- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 351 to 360 of 410 (0.034 seconds)| 351 |
Masculinity and Vulnerability in United States Jails and PrisonsOsborne, Taryn Frances January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 352 |
Writing Like a Lawyer: How Law Student Involvement Impacts Self-Reported Gains in Writing Skills in Law SchoolWinek, Kirsten M. 09 September 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 353 |
Delegate Voting at the 1787 Constitutional Convention: The Entanglement of Economic Interests and the Great CompromiseHighkin, Emily January 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 354 |
"Blood for Blood Must Fall": Capital Punishment, Imprisonment, and Criminal Law Reform in Antebellum WisconsinBelczak, Daniel 21 June 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 355 |
The Bodies Belong to No One: Missing and Murdered Indigenous Men in Literature and Law, 1934-2010Anderson, Joshua Tyler, Anderson January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 356 |
Inherently Undesirable: American Identity and the Role of Negative Eugenics in the Education of Visually Impaired and Blind Students in Ohio, 1870-1930Free, Jennifer Lynelle January 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 357 |
A Framing Analysis of News Coverage Related to Litigation Connected to Online Student Speech That Originates Off-CampusIvan, Trevor J. 23 April 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 358 |
INDIGENOUS CONTESTATIONS OF SHIFTING PROPERTY REGIMES: LAND CONFLICTS AND THE NGOBE IN BOCAS DEL TORO, PANAMAThampy, Gayatri S. 09 August 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 359 |
The Forgotten Third Branch: The Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and the MediaPitchman, Adrien 01 January 2015 (has links)
The three branches of government rely on public engagement for the prosperity of the nation. Moreover, informed public opinion is a fundamental tenant of democracy. With that in mind, this paper aims to explore the relationship between the Judicial Branch and the public. Specifically, this paper examines and questions the Supreme Court’s efficacy communicating with the public. American constituents are inundated on a daily basis by the clamor of D.C. politics. The twenty four hour news cycle has given way to politicized headlines and exaggerated pundit commentary on contentious national issues. In a technological age where information is instant and the public has become accustomed to soundbites for education, the Supreme Court is left out of place. Both the Executive Branch and Legislative Branch converse directly with the public when necessary. Politicians frequently address their constituents or discuss complicated issues with voters first hand. However, the Supreme Court has rejected this strategy and instead relies almost exclusively on the press to relay their decisions. The judicial branch is the only third of our government without constant communication to the American people. As a result, the judiciary is relatively ignored by its citizens. By discussing a number of landmark cases since the turn of the century, this paper aims to analyze how those decisions were both announced to the public by the media and how the public received them. The Court has certainly adopted the press as an agent of communication. But is the media truly the proper outlet for the Court’s rulings?
|
| 360 |
Examining the Legality of the Guantánamo Bay Detention Center According to International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights LawWinchester, Sydney T 01 January 2016 (has links)
The purpose of this research paper is to examine how international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) are applied to the Guantánamo Bay detention center. This paper was completed through the research of international treaties, court cases, and secondary sources that thoroughly discussed issues pertaining to Guantánamo and international law.
This paper first examines the differences between the two laws by looking at the particular roles each is meant to play in the subject of international law, as well as how the two have been applied thus far to the situation at Guantánamo. Second, the paper discusses the topic of whether or not IHL and IHRL should be mutually exclusive, or can be interpreted alongside each other. In addition, a discussion of the opposing viewpoints on this topic will be presented including the United States argument of lex specialis, and the opposing arguments of the international community. Chapter three will cover the topic of extraterritorial application and how it affects the international treaties and court cases that deal with issues pertinent to Guantánamo. The fourth chapter discusses the effects that Guantánamo has on the reputation of the United States internationally, and how it affects human rights around the world. Chapter five discusses possible recommendations in order to achieve the long-term goal of ending the Guantanamo Bay controversy, and protecting and promoting human rights everywhere.
|
Page generated in 0.0391 seconds