Orientadores: Newton Muller Pereira, Bernardino Ribeiro de Figueiredo / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Geociencias / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-07T23:38:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DiGiulio_GabrielaMarques_M.pdf: 4366800 bytes, checksum: e6341047d4c54b7fba846517d69c582b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 / Resumo: Este estudo tem como principais objetivos compreender os impactos das informações sobre a contaminação por chumbo no dia-a-dia dos moradores de Adrianópolis, cidade paranaense localizada no Vale do Ribeira, e conhecer e analisar as conseqüências advindas da ausência de uma estratégia previamente elaborada de comunicação de risco por parte dos pesquisadores envolvidos em pesquisas na região em passado recente. É proposta uma reflexão a respeito do papel dos cientistas na construção social do risco, da importância da comunicação de risco nos estudos relacionados à saúde pública e ao ambiente e do papel da mídia na divulgação científica e na amplificação da percepção do risco. Optou-se neste estudo por uma abordagem metodológica que contemplasse o cruzamento de três fontes: literatura, pesquisa empírica e pesquisa documental. O estudo envolveu entrevistas com pesquisadores, jornalistas, moradores e autoridades de Adrianópolis, ex-funcionários da refinaria Plumbum e profissionais da Secretaria de Saúde do Paraná. Envolveu também a análise de notícias sobre a contaminação de Adrianópolis, publicadas em 2001 em cinco veículos de comunicação. Os resultados apontaram que a mídia, apesar da sua importância na democratização de informações, interfere diretamente na percepção que as pessoas têm em relação aos riscos, pode colaborar para o aumento de crenças e mitos e reforçar estigmas criados em torno de pessoas e locais. Apontaram também que, no Brasil, por mais que pesquisadores e órgãos públicos estejam preocupados com a comunicação de risco, ainda há um longo caminho a percorrer nesta área até que estratégias em uso em outros países sejam colocadas em práticas aqui. A partir deste estudo, são propostas algumas diretrizes de comunicação de risco e divulgação científica concernentes à realidade do Brasil / Abstract: The present study was aimed to assess how the information about lead contamination in Adrianópolis (Paraná State, Brazil) impacted the day to day life of local residents. This study focused on the consequences of the lack of an efficient risk communication strategy in connection with environmental and public health studies carried out in Adrianópolis in the recent past. The role of scientists in the social construction of risk, the increasing importance of risk communication in public health and environmental studies, along with the responsibility of the media in the scientific divulgation and in the amplification of risk perception were considered among the topics analyzed in this study. These were approached by a combination of three data sources: scientific literature, documentary studies and empiric research. The latter included interviews with researchers, journalists, local residents and authorities, formeremployees of the Plumbum refinery and professionals of the Secretary of Health (Parana State). An analytical review of the news about lead contamination in Adrianópolis published in five communication vehicles in 2001 was also included in this study. The results point out that although the media is very important for the democratization of information, it interferes directly with the perception that people have about the risks since it reinforces people beliefs and myths and may contribute to strengthen negative stigmas about people and locations. The results showed that researchers and public agencies are well concerned about risk communication, but the debate about this theme in Brazil still has a long way to go to reach the same levels of standards of other countries. Finally, some guidelines and recommendations about risk communication and scientific divulgation are suggested to be adopted by Brazilian researchers / Mestrado / Mestre em Política Científica e Tecnológica

Studiens ämne handlar om förståelsen av risk under en hälsokris utifrån lokal riskkommunikation. Covid-19-pandemin utgör en stor hälsorisk för människor över hela världen. Tidigare forskning visar att riskkommunikation behöver nå och påverka människor så att de kan skydda sig själva mot de pågående riskerna. Därför är det viktigt att studera hur människor uppfattat riskerna med covid-19 från deras lokala kommunikatörer.  Syftet med studien är att undersöka hur studenter på eftergymnasial nivå i Jönköpings kommun förstod riskerna med covid-19 och avsåg att agera utifrån sin riskförståelse, utifrån Jönköpings kommuns riskkommunikation under våren 2020. Den specifika perioden som studeras är mellan 15 mars och 19 juni 2020. För att uppnå studiens syfte har fyra fokusgruppsintervjuer med studenter på eftergymnasial nivå i Jönköpings kommun genomförts och analyserats med en teoribaserad tematisk metod. Det teoretiska ramverket som använts för den tematiska analysen består av Uses and Gratifications Theory, Protection Motivation Theory och Theory of Planned Behavior.  Resultaten av studien visar att studenterna uppfattade riskerna med covid-19 som allvarliga, men att de inte haft avsikten att fullt ut ändra sina beteenden för att undvika riskerna. Deras riskförståelse berodde däremot inte på kommunikation från Jönköpings kommun, eftersom få av studenterna hade tagit del av deras kommunikation under våren 2020. Istället hade de använt källor som Folkhälsomyndigheten och nyhetssidor. Dessutom upplevde studenterna kommunikationen från kommunen som oseriös och bristfällig gällande viktig information. Resultaten visar att studenterna upplevde Jönköpings kommuns kommunikation om beteendeförändringar för att undvika risker som vag och svår att förstå, vilket inte bidrog till deras avsikt att ändra beteende / The subject matter of this study is risk perception during a health crisis based on local risk communication. The covid-19-pandemic is a mayor health crisis for citizens all over the world. Prior science has shown that risk communication needs to reach and affect citizens so they can protect themselves from the ongoing risks. Therefore, it is important to study how citizens have perceived the risks of covid-19 from their local communicators.    The purpose of this study is to examine how students on a post-gymnasium level in Jönköping municipality understood the risks of covid-19 and intended to act upon their perception of the risks based on the risk communication from Jönköping municipality, during the spring of 2020. The specific period examined is between the 15th of March and the 19th of June 2020. In order to achieve the aim, four focus group interviews with students on a post-gymnasium level in Jönköping have been conducted and analyzed through theoretically based thematic analysis. The theoretical framework used for the analysis of the focus group interviews consists of the Uses and Gratifications Theory, Protection Motivation Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior.  The results of the study show that the students perceived the risks of covid-19 as severe, but that they did not intend to fully change their behavior in order to avoid the risks. However, their risk perception was not based on the communication from Jönköping municipality since very few of them had seen their communication during the spring of 2020. Instead, they used sources like the national health authority and news channels. Additionally, the students found the communication from the municipality to be too lighthearted and lacking in vital information. The results show that the students found the municipality’s’ communication about behavioral change as vague and difficult to understand, which didn’t have an impact on their intention to behavioral change.

This research explores how community-centered solutions facilitate the success and ownership of the response actions to deal with a public health emergency, such as the Covid-19 pandemic. When an outbreak or a hazard impacts a group of people, there is a strong need for communication in order to be able to access to the right information that takes people to make the correct decision and thus to take a protective action to be safe. This approach, known as Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE)[1], allows the co-production of knowledge needed for a group of people to remain safe. For this approach, social listening tools, such as media monitoring and community feedback collection are critical understand communities’ needs. Its analysis allows to tailor a RCCE strategy that is able to substantially reduce the threat that a public health emergency poses to human lives[2].  Communities need solutions that are adapted to their needs in order to be able to deal with any emergency, including the Covid-19 pandemic. The RCCE approach empowers communities and provides them with the tools to amplify their voices. This participatory approach allows them to co-produce knowledge and get full ownership of the solutions.  Nevertheless, in an environment with excess of information, it may not be easy to discern the truth from the false. Unverified information and rumors are frequent and social media channels facilitate their rapid dissemination without borders. ‘Infodemic’ refers to an excessive amount of information concerning a problem such that the solution is made more difficult. (WHO, 2020)[3]  Some rumors may encourage people to take wrong decisions and perform actions that exacerbate risks during an emergency. The RCCE approach helps to promote real-time exchange of information to avoid that rumors and disinformation flourish. (WHO, 2018)[4]. It also allows to identify and implement community-centered solutions to communities’ problems.  RCCE needs data to monitor and evaluate its activities and reach effectively populations in risk to encourage them to observe the health preventive measures. Lives at risk depends on the right information conveyed through the right channel at the right time. To be able to supply tailored and accurate information to those communities and engage them, evidence-based RCCE strategies are needed, respecting the socio-anthropological and cultural context of the community. This research is based on the findings from five African countries -Cabo Verde, Cameroon, the Gambia, Mozambique and Niger-, all of them seriously affected by current Covid-19 pandemic. Its conclusions help to understand the critical role that RCCE plays in health emergencies resilient recovery.   [1] World Health Organization (WHO) (‎2020)‎. Risk communication and community engagement (‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎RCCE)‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎ readiness and response to the 2019 novel coronaviruses (‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎2019-‎‎nCoV)‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎: interim guidance, 26 January 2020. Geneva: WHO. [2] Risk Communication is one of the eight core functions of the International Health Regulations (2005) [3] World Health Organization (WHO) (‎2020)‎. Infodemic management: a key component of the COVID-19 global response. Weekly Epidemiological Record 95 (‎16)‎, 145 - 148. World Health Organization.  [4] World Health Organization (WHO) (2018). Communicating Risk in Public Health Emergencies - A WHO Guideline for Emergency Risk Communication (ERC) policy and practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.

No description available.

Hur myndigheter kommunicerar under kristider spelar en avgörande roll för hur både samhälle och näringsliv hanterar en kris. Denna deskriptiva studie undersöker hur Folkhälsomyndigheten kommunicerat under två pandemier, Covid-19 och Ebola, för att beskriva hur en svensk myndighet kommunikativt hanterat allvarliga kriser. Studien har tillämpat en kvantitativ innehållsanalys för att granska en större mängd publikationer och mäta teoretiskt intressanta egenskaper i Folkhälsomyndighetens kommunikation. För att fylla vad vi menar är en forskningslucka, den kvantitativa retorikanalysen, har operationaliseringar av centrala retoriska begrepp gjorts. Två urval har gjorts från Folkhälsomyndighetens nyhetsarkiv; ett totalurval av Ebola-publikationer (N=12) och ett slumpmässigt urval av Covid-19-publikationer (n=83), vilket sammantaget resulterade i 95 analysenheter. Dataanalys av publikationerna genomfördes i dataanalysprogrammet SPSS. Vår studie fann att Folkhälsomyndighetens riskkommunikation var dynamisk och anpassades utefter hur allvarlig en kris var och hur den utvecklades. Exempelvis manifesterade myndigheten risker när utvecklingen av Covid-19 var oroväckande och tvärtom, när pandemin var mindre allvarlig under sommarmånaderna. Myndigheten axlar huvudsakligen en rådgivande roll i kristider, i närmare 9 av 10 fall framkommer en eller flera uppmaningar om hur samhället bör förhålla sig till Covid-19. Vidare visar analysen att myndigheten vilade sin argumentation på sakliga eller statistiska bevis (ex. dokument eller forskningsrapporter) i mer än 70 procent av fallen, vilket tyder på ett rationellt övertygande. Studien visar prov på hur en kvantitativ retorikanalys kan genomföras och fyller därmed en forskningslucka. Vidare diskuteras vilka för- och nackdelar som uppstår när teoretiska begrepp omvandlas (operationaliseras) till mätbara variabler. / How authorities communicate during times of crisis plays a crucial part in how society and commerce manages a crisis. This descriptive analysis examines how the Swedish public health authority Folkhälsomyndigheten has communicated during two pandemics, Covid-19 and Ebola, in goal of depicturing how a Swedish government agency has communicated whilst handling a serious risk to public health. The study has applied a quantitative content analysis to examine a large number of publications and measure theoretically interesting properties in Folkhälsomyndigheten’s communication. Central rhetorical concepts have been operationalized and measured in order to fill what we perceive to be a research method gap, the quantitative rhetorical analysis. Two samples have been drawn from Folkhälsomyndigheten’s news archive; a complete sample of Ebola publications (N=12), and a sample of Covid-19 publications (n=83), resulting in a total of 95 units. The data analysis of the publications was performed using the data analysis program SPSS. Our study found that Folkhälsomyndigheten’s risk communication was dynamic and adapted to how severe a crisis was and how it developed. For example, the agency manifested the risks when Covid-19’s development was alarming, and the other way around when the development was less alarming during summer months. The agency primarily holds an advisory role in times of crisis; in almost 9 out of 10 cases one or more appeals or guidelines to the general public is apparent, on how society should adapt to Covid-19. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the agency bases their arguments on facts and statistics evidence (e.g. documentation or research reports) in more than 70 percent of the cases. Which suggests a rational persuasion tactic. The study exemplifies how a quantitative rhetorical analysis can be executed, and thus fills a research gap. In addition, the study discusses the pros and cons of converting (operationalizing) theoretical concepts to measurable variables.

Outbreaks of novel influenza viruses are continually occurring on many places on our planet, with the ultimate and most extreme consequence being a full-scale pandemic. Modern communication technology is widely used for risk communication regarding recommended change in behavior patterns and other precautions in order to mitigate the transmission. However, the assumption and bias that modern communication technology constitutes the norm causes vulnerable groups to be at possible risk of systematic exclusion to correct and updated information. Through conducting a literature- and case analysis, the aim of this study is to identify insufficient or inadequate risk communication efforts in South Korea and Vietnam during influenza outbreaks, especially with concern of vulnerable groups. Further, to analyze how national influenza preparedness plans observe or ignore these insufficiencies. Results show that vulnerable groups are explicitly recognized in the preparedness plan of Vietnam. However, the South Korean preparedness plan show a more homogenous approach. Both South Korea and Vietnam showed a broad variety of channels used in their risk communication strategies which could be positive in terms of a broad outreach to a heterogenous population, including vulnerable groups. Four key factors that moderate the outcomes of risk communication were identified: Channels, Messages, Transparency and Trust.

El Perú se encuentra en el cinturón de fuego del Pacífico, por lo que los sismos son un riesgo latente. Ante ello, el director de INDECI, reveló que 3 de cada 10 peruanos no participan de los simulacros de prevención. Por ello, se realizó una investigación a 17 limeños, divididos en cinco sesiones de focus group para identificar los comportamientos de los limeños entre 25 a 35 años con respecto a la prevención de sismos y su relación con la gestión de la comunicación de prevención. Debido a las características que se desea estudiar, el enfoque más apropiado es cualitativo con diseño fenomenológico. A partir de ello, se concluyó que existen dos tipos de percepción del riesgo: percepción de riesgo nula y percepción de riesgo no constante, debido a que los mensajes de comunicación no han sido interiorizados dando como resultado comportamientos asociados a la ausencia de compromiso y responsabilidad. / Peru is located in the fire belt of the Pacific, so tremors and earthquakes are a latent risk. Despite this, the director of the national civil defense institute revealed that 3 out of 10 Peruvians do not participate in the prevention drills. For this reason, a qualitative research was carried out, where 17 people from Lima participated, divided into five focus group sessions to identify the behaviors of Lima residents between 25 and 35 years old with respect to earthquake prevention and its relationship with the management of communication prevention. It was concluded that there are two types of risk perception: null risk perception and non-constant risk perception, due to the fact that communication messages have not been internalized, resulting in behaviors associated with the absence of commitment and responsibility. / Tesis

Jakten på orörd snö är en central del i offpistskidåkning. För att hjälpa allmänheten att ta säkra beslut i lavinterräng skriver lavinexperter varje år en lavinprognos. Lavinprognoser är en form av riskkommunikation vars syfte är att göra vinterturister och andra människor medvetna om vilka risker dem eventuellt kan utsättas för på berget. Den här rapportens syfte är att undersöka vinterturisternas förståelse för “the danger rating scale” och lavinprognoser. Samt för att se hur den påverkar deras risktagande och beslutsfattande i lavinterräng. För att besvara dessa forskningsfrågor har ett kvalitativt metodval använts i form av 8 semi-strukturerade intervjuer. Resultatet visar att “the danger rating scale” och lavinprognoser har ett stort inflytande på vinterturisternas risktagande och beslutsfattande i lavinterräng. Men att det finns en tveksamhet i tolkandet av skalan. / The hunt for untouched snow is a central part of off-piste skiing. To help the public make safe decisions in avalanche terrain, avalanche experts write an avalanche forecast every year. Avalanche forecasts are a form of risk communication whose purpose is to make winter tourists' and other people aware of the risks they may be exposed to on the mountain. The purpose of this report is to investigate winter tourists' understanding of "the danger rating scale" and avalanche forecasts. As well as to see how it affects their risk-taking and decision-making in avalanche terrain. To answer these research questions, a qualitative choice of method has been used in the form of 8 semi-structured interviews. The results show that "the danger rating scale" and avalanche forecasts have a great influence on winter tourists' risk-taking and decision-making in avalanche terrain. But that there is a doubt in the interpretation of the scale. / <p>2023-06-16</p>

The current study projects the third-person perception phenomenon into the area of emergency management, specifically regarding risk communication in the context of religious gatherings. This study utilized the Umrah religious gathering in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, during summer 2019 as a case study (N = 257). This study aimed to investigate whether pilgrims perceive there was a greater effect of health information on others than on themselves. Survey results were translated and then coded and analyzed statistically using SPSS software. The findings indicated that third-person perception existed among pilgrims. Specifically, the perception of pilgrims that the influence of news about MERS-CoV, believed to be undesirable in its effect on themselves, was greater on others than on themselves was found statistically significant. Further, the findings indicated that the more pilgrims watched, listened to, or read news about MERS-CoV, the larger the effect of the news they perceived on themselves and others was. Thus, exposure to MERS-CoV news did not increase, but rather decreased the perception of difference between self and others. Also, the empirical findings indicated that pilgrims who were knowledgeable about MERS-CoV could relate to the coverage. Moreover, if pilgrims believed they were affected by MERS-CoV news, they believed that the MERS-CoV news had a similar or greater effect on other pilgrims. The findings indicated socio-demographics had a partial effect on third-person perception, Finally, the stronger the perceived effect of MERS-CoV news on oneself, the more likely these pilgrims were to take protective actions against the MERS-CoV epidemic. However, the third-person perception anticipated in the use of impersonal communication (pamphlets, television, radio, newspapers, Internet, social media, text message, health clinics, mosques messages, public events, and billboards) and of interpersonal communication (friends, family member, or others you know) was not found significant. Moreover, the perceived effects of MERS-CoV news on others did not show third-person perception regarding behavior intention or consequences. These findings have implications for risk communication and its governance during religious gatherings as well as for the prepared individuals to promote preparation for risk and actions toward risk mitigation.

Smallholder farmers often have great entrepreneurial qualities that build on generations of experience. However, many farm management practices are poorly adapted to current climate change conditions. In order for farmers to understand the risks they are undertaking by following certain farming practices and to adapt accordingly, a decision support tool is being developed by researchers at TU Delft. The tool runs a socio-hydrological model, created in Python, in the back-end and provides farmer specific investment and profit data for different crops in the front-end. The aim of this study is to develop a risk assessment process that integrates hydro-climatic variability in the decision support tool, and to identify ways of communicating risk to smallholder farmers in Maharashtra, India. Two sources of variability were characterised based on a literature review of Indian farmers’ own risk perceptions; the untimely onset of the Indian Summer Monsoon and the frequency of dry spells. A sensitivity analysis was then carried out to investigate their respective effects on the farmers’ crop yields. The method proposed to evaluate these risks used a single variable, precipitation data, and a two-dimensional risk matrix to compound the two risk factors, over a time span of 14 years (2003-2016). However, the results indicate that it might be more beneficial to define dry spells in terms of crop water stress, instead of a precipitation threshold. This study also proposed a method for translating a cumulative distribution curve into a risk representation that is adapted for low-literacy users by combining numbers and text with graphics, color and voice descriptions. Ultimately, however, the usability of the tool cannot be determined solely through literature, but must involve the end-users in its design. / Småskaliga jordbrukare är goda entreprenörer som samlat på sig kunskaper och erfarenheter över flera generationer. Däremot är vissa metoder som jordbrukarna använder sig av idag för att förvalta sitt jordbruk inte anpassade till nutida klimatförändringar. För att jordbrukarna ska förstå riskerna som de åtar sig vid valet av dessa metoder försöker forskare vid TU Delft nu ta fram ett verktyg för att underlätta jordbrukares förmåga att ta självständiga men välgrundade beslut om sitt jordbruk. Verktyget är baserat på en socio-hydrologisk modell som är framtagen i Python och som förser specifika investerings- och inkomstdata för enskilda jordbrukare. Syftet med detta kandidatarbete är att bidra till verktyget genom att undersöka de hydroklimatiska risker som uppstår till följd av föränderliga och osäkra klimatologiska förhållanden för jordbrukare i delstaten Maharashtra, Indien. Två riskfaktorer karakteriserades baserat på en litteraturstudie om indiska jordbrukares riskuppfattningar: avvikelser i starten på den indiska sommarmonsunen och antal torrperioder under monsunsäsongen. Dessutom utfördes en känslighetsanalys för att undersöka om och hur den existerande modellens utdata av skörd påverkades av de valda riskfaktorerna. Monsunstarten och torrperioderna togs fram genom metoder som enbart använde historiska nederbördsdata över tidsperioden 2003-2016 och kombinerades sedan med hjälp av en tvådimensionell riskmatris. Resultaten visade att det fanns anledning att ifrågasätta hur torrperioderna definierades och att det kan vara mer fördelaktigt att undersöka vattenbrist för grödan, snarare än att enbart förlita sig på nederbördsdata. Vidare föreslog denna studie en metod för att översätta en kumulativ fördelningsfunktion till en grafisk riskframställning som är anpassad till användare med låg läskunnighet genom att kombinera siffror med text, grafik, färg och ljudförklaringar. I slutändan kan dock inte användbarheten av verktyget enbart avgöras utifrån litteratur, utan måste även inkludera återkoppling från slutanvändarna.