorme pertinência para análise das novas formas assumidas pelo capitalismo contemporâneo e que, principalmente, fornece as bases teóricas para a compreensão das temáticas referentes ao que se denomina imaterial. Para isso, avançamos em um aspecto central, que reside na constatação de que há uma incompreensão acerca da [verdadeira] natureza do imaterial, que podemos entender como toda ideia e elaboração intelectual humana. A não apreensão desse sentido faz com que aqueles autores vinculados à teoria do trabalho imaterial, incorram em dois equívocos essenciais: em primeiro lugar, essa confusão leva-os a classificar os setores produtores de serviços muitos deles produtivos e materiais para Marx como parte da produção imaterial. Revelamos dessa forma, como a determinação dos preços desses serviços ainda se assenta sobre a magnitude de seus valores. Em segundo, há um desconhecimento da verdadeira forma de produção desse imaterial a produção do conhecimento e de como se determina seu preço. Assim, à luz da teoria de Marx, é possível perceber que o conhecimento em si não é criador de riqueza e que sua remuneração ocorre por meio da apropriação de parcela do valor gerado na produção material, de forma semelhante ao que ocorre à renda da terra, de modo que a compreensão de sua dinâmica só é possível a partir da categoria marxista do valor. / This research aims to discuss the existing problems between the central theory of value of Karl Marx and the so-called "theory of immaterial labor". It refers to the thesis of this divergence overcoming Marx's labor theory of value to understand the current dynamics of the capitalist mode of production, which for some, is today under the aegis of immaterial production. According to the authors aligned to this current, as André Gorz, Antonio Negri and Maurizio Lazzarato, being this production full of subjective characters and thus irreproducible, it is impossible to establish a relationship between its price and the time spent in it‘s production. Hence, the Marxist theory of value becomes insufficient to support the analysis of the ―new‖ economic times. Our work presents a critique of this perspective and concludes that Marx's labor theory of value is still relevant to the analysis of the new forms taken by contemporary capitalism, and that it mainly provides the theoretical basis for understanding the issues related to it is called ―immaterial‖. In order to carry it out, we move forward in an central aspect, which lies at the realization that there is a misunderstanding about the true nature of the immaterial, understood as every idea and human intellectual development. The failure to grasp this meaning makes those authors linked to the theory of immaterial labor, incur in two basic misconceptions: first, this confusion leads them to classify the sectors producing services - many of them productive and materials for Marx - as part of immaterial production. We show that the pricing of these services is still based on the magnitude of their values. Second, there is a lack of understanding the form of production of immaterial - the production of knowledge - and how to determine its price. Thus, in the light of Marx's theory, one can see that knowledge itself is not wealth creator, and that its revenue is obtained through the appropriation of the share of the value generated in the material production, similarly to what happens to the ground rent so that understanding of its dynamics is only possible from the marxist value category

Orientador: Fausto Castilho / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T03:08:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Azara_H.O._D.pdf: 1631494 bytes, checksum: e26383ca657090125921c431f8e9d7e5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 / Resumo: Esta tese procura reconstituir as categorias essenciais do "conceito marxiano de capital como tal", entendido como o núcleo da crítica de Marx à Economia Política e à sociedade capitalista, a que esta ciência corresponde. Nessa reconstituição nosso fio condutor é o uso heurístico feito por Marx de operadores da Lógica hegeliana. Procuramos explicitar o modo como Marx se utiliza da dialética da finitude, que tem como operadores lógicos as noções de limite e barreira, para caracterizar a subjetividade do capital, uma subjetividade marcada pela infinitude da vontade de valor e mais-valor. Essa vontade infinita de valorização se constitui no traço característico do capital como tal, ou seja, o não reconhecimento de limites ou a transformação reiterada de seus próprios limites em barreiras e sua consequente superação. Procuramos mostrar em que consiste a afirmação do capital como relação, isto é, como o capital tem o poder de fixar e subordinar a si o seu outro, o trabalho assalariado. Buscamos explicitar ainda como o capital, seguindo seu impulso sem limites por mais-valor, irá revolucionar completa e incessantemente as bases técnicas e científicas da produção e com isto gerar o processo de negação do trabalho vivo pelo morto que caracteriza a contradição-capital / Abstract: The thesis intends a reconstruction of the essential categories of the "marxian concept of capital as such", which is understood as a pivotal Marx's critique both the political economy and capitalist society in which this science is related. We aim to perceive the heuristic use done by Marx with the operators of the hegelian logic. We seek to demonstrate how Marx takes into account the Hegel's dialectic theory of finitude - which has as logic operators the notions of limit and barriers - to characterize the subjectivity of the capital, which is defined by the infinitude of the will of the value and surplus value. This will infinity of valorization is a fundamental feature of the capital as such. It does not recognize the limits of its own limits in barriers and your consequent overcoming. Furthermore we demonstrated what means the statement of the capital as a relation, this is, how it has the power to fix and subordinate itself and the others - the wage labor. Moreover we addressed how the capital following its momentum without limits from surplus value will increase both the structure of the technique and science production, engendering therefore the process of the denial of living labor by the dead labor which features the contradiction-capital / Doutorado / Filosofia / Doutor em Filosofia

Orientadores: Paulo Sérgio Fracalanza, Adriana Nunes Ferreira / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-27T05:13:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silva_DanielPereirada_M.pdf: 1450979 bytes, checksum: 6a4c458d5f5805902448763c9a2698e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 / Resumo: Neste trabalho de economia política, tratamos de apresentar uma forma de conceber o sujeito econômico através da abordagem psicanalítica de Jacques Lacan. Por esses meios, buscamos abranger os caracteres que contemplam a subjetividade do homem e as complexas relações de composição entre sujeito e a sociedade. Nesse intuito, para muito além de uma aproximação interdisciplinar, nos munimos das severas implicações analíticas que se estabelecem a partir da declaração de Lacan quanto à existência uma homologia estrutural entre o conceito marxiano de mais-valia e o seu conceito de mais-de-gozar. Mostramos, então, como se estabelece essa homologia e de que forma ela proporciona uma abordagem dos sujeitos econômicos no capitalismo. Por fim, tomados dos elementos analíticos que articulamos, empreendemos uma apreciação dos sujeitos econômicos contemporâneos em suas ações de consumo, tendo em vista o estabelecimento de uma sociedade de produção em massa / Abstract: In this political economy study, we aim to present a way of conceiving the economic subject through the psychoanalytic approach of Jacques Lacan. By such means, we seek to comprehend the characters which contemplate the subjectivity of the human and the complex relation of composition between the subject and the society. For that purpose, far beyond of an interdisciplinary approximation, we equip ourselves of the severe analytical implications which are set up from the Lacan¿s declaration on the existence of a structural homology between the Marxian concept of surplus value and his concept of plus-the-jouissance. We demonstrated, then, how to establish this homology and how it provides an analysis of the economic subjects in the capitalism. Finally, we undertook an assessment of the contemporary economic subjects in their consumer actions, in view of the mass production society settlement / Mestrado / Teoria Economica / Mestre em Ciências Econômicas

Cette thèse propose un matériau d’étude constitué par le récit de vie d’un travailleur, syndicaliste, analyste de situations sociales et réalisateur de films vidéo.Une investigation théorique a été nécessaire pour exposer le récit à un matérialisme dialectique et historique. Il a permis de repérer les principales contradictions pour définir des objets de connaisance et appliquer l’approche marxienne dont il ressort huit catégories qui sont autant de nouveaux objets de pensée et renvoient à huit couples de mots. Le premier est issu de l’analyse du récit alors que le second se projette dans l’avenir.Le constat est fait que l’écriture individuelle de l’activité sensible des travailleurs comporte de nombreux obstacles épistémologiques et n’autorise guère en retour de pouvoir agir sur la transformation des milieux de travail. L’hypothèse est avancée que les techniques numériques actuelles permettent de lire cette expérience du travail grâce à une méthode alliant la photographie (concret réel) et le film des dialogues entre pairs et spécialistes (concret pensé).Nous conclurons à une place des travailleurs bien différente des témoignages auxquels ils sont réduits la plupart du temps. La perspective de notre thèse vise à produire des points de vue collectifs qui s’inscrivent dans une vie démocratique au travail où les protagonistes arriveraient à connaître leurs intentions respectives. Nous soutiendrons pour cela la nécessité de cliniques du travail.Nous nous situons dans la filiation d'Ivar Oddone, d’une méthode qui permette de lire collectivement l’expérience du travail par un mouvement du réel vers le concret entre deux registres d’analyse. / This thesis offers a comprehensive study of the life story of a union worker, social commentator and film director.A theorical investigation was necessary in order to expose the narrration to a dialectic and historical materialism. It allowed to identify the main contardictions to define key knowledge and apply the marxian approach. We identified eight categories allowing new thought processes and reflecting eight keywords. The first stems from the analysis of the narration, while the second is future-oriented.The workers’ writing of their own life and experience brings several epistemological obstacles and do not allow any considerable change of the working conditions.We advanced the hypothesis that current digital technologies allow to whitness these work experiences through a method using both photography (practical approach) and film – with the interaction of the peers and experts - (theorical approach.)We will conclude that workers’ roles are significantly different from what testimonies usually lead the public to believe. This thesis’ perspective aims at creating collective view points supporting democratic work conditions, where protagonists are able to identify their own intentions as well as other’s. To this end, we will emphasize the necessity of work cliniques. Our approach is in line with Ivar Oddone’s teachings, supporting a method allowing to collectively read the workplace experience via a movement from realistic to concrete, between two types of analysis.

No description available.

Carl Gottlieb Reissiger was a successful German composer, conductor, and teacher in the first half of the nineteenth century. At the height of his career, he was Hofkapellmeister of theater and opera in Dresden, a position he held until his death. He was a composer of more than 200 works in a multitude of different genres. Today he is mainly known as a composer of opera, a small portion of his total output as a composer. He wrote approximately eighty piano solos, eighty collections of songs or duets, nine masses, and many smaller sacred choral works, as well as 27 piano trios, seven piano quartets, and three piano quintets. In addition to these many works, he wrote five works for the clarinet: Concertino, op. 63, Duo Brillant for clarinet and piano, op. 130, Fantasie, op. 146, Second Fantasie, op. 180, and Adagio und Rondo alla polacca, op. 214. This document provides a biographical sketch of Reissiger, including his personal life, his life as a conductor, and his life as a composer. It also provides a look at the artistic life of his day: his fellow composers and the music they were writing for clarinet, outstanding clarinetists and the different instruments they were playing. The aim of this study is to provide a stylistic analysis of Reissiger's five works for clarinet, including a discussion of form, melody, harmony, and rhythm. This document puts forth the proposal that these works are worth resurrecting and that Reissiger, as a composer of clarinet music, is more than just a secondary composer.

In this essay I try to put Jaspers philosophy of love in dialogue with some of the leading approaches of personal identity. I start briefly with the pre-Socratics Parmenides and Heraclitus. I then introduce some leading identity theories within the analytical tradition and finally the narrative identity theory with Paul Ricoeur at the forefront. In section 2.1, I analyse the basic concept of Umgreifende and its relation to, among others, Kant and Kierkegaard. Knowledge and objectification of personal identity are seen as major problems in identity theories and contrasted with Jaspers’ idea of ​​identity as Existenz. In section 2.2 I analyse Jaspers’ view on action and freedom. Love appears as the cornerstone for Jaspers’ philosophy in general and Existenz in particular. I link Jasper's concept of love to Augustine and at the same time show the differences between the two. In section 2.3, I analyse Jaspers’ view on communication and action which he thinks is the only way for the self to appear and become phenomenal. The world is proving to have a key role as a medium that enables communication. In section 2.4, I clarify Jaspers view on the role of language in intersubjective communication and the possibilities of hermeneutics. The essay concludes with a brief summary.

I föreliggande studie undersöks relationen mellan ”förklaringar” och musikalisk interpretation. Mer specifikt frågan varför jag spelar Prokofievs 6:e pianosonat på ett visst sätt. Alla interpreter gör olika val vid förberedelsen och framförandet av ett musikaliskt verk. Många av de valen handlar om tempo, dynamik, frasering men även andra musikaliska parametrar. Denna studie undersöker till vilken grad sådana val går att basera på analytiska ”förklaringar” rörande musikens struktur. Med hjälp av teoretiska perspektiv från Leonard Meyer och Karl Popper undersöker jag ett antal passager som delvis blivit valda för att belysa hur varierat de brukar tolkas. Framförallt försöker studien att undersöka den ”tysta kunskapen” som ligger bakom specifika interpretationer — och i processen göra den kunskapen artikulerad. På grund av detta kan resultatet vara värdefullt både för teoretiker men också för praktiken inom intepretation. Projektet kulminerade i ett liveframförande av sonaten som spelades in. Det framförandet var influerat av min analys av musiken. / The present study investigates the relationship between “explanations” and musical interpretation. More specifically the question why do I play Prokofievs 6th piano sonata in a particular way? Every interpreter makes choices when preparing and performing a musical work. Many such choices involve tempo, dynamics, or phrasing, as well as other musical parameters. This study explores the degree to which these choices may be based on analytic “explanations" of the structure of the music. Building upon the theoretical work of Leonard Meyer and Karl Popper, I identify certain passages which highlight the diversity of interpretation, examining the differences through structural and interpretive analyses. Above all, the study seeks to understand the “tacit knowledge” embodied in certain approaches to musical interpretation — and, in the process, to make it explicit. Therefore, the results are of potential value not only in performance analysis, but in the training of performers. The project culminated in a performance and live recording of the sonata which were influenced by my analysis of the music.