The purpose of this study was to research the experience of support in school for five students with dyslexia. Based on the above, the type of support the students received was examined, their individual experience with their learning difficulties, digital technology and their views about themselves and their individual learning. The study was based on a special educational and socio-cultural perspective.Support in the form of individualized teaching of special educators or specialist teachers has been the method that has historically been used the longest and all students testified to such support in the earlier years. Recently, digital tools have begun to be used more and the studies conducted in this field show that the effect is positive.The study was conducted using qualitative method based on personal interviews of five students in age 14 and 15. The results of this study showed that a majority of the students were positive about the support they received in school for their dyslexic difficulties. The teacher was an important factor in having the dyslexic student’s learning to be most effective. It appears that support for their dyslexic difficulties can contribute to the students feeling more involved in the school, which leads to increased motivation. However, detailed requirements for implementation and support are required for digital learning support to work most effectively. The teacher and their competencies are of great importance when working with students with dyslexia related to the use of digital technology.The school is facing a dilemma as special support can be perceived as a stigma and at the same time it is the prerequisite for the student’s experience of inclusion at the school. It also became clear that several students experienced the level of technology support inadequate.In a future study, the school should review the organizational structure and the specialist teacher’s role as the one who has the key responsibility and assists in the implementation of digital tools in the continuous support for their students.

This qualitative study explores how Swedish leisure-time teachers support newly arrived pupils in Stockholm. The study is based on semi-structured interviews with after-school teachers who work with newly arrived pupils. The aim is to identify how the teachers treat newly arrived pupils and what strategies they use when it comes to including them. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis. From the interviews, we found out that teachers use various strategies such as language support, activities in groups, and creating a safe environment to meet the diverse needs of newly arrived pupils in order to include them in society. However, teachers also face challenges such as limited resources and language barriers. Overall, this study contributes to the knowledge of how leisure-time teachers can support newly arrived pupils’ integration and learning in the Swedish context.

Abstract The aim of this thesis is to examine the practices of classroom learning communities whose pedagogy in the learning of science and mathematics draws on the sociocultural perspective. This pedagogical framework views learning as a collective process of meaning making situated in cultural contexts. This research thesis illuminates the ways in which communal learning activity is constructed into being in the social interactions of classroom learning communities. Methodologically, this research is concerned with unravelling the dynamics of collaborative learning processes, and with examining how they give rise to the construction of diverse voices during participation in cultural activities. The empirical findings discussed in this thesis are derived from three case studies. Case Study 1 examines the nature of participation processes in science classrooms representing three age levels (Kaartinen & Kumpulainen, 2001). Case Study 2 focuses on the construction of explanations in a collaborative science learning project (Kaartinen & Kumpulainen, 2002). Case Study 3, reported in two articles, investigates the processes and conditions for collaborative reasoning in an elementary classroom context with a special interest in mathematics (Kumpulainen & Kaartinen, 2000, 2003). On the basis of the findings of this thesis, successful collaboration — joint effort towards a joint non-predetermined goal of action — can be said to require the growth of communicative consciousness. This means the ability to approach the problem under question from the point of view of another person and hence conversely, an ability to see one's own position from the point of view of other person. In this thesis, collaborative negotiation processes consisted of diverse interpretations, varying from informal to formal explanations, and from descriptive reasoning to causal reasoning. It seems evident that the traditional approach to teaching does not give students enough tools to elaborate their conceptions. However, the results of this thesis indicate that the collaborative learning situations here described have the power to provide students with opportunities to elaborate their explanations. The results of this thesis highlight the potential of the sociocultural approach to engage students in educational interaction, where diverse voices are able to participate and contribute to the ongoing discussion. The involvement of all students in collaborative discourses also poses challenges to sociocultural pedagogy, calling for educators to recognise and support varied opportunities for participation in educational discourse. The examples presented in this thesis are aimed at providing educators and researchers with lenses through which to examine the sociocultural practices of these classrooms and potentially further develop them. / Tiivistelmä Väitöstutkimukseni tarkoituksena on tutkia sosiokulturaalista pedagogiikkaa soveltavien oppijayhteisöjen käytänteitä matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden luokkahuoneissa. Tämän pedagogisen lähestymistavan mukaan oppiminen nähdään yhteisöllisenä, kulttuurisiin käytänteisiin liittyvänä osallistumis- ja merkityksenantoprosessina. Tutkimus valottaa yhteisöllisten opiskelutilanteiden rakentumista ja realisoitumista tutkimukseen osallistuneiden luokkahuoneiden sosiaalisessa vuorovaikutuksessa. Tässä tutkimuksessa kehitettyjen tutkimusmenetelmien avulla halutaan selvittää yhteistoiminnallisten opiskeluprosessien luonnetta ja sitä, kuinka näiden prosessien avulla voidaan tukea erilaisten lähestymistapojen osallistumista kulttuurisiin toimintoihin. Tutkimuksen empiiriset tulokset ovat peräisin kolmesta eri tapaustutkimuksesta. Ensimmäinen tapaustutkimus (Kaartinen & Kumpulainen, 2001) tarkastelee kolmea eri ikäkautta edustavien luonnontieteiden luokkahuoneiden osallistumisen prosessia. Toinen tapaustutkimus (Kaartinen & Kumpulainen, 2002) keskittyy selitysten rakentumisen tutkimiseen yhteistoiminnallisuutta soveltavassa luonnontieteiden opiskeluprojektissa. Kolmas tapaustutkimus, joka on raportoitu kahdessa eri artikkelissa (Kumpulainen & Kaartinen, 2000, 2003), tutkii yhteistoiminnallisen merkityksenantoprosessin rakentumista ja luonnetta ala-asteen geometrian opetuksessa. Tulosten perusteella kommunikatiivinen tietoisuus on onnistuneen yhteistoiminnallisuuden edellytyksenä matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden opiskelussa. Kommunikatiivinen tietoisuus tässä yhteydessä tarkoittaa kykyä lähestyä tarkasteltavaa ongelmaa toisen osallistujan näkökulmasta ja vastaavasi kääntäen, kykyä nähdä oma asemansa osallistuvan toisen näkökulmasta. Yhteistoiminnallisten selitysten luonteen tutkimus toi esille erilaisia lähestymistapoja akateemiseen tietoon matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden alalla. Tässä tutkimuksessa selitysten rakentuminen koostui erilaisista tulkinnoista ja vaihteli informaalista selittämisestä formaaliin selittämiseen sekä kuvailevasta selittämisestä syy- seuraussuhteita etsivään selittämiseen. Tulokset valottavat sosiokulturaalisen lähestymistavan mahdollisuutta sellaisen kasvatuksellisen vuorovaikutuksen rakentumisessa, joka tukee erilaisten tulkintojen osallistumisen ja vaikuttamisen mahdollisuutta merkityksenantoprosessiin. Haasteen muodostaa sellaisen kasvatuksellisen vuorovaikutuksen rakentaminen, jossa myös hiljaiset oppijat osallistuvat yhteisölliseen merkityksenantoprosessiin. Tutkimuksessa esitettävät empiiriset esimerkit tarjoavat kasvattajille ja tutkijoille välineitä, joiden avulla voidaan tarkastella ja mahdollisesti myös kehittää matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden luokkahuoneiden sosiaalisia käytänteitä.

This essay sets out to examine my own practical knowledge as a socioculturally inspired preschool teacher conditioned by a capitalist ideology. Louis Althusser’s concept of ideology,as something reproduced by daily human actions, is used and the focus rests on language, or rather language use, especially in relation to the ‘autistic child’ as met in the preschool context. The analysis is supported by two specific traditions of thought: ordinary language philosophy – represented foremostly by Ludwig Wittgenstein, Stanley Cavell and Cora Diamond – and Marxist psychoanalysis, as particularly developed by Slavoj Žižek. The overall conclusion is that the preschool’s practical treatment of the autistic child can be read as a reaction to both ideological resistance and ideological disclosure. The autistic child is interpreted as representing a certain kind of imagination which is considered a threat in the capitalist/sociocultural preschool discourse. A discourse whose conditional criteria the essay also more thoroughly aims to uncover, using said traditions of thought.

Abstract This thesis concentrates on investigating the social construction of learning and teaching in a classroom that was encultured into working and acting as a community of inquiry across the curriculum. The theoretical and methodological premises of the study draw on sociocultural and sociolinguistic views on learning and instruction. Through this framework, the study aims at investigating the development, implementation and evaluation of the processes and conditions for communal inquiry across different pedagogical situations and across the curriculum in the case study classroom. In addition, the study aims at creating a pedagogical rationale for supporting meaningful, student-centred and problem-based learning in classroom. The research project was realised as a series of qualitative case studies. The subjects of the study were seventeen third-grade students from a Finnish elementary school and their teacher. The empirical data corpus consists of nine hours of videotaped classroom sessions gathered from the domains of philosophy, science and mathematics. Detailed, micro- and multilevel analyses were completed on the transcribed video recordings of whole classroom interaction. The results of the research project indicate that social interactions in the case study classroom were quite dominantly characterized by multilateral interactions amongst classroom members. Instead of mere information exchange, the nature of knowledge in this classroom was largely based upon sharing and defining views as well as negotiating evidence. In general, the students in this classroom clearly took charge of the cognitive work whereas the teacher’s responsibility was more directed towards managing the interactional practices during the joint discussions. However, there were occasions when the teacher stepped in as an analytic authority. The teacher scaffolding was grounded in the on-going interactions and varied in both quantity and quality whilst engaging in dialogue with individual students demonstrating different participation modes. Overall, the results of the study indicate that teacher scaffolding in this classroom supported communal inquiry from both the cognitive, social and socio-emotional perspectives. / Tiivistelmä Väitöstutkimus tarkastelee oppimisen ja opetuksen sosiaalista rakentumista luokassa, jonka toimintakulttuuri rakentuu tutkivan yhteisön periaatteille yli oppiainerajojen. Tutkimuksen teoreettinen viitekehys perustuu sosiokulttuurisille ja sosiolingvistisille oppimis- ja opetuskäsityksille. Tästä teoriataustasta käsin tutkimuksen tavoitteena on tarkastella tutkivan yhteisön periaatteille rakentuvan toimintakulttuurin prosesseja ja ehtoja tapaustutkimusluokassa. Lisäksi tutkimuksen pedagogisena tavoitteena on kehittää suuntaviivoja merkitykselliselle, oppilaskeskeiselle ja ongelmalähtöiselle oppimiselle. Tutkimusprojekti toteutettiin laadullisten tapaustutkimusten sarjana. Tutkimuskohteena ovat seitsemäntoista suomalaisen alakoulun 3. luokan oppilasta ja heidän opettajansa. Tutkimusaineisto koostuu yhdeksästä tunnista videoituja oppituntitilanteita filosofian, luonnontiedon ja matematiikan oppiaineissa. Koko luokan vuorovaikutustilanteita sisältävät litteroidut videotallenteet analysoitiin yksityiskohtaisin, mikro- ja monitasoisin analyysimenetelmin. Tutkimustulokset osoittavat, että tapaustutkimusluokan sosiaaliset vuorovaikutustilanteet rakentuivat vahvasti jäsenten väliselle, monenkeskiselle vuorovaikutukselle. Pelkän informaation vaihdon sijaan tiedon luonne tutkimuskohteena olleessa luokassa perustui yhteiselle näkökulmien jakamiselle, tarkentamiselle ja perustelemiselle. Luokan oppilaat ottivat vastuuta tiedollisista neuvotteluista, kun taas opettajan vastuu kohdentui enemmänkin vuorovaikutuksen ohjaamiseen yhteisten keskustelujen aikana. Kuitenkin opettaja astui esiin luokan vuorovaikutustilanteissa välillä myös analyyttisenä asiantuntijana. Opettajan tuki määrittyi luokan vuorovaikutustilanteiden kautta, ja se vaihteli määrältään ja laadultaan opettajan ollessa vuorovaikutuksessa osallistumiseltaan erilaisten oppilaiden kanssa. Kaiken kaikkiaan tutkimustulokset osoittavat, että opettajan ohjaus luokkayhteisössä tuki tutkivan yhteisön rakentumista niin tiedollisesta, sosiaalisesta kuin sosioemotionaalisesta näkökulmasta.