Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2014-09-15T14:05:20Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao Stefanny Soares de Menezes Dias.pdf: 2240123 bytes, checksum: 816e4a47c4ef004fa3b230924e8cbf60 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-09-15T14:21:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao Stefanny Soares de Menezes Dias.pdf: 2240123 bytes, checksum: 816e4a47c4ef004fa3b230924e8cbf60 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-09-15T14:21:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao Stefanny Soares de Menezes Dias.pdf: 2240123 bytes, checksum: 816e4a47c4ef004fa3b230924e8cbf60 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-09-27 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / The present study aims to conduct a historiographical examination of the book El Perfil del Hombre y la Cultura en México from Samuel Ramos, dated 1934. Accordingly, we seek to amalgamate the importance of intellectual to understand the culture and being mexican, from the reading that another Latin American’s intellectuals have made from this book, looking for similarities and differences in their considerations. Therefore, we performed this exam from themes that Samuel Ramos verticalizes in his book, the main ones being the "feeling of inferiority," the "unthinking imitation" and "creole culture". / O presente estudo tem por objetivo realizar um exame historiográfico da obra El Perfil del Hombre y la Cultura en México de Samuel Ramos, datada de 1934. Nesse sentido, busca-se amalgamar a importância desse intelectual para o entendimento da cultura e do ser mexicano, a partir da leitura que outros intelectuais latino-americanos fizeram dessa obra, procurando afinidades e disparidades em suas considerações. Para tanto, realizamos esse exame a partir dos temas que Samuel Ramos verticaliza em sua obra, sendo os principais o “sentimento de inferioridade”, a “imitação irreflexiva” e a “cultura criolla”.

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Departamento de Estudos Latino-Americanos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Comparados Sobre as Américas, 2018. / Submitted by Raquel Viana (raquelviana@bce.unb.br) on 2018-08-22T21:39:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2018_MaycomPinhoSantiago.pdf: 1832903 bytes, checksum: 59270e69a34a3f37ae12dafaa65c47e2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Raquel Viana (raquelviana@bce.unb.br) on 2018-08-27T22:27:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2018_MaycomPinhoSantiago.pdf: 1832903 bytes, checksum: 59270e69a34a3f37ae12dafaa65c47e2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-27T22:27:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2018_MaycomPinhoSantiago.pdf: 1832903 bytes, checksum: 59270e69a34a3f37ae12dafaa65c47e2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-22 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). / Este é um estudo sobre o movimento muralista mexicano em diálogo com a perspectiva decolonial. São analisados os trabalhos de Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco e David Alfaro Siqueiros, respectivamente, a partir dos murais Historia de Morelos, Conquista y Revolución (1930); La Conquista Española de México (1939) e Cuauhtémoc Contra el Mito (1944). A partir de uma abordagem comparativa entre os três pintores proponho uma discussão sobre a possibilidade de o discurso estético do muralismo mexicano guardar pontos de interseção com os pressupostos da perspectiva decolonial. / This is a study of the Mexican muralist movement in dialogue with decolonial perspective. The works of Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco and David Alfaro Siqueiros, respectively, from the murals Historia de Morelos, Conquista y Revolución (1930); La Conquista Española de México (1939) e Cuauhtémoc Contra el Mito (1944). From a comparative approach between the three painters, this work proposes a discussion about the possibility of discourse esthetic of Mexican muralism to establish points of intersection with the assumptions from a decolonial perspective.

This article explores the reasons behind the decision by the high clergy and the Crown to advocate a «self-support» policy for the parishes. For those powers, it was more convenient to allow parishes to raise their own revenues instead of finding new sources of income, which could erode tithe collections or put further pressure on the royal treasury, as suggested by some isolated voices during the fourth Mexican provincial council of 1771. However, the predominating trend was to induce the faithful to support their parishes. / El objetivo de este artículo es exponer los motivos del alto clero y de la Corona para reafirmar la política de lo que aquí llamo «auto-sustento» de los curatos. Para esos poderes era más conveniente que cada curato se autofinanciara a tener que buscar nuevas fuentes de ingreso, lo cual podía desembocar en un mayor reparto del diezmo o extraer recursos de la Real Hacienda, como plantearon algunas voces aisladas en el IV Concilio provincial mexicano de 1771. La tendencia fue, por el contrario, garantizar que los fieles sustentaran a cada parroquia.

O presente trabalho analisa o papel desempenhado pelo Congresso Mexicano em temas de política externa no período de 1994-2006 (LVI a LIX Legislaturas), correspondente aos mandatos de Ernesto Zedillo e Vicente Fox, à luz dos processos de liberalização econômica e política experimentados pelo país nas últimas décadas. Adotando como referencial os indicadores nível de atividade e nível de divergência, a hipótese formulada é que, durante o período estudado, o Congresso mexicano apresentou um elevado grau de ativismo, mas sua assertividade foi baixa. Nos momentos de maior confronto com o Executivo, o Congresso demonstrou uma reduzida capacidade institucional de impor suas preferências. As limitações dos congressistas para atuar no domínio da política externa estariam relacionadas a fatores estruturais, como os custos de rejeição de um tratado internacional, e conjunturais, a exemplo da dificuldade de construir consensos no interior das Casas Legislativas a respeito de qual seria o papel do Congresso nesta seara. / This work analyses the role of Mexican Congress in foreign policy issues during the period of 1994-2006 (LVI-LIX Legislature), corresponding to the presidencies of Ernesto Zedillo and Vicente Fox, based on the processes of economic and political liberalization faced by the country in the last decades. Taking into account indicating levels of activity on foreign policy issues and disagreement over foreign policy, the hypothesis formulated is that, during the period studied, the Mexican Congress has shown a high level of activism, however its assertiveness was low. In the moments of confrontation with Executive, the Congress has shown little institutional capacity to impose its preferences. The congressmen limitations to act in the realm of foreign policy could be related to structural factors, such as the costs of an international treaty´s rejection, or conjunctural, such as the difficult of constructing consensus in the Upper and Low chambers about what Congress´s role in foreign affairs issues should be.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T19:20:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Anna Carolina Santos.pdf: 863900 bytes, checksum: 7681d8e977733fed1222e40829927c2a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-03 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The present study analyzes the constitutions divided into ninety-three chapters of the First Mexican Provincial Council held in 1555. In this sense, as we have research problem is if the council norms respected or rejected the old religious practices. Through the reading of the religious chronicles of the Franciscan Bernardino de Sahagun and the Jesuit Jose de Acosta we seek indigenous religious practices reported everything that refers to the birth, marriage and penitence to, by the analysis of the constitutions of the council, scored the considerations about the administration of three of the sacraments: Baptism, Confession and Marriage. We identified what were the norms established by the conciliar assembly about the sacramental practices, whether it was taken into account the religious practices of the ancient Indians, who were still common in the region until 1555. The normatization of control intended to reconcile orthodoxy of doctrine and practice, generating conflicts and strategies of domination and resistance in an atmosphere of shock and political-cultural accommodation. We detected that when the council norms that regulate the sacramental practices caused the rupture with the indigenous religious practices / O presente estudo analisa as constituições divididas em noventa e três capítulos do Primeiro Concílio Provincial Mexicano, realizado em 1555. Neste sentido, temos como problema de pesquisa se a normatização conciliar respeitou ou rejeitou as práticas religiosas antigas. Através da leitura das crônicas religiosas do franciscano Bernardino de Sahagún e do jesuíta José de Acosta buscamos nas práticas religiosas indígenas relatadas tudo o que se refere ao nascimento, penitências e casamento para, por meio da análise das constituições do Concílio, pontuarmos as considerações sobre a administração de três dos sacramentos: Batismo, Confissão e Matrimônio. Identificamos quais foram as normas estabelecidas pela assembléia conciliar sobre as práticas sacramentais, se foi levado em consideração as práticas religiosas antigas dos índios, que eram ainda comuns na região até 1555. A normatização conciliar pretendia o controle da ortodoxia da doutrina e das práticas, o que gerou conflitos e estratégias de dominação e de resistências num ambiente de choques e acomodações políticoculturais. Detectamos que a normatização conciliar quando regulou as práticas sacramentais causou a ruptura com as práticas religiosas indígenas

Las comisiones fílmicas han estado, durante los últimos años, tomando un rol sumamente importante dentro de la industria cinematográfica y/o audiovisual de cada país. Mediante ella, muchas regiones han visto un crecimiento notable en sus ingresos en materia económica de la industria atrayendo a productores extranjeros a rodar dentro de sus países, en un fenómeno conocido como country placement. Empero, no todos los países, especialmente aquellos de la región latinoamericana, poseen una comisión de por sí. En ese sentido, la investigación busca inicialmente comprender que son estas comisiones, cómo se organizan y cuál es su influencia e impacto dentro de una industria audiovisual. Posteriormente, se buscará contrastar, mediante un análisis comparativo, las comisiones fílmicas de tres países en específico: España, México y Chile, para poder mediante una retrospección concluir puntos destacados, tanto en las políticas de las comisiones como su rol en la incentivación del country placement. El planteamiento teórico se basará en dos conceptos que tienen un vínculo clave: la estrategia de incentivación del fenómeno del country placement y las políticas de las comisiones fílmicas, siendo estas las dimensiones de la investigación. La propuesta metodológica será un estudio cualitativo recopilando resultados de estos tres países y dos entrevistas a expertos dando una cuota de subjetividad. El posible escenario de conclusión podría delimitar si las políticas y las estrategias de influencia de estas comisiones fueron verdaderamente positivas, pero también dar una introducción a analizar el contexto peruano en situación. / Comparative Analysis of Mexican, Spanish and Chilean Film Commissions, in relation to the development of country placement / Trabajo de investigación

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Cette thèse, qui s'inscrit dans le cadre d’études internationales, traite de la structure gouvernementale multi-niveaux de la gestion des ressources en eau de surface. À partir d’une approche interdisciplinaire, conciliant la géographie et la science politique, cette recherche porte sur la gouvernance des eaux de surface à l’échelle du bassin versant du Rio Grande/Río Bravo entre les États-Unis et le Mexique, et sur la territorialisation des divers gouvernements qui répondent de façon fragmentée aux besoins en termes de durabilité. La thèse s’articule autour de la question de recherche suivante : la gouvernance des eaux de surface du Rio Grande/Río Bravo s’effectue-t-elle selon les principes du développement durable ? Notre cas d’étude démontre l’existence d'un cadre de gouvernance multi-niveaux des ressources en eau à l’échelle du bassin versant. Il souligne la désarticulation entre les échelles locale, régionale, étatique et fédérale en raison de la fragmentation territoriale. Les préoccupations en matière de développement durable sont spécifiques à chaque région partitionnée par l’aménagement hydraulique. Des entrevues effectuées sur le terrain, avec des acteurs du bassin du Rio Grande et du Río Bravo, témoignent du découpage territorial et de la fragmentation dans la gestion des ressources en eau. La gouvernance du bassin versant consiste en une diversité de gouvernements et d’acteurs de la gestion de la ressource dans un cadre institutionnel résistant au changement. Nous montrons que les enjeux de pouvoir sur le territoire vis-à-vis de l’accès à la ressource, sa disponibilité et son contrôle, et les représentations géopolitiques que les acteurs s’en font, affectent la coordination d’activités à l’échelle du bassin versant. Les résultats attestent que le bassin versant n’est pas reconnu comme espace de gestion des ressources en eau et unité appropriée pour la durabilité. Le cadre institutionnel du partage de la ressource et l’aménagement hydraulique renforcent l’organisation du bassin en un ensemble hétérogène de sous-bassins qui gèrent la ressource à différentes échelles. Chaque gouvernement déploie des stratégies ad hoc pour faire face aux problèmes environnementaux, sans que le développement durable ne représente une préoccupation commune pour les acteurs du bassin versant. Dans un contexte de gouvernance multi-niveaux et de problèmes environnementaux liés au phénomène de la sécheresse, la collaboration entre les États-Unis et le Mexique est affaiblie par des tensions transfrontalières qui portent atteinte à la confiance mutuelle. Mots-clés: Gouvernance multi-niveaux, développement durable, gestion des ressources en eau, fragmentation, découpage territorial, asymétries de pouvoir, bassin versant du Rio Grande/Río Bravo, sous-bassins, États-Unis, Mexique. / This dissertation, which falls within international studies, discusses the multi-level governmental structure of surface water resources management. From an interdisciplinary approach, reconciling geography and political science, this research focuses on the governance of surface waters across the scale of the Rio Grande/Río Bravo Watershed between the United States and Mexico and on the territorialization of various governments that respond in a fragmented manner to the needs in terms of sustainability. This dissertation is organized around one main research question: is the governance of surface waters of the Rio Grande/Río Bravo carried out according to the principles of sustainable development? Our case study demonstrates the existence of a framework of multi-level governance of surface water resources across the watershed. It stresses the disarticulation between the local, regional, state and federal scale due to territorial fragmentation. The concerns of sustainable development are specific to each region, as partitioned by the hydraulic development. Interviews conducted in the field with actors from the Rio Grande basin and the Río Bravo basin reflect the territorial division and the fragmentation in the management of water resources. Governance consists in a diversity of actors involved in the resource management within an institutional framework resistant to change. We show that power imbalances over the territory — regarding access to the resource, its availability and its control, and the geopolitical representations held by stakeholders — affect the coordination of activities across the watershed. The results demonstrate that the watershed is not recognized as the spatial unit for water resource management and sustainability. The institutional framework for resource sharing and the hydraulic development reinforce the basin organization into a heterogeneous set of sub-basins managing the resource at different scales. Each government deploys ad hoc strategies to deal with environmental problems, without sustainable development being a common concern for stakeholders on the watershed. In a context of multi-level governance and environmental problems related to the phenomenon of drought, the collaboration between the United States and Mexico is weakened by cross-border tensions that undermine mutual trust. Keywords: Multi-level governance, sustainable development, management of water resources, fragmentation, territorial breakdown, power imbalances, Rio Grande/Río Bravo Watershed, sub-basins, United States, Mexico.